Ȩ Ä«Å×°í¸® ¸ÂÃãÇü½ÃÀåÁ¶»ç ±¹Á¦ÄÁÆÛ·±½º ±Û·Î¹ú ÆÄÆ®³Ê ¸ÞÀϸµ ¼­ºñ½º ȸ»ç¼Ò°³È¸»ç¼Ò°³ Contact Us
English Japaness Chinese
Home > ½ÃÀ庸°í¼­ > ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÅ×Å©³î·¯Áö > ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀåºñ > Developments in Early-Stage Toxicity Prediction
Ä«Å×°í¸®
¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÅ×Å©³î·¯Áö (1590)
°Ô³ð â¾à (202)
¸ÂÃãÇüÀÇ·á (51)
¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸¶Ä¿ (154)
¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÅÆ®¸®¾ó (54)
¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀåºñ (357)
ºÐÀÚÇ¥ÀûÄ¡·á(MTT) (131)
À¯ÀüÀÚ Ä¡·á/RNAi (101)
Àç»ýÀÇÇÐ (124)
Ç×ü/¸é¿ª (191)
½ÃÀ庸°í¼­

Developments in Early-Stage Toxicity Prediction

¸®¼­Ä¡»ç Decision Resources, Inc.
¹ßÇàÀÏ 2008³â 10¿ù »óǰÄÚµå 76010
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ 27 Pages
°¡°Ý
US $ 2,250 £Ü 2,680,800 PDF by E-mail (Global License)


¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

Abstract

Introduction

Drug toxicity is a major cause of costly late-stage development failures and devastating market withdrawals. To reduce these failures, researchers are developing novel toxicity prediction technologies that can be integrated into the early stages of drug development. Collaboration among regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and research institutions promises to advance this fi eld.

Get the Answers You Need to Shape Your Strategy

  • Companies are seeking alternatives to low-throughput, expensive animal studies for predicting drug toxicity. How advanced are these alternative technologies? How can these technologies be applied during drug discovery?
  • The need for toxicity prediction tools provides opportunities for companies that can develop and exploit novel technologies. Which companies are developing and offering novel tools and/or services? What partnerships are these companies forming with Big Pharma? What types of technologies are commercially available?
  • Drug manufacturers are concerned about regulatory acceptance of new toxicity assays and biomarkers. How are regulatory agencies addressing these concerns? What programs are available to industry to encourage working with regulatory agencies in the fi eld of toxicity prediction? What initiatives include participation by regulatory agencies?
  • To develop reliable toxicity prediction tools, researchers require access to vast datasets of experimental and clinical information. How can researchers develop and access this information? How can public-private initiatives promote data-sharing among industry, government, and academia? What progress has been achieved by these initiatives?

Scope

  • Drawbacks of traditional toxicology: traditional indicators; predictive reliability of animal models; throughput; cost.
  • Emerging in vitro assays: microscale cell culture devices, toxicology microarrays; human embryonic stem cells.
  • ' Omics technologies: toxicogenomics; databases; commercial microarrays; proteomics, metabolomic profi ling, voluntary genomic data submissions (VGDSs); voluntary exploratory data submissions (VXDSs).
  • Novel predictive tools: Computational prediction tools; reference databases; novel animal models.
  • Public-private projects and consortia: FDA; Critical Path Initiative; Predictive Safety Testing Consortium (PSTC); Development and Application of Biomarkers of Toxicity Technical Committee; Consortium for Metabonomic Toxicology; Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); National Toxicology Program; National Research Council; ToxCast.
  • Company highlights: Companies involved in systems biology; bioinformatics; computational analysis; human embryonic stem cells; cell-based assays; toxicogenomics; reference databases; novel animal models.

Companies Mentioned in This Spectrum Report

  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Accelrys
  • Affymetrix
  • Allergan
  • AstraZeneca
  • Amgen
  • Bayer
  • Bayer Healthcare
  • BG Medicine
  • Biogen Idec
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Caliper Life Sciences
  • Cellartis
  • Cellumen
  • Centocor
  • ChemSilico
  • ClinXus
  • CompuDrug
  • Eisai
  • Elan Pharmaceuticals
  • Eli Lilly
  • Entelos
  • Expression Analysis
  • GeneGo
  • Gene Logic
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Hoffmann-La Roche
  • Iconix Biosciences
  • Invitrogen
  • Janssen Pharmaceutica
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Lhasa
  • Merck
  • Merck Serono
  • Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings
  • Mitsubishi Pharma
  • Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma
  • Multicase
  • Novartis
  • NovaThera
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Ocimum Biosolutions
  • Ore Pharmaceuticals
  • Orion
  • Par Pharmaceutical
  • Parke-Davis
  • Pfi zer
  • Phylonix Pharmaceuticals
  • Purdue Pharma
  • Quantum Pharmaceuticals
  • Roche
  • Sankyo
  • Sanofi -Aventis
  • Schering-Plough
  • Servier
  • SimuGen
  • Solidus
  • StemCells
  • Symyx
  • Teva Pharmaceutical
  • UCB
  • Valeant Pharmaceuticals
  • VistaGen Therapeutics
  • VivoMedica
  • Warner-Lambert
  • Waters
  • Wyeth
  • Wyeth-Ayerst
  • Zygogen

Table of Contents

Contents

  • Executive Summary
    • Strategic Considerations
    • Stakeholder Implications
  • Introduction
  • Drawbacks of Traditional Approaches to Toxicology
  • Emerging In Vitro Toxicity Assays
    • Microscale Cell Culture Systems
    • MetaChip and DataChip
    • Human Embryonic Stem Cells
  • ' Omics Technologies
  • Toxicogenomics
    • Toxicogenomics Databases
    • Commercial Toxicogenomics Arrays
    • Toxicoproteomics
    • Toxicometabolomics
    • Regulatory Oversight of ' Omics Technologies
  • Computational Toxicity Prediction Tools
  • Zebrafi sh Models
  • Government, Industry, and Academic Projects and Consortia
    • The Critical Path Initiative and the Predictive Safety Testing Consortium
    • HESI Biomarkers of Toxicity Technical Committee
    • Consortium for Metabonomic Toxicology
    • EPA Initiatives in Toxicology Prediction
  • Company Highlights
    • BG Medicine
    • Cellartis
    • Cellumen
    • Gene Logic
    • Iconix Biosciences
    • Phylonix Pharmaceuticals
    • SimuGen
  • Outlook for Predictive Toxicity Testing

Tables

  • 1. Select Drugs Withdrawn from the Market for Safety Reasons, 1998-2008
  • 2. Select Current Assays and Tools for Predicting Drug Toxicity and Metabolism
  • 3. Toxicogenomics Reference Databases and Resources
  • 4. Select Computational Tools for Predictive Toxicology
  • 5. Industry Members of Select Public-Private Toxicology Consortia

Figures

  • 1. Reasons for Termination of Drug Candidates During Development
  • 2. The Toxicogenomics Approach
  • 3. ToxCast: Developing Toxicity Signatures for Chemicals
Back to Top