Ȩ Ä«Å×°í¸® ¸ÂÃãÇü½ÃÀåÁ¶»ç ±¹Á¦ÄÁÆÛ·±½º ±Û·Î¹ú ÆÄÆ®³Ê ¸ÞÀϸµ ¼­ºñ½º ȸ»ç¼Ò°³È¸»ç¼Ò°³ Contact Us
English Japaness Chinese
Home > ½ÃÀ庸°í¼­ > ¿¡³ÊÁö > ½º¸¶Æ®±×¸®µå > Residential Energy Management -AMI Fact Book
Ä«Å×°í¸®
¿¡³ÊÁö (4241)
¹ßÀü (1036)
¹èÅ͸® (205)
½º¸¶Æ®±×¸®µå (256)
¿¬·áÀüÁö (77)
¿øÀڷ¿¡³ÊÁö (86)
Àü·Â (435)
ûÁ¤¿¡³ÊÁö (809)
ž籤 (327)
dz·Â¿¡³ÊÁö (172)
È­¼®¿¬·á (962)
UPS (61)
½ÃÀ庸°í¼­

Residential Energy Management -AMI Fact Book

¸®¼­Ä¡»ç Parks Associates
¹ßÇàÀÏ 2009³â 07¿ù »óǰÄÚµå 95338
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ 161 Pages
°¡°Ý
US $ 3,000 £Ü 3,574,500 PDF by E-mail (Single User License) plus Excel Spreadsheet


¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

Abstract

SYNOPSIS

This report is a catalog of current and future AMI and smart meter deployments in the U.S. It includes profiles of utilities, government agencies, and private organizations influencing the development and use of Smart Grid systems. It also includes specific data on current utility activities, including a summary of deployments and plans, the number of residential customers covered, and the types of meters and technologies implemented. Detailed data are provided in a separate Excel file for review and analysis.

“Environmental concerns, the rising cost of energy, and new government initiatives are all driving the renewed and very real push for residential energy management,” said Bill Ablondi, director, home systems research. “This report is a comprehensive snapshot of the current status and activities of utilities throughout the U.S. and provides solid data on the capabilities they are enabling and the technologies they are implementing.”

Table of Contents

AMI Fact Book - Volume I (Utility, Agency and Organization Profiles)

1.0 Introduction

  • 1.1 Definition of AMI/Smart Meter
  • 1.2 The AMI Fact Book Volume II

2.0 Background information on AMI Deployments

  • 2.1 Smart Grid Stimulus Funding
  • 2.2 Technology Primer

3.0 Governmental Agencies and Organizations Influencing Smart Grid Deployment

  • 3.1 Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)
  • 3.2 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
  • 3.3 GridWise Architecture Council (GWAC)
  • 3.4 National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC)
  • 3.5 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
  • 3.6 Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT)

4.0 Utility Profiles

  • 4.1 Utility Profiles: Summaries
  • 4.2 Selected Utilities
    • AEP subsidiary Indiana Michigan Power Utility
    • Allegheny Power
    • Ameren IL
    • Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
    • Brunswick Electric Membership Corporation
    • CPS Energy
    • DTE
    • Dominion Resources, Inc.
    • First Electric Cooperative Corporation
    • Hawaiian Electric Company
    • Holland Board of Public Works
    • Magic Valley Electric Cooperative
    • Mississippi Power
    • Modesto Irrigation District (PUD)
    • Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO)
    • Progress Energy
    • Rappahannock Electric Cooperative
    • Sacramento Municipal Utility District
    • San Diego Gas & Electric
    • Santee Cooper - South Carolina Public Service Authority
    • Snapping Shoals Electric Membership Cooperative
    • South Central Power Co.
    • City of Springfield City Water, Power and Light, IL
    • Your Own Utilities (Local Utility Company)
  • 4.3 Utility Profiles
    • 4.3.1 Alabama Power
    • 4.3.2 Alliant Energy
    • 4.3.3 Arizona Public Service (APS)
    • 4.3.4 Austin Energy
    • 4.3.5 CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
    • 4.3.6 Commonwealth Edison (ComEd)
    • 4.3.7 Duke Energy
    • 4.3.8 Florida Power and Light Company (FPL)
    • 4.3.9 City of Fort Collins Electric Utility
    • 4.3.10 Georgia Power
    • 4.3.11 Gulf Power
    • 4.3.12 Idaho Power
    • 4.3.13 Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCPL)
    • 4.3.14 Los Angeles Department for Water and Power (LADWP)
    • 4.3.15 Lee County Electric Cooperative (LCEC)
    • 4.3.16 Oncor
    • 4.3.17 Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
    • 4.3.18 Pedernales Electric Cooperative
    • 4.3.19 Portland General Electric (PGE)
    • 4.3.20 PPL Electric Utilities
    • 4.3.21 Salt River Project (SRP)
    • 4.3.22 City of San Marcos Electric Utility
    • 4.3.23 Southern California Edison (SCE)
    • 4.3.24 Spanish Fork Electric Utility
    • 4.3.25 Xcel Energy SmartGridCity

5.0 Smart Meter Forecast

6.0 Notes on Methodology

  • 6.1 Data Sources

7.0 Appendices

  • 7.1 Appendix A: Notice of Intent
  • 7.2 Appendix B: Funding Criteria
  • 7.3 Appendix C: Smart Grid Grant Funding Opportunity Announcement
  • 7.4 Appendix D: Acronyms
  • 7.5 Appendix E: Glossary

AMI Fact Book - Volume II Master Spreadsheet (Excel)

  • AMI meter deployment summary
  • Appendix A: Acronyms
  • Appendix B: Glossary
  • Summary
  • Smart Meter Forecast
  • List of Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs)
  • List of Utility Cooperatives (Co-ops)
  • List of Municipally Owned Utilities (Munis)
  • Other types of utilities
  • Utilities deploying Capacity Market programs
  • Utilities deploying Critical Peak Pricing programs
  • Utilities deploying Critical Peak Rebate programs
  • Utilities deploying Demand Bidding programs
  • Utilities deploying Direct Load Control programs
  • Utilities deploying Emergency Demand Response programs
  • Utilities deploying Interruptible and Curtailable programs
  • Utilities deploying Real-time pricing programs
  • Utilities deploying Time-of-use programs

FIGURES

  • Stimulus Fund allocation
  • Anticipated number of stimulus awards
  • Tentative application deadlines
  • Wired Backhaul Communication Networks
  • Wireless Backhaul Communication Networks
  • HAN Communications and Control Technologies
  • AMI Meter Penetration by Type of Utility
  • Summaries of Smart Meter Deployments and Trials
  • Households with AMI Capable Meters
Back to Top