¡Ø º» »óÇ°Àº ¿µ¹® ÀÚ·á·Î Çѱ۰ú ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¿¡ ºÒÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â ³»¿ëÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ì ¿µ¹®À» ¿ì¼±ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤È®ÇÑ °ËÅ並 À§ÇØ ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¸¦ Âü°íÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
¼¼°èÀÇ ÆíµÎÅë ½ÃÀå¿¡ ´ëÇØ Á¶»çÇßÀ¸¸ç, ½ÃÀåÀÇ °³¿ä¿Í Ãâ½Ã Ä¡·á¹ý, ÆÄÀÌÇÁ¶óÀÎ µ¿Çâ, Àü¸Á µîÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
¸ñÂ÷
ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à
ÇöÀç ¹× ÇâÈÄ Ä¡·á ¾Ë°í¸®Áò
Á¶»ç ¸ñÀû
½ÃÆÇ Ä¡·á¹ý
- Botox(onabotulinum toxin A; AbbVie)
- Aimovig(erenumab/erenumab-aooe; Amgen/Novartis)
- Ajovy(fremanezumab/fremanezumab-vfrm; Teva)
- Emgality(galcanezumab/galcanezumab-gnlm; Lilly)
- Reyvow/Rayvow(lasmiditan; Lilly)
- Ubrelvy(ubrogepant; AbbVie)
- Nurtec ODT/Vydura(rimegepant; Pfizer)
- Qulipta/Aquipta(atogepant; AbbVie)
- Vyepti(eptinezumab; Lundbeck)
- Zavzpret(zavegepant; Pfizer)
Ãʱ⠴ܰèÀÇ °³¹ß ÇÁ·Î±×·¥
°æ±¸ °ÔÆÇÆ® ¹× ÇÇÇÏ Ç×CGRP mAbÀÇ ÇöÀç µ¿ÅÂ
ÆíµÎÅë Ä¡·áÀÇ ¹Ì·¡ Àü¸Á
ºÎ·Ï
KSA 24.04.03
Why do many KOLs prefer Teva's Ajovy or Lilly's Emgality over Amgen/Novartis' Aimovig for the preventive management of migraine? Over the next five years, neurologists anticipate subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs will challenge Botox as the first-line treatment for migraine prevention, but that use of Lundbeck's Vyepti will remain limited - why? KOLs critically assess the prospects of launched and pipeline therapies.
Key questions answered:
- How do KOLs assess the potential impact of Xeomin, Dysport and prabotulinumtoxinA on the use of AbbVie's well-established Botox?
- Why are experts impressed by AbbVie's Botox+ Qulipta/Aquipta combination trial?
- How do KOLs prescribe Pfizer's Nurtec ODT/Vydura, and what other studies do experts recommend?
- What underpins neurologists' opinion that AbbVie's Qulipta/Aquipta is preferable to Pfizer's Nurtec ODT in the preventive management of migraine?
- Why do neurologists say that despite being an effective treatment, Lilly's lasmiditan is currently reserved for later-line therapy?
- Why are KOLs not particularly impressed by the clinical data for Pfizer's Zavzpret?
Key brands covered in this report:
- Botox
- Aimovig
- Ajovy
- Emgality
- Reyvow/Rayvow
|
- Ubrelvy
- Nurtec ODT/Vydura
- Qulipta/Aquipta
- Vyepti
- Zavzpret
|
Table of Contents
Executive summary (6)
Current and future treatment algorithm
Research objectives (3)
Marketed therapies (137)
- Botox (onabotulinum toxin A; AbbVie) (18)
- Key insights summary (18)
- Aimovig (erenumab/erenumab-aooe; Amgen/Novartis) (10)
- Key insights summary (10)
- Ajovy (fremanezumab/fremanezumab-vfrm; Teva) (10)
- Key insights summary (10)
- Emgality (galcanezumab/galcanezumab-gnlm; Lilly) (10)
- Key insights summary (10)
- Reyvow/Rayvow (lasmiditan; Lilly) (14)
- Key insights summary (14)
- Ubrelvy (ubrogepant; AbbVie) (9)
- Nurtec ODT/Vydura (rimegepant; Pfizer) (16)
- Key insights summary (16)
- Qulipta/Aquipta (atogepant; AbbVie) (16)
- Key insights summary (16)
- Vyepti (eptinezumab; Lundbeck) (21)
- Key insights summary (21)
- Zavzpret (zavegepant; Pfizer) (13)
- Key insights summary (13)
Early-stage development programmes (22)
- Key insights summary (22)
- KOLs are pleased with the Phase II HOPE trial and are enthusiastic about the potential of PACAP therapy in migraine treatment (20)
Current dynamics of oral gepants and subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs (12)
- Key insights summary (12)
- Better tolerability profile of oral gepants makes them the preferred option over triptans: some KOLs favour subcutaneous mAbs over oral gepants due to adherence issues (10)
Future Outlook for the Migraine Therapies (10)
- Key insights summary (10)
- Neurologists foresee triptans to remain a standard choice for acute migraine, with gepants being the second line of treatment (8)
Appendix (4)