Global Information
회사소개 | 문의 | 비교리스트

세계의 ATaaS(Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service) 시장(2020-2026년) : 제품, 용도, 국가별

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market - A Global and Regional Analysis: Focus on Product, Application, and Country Analysis - Analysis and Forecast, 2020-2026

리서치사 BIS Research Inc.
발행일 2021년 12월 상품코드 1044837
페이지 정보 영문 배송안내 1-2일 (영업일 기준)
가격
US $ 5,250 ₩ 6,758,000 PDF (1-3 User License)
US $ 8,100 ₩ 10,427,000 PDF and Excel (Global License)


세계의 ATaaS(Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service) 시장(2020-2026년) : 제품, 용도, 국가별 Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market - A Global and Regional Analysis: Focus on Product, Application, and Country Analysis - Analysis and Forecast, 2020-2026
발행일 : 2021년 12월 페이지 정보 : 영문

본 상품은 영문 자료로 한글과 영문 목차에 불일치하는 내용이 있을 경우 영문을 우선합니다. 정확한 검토를 위해 영문목차를 참고해주시기 바랍니다.

세계의 ATaaS(Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service) 시장 규모는 예측 기간 중 24.42%의 CAGR로 추이하며, 2026년에는 30억 3,110만 달러 규모로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다.

이 시장의 성장은 농업 자동화 및 디지털화를 향한 정부기관의 지원 확대에 의하는 것입니다.

지역별로 보면 북미 지역이 2020년에 최대의 매출을 보이고 있습니다. 이 지역의 점유율이 높은 것은 대부분의 국가에서 자동화·제어 시스템의 적용이 진행되고 있는 것 및 스마트 농업의 도입률이 높아지고 있는 것이 ATaaS의 도입 확대로 연결되고 있기 때문입니다. 북미의 ATaaS 시장은 예측 기간 중 21.93%의 CAGR로 성장할 것으로 예측되고 있습니다.

세계의 ATaaS(Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service) 시장을 조사했으며, 시장 개요, 시장 영향요인 분석, 정부 구상, 시장 규모의 추이·예측, 제품·용도·지역/주요 국가 등 각종 부문별 내역, 경쟁 환경, 주요 기업의 개요 등을 정리하여 전해드립니다.

목차

제1장 시장

  • 산업의 전망
    • 가격결정 모델
    • 손익분기점 분석
    • 첨단 솔루션
    • 정부 구상 상황
  • 사업 역학
    • 사업 성장요인
    • 사업상 과제
    • 사업 전략
    • 기업 전략
    • 사업 기회

제2장 용도

  • ATaaS 시장 : 용도별
    • 수확량 지도제작 & 모니터링
    • 토양 관리
    • 작물 헬스 모니터링
    • 내비게이션·포지셔닝
    • 기타
  • 수요 분석 : 용도별

제3장 제품

  • ATaaS 시장 : 제품별
    • ATaaS 시장 : 서비스 유형별
    • ATaaS 시장 : 기술별
  • 수요 분석 : 제품별
    • 수요 분석 : 서비스 유형별
    • 수요 분석 : 기술별

제4장 지역

  • 북미
  • 남미
  • 유럽
  • 영국
  • 중동과 아프리카
  • 중국
  • 아시아태평양

제5장 경쟁 벤치마킹·기업 개요

  • 경쟁 벤치마킹
  • 기업 개요
    • 365FarmNet GmbH
    • Accenture plc
    • AGCO Corporation
    • Agrellus, Inc.
    • Agrivi
    • Airbus S.A.S
    • AT&T Inc.
    • Ceres Imaging Inc.
    • CLAAS Group
    • CNH Industrial NV
    • Cropln Technology Solutions Pvt.Ltd.
    • Deere & Company
    • DeHaat
    • Fujitsu Limited
    • Harvest Automation Inc.
    • Hexagon Agriculture
    • IBM Corporation
    • Intertek Group plc
    • Kubota Corporation
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • Naio Technologies
    • Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
    • Parrot SA
    • Pixhawk
    • Precision Hawk Inc.
    • Raven Industries Inc.
    • Robert Bosch GmbH
    • SGS S.A.
    • Small Robot Company
    • Syngenta AG
    • SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
    • Taranis
    • Teejet Technologies
    • Topcon Corporation
    • Trimble Inc.
    • Yanmar Co. Ltd.

제6장 조사 방법

KSA 22.01.20

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Macroeconomic Trends Impacting the Farming Industry Growth
  • Figure 2: Future Agriculture Field Scenario with Smart Farm Technologies
  • Figure 3: Drivers and Restraints: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 4: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2020-2026
  • Figure 5: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service (by Service Type), $Million, 2021 and 2026
  • Figure 6: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2021 and 2026
  • Figure 7: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2021 and 2026
  • Figure 8: Regional Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2020
  • Figure 9: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Coverage
  • Figure 10: Advantages-Disadvantages of Bundled Per Acre Model
  • Figure 11: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Pass/Service Model
  • Figure 12: Advantages-Disadvantages of Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain Model
  • Figure 13: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Unit of Product Sold Model
  • Figure 14: Graphical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
  • Figure 15: Mathematical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
  • Figure 16: Break-Even Point of Satellite Images (ha)
  • Figure 17: Global Agricultural Productivity Index, 2005-2050
  • Figure 18: Sources of Growth in Food Production
  • Figure 19: Long-Term Evolution of Commodity Prices
  • Figure 20: FAO Food Price Index Number of People Living in Urban and Rural Areas of the World (2000-2020)
  • Figure 21: USDA Investments in Agricultural Research Centres
  • Figure 22: Number of People Employed in Agriculture (2000-2015)
  • Figure 23: Share of Agriculture in Total Employment in Various Countries (2000-2015)
  • Figure 24: Percentage of Population in Various Countries Affected by Cyber Crime and Data Breach (2020-2021)
  • Figure 25: Share of Key Market Strategies and Developments, 2017-2021
  • Figure 26: Product Development and Innovation (by Company), March 2018 - April 2021
  • Figure 27: Market Development (by Company), June 2017- October 2021
  • Figure 28: Mergers and Acquisitions (by Company), May 2017 - August 2021
  • Figure 29: Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures (by Company), April 2017 - November 2021
  • Figure 30: Investments Raised by Various Agri-Tech Start-Ups in India (2010-2019)
  • Figure 31: Amount in Investments Raised by Agri-Tech Start-Ups in India (2014-2019)
  • Figure 32: Global Farm Management Software and Data Analytics Market (by Application)
  • Figure 33: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type)
  • Figure 34: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology)
  • Figure 35: Competitive Market High & Low Matrix
  • Figure 36: Sources of Secondary Research
  • Figure 37: Report Methodology
  • Figure 38: Data Triangulation
  • Figure 39: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach for Market Estimation

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Summary Table of Satellite Sensor Features
  • Table 2: Cost Features of Satellite Sensors
  • Table 3: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
  • Table 4: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
  • Table 5: Rural Infrastructure in Various Countries
  • Table 6: Key Yield Mapping and Monitoring Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 7: Key Soil Management Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 8: Key Crop Health Management Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 9: Key Navigation and Positioning Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 10: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 11: Key Players with Software-as-a-Service Service Type
  • Table 12: Key Players with Equipment-as-a-Service Service Type
  • Table 13: Key Data Analytics & Intelligence Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 14: Key Guidance Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 15: Key Sensing Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 16: Key Variable Rate Application Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 17: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 18: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 19: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Region), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 20: North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 21: South America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 22: Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 23: U.K. Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 24: Middle East and Africa Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 25: China Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 26: Asia-Pacific Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
  • Table 27: 365FarmNet GmbH: Service portfolio
  • Table 28: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 29: Accenture plc: Service portfolio
  • Table 30: AGCO Corporation: Solution Service Portfolio
  • Table 31: Product Development
  • Table 32: Market Developments
  • Table 33: Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Table 34: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 35: Agrellus, Inc: Product Portfolio
  • Table 36: Product Developments
  • Table 37: Agrellus, Inc.: Partnerships, Joint Ventures, Collaborations, and Alliances
  • Table 38: Agrivi: Service portfolio
  • Table 39: Product Developments
  • Table 40: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 41: Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Table 42: Airbus S. A. S: Service portfolio
  • Table 43: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 44: AT&T Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 45: Ceres Imaging Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 46: Product Developments
  • Table 47: CLAAS Group: Service Portfolio
  • Table 48: Product Developments
  • Table 49: Market Developments
  • Table 50: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 51: CNH Industrial N. V.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 52: Product Developments
  • Table 53: Market Developments
  • Table 54: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 55: Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Table 56: Crop In Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 57: Poduct Developments
  • Table 58: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 59: Deere & Company: Service Portfolio
  • Table 60: Product Developments
  • Table 61: Market Developments
  • Table 62: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 63: Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Table 64: Product Portfolio
  • Table 65: DeHaat: Business Expansion
  • Table 66: DeHaat: Merger and Acquisitions
  • Table 67: Fujitsu Limited Service Portfolio
  • Table 68: Market Developments
  • Table 69: Product Developments
  • Table 70: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 71: Harvest Automation Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 72: Hexagon Agriculture: Service portfolio
  • Table 73: Product Developments
  • Table 74: Market Developments
  • Table 75: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 76: IBM Corporation: Service Portfolio
  • Table 77: Product Developments
  • Table 78: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 79: Intertek Group plc: Service portfolio
  • Table 80: Kubota Corporation: Service portfolio
  • Table 81: Market Developments
  • Table 82: Product Developments
  • Table 83: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 84: Microsoft Corporation: Service portfolio
  • Table 85: Market Developments
  • Table 86: Product Developments
  • Table 87: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 88: Naio Technologies: Service portfolio
  • Table 89: Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 90: Product Developments
  • Table 91: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 92: Parrot SA: Service portfolio
  • Table 93: Product Developments
  • Table 94: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 95: Pixhawk: Service portfolio
  • Table 96: PrecisionHawk Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 97: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 98: Raven Industries Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 99: Product Developments
  • Table 100: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 101: Robert Bosch GmbH: Service portfolio
  • Table 102: Market Developments
  • Table 103: Product Developments
  • Table 104: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 105: SGS S.A.: Service portfolio
  • Table 106: Small Robot Company: Service portfolio
  • Table 107: Syngenta AG: Service Portfolio
  • Table 108: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 109: Market Developments
  • Table 110: SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd: Service portfolio
  • Table 111: Product Developments
  • Table 112: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 113: Taranis: Service portfolio
  • Table 114: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 115: Teejet Technologies: Service portfolio
  • Table 116: Topcon Corporation: Service portfolio
  • Table 117: Trimble Inc: Service portfolio
  • Table 118: Product Developments
  • Table 119: Market Developments
  • Table 120: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 121: Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Table 122: Yanmar Co. Ltd.: Service portfolio
  • Table 123: Product Developments

“Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market to Reach $3,031.1 Million by 2026.”

Market Report Coverage - Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service

Market Segmentation

  • Application: Yield Mapping and Monitoring, Soil Management, Crop Health Monitoring, Navigation and Positioning, Others
  • Service Type: Software-as-a-Service, Equipment-as-a-Service
  • Technology: Data Analytics and Intelligence, Guidance Technology, Sensing Technology, Variable Rate Application Technology, Others

Regional Segmentation

  • North America: U.S., Canada, and Mexico
  • Europe: Germany, France, Italy, and Rest-of-Europe
  • U.K.
  • Middle East and Africa: South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Israel
  • China
  • Asia-Pacific: India, Japan, Australia, and Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
  • South America: Brazil, Argentina, Rest-of-South America

Market Growth Drivers

  • Increasing Demand for Global Food Production
  • Increase in Yields Drives Food Production Growth
  • Economic Need for Precision Agriculture
  • Surging Use of Modern Technologies in Agriculture
  • Decreasing Workforce in Agriculture Sector

Market Challenges

  • Lack of Proper Infrastructure such as Roads, Internet, and Network Connectivity
  • Cyber and Online Data Security
  • Huge Subscription Costs Act as a Challenge
  • Reluctance to Adopt and Lack of Technical Awareness Among Farmers

Market Opportunities

  • Growth in Agriculture Service Economy
  • Increasing Investments in Agriculture Technology Sector
  • Rising Trend of Farming-as-a-Service in India
  • Increasing Market Opportunities in Developing Countries
  • Increased Cloud Security

Key Companies Profiled

365FarmNet GmbH, Accenture plc, AGCO Corporation, Agrellus, Inc., Agrivi, Airbus S.A.S, AT&T Inc., Ceres Imaging Inc., CLAAS Group, CNH Industrial N.V., Cropln Technology Solutions Pvt.Ltd., Deere & Company, DeHaat, Fujitsu Limited, Harvest Automation Inc., Hexagon Agriculture, IBM Corporation, Intertek Group plc, Kubota Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Naio Technologies, Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc., Parrot SA, Pixhawk, Precision Hawk Inc., Raven Industries Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, SGS S.A., Small Robot Company, Syngenta AG, SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd, Taranis, Teejet Technologies, Topcon Corporation, Trimble Inc., Yanmar Co. Ltd.

How This Report Can Add Value

This extensive report can help with:

  • This report covers major regions with established agriculture technology-as-a-service market.
  • Extensive competitive benchmarking of the top 36 players (including OEMs and equipment providers) has been done to offer a holistic view of the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market landscape.

Product/Innovation Strategy: The product segment helps the reader in understanding the different types of agriculture technology-as-a-service for the agriculture industry and their potential globally. Moreover, the study provides the reader a detailed understanding of the operation of different agriculture technology-as-a-service products by service type and by technology.

Recent Developments in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market

  • In March 2021, Syngenta announced that it would redevelop its North American Crop Protection headquarters in Greensboro, North Carolina.
  • In July 2020, DeHaat launched the franchise model in order to expand its business in Eastern India. In this model, the company ties up with small enterprises in rural areas to procure agricultural inputs from companies such as Bayer Crop Sciences and sell it to farmers, plus procure farmer's produce from within a range of 3-6 kilometers.
  • In November 2019, AGCO Corporation expanded its Edgewood, Md assembly and distribution facility for Fendt high horsepower tractors and Massey Ferguson compact and utility tractors and equipment.
  • In April 2019, CLAAS KGaA mbH opened its new validation center for the development of new agricultural machinery at the Harsewinkel site.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

  • What is the estimated global agriculture technology-as-a-service market size in terms of revenue for the forecast period 2021-2026, and what is the expected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) during the forecast period 2021-2026?
  • What are the key trends, market drivers, and opportunities in the market pertaining to agriculture technology-as-a-service?
  • What are the major restraints inhibiting the growth of the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market?
  • What kinds of new strategies are being adopted by the existing market players to strengthen their market position in the industry?
  • What is the competitive strength of the key players in the agriculture technology-as-a-service market based on an analysis of their recent developments, product offerings, and regional presence?
  • How is the competitive benchmarking of the key agriculture technology-as-a-service companies in the agriculture market based on the analysis of their market coverage and market potential?
  • How much revenue is each segment expected to record during the forecast period, along with the growth percentage?
  • What is the type of players and stakeholders operating in the market ecosystem of agriculture technology-as-a-service, and what is their significance in the global market?

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service

Agriculture technology-as-a-service is a business model that allows the customers to procure their desired agriculture technology (equipment or software) as a service under different affordable pricing models rather than acquiring them as a one-time purchase. Two of the most popular pricing models under agriculture technology-as-a-service include the pay-per-use (PPU) and subscription models. Agriculture technology-as-a-service business models provide the growers with certain features such as easy scalability and upgradation, convenient accessibility, quick deployment, and reliable data backups.

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Industry Overview

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market is expected to reach $3,031.1 million by 2026, with a CAGR of 24.42% during the forecast period 2021-2026. The growth rate in the market is because of the increased push by governing bodies toward agricultural automation and digitization.

Impact of COVID-19

The supply chain for the majority of the industries across the globe got impacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the agriculture technology-as-a-service industry. During the COVID-19 outbreak, the supply chain of the agriculture industry was disrupted. During the COVID-19 pandemic, agricultural production was hindered for farmers, which led to a decrease in their revenue generation. This has left the farmers in no position to invest in modern agricultural equipment.

Market Segmentation

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market by Service Type

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market in the service type product segment is expected to be dominated by software-as-a-service. The high market share and growth potential associated with software-as-a-service technologies in the agriculture industry is expected to drive the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market.

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market by Technology

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market in the technology product segment is expected to be dominated by data analytics and intelligence solutions. Data analytic solutions have the ability to increase agricultural production and are expected to drive the agriculture technology-as-a-service market.

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market by Application

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market in the application segment is expected to be dominated by yield monitoring and mapping. The high market share and growth potential associated with yield mapping and mapping is expected to drive the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market.

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market by Region

North America is expected to generate the highest revenue in 2020. The large market share of the region has been attributed to the increased application of automation and control systems in most of the countries and the rising adoption rate of smart farming practices leading to increased adoption of agriculture technology-as-a-service. The North America market for agriculture technology-as-a-service is expected to witness a moderate growth as of CAGR 21.93% in the forecast period.

Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis

365FarmNet GmbH, Accenture plc, AGCO Corporation, Agrellus, Inc., Agrivi, Airbus S.A.S, AT&T Inc., Ceres Imaging Inc., CLAAS Group, CNH Industrial N.V., Cropln Technology Solutions Pvt.Ltd., Deere & Company, DeHaat, Fujitsu Limited, Harvest Automation Inc., Hexagon Agriculture, IBM Corporation, Intertek Group plc, Kubota Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Naio Technologies, Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc., Parrot SA, Pixhawk, Precision Hawk Inc., Raven Industries Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, SGS S.A., Small Robot Company, Syngenta AG, SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd, Taranis, Teejet Technologies, Topcon Corporation, Trimble Inc., Yanmar Co. Ltd.

The companies that are profiled in the report have been selected based on the selective pool of players, primarily Tier-1 (holding 50-60% of the market), mid-segment players (comprising 30-40% share), and small and emerging companies (holding the balance 10-20% share), based on various factors such as product portfolio, annual revenues, market penetration, research, and development initiatives, along with a domestic and international presence in the agriculture technology-as-a-service industry.

Table of Contents

1 Markets

  • 1.1 Industry Outlook
    • 1.1.1 Pricing Models
      • 1.1.1.1 Bundled Per Acre
      • 1.1.1.2 Per Pass/Service
      • 1.1.1.3 Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain
      • 1.1.1.4 Per Unit of Product Sold
    • 1.1.2 Break-Even Analysis
      • 1.1.2.1 Introduction
      • 1.1.2.2 Components of Break-Even Analysis
      • 1.1.2.3 Calculation of Break-Even Analysis
      • 1.1.2.4 Case Studies
    • 1.1.3 Advanced Solutions
      • 1.1.3.1 Agriculture Robot-as-a-Service (ARaaS)
      • 1.1.3.2 Agriculture Drone-as-a-Service (ADaaS)
    • 1.1.4 Government Initiatives Landscape
      • 1.1.4.1 North America
      • 1.1.4.2 Europe
      • 1.1.4.3 U.K.
      • 1.1.4.4 Asia-Pacific
      • 1.1.4.5 China
      • 1.1.4.6 Rest-of-the-World
  • 1.2 Business Dynamics
    • 1.2.1 Business Drivers
      • 1.2.1.1 Increasing Demand for Global Food Production
      • 1.2.1.2 Increase in Yields Drives Food Production Growth
      • 1.2.1.3 Economic Need for Precision Agriculture
      • 1.2.1.4 Surging Use of Modern Technologies in Agriculture
      • 1.2.1.5 Decreasing Workforce in Agriculture Sector
    • 1.2.2 Business Challenges
      • 1.2.2.1 Lack of Proper Infrastructure such as Roads, Internet, and Network Connectivity
      • 1.2.2.2 Cyber and Online Data Security
      • 1.2.2.3 Huge Subscription Costs Act as a Challenge
      • 1.2.2.4 Reluctance to Adopt and Lack of Technical Awareness Among Farmers
    • 1.2.3 Business Strategies
      • 1.2.3.1 Product Development
      • 1.2.3.2 Market Development
      • 1.2.3.3 Others
    • 1.2.4 Corporate Strategies
      • 1.2.4.1 Mergers and Acquisitions
      • 1.2.4.2 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
    • 1.2.5 Business Opportunities
      • 1.2.5.1 Growth in Agriculture Service Economy
      • 1.2.5.2 Increasing Investments in Agriculture Technology Sector
      • 1.2.5.3 Rising Trend of Farming-as-a-Service in India
      • 1.2.5.4 Increasing Market Opportunities in Developing Countries
      • 1.2.5.5 Increased Cloud Security

2 Application

  • 2.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application)
    • 2.1.1 Yield Mapping and Monitoring
    • 2.1.2 Soil Management
    • 2.1.3 Crop Health Monitoring
    • 2.1.4 Navigation and Positioning
    • 2.1.5 Others
  • 2.2 Demand Analysis of Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application)

3 Products

  • 3.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Product)
    • 3.1.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type)
      • 3.1.1.1 Software-as-a-Service
      • 3.1.1.2 Equipment-as-a-Service
    • 3.1.2 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology)
      • 3.1.2.1 Data Analytics and Intelligence
      • 3.1.2.2 Guidance Technology
      • 3.1.2.3 Sensing Technology
      • 3.1.2.4 Variable Rate Application Technology
      • 3.1.2.5 Others
  • 3.2 Demand Analysis of Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Product)
    • 3.2.1 Demand Analysis of Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type)
    • 3.2.2 Demand Analysis of Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology)

4 Regions

  • 4.1 North America
    • 4.1.1 Market
      • 4.1.1.1 Key Providers in North America
      • 4.1.1.2 Business Drivers
      • 4.1.1.3 Business Challenges
    • 4.1.2 North America (by Country)
      • 4.1.2.1 U.S.
        • 4.1.2.1.1 Market
          • 4.1.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.1.2.1.1.2 Key Providers Operating in the U.S.
          • 4.1.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.1.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.1.2.2 Canada
        • 4.1.2.2.1 Market
          • 4.1.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.1.2.2.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Canada
          • 4.1.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.1.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.1.2.3 Mexico
        • 4.1.2.3.1 Market
          • 4.1.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.1.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Mexico
          • 4.1.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.1.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
  • 4.2 South America
    • 4.2.1 Market
      • 4.2.1.1 Key Providers in South America
      • 4.2.1.2 Business Drivers
      • 4.2.1.3 Business Challenges
    • 4.2.2 South America (by Country)
      • 4.2.2.1 Brazil
        • 4.2.2.1.1 Market
          • 4.2.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.2.2.1.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Brazil
          • 4.2.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.2.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.2.2.2 Argentina
        • 4.2.2.2.1 Market
          • 4.2.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.2.2.2.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Argentina
          • 4.2.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.2.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.2.2.3 Rest-of-South America
        • 4.2.2.3.1 Market
          • 4.2.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.2.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Rest-of-South America
          • 4.2.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.2.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
  • 4.3 Europe
    • 4.3.1 Market
      • 4.3.1.1 Key Providers in Europe
      • 4.3.1.2 Business Drivers
      • 4.3.1.3 Business Challenges
    • 4.3.2 Europe (by Country)
      • 4.3.2.1 Germany
        • 4.3.2.1.1 Market
          • 4.3.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.3.2.1.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Germany
          • 4.3.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.3.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.3.2.2 France
        • 4.3.2.2.1 Market
          • 4.3.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.3.2.2.1.2 Key Providers Operating in France
          • 4.3.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.3.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.3.2.3 Italy
        • 4.3.2.3.1 Market
          • 4.3.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.3.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Italy
          • 4.3.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.3.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.3.2.4 Rest-of-Europe
        • 4.3.2.4.1 Market
          • 4.3.2.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.3.2.4.1.2 Key Providers Operating in the Rest-of-Europe
          • 4.3.2.4.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.3.2.4.1.4 Business Drivers
  • 4.4 The U.K.
    • 4.4.1 Markets
      • 4.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
      • 4.4.1.2 Key Providers in the U.K.
      • 4.4.1.3 Business Challenges
      • 4.4.1.4 Business Drivers
  • 4.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 4.5.1 Market
      • 4.5.1.1 Key Providers in Middle East and Africa
      • 4.5.1.2 Business Drivers
      • 4.5.1.3 Business Challenges
    • 4.5.2 Middle East and Africa (by Country)
      • 4.5.2.1 South Africa
        • 4.5.2.1.1 Market
          • 4.5.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.5.2.1.1.2 Key Providers Operating in the South Africa
          • 4.5.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.5.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.5.2.2 Saudi Arabia
        • 4.5.2.2.1 Market
          • 4.5.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.5.2.2.1.2 Key Providers Operating in the Saudi Arabia
          • 4.5.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.5.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.5.2.3 Israel
        • 4.5.2.3.1 Market
          • 4.5.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.5.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Israel
          • 4.5.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.5.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
  • 4.6 China
    • 4.6.1 Markets
      • 4.6.1.1 Buyer Attributes
      • 4.6.1.2 Key Providers in China
      • 4.6.1.3 Business Challenges
      • 4.6.1.4 Business Drivers
  • 4.7 Asia-Pacific
    • 4.7.1 Market
      • 4.7.1.1 Key Providers in Asia-Pacific
      • 4.7.1.2 Business Drivers
      • 4.7.1.3 Business Challenges
    • 4.7.2 Asia-Pacific (by Country)
      • 4.7.2.1 Japan
        • 4.7.2.1.1 Market
          • 4.7.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.7.2.1.1.2 Key Providers in Japan
          • 4.7.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.7.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.7.2.2 India
        • 4.7.2.2.1 Market
          • 4.7.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.7.2.2.1.2 Key Providers in India
          • 4.7.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.7.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.7.2.3 Australia
        • 4.7.2.3.1 Market
          • 4.7.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.7.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Australia
          • 4.7.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.7.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
      • 4.7.2.4 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
        • 4.7.2.4.1 Market
          • 4.7.2.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.7.2.4.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Rest-of-Asia Pacific
          • 4.7.2.4.1.3 Business Challenges
          • 4.7.2.4.1.4 Business Drivers

5 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles

  • 5.1 Competitive Benchmarking
  • 5.2 Company Profiles
    • 5.2.1 365FarmNet GmbH
      • 5.2.1.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.1.1.1 Role of 365FarmNet GmbH in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.1.1.2 Service Portfolio
        • 5.2.1.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.1.2 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.1.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.1.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of 365FarmNet GmbH
    • 5.2.2 Accenture plc
      • 5.2.2.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.2.1.1 Role of Accenture plc in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.2.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.2.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.2.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Accenture plc
    • 5.2.3 AGCO Corporation
      • 5.2.3.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.3.1.1 Role of AGCO Corporation in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.3.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.3.1.3 Production Sites and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.3.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.3.2.1 Product Development
        • 5.2.3.2.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.3.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.3.3.1 Mergers and Acquisitions
        • 5.2.3.3.2 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.3.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of AGCO Corporation
    • 5.2.4 Agrellus, Inc.
      • 5.2.4.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.4.1.1 Role of Agrellus Inc in Digital Agriculture Marketplace Market
        • 5.2.4.1.2 Product Portfolio
      • 5.2.4.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.4.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.4.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.4.3.1 Partnerships, Joint Ventures, Collaborations, and Alliances
      • 5.2.4.4 Strength and Weakness Agrellus, inc.
    • 5.2.5 Agrivi
      • 5.2.5.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.5.1.1 Role of Agrivi in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.5.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.5.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.5.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.5.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.5.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.5.3.1 Mergers and Acquisitions
      • 5.2.5.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Agrivi
    • 5.2.6 Airbus S.A.S
      • 5.2.6.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.6.1.1 Role of Airbus S.A.S in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.6.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.6.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.6.2 Corporate Strategies
      • 5.2.6.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Airbus S.A.S
    • 5.2.7 AT&T Inc.
      • 5.2.7.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.7.1.1 Role of AT&T Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.7.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.7.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of AT&T Inc. Corporation
    • 5.2.8 Ceres Imaging Inc.
      • 5.2.8.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.8.1.1 Role of Ceres Imaging Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.8.1.2 Service Portfolio
      • 5.2.8.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.8.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.8.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Ceres Imaging Inc.
    • 5.2.9 CLAAS Group
      • 5.2.9.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.9.1.1 Role of CLAAS Group in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.9.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.9.1.3 Production Sites and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.9.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.9.2.1 Product Developments
        • 5.2.9.2.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.9.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.9.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.9.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of CLAAS Group
    • 5.2.10 CNH Industrial NV
      • 5.2.10.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.10.1.1 Role of CNH Industrial N.V. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.10.1.2 Service Portfolio
        • 5.2.10.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.10.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.10.2.1 Product Developments
        • 5.2.10.2.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.10.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.10.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
        • 5.2.10.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
      • 5.2.10.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of CNH Industrial N.V.
    • 5.2.11 Cropln Technology Solutions Pvt.Ltd.
      • 5.2.11.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.11.2 Role of CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 5.2.11.3 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.11.3.1 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.11.4 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.11.4.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.11.5 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.11.5.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.11.6 Strengths and Weaknesses of CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd
    • 5.2.12 Deere & Company
      • 5.2.12.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.12.2 Role of Deere & Company in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.12.2.1 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.12.2.2 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.12.3 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.12.3.1 Product Developments
        • 5.2.12.3.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.12.4 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.12.4.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
        • 5.2.12.4.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
      • 5.2.12.5 Strengths and Weaknesses of Deere & Company
    • 5.2.13 DeHaat
      • 5.2.13.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.13.2 Role of DeHaat in Digital Agricultural Marketplace Market:
      • 5.2.13.3 Product Portfolio
      • 5.2.13.4 Business Strategies
      • 5.2.13.5 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.13.5.1 Merger and Acquisitions
      • 5.2.13.6 Strength and Weakness of DeHaat
    • 5.2.14 Fujitsu Limited
      • 5.2.14.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.14.1.1 Role of Fujitsu Limited in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.14.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.14.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.14.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.14.2.1 Market Developments
        • 5.2.14.2.2 Product Developments
      • 5.2.14.3 Corporate Strategies
      • 5.2.14.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Fujitsu Limited
    • 5.2.15 Harvest Automation Inc.
      • 5.2.15.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.15.1.1 Role of Harvest Automation Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.15.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.15.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.15.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Harvest Automation Inc.
    • 5.2.16 Hexagon Agriculture
      • 5.2.16.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.16.2 Role of Hexagon Agriculture in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
      • 5.2.16.3 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.16.3.1 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.16.4 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.16.4.1 Product Developments
        • 5.2.16.4.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.16.5 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.16.5.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.16.6 Strengths and Weaknesses of Hexagon Agriculture
    • 5.2.17 IBM Corporation
      • 5.2.17.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.17.1.1 Role of IBM Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.17.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.17.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.17.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.17.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.17.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.17.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.17.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of IBM Corporation
    • 5.2.18 Intertek Group plc
      • 5.2.18.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.18.1.1 Role of Intertek Group plc in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.18.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.18.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Intertek Group plc
    • 5.2.19 Kubota Corporation
      • 5.2.19.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.19.2 Role of Kubota Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a- Service Market
        • 5.2.19.2.1 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.19.2.2 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.19.3 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.19.3.1 Market Developments
        • 5.2.19.3.2 Product Developments
      • 5.2.19.4 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.19.4.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.19.5 Strengths and Weaknesses of Kubota Corporation
    • 5.2.20 Microsoft Corporation
      • 5.2.20.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.20.1.1 Role of Microsoft Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a- Service Market
        • 5.2.20.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.20.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.20.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.20.2.1 Market Developments
        • 5.2.20.2.2 Product Developments
      • 5.2.20.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.20.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.20.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Microsoft Corporation
    • 5.2.21 Naio Technologies
      • 5.2.21.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.21.1.1 Role of Naio Technologies in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.21.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.21.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.21.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Naio Technologies
    • 5.2.22 Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
      • 5.2.22.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.22.1.1 Role of Nutrien AgSolution, Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.22.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.22.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.22.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.22.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.22.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.22.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
    • 5.2.23 Parrot SA
      • 5.2.23.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.23.1.1 Role of Parrot SA in the Global Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.23.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.23.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.23.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.23.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.23.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.23.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.23.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Parrot SA
    • 5.2.24 Pixhawk
      • 5.2.24.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.24.1.1 Role of Pixhawk in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.24.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.24.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Pixhawk
    • 5.2.25 Precision Hawk Inc.
      • 5.2.25.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.25.1.1 Role of PrecisionHawk Inc. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.25.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.25.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.25.2 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.25.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.25.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of PrecisionHawk Inc.
    • 5.2.26 Raven Industries Inc.
      • 5.2.26.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.26.1.1 Role of Raven Industries Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.26.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.26.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.26.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.26.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.26.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.26.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Raven Industries Inc.
    • 5.2.27 Robert Bosch GmbH
      • 5.2.27.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.27.1.1 Role of Robert Bosch GmbH in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.27.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.27.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.27.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.27.2.1 Market Developments
        • 5.2.27.2.2 Product Developments
      • 5.2.27.3 Corporate Strategies
      • 5.2.27.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Robert Bosch GmbH
    • 5.2.28 SGS S.A.
      • 5.2.28.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.28.1.1 Role of SGS S.A. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.28.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.28.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of SGS S.A.
    • 5.2.29 Small Robot Company
      • 5.2.29.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.29.1.1 Role of Small Robot Company in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.29.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.29.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.29.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Small Robot Company
    • 5.2.30 Syngenta AG
      • 5.2.30.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.30.2 Role of Syngenta AG in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.30.2.1 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.30.2.2 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.30.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.30.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.30.4 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.30.4.1 Market Developments
      • 5.2.30.5 Strength and Weakness of Syngenta AG
    • 5.2.31 SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
      • 5.2.31.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.31.1.1 Role of SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.31.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.31.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.31.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.31.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.31.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.31.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.31.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
    • 5.2.32 Taranis
      • 5.2.32.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.32.1.1 Role of Taranis in Agriculture Technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.32.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.32.2 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.32.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.32.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Taranis
    • 5.2.33 Teejet Technologies
      • 5.2.33.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.33.1.1 Role of Teejet Technologies in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.33.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.33.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Teejet Technologies
    • 5.2.34 Topcon Corporation
      • 5.2.34.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.34.1.1 Role of Topcon Corporation in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.34.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.34.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.34.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Topcon Corporation
    • 5.2.35 Trimble Inc.
      • 5.2.35.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.35.1.1 Role of Trimble Inc. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.35.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.35.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.35.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.35.2.1 Product Developments
        • 5.2.35.2.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.35.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.35.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
        • 5.2.35.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
      • 5.2.35.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Trimble Inc.
    • 5.2.36 Yanmar Co. Ltd.
      • 5.2.36.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.36.1.1 Role of Yanmar Co. Ltd in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.36.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.36.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.36.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.36.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.36.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Yanmar Co. Ltd.

6 Research Methodology

  • 6.1 Data Sources
    • 6.1.1 Primary Data Sources
    • 6.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
  • 6.2 Market Research Methodology
    • 6.2.1 Data Triangulation
      • 6.2.1.1 Market Estimation and Forecast
    • 6.2.2 Assumptions
    • 6.2.3 Limitations
Back to Top
전화 문의
F A Q