Global Information
회사소개 | 문의

100/400G 컴포넌트 조사 : 시장 전망(2018년)

100/400G Components Survey: 2018 Market Outlook

리서치사 Heavy Reading
발행일 2018년 03월 상품 코드 613531
페이지 정보 영문 23 Pages
US $ 2,495 ₩ 2,841,000 PDF By E-mail (Includes Corporate Access)

100/400G 컴포넌트 조사 : 시장 전망(2018년) 100/400G Components Survey: 2018 Market Outlook
발행일 : 2018년 03월 페이지 정보 : 영문 23 Pages

100-400G 네트워크 인터페이스의 수요는 네트워크 가상화 및 클라우드 서비스로의 이동에 의해 촉진되어 빠르게 확대되고 있습니다.

통신 및 네트워크 장비 제조업체의 100G, 400G, 800G 및 기타 인터페이스 현재 사용 상황과 향후 예측에 대해 이들 공급업체에서 일하는 엔지니어, 설계자, 제품 매니저 및 세일즈/마케팅 인력을 대상으로 한 조사 결과를 바탕으로 분석하여 전해드립니다.

제1장 주요 요약

제2장 조사 개요

제3장 100-800G 시스템

  • 100G 포트를 출하하고 있는 기업 수는?
  • 어떤 종류의 시스템이 100G 포트를 지원하고 있는가?
  • 400G 포트를 출하하고 있는 기업 수는?
  • 기업이 800G 포트를 출하하는 것은 언제가 될 것인가?

제4장 인터페이스 속도와 포트 종류

  • 지원되는 인터페이스 속도
  • 400G 이더넷 포트 종류 : 현재 및 향후

제5장 PHY 디바이스와 벤더

  • 어떤 종류의 PHY 디바이스인가?
  • 어떤 PHY 벤더가 사용되고 있는가?
  • PHY 벤더 등급설정

제6장 100-400G 광모듈

  • 100G 모듈
  • 400G 모듈

제7장 광모듈 벤더

  • 어떤 광모듈 벤더가 사용되고 있는가?
  • 광모듈 벤더의 등급설정
  • OEM이 100-400G 광모듈을 선택하는 방법

제8장 결론


KSM 18.03.22

The demand for 100-400G network interfaces continues to grow rapidly, driven by network virtualization and the shift to cloud services. Within data centers, servers now support 10GE or 25GE interfaces, requiring significant bandwidth through top-of-rack switches and between racks. Many large and hyper-scale data centers already have 100G connections between racks, and operators are already migrating to 400G and looking at 800G. These developments are also putting strain on data center interconnects (DCI) between data centers, requiring operators to migrate from 100G to 200G and 400G connections.

400G deployments are well underway for enterprise and data center applications, initially using CFP8 optical modules but transitioning to QSFP-DD as these modules become available in volume. OSFP will also be important for some applications. The IEEE has adopted four 400GE port types for 100m MMF, 500m parallel SMF, 2km SMF and 10km SMF. These are a great start, but the industry is looking for alternative port types that can deliver lower cost and lower power solutions as the volume of 400G interface shipped accelerates.

Performance remains the key criteria for selecting 100/400G optical modules; however, there are multiple secondary criteria, including cost, vendor, latency and power. Finisar continues to lead this market, but several vendors are challenging this lead, including Acacia, Fujitsu, Intel and Oclaro. Going forward, lower-cost 400G interfaces and 800G interfaces will be particularly important for data centers and companies are already working on solutions.

100/400G Components Survey: 2018 Market Outlook analyzes the current and projected use of 100G, 400G, 800G and other interfaces by telecom and networking equipment manufacturers, based on the results of an exclusive worldwide survey of engineers, designers, product managers and sales/marketing personnel that work for those suppliers. The responses to our survey make it clear that these devices are critical components in most types of networking equipment, from the access edge to the core of the network and data centers.

The following excerpt shows the results when we asked respondents when their company will ship products with 400G interfaces. Almost one third (32 percent) said that their company was already shipping 400G, and a further 14 percent said they would do so within six months or one year. These results show that 400G is now well established.


100/400G Components Survey: 2018 Market Outlook is published in PDF format.

Table of Contents


  • 1.1 Key Findings
  • 1.2 Companies Covered


3. 100-800G SYSTEMS

  • 3.1 How Many Companies Ship 100G Ports?
  • 3.2 What Types of Systems Support 100G Ports?
  • 3.3 How Many Companies Ship 400G Ports?
  • 3.4 When Will Companies Ship 800G Ports?


  • 4.1 Interface Speeds Supported
  • 4.2 400G Ethernet Port Types Now & Future


  • 5.1 Which Types of PHY Device?
  • 5.2 Which PHY Vendors Are Used?
  • 5.3 PHY Vendor Ratings


  • 6.1 100G Modules
  • 6.2 400G Modules


  • 7.1 Which Optical Module Vendors Are Used?
  • 7.2 Optical Module Vendor Ratings
  • 7.3 How OEMs Choose 100-400G Optical Modules




  • Acacia Communications Inc.
  • Achronix Semiconductor Corp.
  • Amphenol Corp.
  • Applied Optoelectronics Inc.
  • Broadcom Corp.
  • Champion ONE
  • ColorChip Inc.
  • Credo Semiconductor Inc.
  • Effdon Networks Ltd.
  • Eoptolink Technology Inc.
  • eTopus Technology Inc.
  • Finisar Corp.
  • Flex Logix Technologies Inc.
  • Foxconn Interconnect Technology Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd.
  • Fujitsu Optical Components Ltd., a subsidiary of Fujitsu Ltd.
  • Gigalight
  • Hisense Broadband Multimedia Technologies Co. Ltd.
  • Integrated Device Technology Inc.
  • InnoLight Technology Corp.
  • Inphi Corp.
  • Intel Corp.
  • Kaiam Corp.
  • Lumentum Holdings Inc.
  • Luxtera Inc.
  • M/A-COM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc.
  • MaxLinear Inc.
  • Mellanox Technologies Ltd.
  • Menara Networks, a sholly-owned subsidiary of IPG Photonics Corp.
  • Microsemi Corp.
  • Molex Inc., a subsidiary of Koch Industries
  • MoSys Inc.
  • MultiPhy Ltd.
  • NEC Corp.
  • NeoPhotonics Corp.
  • NTT Electronics Corp.
  • Oclaro Inc.
  • OE Solutions Co. Ltd.
  • Oplink Communications LLC, a subsidiary of Molex Inc., which is a subsidiary of Koch Industries
  • Optcore Technology Co. Ltd.
  • ProLabs Ltd.
  • Reflex Photonics Inc.
  • Semtech Corp.
  • Smartoptics AS
  • Source Photonics Inc.
  • Sumitomo Electric Industires Ltd.
  • Xilinx Inc.
Back to Top
전화 문의