Global Information
회사소개 | 문의

리모트 마이크로그리드 기업 12개사의 전략 및 실행 평가

Navigant Research Leaderboard Report - Remote Microgrid Players: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 12 Remote Microgrid Companies

리서치사 Navigant Research
발행일 2019년 03월 상품 코드 800059
페이지 정보 영문 48 Pages; 20 Tables, Charts & Figures
가격
US $ 3,950 ₩ 4,516,000 PDF & Excel by E-mail (Basic License)
US $ 5,925 ₩ 6,774,000 PDF & Excel by E-mail (Enterprise License)


리모트 마이크로그리드 기업 12개사의 전략 및 실행 평가 Navigant Research Leaderboard Report - Remote Microgrid Players: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 12 Remote Microgrid Companies
발행일 : 2019년 03월 페이지 정보 : 영문 48 Pages; 20 Tables, Charts & Figures

세계의 리모트 마이크로그리드 시장 규모는 2018년에 도입 비용으로 약 30억 달러를 나타냈으며, 2027년까지 102억 달러 이상으로 급증할 전망입니다.

주요 리모트 마이크로그리드(Remote Microgrid) 벤더 12개사의 전략 및 실행력에 대해 평가했으며, 비전, 시장 진출 전략, 제조 전략, 기술, 판매·마케팅, 제품 성능 등 Navigant Research의 독자적인 12개 항목 기준에 근거한 평가와 기업 순위를 제공합니다.

제1장 주요 요약

제2장 시장 개요

  • 리모트 마이크로그리드의 정의
  • 리모트 마이크로그리드 시장 성장 촉진요인
  • 리모트 마이크로그리드 시장 장벽
  • 최근의 리모트 마이크로그리드 시장 동향

제3장 The Navigant Research Leaderboard

  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard : 분류
    • 리더기업(Leaders)
    • 경쟁기업(Contenders)
    • 도전기업(Challengers)
    • 추종기업(Followers)
  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

제4장 기업 순위

  • 리더기업
    • ENGIE
    • ABB
    • Optimal Power Solutions
  • 경쟁기업
    • Schneider Electric
    • EDF
    • Caterpillar
    • OutBack Power
    • Husk Power Systems
    • Powerhive
  • 도전기업
    • Larsen & Toubro
    • PowerGen Renewable Energy
    • juwi

제5장 두문자어 및 약어 리스트

제6장 목차

제7장 도표

제8장 조사 범위 및 방법

KSM 19.03.15

List of Charts and Figures

  • Annual Remote Microgrid Implementation Spending by Region, Base Scenario, World Markets: 2018-2027
  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid
  • ENGIE Strategy and Execution Scores
  • ABB Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Optimal Power Solutions Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Schneider Electric Strategy and Execution Scores
  • EDF Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Caterpillar Strategy and Execution Scores
  • OutBack Power Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Husk Power Systems Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Powerhive Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Larsen & Toubro Strategy and Execution Scores
  • PowerGen Renewable Energy Strategy and Execution Scores
  • juwi Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Remote Microgrid Value Chain Components

List of Tables

  • Annual Remote Microgrid Implementation Spending by Region, Base Scenario, World Markets: 2018-2027
  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Overall Scores
  • Vendor Scores
  • Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria
  • Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria

The market for remote microgrids is evolving. The focus of innovation is now shifting toward business models that reduce capital cost constraints, produce greater standardization, and capture as much of the total available revenue from deployments as possible. Many of these microgrids are designed to reduce diesel fuel consumption by integrating solar PV, distributed wind, or hydropower. In 2018, the global market for remote microgrids represented about $3 billion in implementation spending, and it is expected to jump to more than $10.2 billion by 2027.

Unlike past Leaderboard reports on microgrids that attempted to compare apples to apples in terms of types of companies ranked and focused on controls technology, this report takes a different approach. Rather than narrow the scope of companies to be included, it considered a variety of companies to illustrate the diversity of vendors seeking opportunity in the remote microgrid space. As a result, a value chain capture metric was included, highlighting how different kinds of companies compare on revenue capture from remote microgrid project development.

This Navigant Research Leaderboard examines the strategy and execution of 12 leading remote microgrid companies. Threshold scores determine each vendor's categorization (Leader, Contender, Challenger, etc.). These players are rated on 12 criteria: vision; go-to market strategy; partners; business model innovation; value chain capture; geographic reach; sales, marketing, and distribution; system quality and reliability; project portfolio; pricing; and staying power. Using Navigant Research's proprietary Leaderboard methodology, vendors are profiled, rated, and ranked with the goal of providing industry participants with an objective assessment of these companies' relative strengths and weaknesses in the global remote microgrid market.

Key Questions Addressed:

  • Who are the market leaders in the remote microgrid space?
  • What kinds of companies see big opportunities in this market?
  • Which companies are capturing the majority of remote microgrid value chain revenue?
  • Which large companies are investing in smaller startups?
  • Which controls providers are focused on off-grid distributed energy resources (DER) optimization?
  • Who leads among French companies seeking new remote microgrid markets?

Who Needs This Report:

  • Microgrid developers and controls providers
  • Energy storage manufacturers
  • Reciprocal engine manufacturers
  • Mobile money innovators
  • Foundations and governments focused on energy access
  • Investor community

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1. Market Introduction
  • 1.2. The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1. Defining Remote Microgrids
  • 2.2. Remote Microgrid Market Drivers
    • 2.2.1. Lack of Energy Access in Key Developing World Markets
    • 2.2.2. Incremental Energy Consumption Growth Patterns
    • 2.2.3. Declining Costs of Key Microgrid-Enabling Technologies
    • 2.2.4. Global Energy Access Initiatives
  • 2.3. Remote Microgrid Market Barriers
    • 2.3.1. Private Capital Flowing Primarily to Grid-Tied Microgrids
    • 2.3.2. Subsidies that Support the Status Quo
    • 2.3.3. Energy Theft
    • 2.3.4. Lack of International Standards Targeting Remote Applications
  • 2.4. Recent Global Remote Microgrid Market Trends
    • 2.4.1. Energy as a Service Business Models
    • 2.4.2. Plug-and-Play Modular Microgrids
    • 2.4.3. Larger Players Entering the Market
    • 2.4.4. Remote Microgrid Segments
      • 2.4.4.1. Commodity Extraction
      • 2.4.4.2. Physical Islands
      • 2.4.4.3. Village Electrification

3. The Navigant Research Leaderboard

  • 3.1. The Navigant Research Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1. Leaders
    • 3.1.2. Contenders
    • 3.1.3. Challengers
    • 3.1.4. Followers
  • 3.2. The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1. Leaders
    • 4.1.1. ENGIE
    • 4.1.2. ABB
    • 4.1.3. Optimal Power Solutions
  • 4.2. Contenders
    • 4.2.1. Schneider Electric
    • 4.2.2. EDF
    • 4.2.3. Caterpillar
    • 4.2.4. OutBack Power
    • 4.2.5. Husk Power Systems
    • 4.2.6. Powerhive
  • 4.3. Challengers
    • 4.3.1. Larsen & Toubro
    • 4.3.2. PowerGen Renewable Energy
    • 4.3.3. juwi

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

  • 8.1. Scope of Study
  • 8.2. Sources and Methodology
    • 8.2.1. Vendor Selection
    • 8.2.2. Ratings Scale
      • 8.2.2.1. Score Calculations
    • 8.2.3. Criteria Definitions
      • 8.2.3.1. Strategy
      • 8.2.3.2. Execution
Back to Top
전화 문의
F A Q