¡Ø º» »óǰÀº ¿µ¹® ÀÚ·á·Î Çѱ۰ú ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¿¡ ºÒÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â ³»¿ëÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ì ¿µ¹®À» ¿ì¼±ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤È®ÇÑ °ËÅ並 À§ÇØ ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¸¦ Âü°íÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â À§¼º IoTÀÇ °æÀï µ¿ÇâÀ» Á¶»çÇϰí, ·¹°Å½Ã À§¼º »ç¾÷ÀÚ¿Í IoT-NTN Àü¹® »ç¾÷ÀÚÀÇ »ó¾÷Àû, ±â¼úÀû Â÷ÀÌÁ¡, °¢ »ç¾÷ÀÚÀÇ À§¼º IoT ¿¬°á ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ ¹× À§¼º À¯Çüº° 8³â ¿¹Ãø, ¿ëµµº° °æÀï ºÐ¼® µîÀ» Á¤¸®Çß½À´Ï´Ù.
½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ ÀåÁ¡:
- Iridium°ú °°Àº ·¹°Å½Ã ±â¾÷ÀÌ IoT-NTN(ºñÁö»ó¸Á) ¼ºñ½º¸¦ µµÀÔÇÔÀ¸·Î½á À§¼º IoT ½ÃÀåÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô º¯ÈÇÒ °ÍÀÎÁö ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
- µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ IoT ½ÃÀå°ú Ç¥ÁØ ±â¹Ý À§¼º »ç¾÷ÀÚ°¡ ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î Ÿ°ÙÆÃÇÏ´Â IoT ½ÃÀåÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
- IoT ÀÌ¿ë »ç·Ê¿¡¼ Àú±Ëµµ(LEO) À§¼º ¿¬°áÀÇ Àå´ÜÁ¡À» »ìÆìº¼ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
Áß¿äÇÑ Áú¹®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´äº¯ :
- ÇâÈÄ ¾î¶² ·¹°Å½Ã À§¼º »ç¾÷ÀÚ°¡ Ç¥ÁØ ±â¹Ý ¼ºñ½º¸¦ µµÀÔÇÒ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ³ôÀº°¡?
- Sateliot°ú °°Àº IoT-NTN Àü¹® »ç¾÷ÀÚ¿¡ ºñÇØ ·¹°Å½Ã »ç¾÷ÀÚ´Â ¾î¶² ÀÌÁ¡ÀÌ Àִ°¡?
- Ç¥ÁØ ±â¹Ý ¿É¼Çº¸´Ù µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ À§¼º ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀ» ¼±È£ÇÏ´Â IoT ½ÃÀåÀº ¾îµðÀΰ¡?
Á¶»ç ÇÏÀ̶óÀÌÆ®:
- ·¹°Å½Ã IoT-NTN »ç¾÷ÀÚ¿Í IoT-NTN Àü¹® »ç¾÷ÀÚÀÇ »ó¾÷Àû, ±â¼úÀû Â÷À̸¦ ºñ±³ÇÑ »ó¼¼ÇÑ Á¤¼ºÀû Æò°¡
- ·¹°Å½Ã IoT-NTN »ç¾÷ÀÚ¿Í IoT-NTN Àü¹® »ç¾÷ÀÚÀÇ À§¼º IoT Á¢¼ÓÀ» ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ ¹× À§¼º À¯Çüº°·Î 8³â°£ Àü¸Á
- Â÷·® °ü¸®, ÀÚ»ê ÃßÀû µî ¿ëµµº° À§¼º IoT°æÀï ±¸µµ ºÐ¼®
¸ñÂ÷
Á¦1Àå ÁÖ¿ä Á¶»ç °á°ú
Á¦2Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿¹Ãø
Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷°ú ¿¡ÄڽýºÅÛ
- ·¹°Å½Ã À§¼ºÅë½Å »ç¾÷ÀÚ
- IOT-NTN ¿ÀÆÛ·¹ÀÌÅÍ
- º¯ÈÇÏ´Â °æÀï ±¸µµ
Á¦4Àå ·¹°Å½Ã »ç¾÷ÀÚ¿Í IoT-NTN ¿ÀÆÛ·¹ÀÌÅÍ ÁøÈ
- ·¹°Å½Ã »ç¾÷ÀÚ¿Í IoT-NTN Ÿ°Ù ½ÃÀå
- ·¹°Å½Ã À§¼ºÅë½Å »ç¾÷ÀÚ°¡ ±â¹ÎÇÏ°Ô IoT-NTN ½ÃÀå¿¡ Âü¿©
- IOT-NTN´Â LEO ±â¹Ý ·¹°Å½Ã À§¼º ¿î¿µ »ç¶÷¿¡°Ô ÀÖ¾î¼ µ¶Æ¯ÇÑ ±âȸ
Á¦5Àå °á·Ð
LSH 25.01.24
Actionable Benefits:
- Understand how the satellite Internet of Things (IoT) market will change as legacy players like Iridium introduce IoT-Non-Terrestrial Network (NTN) services.
- Learn which IoT markets proprietary and standards-based satellite operators typically target.
- Consider the advantages and drawbacks of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite connectivity for IoT use cases.
Critical Questions Answered:
- Which legacy satellite operators will likely introduce a standards-based service in the future?
- What advantages do legacy players have over dedicated IoT-NTN operators like Sateliot?
- Which IoT markets will favor proprietary satellite protocols over a standards-based option?
Research Highlights:
- An in-depth qualitative assessment comparing the commercial and technical differences between legacy and dedicated IoT-NTN operators.
- Eight-year forecasts measuring legacy and dedicated IoT-NTN operator satellite IoT connections by protocol and satellite type.
- A satellite IoT competitive landscape analysis by application market, including fleet management and asset tracking.
Who Should Read This?
- Go-to-market strategists in legacy satellite organizations determining the benefits of a standards-based solution.
- IoT users in fleet management, asset tracking, or condition-based monitoring markets discerning which satellite type will best serve future use cases.
- Decision makers within dedicated IoT-NTN organizations looking to understand how legacy players will compete with their standards-based solutions in the future.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 KEY FINDINGS
2 KEY FORECASTS
3 KEY COMPANIES AND ECOSYSTEMS
- 3.1 LEGACY SATELLITE OPERATORS
- 3.2 IOT-NTN OPERATORS
- 3.3 A SHIFTING COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
4 LEGACY AND IOT-NTN OPERATOR EVOLUTION
- 4.1 LEGACY VERSUS IOT-NTN TARGET MARKETS
- 4.2 LEGACY SATELLITE OPERATORS ENTER THE IOT-NTN MARKET WITH AGILITY
- 4.3 IOT-NTN IS A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY FOR LEO-BASED LEGACY SATELLITE OPERATORS
5 CONCLUSION