시장보고서
상품코드
1262769

저침습성 척추 기술 시장 : 세계 및 지역별 분석 - 증상별, 최종사용자별, 국가별 분석 - 분석과 예측(2022-2032년)

Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market - A Global and Regional Analysis: Focus on Condition, End User Analysis, and Country Analysis - Analysis and Forecast, 2022-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: BIS Research | 페이지 정보: 영문 | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

※ 본 상품은 영문 자료로 한글과 영문 목차에 불일치하는 내용이 있을 경우 영문을 우선합니다. 정확한 검토를 위해 영문 목차를 참고해주시기 바랍니다.

세계의 저침습성 척추 기술 시장 규모는 2022년에 31억 8,090만 달러를 기록했으며, 2032년에는 94억 650만 달러에 달할 것으로 예측되고 있습니다.

예측 기간인 2022-2032년 CAGR은 11.45%에 달할 전망입니다. 저침습성 척추 기술 시장의 성장은 세계에서 저침습척추 외과수술에 대한 선호도가 높아지고 있는 것과 개업의 사이에서 시뮬레이션, 트레이닝, 지속적 의학 교육에 대한 의식이 높아지고 있는 것이 배경에 있는 것으로 예상됩니다.

세계의 저침습성 척추 기술 시장에 대해 조사했으며, 시장의 개요와 증상별, 최종사용자별, 지역별 동향 및 시장에 참여하는 기업의 개요 등을 제공하고 있습니다.

목차

제1장 시장

  • 세계 시장의 전망
  • 업계의 전망
  • 세계의 저침습성 척추 기술에 대한 COVID-19의 영향
  • 비즈니스 역학

제2장 세계의 저침습성 척추 기술 시장(증상별)

  • 개요
  • 기회 평가
  • 추간판 헤르니아
  • 척주관협착증
  • 변성 추간판 질환
  • 척주 변형
  • 척추 골절
  • 척수 감염증
  • 척수 종양

제3장 세계의 저침습성 척추 기술 시장(최종사용자별)

  • 개요
  • 기회 평가
  • 병원
  • 외래 수술 센터
  • 정형외과 클리닉

제4장 세계의 저침습성 척추 기술 시장(지역별)

  • 북미
  • 유럽
  • 아시아태평양
  • 라틴아메리카
  • 중동·아프리카

제5장 경쟁 벤치마킹과 기업 개요

  • 경쟁 구도
  • 기업 개요
    • AMS Group
    • Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
    • Aurora Spine, Inc.
    • B. Braun SE
    • Boston Scientific Corporation
    • Globus Medical, Inc.
    • Johnson & Johnson
    • Medtronic plc
    • NuVasive, Inc.
    • ORTHOFIX MEDICAL INC.
    • Precision Spine, Inc.
    • Richard Wolf GmbH
    • Spineart
    • Spineology Inc.
    • Stryker Corporation
KSA 23.04.28

“Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market to Reach $9,406.5 Million by 2032.”

Industry Overview

The global minimally invasive spine technologies market was valued at $3,180.9 million in 2022 and is anticipated to reach $9,406.5 million by 2032, witnessing a CAGR of 11.45% during the forecast period 2022-2032. The growth in the global minimally invasive spine technologies market is expected to be driven by the rising preference for minimally invasive spine surgical procedures globally and increasing awareness among practitioners for simulation, training, and continuous medical education.

Market Lifecycle Stage

The minimally invasive spine technologies market is in the developing phase. The rising demand for minimally invasive surgeries and robotic-assisted surgeries and increasing synergetic activities within the spine surgery industry are some of the major opportunities in the global minimally invasive spine technologies market. Furthermore, some of the key trends going on in the market are the technological advancements in the field of medical surgery, such as the incorporation of AI, the shift of procedures to ambulatory surgery centers, and increasing synergistic activities.

Impact of COVID-19

The demand for minimally invasive spine technologies witnessed a decline during the pandemic owing to postponing of elective surgeries and other non-urgent procedures. Most of the spinal surgeons' work was eliminated with the closure of elective surgery and outpatient clinics. It was crucial that emergency spinal care was provided throughout the pandemic, including the development of guidelines to help spinal surgeons properly handle patients.

Furthermore, lockdowns and travel restrictions during the pandemic caused delays in the procurement of raw materials as well as delivery to end users.

Market Segmentation:

Segmentation 1: by Condition

  • Herniated Disc
  • Spinal Stenosis
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • Spinal Deformity
  • Spinal Fracture
  • Spinal Infection
  • Spinal Tumor

The global minimally invasive spine technologies market in the Condition type segment is expected to be dominated by the degenerative disc disease segment.

Segmentation 2: by End User

  • Hospitals
  • Ambulatory Surgery Centers
  • Orthopedic Clinics

The global minimally invasive spine technologies market in the end user segment is expected to be dominated by the hospitals segment.

Segmentation 3: by Region

  • North America - U.S. and Canada
  • Europe - Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Spain, and Rest-of-Europe
  • Asia-Pacific - Japan, China, India, Australia, South Korea, and Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America - Brazil, Mexico, and Rest-of-Latin America
  • Middle East and Africa - South Africa, U.A.E, and Rest-of-Middle East and Africa

Recent Developments in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market

  • In June 2022, NuVasive, Inc. opened its Singapore Experience Center for the Asia-Pacific region to support the company's growth and increase its global footprint.
  • In April 2022, SeaSpine launched the Reef TA (TLIF Articulating) Interbody System. This new system is engineered to deliver an interbody to the front part of the spinal disc space with precision, with the aim of enhancing sagittal alignment and endplate support. The Reef TA Interbody System offers a variety of footprint and lordotic options, giving surgeons the flexibility to address specific anatomical requirements during the surgical procedure.
  • In October 2022, Orthofix and SeaSpine merged as equals to form a leading global company in the spine and orthopedics industry.
  • In July 2022, Medtronic plc received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its latest version of the UNiD Spine Analyzer, which includes a predictive model for degenerative spinal surgery.
  • In October 2022, Captiva Spine entered into an exclusive strategic partnership with REMEX Medical for Spine Navigation and Robotics for the expansion of their product portfolio.

Demand - Drivers and Limitations

The following are the drivers for the minimally invasive spine technologies market:

  • Increasing Incidences and Prevalence of Spinal Disorders
  • Increasing Preference for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeries
  • Technological Advancement in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgical Procedures

The market is expected to face some limitations due to the following challenges:

  • Lack of Well-Established Landscape for Reimbursement for Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures
  • High Cost of Capital Equipment Purchases and Disposables
  • Lack of Training Leading to Shortage of Skilled Professionals

How can this report add value to an organization?

  • Product/Innovation Strategy: The condition segment helps the reader understand the different types of diseases and their effective treatment using minimally invasive spine surgical techniques available for use in the minimally invasive spine technologies industry. Moreover, the study gives the reader an insight into different applications and robotic-assisted surgeries by end users (hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, and orthopedic clinics).
  • Growth/Marketing Strategy: The global minimally invasive spine technologies market has seen major developments by key players operating in the market, such as partnerships, collaborations and business expansions, mergers and acquisitions, product launches, and funding activities. The favored strategy for the companies has been new offerings in the minimally invasive spine technologies market. For instance, in November 2022, Nuvasive, Inc. launched the NuVasive Tube System (NTS) and the Excavation Micro, an innovative minimally invasive surgical system that offers complete solutions for both transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and decompression procedures. These new products expand the company's range of access and instrumentation technology offerings as part of the NuVasive P360 portfolio.
  • Competitive Strategy: Key players in the global minimally invasive spine technologies market analyzed and profiled in the study involve players that offer surgical systems, instruments, and systems. Moreover, a detailed market share analysis of the players operating in the global minimally invasive spine technologies market has been done to help the reader understand how players stack against each other, presenting a clear market landscape. Additionally, comprehensive competitive strategies such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations will aid the reader in understanding the untapped revenue pockets in the market.

Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis

The companies that are profiled have been selected based on inputs gathered from primary experts and analyzing company coverage, product portfolio, and market penetration.

Key Companies Profiled:

  • AMS Group
  • Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
  • Aurora Spine, Inc.
  • B. Braun SE
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Globus Medical, Inc.
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Medtronic plc
  • NuVasive, Inc.
  • ORTHOFIX MEDICAL INC.
  • Precision Spine, Inc.
  • Richard Wolf GmbH
  • Spineart
  • Spineology Inc.
  • Stryker Corporation

Table of Contents

1 Markets

  • 1.1 Global Market Outlook
    • 1.1.1 Market Overview
    • 1.1.2 Product Definition
    • 1.1.3 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
    • 1.1.4 Key Findings
    • 1.1.5 Assumptions and Limitations
    • 1.1.6 Market Growth Scenario
      • 1.1.6.1 Realistic Growth Scenario
      • 1.1.6.2 Optimistic Growth Scenario
      • 1.1.6.3 Pessimistic Growth Scenario
  • 1.2 Industry Outlook
    • 1.2.1 Key Trends
    • 1.2.2 Opportunity Assessment
    • 1.2.3 Patent Analysis
      • 1.2.3.1 Awaited Technological Developments
      • 1.2.3.2 Patent Filing Trend (by Country)
      • 1.2.3.3 Patent Filing Trend (by Year)
    • 1.2.4 Product Benchmarking
    • 1.2.5 Clinical Trials
  • 1.3 Impact of COVID-19 on the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies
    • 1.3.1 Pre-COVID-19 Phase
    • 1.3.2 During COVID-19
    • 1.3.3 Post-COVID-19 Phase
      • 1.3.3.1 Impact on Demand and Supply
      • 1.3.3.2 Impact on Competitive Landscape
      • 1.3.3.3 Impact on Company Revenue
  • 1.4 Business Dynamics
    • 1.4.1 Impact Analysis
    • 1.4.2 Business Drivers
      • 1.4.2.1 Increasing Incidences and Prevalence of Spinal Disorders
      • 1.4.2.2 Increasing Preference for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeries
      • 1.4.2.3 Technological Advancement in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgical Procedures
    • 1.4.3 Business Restraints
      • 1.4.3.1 Lack of Well-Established Landscape for Reimbursement for Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures
      • 1.4.3.2 Factors Hindering the Implementation of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries
        • 1.4.3.2.1 High Cost of Capital Equipment Purchases and Disposables
        • 1.4.3.2.2 Lack of Training Leading to Shortage of Skilled Professionals
    • 1.4.4 Business Opportunities
      • 1.4.4.1 Augmentation of Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
      • 1.4.4.2 Leveraging Synergies to Diversify Business Portfolio

2 Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market (by Condition)

  • 2.1 Overview
  • 2.2 Opportunity Assessment
  • 2.3 Herniated Disc
  • 2.4 Spinal Stenosis
  • 2.5 Degenerative Disc Disease
  • 2.6 Spinal Deformity
  • 2.7 Spinal Fracture
  • 2.8 Spinal Infection
  • 2.9 Spinal Tumor

3 Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market (by End User)

  • 3.1 Overview
  • 3.2 Opportunity Assessment
  • 3.3 Hospitals
  • 3.4 Ambulatory Surgery Centers
  • 3.5 Orthopedic Clinics

4 Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market (by Region)

  • 4.1 North America Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
    • 4.1.1 Regulatory Framework
    • 4.1.2 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
    • 4.1.3 Market Dynamics
      • 4.1.3.1 Impact Analysis
    • 4.1.4 Market Sizing and Forecast
      • 4.1.4.1 North America Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market (by Country)
        • 4.1.4.1.1 U.S.
          • 4.1.4.1.1.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.1.4.1.1.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.1.4.1.2 Canada
          • 4.1.4.1.2.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.1.4.1.2.2 Market Size and Forecast
  • 4.2 Europe Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
    • 4.2.1 Regulatory Framework
      • 4.2.1.1 Spinal Classification EU MDR Model Proposed by Team NB
    • 4.2.2 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
    • 4.2.3 Market Dynamics
      • 4.2.3.1 Impact Analysis
    • 4.2.4 Market Sizing and Forecast
      • 4.2.4.1 Europe Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market (by Country)
        • 4.2.4.1.1 Germany
          • 4.2.4.1.1.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.2.4.1.1.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.2.4.1.2 U.K.
          • 4.2.4.1.2.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.2.4.1.2.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.2.4.1.3 France
          • 4.2.4.1.3.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.2.4.1.3.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.2.4.1.4 Italy
          • 4.2.4.1.4.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.2.4.1.4.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.2.4.1.5 Spain
          • 4.2.4.1.5.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.2.4.1.5.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.2.4.1.6 Rest-of-Europe
          • 4.2.4.1.6.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.2.4.1.6.2 Market Size and Forecast
  • 4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 4.3.1 Regulatory Framework
    • 4.3.2 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
    • 4.3.3 Market Dynamics
      • 4.3.3.1 Impact Analysis
    • 4.3.4 Market Sizing and Forecast Analysis
      • 4.3.4.1 Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market (by Country)
        • 4.3.4.1.1 Japan
          • 4.3.4.1.1.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.3.4.1.1.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.3.4.1.2 China
          • 4.3.4.1.2.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.3.4.1.2.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.3.4.1.3 Australia
          • 4.3.4.1.3.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.3.4.1.3.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.3.4.1.4 India
          • 4.3.4.1.4.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.3.4.1.4.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.3.4.1.5 South Korea
          • 4.3.4.1.5.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.3.4.1.5.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.3.4.1.6 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
          • 4.3.4.1.6.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.3.4.1.6.2 Market Size and Forecast
  • 4.4 Latin America
    • 4.4.1 Regulatory Framework
    • 4.4.2 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
    • 4.4.3 Market Dynamics
      • 4.4.3.1 Impact Analysis
    • 4.4.4 Market Sizing and Forecast Analysis
      • 4.4.4.1 Latin America Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market (by Country)
        • 4.4.4.1.1 Brazil
          • 4.4.4.1.1.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.4.4.1.1.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.4.4.1.2 Mexico
          • 4.4.4.1.2.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.4.4.1.2.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.4.4.1.3 Rest-of-Latin America
          • 4.4.4.1.3.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.4.4.1.3.2 Market Size and Forecast
  • 4.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 4.5.1 Regulatory Framework
    • 4.5.2 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
    • 4.5.3 Market Dynamics
      • 4.5.3.1 Impact Analysis
    • 4.5.4 Market Sizing and Forecast Analysis
      • 4.5.4.1 Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market (by Country)
        • 4.5.4.1.1 South Africa
          • 4.5.4.1.1.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.5.4.1.1.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.5.4.1.2 U.A.E
          • 4.5.4.1.2.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.5.4.1.2.2 Market Size and Forecast
        • 4.5.4.1.3 Rest-of-Middle East and Africa
          • 4.5.4.1.3.1 Market Dynamics
          • 4.5.4.1.3.2 Market Size and Forecast

5 Competitive Benchmarking and Company Profiles

  • 5.1 Competitive Landscape
    • 5.1.1 Key Strategies and Developments
      • 5.1.1.1 Regulatory and Legal Activities
      • 5.1.1.2 New Offerings
      • 5.1.1.3 Mergers and Acquisitions
      • 5.1.1.4 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Business Expansions
  • 5.2 Company Profiles
    • 5.2.1 AMS Group
      • 5.2.1.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.1.2 Role of AMS Group in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.1.3 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.2 Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
      • 5.2.2.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.2.2 Role of Alphatec Holdings, Inc. in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.2.3 Financials
      • 5.2.2.4 Recent Developments
      • 5.2.2.5 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.3 Aurora Spine, Inc.
      • 5.2.3.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.3.2 Role of Aurora Spine, Inc. in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.3.3 Recent Developments
      • 5.2.3.4 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.4 B. Braun SE
      • 5.2.4.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.4.2 Role of B. Braun SE in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.4.3 Product Portfolio
      • 5.2.4.4 Financials
      • 5.2.4.5 Analyst Perception
    • 5.2.5 Boston Scientific Corporation
      • 5.2.5.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.5.2 Role of Boston Scientific Corporation in the Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.5.3 Product Portfolio
      • 5.2.5.4 Financials
      • 5.2.5.5 Analyst Perception
    • 5.2.6 Globus Medical, Inc.
      • 5.2.6.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.6.2 Role of Globus Medical, Inc. in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.6.3 Financials
      • 5.2.6.4 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.7 Johnson & Johnson
      • 5.2.7.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.7.2 Role of Johnson & Johnson in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.7.3 Product Portfolio
      • 5.2.7.4 Financials
      • 5.2.7.5 Recent Developments
      • 5.2.7.6 Analyst Perception
    • 5.2.8 Medtronic plc
      • 5.2.8.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.8.2 Role of Medtronic plc in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.8.3 Product Portfolio
      • 5.2.8.4 Financials
      • 5.2.8.5 Recent Developments
      • 5.2.8.6 Analyst Perception
    • 5.2.9 NuVasive, Inc.
      • 5.2.9.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.9.2 Role of NuVasive, Inc. in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.9.3 Financials
      • 5.2.9.4 Recent Developments
      • 5.2.9.5 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.10 ORTHOFIX MEDICAL INC.
      • 5.2.10.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.10.2 Role of ORTHOFIX MEDICAL INC. in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.10.3 Financials
      • 5.2.10.4 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.11 Precision Spine, Inc.
      • 5.2.11.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.11.2 Role of Precision Spine, Inc. in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.11.3 Recent Developments
      • 5.2.11.4 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.12 Richard Wolf GmbH
      • 5.2.12.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.12.2 Role of Richard Wolf GmbH in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.12.3 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.13 Spineart
      • 5.2.13.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.13.2 Role of Spineart in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.13.3 Recent Developments
      • 5.2.13.4 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.14 Spineology Inc.
      • 5.2.14.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.14.2 Role of Spineology Inc. in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.14.3 Recent Developments
      • 5.2.14.4 Analyst Perspective
    • 5.2.15 Stryker Corporation
      • 5.2.15.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.15.2 Role of Stryker Corporation in the Global Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
      • 5.2.15.3 Financials
      • 5.2.15.4 Recent Developments
      • 5.2.15.5 Analyst Perspective
비교리스트
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
상품 비교하기
전체삭제