![]() |
½ÃÀ庸°í¼
»óǰÄÚµå
1719027
¼¼°èÀÇ ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀå : Á¦°ø Á¦Ç°º°, Àü°³ ¸ðµ¨º°, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ ¾÷°èº°, Áö¿ªº°, µ¿Ç⠺м®, °æÀï ±¸µµ, ¿¹Ãø(2019-2031³â)Identity Security Posture Management Market, By Offering; By Deployment Model; By End User Industry; By Region, Global Trend Analysis, Competitive Landscape & Forecast, 2019-2031 |
¼¼°èÀÇ ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) 2031³â±îÁö 3¹è ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 460¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ Àü¸Á
Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ³×ÀÌÆ¼ºê ȯ°æ ¹× Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® º¸¾È ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀÌ °¡¼ÓÈµÇ¸é¼ ID Áß½ÉÀÇ »çÀ̹ö °ø°ÝÀ» ¼±Á¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ¹æ¾îÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺ÀÌ Ä¿Áü¿¡ µû¶ó ±Û·Î¹ú ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀåÀÌ ±Þ¼ºÀåÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
¼±µµÀûÀÎ Àü·« ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ ¹× ½ÃÀå Á¶»ç ±â°üÀÎ BlueWeave ConsultingÀº ÃÖ±Ù ¿¬±¸¿¡¼ 2024³â ±Û·Î¹ú ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¸¦ 149¾ï 4,400¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤Çß½À´Ï´Ù. 2025³âºÎÅÍ 2031³â±îÁöÀÇ ¿¹Ãø ±â°£ µ¿¾È ±Û·Î¹ú ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â ¿¬Æò±Õ 17.4%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2031³â¿¡´Â 459¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î BlueWeave´Â ¿¹»óÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå µµÀÔÀÇ À¶ÇÕ, »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È À§ÇùÀÇ Áõ°¡, ¿ø°Ý ¹× ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¾÷¹« ¸ðµ¨·ÎÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ÀüȯÀº ±Û·Î¹ú ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ÃßÁø ¿äÀÎÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ISPM ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº ÀÌÁ¦ µðÁöÅÐ ID, ¾×¼¼½º ±ÇÇÑ, º¸¾È Á¤Ã¥ÀÇ º¹À⼺À» °ü¸®ÇÏ°í ¹«´Ü ¾×¼¼½º ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Ä§ÇØ¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ À§ÇèÀ» È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ÏÈÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ƯÈ÷ GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA µî ±ÔÁ¦°¡ °ÈµÇ¸é¼ °·ÂÇÑ ISPM ±¸Çö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ä±¸°¡ ´õ¿í ÁõÆøµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. 84%ÀÇ »ç°íÀ²À̶ó´Â ID Á¤ÀÇ º¸¾È ¿¬ÇÕÀÇ º¸°í¼¿¡¼ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖµíÀÌ ¿î¿µ º¸¾È »ç°íÀÇ ºóµµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó º¸¾È Àü·« °ÈÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ °Á¶µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¶Á÷µéÀº ISPM¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¸¦ Á¤Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, »ó´ç¼öÀÇ Á¶Á÷ÀÌ ¿¹»êÀ» ´Ã¸± °èȹÀ» ¼¼¿ì°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ÁöÁ¤ÇÐÀû ±äÀå °íÁ¶°¡ ±Û·Î¹ú ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀå¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
ÁöÁ¤ÇÐÀû ±äÀåÀÌ ½ÉȵǸé ÁÖ·Î »çÀ̹ö À§ÇùÀÇ ÁõÆø, ±ÔÁ¦ º¹À⼺ Áõ°¡, º¸¾È ÅõÀÚÀÇ Àü·«Àû º¯È·Î ÀÎÇØ ±Û·Î¹ú ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀå¿¡ Â÷ÁúÀ» ºúÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±¹°¡°¡ ÈÄ¿øÇÏ´Â »çÀ̹ö °ø°Ý°ú Á¤±³ÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Ä§ÇØ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¶Á÷Àº ID º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ °ÈÇØ¾ß Çϸç, ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó °·ÂÇÑ ISPM ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¿©·¯ Áö¿ª¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ¾ö°ÝÇϰí Á¾Á¾ »óÀÌÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£¹ý°ú ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö ¿ä±¸»çÇ×ÀÌ È®»êµÇ¸é¼ ±¸Çö ¹®Á¦°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿© ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ °ü°è¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¹«¿ª Á¦ÇѰú °ø±Þ¸Á Áß´ÜÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ź·ÂÀûÀÎ º¸¾È Àü·«ÀÇ °³¹ßÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, ISPM µµÀÔÀ» °¡¼ÓÈÇÏ´Â µ¿½Ã¿¡ ƯÁ¤ Áö¿ª¿¡¼ ½ÃÀå È®´ë¸¦ Á¦¾àÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ºñ¿ë ¹× ±ÔÁ¦ Àå¾Ö¹°ÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÕ´Ï´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ±â¾÷µéÀº ÁöÁ¤ÇÐÀû ºÒ¾ÈÁ¤¼º°ú °ü·ÃµÈ À§ÇèÀ» ¿ÏÈÇϱâ À§ÇØ Æ÷°ýÀûÀÎ º¸¾È Á¶Ä¡¸¦ ¿ì¼±½ÃÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±× °á°ú ¼ºÀå °¡¼ÓÈ¿Í ±ÔÁ¦ °í·Á »çÇ×ÀÇ ÁøÈ¸¦ Ư¡À¸·Î ÇÏ´Â ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå ȯ°æÀÌ Á¶¼ºµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ºÏ¹Ì°¡ ¼¼°èÀÇ ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀåÀ» ¼±µµ
HIPAA, CCPA, ¼º¥½º ¿Á½½¸®¹ý µî ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺸¦ È®º¸Çϱâ À§ÇØ °ß°íÇÑ ¾ÆÀ̵§Æ¼Æ¼ º¸¾È ´ëÃ¥ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦°¡ Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ºÏ¹Ì´Â ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö¸¦ À§ÇØ °·ÂÇÑ ID º¸¾È Á¶Ä¡°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ HIPAA, CCPA, »çº£ÀÎÁî-¿Á½½¸®¹ý(Sarbanes-Oxley Act)°ú °°Àº ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦ Àǹ«·Î ÀÎÇØ ±Û·Î¹ú ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀåÀ» °è¼Ó ÁÖµµÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µðÁöÅÐ ±â¼ú, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¼ºñ½º, ¿ø°Ý ±Ù¹« ȯ°æÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ È®»êÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ID °ü·Ã º¸¾È À§Çù¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³ëÃâÀÌ ÁõÆøµÇ¾î °í±Þ ISPM ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ IBM, Microsoft, Okta¸¦ ºñ·ÔÇÑ ÁÖ¿ä ¾÷°è Âü¿©ÀÚµéÀÌ ÀÌ Áö¿ª¿¡ ÁýÁߵǾî ÀÖ¾î Çõ½Å°ú ½ÃÀå È®´ë°¡ ÃËÁøµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ¹Ì±¹Àº 2024³â ±âÁØ ½ÃÀå ¸ÅÃâ¿¡¼ ¼±µµÀûÀÎ À§Ä¡¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â Æ÷°ýÀûÀÎ »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È Àü·«ÀÇ ±âº» ¿ä¼Ò·Î¼ ID º¸¾È¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¶Á÷ÀÇ °Á¶°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ISPM ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖÀ½À» ¹Ý¿µÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
°æÀï ±¸µµ
¼¼°èÀÇ ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷Àº Check Point, Adaptive Shield, Cisco, BeyondTrust Corporation, CrowdStrike, CyberArk Software Ltd, IBM, Microsoft, Delinea Inc., Okta, Oracle, Microsoft Corp, Palo Alto Networks, Ping Identity, Ping Identity Micro, Silverfort µîÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¹Àº ±â¾÷ÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²À» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇÑ °æÀïÀÌ Ä¡¿ÇØÁö¸é¼ ½ÃÀå °æÀïÀÌ ½Éȵǰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¾÷µéÀº ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²À» ´õ¿í ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇØ Àμö ÇÕº´, ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê, ÇÕÀÛ ÅõÀÚ, ¶óÀ̼±½º °è¾à, ½ÅÁ¦Ç° Ãâ½Ã µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àü·«À» »ç¿ëÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ º¸°í¼ÀÇ ½ÉÃþ ºÐ¼®Àº ¼ºÀå ÀáÀç·Â, ÇâÈÄ µ¿Çâ ¹× ±Û·Î¹ú ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸®(ISPM) ½ÃÀå Åë°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Àüü ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð ¿¹ÃøÀ» ÁÖµµÇÏ´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» °Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â ÀÇ»ç °áÁ¤±ÇÀÚ°¡ ¿Ã¹Ù¸¥ Àü·«Àû °áÁ¤À» ³»¸®´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀ̵Ǵ ±Û·Î¹ú ID º¸¾È ż¼ °ü¸® (ISPM) ½ÃÀåÀÇ Ãֽбâ¼ú µ¿Çâ°ú ¾÷°è ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» Á¦°ø ÇÒ °ÍÀ» ¾à¼ÓÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, °úÁ¦ ¹× °æÀï ¿ªÇÐ °ü°èµµ ºÐ¼®ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market Triples Its Size to Reach USD 46 Billion by 2031
Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market is flourishing because of the growing urgency to proactively mitigate identity-centric cyberattacks, coupled with the accelerating transition to cloud-native environments and zero-trust security paradigms.
BlueWeave Consulting, a leading strategic consulting and market research firm, in its recent study, estimated Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market size at USD 14.94 billion in 2024. During the forecast period between 2025 and 2031, BlueWeave expects Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market size to expand at a CAGR of 17.4% reaching a value of USD 45.93 billion by 2031. The convergence of cloud adoption, escalating cybersecurity threats, and the widespread shift to remote and hybrid work models are the major driving factors behind Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market. ISPM solutions are now essential for managing the complexities of digital identities, access entitlements, and security policies, effectively mitigating risks associated with unauthorized access and data breaches. Heightened regulatory pressures, notably GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA, further amplify the demand for robust ISPM implementations. The increasing frequency of operational security incidents, as highlighted by the Identity Defined Security Alliance's report of an 84% incident rate, underscores the critical need for enhanced security strategies. Consequently, organizations are prioritizing investments in ISPM, with a significant percentage planning to increase their budgets. Industry leaders are responding by expanding ISPM capabilities through strategic cloud region deployments and the integration of AI/ML-driven security insights, ensuring adaptability to the evolving threat landscape.
Impact of Escalating Geopolitical Tensions on Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market
Intensifying geopolitical tensions could disrupt the growth of Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market, primarily through the amplification of cyber threats, increased regulatory complexities, and strategic shifts in security investments. The rise in state-sponsored cyberattacks and sophisticated data breaches compels organizations to fortify their identity security frameworks, thereby driving demand for robust ISPM solutions. Concurrently, the proliferation of stringent and often divergent data protection laws and compliance requirements across various regions introduces implementation challenges, impacting market dynamics. Furthermore, the potential for trade restrictions and supply chain disruptions necessitates the development of resilient security strategies, accelerating ISPM adoption while simultaneously presenting cost and regulatory hurdles that may constrain market expansion in certain geographic areas. Consequently, businesses are prioritizing comprehensive security measures to mitigate the heightened risks associated with geopolitical instability, resulting in a dynamic market landscape characterized by both accelerated growth and evolving regulatory considerations.
North America Leads Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market
North America continues to lead Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market, due to stringent regulatory mandates, such as HIPAA, CCPA, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which necessitate robust identity security measures to ensure compliance. The rapid proliferation of digital technologies, cloud-based services, and remote work environments has amplified the exposure to identity-related security threats, thereby driving increased demand for advanced ISPM solutions. Furthermore, the concentration of key industry participants, including IBM, Microsoft, and Okta, within the region facilitates innovation and market expansion. Specifically, the United States has exhibited a leading position in market revenue as of 2024, reflecting a growing organizational emphasis on identity security as a fundamental component of comprehensive cybersecurity strategies, and consequently, the heightened adoption of ISPM solutions.
Competitive Landscape
Major companies in Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market include Check Point, Adaptive Shield, Cisco, BeyondTrust Corporation, CrowdStrike, CyberArk Software Ltd, IBM, Microsoft, Delinea Inc., Okta, Oracle, Microsoft Corp, Palo Alto Networks, Ping Identity, Radiant Logic, Rezonate, SailPoint, Trend Micro, and Silverfort. The presence of high number of companies intensify the market competition as they compete to gain a significant market share. These companies employ various strategies, including mergers and acquisitions, partnerships, joint ventures, license agreements, and new product launches to further enhance their market share.
The in-depth analysis of the report provides information about growth potential, upcoming trends, and Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market statistics. It also highlights the factors driving forecasts of total market size. The report promises to provide recent technology trends in Global Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) Market and industry insights to help decision-makers make sound strategic decisions. Furthermore, the report also analyzes the growth drivers, challenges, and competitive dynamics of the market.
*Financial information of non-listed companies can be provided as per availability.
**The segmentation and the companies are subject to modifications based on in-depth secondary research for the final deliverable