¡Ø º» »óǰÀº ¿µ¹® ÀÚ·á·Î Çѱ۰ú ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¿¡ ºÒÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â ³»¿ëÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ì ¿µ¹®À» ¿ì¼±ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤È®ÇÑ °ËÅ並 À§ÇØ ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¸¦ Âü°íÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
¼¼°è Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀåÀº 2022³â ¾à 4,234¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¸ç, ¿¹Ãø ±â°£ÀÎ 2023³âºÎÅÍ 2030³â±îÁö 6.4% ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¼ºÀå·ü·Î ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.
Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î´Â Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú Àǻ簡 Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼úÀÇ ¼ö¼ú Àü °èȹ°ú ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀ» µ½±â À§ÇØ ¼³°èµÈ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ±â¹Ý ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ǰú µµ±¸¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ µµ±¸´Â ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÇ·á ¿µ»ó µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¿Ü°ú Àǻ簡 ȯºÎ¸¦ ÀÚ¼¼È÷ ½Ã°¢ÈÇÏ°í ºÐ¼®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀåÀº °í·ÉÈ·Î ÀÎÇÑ Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ÁúȯÀÇ À¯º´·ü Áõ°¡¿Í ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ÀÌÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÎ½Ä Áõ°¡ µîÀÇ ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁÖµµµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î´Â ¼ö¼ú±â±¸¿ëÀ¸·Î °³¹ßµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ±âÁ¸ ±â´É¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¹Àº °³¼± »çÇ×°ú ´Ù¾çÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ±â´ÉÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. À¯¿£ÀÌ 2022³â ¹ßÇ¥ÇÑ ÀÚ·á¿¡ µû¸£¸é, 65¼¼ ÀÌ»ó Àα¸´Â 2050³â±îÁö Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î 2¹è ÀÌ»ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿© 2020³â 7¾ï 2,700¸¸ ¸í¿¡¼ 2050³â 15¾ï ¸íÀ¸·Î ´Ã¾î³¯ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í ÇÔ²² ¹Ì±¹ °ñ´Ù°øÁõ Àç´ÜÀÇ º¸°í¿¡ µû¸£¸é °ñ´Ù°øÁõÀ̳ª °ñ·® °¨¼Ò¸¦ °æÇèÇÑ 50¼¼ ÀÌ»ó ³ëÀÎÀº ¾à 5,400¸¸ ¸í¿¡ ´ÞÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¼ýÀÚ´Â 2030³â±îÁö ¾à 6,440¸¸ ¸íÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌó·³ °í·ÉÈ Àα¸ÀÇ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇØ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÀû ¹®Á¦ ¹× Áø´Ü, Ä¡·á, ¼ö¼úÀ» À§ÇØ º´¿øÀ» ã´Â ȯÀÚ ¼öµµ Áõ°¡ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù. ±â¼ú °³¹ßÀÇ ¹ßÀü°ú ºñ¿ë È¿À²ÀûÀÎ Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î´Â ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå¿¡ À¯¸®ÇÑ ±âȸ¸¦ âÃâÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ½ÅÈï±¹¿¡¼´Â ¼÷·ÃµÈ Àü¹®°¡ ºÎÁ·ÀÌ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀÇ °É¸²µ¹·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
¼¼°è Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå Á¶»ç¿¡¼ °í·ÁµÈ ÁÖ¿ä Áö¿ªÀº ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç, ºÏ¹Ì, À¯·´, ¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä« µîÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ºÏ¹Ì´Â ±â¼ú ¹ßÀü, ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå ±â¾÷ÀÇ Á¸Àç, ¹ßÀüµÈ ÀÇ·á ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ 2022³â ½ÃÀåÀ» Àå¾ÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀº °í·ÉÈ Àα¸ÀÇ Áõ°¡¿Í ÀÇ·á ÁöÃâ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇØ ¿¹Ãø ±â°£ µ¿¾È °¡Àå ºü¸£°Ô ¼ºÀåÇÏ´Â Áö¿ªÀ¸·Î °£Áֵ˴ϴÙ.
ÀÌ Á¶»çÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ÃÖ±Ù ¸î ³â°£ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ºÎ¹®°ú ±¹°¡ÀÇ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí ÇâÈÄ ¸î ³â°£ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ±¹°¡ÀÇ »ê¾÷ÀÇ ÁúÀû, ¾çÀû Ãø¸éÀ» ¸ðµÎ Æ÷ÇÔÇϵµ·Ï ¼³°èµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¹Ì·¡ ¼ºÀåÀ» ±ÔÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ÃËÁø¿äÀΰú °úÁ¦¿Í °°Àº Áß¿äÇÑ Ãø¸é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ Á¤º¸µµ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æÀï »óȲ°ú Á¦Ç° Á¦°ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ó¼¼ÇÑ ºÐ¼®°ú ÇÔ²² ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀÌ ÅõÀÚÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹Ì½ÃÀû ½ÃÀå¿¡¼ÀÇ ÀáÀçÀû ±âȸµµ Æ÷ÇÔÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¸ñÂ÷
Á¦1Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à
- ½ÃÀå ÇöȲ
- ¼¼°è ½ÃÀ塤ºÎ¹®º° ½ÃÀå ÃßÁ¤°ú ¿¹Ãø, 2020-2030³â
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå : Áö¿ªº°, 2020-2030³â
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°, 2020-2030³â
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå : Á¦°ø Çüź°, 2020-2030³â
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾ ¿ëµµº°, 2020-2030³â
- ÁÖ¿ä µ¿Çâ
- Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý
- Á¶»ç °¡Á¤
Á¦2Àå Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå Á¤ÀÇ¿Í ¹üÀ§
- Á¶»ç ¸ñÀû
- ½ÃÀå Á¤ÀÇ¿Í ¹üÀ§
- Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ¿¬µµ
- ÅëÈ È¯»êÀ²
Á¦3Àå Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå ¿µÇ⠺м®(2020-2030³â)
- ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
- °í·ÉÈ¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú Áúȯ À¯Çà
- ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ÀÌÁ¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀÎÁöµµ Çâ»ó
- ½ÃÀå °úÁ¦
- ½ÅÈï±¹ÀÇ ¼÷·ÃµÈ Àü¹®°¡ ºÎÁ·
- ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾îÀÇ °íºñ¿ë
- ½ÃÀå ±âȸ
- ±â¼ú °³¹ß Áõ°¡
- ÃÖ¼Òħ½À ¼ö¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡
Á¦4Àå Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : »ê¾÷ ºÐ¼®
- Porter's 5 Force ¸ðµ¨
- °ø±Þ ±â¾÷ÀÇ ±³¼··Â
- ±¸¸ÅÀÚÀÇ ±³¼··Â
- ½Å±Ô Âü¿©¾÷üÀÇ À§Çù
- ´ëüǰÀÇ À§Çù
- °æÀï ±â¾÷°£ °æÀï °ü°è
- Porter's 5 Force ¿µÇ⠺м®
- PEST ºÐ¼®
- Á¤Ä¡Àû
- °æÁ¦
- »çȸ
- 񃬣
- ȯ°æ
- ¹ý·ü
- ÁÖ¿ä ÅõÀÚ ±âȸ
- ÁÖ¿ä ¼º°ø Àü·«
- COVID-19 ¿µÇ⠺м®
- ÆÄ±«Àû µ¿Çâ
- ¾÷°è Àü¹®°¡ÀÇ °üÁ¡
- ¾Ö³Î¸®½ºÆ®ÀÇ °á·Ð°ú Á¦¾È
Á¦5Àå Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°
- ½ÃÀå ÇöȲ
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°, ½ÇÀû - ÀáÀ缺 ºÐ¼®
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°, ÃßÁ¤¡¤¿¹Ãø, 2020-2030³â
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå, ÇÏÀ§ ºÎ¹®º° ºÐ¼®
Á¦6Àå Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : Á¦°ø Çüź°
- ½ÃÀå ÇöȲ
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : Á¦°ø Çüź°, ½ÇÀû - ÀáÀ缺 ºÐ¼®
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : Á¦°ø Çüź°, ÃßÁ¤¡¤¿¹Ãø, 2020-2030³â
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå : ÇÏÀ§ ºÎ¹®º° ºÐ¼®
Á¦7Àå Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾ ¿ëµµº°
- ½ÃÀå ÇöȲ
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾ ¿ëµµº°, ½ÇÀû - ÀáÀ缺 ºÐ¼®
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾ ¿ëµµº°, ÃßÁ¤¡¤¿¹Ãø, 2020-2030³â
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå, ÇÏÀ§ ºÎ¹® ºÐ¼®
Á¦8Àå Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå : Áö¿ªº° ºÐ¼®
- ÁÖ¿ä ±¹°¡
- ÁÖ¿ä ½ÅÈï ±¹°¡
- Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå, Áö¿ªº° ½ÃÀå ÇöȲ
- ºÏ¹Ì
- ¹Ì±¹
- À¯Çüº° ÃßÁ¤¡¤¿¹Ãø, 2020-2030³â
- Á¦°ø Çüź° ÃßÁ¤¡¤¿¹Ãø, 2020-2030³â
- ÃÖÁ¾ ¿ëµµº° ÃßÁ¤¡¤¿¹Ãø, 2020-2030³â
- ij³ª´Ù
- À¯·´ Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå ÇöȲ
- ¿µ±¹
- µ¶ÀÏ
- ÇÁ¶û½º
- ½ºÆäÀÎ
- ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
- ±âŸ À¯·´
- ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå ÇöȲ
- Áß±¹
- Àεµ
- ÀϺ»
- È£ÁÖ
- Çѱ¹
- ±âŸ ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç
- ¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä« Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú °èȹ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå ÇöȲ
- Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«
- »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
- ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ±¹
- ±âŸ Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«
Á¦9Àå °æÀï Á¤º¸
- ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ SWOT ºÐ¼®
- ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Àü·«
- ±â¾÷ °³¿ä
- EOS imaging
- ÁÖ¿ä Á¤º¸
- °³¿ä
- À繫(µ¥ÀÌÅÍ °¡¿ë¼º¿¡ µû¶ó ´Ù¸§)
- Á¦Ç° °³¿ä
- ÃÖ±ÙÀÇ µ¿Çâ
- Formus Labs Ltd.
- Stryker
- Brainlab AG
- Medicad
- PEEK Health S.A
- Radlink Inc.
- Zimmer Biomedical
- Corin Group
- Enhatch Inc.
Á¦10Àå Á¶»ç °úÁ¤
- Á¶»ç °úÁ¤
- µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¸¶ÀÌ´×
- ºÐ¼®
- ½ÃÀå ÃßÁ¤
- °ËÁõ
- ÃâÆÇ
- Á¶»ç ¼Ó¼º
- Á¶»ç °¡Á¤
ksm 23.08.02
Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market is valued approximately at USD 42.34 million in 2022 and is anticipated to grow with a growth rate of more than 6.4% over the forecast period 2023-2030. The orthopedic surgical planning software involves utilization of computer-based applications and tools designed to aid orthopedic surgeons in preoperative planning and simulation for orthopedic surgeries. These tools leverage medical imaging data of patients and enable surgeons to visualize and analyze the affected area in detail. The orthopedic surgical planning software market is driven by factors such as the growing prevalence of orthopedic conditions with aging population and increasing awareness regarding the benefits associated with surgical planning software.
These software has been developed for surgical instruments and includes many improvements to existing functionalities and various new ones. According to the data published by the UN in 2022, the number of people aged 65 years or above is expected to more than double globally by 2050, rising from 727 million in 2020 to 1.5 billion in 2050. Along with that the National Osteoporosis Foundation reports that there were approximately 54 million individuals aged 50 years and above who experienced osteoporosis and low bone mass. This number is projected to increase to approximately 64.4 million by the year 2030. Thus, the increasing aging population is also expected to increase in number of orthopedic problems and hospital visits for diagnosis, treatment, and surgeries. The Increasing technological developments and cost-effective orthopedic surgical planning software creates lucrative opportunities for the market growth. However, the lack of skilled professionals in emerging economies hinders the market growth.
The key regions considered for the Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market study includes Asia Pacific, North America, Europe, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. North America dominated the market in 2022 owing to the technological advancement, presence of key market players and well-developed health care system. Asia-Pacific is considered as the fastest growing region during the forecasted period due to the increasing in aging population and increasing healthcare expenditure.
Major market players included in this report are:
- EOS Imaging
- Formus Labs Ltd
- Stryker
- Brainlab AG
- mediCAD
- PEEK HEALTH S.A.
- Radlink Inc.
- Zimmer Biomet
- RSA Biomedical
- Corin Group
- Enhatch Inc.
Recent Developments in the Market:
- On September 2022, Stryker launched Q Guidance System for spine applications. The system provides more better surgical planning capacity by combining new optical tracking options offered by a modern, redesigned camera with new-gen algorithms.
- On July 2022, Midwest Orthopaedic Center declared the beginning of EHR implementation from health IT vendor eClinicalWorks which is expected to improve clinician workflow and efficacy. The center is likely to implement the eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management solution to increase its financial performance, maximize price transparency, improve the rate of collections, and streamline analytics through real-time dashboard updates.
Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Report Scope:
- Historical Data: 2020 - 2021
- Base Year for Estimation: 2022
- Forecast period: 2023-2030
- Report Coverage: Revenue forecast, Company Ranking, Competitive Landscape, Growth factors, and Trends
- Segments Covered: Type, Delivery, End user, Region
- Regional Scope: North America; Europe; Asia Pacific; Latin America; Middle East & Africa
- Customization Scope: Free report customization (equivalent up to 8 analyst's working hours) with purchase. Addition or alteration to country, regional & segment scope*
The objective of the study is to define market sizes of different segments & countries in recent years and to forecast the values to the coming years. The report is designed to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the industry within countries involved in the study.
The report also caters detailed information about the crucial aspects such as driving factors & challenges which will define the future growth of the market. Additionally, it also incorporates potential opportunities in micro markets for stakeholders to invest along with the detailed analysis of competitive landscape and product offerings of key players. The detailed segments and sub-segment of the market are explained below:
By Type:
- Pre-Operative
- Post-Operative
By Delivery:
By End user:
- Hospitals
- Orthopedic Clinics
By Region:
- North America
- U.S.
- Canada
- Europe
- UK
- Germany
- France
- Spain
- Italy
- ROE
- Asia Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- Australia
- South Korea
- RoAPAC
- Latin America
- Brazil
- Mexico
- Middle East & Africa
- Saudi Arabia
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East & Africa
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Executive Summary
- 1.1. Market Snapshot
- 1.2. Global & Segmental Market Estimates & Forecasts, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
- 1.2.1. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, by region, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
- 1.2.2. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, by Type, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
- 1.2.3. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, by Delivery, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
- 1.2.4. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, by End user, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
- 1.3. Key Trends
- 1.4. Estimation Methodology
- 1.5. Research Assumption
Chapter 2. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Definition and Scope
- 2.1. Objective of the Study
- 2.2. Market Definition & Scope
- 2.2.1. Industry Evolution
- 2.2.2. Scope of the Study
- 2.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 2.4. Currency Conversion Rates
Chapter 3. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Dynamics
- 3.1. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Impact Analysis (2020-2030)
- 3.1.1. Market Drivers
- 3.1.1.1. Prevalence of orthopedic conditions with aging population.
- 3.1.1.2. Increasing awareness regarding the benefits associated with surgical planning software.
- 3.1.2. Market Challenges
- 3.1.2.1. Lack of skilled professionals in emerging economies
- 3.1.2.2. High cost of software
- 3.1.3. Market Opportunities
- 3.1.3.1. Increasing technological developments.
- 3.1.3.2. Growing demand for minimally invasive surgeries
Chapter 4. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market: Industry Analysis
- 4.1. Porter's 5 Force Model
- 4.1.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- 4.1.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
- 4.1.3. Threat of New Entrants
- 4.1.4. Threat of Substitutes
- 4.1.5. Competitive Rivalry
- 4.2. Porter's 5 Force Impact Analysis
- 4.3. PEST Analysis
- 4.3.1. Political
- 4.3.2. Economic
- 4.3.3. Social
- 4.3.4. Technological
- 4.3.5. Environmental
- 4.3.6. Legal
- 4.4. Top investment opportunity
- 4.5. Top winning strategies
- 4.6. COVID-19 Impact Analysis
- 4.7. Disruptive Trends
- 4.8. Industry Expert Perspective
- 4.9. Analyst Recommendation & Conclusion
Chapter 5. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, by Type
- 5.1. Market Snapshot
- 5.2. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market by Type, Performance - Potential Analysis
- 5.3. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Estimates & Forecasts by Type 2020-2030 (USD Million)
- 5.4. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, Sub Segment Analysis
- 5.4.1. Pre-operative
- 5.4.2. Post-operative
Chapter 6. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, by Delivery
- 6.1. Market Snapshot
- 6.2. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market by Delivery, Performance - Potential Analysis
- 6.3. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Estimates & Forecasts by Delivery 2020-2030 (USD Million)
- 6.4. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, Sub Segment Analysis
- 6.4.1. Cloud-Base
- 6.4.2. On-premise
Chapter 7. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, by End user
- 7.1. Market Snapshot
- 7.2. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market by End user, Performance - Potential Analysis
- 7.3. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Estimates & Forecasts by End user 2020-2030 (USD Million)
- 7.4. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, Sub Segment Analysis
- 7.4.1. Hospitals
- 7.4.2. Orthopedic clinics
Chapter 8. Global Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, Regional Analysis
- 8.1. Top Leading Countries
- 8.2. Top Emerging Countries
- 8.3. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market, Regional Market Snapshot
- 8.4. North America Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.4.1. U.S. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.4.1.1. Type breakdown estimates & forecasts, 2020-2030
- 8.4.1.2. Delivery breakdown estimates & forecasts, 2020-2030
- 8.4.1.3. End user breakdown estimates & forecasts, 2020-2030
- 8.4.2. Canada Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.5. Europe Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Snapshot
- 8.5.1. U.K. Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.5.2. Germany Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.5.3. France Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.5.4. Spain Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.5.5. Italy Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.5.6. Rest of Europe Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.6. Asia-Pacific Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Snapshot
- 8.6.1. China Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.6.2. India Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.6.3. Japan Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.6.4. Australia Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.6.5. South Korea Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.6.6. Rest of Asia Pacific Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.7. Latin America Orthopedic surgical planning software Market Snapshot
- 8.7.1. Brazil Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.7.2. Mexico Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.8. Middle East & Africa Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.8.1. Saudi Arabia Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.8.2. South Africa Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
- 8.8.3. Rest of Middle East & Africa Orthopedic surgical planning software Market
Chapter 9. Competitive Intelligence
- 9.1. Key Company SWOT Analysis
- 9.1.1. Company 1
- 9.1.2. Company 2
- 9.1.3. Company 3
- 9.2. Top Market Strategies
- 9.3. Company Profiles
- 9.3.1. EOS imaging
- 9.3.1.1. Key Information
- 9.3.1.2. Overview
- 9.3.1.3. Financial (Subject to Data Availability)
- 9.3.1.4. Product Summary
- 9.3.1.5. Recent Developments
- 9.3.2. Formus Labs Ltd.
- 9.3.3. Stryker
- 9.3.4. Brainlab AG
- 9.3.5. Medicad
- 9.3.6. PEEK Health S.A
- 9.3.7. Radlink Inc.
- 9.3.8. Zimmer Biomedical
- 9.3.9. Corin Group
- 9.3.10. Enhatch Inc.
Chapter 10. Research Process
- 10.1. Research Process
- 10.1.1. Data Mining
- 10.1.2. Analysis
- 10.1.3. Market Estimation
- 10.1.4. Validation
- 10.1.5. Publishing
- 10.2. Research Attributes
- 10.3. Research Assumption