![]() |
½ÃÀ庸°í¼
»óǰÄÚµå
1587924
¼±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ ½ÃÀå : ¼Ö·ç¼Ç À¯Çüº°, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ë »ê¾÷º°, Áö¿ªº°Ship Bridge Simulator Market, By Solution Type, By End-use Industry, By Geography |
¼¼°è ¼±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â 26¾ï 2,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î 2031³â±îÁö 43¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÇ¸ç, 2024³âºÎÅÍ 2031³â±îÁö 7.3%ÀÇ CAGRÀ» ±â·ÏÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.
º¸°í¼ ¹üÀ§ | º¸°í¼ »ó¼¼ | ||
---|---|---|---|
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ | 2023³â | 2024³â ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð | 26¾ï 2,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯ |
½ÇÀû µ¥ÀÌÅÍ | 2019-2023³â | ¿¹Ãø ±â°£ | 2024-2031³â |
¿¹Ãø ±â°£(2024-2031³â) CAGR: | 7.30% | 2031³â ±Ý¾× Àü¸Á | 43¾ï ´Þ·¯ |
¼¼°è ¼±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ ½ÃÀåÀº ÇØ¾ç Àü¹®°¡µéÀÇ ÈÆ·Ã ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇØ ÃÖ±Ù ¸î ³â µ¿¾È ¼ºÀå¼¼¸¦ º¸À̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ´Â ÈÆ·Ã ¹× Æò°¡ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¼±¹Ú ±³·®ÀÇ °¡»ó ȯ°æÀ» »ý¼ºÇÏ´Â ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ¸»ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. À̸¦ ÅëÇØ ÈÆ·Ã»ýµéÀº ½ÇÁ¦ À§Çè ºÎ´ã ¾øÀÌ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Á¶°Ç°ú ½Ã³ª¸®¿À¿¡¼ ¼±¹ÚÀ» Á¶ÀÛÇÏ´Â ½ÇÀü °æÇèÀ» ½×À» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¾ÈÀü ±âÁØÀÌ °ÈµÇ°í ½ÇÁ¦ ¼±¹Ú¿¡ ¹èÄ¡Çϱâ Àü¿¡ ¼±¿øÀ» ÀÎÁõÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î ¼±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Å©°Ô Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î Ãֽм±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ´Â È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÇнÀÀ» Áö¿øÇÏ´Â ¸Å¿ì Çö½ÇÀûÀÎ ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. À̸¦ ÅëÇØ ¼±»ó¿¡¼ÀÇ Á¤»óÀûÀÎ ¾÷¹«¸¦ Áß´ÜÇÏÁö ¾Ê°íµµ ¼±¹Ú Àü¹®°¡¸¦ ÈÆ·Ã½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
¼¼°è ¼±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ ½ÃÀå¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÁÖ¿ä ÃËÁø¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î´Â ¼±¿øµé¿¡°Ô ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅ͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÈÆ·ÃÀ» Àǹ«ÈÇÏ´Â ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ¾ÈÀü ±ÔÁ¤, ÀÚ°ÝÀ» °®Ãá ¼±¿ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä¸¦ Áõ°¡½ÃŰ´Â ÇØ»ó ¹«¿ª Ȱµ¿ÀÇ È®´ë, ÇØ»ç ÈÆ·Ã ±â°ü ¹× ±â¾÷ÀÇ °í±Þ ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ½Ã½ºÅÛ Ã¤Åà Áõ°¡ µîÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª °í±Þ ºê¸®Áö ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ³ôÀº °³¹ß ¹× À¯Áöº¸¼ö ºñ¿ëÀÌ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå¿¡ °É¸²µ¹ÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, °æ±â ºÒÅõ¸í¼ºÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÇØ¿î¾÷°èÀÇ ÅõÀÚ°¡ °¨¼ÒÇϰí ÀÖ´Â °Íµµ ¹®Á¦Á¡À¸·Î ÁöÀûµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Àúºñ¿ë ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍÀÇ °³¹ß°ú ±âÁ¸ ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍÀÇ ¾÷±×·¹À̵忡 ´ëÇÑ °ü½É Áõ°¡´Â ÇâÈÄ ¸î ³â µ¿¾È Å« ±âȸ¸¦ Á¦°øÇÒ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ Á¦Á¶¾÷üµéÀº ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ ±â¹Ý ÈÆ·Ã¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνÄÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó À¯¸®ÇÑ Àü¸ÁÀ» °¡Áú ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ Á¶»çÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä Æ¯Â¡
ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â ¼¼°è ¼±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ ½ÃÀåÀ» »ó¼¼È÷ ºÐ¼®Çϰí 2023³âÀ» ±âÁØ ¿¬µµ·Î ÇÏ¿© ¿¹Ãø ±â°£(2024-2031³â)ÀÇ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿Í ¿¬Æò±Õ ¼ºÀå·ü(CAGR)À» Á¶»çÇÏ¿© Á¤¸®ÇÑ º¸°í¼ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ, ´Ù¾çÇÑ ºÎ¹®¿¡ °ÉÄ£ ÀáÀçÀû ¼öÀÍ ±âȸ¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí, ÀÌ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÎ ÅõÀÚ Á¦¾È ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º¸¦ ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ ½ÃÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ, ±âȸ, ½ÅÁ¦Ç° Ãâ½Ã ¹× ½ÂÀÎ, ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ, Áö¿ªº° Àü¸Á, ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æÀï Àü·« µî¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁÖ¿ä ÀλçÀÌÆ®µµ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
±â¾÷ ÇÏÀ̶óÀÌÆ®, Á¦Ç° Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À, ÁÖ¿ä ÇÏÀ̶óÀÌÆ®, ¼º°ú ¹× Àü·«°ú °°Àº ¸Å°³ º¯¼ö¸¦ ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ¼¼°è ¼±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷À» ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϸµÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷À¸·Î´Â Kongsberg Maritime, Transas(Wartsila), VSTEP, KONGSBERG Digital, Wartsila SAM Electronics, ARI Simulation, Buffalo Computer Graphics( BCG), Force Technology, HR Wallingford, Indra Sistemas µîÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ º¸°í¼ÀÇ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¸¶ÄÉÆÃ ´ã´çÀÚ¿Í ±â¾÷ °æ¿µÁøÀº ÇâÈÄ Á¦Ç° Ãâ½Ã, À¯ÇüÈ, ½ÃÀå È®´ë ¹× ¸¶ÄÉÆÃ Àü·«¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤º¸¿¡ ÀÔ°¢ÇÑ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» ³»¸± ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â ÅõÀÚÀÚ, °ø±Þ¾÷ü, Á¦Ç° Á¦Á¶¾÷ü, À¯Åë¾÷ü, ½Å±Ô ÁøÀÔÀÚ, À繫 ºÐ¼®°¡ µî ¾÷°èÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº ¼¼°è ¼±¹Ú ±³·® ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®¿¡ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àü·« ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» ¿ëÀÌÇÏ°Ô ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
Global ship bridge simulator market is estimated to be valued at USD 2.62 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 4.30 Billion by 2031, exhibiting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.3% from 2024 to 2031.
Report Coverage | Report Details | ||
---|---|---|---|
Base Year: | 2023 | Market Size in 2024: | US$ 2.62 Bn |
Historical Data for: | 2019 To 2023 | Forecast Period: | 2024 To 2031 |
Forecast Period 2024 to 2031 CAGR: | 7.30% | 2031 Value Projection: | US$ 4.30 Bn |
Global ship bridge simulator market has been gaining momentum over the past few years owing to the increasing demand for training marine professionals. A ship bridge simulator refers to a system that creates a virtual environment of a ship's bridge for training and assessment purposes. It enables trainees to gain hands-on experience of operating a vessel in different conditions and scenarios without any real risks. The growing emphasis on safety standards and need for certifying seafarers before deploying them on actual vessels has significantly propelled the demand for ship bridge simulators globally. With advances in simulation technologies, modern bridge simulators provide highly realistic simulations that aid in effective learning. Their usage allows training marine professionals without disrupting regular operations on-board.
The primary drivers influencing the global ship bridge simulator market include stringent safety regulations mandating simulator-based training for seafarers, growing seaborne trade activities raising the demand for qualified crews, and increasing adoption of advanced simulation systems by maritime training institutes and companies. However, high development and maintenance costs associated with sophisticated bridge simulators could hinder the market growth. Moreover, declining investments in the shipping industry due to economic uncertainties poses a challenge. But development of low-cost simulators and rising focus on upgrading existing simulators present significant opportunities in the coming years. The simulator manufacturers are anticipated to witness lucrative prospects with the growing recognition of simulator-based training.
Key Features of the Study
This report provides in-depth analysis of the global ship bridge simulator market, and provides market size (US$ Bn) and compound annual growth rate (CAGR%) for the forecast period (2024-2031), considering 2023 as the base year
It elucidates potential revenue opportunities across different segments and explains attractive investment proposition matrices for this market
This study also provides key insights about market drivers, restraints, opportunities, new product launches or approval, market trends, regional outlook, and competitive strategies adopted by key players
It profiles key players in the global ship bridge simulator market based on the following parameters - company highlights, products portfolio, key highlights, financial performance, and strategies
Key companies covered as a part of this study include Kongsberg Maritime, Transas (Wartsila), VSTEP, KONGSBERG Digital, Wartsila SAM Electronics, ARI Simulation, Buffalo Computer Graphics (BCG), Force Technology, HR Wallingford, and Indra Sistemas
Insights from this report would allow marketers and the management authorities of the companies to make informed decisions regarding their future product launches, type up-gradation, market expansion, and marketing tactics
The global ship bridge simulator market report caters to various stakeholders in this industry including investors, suppliers, product manufacturers, distributors, new entrants, and financial analysts
Stakeholders would have ease in decision-making through various strategy matrices used in analyzing the global ship bridge simulator market.