![]() |
½ÃÀ庸°í¼
»óǰÄÚµå
1442053
½Äµµ¾Ï ½ÃÀå : ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®, ¿ªÇÐ ¹× ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø(-2034³â)Esophageal Cancer - Market Insight, Epidemiology And Market Forecast - 2034 |
½Äµµ¾ÏÀº ½Äµµ(¸ñ¿¡¼ À§±îÁö À½½Ä¹°À» ¿î¹ÝÇÏ´Â ¼ÓÀÌ ºó ±ä ±ÙÀ°°ü)¿¡¼ ¹ß»ýÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ½Äµµ¾ÏÀº ½Äµµ¾ÏÀ̶ó°íµµ Çϸç, ½Äµµ¸¦ µ¤°í ÀÖ´Â ¼¼Æ÷¿¡¼ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¸ç ½Äµµ ³»º®¿¡ ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾çÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿© ¹ßº´ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
½Äµµ ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾çÀº Á¾Á¾ »ç¶÷ÀÇ Â¡ÈÄ¿Í Áõ»óÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¹ß°ßµÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹½À´Ï´Ù. ½Äµµ¾ÏÀÌ ÀǽɵǴ °æ¿ì Áø´ÜÀ» È®Á¤Çϱâ À§ÇØ ÁøÂû, °Ë»ç, »ý°Ë(½Äµµ ¼¼Æ÷ äÃë)ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¾ÏÀÌ ¹ß°ßµÇ¸é ¾ÏÀÇ ¾Ç¼ºµµ¸¦ È®ÀÎÇϱâ À§ÇØ ´õ ¸¹Àº °Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ½Äµµ¾ÏÀ» È®ÀÎÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Ç¥ÁØ °Ë»ç´Â À§³»½Ã°æÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ø¹ß¼º ½Äµµ¾ÏÀº ÆíÆò»óÇǾϰú ¼±¾ÏÀÇ µÎ °¡Áö À¯ÇüÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷¾ÏÀº µå¹® ½Äµµ¾ÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷¾ÏÀº ½Äµµ¾ÏÀÇ µå¹® À¯ÇüÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿©·¯ À¯ÇüÀÇ ¾ÏÀº ½ÄµµÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ À¯ÇüÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷¿¡¼ ¹ß»ýÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌµé ¾ÏÀº °¢±â ´Ù¸¥ °æ°ú¸¦ º¸À̱⠶§¹®¿¡ °¢ °³Àο¡°Ô ¸Â´Â Ä¡·á¹ýÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
½Äµµ¾ÏÀº ºñ±³Àû µå¹® ¾ÏÀ̱⠶§¹®¿¡ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Á¤º¸¿Í ÁöħÀÌ ¸Å¿ì Á¦ÇÑÀûÀ̸ç, °æÇèÀ» °øÀ¯ÇÒ ±âȸµµ Àû½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¶§¹®¿¡ ÀÌ Áúº´¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνÄÀÌ ºÎÁ·ÇÑ ½ÇÁ¤ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¾ÏÀÌ ÁøÇàµÇ±â Àü±îÁö´Â Áõ»óÀÌ °æ¹ÌÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹¾Æ ´Ù¸¥ Áúº´À̳ª ¼Òȱâ Áúȯ°ú È¥µ¿Çϱ⠽±´Ù.
ÁÖ¿ä 7°³±¹ Áß ¹Ì±¹ÀÌ Àüü ½ÃÀåÀÇ 40%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏ¸ç °¡Àå Å« ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, EU 4°³±¹ ¹× ¿µ±¹ Áß ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ°¡ °¡Àå ÀÛÀº ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð·Î EU 4°³±¹ ¹× ¿µ±¹ Àüü ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ðÀÇ 8%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀϺ»ÀÇ ½Äµµ¾Ï ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â ¿¹Ãø ±â°£(2024-2034³â) µ¿¾È 0.6%ÀÇ ¿¬Æò±Õ º¹ÇÕ ¼ºÀå·ü(CAGR)·Î Áõ°¡ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â ÁÖ¿ä 7°³±¹ÀÇ ½Äµµ¾Ï ½ÃÀåÀ» Á¶»çÇßÀ¸¸ç, ½ÃÀå °³¿ä¿Í ÇÔ²² ¿ªÇÐ, ȯÀÚ µ¿Çâ, »õ·Î¿î Ä¡·á¹ý, 2034³â±îÁö ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð ¿¹Ãø, ¹ÌÃæÁ· ÀÇ·á ¼ö¿ä µîÀÇ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
Report Summary
Market
Various key players are leading the treatment landscape of Esophageal Cancer, such as Bayer, Hoffman-La Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eli lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Zymeworks, Innovent Biologics, Beigene, and others. The details of the country-wise and therapy-wise market size have been provided below.
The section dedicated to drugs in the Esophageal Cancer report provides an in-depth evaluation of late-stage pipeline drugs (Phase III and Phase II) related to Esophageal Cancer.
The drug chapters section provides valuable information on various aspects related to clinical trials of Esophageal Cancer, such as the pharmacological mechanisms of the drugs involved, designations, approval status, patent information, and a comprehensive analysis of the pros and cons associated with each drug. Furthermore, it presents the most recent news updates and press releases on drugs targeting Esophageal Cancer.
Marketed Therapies
CYRAMZA (ramucirumab): Eli Lilly and Company
CYRAMZA, as a single agent or in combination with paclitaxel, is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic, gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma with disease progression on or after prior fluoropyrimidine- or platinum-containing chemotherapy. The recommended dosage of CYRAMZA as a single agent or combined with weekly paclitaxel is 8 mg/kg every 2 weeks, administered by IV infusion over 60 min. Ramucirumab is a VEGFR2 antagonist that binds VEGFR2 explicitly and blocks the binding of VEGFR ligands, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D. As a result, ramucirumab inhibits ligand-stimulated activation of VEGFR2, thereby inhibiting ligand-induced proliferation and migration of human endothelial cells.
VITRAKVI (larotrectinib): Bayer
VITRAKVI (larotrectinib) is an oral TRK inhibitor for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with solid tumors with an NTRK gene fusion without a known acquired resistance mutation that is either metastatic or where surgical resection will likely result in severe morbidity and have no satisfactory alternative treatments or have progressed following treatment. It is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with solid tumors that have a neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) gene fusion without a known acquired resistance mutation, are metastatic or where surgical resection is likely to result in severe morbidity, and have no satisfactory alternative treatments or that have progressed following treatment.
Note: Detailed current therapies assessment will be provided in the full report of esophageal cancer.
Emerging Therapies
Zanidatamab: Zymeworks
Zanidatamab is given with chemotherapy plus or minus Tislelizumab as a combination therapy in HER2-Expressing Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancers, including Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma (GEA). Zanidatamab is given along with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (FP) with or without tislelizumab. This emerging asset has a novel mechanism of action. It uses biparatropic binding as it targets two HER2 epitopes. The drug has also received fast-track designation in combination with SoC chemotherapy for first-line Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma. As far as safety is concerned, no severe treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were observed. The most common Grade =3 TRAE was diarrhea which was manageable in the outpatient setting.
Sintilimab: Innovent Biologics
Sintilimab is an investigational PD-1 inhibitor developed by Innovent and Eli Lilly. The drug is currently in the Phase III stage of clinical development in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in subjects with unresectable, locally advanced recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. It is a first-line treatment option with cisplatin + paclitaxel or cisplatin + fluorouracil regimen for patients with unresectable, locally advanced recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, as per the clinical assessment of sintilimab, a 12-month overall survival of 64% was found as compared to the 88% overall survival rate of zanidatamab. The Objective Response Rate (ORR) was also slightly lesser than zanidatamab. The safety profile of Sinitilimab was not as good as zanidatamab. A decrease in neutrophil count, WBCs, and hypokalemia was observed.
The therapies used for esophageal cancer include chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Chemotherapy uses medications to eradicate cancer cells, often by preventing cancer cells from growing, dividing, and proliferating. Targeted therapy for esophageal cancer includes HER2-targeted therapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy.
A chemotherapy regimen, or schedule, typically consists of a predetermined number of cycles administered over a predetermined period. A patient may be administered one medicine at a time or a mixture of drugs simultaneously. As previously stated, chemotherapy and radiation therapy are frequently used concurrently to treat esophageal cancer, a procedure known as chemoradiotherapy. Immunotherapy uses the body's natural defenses to fight cancer by improving your immune system's ability to attack cancer cells.
Two types of immunotherapy drugs are approved to treat adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction. This cancer grows where the stomach and esophagus meet. Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA) and nivolumab (OPDIVO) are both checkpoint inhibitors that target the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.
As few potential therapies are being investigated to manage esophageal cancer, predicting that the treatment space will experience significant reconstitution during 2024-2034 is safe.
Further details are provided in the report.
Esophageal Cancer Disease Understanding and Treatment
Esophageal Cancer Overview
Esophageal cancer develops when cancer cells form in the esophagus, a tube-like tissue that connects the throat and stomach. The esophagus transports food from the mouth to the stomach. The cancer begins in the esophagus's inner layer and can spread to other layers of the esophagus and other organs of the body (metastasis).
Typically, symptoms of esophageal cancer do not appear until the tumor has grown large enough to impede eating, swallowing, or digesting food. The most common symptom of esophageal cancer is difficulty swallowing, particularly a sensation that food is lodged in the throat; in some individuals, choking on food occurs. These symptoms develop with time, with greater discomfort while swallowing as the esophagus narrows due to cancer growth.
Esophageal Cancer Diagnosis
Esophageal malignancies are often discovered by indications or symptoms. Exams, testing, and a biopsy (a sample of esophageal cells) will be required to confirm the diagnosis; if cancer is identified, more tests will help establish the extent (stage). When diagnosed late, esophageal cancer has a terrible prognosis; however, if diagnosed early, curative therapy is feasible. Before symptoms cause individuals to seek medical assistance, the condition slowly advances. Effective presymptomatic screening procedures may enhance disease outcomes. Recent research has shed light on the early detection of esophageal cancer using blood testing, sophisticated endoscopic imaging, and artificial intelligence.
Further details related to country-based variations are provided in the report.
Esophageal Cancer Treatment
Everyone who has esophageal cancer receives some form of therapy. Several factors, including personal preferences, cancer stage, and overall health, determine the appropriate course of therapy for each patient. Many medical professionals regularly collaborate in cancer care to construct a patient's comprehensive treatment plan, including various treatments.
Esophagectomy is the principal treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer, albeit its precise significance in superficial (T1A) cancers is still unclear, given the introduction of endoscopic mucosal therapy. A multimodal strategy for treating locally advanced cancers, comprising neoadjuvant chemotherapy or combination chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery, is strongly recommended.
The cornerstone of contemporary esophageal cancer management is preoperative assessment. Preoperative staging accuracy is critical since the tumor board's decisions on the use of multimodal therapy will be dependent on the precision and specifics of the clinical staging evaluation. Upper endoscopy, high-resolution contrast CT scan, FDG-PET scan, and EUS are all part of the standardized evaluation of a patient undergoing curative treatment for early-stage or advanced esophageal cancer.
Doctors typically recommend combining radiation treatment, chemotherapy, and surgery for a tumor that has not spread beyond the esophagus and lymph nodes. Locally advanced esophageal cancer is usually treated with radiation treatment, chemotherapy, and surgery. Radiation treatment and chemotherapy are often combined in "chemoradiotherapy." Radiation treatment, chemotherapy, and other drug-based therapies are commonly used to treat metastatic esophageal cancer.
Further details related to treatment and management are provided in the report.
The Esophageal Cancer epidemiology chapter in the report provides historical as well as forecasted epidemiology segmented by total diagnosed incident cases, age-specific cases, histology-specific cases, gender-specific cases, mutation-specific cases, stage-specific cases and line wise treated cases of esophageal cancer in the United States, EU4 countries (Germany, France, Italy, Spain) and the United Kingdom, and Japan from 2020 to 2034.
KOL Views
To stay abreast of the latest trends in the market, we conduct primary research by seeking the opinions of Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) and Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) who work in the relevant field. This helps us fill any gaps in data and validate our secondary research.
We have reached out to industry experts to gather insights on various aspects of Esophageal Cancer, including the evolving treatment landscape, patients' reliance on conventional therapies, their acceptance of therapy switching, drug uptake, and challenges related to accessibility. The experts we contacted included medical/scientific writers, professors, and researchers from prestigious universities in the US, Europe, the UK, and Japan.
Our team of analysts at Delveinsight connected with more than 15 KOLs across the 7MM. We contacted institutions such as the Atrium Health's Levine Cancer Institute, National Cancer Center Hospital, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, etc., among others. By obtaining the opinions of these experts, we gained a better understanding of the current and emerging treatment patterns in the Esophageal Cancer market, which will assist our clients in analyzing the overall epidemiology and market scenario.
Qualitative Analysis
We perform Qualitative and Market Intelligence analysis using various approaches, such as SWOT analysis and Conjoint Analysis. In the SWOT analysis, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in terms of disease diagnosis, patient awareness, patient burden, competitive landscape, cost-effectiveness, and geographical accessibility of therapies are provided. These pointers are based on the Analyst's discretion and assessment of the patient burden, cost analysis, and existing and evolving treatment landscape.
Conjoint Analysis analyzes multiple approved and emerging therapies based on relevant attributes such as safety, efficacy, frequency of administration, designation, route of administration, and order of entry. Scoring is given based on these parameters to analyze the effectiveness of therapy.
In efficacy, the trial's primary and secondary outcome measures are evaluated; for instance, in trials for Esophageal Cancer, important primary endpoints are overall survival rate, event-free survival, progression free survival, etc. Based on these parameters, the overall efficacy is evaluated.
Further, the therapies' safety is evaluated wherein the acceptability, tolerability, and adverse events are majorly observed, and it sets a clear understanding of the side effects posed by the drug in the trials. In addition, the scoring is also based on the route of administration, order of entry and designation, probability of success, and the addressable patient pool for each therapy. According to these parameters, a final weightage score is decided, based on which the emerging therapies are ranked.
Market Access and Reimbursement
Because newly authorized drugs are often expensive, some patients escape receiving proper treatment or use off-label, less expensive prescriptions. Reimbursement plays a critical role in how innovative treatments can enter the market. The cost of the medicine, compared to the benefit it provides to patients who are being treated, sometimes determines whether or not it will be reimbursed. Regulatory status, target population size, the setting of treatment, unmet needs, the number of incremental benefit claims, and prices can all affect market access and reimbursement possibilities.
The report further provides detailed insights on the country-wise accessibility and reimbursement scenarios, cost-effectiveness scenario of approved therapies, programs making accessibility easier and out-of-pocket costs more affordable, insights on patients insured under federal or state government prescription drug programs, etc.