토양 안정화 시장(2023-2030년)

Overview

Global Soil Stabilization Market reached US$ 20.89 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 31.3 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 5.2% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

Increasing focus on sustainability and environmentally friendly construction practices is driving the adoption of soil stabilization techniques. These methods help minimize environmental impact, reduce soil erosion, and promote efficient land use, aligning with global efforts to achieve more sustainable infrastructure development.

Investments in infrastructure projects, such as roads, highways, airports, and ports, in both developed and developing economies drive the demand for soil stabilization solutions. These projects often require strong and stable foundations, making soil stabilization an essential component. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), over 90% of all construction projects in the United States involve soil stabilization, and USGS (US Geological Survey) projected that soil stabilization techniques could lessen construction costs by up to 20%.

Ongoing research and development efforts are leading to the development of advanced soil stabilization materials and additives. Innovations in geosynthetics, biopolymers, and other specialized additives are enhancing the effectiveness of stabilization techniques and expanding their applications. As per the research done by Mohadeseh Cheraghalikhani, Hamed Niroumand & Lech Balachowski, micro- and nano-size bentonite as soil stabilizers are used to improve the strength of clayey sand.

Dynamics

Increasing Awareness About the Benefits of Soil Stabilization

Soil stabilization techniques help prevent soil erosion, which is essential for preserving the good health of ecosystems, agricultural fields, and construction sites. According to Global Agriculture, every year an expected 24 billion tons of fertile soil are lost due to erosion. FAO claims that soil erosion in agriculture reduces agricultural production by 50%. Soil stabilization can enhance the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the soil, resulting in better water retention, nutrient availability, and overall soil health. This further leads to improved plant growth and increased crop yields.

Soil stabilization techniques help prevent soil erosion making the soil less susceptible to being carried away by wind or water. This is crucial in maintaining the integrity of agricultural fields, preventing loss of topsoil, and ensuring sustainable land use. Stabilized soils are more r resistant to adverse weather conditions like drought or heavy rain. This adaptability can assist farmers in reducing the impact of climate change on their crops and agricultural output.

Infrastructure Development

Infrastructure projects, such as roads, highways, bridges, airports, ports, and railways, require stable and strong foundations to ensure their long-term durability and functionality. Soil stabilization techniques play a crucial role in preparing construction sites and addressing soil-related challenges that can arise during these projects. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), over 90% of all construction projects in the United States involve soil stabilization, and USGS (US Geological Survey) projected that soil stabilization techniques could lessen construction costs by up to 20%, depending on the type of project and other factors.

Infrastructure projects often involve the construction of heavy and complex structures. Proper soil stabilization ensures that the foundation can support the weight and load-bearing requirements of these structures, preventing settlement, uneven subsidence, and structural failure.

High Cost of Soil Stabilization Additives and Techniques

The implementation of soil stabilization techniques can involve significant upfront costs, including expenses related to equipment, materials, and skilled labor. For instance, according to the International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), for 10 m3 volume of soil to be stabilized, average cost of cement stabilization is Rs 10,912. These costs can deter some construction projects or land development initiatives from adopting soil stabilization methods, especially in cases where budget constraints are a concern.

Farmers might not fully understand the benefits of soil stabilization or the potential return on investment. High upfront costs can discourage them from exploring or adopting these practices, especially if they are unaware of the long-term advantages.

Segment Analysis

The global soil stabilization market is segmented based on method, additives, distribution channel, application and region.

Efficient Result Achieved by Mechanical Method

The mechanical method involves physically altering the soil's structure and properties to achieve stabilization. In February 2023, Bobcat introduced a new light compaction product range. These Light compactors increase soil strength and improve stability and load-bearing capacity by removing voids and interlocking soil particles. Mechanical methods often provide relatively rapid results in terms of soil loosening and compaction reduction. Farmers and land managers can see immediate improvements in soil structure and tilth after using mechanical equipment.

Some mechanical methods, such as reduced tillage or no-till practices, are also associated with improved soil conservation and reduced erosion. These practices align with sustainable farming principles and may receive support from agricultural policies and programs.

Source: DataM Intelligence Analysis (2023)

Geographical Penetration

Asia-Pacific's Growing Soil Erosion

Many areas in Asia-Pacific are experiencing significant soil erosion problems which leads to crop loss in that region. For instance, the annual loss in output of main crops in India because of soil erosion has been estimated to be 7.2 million tonnes which is about 4 to 6.3 percent of the annual agricultural production of the country. Soil stabilization is crucial for preventing erosion and maintaining soil health enhancing crop productivity in that region.

In June 2022, InnoCSR, a South Korean material technology company and member of the Born2Global Centre, introduced Good Road System (GRS), its soil-stabilized road technology, in Nepal. The technology follows the success of the Good Bricks System, where InnoCSR's soil stabilizers are used to make non-fired bricks. This type of development in the Asia-Pacific region also leads to soil stabilization market growth in that region.

Source: DataM Intelligence Analysis (2023)

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include Caterpillar, AB Volvo, FAYAT GROUP, WIRTGEN GROUP, CARMEUSE, Global Road Technology International Holdings, SNF, Aggrebind, Inc., Iridan and Tensar

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

COVID Impact

The pandemic led to disruptions in global supply chains, affecting the availability of materials and equipment needed for soil stabilization projects. This might have resulted in delays or increased costs for agricultural operations.

Lockdowns, travel restrictions, and social distancing measures impacted labor availability and mobility. This could have affected the implementation of soil stabilization techniques that require manual labor or specialized expertise.

By Method

• Mechanical Method
• Chemical Method

By Additives

• Polymer
  • Synthetic Polymers
  • Biopolymers
• Mineral & Stabilizing Agents
  • Portland Cement
  • Lime
  • Fly Ash
  • Others
• Other Additives
  • Agricultural waste
  • Sludge
  • Chelates & Salts

By Distribution Channel

• Company-Owned Shops
• Specialty Stores
• E-Commerce
• Others

By Application

• Industrial
  • Roads
  • Landfills/Contaminated Land
  • Others
• Agriculture
  • Open-Field Application
  • Greenhouse
• Non-Agriculture
  • Golf Courses/Sports Grounds
  • Residential
  • Others

By Region

• North America
  • U.S.
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • UK
  • France
  • Italy
  • Russia
  • Rest of Europe
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Rest of South America
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • Rest of Asia-Pacific
• Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

• In April 2022, Researchers at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Mandi developed sustainable techniques for soil stabilization using a harmless bacteria called S. Pasteurii.
• In August 2020, Corteva introduced the Instinct NEXTGEN nitrogen stabilizer. The Optinyte technology in Instinct NXTGEN nitrogen stabilizer promotes 28% greater soil nitrogen retention.
• In June 2021, Lafarge Western Canada Introduced EcoPlanet Ultra Low Carbon Cement. EcoPlanet is suitable for mining and soil stabilization.

Why Purchase the Report?

• To visualize the global soil stabilization market segmentation based on method, additives, distribution channel, application and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
• Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
• Excel data sheet with numerous data points of soil stabilization market-level with all segments.
• PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
• Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global soil stabilization market report would provide approximately 69 tables, 67 figures and 247 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

• Manufacturers/ Buyers
• Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
• Research Professionals
• Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1.Methodology and Scope

• 1.1.Research Methodology
• 1.2.Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2.Definition and Overview

3.Executive Summary

• 3.1.Snippet by Method
• 3.2.Snippet by Additives
• 3.3.Snippet by Distribution Channel
• 3.4.Snippet by Application
• 3.5.Snippet by Region

4.Dynamics

• 4.1.Impacting Factors
  • 4.1.1.Drivers
    • 4.1.1.1.Increasing Awareness About the Benefits of Soil Stabilization
    • 4.1.1.2.Infrastructure Development
  • 4.1.2.Restraints
    • 4.1.2.1.High Cost of Soil Stabilization Additives and Techniques
  • 4.1.3.Opportunity
  • 4.1.4.Impact Analysis

5.Industry Analysis

• 5.1.Porter's Five Force Analysis
• 5.2.Supply Chain Analysis
• 5.3.Pricing Analysis
• 5.4.Regulatory Analysis

6.COVID-19 Analysis

• 6.1.Analysis of COVID-19
  • 6.1.1.Scenario Before COVID
  • 6.1.2.Scenario During COVID
  • 6.1.3.Scenario Post COVID
• 6.2.Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
• 6.3.Demand-Supply Spectrum
• 6.4.Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
• 6.5.Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
• 6.6.Conclusion

7.By Method

• 7.1.Introduction
  • 7.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
  • 7.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Method
• 7.2.Mechanical Method*
  • 7.2.1.Introduction
  • 7.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 7.3.Chemical Method

8.By Additive

• 8.1.Introduction
  • 8.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additive
  • 8.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Additive
• 8.2.Polymer*
  • 8.2.1.Introduction
  • 8.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.2.3.Synthetic Polymers
  • 8.2.4.Biopolymers
• 8.3.Mineral & Stabilizing Agents
  • 8.3.1.Portland Cement
  • 8.3.2.Lime
  • 8.3.3.Fly Ash
  • 8.3.4.Others
• 8.4.Other Additives
  • 8.4.1.Agricultural waste
  • 8.4.2.Sludge
  • 8.4.3.Chelates & Salts

9.By Distribution Channel

• 9.1.Introduction
  • 9.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
  • 9.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Distribution Channel
• 9.2.Company-Owned Shops*
  • 9.2.1.Introduction
  • 9.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 9.3.Specialty Stores
• 9.4.E-Commerce
• 9.5.Others

10.By Application

• 10.1.Introduction
  • 10.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
  • 10.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
• 10.2.Industrial*
  • 10.2.1.Introduction
  • 10.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.2.3.Roads
  • 10.2.4.Landfills/Contaminated Land
  • 10.2.5.Others
• 10.3.Agriculture
  • 10.3.1.Open-Field Application
  • 10.3.2.Greenhouse
  • 10.3.3.Non-Agriculture
  • 10.3.4.Golf Courses/Sports Grounds
  • 10.3.5.Residential
  • 10.3.6.Others

11.By Region

• 11.1.Introduction
  • 11.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
  • 11.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
• 11.2.North America
  • 11.2.1.Introduction
  • 11.2.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 11.2.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
  • 11.2.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
  • 11.2.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
  • 11.2.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
  • 11.2.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 11.2.7.1.U.S.
    • 11.2.7.2.Canada
    • 11.2.7.3.Mexico
• 11.3.Europe
  • 11.3.1.Introduction
  • 11.3.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 11.3.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
  • 11.3.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
  • 11.3.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
  • 11.3.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
  • 11.3.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 11.3.7.1.Germany
    • 11.3.7.2.UK
    • 11.3.7.3.France
    • 11.3.7.4.Italy
    • 11.3.7.5.Russia
    • 11.3.7.6.Rest of Europe
• 11.4.South America
  • 11.4.1.Introduction
  • 11.4.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 11.4.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
  • 11.4.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
  • 11.4.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
  • 11.4.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
  • 11.4.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 11.4.7.1.Brazil
    • 11.4.7.2.Argentina
    • 11.4.7.3.Rest of South America
• 11.5.Asia-Pacific
  • 11.5.1.Introduction
  • 11.5.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 11.5.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
  • 11.5.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
  • 11.5.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
  • 11.5.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
  • 11.5.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 11.5.7.1.China
    • 11.5.7.2.India
    • 11.5.7.3.Japan
    • 11.5.7.4.Australia
    • 11.5.7.5.Rest of Asia-Pacific
• 11.6.Middle East and Africa
  • 11.6.1.Introduction
  • 11.6.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 11.6.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
  • 11.6.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
  • 11.6.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
  • 11.6.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

12.Competitive Landscape

• 12.1.Competitive Scenario
• 12.2.Market Positioning/Share Analysis
• 12.3.Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13.Company Profiles

• 13.1.Caterpillar*
  • 13.1.1.Company Overview
  • 13.1.2.Product Portfolio and Description
  • 13.1.3.Financial Overview
  • 13.1.4.Recent Developments
• 13.2.AB Volvo
• 13.3.FAYAT GROUP
• 13.4.WIRTGEN GROUP
• 13.5.CARMEUSE
• 13.6.Global Road Technology International Holdings (HK) Limited
• 13.7.SNF
• 13.8.Aggrebind, Inc.
• 13.9.Iridan
• 13.10.Tensar LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14.Appendix

• 14.1.About Us and Services
• 14.2.Contact Us