![]() |
½ÃÀ庸°í¼
»óǰÄÚµå
1572019
¼¼°èÀÇ Ã´Ãß¼ºÇü¼ú ½ÃÀåVertebroplasty |
ôÃß¼ºÇü¼ú ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 2030³â±îÁö 4¾ï 2,670¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î Àü¸Á
2023³â 2¾ï 8,750¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ´Â ôÃß¼ºÇü¼ú ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â 4¾ï 2,670¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÇ¸ç, ºÐ¼® ±â°£ÀÎ 2023-2030³â µ¿¾È ¿¬Æò±Õ 5.8% ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.
¹Ì±¹ ½ÃÀå 7,630¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤, Áß±¹Àº CAGR 8.5%·Î ¼ºÀå Àü¸Á
¹Ì±¹ÀÇ Ã´Ãß¼ºÇü¼ú ½ÃÀåÀº 2023³â 7,630¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è 2À§ÀÇ °æÁ¦ ´ë±¹ÀÎ Áß±¹Àº 2023-2030³â ºÐ¼® ±â°£ µ¿¾È 8.5%ÀÇ CAGR·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 9,530¸¸ ´Þ·¯ÀÇ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù. ´Ù¸¥ ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Áö¿ª ½ÃÀåÀ¸·Î´Â ÀϺ»°ú ij³ª´Ù°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ºÐ¼® ±â°£ µ¿¾È °¢°¢ 3.3%¿Í 5.5%ÀÇ CAGRÀ» ±â·ÏÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. À¯·´¿¡¼´Â µ¶ÀÏÀÌ ¿¬Æò±Õ 3.4%ÀÇ ¼ºÀå·üÀ» º¸ÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.
¼¼°è ôÃß¼ºÇü¼ú ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ ¹× ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ Á¤¸®
ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀ̶õ ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº ÁÖ·Î °ñ´Ù°øÁõ, ÀüÀ̼º ¾Ï, ¿Ü»óÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ °íÅ뽺·¯¿î ôÃ߾йڰñÀý(VCF)À» Ä¡·áÇϱâ À§ÇØ °³¹ßµÈ ÃÖ÷´Ü ÃÖ¼Òħ½À ¼ö¼ú¹ýÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¼ö¼úÀº Ư¼ö ¾ÆÅ©¸± °ñ ½Ã¸àÆ®(°¡Àå ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ °ÍÀº Æú¸®¸ÞÆ¿¸ÞŸũ¸±·¹ÀÌÆ®(PMMA)¸¦ °ñÀýµÈ ôÃß»À¿¡ Á÷Á¢ ÁÖÀÔÇÏ¿© ôÃ߸¦ ¾ÈÁ¤½Ã۰í ÅëÁõÀ» ºü¸£°Ô ¿ÏȽÃŵ´Ï´Ù. ôÃß¼ºÇü¼ú µ¿¾È ¿Ü°ú ÀÇ»ç´Â ½Ã¸àÆ®¸¦ Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ÁÖÀÔÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¿¬¼ÓÀûÀÎ ½Ç½Ã°£ Åõ½Ã ¶Ç´Â CT ¿µ»ó ¾È³»ÇÏ¿¡ ÇǺθ¦ ÅëÇØ °ñÀýµÈ »À¿¡ ¹Ì¼¼ÇÑ ¹Ù´ÃÀ» Á¶½É½º·´°Ô »ðÀÔÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ½Ã¸àÆ®´Â ¹Ý ¾×ü »óÅ·ΠÁÖÀԵǾî ôÃß ³»¿¡¼ ºü¸£°Ô ±»¾î ±¸Á¶Àû ¹«°á¼ºÀ» È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î º¹¿øÇϰí ÅëÁõÀÇ ¿øÀÎÀÌ µÇ´Â ¹Ì¼¼ÇÑ ¿òÁ÷ÀÓÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀÌ Æ¯È÷ ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÎ ÀÌÀ¯´Â ÅëÁõÀ» Áï°¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ÏÈÇϰí Áö¼Ó½Ãų ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ Áï½Ã Á¤»óÀûÀΠȰµ¿À» Àç°³ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ÈÞ½Ä, ÅëÁõ °ü¸®, º¸Á¶±â Âø¿ë°ú °°Àº º¸Á¸Àû Ä¡·á¿¡ ¹ÝÀÀÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô ±ÇÀåµÇ¸ç, ôÃß °ñÀý ȯÀÚÀÇ »îÀÇ ÁúÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃŰ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ¼±ÅÃÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÀÌ ¼ö¼úÀº ¾ÈÀü¼º ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏÀÌ È®¸³µÇ¾î ÀÖ°í, ÃÖ±Ù ¿µ»ó Áø´Ü ±â¼ú, ½Ã¸àÆ® ±¸¼º ¹× ½Ã¼ú ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î °ü·Ã À§ÇèÀÌ Å©°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿© Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú ¹× ½Å°æ¿Ü°ú ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼ ³Î¸® ÀÎÁ¤¹Þ´Â Ä¡·á ¿É¼ÇÀ¸·Î ÀÚ¸® Àâ¾Ò½À´Ï´Ù.
ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ÀåÁ¡°ú °úÁ¦´Â ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀÇ ÀåÁ¡Àº ¿©·¯ Ãø¸é¿¡¼ ôÃß ¾Ð¹Ú °ñÀý ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô Å« ÀÓ»óÀû ÀÌÁ¡À» °¡Á®´Ù ÁÖÁö¸¸, ¹®Á¦°¡ ¾ø´Â °ÍÀº ¾Æ´Õ´Ï´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä ÀåÁ¡ Áß Çϳª´Â ÅëÁõÀÌ ½Å¼ÓÇϰí Å©°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÑ´Ù´Â Á¡Àε¥, ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ °æ¿ì ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¸î ½Ã°£ À̳»¿¡ ÅëÁõÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ȯÀÚ´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ °³º¹ ¼ö¼ú Ä¡·áº¸´Ù ÈξÀ ´õ »¡¸® À̵¿¼ºÀ» ȸº¹Çϰí ÀÏ»ó »ýȰ·Î µ¹¾Æ°¥ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ºü¸¥ ȸº¹Àº ƯÈ÷ ½ÅüÀû ´É·ÂÀÌ Á¦ÇѵǾî Àְųª ¿©·¯ ÇÕº´ÁõÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Ä¡·á°¡ º¹ÀâÇÑ °í·ÉÀÇ È¯Àڵ鿡°Ô ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, °ñÀýµÈ ôÃ߸¦ ¾ÈÁ¤È½ÃÅ´À¸·Î½á ôôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº ôÃßÀÇ Ãß°¡Àû ºØ±«¿Í º¯ÇüÀ» ¹æÁöÇϰí, ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î "Ȥ»ì"·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁø Èĸ¸ÁõÀÇ ÁøÇà À§ÇèÀ» °¨¼Ò½Ãŵ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀåÁ¡¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸Çϰí ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº ÀÇÇа迡¼ Å« ³í¶õÀ» ºÒ·¯ÀÏÀ¸Å°°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× ÁÖ¿ä ¿øÀÎÀº ÁÖÀÔµÈ ¹°ÁúÀÌ Ã´Ãß¿¡¼ ÀÎÁ¢ÇÑ ±¸Á¶¹°·Î ´©ÃâµÇ¾î ½Å°æ±Ù ¾Ð¹Ú, »öÀüÁõ, ô¼ö ¼Õ»óÀ» À¯¹ßÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÕº´Áõ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ì·Á ¶§¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ À§ÇèÀ» ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇØ Á¡µµ°¡ ³ôÀº ½Ã¸àÆ®¸¦ »ç¿ëÇϰųª ½Ã¼ú Áß Á¦¾î°¡ ¿ëÀÌÇϵµ·Ï ÁÖÀÔ ±â¼úÀ» °³¼±ÇÏ´Â µî ½Ã¸àÆ® Á¦Á¦ÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ ÁøÇàµÇ¾î ¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù. ¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ Áß¿äÇÑ °úÁ¦´Â °ñÀýÀÇ ±Ùº»ÀûÀÎ ¿øÀο¡ µû¶ó È¿°ú°¡ ´Ù¸£±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ÀûÀýÇÑ Ã´Ãß¼ºÇü¼úÀÇ °úÁ¦¸¦ ¼±ÅÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº °ñ´Ù°øÁõ¼º °ñÀýÀÇ Ä¡·á¿¡¼ ¿ì¼öÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö¸¸, ¾Ç¼º º´º¯À̳ª Ãæ°ÝÀÌ ½ÉÇÑ ¿Ü»óÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ °ñÀý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À¯È¿¼ºÀº ¾ÆÁ÷ ¿¬±¸ ÁßÀ¸·Î, ȯÀÚÀÇ Á¤È®ÇÑ Æò°¡¿Í °³º°ÈµÈ Ä¡·á °èȹÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ °Á¶µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ôÃß¼ºÇü¼ú°ú ´Ù¸¥ Ä¡·á¹ý°úÀÇ ºñ±³´Â?
ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº µ¶Æ¯ÇÑ ÀåÁ¡À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ƯÁ¤ À¯ÇüÀÇ Ã´Ãß ¾Ð¹Ú °ñÀý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼±È£µÇ´Â Ä¡·á¹ýÀ¸·Î µÎµå·¯ÁöÁö¸¸, Á¾Á¾ Ä«ÀÌÆ÷ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½À̳ª ôÃß °íÁ¤¼ú°ú °°Àº ´Ù¸¥ Ä¡·á¹ý°ú ºñ±³µÇÁö¸¸, °¢°¢ ÀåÁ¡°ú ÇѰ谡 ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °ü·Ã ¼ö¼úÀÎ Ä«ÀÌÆ÷ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½Àº ½Ã¸àÆ®¸¦ ÁÖÀÔÇϱâ Àü¿¡ dz¼± ÅÆÇÎÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ôÃß¿¡ °øµ¿À» ¸¸µé¾î ÀÒ¾î¹ö¸° ôÃßÀÇ ³ôÀ̸¦ ¾î´À Á¤µµ ȸº¹Çϰí ôÃßÀÇ º¯ÇüÀ» ±³Á¤ÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µË´Ï´Ù. °ñ´Ü ¼ºÇü¼úÀº ôÃßÀÇ ¸¸°îÀ» ¾ïÁ¦Çϰí ÀÚ¼¼ ÀÌ»óÀ» ¿¹¹æÇÏ´Â µ¥ ´õ È¿°úÀûÀÌÁö¸¸ ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úº¸´Ù ºñ¿ë°ú ½Ã°£ÀÌ ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ µì´Ï´Ù. ¹Ý¸é ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº ½Ã¸àÆ®¸¦ Á÷Á¢ ÁÖÀÔÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ´õ °£´ÜÇÏ°í ºü¸£¸ç Àú·ÅÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ôÃß °íÁ¤¼úÀº ´õ ħ½ÀÀûÀÎ ¼ö¼ú ¹æ¹ýÀ̸ç, ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ¿©·¯ °³ÀÇ Ã´Ãß»À°¡ Àְųª ôÃß°¡ ½É°¢ÇÏ°Ô ºÒ¾ÈÁ¤ÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡¸¸ ½ÃÇàµË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¼ö¼úÀº µÎ °³ ÀÌ»óÀÇ Ã´Ãß»À¸¦ ¿µ±¸ÀûÀ¸·Î °áÇÕÇϱâ À§ÇØ »À À̽İú ±Ý¼Ó ±Ý¼Ó ÀåÄ¡¸¦ »ç¿ëÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ º¹À⼺, ȸº¹ ½Ã°£ ¹× ÇÕº´Áõ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ³ô½À´Ï´Ù. ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº ±¹¼Ò ¸¶Ãë·Î ½ÃÇàµÇ´Â ÃÖ¼Òħ½ÀÀû ¼ö¼ú·Î, ´ëºÎºÐ ¿Ü·¡È¯ÀÚ·Î ½ÃÇàµÇ±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ħ½ÀÀûÀÎ ¼ö¼ú¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ Àå½Ã°£ÀÇ ¸¶Ãë¿Í ÀÔ¿øÀ» °ßµô ¼ö ¾ø´Â ³ë¾àÀÚ³ª ÀÇ·áÀûÀ¸·Î Ãë¾àÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¿¡°Ô ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ ¼±ÅÃÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀÇ ÅëÁõ ¿ÏÈ ¹× °ñÀý ¾ÈÁ¤È ¼º°ø·üÀº ħ½ÀÀû ¼ö¼ú°ú ºñ½ÁÇϰųª ±× ÀÌ»óÀ̱⠶§¹®¿¡ ƯÈ÷ ºü¸¥ ÅëÁõ ¿ÏÈ¿Í Á¤»ó ±â´É ȸº¹ÀÌ ÁÖ¿ä Ä¡·á ¸ñÇ¥ÀÎ °æ¿ì ¸Å¿ì À¯¸®ÇÑ ¼±ÅÃÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿É¼ÇÀÇ ¼±ÅÃÀº ôÃßÀÇ ºØ±« Á¤µµ, Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ »ÀÀÇ °Ç° »óÅÂ, °¢ Ä¡·á¹ýÀÇ À§Çè°ú ÀÌÁ¡À» ÃæºÐÈ÷ ³íÀÇÇÑ ÈÄ È¯ÀÚ °³ÀÎÀÇ ¼±È£µµ µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿äÀο¡ µû¶ó ´Þ¶óÁú ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀº ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
ôÃß¼ºÇü¼ú ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀº °ñ´Ù°øÁõ ¹× °ü·Ã ôÃß °ñÀýÀÇ À¯º´·ü Áõ°¡, ½Ã¼ú ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀü, ´ú ħ½ÀÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á ¿É¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ È¯ÀÚ ¼±È£µµ º¯È µî ¿©·¯ °¡Áö ¿äÀο¡ ±âÀÎÇÕ´Ï´Ù. °ñ´Ù°øÁõÀº °í·ÉÀÚ, ƯÈ÷ Æó°æ±â ÀÌÈÄ ¿©¼º¿¡°Ô ƯÈ÷ ÈçÇϸç, À̴ ôÃß ¾Ð¹Ú °ñÀý Ä¡·á¸¦ ÇÊ¿ä·Î Çϴ ȯÀÚ ¼ö°¡ ±ÞÁõÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î À̾îÁö±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Àü ¼¼°è °í·Éȴ ôÃß¼ºÇü¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä¸¦ °ßÀÎÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ¿äÀÎÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, »ýü Ȱ¼º ½Ã¸àÆ®, ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ°ú¼º ½Ã¸àÆ®¿Í °°Àº Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ½Ã¸àÆ® Á¦Á¦ÀÇ µµÀÔÀ¸·Î ½Ã¼úÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼º°ú Ä¡·á °á°ú°¡ °³¼±µÇ¸é¼ ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº ȯÀÚ¿Í ÀÇ·áÁø ¸ðµÎ¿¡°Ô ´õ¿í ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÎ ¼±ÅÃÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, °íÈÁú Åõ½Ã ¹× ½Ç½Ã°£ 3D ¿µ»ó µî ¿µ»ó Áø´Ü ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ½Ã¼úÀÇ Á¤È®µµ°¡ Çâ»óµÇ¾î ÇÕº´Áõ°ú ½Ã¸àÆ® ´©ÃâÀÇ À§ÇèÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿Ü·¡ ¹× ¿Ü·¡ ¼ö¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼±È£µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁø °Íµµ ½ÃÀå È®´ë¿¡ ±â¿©Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀº Àå±â ÀÔ¿ø ¾øÀ̵µ ½ÃÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹¾Æ Àüü ÀÇ·á ºñ¿ëÀ» Àý°¨Çϰí ȯÀÚ ¸¸Á·µµ¸¦ ³ôÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼ÒºñÀÚ Çൿ µ¿ÇâÀº ºü¸¥ ȸº¹°ú ÀÏ»ó »ýȰ¿¡ ÁöÀåÀ» ÁÖÁö ¾Ê´Â Ä¡·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¸é¼ Ã´Ãß¼ºÇü¼úÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ´õ¿í ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ôÃß °ñÀý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¶±â °³ÀÔÀÇ ÀÌÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇ·á Àü¹®°¡¿Í ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀνÄÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó º¸´Ù Àû±ØÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á Àü·«À¸·Î À̾îÁ® ÀáÀçÀû ȯÀÚÃþÀÌ È®´ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, »õ·Î¿î ½ÃÀå ±â¾÷ÀÇ ÁøÀÔ°ú ÁÖ¿ä ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ °£ÀÇ Àü·«Àû ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀº °æÀïÀ» Ȱ¼ºÈÇϰí Çõ½ÅÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ¿© ôÃß¼ºÇü¼úÀÇ Á¢±Ù¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÌ°í ºñ¿ëÀ» ³·Ãâ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ôÃß¼ºÇü¼ú ½ÃÀåÀº Àα¸ µ¿Çâ, ±â¼ú Çõ½Å, ȯÀÚ ¹× ÀÇ·á ¼ºñ½º Á¦°øÀÚÀÇ ¼±È£µµ º¯È¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î ÇâÈÄ ¸î ³â µ¿¾È °·ÂÇÑ ¼ºÀå¼¼¸¦ º¸ÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.
Global Vertebroplasty Market to Reach US$426.7 Million by 2030
The global market for Vertebroplasty estimated at US$287.5 Million in the year 2023, is expected to reach US$426.7 Million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 5.8% over the analysis period 2023-2030.
The U.S. Market is Estimated at US$76.3 Million While China is Forecast to Grow at 8.5% CAGR
The Vertebroplasty market in the U.S. is estimated at US$76.3 Million in the year 2023. China, the world's second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$95.3 Million by the year 2030 trailing a CAGR of 8.5% over the analysis period 2023-2030. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at a CAGR of 3.3% and 5.5% respectively over the analysis period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 3.4% CAGR.
Global Vertebroplasty Market - Key Trends and Drivers Summarized
What Is Vertebroplasty and How Does It Work?
Vertebroplasty is a cutting-edge, minimally invasive surgical procedure developed to treat painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) caused primarily by osteoporosis, metastatic cancers, or trauma. This procedure entails injecting a specialized acrylic bone cement, most commonly polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), directly into the fractured vertebra to stabilize it and provide rapid pain relief. During vertebroplasty, the surgeon carefully inserts a thin needle through the skin into the fractured bone under continuous real-time fluoroscopic or CT imaging guidance to ensure precise placement of the cement. The cement is injected in a semi-liquid state and quickly hardens inside the vertebra, effectively restoring its structural integrity and reducing micromovements that are the source of pain. What makes vertebroplasty especially appealing is its ability to provide immediate and lasting pain relief, allowing patients to resume normal activities shortly after the procedure. It is typically recommended for patients who have not responded to conservative management, such as bed rest, pain medication, and bracing, making it a critical option for improving the quality of life in individuals with debilitating spinal fractures. Additionally, vertebroplasty has a well-established safety profile, and recent advancements in imaging techniques, cement composition, and procedural methodologies have significantly reduced the associated risks, making it a widely accepted therapeutic option in the orthopedic and neurosurgical communities.
What Are the Major Benefits and Challenges of Vertebroplasty?
The advantages of vertebroplasty are multifaceted, providing substantial clinical benefits to patients with vertebral compression fractures, yet the procedure is not without its challenges. One of its primary benefits is the rapid and significant reduction of pain, which often occurs within hours post-procedure, enabling patients to regain mobility and return to their daily routines much faster than traditional open surgical treatments. This accelerated recovery is particularly crucial for elderly patients with limited physical capacity and those who suffer from multiple comorbidities that complicate their treatment. Furthermore, by stabilizing the fractured vertebra, vertebroplasty prevents further collapse and deformation of the spine, reducing the risk of progressive kyphosis, commonly known as a "dowager’s hump." Despite these benefits, vertebroplasty has sparked considerable debate in the medical community, primarily due to concerns regarding cement leakage—a complication that occurs when the injected material extrudes from the vertebral body into adjacent structures, potentially causing nerve root compression, embolism, or spinal cord injury. To mitigate these risks, there have been advancements in cement formulations, including the use of higher viscosity cements and refined injection techniques that allow for better control during the procedure. Another significant challenge lies in the selection of appropriate candidates for vertebroplasty, as its efficacy varies depending on the underlying cause of the fracture. While it has shown excellent outcomes in treating osteoporotic fractures, its effectiveness in fractures caused by malignant lesions or high-impact trauma remains a subject of ongoing research, highlighting the need for precise patient evaluation and individualized treatment planning.
How Does Vertebroplasty Compare to Other Treatment Options?
Vertebroplasty stands out as a preferred treatment for certain types of vertebral compression fractures due to its unique benefits, but it is often compared to other procedures like kyphoplasty and spinal fusion, each of which has its own strengths and limitations. Kyphoplasty, a related procedure, involves the use of a balloon tamp to create a cavity within the vertebra before cement is injected, which helps to restore some of the lost vertebral height and correct spinal deformity. While kyphoplasty is more effective in reducing spinal curvature and preventing postural abnormalities, it is typically more expensive and time-consuming than vertebroplasty. Vertebroplasty, by contrast, involves direct cement injection, making it simpler, faster, and less costly. Spinal fusion, a more invasive surgical option, is usually reserved for severe cases involving multiple vertebrae or when there is significant spinal instability. This procedure involves placing bone grafts and metallic hardware to permanently join two or more vertebrae, which increases the complexity, recovery time, and the potential for complications. Due to its minimally invasive nature, vertebroplasty is performed under local anesthesia and often as an outpatient procedure, making it an ideal choice for elderly or medically fragile patients who cannot tolerate the prolonged anesthesia or hospitalization required for more invasive surgeries. Moreover, vertebroplasty’s success rate in alleviating pain and stabilizing the fracture is comparable to or even exceeds that of more invasive techniques, making it a highly favorable option, especially when quick pain relief and a return to normal function are primary treatment goals. However, the choice between these options depends on various factors such as the degree of vertebral collapse, overall bone health, and patient-specific preferences following a thorough discussion of the risks and benefits of each treatment modality.
What Are the Market Dynamics Shaping Vertebroplasty Growth?
The growth in the vertebroplasty market is driven by several factors, including the rising prevalence of osteoporosis and related vertebral fractures, advancements in procedural technology, and shifting patient preferences towards less invasive treatment options. The global aging population is a key driver of demand for vertebroplasty, as osteoporosis is particularly prevalent among older adults, especially postmenopausal women, leading to a surge in the number of patients requiring treatment for vertebral compression fractures. Furthermore, the introduction of innovative cement formulations, such as bioactive and radiopaque cements, has improved procedural safety and outcomes, making vertebroplasty a more attractive option for both patients and healthcare providers. Additionally, improvements in imaging techniques, including the adoption of high-definition fluoroscopy and real-time 3D imaging, have enhanced procedural precision, reducing the risk of complications and cement leakage. The growing preference for outpatient and ambulatory surgical settings has also contributed to the market expansion, as vertebroplasty can often be performed without the need for prolonged hospitalization, thereby reducing overall healthcare costs and increasing patient satisfaction. Consumer behavior trends indicate a rising demand for treatments that offer rapid recovery and minimal disruption to daily life, further fueling the adoption of vertebroplasty. Increased awareness among healthcare professionals and patients about the benefits of early intervention for spinal fractures has led to more proactive treatment strategies, expanding the potential patient base. Furthermore, the entry of new market players and strategic partnerships among key stakeholders are expected to boost competition, foster innovation, and drive down costs, making vertebroplasty more accessible. As a result, the vertebroplasty market is poised for robust growth in the coming years, supported by a combination of demographic trends, technological innovations, and evolving patient and provider preferences.
Select Competitors (Total 42 Featured) -