½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1771567

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð, Á¡À¯À², µ¿Çâ º¸°í¼­ : ÃßÁø À¯Çüº°, Æ®¸®°Å À¯Çüº°, Â÷·® À¯Çüº°, ºÎ¹®º° ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

U.S. Automotive eCall Market Size, Share & Trends Report Analysis By Propulsion Type, By Trigger Type (Manually Initiated eCall, Automatically Initiated eCall ), By Vehicle Type, And Segment Forecasts, 2025 - 2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: Grand View Research | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 120 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 2-10ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡Ø º» »óǰÀº ¿µ¹® ÀÚ·á·Î Çѱ۰ú ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¿¡ ºÒÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â ³»¿ëÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ì ¿µ¹®À» ¿ì¼±ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤È®ÇÑ °ËÅ並 À§ÇØ ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¸¦ Âü°íÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¡¤µ¿Çâ :

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 2024³â¿¡ 3¾ï 6,390¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇß°í, 2025³âºÎÅÍ 2030³â¿¡ °ÉÃÄ CAGR 12.8%¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³¾ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ ½ÃÀåÀº ÁÖ·Î ¾ÈÀü ¿ä±¸ Áõ°¡¿Í Â÷·® ¿¬°á¼ºÀÇ Áøº¸¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ¿©·¯ ÃËÁø¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ¼ºÀåÀ» ÀÌ·ç°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÁÖ ·¹º§ÀÇ ´ç±¹À̳ª ¹Ì±¹ µµ·Î ±³Åë ¾ÈÀü±¹(NHTSA)µîÀÇ Á¶Á÷À¸·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ ¾Ð·ÂÀº ÀÚµ¿Â÷ Á¦Á¶¾÷ü¿¡ Â÷Àç ¾ÈÀü ±â´ÉÀÇ °­È­¸¦ Ã˱¸Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ µÞ¹Þħ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ eCall ±â´Éµµ ÅëÇÕµÈ ADAS(¼±Áø ¿îÀü Áö¿ø ½Ã½ºÅÛ)ÀÇ Ã¤¿ëÀÌ È®´ëÇØ, ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» °¡¼Ó½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¾ÈÀü°ú º¸¾È¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ÒºñÀÚÀÇ Àǽİú ±â´ëµµ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ´ã´çÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡´Â ±³Åë »ç°í »çÀÚ ¼ö¿Í ½Å¼ÓÇÑ ±ä±Þ ´ëÀÀÀÇ Á߿伺À» µÑ·¯½Ñ °ø°ø ¾ÈÀü Ä·ÆäÀΰú ¹Ìµð¾î º¸µµ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ´õ¿í °­ÇØÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹¿¡¼­´Â ±³Åë»ç°í ¹ß»ý·üÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³ô±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ½Å¼ÓÇÑ ´ëÀÀ ´É·ÂÀÇ Á߿伺ÀÌ ºÎ°¢µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. À̸¦ ÅëÇØ ´ëÀÀ ½Ã°£À» ´ëÆø ´ÜÃàÇϰí ÀθíÀ» ±¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

»ó´ë¹æ »óÇ¥ Á¦Ç° Á¦Á¶¾÷ü(OEM)´Â ¶ÇÇÑ Á¦Ç° Â÷º°È­ Àü·«ÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î eCall ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» äÅÃÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀϺηΠ¹øµéµÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹¾Æ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¼Ò±¸·ÂÀ» ³ôÀ̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, º¸Çè ¾÷°è´Â ¼±Áø ¾ÈÀü ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» žÀçÇÑ Â÷·®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸Çè·áÀÇ ÇÒÀÎ µîÀÇ Àμ¾Æ¼ºê¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î, eCall ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå¿¡ °øÇåÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

À¯¸ÁÇÑ ¼ºÀå ±âȸ¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸Çϰí, ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall »ê¾÷Àº ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ Ã¤¿ë°ú È®À强À» Á¦ÇÑÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¸î °¡Áö Á¦¾à¿¡ Á÷¸éÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý°ú ¹üÀ§

Á¦2Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦3Àå ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall º¯¼ö, µ¿Çâ, ¹üÀ§

  • ½ÃÀå °èÅë Àü¸Á
  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ ºÐ¼®
    • ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ ºÐ¼®
    • ¾÷°èÀÇ °úÁ¦
  • ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ºÐ¼® µµ±¸
    • ¾÷°è ºÐ¼® - Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
    • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦4Àå ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ½ÃÀå : ÃßÁø À¯Çü ÃßÁ¤¡¤µ¿Ç⠺м®

  • ºÎ¹® ´ë½Ãº¸µå
  • ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ½ÃÀå : ÃßÁø À¯Çü º¯µ¿ ºÐ¼®(2024³â ¹× 2030³â)
  • ICE
  • Àü±â ¸ðÅÍ

Á¦5Àå ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ½ÃÀå : Æ®¸®°Å À¯Çü ÃßÁ¤¡¤µ¿Ç⠺м®

  • ºÎ¹® ´ë½Ãº¸µå
  • ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ½ÃÀå : Æ®¸®°Å À¯Çü º¯µ¿ ºÐ¼®(2024³â ¹× 2030³â)
  • ¼öµ¿ ½ÃÀÛ eCall(MIeC)
  • ÀÚµ¿ ½ÃÀÛ eCall(AIeC)

Á¦6Àå ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ½ÃÀå : Â÷·® À¯Çü ÃßÁ¤¡¤µ¿Ç⠺м®

  • ºÎ¹® ´ë½Ãº¸µå
  • ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ eCall ½ÃÀå : Â÷·® À¯Çüº° º¯µ¿ ºÐ¼®(2024³â ¹× 2030³â)
  • ½Â¿ëÂ÷
  • »ó¿ëÂ÷

Á¦7Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ±â¾÷ ºÐ·ù
  • ±â¾÷ÀÇ ½ÃÀå Æ÷Áö¼Å´×
  • ±â¾÷ È÷Æ®¸Ê ºÐ¼®
  • ±â¾÷ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ/»óÀå ±â¾÷
    • HARMAN International
    • Continental AG
    • OnStar(General Motors)
    • DENSO CORPORATION
    • Robert Bosch GmbH
    • Aptiv
    • Telit Cinterion
    • Visteon Corporation
    • Infineon Technologies AG
    • STMicroelectronics
KTH

U.S. Automotive eCall Market Size & Trends:

The U.S. automotive eCall market size was estimated at USD 363.9 million in 2024 and is expected to register a CAGR of 12.8% from 2025 to 2030. The market is experiencing growth due to several converging drivers, primarily linked to increasing safety demands and advancements in vehicle connectivity. One of the foremost catalysts is the growing emphasis on vehicle safety from both consumers and regulatory bodies. While there is no federal mandate for eCall systems, pressure from state-level authorities and organizations such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) encourages automakers to enhance in-vehicle safety features. This push has expanded the adoption of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), which also integrate eCall functionalities, helping to accelerate market growth.

Consumer awareness and expectations for safety and security are also playing a pivotal role. More vehicle buyers are prioritizing safety in their purchase decisions, seeking features that can offer real-time assistance during emergencies. eCall systems, which automatically notify emergency services in the event of a serious collision, are increasingly viewed as critical components of vehicle safety. This heightened demand is further reinforced by public safety campaigns and media coverage surrounding road accident fatalities and the importance of rapid emergency response.

The relatively high rate of road accidents in the U.S. underscores the importance of rapid response capabilities. eCall systems, by automatically alerting emergency services with precise location and crash details, can significantly reduce response times and potentially save lives. This value proposition resonates strongly with consumers and policymakers alike, especially in densely populated and traffic-congested urban areas.

Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) are also pushing the adoption of eCall systems as part of their product differentiation strategies. Many leading U.S. automakers have integrated eCall into broader safety and connectivity service packages, such as GM's OnStar. These offerings are often bundled as part of premium trims or subscription-based services, adding to their appeal in the market. Additionally, the insurance industry is contributing to the growth of the eCall market by offering incentives such as reduced premiums for vehicles equipped with advanced safety systems. This aligns with the broader trend of usage-based insurance (UBI), which relies on telematics and enhances the utility of eCall systems.

Despite promising growth opportunities, the U.S. Automotive eCall industry faces several restraints that may limit its broader adoption and scalability. One of the primary challenges is the lack of a federal mandate, which leads to inconsistent implementation across vehicle classes and brands. Without regulatory enforcement, some OEMs may deprioritize the inclusion of eCall in lower-end models. Additionally, privacy and data security concerns are significant barriers. Since eCall systems rely on transmitting vehicle and location data in real time, many consumers are wary of potential misuse or breaches of sensitive information.

U.S. Automotive eCall Market Report Segmentation

This report forecasts revenue growth at country level and provides an analysis on the industry trends in each of the sub-segments from 2018 to 2030. For the purpose of this study, Grand View Research has segmented the U.S. automotive eCall market report based on propulsion type, trigger type, and vehicle type.

  • Propulsion Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)
  • ICE
  • Electric Motor
  • Trigger Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)
  • Manually Initiated eCall (MIeC)
  • Automatically Initiated eCall (AIeC)
  • Vehicle Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)
  • Passenger Cars
  • Commercial Vehicles

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Market Segmentation and Scope
  • 1.2. Research Methodology
    • 1.2.1. Information Procurement
  • 1.3. Information or Data Analysis
  • 1.4. Methodology
  • 1.5. Research Scope and Assumptions
  • 1.6. Market Formulation & Validation
  • 1.7. Country Based Segment Share Calculation
  • 1.8. List of Data Sources

Chapter 2. Executive Summary

  • 2.1. Market Outlook
  • 2.2. Segment Outlook
  • 2.3. Competitive Insights

Chapter 3. U.S. Automotive eCall Variables, Trends, & Scope

  • 3.1. Market Lineage Outlook
  • 3.2. Market Dynamics
    • 3.2.1. Market Drivers Analysis
    • 3.2.2. Market Restraints Analysis
    • 3.2.3. Industry Challenge
  • 3.3. U.S. Automotive eCall Analysis Tools
    • 3.3.1. Industry Analysis - Porter's
      • 3.3.1.1. Bargaining Power Of The Suppliers
      • 3.3.1.2. Bargaining Power Of The Buyers
      • 3.3.1.3. Threats Of Substitution
      • 3.3.1.4. Threats From New Entrants
      • 3.3.1.5. Competitive Rivalry
    • 3.3.2. PESTEL Analysis

Chapter 4. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Propulsion Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 4.1. Segment Dashboard
  • 4.2. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Propulsion Type Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030 (USD Million)
  • 4.3. ICE
    • 4.3.1. ICE Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • 4.4. Electric Motor
    • 4.4.1. Electric Motor Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 5. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Trigger Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 5.1. Segment Dashboard
  • 5.2. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Trigger Type Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030 (USD Million)
  • 5.3. Manually Initiated eCall (MIeC)
    • 5.3.1. Manually Initiated eCall (MIeC) Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • 5.4. Automatically Initiated eCall (AIeC)
    • 5.4.1. Automatically Initiated eCall (AIeC) Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 6. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Vehicle Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 6.1. Segment Dashboard
  • 6.2. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Vehicle Type Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030 (USD Million)
  • 6.3. Passenger Cars
    • 6.3.1. Passenger Cars Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • 6.4. Commercial Vehicles
    • 6.4.1. Commercial Vehicles Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 7. Competitive Landscape

  • 7.1. Company Categorization
  • 7.2. Company Market Positioning
  • 7.3. Company Heat Map Analysis
  • 7.4. Company Profiles/Listing
    • 7.4.1. HARMAN International
      • 7.4.1.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.1.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.1.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.1.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.2. Continental AG
      • 7.4.2.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.2.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.2.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.2.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.3. OnStar (General Motors)
      • 7.4.3.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.3.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.3.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.3.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.4. DENSO CORPORATION
      • 7.4.4.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.4.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.4.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.4.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.5. Robert Bosch GmbH
      • 7.4.5.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.5.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.5.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.5.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.6. Aptiv
      • 7.4.6.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.6.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.6.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.6.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.7. Telit Cinterion
      • 7.4.7.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.7.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.7.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.7.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.8. Visteon Corporation
      • 7.4.8.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.8.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.8.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.8.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.9. Infineon Technologies AG
      • 7.4.9.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.9.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.9.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.9.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.10. STMicroelectronics
      • 7.4.10.1. Participant's Overview
      • 7.4.10.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.10.3. Application Benchmarking
      • 7.4.10.4. Strategic Initiatives
»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦