인도의 치과 임플란트 시장 : 시장 규모, 점유율, 동향 분석(2025-2031년)

The Indian dental implant and final abutment market was valued at over 152 million dollars in 2024. The market is projected to grow to over 348 million dollars by 2031.

This report suite covers dental implants, final abutments, treatment planning software, and surgical guides.

Quantitative coverage includes unit sales, average selling prices, market size, growth rates, and company shares.

Qualitative coverage includes market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, and competitive positioning across private clinics, dental hospitals, group practices, and laboratories.

India is one of the fastest growing implant markets worldwide. Strong demand for tooth replacement, a large base of trained dentists, and rising interest in aesthetics support high unit growth.

At the same time, India is highly price sensitive. This shapes procurement, shifts share toward value and discount systems in routine cases, and pressures average selling prices for implants and, in selected situations, for abutments.

The spread of digital dentistry is steady but uneven. Costs slow adoption at smaller clinics, while teaching hospitals and larger urban practices move faster with CBCT planning, guided surgery, and CAD or CAM abutments.

Market Overview

Implant dentistry in India combines a large potential patient base with rapid professional training and a growing digital infrastructure in top-tier clinics. The clinical core is the implant fixture placed in bone and the final abutment that connects the fixture to the restoration. Around this core, adoption of CBCT imaging and computer-guided surgery is expanding. These tools help visualize bone quality, map nerves and sinus anatomy, and plan implant position and depth. Surgical guides then translate the plan into more precise placement, which reduces adjustments and chair time in the restorative phase.

Budget constraints and price sensitivity remain decisive. Clinics balance up-front device costs, the need for predictable outcomes, and the time savings from digital workflows.

As a result, value and discount implants win share in single-tooth and other straightforward indications, while premium implants remain important for complex cases, full arch therapies, and centers that rely on deep prosthetic catalogues and long clinical histories.

On the prosthetic side, stock titanium abutments remain the default for routine cases. CAD or CAM abutments gain share in clinics and labs that already scan, design, and mill restorations and want custom emergence profiles and fine control of soft tissue.

A standout feature of the Indian market is the scale of dental education. With about 420 dental colleges and rising enrollment, more graduates are trained on implant workflows. A substantial number of implant-supported partial and full-arch cases are completed in academic settings. This changes the entry profile of new dentists and supports faster diffusion of implant therapy into general practice.

Market Drivers

Improved supporting technology. The growth of implant dentistry is reinforced by wider use of CBCT scanners and planning software that create accurate 3D jaw models, guide osteotomy position, and improve confidence in first-time placement. Surgical guides built from these plans help control angulation and depth and reduce intraoperative variability. These tools shorten chair time and lower the rate of restorative adjustments. India will see steady adoption, although high equipment costs mean some smaller clinics will transition more slowly.

Demand for improved aesthetics. Implants are widely regarded as the best aesthetic solution for single-tooth replacement, and single-tooth cases are the fastest growing application. Rising interest in cosmetic dentistry and patient preference for fixed, natural-looking teeth increase implant selection over bridges. Implants also preserve adjacent teeth and can support papillae and soft tissue form.

Dental education. India's approximately 420 dental colleges emphasize modern procedures, including implantology. Many partial and full-arch cases are completed in academic programs, which familiarizes graduates with implant workflows and raises procedural confidence from the start of practice. As more graduates enter the workforce with implant exposure, adoption continues to accelerate.

Long-term value case. Over the lifetime of care, implants often cost less than multiple bridge or denture replacements. Because fixtures can last many years and because screw-retained designs allow maintenance without destroying the restoration, the total cost of ownership can favor implants when budgets allow.

Market Limiters

Improvements in dental health. Better oral health reduces the pool of severe restorative cases. This partially offsets growth from an aging population and can slow the expansion of complex, multi-unit treatments that would otherwise support higher implant and abutment revenues.

Costs and the public health system. There is no public insurance coverage for major dental procedures such as bridges, crowns, or orthodontics. Most patients pay out of pocket unless they have supplemental dental insurance. Relative to local income levels, implant treatment is expensive, which delays or prevents adoption in a large share of the population.

Price sensitivity and ASP compression. Growth in value and discount implants raises unit volumes but lowers overall ASPs. Even premium brands respond with targeted discounts to remain competitive. Similar pressure affects abutments where clinics choose lower-cost stock options for routine cases and limit custom abutments to clear clinical need.

Market Coverage and Data Scope

Quantitative coverage. Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and average selling prices.

Qualitative coverage. Growth drivers and limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles and product portfolios, device and workflow trends, and the demographic and economic context that shapes demand.

Time frame. Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2024.

Data sources. Primary interviews with industry leaders, government and regulatory data, dental hospital and clinic inputs, import and export data, and the iData Research internal database.

Method note. Revenues are modeled as units X ASP, validated with procedure volumes, adoption rates by care setting, and price tiers across premium, value, and discount segments.

Markets Covered and Segmentation

Dental Implants Market

Type. Premium, value, discount.

Shape. Parallel wall, tapered.

Material. Titanium, ceramic or zirconia.

Procedure type. One-stage, two-stage, immediate loading.

Connection type. Internal connection, external connection, one-piece.

Application. Single-tooth application, multi-tooth bridge partial arch securement, multi-tooth bridge full arch securement, denture securement.

Final Abutment Market

Fabrication. Stock, custom cast, CAD or CAM.

Material. Titanium, ceramic or zirconia, gold.

Type. Cement-retained, screw-retained, denture retaining.

Instrument Kit Market

Treatment Planning Software Market

Surgical Guide Market

Competitive Analysis

Straumann Group was the leading competitor in 2024. The company benefits from strong brand recognition and a long track record of best-in-class implants. In premium implants it held the second-highest share while sustaining leadership at the total market level through a comprehensive suite of implant-related products. The Neodent value brand outperformed the market average in the value tier, which strengthens Straumann's overall position by serving both premium and value buyers. Strategic acquisitions have broadened capabilities and improved coverage across indications and price points.

Envista ranked second overall through brands such as Nobel Biocare and Implant Direct. Envista sells across implants, final abutments, and surgical guides and holds a clear leadership position in the final abutment segment. About 40 percent of company revenue stems from implants and benefits from demographics, digitization, and the growth of DSOs. A diversified portfolio helps mitigate macroeconomic risk while supporting clinics with different budget and workflow needs.

Osstem Implant ranked third in 2024. The company focuses on the value segment and offers the TS, SS, US, and MS systems. Osstem invests in R&D, education, and marketing to expand its base and to support a wide range of implant procedures. Global expansion, AIC education programs, and active promotion are expected to support steady share gains, especially in clinics that prioritize affordability and throughput.

Local distributors and regional brands participate in selected niches, often serving clinics that seek short lead times, competitive pricing, and reliable access to core parts. Success factors across competitors include training, clinical support, digital integrations, clear restorative catalogs, and consistent supply.

Technology and Practice Trends

Guided surgery and digital planning. CBCT-based plans and surgical guides are spreading across dental hospitals and larger private clinics. The benefits are greater precision, fewer surprises at placement, and a smoother restorative phase. Smaller clinics adopt these tools as budgets allow or partner with labs that provide design and guide services.

Internal connections and tapered designs. Internal connections are common due to prosthetic stability and torque control. Tapered designs support primary stability in a range of bone qualities and align well with immediate or early loading protocols when clinical criteria are met.

Material choices. Titanium dominates for strength and osseointegration. Zirconia implants and abutments serve anterior aesthetics and metal-free preferences. Zirconia abutments are often paired with titanium bases in hybrid designs when strength and esthetics are both important.

Stock versus CAD or CAM abutments. Stock titanium abutments remain the default in routine posterior and single-tooth cases due to cost control and availability. CAD or CAM abutments gain share where clinics or labs have the digital stack to deliver custom emergence profiles, angulation corrections, and screw-retained access alignment. Custom cast remains relevant for legacy connections and unusual angulations.

Retrievability and cement control. Screw-retained strategies are preferred where retrievability and maintenance are priorities. Cement-retained designs continue where cost is critical, supported by strict cement control protocols to protect peri-implant tissues.

Procurement and Pricing Dynamics

Clinic decisions factor device price, expected chair time, likelihood of remakes, and patient satisfaction. In single-tooth and short-span cases, value and discount systems dominate because they meet clinical needs at lower cost. For full-arch and complex cases, clinics often select premium systems with deep prosthetic catalogs, established surfaces, and broad evidence. Procurement also reflects service and training availability, which can be decisive for general practitioners expanding into implants.

ASPs are under pressure as clinics favor lower cost fixtures for routine indications and reserve premium options for specific needs. Vendors respond with targeted discounts, bundles that tie implants to scan bodies and abutment libraries, and education programs that improve confidence. On the abutment side, clinics use stock abutments for everyday restorations and adopt CAD or CAM abutments where soft tissue and emergence need custom shaping or where screw access needs precise positioning.

Care Settings and Workflows

Most implants are placed in private clinics, with dental hospitals and teaching institutions handling complex cases and a large volume of academic placements. Laboratories are central to outcomes, since they influence abutment selection, emergence design, and final crown delivery. Digital workflows depend on scanner availability, file exchange with partner labs, and the lab's capacity to design and mill CAD or CAM abutments and restorations. Some clinics mill in-house, but most custom abutments run through labs that manage materials and finishing to meet tissue management and esthetics goals.

Education shapes adoption. Academic programs introduce implant placement and restoration early, while vendor training, study clubs, and mentorships help general practitioners standardize drilling sequences, torque values, and restorative steps. This ecosystem supports higher case throughput and smoother transitions from planning to restoration.

Market Dynamics by Category

Dental implants. Unit growth is strong and outpaces many other dental markets due to a growing trained workforce, aesthetics demand, and value system availability. Titanium dominates across indications. Zirconia implants serve a smaller, aesthetics-focused niche.

Final abutments. Stock titanium abutments lead in volume due to cost and availability. CAD or CAM abutments expand where digital planning and scanning are present and where soft tissue outcomes and screw-channel alignment are important. Custom cast solutions persist for legacy systems and complex angles.

Treatment planning software. Adoption grows with CBCT installs and with clinics and labs that seek guided workflows. Licenses may be bundled with implant systems or offered through lab partners that design guides and abutments.

Surgical guides. Demand rises with planning software use. Guides help standardize outcomes, which lowers chair time and reduces rework, especially for newer GP implanters.

Geography

This edition focuses on India.

Why This Report

Where is the largest and fastest growing opportunity within India's implant and final abutment market, and how will price tiers shape revenue through 2031.

How will digitization change everyday workflows, and what pull-through should vendors expect for treatment planning software, scan bodies, surgical guides, and CAD or CAM abutments as CBCT and scanners spread.

Which abutment formats will gain share, and how will stock, custom cast, and CAD or CAM options balance cost, soft tissue management, access hole alignment, and retrievability.

How will education and training at dental colleges and teaching hospitals influence adoption among new graduates and general practitioners.

Which competitors are best positioned based on portfolio breadth, education programs, local service, and the ability to serve both premium and value buyers in a mixed budget environment.

What risks could slow growth, including ASP compression, slower digital adoption in smaller clinics, and limited access to financing for high-end equipment.

The India Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market report from iData Research answers these questions with segment and price-tier models, company share analysis, and practical coverage of digital and surgical workflows. Use it to size demand by category, plan product roadmaps, align pricing with local expectations, and design training and support programs that reduce variability and remakes.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Research Methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

India Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market

• 7.1 Executive Summary
  • 7.1.1 India Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market Overview
  • 7.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 7.1.3 Market Trends
  • 7.1.4 End User Analysis
  • 7.1.5 Market Segmentation
• 7.2 Introduction
  • 7.2.1 Dental Implants
  • 7.2.2 Final Abutments
  • 7.2.3 Dental Implant Instrument Kits
    • 7.2.3.1 Instrument Kit Bundling
  • 7.2.4 Treatment Planning Software Market
  • 7.2.5 Surgical Guides
• 7.3 Unit and End User Analysis
  • 7.3.1 End Users of Dental Implants
  • 7.3.2 Dental Implant Unit Analysis
    • 7.3.2.1 Dental Implant Unit Sales by Application
    • 7.3.2.1.1 Single-Tooth Replacement
    • 7.3.2.1.2 Multi-Tooth Bridge Partial and Full Arch Securement
    • 7.3.2.1.3 Denture Securement
    • 7.3.2.2 Dental Implant Secured Dentures Unit Sales by Type
• 7.4 Currency Exchange Rate
• 7.5 Market Overview
• 7.6 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 7.6.1 Dental Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.1 Dental Implant Market by Segment
    • 7.6.1.1.1 Premium Dental Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.1.2 Value Dental Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.1.3 Discount Dental Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.2 Dental Implant Market by Material
    • 7.6.1.2.1 Titanium Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.2.2 Ceramic/Zirconia Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.3 Dental Implant Market by Shape
    • 7.6.1.3.1 Parallel-Wall Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.3.2 Tapered Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.4 Dental Implant Market by Procedure Type
    • 7.6.1.4.1 One-Stage Surgery Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.4.2 Two-Stage Surgery Procedure Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.4.3 Immediate Loading Procedure Implant Market
    • 7.6.1.5 Dental Implant Market by Connection Type
    • 7.6.1.5.1 Internal Connection
    • 7.6.1.5.2 External Connection
    • 7.6.1.5.3 One-Piece
  • 7.6.2 Final Abutment Market
    • 7.6.2.1 Final Abutment Market by Segment
    • 7.6.2.1.1 Stock Abutment Market
    • 7.6.2.1.2 Custom Cast Abutment Market
    • 7.6.2.1.3 CAD/CAM Abutment Market
    • 7.6.2.2 Final Abutment Market by Material
    • 7.6.2.2.1 Titanium Abutment Market
    • 7.6.2.2.2 Ceramic/Zirconia Abutment Market
    • 7.6.2.2.3 Gold Abutment Market
    • 7.6.2.3 Final Abutment by Type
    • 7.6.2.3.1 Cement-Retained Abutment Market
    • 7.6.2.3.2 Screw-Retained Abutment Market
    • 7.6.2.3.3 Denture Retaining Abutment Market
  • 7.6.3 Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market
  • 7.6.4 Treatment Planning Software Market
  • 7.6.5 Surgical Guide Market
• 7.7 Drivers and Limiters
  • 7.7.1 Market Drivers
  • 7.7.2 Market Limiters
• 7.8 Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 7.8.1 Dental Implant Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 7.8.2 Final Abutment Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 7.8.3 Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 7.8.4 Treatment Planning Software Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 7.8.5 Surgical Guide Market Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abrreviations