![]() |
½ÃÀ庸°í¼
»óǰÄÚµå
1519429
¼¼°èÀÇ ÀüÀå °ü¸® ½ÃÀå º¸°í¼ : Ç÷§Æûº°, ºÎǰº°, ½Ã½ºÅÛº°, ¿ëµµº°, Áö¿ªº°(2024-2032³â)Battlefield Management Market Report by Platform, Component, System, Application, and Region 2024-2032 |
¼¼°è ÀüÀå °ü¸® ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 2023³â 114¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÇâÈÄ IMARC GroupÀº 2024-2032³â¿¡ °ÉÃÄ 3.3%ÀÇ ¼ºÀå·ü(CAGR)À» º¸À̸ç 2032³â±îÁö 154¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀüÀå¿¡¼ ½Ç½Ã°£ »óȲ ÀνĿ¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ä±¸°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ±Þ¼ÓÈ÷ º¯ÈÇÏ´Â Çö´ë ÀüÅõ Àü·«, ±º»ç ÀÛÀüÀÇ º¹ÀâÈ´Â ½ÃÀåÀ» °ßÀÎÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ¿äÀÎ Áß ÇϳªÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
ÀüÀå °ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛ(BMS)Àº ÀüÀåÀÇ ÁöÈÖ°ü¿¡°Ô »óȲ ÀνÄÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ±º»ç ÁöÈÖ ÅëÁ¦ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÔ´Ï´Ù. BMS´Â ÀüÀå¿¡ ¹èÄ¡µÈ Åë½Å ³×Æ®¿öÅ©¿¡ ÀÇÇØ »ý¼ºµÈ ´ë·®ÀÇ Á¤º¸¸¦ °ü¸® ¹× ó¸®ÇÏ´Â ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ÀüÀå ¼¾¼, Åë½Å ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅÍ °ü¸® µµ±¸¸¦ ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ÀÛµ¿ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. BMS´Â ÁöÈÖ°üÀÌ Àû ¾Æ±º ¾ç±ºÀÇ À§Ä¡¸¦ ÃßÀûÇϰí ÁøÇà ÁßÀÎ ÀÛÀüÀÇ ÁøÇà »óȲÀ» °¨½ÃÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº ÁöÈÖ°üÀÌ »óȲ º¯È¿¡ ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°Ô ´ëÀÀÇÏ°í ½Ç½Ã°£ Á¤º¸¸¦ ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ÀÇ»ç °áÁ¤À» ³»¸®´Â µ¥ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ °øÅë ÀÛÀü À̹ÌÁö(COP)¸¦ ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù. BMSÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¸ñÀûÀº ±ºÀÎÀÇ ÀÇ»ç °áÁ¤ ´É·ÂÀ» ³ôÀ̰í ÀÓ¹«ÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ Çâ»ó½Ã۰í ÀüÀå¿¡¼ ±ºÀÎÀÌ Á÷¸éÇÏ´Â À§ÇèÀ» ÁÙÀÌ´Â °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. BMS´Â È®À强°ú À¯¿¬¼ºÀ» °®Ãß°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ´Ù¾çÇÑ ±ººÎ´ëÀÇ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ¿ä±¸ »çÇ׿¡ ¸Â°Ô »ç¿ëÀÚ Á¤ÀÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ¼³°èµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. BMSÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ÀÌÁ¡À¸·Î´Â ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ ´É·Â Çâ»ó, À§Çè °¨¼Ò, ÀÓ¹« È¿À²¼º Çâ»ó, Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀÌ¼Ç °³¼±, ºñ¿ë È¿°ú µîÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ÀüÀï Áß ½Ç½Ã°£ »óȲ ÀνĿ¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ä±¸ Áõ°¡´Â ½ÃÀåÀ» °ßÀÎÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ä¼ÒÀÔ´Ï´Ù. À̰ÍÀº ±Þº¯ÇÏ´Â Çö´ë ÀüÅõ Àü·«ÀÌ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© Á᫐ ÀüÀïÀÇ Ã¤Åà Áõ°¡·Î À̾îÁö°í Àֱ⠶§¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±º»ç ÀÛÀüÀÇ º¹ÀâÈ·Î ÀÎÇØ ¿©·¯ ¼Ò½º·ÎºÎÅÍ »ý¼ºµÈ µ¥ÀÌÅͷκÎÅÍ ÅëÇÕµÈ Á¤º¸ÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ½ÃÀåÀÌ È°¼ºÈµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ¹æÀ§½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ±Ù´ëȸ¦ À§ÇÑ °¢±¹ Á¤ºÎ±â°üÀÇ ÅõÀÚµµ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ¾î Á¦Ç°ÀÇ º¸±ÞÀÌ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀΰøÁö´É, ¸Ó½Å·¯´×, »ç¹°ÀÎÅͳÝ(IoT) µîÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ±â¼ú Áøº¸°¡ º¸´Ù Á¤±³ÇÏ°í °í¼º´ÉÀÎ BMSÀÇ °³¹ßÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÀåÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Çö´ë ÀüÀï¿¡¼ ¹«ÀÎ Ç×°ø±â, ¹«ÀÎ Áö»ó Â÷·®(UGV), ¹«ÀÎ ¼öÁß Â÷·®(UUV)°ú °°Àº ¹«ÀÎ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡°¡ ÀüÀå °ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¼ö¿ä¸¦ ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °Ô´Ù°¡ ±ºÀÎÀÇ »óȲ ÀνÄ, º¸È£, È·ÂÀ» °ÈÇϱâ À§ÇØ ±ºÀÎÀÇ ¾ÈÀü°ú º¸¾È¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁßÁ¡ÀÌ °ÈµÇ¾î ½ÃÀåÀ» °ßÀÎÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. À̿ʹ º°µµ·Î, ¿©·¯ ºÎ´ë¿Í ±¹°¡°¡ °ü¿©ÇÏ´Â È¿°úÀûÀÎ ±º»ç ÀÛÀüÀ» À§ÇÑ »óÈ£¿î¿ë¼ºÀÇ Çʿ伺 Áõ°¡°¡ BMSÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ µµÀÔÀ¸·Î À̾îÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±âŸ ½ÃÀå È®´ë ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î´Â Å×·¯, ¹Ý¶õ, »çÀ̹ö °ø°Ý µîÀÇ ºñ´ëĪ À§Çù Áõ°¡, ±¹°æ °æºñ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁÖ¸ñ Áõ°¡, ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ µµ½ÃÈ, ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ R&D Ȱµ¿ µîÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
The global battlefield management market size reached US$ 11.4 Billion in 2023. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach US$ 15.4 Billion by 2032, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 3.3% during 2024-2032. The escalating need for real-time situational awareness during warfare, rapidly changing modern battle strategies, and the increasing complexity of military operations represent some of the key factors driving the market.
A battlefield management system (BMS) is a military command and control system that provides situational awareness to commanders in the battlefield. It functions by integrating a wide range of battlefield sensors, communication networks, and data management tools, which manage and process large amounts of information generated by communication networks deployed in the battlefield. BMS enables commanders to track the location of both friendly and enemy forces and to monitor the progress of ongoing operations. The system provides a common operational picture (COP) that is crucial for enabling commanders to respond quickly to changing situations and make informed decisions based on real-time information. The primary objective of a BMS is to enhance the decision-making capabilities of military personnel, improve mission effectiveness, and reduce the risks faced by personnel on the battlefield. BMS is designed to be scalable and flexible, with the capability to be customized to meet the specific requirements of different military units. Some of the key advantages of a BMS include improved decision-making capabilities, reduced risks, enhanced mission effectiveness, improved communication, and cost-effectiveness.
The escalating need for real-time situational awareness during warfare is a significant factor driving the market. This can be attributed to the rapidly changing modern battle strategies leading to the rising adoption of network-centric warfare. The increasing complexity of military operations is resulting in the growing need for consolidated information from data generated by multiple sources, thereby fueling the market. In line with this, the rising investments by government bodies of several countries in the modernization of defense systems is resulting in a higher product uptake. Moreover, continual technological advancements such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and the Internet of Things (IoT) enabling the development of more sophisticated and capable BMS is propelling the market. Additionally, the increasing demand for unmanned systems such as unmanned systems such as drones, unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), and unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) in modern warfare is propelling the demand for battlefield management systems. The market is further driven by an enhanced focus on soldier safety and security to enhance their situational awareness, protection, and firepower. Apart from this, the growing need for interoperability for effective military operations involving multiple units and countries is leading to rapid adoption of BMS. Some of the other factors contributing to the market include the growing asymmetrical threats such as terrorism, insurgency, and cyber attacks, rising focus on border security, rapid urbanization, and extensive research and development (R&D) activities.
IMARC Group provides an analysis of the key trends in each sub-segment of the global battlefield management market report, along with forecasts at the global, regional and country level from 2024-2032. Our report has categorized the market based on platform, component, system and application.
Vehicle
Headquarter
Soldier
The report has provided a detailed breakup and analysis of the battlefield management market based on the platform. This includes vehicle, headquarter and soldier. According to the report, vehicle represented the largest segment.
Wireless Communication Devices
Imaging Devices
Computer Software
Tracking Devices
Wired Communication Devices
Computer Hardware Devices
Night Vision Devices
Display Devices
Others
The report has provided a detailed breakup and analysis of the battlefield management market based on the component. This includes wireless communication devices, imaging devices, computer software, tracking devices, wired communication devices, computer hardware devices, night vision devices, display devices, and others. According to the report, computer hardware devices represented the largest segment.
Navigation and Imaging System
Communication and Networking System
Computing System
The report has provided a detailed breakup and analysis of the battlefield management market based on the system. This includes navigation and imaging system, communication and networking system, and computing system. According to the report, computing system represented the largest segment.
Army
Air Force
Navy
A detailed breakup and analysis of the battlefield management market based on the application has also been provided in the report. This includes army, air force, and navy. According to the report, army accounted for the largest market share.
North America
United States
Canada
Asia Pacific
China
Japan
India
South Korea
Australia
Indonesia
Others
Europe
Germany
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Spain
Russia
Others
Latin America
Brazil
Mexico
Others
Middle East and Africa
The report has also provided a comprehensive analysis of all the major regional markets, which include North America (the United States and Canada); Europe (Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Russia and others); Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia, Indonesia, and others); Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, and others); and the Middle East and Africa. According to the report, North America was the largest market for battlefield management. Some of the factors driving the North America battlefield management market included the growing asymmetrical threats, such as terrorism, insurgency, and cyber attacks, rising focus on border security, presence of several key players, etc.
The report has also provided a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape in the global battlefield management market. Competitive analysis such as market structure, market share by key players, player positioning, top winning strategies, competitive dashboard, and company evaluation quadrant has been covered in the report. Also, detailed profiles of all major companies have been provided. Some of the companies covered include Aselsan A.S., BAE Systems plc, Cobham Limited, Elbit Systems Ltd., General Dynamics Corporation, Indra Sistemas S.A., Israel Aerospace Industries, L3harris Technologies Inc., Leonardo SpA, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Rheinmetall AG, Rolta India Limited, RUAG Group, Thales Group., etc. Kindly note that this only represents a partial list of companies, and the complete list has been provided in the report.