내부 외상 고정 디바이스 시장 보고서 : 제품별, 재료별, 최종 사용자별, 지역별(2024-2032년)

The global internal trauma fixation device market size reached US$ 10.2 Billion in 2023. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach US$ 15.3 Billion by 2032, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 4.5% during 2024-2032.

Internal trauma fixation devices refer to the biologically inert medical tools implanted for the stabilization of fractured bones in the body. Some of the commonly used devices include cannulated screws, intramedullary nails, hip screws, cables, wires, plates and pins. They are manufactured using stainless steel, tritium, nitinol, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), nickel and titanium and are corrosion resistant and adjustable according to the bone structure. They aid in maintaining the original shape of the bone and facilitate repair by restricting the movement of fractured bones. As a result, they are widely used across hospitals, orthopedic surgical centers and trauma and ambulatory centers.

Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market Trends:

The increasing prevalence of orthopedic disorders, along with the rising geriatric population across the globe, is one of the key factors driving the growth of the market. Moreover, the rising incidence of road accidents and sports-related injuries are providing a thrust to the market growth. The internal trauma fixation devices are widely used for elderly patients, which are more prone to fractures and joint dislocation due to osteoporosis and other bone-related disorders. This has further led to the increasing adoption of biocompatible, elastic and fatigue and kink-resistant closure devices, which is also contributing to the market growth. In line with this, the increasing adoption of minimally invasive (MI) surgical procedures for the placement of internal trauma fixation devices is favoring the growth of the market. Additionally, various innovations in implant technologies and the development of cement-augmented transiliacal internal fixators are acting as other growth-inducing factors. These devices provide improved stabilization of fractures in the pelvis. Other factors, including the rising healthcare expenditure capacities of the masses, along with extensive research and development (R&D) activities, are anticipated to drive the market toward growth.

Key Market Segmentation:

IMARC Group provides an analysis of the key trends in each sub-segment of the global internal trauma fixation device market report, along with forecasts at the global, regional and country level from 2024-2032. Our report has categorized the market based on product, material and end user.

Breakup by Product:

• Closure Device
  • Plates and Screws
  • Wires
  • Clips and Pins
  • Rods and Nails
  • Cables
• Bone Cement

Breakup by Material:

• Stainless Steel
• Nitinol
• Titanium
• Tritium
• Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)

Breakup by End User:

• Hospitals
• Orthopedic Surgical Centers
• Trauma Centers
• Ambulatory Centers

Breakup by Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • Japan
  • India
  • South Korea
  • Australia
  • Indonesia
  • Others
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Spain
  • Russia
  • Others
• Latin America
  • Brazil
  • Mexico
  • Others
• Middle East and Africa

Competitive Landscape:

The competitive landscape of the industry has also been examined along with the profiles of the key players being Arthrex Inc., B. Braun Melsungen AG, Globus Medical Inc., Johnson & Johnson Private Limited, Medartis AG, Orthofix Medical Inc., Orthopaedic Implant Company, OsteoMed (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.), Smith & Nephew plc, Stryker Corporation and Zimmer Biomet.

Key Questions Answered in This Report

• 1. How big is the global internal trauma fixation device market?
• 2. What is the expected growth rate of the global internal trauma fixation device market during 2024-2032?
• 3. What are the key factors driving the global internal trauma fixation device market?
• 4. What has been the impact of COVID-19 on the global internal trauma fixation device market?
• 5. What is the breakup of the global internal trauma fixation device market based on the product?
• 6. What is the breakup of the global internal trauma fixation device market based on the material?
• 7. What is the breakup of the global internal trauma fixation device market based on the end user?
• 8. What are the key regions in the global internal trauma fixation device market?
• 9. Who are the key players/companies in the global internal trauma fixation device market?

Table of Contents

1 Preface

2 Scope and Methodology

• 2.1 Objectives of the Study
• 2.2 Stakeholders
• 2.3 Data Sources
  • 2.3.1 Primary Sources
  • 2.3.2 Secondary Sources
• 2.4 Market Estimation
  • 2.4.1 Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.4.2 Top-Down Approach
• 2.5 Forecasting Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Introduction

• 4.1 Overview
• 4.2 Key Industry Trends

5 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market

• 5.1 Market Overview
• 5.2 Market Performance
• 5.3 Impact of COVID-19
• 5.4 Market Forecast

6 Market Breakup by Product

• 6.1 Closure Device
  • 6.1.1 Market Trends
  • 6.1.2 Key Segments
    • 6.1.2.1 Plates and Screws
    • 6.1.2.2 Wires
    • 6.1.2.3 Clips and Pins
    • 6.1.2.4 Rods and Nails
    • 6.1.2.5 Cables
  • 6.1.3 Market Forecast
• 6.2 Bone Cement
  • 6.2.1 Market Trends
  • 6.2.2 Market Forecast

7 Market Breakup by Material

• 7.1 Stainless Steel
  • 7.1.1 Market Trends
  • 7.1.2 Market Forecast
• 7.2 Nitinol
  • 7.2.1 Market Trends
  • 7.2.2 Market Forecast
• 7.3 Titanium
  • 7.3.1 Market Trends
  • 7.3.2 Market Forecast
• 7.4 Tritium
  • 7.4.1 Market Trends
  • 7.4.2 Market Forecast
• 7.5 Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)
  • 7.5.1 Market Trends
  • 7.5.2 Market Forecast

8 Market Breakup by End User

• 8.1 Hospitals
  • 8.1.1 Market Trends
  • 8.1.2 Market Forecast
• 8.2 Orthopedic Surgical Centers
  • 8.2.1 Market Trends
  • 8.2.2 Market Forecast
• 8.3 Trauma Centers
  • 8.3.1 Market Trends
  • 8.3.2 Market Forecast
• 8.4 Ambulatory Centers
  • 8.4.1 Market Trends
  • 8.4.2 Market Forecast

9 Market Breakup by Region

• 9.1 North America
  • 9.1.1 United States
    • 9.1.1.1 Market Trends
    • 9.1.1.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.1.2 Canada
    • 9.1.2.1 Market Trends
    • 9.1.2.2 Market Forecast
• 9.2 Asia-Pacific
  • 9.2.1 China
    • 9.2.1.1 Market Trends
    • 9.2.1.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.2.2 Japan
    • 9.2.2.1 Market Trends
    • 9.2.2.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.2.3 India
    • 9.2.3.1 Market Trends
    • 9.2.3.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.2.4 South Korea
    • 9.2.4.1 Market Trends
    • 9.2.4.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.2.5 Australia
    • 9.2.5.1 Market Trends
    • 9.2.5.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.2.6 Indonesia
    • 9.2.6.1 Market Trends
    • 9.2.6.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.2.7 Others
    • 9.2.7.1 Market Trends
    • 9.2.7.2 Market Forecast
• 9.3 Europe
  • 9.3.1 Germany
    • 9.3.1.1 Market Trends
    • 9.3.1.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.3.2 France
    • 9.3.2.1 Market Trends
    • 9.3.2.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.3.3 United Kingdom
    • 9.3.3.1 Market Trends
    • 9.3.3.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.3.4 Italy
    • 9.3.4.1 Market Trends
    • 9.3.4.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.3.5 Spain
    • 9.3.5.1 Market Trends
    • 9.3.5.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.3.6 Russia
    • 9.3.6.1 Market Trends
    • 9.3.6.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.3.7 Others
    • 9.3.7.1 Market Trends
    • 9.3.7.2 Market Forecast
• 9.4 Latin America
  • 9.4.1 Brazil
    • 9.4.1.1 Market Trends
    • 9.4.1.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.4.2 Mexico
    • 9.4.2.1 Market Trends
    • 9.4.2.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.4.3 Others
    • 9.4.3.1 Market Trends
    • 9.4.3.2 Market Forecast
• 9.5 Middle East and Africa
  • 9.5.1 Market Trends
  • 9.5.2 Market Breakup by Country
  • 9.5.3 Market Forecast

10 SWOT Analysis

• 10.1 Overview
• 10.2 Strengths
• 10.3 Weaknesses
• 10.4 Opportunities
• 10.5 Threats

11 Value Chain Analysis

12 Porters Five Forces Analysis

• 12.1 Overview
• 12.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
• 12.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
• 12.4 Degree of Competition
• 12.5 Threat of New Entrants
• 12.6 Threat of Substitutes

13 Price Analysis

14 Competitive Landscape

• 14.1 Market Structure
• 14.2 Key Players
• 14.3 Profiles of Key Players
  • 14.3.1 Arthrex Inc.
    • 14.3.1.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.1.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.1.3 SWOT Analysis
  • 14.3.2 B. Braun Melsungen AG
    • 14.3.2.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.2.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.2.3 SWOT Analysis
  • 14.3.3 Globus Medical Inc.
    • 14.3.3.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.3.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.3.3 Financials
    • 14.3.3.4 SWOT Analysis
  • 14.3.4 Johnson & Johnson Private Limited
    • 14.3.4.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.4.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.4.3 Financials
    • 14.3.4.4 SWOT Analysis
  • 14.3.5 Medartis AG
    • 14.3.5.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.5.2 Product Portfolio
  • 14.3.6 Orthofix Medical Inc.
    • 14.3.6.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.6.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.6.3 Financials
    • 14.3.6.4 SWOT Analysis
  • 14.3.7 Orthopaedic Implant Company
    • 14.3.7.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.7.2 Product Portfolio
  • 14.3.8 OsteoMed (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.)
    • 14.3.8.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.8.2 Product Portfolio
  • 14.3.9 Smith & Nephew plc
    • 14.3.9.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.9.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.9.3 Financials
    • 14.3.9.4 SWOT Analysis
  • 14.3.10 Stryker Corporation
    • 14.3.10.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.10.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.10.3 Financials
    • 14.3.10.4 SWOT Analysis
  • 14.3.11 Zimmer Biomet
    • 14.3.11.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.11.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.11.3 Financials
    • 14.3.11.4 SWOT Analysis