½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1607257

¼¼°èÀÇ ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°, ¿ëµµº° ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market by Type (Medical Simulators, Surgical Robotics), End-Use (Academic & Research Institutions, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Hospitals) - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 193 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀåÀº 2023³â 5,121¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 2024³â¿¡´Â 5,892¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÇ¸ç, CAGR 16.50%·Î ¼ºÀåÇϸç 2030³â¿¡´Â 1¾ï 4,921¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹éÀº ÀÇ·á óġ Áß ÇÝÆ½À» ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÇϰí, Á¤È®¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̰í, º¸´Ù Çö½ÇÀûÀ̰í Á¦¾îµÈ ¼ö¼ú °æÇèÀ» Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÇÝÆ½ ¹× Èû Çǵå¹é ±â¼úÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ³·Àº ħ½À ¼ö¼ú ¼ö¿ä¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, °Å±â¿¡¼­ Ã˰¢Àº ¿ø°Ý °ø±¸ÀÇ »ç¿ë¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¼Õ½ÇµÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹½À´Ï´Ù. ¹üÀ§´Â ·Îº¿ Áö¿ø ¼ö¼ú, ÀÇÇлýÀ» À§ÇÑ ÈÆ·Ã¿ë ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ, ¿Ü°úÀǰ¡ ¿ø°Ý Á¶ÀÛÇÏ´Â ¿ø°Ý ¼ö¼ú¿¡ À̸¨´Ï´Ù. ÃÖÁ¾ ¿ëµµ´Â º´¿ø, ¼ö¼ú¼¾ÅÍ, ÈÆ·Ã ȯ°æÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ´Â Çмú ±â°ü µî ´Ù¾çÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î´Â ±â¼úÀÇ Áøº¸, ·Îº¿ Áö¿ø ¼ö¼úÀÇ ¼ö¿ë È®´ë, ¼÷·ÃµÈ ¼ö¼ú Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡ µîÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ³ôÀº ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ °³Ã´¿¡ ºñÁî´Ï½º ±âȸ°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÃÖ÷´Ü ±â¼ú°ú ¿¹»ê Á¦¾à »çÀÌÀÇ ÇöÀç °ÝÂ÷¸¦ ä¿ì´Â °ÍÀº ÀáÀçÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå ±â¾÷¿¡°Ô °ß°íÇÑ ÁøÀÔ Á¡À» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÅëÇÕ, ¼ö¼ú ½Ç¼ö·Î À̾îÁö´Â ±â°è ±â°èÀû °íÀå°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ÀáÀçÀû À§Çè µîÀÇ Á¦¾àÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹«¼± ÇÝÆ½ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ °³¹ß°ú Àΰ£ÀÇ ¼Õ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÅÍÄ¡¿¡ ÇÊÀûÇÏ´Â Èû Á¤¹ÐµµÀÇ Çâ»óÀ» µé ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ´ë±â ½Ã°£°ú ÀÀ´ä ½Ã°£ÀÇ °³¼±¿¡ °üÇÑ Á¶»ç´Â ¸®¾óŸÀÓ Á¶ÀÛÀ» À§Çؼ­ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ´õ¿í °³·®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ½ÃÀåÀÇ º»ÁúÀº ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÌ°í °æÀïÀûÀ̰í Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ R&D°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁسâ(2023) 5,121¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤³â(2024) 5,892¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø³â(2030) 1¾ï 4,921¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 16.50%

½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ: ºü¸£°Ô ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼úȯ°æ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ® °ø°³

ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼úȯ°æ½ÃÀåÀº ¼ö¿ä ¹× °ø±ÞÀÇ ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÎ »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ë¿¡ ÀÇÇØ º¯¸ð¸¦ ÀÌ·ç°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¤±³È­ ¹× »õ·Î¿î ºñÁî´Ï½º ±âȸ ȹµæ¿¡ ´ëºñ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ µ¿ÇâÀ» Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷Àº Á¤Ä¡Àû, Áö¸®Àû, ±â¼úÀû, »çȸÀû, °æÁ¦Àû ¿µ¿ª¿¡ °ÉÄ£ ´Ù¾çÇÑ À§ÇèÀ» ¿ÏÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¼Òºñ ÀÚ Çൿ°ú ±×°ÍÀÌ Á¦Á¶ ºñ¿ë°ú ±¸¸Å µ¿Çâ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ´õ¿í ¸íÈ®ÇÏ°Ô ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

  • ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
    • ¼ö¼ú½ÃÀÇ Á¤¹Ðµµ Çâ»ó ¿ä±¸ Áõ°¡
    • ÀÇ·á Á¾»çÀÚÀÇ Æ®·¹ÀÌ´×À̳ª ½ºÅ³ °³¹ß¿¡ÀÇ È°¿ë
    • ȯÀÚÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÌ°í ¼ö¼ú °á°ú¸¦ °³¼±ÇÒ Çʿ伺
  • ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
    • °íºñ¿ë°ú ÇÑÁ¤µÈ Ã˰¢ Ãæ½Çµµ
  • ½ÃÀå ±âȸ
    • ¿ø°Ý ÀÇ·á¿Í ¿ø°Ý ¼ö¼úÀÇ ÀαⰡ Áõ°¡
    • ¸ÂÃãÇü Ã˰¢ ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ °³¹ß
  • ½ÃÀåÀÇ °úÁ¦
    • µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸¾È ¿ì·Á¿Í »óÈ£ ¿î¿ë¼º ¹®Á¦

Porter's Five Force : ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀåÀ» Ž»öÇÏ´Â Àü·« µµ±¸

Porter's Five Force Framework´Â ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀå °æÀï ±¸µµ¸¦ ÀÌÇØÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ µµ±¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©´Â ±â¾÷ÀÌ ½ÃÀå ³» ¼¼·Âµµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°í ½Å±Ô »ç¾÷ÀÇ ¼öÀͼºÀ» ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µË´Ï´Ù. °úÁ¦¸¦ ÇÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ´õ¿í °­ÀÎÇÑ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ Æ÷Áö¼Å´×À» È®º¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

PESTLE ºÐ¼® : ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ¿ÜºÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ÆÄ¾Ç

¿ÜºÎ °Å½ÃÀû ȯ°æ ¿äÀÎÀº ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼º°ú ¿ªÇÐÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â µ¥ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ»ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. PESTLE ¿äÀÎÀ» Á¶»çÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷Àº ÀáÀçÀûÀÎ À§Çè°ú ±âȸ¸¦ ´õ Àß ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¾ÕÀ» ³»´Ùº¸°í Àû±ØÀûÀÎ ÀÇ»ç °áÁ¤À» ÇÒ Áغñ°¡ µË´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼® : ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °æÀï ±¸µµ ÆÄ¾Ç

ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀåÀÇ »ó¼¼ÇÑ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ °ø±Þ¾÷üÀÇ ¼º°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Æ÷Áö¼Å´Ï À̸¦ ÅëÇØ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁýÁß, ´ÜÆíÈ­, ÅëÇÕÀÇ µ¿ÇâÀ» ¹àÇô³»°í, º¥´õ´Â °æÀïÀÌ °ÝÈ­ÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥ ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ ÁöÀ§¸¦ ³ôÀÌ´Â Àü·«Àû ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» Çϱâ À§Çؼ­ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ Áö½ÄÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º : ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °ø±Þ¾÷üÀÇ ¼º´É Æò°¡

FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º´Â ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ º¥´õ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ µµ±¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Á¤º¸¸¦ ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ÀÇ»ç °áÁ¤À» ³»¸± ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ³× °¡Áö »çºÐ¸éÀ» ÅëÇØ º¥´õ¸¦ ¸íÈ®Çϰí Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ºÐ·ùÇϰí Àü·« ¸ñÇ¥¿¡ °¡Àå ÀûÇÕÇÑ ÆÄÆ®³Ê ¹× ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Àü·« ºÐ¼® ¹× ±ÇÀå : ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ¼º°ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±æÀ» ±×¸³´Ï´Ù.

ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼úȯ°æ½ÃÀåÀÇ Àü·«ºÐ¼®Àº ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÇÁ·¹Á𽺠°­È­¸¦ ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÏ´Â ±â¾÷¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Á¢±Ù¹ýÀ» ÅëÇØ °æÀï ±¸µµ¿¡¼­ °úÁ¦¸¦ ±Øº¹ÇÏ°í »õ·Î¿î ºñÁî´Ï½º ±âȸ¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© Àå±âÀûÀÎ ¼º°øÀ» °ÅµÑ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ±¸ÃàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â ÁÖ¿ä °ü½É ºÐ¾ß¸¦ Æ÷°ýÇÏ´Â ½ÃÀåÀÇ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ºÐ¼®À» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

1. ½ÃÀå ħÅõ: ÇöÀç ½ÃÀå ȯ°æÀÇ »ó¼¼ÇÑ °ËÅä, ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ, ½ÃÀå µµ´Þ¹üÀ§ ¹× Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâ·Â Æò°¡.

2. ½ÃÀå °³Ã´µµ: ½ÅÈï ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀå ±âȸ¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ°í ±âÁ¸ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ È®Àå °¡´É¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¸ç ¹Ì·¡ ¼ºÀåÀ» À§ÇÑ Àü·«Àû ·Îµå¸ÊÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

3. ½ÃÀå ´Ù¾çÈ­: ÃÖ±Ù Á¦Ç° Ãâ½Ã, ¹Ì°³Ã´ Áö¿ª, ¾÷°èÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä Áøº¸, ½ÃÀåÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â Àü·«Àû ÅõÀÚ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

4. °æÀï Æò°¡ ¹× Á¤º¸ : °æÀï ±¸µµ¸¦ öÀúÈ÷ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À², »ç¾÷ Àü·«, Á¦Ç° Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À, ÀÎÁõ, ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹ ½ÂÀÎ, ƯÇã µ¿Çâ, ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼ú Áøº¸ µîÀ» °ËÁõÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

5. Á¦Ç° °³¹ß ¹× Çõ½Å : ¹Ì·¡ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» °¡¼ÓÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÇ´Â ÃÖ÷´Ü ±â¼ú, R&D Ȱµ¿, Á¦Ç° Çõ½ÅÀ» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ°¡ ÃæºÐÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ ¾ò°í ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Áß¿äÇÑ Áú¹®¿¡ ´ë´äÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

1. ÇöÀç ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿Í ÇâÈÄ ¼ºÀå ¿¹ÃøÀº?

2. ÃÖ°íÀÇ ÅõÀÚ ±âȸ¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â Á¦Ç°, ºÎ¹® ¹× Áö¿ªÀº ¾îµðÀԴϱî?

3. ½ÃÀåÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä ±â¼ú µ¿Çâ°ú ±ÔÁ¦ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀº?

4. ÁÖ¿ä º¥´õÀÇ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²°ú °æÀï Æ÷Áö¼ÇÀº?

5. º¥´õ ½ÃÀå ÁøÀÔ¡¤Ã¶¼ö Àü·«ÀÇ ¿øµ¿·ÂÀÌ µÇ´Â ¼öÀÍ¿ø°ú Àü·«Àû ±âȸ´Â ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
      • ¼ö¼úÀÇ Á¤¹Ðµµ Çâ»óÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁø´Ù
      • ÀÇ·á Á¾»çÀÚÀÇ ¿¬¼ö¡¤½ºÅ³ °³¹ß¿¡ÀÇ È°¿ë
      • ȯÀÚÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÌ°í ¼ö¼ú °á°ú¸¦ °³¼±ÇÒ Çʿ伺
    • ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
      • ºñ¿ëÀÌ ³ô°í, Ã˰¢ÀÇ Ãæ½Çµµ°¡ ÇÑÁ¤µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù
    • ±âȸ
      • ¿ø°Ý ÀÇ·á¿Í ¿ø°Ý ¼ö¼úÀÇ ÀαⰡ Áõ°¡
      • ¸ÂÃãÇü Ã˰¢ ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ °³¹ß
    • °úÁ¦
      • µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸¾È ¿ì·Á¿Í »óÈ£ ¿î¿ë¼º ¹®Á¦
  • ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®
  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®
    • Á¤Ä¡
    • °æÁ¦
    • »çȸ
    • ±â¼ú
    • ¹ý·ü
    • ȯ°æ

Á¦6Àå ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼úȯ°æ ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°

  • ÀÇ·á ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌÅÍ
  • ¿Ü°ú¿ë ·Îº¿

Á¦7Àå ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾ ¿ëµµº°

  • Çмú±â°ü ¹× ¿¬±¸±â°ü
  • ¿Ü·¡¼ö¼ú¼¾ÅÍ(ASC)
  • º´¿ø

Á¦8Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä« ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼úȯ°æ½ÃÀå

  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ¹Ì±¹

Á¦9Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼ú ȯ°æ ½ÃÀå

  • È£ÁÖ
  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀϺ»
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • Çѱ¹
  • ´ë¸¸
  • ű¹
  • º£Æ®³²

Á¦10Àå À¯·´¡¤Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ÇÝÆ½ Çǵå¹é ¼ö¼úȯ°æ ½ÃÀå

  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Çɶõµå
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ½ºÀ§½º
  • ÅÍŰ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • ¿µ±¹

Á¦11Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼® 2023
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2023
  • °æÀï ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼®
  • Àü·« ºÐ¼®°ú Á¦¾È

±â¾÷ ¸ñ·Ï

  • 3D Systems Corporation
  • Brainlab AG
  • EchoPixel, Inc.
  • Force Dimension
  • Forsslund Systems AB
  • Haption SA
  • Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
  • Medrobotics Corporation
  • Medtronic plc
  • Moog, Inc.
  • Orb Surgical Ltd.
  • Siemens Healthineers AG
  • Smith & Nephew plc
  • Stryker Corporation
  • VirtaMed AG
  • Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
JHS 24.12.17

The Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market was valued at USD 51.21 million in 2023, expected to reach USD 58.92 million in 2024, and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 16.50%, to USD 149.21 million by 2030.

Haptic feedback in surgical environments involves the utilization of tactile and force feedback technology to simulate the sense of touch during medical procedures, enhancing precision and offering a more realistic and controlled surgical experience. The necessity of haptic feedback arises from the demand for minimally invasive surgeries, where tactile sensation is often lost due to the use of remote tools. Haptic technology enables surgeons to assess the softness or rigidity of tissues and navigate intricately around critical structures. Its application spans robotic-assisted surgeries, training simulators for medical students, and teleoperations where surgeons operate over distances. The end-use scope is vast, involving hospitals, surgical centers, and academic institutions leveraging training environments. Key factors influencing market growth include advancements in technology, increasing acceptance of robotic-assisted surgeries, and the rising demand for skilled surgical training. Opportunities lie in integrating AI with haptic solutions to enhance procedural accuracy and developing cost-effective devices to cater to price-sensitive markets. Bridging the current gap between cutting-edge technology and budgetary constraints offers a robust entry point for potential market players. Limitations include high initial costs, complex technical integration, and potential risks associated with mechanical failure leading to surgical errors. Moreover, varying healthcare infrastructure across regions poses a challenge for market penetration. Innovation areas beckon in the development of wireless haptic systems to improve mobility and portability, and the enhancement of force precision to match that of manual human touch. Research on improving latency and response time can further refine these systems for real-time operations. The nature of this market is dynamic and competitive, with ongoing advancements necessitating continuous research and development. Early investment in emerging technologies, partnerships with surgical device manufacturers, and customization of solutions to specific surgical requirements can ensure sustained business growth.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2023] USD 51.21 million
Estimated Year [2024] USD 58.92 million
Forecast Year [2030] USD 149.21 million
CAGR (%) 16.50%

Market Dynamics: Unveiling Key Market Insights in the Rapidly Evolving Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

The Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market is undergoing transformative changes driven by a dynamic interplay of supply and demand factors. Understanding these evolving market dynamics prepares business organizations to make informed investment decisions, refine strategic decisions, and seize new opportunities. By gaining a comprehensive view of these trends, business organizations can mitigate various risks across political, geographic, technical, social, and economic domains while also gaining a clearer understanding of consumer behavior and its impact on manufacturing costs and purchasing trends.

  • Market Drivers
    • Growing need to improve precision during surgeries
    • Utilization for training and skill development of medical professionals
    • Need to enhance patient safty and improve surgical outcome
  • Market Restraints
    • High cost and limited haptic fidelity
  • Market Opportunities
    • Emerging popularity of telemedicine and remote surgery
    • Ongoing development of customized haptic simulations
  • Market Challenges
    • Data security concerns and interoperability issues

Porter's Five Forces: A Strategic Tool for Navigating the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

Porter's five forces framework is a critical tool for understanding the competitive landscape of the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market. It offers business organizations with a clear methodology for evaluating their competitive positioning and exploring strategic opportunities. This framework helps businesses assess the power dynamics within the market and determine the profitability of new ventures. With these insights, business organizations can leverage their strengths, address weaknesses, and avoid potential challenges, ensuring a more resilient market positioning.

PESTLE Analysis: Navigating External Influences in the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

External macro-environmental factors play a pivotal role in shaping the performance dynamics of the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market. Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors analysis provides the necessary information to navigate these influences. By examining PESTLE factors, businesses can better understand potential risks and opportunities. This analysis enables business organizations to anticipate changes in regulations, consumer preferences, and economic trends, ensuring they are prepared to make proactive, forward-thinking decisions.

Market Share Analysis: Understanding the Competitive Landscape in the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

A detailed market share analysis in the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market provides a comprehensive assessment of vendors' performance. Companies can identify their competitive positioning by comparing key metrics, including revenue, customer base, and growth rates. This analysis highlights market concentration, fragmentation, and trends in consolidation, offering vendors the insights required to make strategic decisions that enhance their position in an increasingly competitive landscape.

FPNV Positioning Matrix: Evaluating Vendors' Performance in the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

The Forefront, Pathfinder, Niche, Vital (FPNV) Positioning Matrix is a critical tool for evaluating vendors within the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market. This matrix enables business organizations to make well-informed decisions that align with their goals by assessing vendors based on their business strategy and product satisfaction. The four quadrants provide a clear and precise segmentation of vendors, helping users identify the right partners and solutions that best fit their strategic objectives.

Strategy Analysis & Recommendation: Charting a Path to Success in the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

A strategic analysis of the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market is essential for businesses looking to strengthen their global market presence. By reviewing key resources, capabilities, and performance indicators, business organizations can identify growth opportunities and work toward improvement. This approach helps businesses navigate challenges in the competitive landscape and ensures they are well-positioned to capitalize on newer opportunities and drive long-term success.

Key Company Profiles

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include 3D Systems Corporation, Brainlab AG, EchoPixel, Inc., Force Dimension, Forsslund Systems AB, Haption S.A., Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Medrobotics Corporation, Medtronic plc, Moog, Inc., Orb Surgical Ltd., Siemens Healthineers AG, Smith & Nephew plc, Stryker Corporation, VirtaMed AG, and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc..

Market Segmentation & Coverage

This research report categorizes the Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-markets:

  • Based on Type, market is studied across Medical Simulators and Surgical Robotics.
  • Based on End-Use, market is studied across Academic & Research Institutions, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, and Hospitals.
  • Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

The report offers a comprehensive analysis of the market, covering key focus areas:

1. Market Penetration: A detailed review of the current market environment, including extensive data from top industry players, evaluating their market reach and overall influence.

2. Market Development: Identifies growth opportunities in emerging markets and assesses expansion potential in established sectors, providing a strategic roadmap for future growth.

3. Market Diversification: Analyzes recent product launches, untapped geographic regions, major industry advancements, and strategic investments reshaping the market.

4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: Provides a thorough analysis of the competitive landscape, examining market share, business strategies, product portfolios, certifications, regulatory approvals, patent trends, and technological advancements of key players.

5. Product Development & Innovation: Highlights cutting-edge technologies, R&D activities, and product innovations expected to drive future market growth.

The report also answers critical questions to aid stakeholders in making informed decisions:

1. What is the current market size, and what is the forecasted growth?

2. Which products, segments, and regions offer the best investment opportunities?

3. What are the key technology trends and regulatory influences shaping the market?

4. How do leading vendors rank in terms of market share and competitive positioning?

5. What revenue sources and strategic opportunities drive vendors' market entry or exit strategies?

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Market Dynamics
    • 5.1.1. Drivers
      • 5.1.1.1. Growing need to improve precision during surgeries
      • 5.1.1.2. Utilization for training and skill development of medical professionals
      • 5.1.1.3. Need to enhance patient safty and improve surgical outcome
    • 5.1.2. Restraints
      • 5.1.2.1. High cost and limited haptic fidelity
    • 5.1.3. Opportunities
      • 5.1.3.1. Emerging popularity of telemedicine and remote surgery
      • 5.1.3.2. Ongoing development of customized haptic simulations
    • 5.1.4. Challenges
      • 5.1.4.1. Data security concerns and interoperability issues
  • 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
  • 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
  • 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
    • 5.4.1. Political
    • 5.4.2. Economic
    • 5.4.3. Social
    • 5.4.4. Technological
    • 5.4.5. Legal
    • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market, by Type

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Medical Simulators
  • 6.3. Surgical Robotics

7. Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market, by End-Use

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Academic & Research Institutions
  • 7.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • 7.4. Hospitals

8. Americas Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Argentina
  • 8.3. Brazil
  • 8.4. Canada
  • 8.5. Mexico
  • 8.6. United States

9. Asia-Pacific Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Australia
  • 9.3. China
  • 9.4. India
  • 9.5. Indonesia
  • 9.6. Japan
  • 9.7. Malaysia
  • 9.8. Philippines
  • 9.9. Singapore
  • 9.10. South Korea
  • 9.11. Taiwan
  • 9.12. Thailand
  • 9.13. Vietnam

10. Europe, Middle East & Africa Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Denmark
  • 10.3. Egypt
  • 10.4. Finland
  • 10.5. France
  • 10.6. Germany
  • 10.7. Israel
  • 10.8. Italy
  • 10.9. Netherlands
  • 10.10. Nigeria
  • 10.11. Norway
  • 10.12. Poland
  • 10.13. Qatar
  • 10.14. Russia
  • 10.15. Saudi Arabia
  • 10.16. South Africa
  • 10.17. Spain
  • 10.18. Sweden
  • 10.19. Switzerland
  • 10.20. Turkey
  • 10.21. United Arab Emirates
  • 10.22. United Kingdom

11. Competitive Landscape

  • 11.1. Market Share Analysis, 2023
  • 11.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2023
  • 11.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
  • 11.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation

Companies Mentioned

  • 1. 3D Systems Corporation
  • 2. Brainlab AG
  • 3. EchoPixel, Inc.
  • 4. Force Dimension
  • 5. Forsslund Systems AB
  • 6. Haption S.A.
  • 7. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
  • 8. Medrobotics Corporation
  • 9. Medtronic plc
  • 10. Moog, Inc.
  • 11. Orb Surgical Ltd.
  • 12. Siemens Healthineers AG
  • 13. Smith & Nephew plc
  • 14. Stryker Corporation
  • 15. VirtaMed AG
  • 16. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦