세계의 구조 안전성 모니터링(SHM) 시장 : 제공별, 기술별, 모니터링 기법별, 업계별 - 예측(2025-2030년)

The Structural Health Monitoring Market was valued at USD 4.31 billion in 2023, expected to reach USD 4.83 billion in 2024, and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 12.64%, to USD 9.92 billion by 2030.

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) refers to the process of implementing a damage detection and characterization strategy for engineering structures such as bridges, buildings, and aircraft. The primary necessity of SHM lies in ensuring safety, improving maintenance efficiency, and extending the lifespan of structures. It is widely applied in infrastructure sectors, including transportation, aerospace, and energy, where it is essential to assess the integrity and reliability of structures. The end-use scope extends from government agencies responsible for public infrastructure to private enterprises managing large facilities. Market growth in SHM is influenced by technological advancements such as IoT and AI, growing investments in infrastructure development, and increasing catastrophic incidents related to structural failures. Opportunities abound in areas such as wireless sensor networks, real-time monitoring solutions, and predictive maintenance models, where adopting these technologies can significantly elevate SHM capabilities. Expanding smart city initiatives also provide potential for SHM solutions. However, challenges include the high cost of implementation, inadequate awareness, and lack of standardized protocols, which can hamper market growth. Additionally, complexities involved in accurately interpreting data and integrating various sensors into a cohesive monitoring system present limits. To capitalize on growth opportunities, companies should focus on innovations like self-powered sensors, advanced analytics, and scalable cloud-based SHM platforms. Collaborations with tech firms for integrating AI/machine learning could lead to breakthroughs in predictive analysis of structural issues. There is also considerable room for research in developing cost-effective solutions to make SHM accessible for low-budget projects. The overall SHM market is dynamic, evolving with technological progress, and holds promise for significant innovations that ensure structural safety and extend asset life. By overcoming existing challenges, businesses can leverage these opportunities for sustained growth and establish a strong foothold in this crucial sector.

Market Dynamics: Unveiling Key Market Insights in the Rapidly Evolving Structural Health Monitoring Market

The Structural Health Monitoring Market is undergoing transformative changes driven by a dynamic interplay of supply and demand factors. Understanding these evolving market dynamics prepares business organizations to make informed investment decisions, refine strategic decisions, and seize new opportunities. By gaining a comprehensive view of these trends, business organizations can mitigate various risks across political, geographic, technical, social, and economic domains while also gaining a clearer understanding of consumer behavior and its impact on manufacturing costs and purchasing trends.

• Market Drivers
  • Huge benefits associated with structural health monitoring
  • Investments in structural health monitoring across various countries worldwide
  • Aging infrastructure and government regulations about the sustainability of structures
• Market Restraints
  • Delayed response to the structural health monitoring in developing countries
• Market Opportunities
  • Public-private-partnerships for infrastructure development coupled with advancements in the field of sensor technology
  • Advent of technologically advanced solution for structural health monitoring
• Market Challenges
  • Complexity associated with large volumes of data processing and management

Porter's Five Forces: A Strategic Tool for Navigating the Structural Health Monitoring Market

Porter's five forces framework is a critical tool for understanding the competitive landscape of the Structural Health Monitoring Market. It offers business organizations with a clear methodology for evaluating their competitive positioning and exploring strategic opportunities. This framework helps businesses assess the power dynamics within the market and determine the profitability of new ventures. With these insights, business organizations can leverage their strengths, address weaknesses, and avoid potential challenges, ensuring a more resilient market positioning.

PESTLE Analysis: Navigating External Influences in the Structural Health Monitoring Market

External macro-environmental factors play a pivotal role in shaping the performance dynamics of the Structural Health Monitoring Market. Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors analysis provides the necessary information to navigate these influences. By examining PESTLE factors, businesses can better understand potential risks and opportunities. This analysis enables business organizations to anticipate changes in regulations, consumer preferences, and economic trends, ensuring they are prepared to make proactive, forward-thinking decisions.

Market Share Analysis: Understanding the Competitive Landscape in the Structural Health Monitoring Market

A detailed market share analysis in the Structural Health Monitoring Market provides a comprehensive assessment of vendors' performance. Companies can identify their competitive positioning by comparing key metrics, including revenue, customer base, and growth rates. This analysis highlights market concentration, fragmentation, and trends in consolidation, offering vendors the insights required to make strategic decisions that enhance their position in an increasingly competitive landscape.

FPNV Positioning Matrix: Evaluating Vendors' Performance in the Structural Health Monitoring Market

The Forefront, Pathfinder, Niche, Vital (FPNV) Positioning Matrix is a critical tool for evaluating vendors within the Structural Health Monitoring Market. This matrix enables business organizations to make well-informed decisions that align with their goals by assessing vendors based on their business strategy and product satisfaction. The four quadrants provide a clear and precise segmentation of vendors, helping users identify the right partners and solutions that best fit their strategic objectives.

Strategy Analysis & Recommendation: Charting a Path to Success in the Structural Health Monitoring Market

A strategic analysis of the Structural Health Monitoring Market is essential for businesses looking to strengthen their global market presence. By reviewing key resources, capabilities, and performance indicators, business organizations can identify growth opportunities and work toward improvement. This approach helps businesses navigate challenges in the competitive landscape and ensures they are well-positioned to capitalize on newer opportunities and drive long-term success.

Key Company Profiles

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Structural Health Monitoring Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Acellent Technologies Inc., AVT Reliability Ltd., Beanair GmbH, Bridge Diagnostics, Campbell Scientific, Inc., COWI A/S, Digitexx Data Systems, Inc., ElastiSense, FEAC Engineering P.C., First Sensor AG by TE Connectivity Ltd., Geocomp, Inc., Geokon, Geomotion (Singapore) Pte Ltd., Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer GmbH, ignaGuard, LLC, Infibra Technologies Srl, James Fisher and Sons PLC, KDM Engineers [India] Pvt. Ltd., Kinemetrics, Inc., Nova Ventures Group Corp., Rst Instruments Ltd., Sensuron LLC, Setpoint Technologies Ltd., SGS S.A., SHM Canada Consulting Limited, Sisgeo Srl, SITES AFLA (Pty) Ltd., Sixense Group, Sodis Lab, Somni Solutions, and Xylem Inc..

Market Segmentation & Coverage

This research report categorizes the Structural Health Monitoring Market to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-markets:

• Based on Offering, market is studied across Hardware, Services, and Software. The Hardware is further studied across Sensors. The Sensors is further studied across Accelerometers, Corrosion Sensors, Displacement Sensors, Inclinometers and Tiltmeters, Strain Gauges, and Temperature Sensors. The Services is further studied across Post-Installation and Pre-Installation.
• Based on Technology, market is studied across Wired Structural Health Monitoring and Wireless Structural Health Monitoring.
• Based on Monitoring Approach, market is studied across Active Monitoring and Passive Monitoring.
• Based on Vertical, market is studied across Aerospace & Defence, Civil Infrastructure, Energy, and Mining.
• Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

The report offers a comprehensive analysis of the market, covering key focus areas:

1. Market Penetration: A detailed review of the current market environment, including extensive data from top industry players, evaluating their market reach and overall influence.

2. Market Development: Identifies growth opportunities in emerging markets and assesses expansion potential in established sectors, providing a strategic roadmap for future growth.

3. Market Diversification: Analyzes recent product launches, untapped geographic regions, major industry advancements, and strategic investments reshaping the market.

4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: Provides a thorough analysis of the competitive landscape, examining market share, business strategies, product portfolios, certifications, regulatory approvals, patent trends, and technological advancements of key players.

5. Product Development & Innovation: Highlights cutting-edge technologies, R&D activities, and product innovations expected to drive future market growth.

The report also answers critical questions to aid stakeholders in making informed decisions:

1. What is the current market size, and what is the forecasted growth?

2. Which products, segments, and regions offer the best investment opportunities?

3. What are the key technology trends and regulatory influences shaping the market?

4. How do leading vendors rank in terms of market share and competitive positioning?

5. What revenue sources and strategic opportunities drive vendors' market entry or exit strategies?

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Define: Research Objective
• 2.2. Determine: Research Design
• 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
• 2.4. Collect: Data Source
• 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
• 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
• 2.7. Publish: Research Report
• 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Market Dynamics
  • 5.1.1. Drivers
    • 5.1.1.1. Huge benefits associated with structural health monitoring
    • 5.1.1.2. Investments in structural health monitoring across various countries worldwide
    • 5.1.1.3. Aging infrastructure and government regulations about the sustainability of structures
  • 5.1.2. Restraints
    • 5.1.2.1. Delayed response to the structural health monitoring in developing countries
  • 5.1.3. Opportunities
    • 5.1.3.1. Public-private-partnerships for infrastructure development coupled with advancements in the field of sensor technology
    • 5.1.3.2. Advent of technologically advanced solution for structural health monitoring
  • 5.1.4. Challenges
    • 5.1.4.1. Complexity associated with large volumes of data processing and management
• 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
  • 5.2.1. Component: Need of highly advanced component for the real time monitoring of structural health refining predictive maintenance analytics
  • 5.2.2. Technology: Preference for wireless structural health systems for quick deployment or reconfiguration of more secure monitoring systems
  • 5.2.3. Vertical: Expandable utilization in aerospace and defense of structural health monitoring for minimal interference with the operational capabilities
• 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
  • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
  • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
  • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
• 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 5.4.1. Political
  • 5.4.2. Economic
  • 5.4.3. Social
  • 5.4.4. Technological
  • 5.4.5. Legal
  • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Offering

• 6.1. Introduction
• 6.2. Hardware
  • 6.2.1. Sensors
    • 6.2.1.1. Accelerometers
    • 6.2.1.2. Corrosion Sensors
    • 6.2.1.3. Displacement Sensors
    • 6.2.1.4. Inclinometers and Tiltmeters
    • 6.2.1.5. Strain Gauges
    • 6.2.1.6. Temperature Sensors
• 6.3. Services
  • 6.3.1. Post-Installation
  • 6.3.2. Pre-Installation
• 6.4. Software

7. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Technology

• 7.1. Introduction
• 7.2. Wired Structural Health Monitoring
• 7.3. Wireless Structural Health Monitoring

8. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Monitoring Approach

• 8.1. Introduction
• 8.2. Active Monitoring
• 8.3. Passive Monitoring

9. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Vertical

• 9.1. Introduction
• 9.2. Aerospace & Defence
• 9.3. Civil Infrastructure
• 9.4. Energy
• 9.5. Mining

10. Americas Structural Health Monitoring Market

• 10.1. Introduction
• 10.2. Argentina
• 10.3. Brazil
• 10.4. Canada
• 10.5. Mexico
• 10.6. United States

11. Asia-Pacific Structural Health Monitoring Market

• 11.1. Introduction
• 11.2. Australia
• 11.3. China
• 11.4. India
• 11.5. Indonesia
• 11.6. Japan
• 11.7. Malaysia
• 11.8. Philippines
• 11.9. Singapore
• 11.10. South Korea
• 11.11. Taiwan
• 11.12. Thailand
• 11.13. Vietnam

12. Europe, Middle East & Africa Structural Health Monitoring Market

• 12.1. Introduction
• 12.2. Denmark
• 12.3. Egypt
• 12.4. Finland
• 12.5. France
• 12.6. Germany
• 12.7. Israel
• 12.8. Italy
• 12.9. Netherlands
• 12.10. Nigeria
• 12.11. Norway
• 12.12. Poland
• 12.13. Qatar
• 12.14. Russia
• 12.15. Saudi Arabia
• 12.16. South Africa
• 12.17. Spain
• 12.18. Sweden
• 12.19. Switzerland
• 12.20. Turkey
• 12.21. United Arab Emirates
• 12.22. United Kingdom

13. Competitive Landscape

• 13.1. Market Share Analysis, 2023
• 13.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2023
• 13.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
  • 13.3.1. Arahas Unveils Groundbreaking Structural Health Monitoring and Early Warning Technology for Earthquake-Prone Regions in the Indian Subcontinent
  • 13.3.2. ABS Launches Offshore Structural Health Monitoring Notation
  • 13.3.3. Akselos, Yinson and Enauta Sign a Multi-Year Deal in Brazil to Deploy Real-Time Structural Health Monitoring for Atlanta FPSO
• 13.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation

Companies Mentioned

• 1. Acellent Technologies Inc.
• 2. AVT Reliability Ltd.
• 3. Beanair GmbH
• 4. Bridge Diagnostics
• 5. Campbell Scientific, Inc.
• 6. COWI A/S
• 7. Digitexx Data Systems, Inc.
• 8. ElastiSense
• 9. FEAC Engineering P.C.
• 10. First Sensor AG by TE Connectivity Ltd.
• 11. Geocomp, Inc.
• 12. Geokon
• 13. Geomotion (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
• 14. Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer GmbH
• 15. ignaGuard, LLC
• 16. Infibra Technologies Srl
• 17. James Fisher and Sons PLC
• 18. KDM Engineers [India] Pvt. Ltd.
• 19. Kinemetrics, Inc.
• 20. Nova Ventures Group Corp.
• 21. Rst Instruments Ltd.
• 22. Sensuron LLC
• 23. Setpoint Technologies Ltd.
• 24. SGS S.A.
• 25. SHM Canada Consulting Limited
• 26. Sisgeo Srl
• 27. SITES AFLA (Pty) Ltd.
• 28. Sixense Group
• 29. Sodis Lab
• 30. Somni Solutions
• 31. Xylem Inc.