½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1676777

¼¼°èÀÇ ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå : ÀÌ¿ë ±â¼úº°, ¼öÀÍ ¸ðµ¨º°, ¹èÆ÷ ¸ðµ¨º°, Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°, ¾÷°èº°, ¿ëµµº°(2025-2030³â)

Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market by Technology Utilization, Revenue Models, Deployment Model, Organization Size, Vertical, Application Areas - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 197 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â 38¾ï 2,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç 2025³â¿¡´Â 43¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ¿¬Æò±Õ 14.61% ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 86¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ(2024³â) 38¾ï 2,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ(2025³â) 43¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ(2030³â) 86¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR 14.61%

ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀº ±â¼ú, Çõ½Å, ¿î¿µ È¿À²¼ºÀÇ Àü·«Àû À¶ÇÕÀ» ³ªÅ¸³À´Ï´Ù. ¿À´Ã³¯ÀÇ µðÁöÅÐ ½Ã´ë¿¡´Â ó¸® ¸®¼Ò½º¸¦ ÇÒ´çÇÏ°í ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼Òºñ¸¦ ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÏ¸ç ¿î¿µ ¿¬¼Ó¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ ¾Ë°í¸®Áò ±â¹Ý ÀÇ»ç °áÁ¤¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ´Â »ê¾÷ÀÌ Á¡Á¡ ´õ ¸¹¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ÀÔ¹® °³¿ä¿¡¼­´Â »õ·Î¿î ±â¼ú°ú º¯È­ÇÏ´Â ºñÁî´Ï½º ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ´Â ½ÃÀåÀ» Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î »ìÆìº¾´Ï´Ù.

ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ÀÎÅÚ¸®Àü½º¿Í ½Ç½Ã°£ ºÐ¼®À» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ´Â ÃÖ÷´Ü ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀ¸·Î ¿î¿µ ¹æ½ÄÀ» ÀüȯÇÏ°Ô µÈ ¿äÀÎÀ» »ìÆìº¸´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿©Á¤À» ½ÃÀÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº »ý»ê¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½Ãų »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó º¸´Ù ¸íÈ®ÇÑ °æÀï ¿ìÀ§¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µÀÇ ÇÙ½É ¿ªÇÒÀº ÀÏ»óÀûÀÎ ¾÷¹«¸¦ Àü·«Àû ¼º°ú Çâ»óÀÇ ±âȸ·Î ÀüȯÇÏ´Â ´É·ÂÀ¸·Î ´õ¿í °­Á¶µË´Ï´Ù.

°Ô´Ù°¡ ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå »óȲ¿¡ Á÷¸éÇÑ ¹Îø¼º°ú ´ëÀÀ·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ä±¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ±â¾÷µéÀº ÀÎÇÁ¶ó ÅõÀÚ¸¦ ÀçÆò°¡ÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. µ¥ÀÌÅÍÀÇ ¾çÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ¿î¿µ ¿ä±¸°¡ º¹ÀâÇØÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ±â¾÷µéÀº ±â¼ú°ú È¿À²¼ºÀ» °áÇÕÇÑ Á¤±³ÇÑ Ç÷§ÆûÀ¸·Î ´«À» µ¹¸®°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­´Â ºñ¿ë È¿À²ÀûÀÎ ¿î¿µÀ» À¯ÁöÇϸ鼭 ºü¸¥ ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀ» ¼ö¿ëÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Ã˹ߵǾú½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌó·³ ÁøÈ­Çϴ ȯ°æ¿¡¼­´Â ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» µÞ¹ÞħÇÏ´Â ±Ùº»ÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå µ¿ÀÎ, ±â¼úÀû ¿øµ¿·Â, ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â °æÁ¦ ¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌÇØÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇØÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¼Ò°³´Â ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼¼ºÐÈ­, Áö¿ªº° ºÐÆ÷, ÁÖ¿ä ¾÷°è ±â¾÷, ÇâÈÄ ¼º°øÀ» À§ÇÑ ½ÇÇà °¡´ÉÇÑ Àü·«¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÉÃþ ºÐ¼®ÀÇ ¹ßÆÇÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå º¯È­

ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ȯ°æÀº ÆÄ±«ÀûÀÎ ±â¼úÀÇ À¶ÇÕ°ú ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ºñÁî´Ï½º ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ º¯È­¸¦ °Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Àΰø Áö´É°ú ¸Ó½Å ·¯´×ÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Ç÷§ÆûÀº ¿¹Ãø·Â°ú ÀûÀÀ·ÂÀÌ Çâ»óµÇ¾î ¿î¿µ È¿À²¼ºÀÌ Å©°Ô °³¼±µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. »ç¹° ÀÎÅͳÝÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ÅëÇÕ°ú ÇÔ²² ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¹üÀ§¿Í ±â´ÉÀº ÀÌÁ¦ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µÀ» ÈξÀ ¶Ù¾î³Ñ¾î ½Ç½Ã°£ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®À¸·Î Áï°¢ÀûÀÎ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» ³»¸®´Â ¿µ¿ªÀ¸·Î È®ÀåµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌÁ¦ Á¶Á÷Àº Ä¡¿­ÇÑ °æÀï°ú ±Þº¯ÇÏ´Â ±â¼ú Ç¥ÁØÀ¸·Î Ư¡Áö¾îÁö´Â ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀΠȯ°æ¿¡ Á÷¸éÇØ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ¸¹Àº ±â¾÷ÀÌ Á¤ÀûÀÌ°í °æÁ÷µÈ ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡¼­ ¸®¼Ò½º ÇÒ´ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Çâ»óµÈ °¡½Ã¼ºÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â À¯¿¬Çϰí È®Àå °¡´ÉÇÑ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ¸·Î ÀüȯÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¼Ö·ç¼Ç°ú ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º ÀÎÇÁ¶ó ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀº ÆÄ¿öÀ» ±Ø´ëÈ­ÇÏ´Â µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¹Î°¨ÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ ¾ÈÀüÇÏ°Ô °ü¸®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¸ðµ¨À» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

±â¾÷ÀÌ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ¾Ë°í¸®Áò°ú »óÈ£ ¿¬°áµÈ µð¹ÙÀ̽ºÀÇ ÈûÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ºñ¿ë È¿À²ÀûÀÏ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇϰí ȯ°æÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» ¼±È£ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ¶Ñ·ÇÇØÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½ÃÀåÀº ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÀÚº» ÁöÃ⠸𵨿¡¼­ Á¾·®Á¦ ¶Ç´Â ±¸µ¶ ±â¹Ý ¼öÀÍ ¸ðµ¨°ú °°Àº º¸´Ù À¯¿¬ÇÑ ¿î¿µ ºñ¿ë ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©·Î Á¡ÁøÀûÀ¸·Î ÀüȯÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­´Â Àå±âÀûÀÎ ¼ºÀåÀ» À§ÇØ ±â¼ú ÅõÀÚÀÇ °¡Ä¡¿Í ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¸¦ Á¤Çϰí ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÏ´Â ¹æ½Ä¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ À籸»óÀ» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­´Â ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ¸®¼Ò½º°¡ ¹ÎÁÖÈ­µÇ°í Çʿ信 µû¶ó »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ½Ã´ë¸¦ ¿­¾î Á¶Á÷ ¿î¿µÀÇ ¸ðµç Ãø¸éÀÌ Áö´ÉÀûÀ̰í È¿À²ÀûÀÎ ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Áö¿øµÇµµ·Ï º¸ÀåÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ´ÙÀ½ ¼½¼Ç¿¡¼­´Â ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­, Áö¿ªº° ¿ªÇаü°è, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­¸¦ ÁÖµµÇÏ´Â ÇÙ½É ¾÷°è ±â¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÀÚ¼¼È÷ »ìÆìº¾´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀ» ÁÖµµÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä ¼¼ºÐÈ­ÀÇ ÅëÂû·Â

½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÉÃþ Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ µ¿Àΰú ±âȸ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ È¯°æÀº ¿©·¯ Â÷¿øÀ» ÅëÇØ ºÐ¼®µÇ¸ç, °¢°¢ ½ÅÈï ±â¼úÀÇ È°¿ë°ú ¾÷°èÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÀ¯ÇÑ °üÁ¡À» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ¿ë ±â¼úÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ ½ÃÀåÀº ÀΰøÁö´É°ú »ç¹° ÀÎÅͳݿ¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÐ ºÎ¹®À¸·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­µÇ¸ç, ÀΰøÁö´É ¿µ¿ªÀº µö·¯´×°ú ¸Ó½Å·¯´×°ú °°Àº Àü¹® ºÐ¾ß·Î ´õ¿í ¼¼ºÐÈ­µË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ ºÐ·ù´Â ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀÌ ¸®¼Ò½º È¿À²¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇØ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ºÎÇϸ¦ ÇнÀÇÏ°í ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ÀÛ¾÷À» ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î °í±Þ °è»ê ¹æ¹ýÀÇ Á߿伺À» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¼öÀÍ ¸ðµ¨Àº Á¾·®Á¦ Àü·«°ú ±¸µ¶ ±â¹Ý Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¸ðµÎ °ËÅäÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ °èÃþÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ À繫 ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©´Â ¿î¿µ ºñ¿ëÀ» »ç¿ë·® ¼öÁØ¿¡ ¸ÂÃß´Â º¸´Ù À¯¿¬Çϰí È®Àå °¡´ÉÇÑ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀ» ÀǹÌÇϸç, À̸¦ ÅëÇØ ¿¹»ê ¹× ¸®¼Ò½º °ü¸®ÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¹èÆ÷ ¸ðµ¨À» °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§ ÀÌ ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­´Â Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¼Ö·ç¼Ç°ú ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¸¦ ÇÔ²² °í·ÁÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â ¿ø°Ý ¿î¿µÀ¸·ÎÀÇ Àüȯ°ú È®Àå °¡´ÉÇÏ°í ¾ÈÀüÇÑ °íÆÄ¿ö ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ȯ°æ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡¸¦ °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§ ƯÈ÷ Áß¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ð¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­ÇÏ¸é ´ë±â¾÷°ú Áß¼Ò±â¾÷ÀÌ ±¸ºÐµË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ºÐ·ù´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼öÁØÀÇ ¸®¼Ò½º ¿ä±¸¿Í ´Ù¾çÇÑ ½ÃÀå Ç÷¹À̾ Á÷¸éÇÑ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ °úÁ¦¿Í ±âȸ¸¦ ¹Ý¿µÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±ÝÀ¶, Á¤ºÎ, ÀÇ·á, Á¦Á¶, ¼Ò¸Å¾÷°ú °°Àº »ê¾÷ ºÐ¾ß¸¦ ¸é¹ÐÈ÷ Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ¾÷°èº° ¿ä±¸ »çÇ×ÀÌ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ Ã¤Åðú ¸ÂÃãÈ­¿¡ ¾î¶² ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´ÂÁö ÆÄ¾ÇÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ Áß¿äÇÑ Ãø¸éÀº ¿ëµµº° ºÐ¼®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡¼­´Â µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼® ¹× ó¸®, ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ¹× ¸ðµ¨¸µ¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÓ´Ï´Ù. µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Áý¾àÀûÀÎ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­´Â ºòµ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®°ú º¸´Ù ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ ¿¹Ãø ºÐ¼®À» ±¸ºÐÇϰí, ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ¹× ¸ðµ¨¸µ ºÎ¹®¿¡¼­´Â Á¦Á¶ ¹× °úÇÐ ¿¬±¸ ³»ÀÇ ¿ëµµ¸¦ »ìÆìº¾´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´ÙÂ÷¿øÀûÀÎ ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î ÀüüÀûÀÎ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» °­Á¶ÇÏ°í ±â¼ú, ¹èÆ÷ Àü·« ¹× »ê¾÷º° ¿ä±¸ »çÇ× °£ÀÇ »óÈ£ ÀÛ¿ëÀ» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
      • µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼¾ÅÍÀÇ ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼Òºñ ÃÖÀûÈ­¿¡ ±â¿©ÇÏ´Â Áö¼Ó °¡´É¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½É Áõ°¡
      • ¿¬ÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ¸®¼Ò½º¸¦ ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÏ´Â µðÁöÅÐ Çõ½Å ³ë·ÂÀÇ ±ÞÁõ
      • È¿À²ÀûÀ̰í ÃÖÀûÈ­µÈ ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡
    • ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
      • ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû °³¹ß ¹× ¹èÆ÷¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ³ôÀº ºñ¿ë
    • ±âȸ
      • °úÇÐ ¿¬±¸ ½Ã¼³ÀÇ °í¼º´É ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ¿ä±¸¿¡ ¸ÂÃá ¼Ö·ç¼Ç °³¹ß
      • ´ë±Ô¸ð ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÀÛ¾÷¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ´Â ¼ºÀåÇÏ´Â ºÎ¹®¿¡¼­ ÃÖÀûÈ­µÈ ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µÀ» À§ÇÑ AI ¾Ë°í¸®Áò Ȱ¿ë
    • °úÁ¦
      • ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ±¸Çö ¹× °ü¸®ÀÇ º¹À⼺
  • ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®
    • ÀÌ¿ë ±â¼ú : ÀÇ·á ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¹× »ê¾÷ ÀÚµ¿È­¿¡¼­ IoTÀÇ ºÎ»ó
    • ¹èÆ÷ ¸ðµ¨ : Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº È®À强°ú ºñ¿ë È¿À²¼ºÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ »ó´çÇÑ ÁÖ¸ñÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò½À´Ï´Ù.
  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®
    • Á¤Ä¡
    • °æÁ¦
    • »çȸ
    • ±â¼ú
    • ¹ý·ü
    • ȯ°æ

Á¦6Àå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå : ÀÌ¿ë ±â¼úº°

  • ÀΰøÁö´É
    • µö·¯´×
    • ¸Ó½Å·¯´×
  • »ç¹°ÀÎÅͳÝ(IoT)

Á¦7Àå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå : ¼öÀÍ ¸ðµ¨º°

  • Á¾·®Á¦
  • ±¸µ¶ ±â¹Ý ¼öÀÍ ¸ðµ¨

Á¦8Àå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå : ¹èÆ÷ ¸ðµ¨º°

  • Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¼Ö·ç¼Ç
  • ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º ÀÎÇÁ¶ó

Á¦9Àå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå : Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°

  • ´ë±â¾÷
  • Áß¼Ò±â¾÷

Á¦10Àå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå : ¾÷°èº°

  • ±ÝÀ¶
  • Á¤ºÎ
  • ÀÇ·á
  • Á¦Á¶
  • ¼Ò¸Å

Á¦11Àå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

  • µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼® ¹× ó¸®
    • ºòµ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®
    • ¿¹Ãø ºÐ¼®
  • ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ǰú ¸ðµ¨¸µ
    • Á¦Á¶
    • °úÇÐ ¿¬±¸

Á¦12Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä« ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå

  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ¹Ì±¹

Á¦13Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå

  • È£ÁÖ
  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀϺ»
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • Çѱ¹
  • ´ë¸¸
  • ű¹
  • º£Æ®³²

Á¦14Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ÆÄ¿ö ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå

  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Çɶõµå
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ½ºÀ§½º
  • ÅÍŰ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • ¿µ±¹

Á¦15Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®(2024³â)
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º(2024³â)
  • °æÀï ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼®
  • Àü·« ºÐ¼®°ú Á¦¾È

±â¾÷ ¸ñ·Ï

  • Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  • Alibaba Group
  • Amazon Web Services, Inc.
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • Dell Inc.
  • Fujitsu Limited
  • Google LLC
  • Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
  • Hitachi Vantara LLC
  • Intel Corporation
  • International Business Machines Corporation(IBM)
  • Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • Lenovo Group Limited
  • LogicMonitor, Inc.
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Nasuni Corporation
  • NEC Corporation
  • NetApp, Inc.
  • NVIDIA Corporation
  • Oracle Corporation
  • VMware by Broadcom Inc.
HBR 25.03.20

The Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market was valued at USD 3.82 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.37 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 14.61%, reaching USD 8.67 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 3.82 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 4.37 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 8.67 billion
CAGR (%) 14.61%

The computing power scheduling platform represents a strategic convergence of technology, innovation, and operational efficiency. In today's digital era, industries increasingly rely on automated, algorithm-based decision-making to allocate processing resources, optimize energy consumption, and ensure operational continuity. This introductory overview presents a comprehensive look at a market that is continuously evolving, driven by emerging technologies and shifting business models.

Our journey begins with an exploration of the factors that have resulted in an operational shift-from traditional methods to state-of-the-art scheduling algorithms that leverage data intelligence and real-time analytics. These solutions not only enhance productivity but also provide a clearer competitive advantage. The central role of computing power scheduling is further underscored by its capacity to transform routine tasks into opportunities for strategic performance enhancement.

Moreover, the demand for agility and responsiveness in the face of dynamic market conditions has spurred organizations to reassess their infrastructure investments. As companies grapple with increasing volumes of data and the complexity of operational demands, they are turning to sophisticated platforms that marry technology with efficiency. This transformation has been catalyzed by the need to accommodate rapid technological innovation while maintaining cost-effective operations.

In this evolving landscape, it becomes crucial to understand the underlying market drivers, technological enablers, and the evolving economic models that support the growth of computing power scheduling platforms. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper analysis into the market's segmentation, regional distribution, key industry players, and actionable strategies for future success.

Transformative Shifts in the Computing Power Scheduling Landscape

The landscape of computing power scheduling is undergoing transformative changes, fueled by a convergence of disruptive technologies and evolving business priorities. Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning have enabled these platforms to become more predictive and adaptive, significantly improving operational efficiencies. Coupled with the widespread integration of the Internet of Things, the scope and capabilities of these systems now extend far beyond traditional scheduling, venturing into realms where real-time data analytics drives immediate decision-making.

Organizations now face a dynamic environment characterized by intense competition and rapidly changing technology standards. In response, many are pivoting from static, rigid systems to flexible, scalable solutions that offer enhanced visibility into resource allocation. The integration of cloud-based architectures with on-premise solutions further provides a hybrid model that maximizes performance while ensuring sensitive data is securely managed.

As enterprises harness the power of innovative algorithms and interconnected devices, there is a clear trend toward solutions that are not only cost-effective but also sustainable and environmentally conscious. The market is witnessing a gradual shift from traditional capital expenditure models to more flexible operating expense frameworks, such as pay-per-use or subscription-based revenue models. These shifts underscore a broader reimagining of how technology investments are valued, prioritized, and optimized for long-term growth.

This evolution is setting the stage for an era where computational resources are democratized and available on demand, ensuring that every facet of organizational operations is powered by intelligent, efficient scheduling solutions. The following sections delve into the finer details of market segmentation, regional dynamics, and core industry players driving this change.

Key Segmentation Insights Driving Market Dynamics

An in-depth examination of market segmentation provides critical insights into the drivers and opportunities within the computing power scheduling arena. The landscape is analyzed through multiple dimensions, each offering a unique perspective into the utilization of emerging technologies and the structural framework of the industry.

From the viewpoint of technology utilization, the market is dissected into segments that focus on Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things, with the AI domain delving even further into specialized branches such as deep learning and machine learning. This nuanced classification emphasizes the importance of advanced computational methods in optimizing scheduling tasks, where algorithms learn and predict system loads for enhanced resource efficiency.

Revenue models provide another layer of granularity by examining both pay-per-use strategies and subscription-based approaches. These financial frameworks indicate a move towards more flexible and scalable solutions that align operational costs with usage levels, thereby addressing the challenges of budgeting and resource management.

When considering deployment models, the analysis covers cloud-based solutions juxtaposed with on-premise infrastructure. This segmentation is particularly significant given the shift toward remote operations and the increasing demand for scalable, secure, and high-performance computing environments.

Further segmentation based on organization size distinguishes between large enterprises and small to medium-sized enterprises. This categorization is crucial as it reflects the varying degrees of resource demands and the distinct challenges and opportunities faced by different market players. Industry verticals such as finance, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail are scrutinized to understand how sector-specific requirements influence the adoption and customization of these platforms.

Another critical dimension is the analysis of application areas. In this framework, the focus is on data analysis and processing as well as simulation and modeling. The data-intensive side further differentiates between big data analytics and the more nuanced predictive analytics, while the simulation and modeling segment looks into applications within manufacturing and scientific research. This multi-dimensional segmentation underscores the holistic approach in understanding market dynamics and highlights the interplay between technology, deployment strategy, and industry-specific needs.

Based on Technology Utilization, market is studied across Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (IoT). The Artificial Intelligence is further studied across Deep Learning and Machine Learning.

Based on Revenue Models, market is studied across Pay-Per-Use and Subscription-Based.

Based on Deployment Model, market is studied across Cloud-Based Solutions and On-Premise Infrastructure.

Based on Organization Size, market is studied across Large Enterprises and Small & Medium-sized Enterprises.

Based on Vertical, market is studied across Finance, Government, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Retail.

Based on Application Areas, market is studied across Data Analysis & Processing and Simulation & Modeling. The Data Analysis & Processing is further studied across Big Data Analytics and Predictive Analytics. The Simulation & Modeling is further studied across Manufacturing and Scientific Research.

Global Regional Insights Shaping Industry Trends

Regional analysis plays a crucial role in understanding the broad impact of computing power scheduling platforms. A global perspective reveals distinctive trends across diverse geographic areas, each characterized by unique market dynamics and innovation capabilities. In the Americas, for instance, technological advancements are rapidly adopted, driven by a robust economic environment and a high rate of digital transformation. Investors and industry stakeholders in this region increasingly view computational scheduling as a key enabler for competitive advantage in sectors ranging from finance to healthcare.

Meanwhile, the Europe, Middle East & Africa region exhibits a blend of mature markets and emerging opportunities. Organizations here are keen on deploying hybrid solutions that leverage both cloud-based and on-premise infrastructures to meet stringent regulatory and security requirements. This diverse region benefits from a rich history of technological innovation combined with an accelerating pace of digital adoption over the past few years.

In Asia-Pacific, the rapid pace of industrial growth coupled with significant government support for technological innovation has laid the groundwork for impressive market expansion. This region is witnessing a substantial increase in the adoption of sophisticated computing platforms, driven by the region's commitment to modernizing infrastructure and embracing digital transformation. Overall, these regional insights paint a picture of a market that is not only global in scope but also marked by distinct technological and economic trends that drive its evolution.

Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

Leading Companies Driving Market Innovation

A critical look at the competitive landscape reveals the influence of key market players who continue to shape and redefine the computing power scheduling industry. Several multinational corporations have emerged at the forefront, leveraging their technological prowess and strategic investments to drive market innovation. Prominent industry titans such as Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Alibaba Group, Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Cisco Systems, Inc. have been instrumental in offering high-performance, scalable solutions that meet the demands of both global enterprises and niche market segments.

Additionally, companies like Dell Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Google LLC, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP have contributed to refining deployment strategies that balance cost and efficiency while paving the way for innovative cloud-based and integrated on-premise architectures. The technological contributions from Hitachi Vantara LLC, Intel Corporation, and International Business Machines Corporation are equally noteworthy, particularly as these organizations push the boundaries of processing and data analytics capabilities.

Other influential players such as Juniper Networks, Inc., Lenovo Group Limited, and LogicMonitor, Inc. have shown significant commitment to advancing network infrastructure and operational agility. Meanwhile, technology leaders including Microsoft Corporation, Nasuni Corporation, NEC Corporation, and NetApp, Inc. have built a solid reputation for designing systems that seamlessly integrate with diverse operational frameworks. The contributions of NVIDIA Corporation, Oracle Corporation, and VMware by Broadcom Inc. further exemplify the trend towards harnessing deep technological expertise to innovate and optimize computing power scheduling.

The combined efforts of these companies are advancing the industry by energizing the market with cutting-edge research, pioneering technological applications, and strategic investments that drive future growth. Their work sets benchmarks for quality and performance, inspiring a new generation of technology providers to adopt innovative practices and drive the evolution of the industry.

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Alibaba Group, Amazon Web Services, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Google LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP, Hitachi Vantara LLC, Intel Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), Juniper Networks, Inc., Lenovo Group Limited, LogicMonitor, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Nasuni Corporation, NEC Corporation, NetApp, Inc., NVIDIA Corporation, Oracle Corporation, and VMware by Broadcom Inc.. Actionable Recommendations to Propel Market Leadership

For industry leaders who aim to stay ahead in the rapidly evolving market, actionable strategies are essential to harness the full potential of computing power scheduling platforms. To begin with, investing in research and development remains paramount. Continuous innovation, particularly in the areas of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and IoT integration, provides a competitive edge. These technologies empower companies to enhance predictive accuracy and optimize resource allocation effectively.

Leaders should also focus on building robust hybrid infrastructures that combine the scalability of cloud-based solutions with the reliability of on-premise systems. This balanced approach not only ensures high performance but also meets the diverse needs of various industries and regulatory environments. Furthermore, the adoption of flexible revenue models, whether pay-per-use or subscription-based, facilitates alignment between operational expenditures and actual usage, ultimately leading to improved budget planning and financial sustainability.

Additionally, understanding the nuances of market segmentation is vital. Companies are encouraged to tailor their strategies based on organization size, vertical industry requirements, and application areas, ensuring that solutions are customized to address specific challenges. Emphasizing targeted service offerings that resonate with large enterprises as well as small and medium-sized businesses opens avenues for diversified revenue streams and market penetration.

Operational efficiency can be further enhanced by integrating data analytics tools that leverage big data and predictive analytics. Such integrations allow organizations to gain actionable insights, streamline processes, and ultimately realize a significant competitive advantage. The adoption of simulation and modeling, particularly in manufacturing and scientific research, can reveal hidden operational efficiencies and lead to innovative product development.

In summary, a focused approach combining robust innovation, tailored market strategies, and agile infrastructure development will significantly empower industry leaders to navigate and lead in this dynamic market.

Conclusion: Embracing the Future of Computing Power Scheduling

In closing, the evolution of computing power scheduling platforms signifies more than just a technological upgrade-it represents a foundational shift in how industries allocate and manage computational resources. The integration of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things with dynamic deployment models has redefined the industry's framework, fostering greater efficiency and opening up new possibilities for strategic growth.

Market segmentation reveals a multi-dimensional landscape where an in-depth understanding of technology utilization, revenue models, and deployment strategies creates avenues for precise market targeting. In parallel, regional insights underscore the global appeal and the varied pace of technological advancement across different geographies. The competitive arena, bolstered by influential companies prioritizing innovation, serves as a testament to the transformative impact of these platforms.

As organizations worldwide are driven by the desire to maximize operational efficiency and accelerate digital transformation, the cumulative advancements in computing power scheduling redefine both challenges and opportunities. Embracing these innovations is not simply an option, but a strategic necessity for staying competitive in a technology-driven world.

This comprehensive analysis provides a clear roadmap that encapsulates current trends and future directions. By embracing these insights, stakeholders can better position themselves to capture emerging opportunities and drive long-term success.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Market Dynamics
    • 5.1.1. Drivers
      • 5.1.1.1. Increased focus on sustainability contributing to optimized energy consumption in data centers
      • 5.1.1.2. Surge in digital transformation initiatives requiring flexible computing resources
      • 5.1.1.3. Growth in demand for efficient and optimized computing solutions in enterprise sectors
    • 5.1.2. Restraints
      • 5.1.2.1. High cost associated with developing and deploying computing power scheduling platforms
    • 5.1.3. Opportunities
      • 5.1.3.1. Developing solutions tailored for high-performance computing needs in scientific research facilities
      • 5.1.3.2. Leveraging AI algorithms for optimized scheduling in growing sectors that rely on large computational tasks
    • 5.1.4. Challenges
      • 5.1.4.1. Complexity of implementation and managing computing power scheduling platforms
  • 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
    • 5.2.1. Technology Utilization: Emergence of IoT in healthcare monitoring and industrial automation
    • 5.2.2. Deployment Model: Cloud-based solutions gained significant traction due to their scalability and cost-effectiveness
  • 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
  • 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
    • 5.4.1. Political
    • 5.4.2. Economic
    • 5.4.3. Social
    • 5.4.4. Technological
    • 5.4.5. Legal
    • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market, by Technology Utilization

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Artificial Intelligence
    • 6.2.1. Deep Learning
    • 6.2.2. Machine Learning
  • 6.3. Internet of Things (IoT)

7. Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market, by Revenue Models

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Pay-Per-Use
  • 7.3. Subscription-Based

8. Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market, by Deployment Model

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Cloud-Based Solutions
  • 8.3. On-Premise Infrastructure

9. Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market, by Organization Size

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Large Enterprises
  • 9.3. Small & Medium-sized Enterprises

10. Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market, by Vertical

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Finance
  • 10.3. Government
  • 10.4. Healthcare
  • 10.5. Manufacturing
  • 10.6. Retail

11. Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market, by Application Areas

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Data Analysis & Processing
    • 11.2.1. Big Data Analytics
    • 11.2.2. Predictive Analytics
  • 11.3. Simulation & Modeling
    • 11.3.1. Manufacturing
    • 11.3.2. Scientific Research

12. Americas Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Argentina
  • 12.3. Brazil
  • 12.4. Canada
  • 12.5. Mexico
  • 12.6. United States

13. Asia-Pacific Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Australia
  • 13.3. China
  • 13.4. India
  • 13.5. Indonesia
  • 13.6. Japan
  • 13.7. Malaysia
  • 13.8. Philippines
  • 13.9. Singapore
  • 13.10. South Korea
  • 13.11. Taiwan
  • 13.12. Thailand
  • 13.13. Vietnam

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. Denmark
  • 14.3. Egypt
  • 14.4. Finland
  • 14.5. France
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. Israel
  • 14.8. Italy
  • 14.9. Netherlands
  • 14.10. Nigeria
  • 14.11. Norway
  • 14.12. Poland
  • 14.13. Qatar
  • 14.14. Russia
  • 14.15. Saudi Arabia
  • 14.16. South Africa
  • 14.17. Spain
  • 14.18. Sweden
  • 14.19. Switzerland
  • 14.20. Turkey
  • 14.21. United Arab Emirates
  • 14.22. United Kingdom

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
    • 15.3.1. ZTE introduces the first SPN computing power CPE with AI edge inference for transformative digital innovation
    • 15.3.2. Fujitsu's AI computing broker middleware transform GPU allocation to combat shortages and enhance global AI efficiency
    • 15.3.3. Lenovo's new AI services make private AI deployment accessible and scalable through GPUaaS and AI-driven system management innovations
  • 15.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation

Companies Mentioned

  • 1. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  • 2. Alibaba Group
  • 3. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
  • 4. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • 5. Dell Inc.
  • 6. Fujitsu Limited
  • 7. Google LLC
  • 8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
  • 9. Hitachi Vantara LLC
  • 10. Intel Corporation
  • 11. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
  • 12. Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • 13. Lenovo Group Limited
  • 14. LogicMonitor, Inc.
  • 15. Microsoft Corporation
  • 16. Nasuni Corporation
  • 17. NEC Corporation
  • 18. NetApp, Inc.
  • 19. NVIDIA Corporation
  • 20. Oracle Corporation
  • 21. VMware by Broadcom Inc.
ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦