½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1676942

¼¼°èÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀå : ¼ººÐº°, Ä¡·á Ä«Å×°í¸®º°, Á¾¾ç À¯Çüº°, Àû¿ë ÀýÂ÷º°, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚº° ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Radioembolization Therapy Market by Component, Treatment Category, Tumor Type, Application Procedure, End-User - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 189 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°èÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 10¾ï 9,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 2025³â¿¡´Â 11¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ¿¹»óµÇ¸ç, CAGR 5.90%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 15¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ: 2024³â 10¾ï 9,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ: 2025³â 11¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ: 2030³â 15¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 5.90%

¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á´Â °£¾Ï Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ ȹ±âÀûÀÎ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ¸·Î µîÀåÇÏ¿© ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Ä¡·á¹ý¿¡¼­´Â ÁÂÀýÇϱ⠽¬¿î »óȲ¿¡ Èñ¸ÁÀ» °¡Á®¿À°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾àÀº °í±Þ ÀÇ·á ±â¼ú°ú Áß¿äÇÑ È¯ÀÚ °ü¸®ÀÇ À¶ÇÕ ÁöÁ¡¿¡ ¼­ÀÖ´Â ½ÃÀåÀÇ º¹ÀâÇÑ ¼¼ºÎ »çÇ×À» ޱ¸ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀÌ ±Þ¼ÓÈ÷ ÁøÀüµÇ°í ¾Ï Ç¥Àû Ä¡·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁÖ¸ñÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â °¡¿îµ¥ º» ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­´Â ÀÌ º¯ÇõÀûÀÎ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÇöÀç µ¿Çâ, »õ·Î¿î °úÁ¦, ºñÁî´Ï½º ±âȸ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÃÖ±Ù, ÀÇ·á °ü°èÀÚ³ª ¿¬±¸ÀÚÀÇ »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ °£Á¾¾çÀ» °íÁ¤¹Ðµµ·Î ³ë¸®°í, °Ç°­ÇÑ Á¶Á÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÎ¼öÀûÀÎ µ¥¹ÌÁö¸¦ °æ°¨ÇÏ´Â Àúħ½À Ä¡·á¹ýÀ¸·Î¼­, ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁÖ¸ñÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Á¦¾îµÈ ü³» Á¶»ç´Â ¾Ï Ä¡·á¿¡ À־ÀÇ °³º°È­ÀÇ Á߿伺À» °­Á¶ÇÒ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ¿ø¹ß¼º¡¤ÀüÀ̼º °£¾Ï°úÀÇ ½Î¿ò¿¡ À־ÀÇ Ä¡·á ±âÁØÀ» ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿©±â¼­ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â Àü·«Àû ÀλçÀÌÆ®Àº ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ÀÚ, ÇコÄɾî À̳뺣ÀÌÅÍ, ¾÷°è ¸®´õ¿¡°Ô ÇöÀç ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ, ÁÖ¿ä ¼ºÀå ¿äÀÎ ¹× Ãß°¡ Çõ½ÅÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ °³¿ä¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓ»óÀû ÀÀ¿ë, ±â¼úÀû Áøº¸, ¾÷°è Á᫐ ±â¾÷ÀÇ ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» öÀúÈ÷ Á¶»çÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ´ç¸éÀÇ Àü¼úÀû Àüȯ°ú Àå±âÀûÀÎ Àü·« ÀÔ¾ÈÀ» ¸ðµÎ Áö¿øÇÏ´Â ·Îµå¸ÊÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â ÀÓ»ó Áõ°Å¿Í ½ÃÀå µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®À» °áÇÕÇÑ ±ÕÇü ÀâÈù °üÁ¡À» ÅëÇØ º¹ÀâÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ºÐ¾ß¸¦ Ž»öÇÏ·Á´Â ÀÌÇØ °ü°èÀÚ¿¡°Ô ÇʼöÀûÀÎ °¡À̵åÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çö´ë ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á¸¦ °ßÀÎÇÏ´Â º¯ÇõÀû º¯È­

ÃÖ±Ù, ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·áÀÇ »óȲÀº Å©°Ô º¯È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¼ú Çõ½Å°ú Á¾¾ç »ý¹°ÇÐ ¹× ¹æ»ç¼± ¹°¸®Çп¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇØÀÇ ½ÉÈ­´Â Ä¡·á Àü·«ÀÇ ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ º¯È­¸¦ ÀÏÀ¸Ä×½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÁøÈ­´Â ÷´Ü À̹Ì¡ ±â¼ú, Á¤¹ÐÇÏ°Ô ¼³°èµÈ Àü´Þ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¹× Ç¥Àû ¼±·®À» ÀÌÀüº¸´Ù ´õ È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î Àü´ÞÇϵµ·Ï ¼³°èµÈ »õ·Î¿î ¹æ»ç¼º ¹Ì¼Ò±¸Ã¼ÀÇ ÅëÇÕ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °­Á¶µË´Ï´Ù.

Ä«Å×ÅÍ ¼³°èÀÇ Áøº¸´Â ÁÖÀÔ °úÁ¤ÀÇ Á¤È®¼º°ú ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃŰ°í ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·áÀÇ Ä¡·á Áö¼ö¸¦ ´õ¿í Çâ»ó½Ãŵ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¼úÀû °³¼±À» º¸¿ÏÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î, Ä¡·á °èȹ°ú ½Ç½Ã°£ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀ» °­È­ÇÏ´Â ¿µ»ó Áø´Ü ¾ç½ÄÀÇ Ã¤¿ëÀÌ ÀÖ¾î ÀÓ»óÀû ½Å·Ú¼ºÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °Ô´Ù°¡ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©°ú »óȯ Á¤Ã¥ÀÌ ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °Íµµ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¢±Ù°ú ¼ö¿ë È®´ë¿¡ ±æÀ» ¿­°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÇ»ç, ¿£Áö´Ï¾î, ÀÇ·á±â±â Á¦Á¶¾÷ü °£ÀÇ Çù·Â °ü°è°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀÇ ¼Óµµ°¡ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº ÇöÀç ÀÓ»ó Àü¹® Áö½Ä°ú ±â¼ú·ÂÀÇ ½Ã³ÊÁö È¿°ú¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·áÀÇ Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ È¿°ú¸¦ ³ôÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °³ÀÎÈ­µÈ Ä¡·á ¿ä¹ý¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÎ¸é ½ÃÀåÀº ȹÀÏÀûÀÎ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù ¸ÂÃãÈ­µÈ Á¤¹Ð ±â¹Ý ±â¼ú·Î ÀüȯÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Çö´ë Á¾¾çÇÐÀû Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¿ªÇÒÀº ´õ¿í È®°íÇØÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ º¯ÇõÀÇ ±æ¿¡´Â °úÁ¦°¡ ¾ø´Â °ÍÀº ¾Æ´Õ´Ï´Ù. ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ °Ç°­ °ü¸® ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ ¿öÅ©¿¡ »õ·Î¿î ±â¼úÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÏ·Á¸é ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ±³À°°ú °³¾÷ ÀÇ»çÀÇ ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀ» ÀçÁ¶Á¤ÇؾßÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±×·³¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸Çϰí ȯÀÚÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ °³¼±Çϰí Àü½Å µ¶¼ºÀ» ÁÙÀÌ´Â µîÀÇ ÀáÀçÀû ÀÌÁ¡ÀºÀÌ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ Ä¡·á Àü·«ÀÇ ²÷ÀÓ¾ø´Â ÁøÈ­¸¦ ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀ» µå·¯³»´Â ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ÅëÂû·Â

¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀåÀ» ´õ ±íÀÌ ÀÌÇØÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ¸î °¡Áö ÁÖ¿ä ¼¼ºÐÈ­¸¦ Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ºÐ¼®ÇؾßÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ½ÃÀåÀº Ä«Å×ÅÍ, ÇÙÀÇÇÐ Àåºñ, ¹æ»ç¼º ¹Ì¼Ò±¸, ¿¢½º·¹ÀÌ Àåºñ¿Í °°Àº °í±Þ Àåºñ¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò ºÐ¼®À» ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ÇØºÎµË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¼¼ºÐÈ­Àº °¢ ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò°¡ ¿øÈ°ÇÑ Ä¡·á °úÁ¤À» ÃËÁøÇϴµ¥ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϸç, ±â¼úÀÌ ¾ÈÀü ±âÁذú ¾÷¹« È¿À²¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÏ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ, ½ÃÀåÀº Ä¡·á Ä«Å×°í¸®¶ó´Â ·»Á ÅëÇØ ºÐ¼®µÇ¾î Ä¡·áÀû Á¢±Ù°ú ¿ÏÈ­Àû Á¢±ÙÀ» ±¸º°ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±¸º°Àº ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·áÀÇ À̸鼺À» °­Á¶ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ̸ç, ¾î¶² ȯÀÚ´Â Áúº´ÀÇ ±ÙÀýÀ» ÀǵµÇÏ°í ±ÙÄ¡ÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á¸¦ ¿ä±¸ÇÏ°í ¶Ç ¾î¶² ȯÀÚ´Â ³­Ä¡¼º Áúȯ¿¡ Á÷¸éÇÏ¿© QOLÀÇ Çâ»óÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¿ÏÈ­Àû Ä¡·á¸¦ ¼±ÅÃÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¾ç¸é¼ºÀº ÀÓ»ó È¿°ú¿Í ȯÀÚ Áß½ÉÀÇ °á°úÀÇ ±ÕÇüÀ» ÀâÀ¸·Á´Â Á¦Á¶¾÷üÀÇ Çõ½Å¿¡ ¹ÚÂ÷¸¦ °¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ Á¾¾çÀÇ À¯ÇüÀ» ¼¼ºÐÈ­ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀüÀ̼º °£¾Ï°ú ¿ø¹ß¼º °£¾ÏÀÇ Áõ·Ê·Î ³ª´­ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀüÀ̼º °£¾ÏÀÇ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Ư¡°ú ÁøÇà ÆÐÅÏÀº ¿ø¹ß¼º °£¾Ç¼º Á¾¾ç°ú´Â ´Ù¸¥ Ä¡·á»óÀÇ ¹è·Á¸¦ ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ÀÌ ±¸ºÐÀº ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ÀÌ ¼¼ºÐÈ­Àº Ä¡·á ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ¿¡ ¹Ý¿µµÉ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, Ư¼öÇÑ Ç¥Àû ¿ä¹ýÀ» À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°³¹ß ³ë·ÂÀÇ ¹æÇâÀÌ µË´Ï´Ù.

Àû¿ë ÀýÂ÷¿¡ ±âÃÊÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­Àº °£ Á¾¾ç, ¿±¸é ¿ä¹ý, ºÐÀý ¿ä¹ýÀ» ±¸º°ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¿ì¸®ÀÇ ÀÌÇØ¸¦ ´õ¿í ½ÉÈ­½Ãŵ´Ï´Ù. °¢°¢ÀÇ ÀýÂ÷´Â Á¾¾çÀÇ ÇüÅÂ¿Í È¯ÀÚÀÇ ÇØºÎÇÐÀû ±¸Á¶ÀÇ ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ ´Ù·ç´Â µ¶Æ¯ÇÑ Á¢±Ù¹ýÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿© °³º° ÀÓ»ó ¿ä±¸¸¦ ÃæÁ·½Ãŵ´Ï´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚº° ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÀÇ·á Á¦°ø ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ Àü¸ÁÀ» ±×¸®´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µË´Ï´Ù. ¿Ü·¡¼ö¼ú¼¾ÅÍ(ASC)¿Í ¾Ï ¿¬±¸ ±â°ü¿¡¼­ Á¾ÇÕ º´¿ø¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚÀÇ ´Ù¾ç¼ºÀº ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ±â¼úÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ Ã¤¿ëÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¸ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ¹üÀ§¿Í ÀûÀÀ¼ºÀ» µÎµå·¯Áö°Ô Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
      • ¼¼°è¿¡¼­ °£¾Ï°ú °£°æº¯ÀÇ ÀÌȯÀ²ÀÌ Áõ°¡
      • ¼¼°èÀÇ ÇコÄɾî ÀÎÇÁ¶óÀÇ È®´ë
      • ¼¼°è ¾Ï Ä¡·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤ºÎÀÇ Áö¿ø°ú ÀÚ±Ý Á¦°ø
    • ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
      • ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú¿¡ µû¸¥ °í¾×ÀÇ ºñ¿ë
    • ±âȸ
      • º´¿ø°ú ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÅ×Å©³î·¯Áö ±â¾÷°úÀÇ Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ »õ·Î¿î Ä¡·á¹ýÀÇ Çõ½Å
      • »ý»ê ºñ¿ëÀ» ³·Ãß°í Á¢±Ù¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇÑ ´ëü ¹æ»ç¼º µ¿À§ ¿ø¼ÒÀÇ °³¹ß
    • °úÁ¦
      • ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·áÀÇ º¹ÀâÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦ ½ÂÀΰú »óȯ ¹®Á¦
  • ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®
    • Ä¡·á Ä«Å×°í¸® : ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ Ä¡·á Ä¡·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼±È£µµ Áõ°¡
    • Àû¿ë ¼ö¼ú: ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á °£ Á¾¾ç Ä¡·áÀÇ Àû¿ë È®´ë
  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®
    • Á¤Ä¡Àû
    • °æÁ¦
    • »çȸ
    • ±â¼úÀû
    • ¹ý·ü»ó
    • ȯ°æ

Á¦6Àå ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀå : ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ®º°

  • Ä«Å×ÅÍ
  • ÇÙÀÇÇÐ ±â±â
  • ¹æ»ç¼º ¸¶ÀÌÅ©·Î½ºÇǾî
  • X¼± ÀåÄ¡

Á¦7Àå ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀå Ä¡·á : Ä«Å×°í¸®º°

  • Ä¡À¯
  • ¿ÏÈ­

Á¦8Àå ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀå : Á¾¾ç À¯Çüº°

  • ÀüÀ̼º °£¾Ï
  • ¿ø¹ß¼º °£¾Ï

Á¦9Àå ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀå : Àû¿ë ¼ö¼ú

  • °£ Á¾¾ç
  • ¿±»ó¿ä¹ý
  • ºÎ¹® ¿ä¹ý

Á¦10Àå ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • ¿Ü·¡¼ö¼ú¼¾ÅÍ(ASC)
  • ¾Ï ¿¬±¸±â°ü
  • º´¿ø

Á¦11Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀå

  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ¹Ì±¹

Á¦12Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀå

  • È£ÁÖ
  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀϺ»
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • Çѱ¹
  • ´ë¸¸
  • ű¹
  • º£Æ®³²

Á¦13Àå À¯·´¡¤Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± »öÀü¼ú Ä¡·á ½ÃÀå

  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Çɶõµå
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ½ºÀ§½º
  • ÅÍŰ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • ¿µ±¹

Á¦14Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼®
  • Àü·« ºÐ¼®°ú Á¦¾È

±â¾÷ ¸ñ·Ï

  • Bayer AG
  • Becton Dickinson & Company
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Cook Medical
  • Elekta AB
  • Fortis Healthcare Limited
  • Hamilton Health Sciences
  • Mayo Clinic Health System
  • Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
  • Nordion Inc.
  • Northwestern Memorial HealthCare.
  • Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
  • Siemens AG
  • Sirtex Medical Pty Ltd
  • Stryker Corporation
  • Terumo Corporation
  • United HealthCare Services, Inc
JHS 25.03.20

The Radioembolization Therapy Market was valued at USD 1.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1.15 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.90%, reaching USD 1.54 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 1.09 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 1.15 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 1.54 billion
CAGR (%) 5.90%

Radioembolization therapy has emerged as a groundbreaking solution in the treatment landscape for liver cancers, offering hope where conventional treatments have often fallen short. This executive summary explores the intricate details of a market that stands at the convergence of advanced medical technology and critical patient care. In an era of rapidly evolving innovations and intensified focus on targeted oncological therapies, our analysis encapsulates current trends, emerging challenges, and opportunities in this transformative field.

In recent years, medical professionals and researchers have increasingly turned to radioembolization as a minimally invasive procedure that targets liver tumors with high precision, thereby reducing collateral damage to healthy tissues. This controlled form of internal radiation not only underscores the significance of personalization in cancer treatment but also redefines standards of care in the fight against both primary and metastatic liver cancers. The strategic insights provided here are designed to offer decision-makers, healthcare innovators, and industry leaders a comprehensive overview of the current market dynamics, key growth drivers, and areas ripe for further innovation.

Through an in-depth exploration of clinical applications, technological advancements, and the influence of pivotal industry players, we aim to present a roadmap that supports both immediate tactical shifts and long-term strategic planning. With a balanced perspective that merges clinical evidence with market data analysis, this report serves as an essential guide for stakeholders seeking to navigate the complexities of the radioembolization therapy space.

Transformative Shifts Driving the Modern Radioembolization Therapy Landscape

The landscape of radioembolization therapy has undergone significant transformations in recent years. Technological innovations, coupled with an increased understanding of tumor biology and radiation physics, have catalyzed a paradigm shift in treatment strategies. This evolution is underscored by the integration of advanced imaging technologies, precision-engineered delivery systems, and novel radioactive microspheres designed to deliver targeted doses more effectively than ever before.

Advancements in catheter design have improved the precision and safety of the infusion process, further boosting the therapeutic index of radioembolization treatments. Complementary to these technical improvements is the adoption of imaging modalities that enhance treatment planning and real-time monitoring, thereby driving greater clinical confidence. Additionally, the evolving regulatory frameworks and reimbursement policies across various regions have paved the way for increased accessibility and acceptance of these innovative treatment procedures.

Increasing collaborations among physicians, engineers, and medical device manufacturers have also accelerated the pace of innovation. Stakeholders are now able to harness the synergy between clinical expertise and technological prowess, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness of radioembolization procedures. With a focus on personalized treatment regimens, the market is shifting from a one-size-fits-all approach to a more customized, precision-based methodology, further solidifying its role in modern oncological care.

This transformative journey is not without challenges. The integration of new technologies into traditional healthcare frameworks requires extensive training and a recalibration of practitioner protocols. Nonetheless, the potential benefits in terms of improved patient outcomes and reduced systemic toxicities are driving the continuous evolution of therapeutic strategies in this space.

Segmentation Insights Illuminating Market Dynamics

A deeper understanding of the radioembolization therapy market emerges from a precise analysis of several key segmentation dimensions. The market is dissected based on component analysis, which includes sophisticated devices such as catheters, nuclear medicine equipment, radioactive microspheres, and x-ray equipment. This segmentation allows us to appreciate how each component plays a pivotal role in facilitating a seamless treatment process, where technology meets safety standards and operational efficiency.

Furthermore, the market is analyzed through the lens of treatment categories, distinguishing between curative and palliative approaches. Such differentiation underscores the dual nature of radioembolization therapy, where some patients seek radical treatment with the intent to eradicate the disease, while others opt for palliative care aimed at improving quality of life in the face of intractable conditions. This duality has spurred innovation as manufacturers strive to balance clinical efficacy with patient-centric outcomes.

In addition, tumor type segmentation provides an insightful breakdown into cases of metastatic liver cancer versus primary liver cancer. This distinction is crucial, as the biological characteristics and progression patterns of metastatic liver cancer often require different therapeutic considerations compared to primary liver malignancies. As a result, this segmentation not only informs treatment protocols but also directs research and development efforts toward specialized, targeted therapies.

The segmentation based on application procedure further refines our understanding by differentiating between liver tumor, lobar therapy, and segmental therapy. Each procedure offers a unique approach to addressing the nuances of tumor morphology and patient anatomy, thereby catering to individualized clinical needs. Finally, segmentation by end-user helps chart the landscape across various healthcare delivery settings. From ambulatory surgical centers and cancer research institutes to comprehensive hospitals, the diversity in end-users points to a broad-based adoption of radioembolization therapy techniques, accentuating the market's expansive reach and adaptability.

Based on Component, market is studied across Catheters, Nuclear Medicine Equipment, Radioactive Microspheres, and X-Ray Equipment.

Based on Treatment Category, market is studied across Curative and Palliative.

Based on Tumor Type, market is studied across Metastatic Liver Cancer and Primary Liver Cancer.

Based on Application Procedure, market is studied across Liver Tumour, Lobar Therapy, and Segmental Therapy.

Based on End-User, market is studied across Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Cancer Research Institutes, and Hospitals.

Regional Insights Highlighting Global Trends

The global footprint of radioembolization therapy is marked by distinct regional trends that reflect varying degrees of market maturity and healthcare infrastructure readiness. In the Americas, robust healthcare systems and substantial investments in oncological research have supported the early adoption and integration of radioembolization therapy. Clinicians and healthcare providers in this region are leveraging advanced technologies to push the boundaries of personalized medicine.

Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory dynamics, coupled with a balanced emphasis on both innovative research and cost-effective care solutions, are shaping the market landscape. European nations, in particular, have seen a rapid acceleration in clinical research alongside an emphasis on safety protocols and treatment efficacy. Meanwhile, emerging markets within the Middle East and Africa are gradually building capacity, laying the groundwork for a more extensive uptake of these advanced therapeutic solutions.

In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid economic growth, government initiatives, and strategic partnerships are driving significant investments in healthcare innovation. The region is witnessing a swift expansion in infrastructural capabilities and a surge in clinical trials, underpinning a growing interest in adopting radioembolization therapy at scale. The confluence of progressive health policies and increased public awareness ensures that radioembolization therapy will continue to play a central role in addressing the rising cancer burden in these territories.

These regional insights not only highlight the market's diversity but also serve as a catalyst for cross-regional knowledge sharing and strategic collaborations. The global nature of the market is driving a convergence of best practices that benefit all stakeholders and ultimately lead to enhanced patient care worldwide.

Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

In-Depth Company Insights Shaping the Market Evolution

At the core of radioembolization therapy's innovation and growth are the key companies that continuously push the envelope of medical technology. Industry leaders such as Bayer AG, Becton Dickinson & Company, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Cook Medical are at the forefront of research and development, leveraging vast resources to innovate new solutions for precise treatment delivery. This competitive landscape is further enriched by players like Elekta AB, Fortis Healthcare Limited, and Hamilton Health Sciences, whose contributions highlight the integration of clinical expertise with innovative technological advancements.

Innovative healthcare institutions including the Mayo Clinic Health System, Merit Medical Systems, Inc., Nordion Inc., and Northwestern Memorial HealthCare are driving clinical excellence and setting high benchmarks in therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. plays a crucial role in fostering educational initiatives and promoting research collaborations, while global giants such as Siemens AG and Sirtex Medical Pty Ltd are pivotal in optimizing treatment dosimetry and procedural accuracy.

Other influential entities such as Stryker Corporation, Terumo Corporation, and United HealthCare Services, Inc. enrich the competitive environment by focusing on process innovation, patient safety measures, and cost containment strategies. The collaboration and competition among these companies not only drive technological progress but also enhance the overall standards of care, ensuring that patients receive the most advanced and effective treatments available.

Each of these industry leaders contributes unique insights based on their regional dominance, product portfolios, and research trajectories. Their continued innovation is instrumental in addressing the evolving needs of the radioembolization therapy market, ensuring a trajectory of sustained growth and improved patient outcomes.

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Radioembolization Therapy Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Bayer AG, Becton Dickinson & Company, Boston Scientific Corporation, Cook Medical, Elekta AB, Fortis Healthcare Limited, Hamilton Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Health System, Merit Medical Systems, Inc., Nordion Inc., Northwestern Memorial HealthCare., Radiological Society of North America, Inc., Siemens AG, Sirtex Medical Pty Ltd, Stryker Corporation, Terumo Corporation, and United HealthCare Services, Inc. Actionable Strategic Recommendations for Industry Leaders

Industry leaders can capitalize on emerging opportunities in the radioembolization therapy market by embracing a multi-faceted approach that aligns with both current trends and future advancements. First, investing in research and innovation remains paramount. As technology continues to evolve, allocating resources towards the development of next-generation delivery systems and enhanced imaging modalities will be critical. Leaders should focus on partnerships with research institutions and clinical experts to foster an environment of collaborative innovation that accelerates the translation of laboratory breakthroughs to clinical application.

Second, market penetration and global outreach should be driven by a deep understanding of regional dynamics. Customizing product offerings to meet the specific clinical and regulatory requirements of diverse markets will improve adoption rates. This involves tailoring devices and protocols for varied healthcare settings, which range from advanced hospitals to emerging cancer research centers. A data-driven approach to regional market analysis can guide strategic investment and inform the development of localized training programs, ensuring that new technologies are efficiently integrated into current clinical practices.

Third, enhancing patient-centric strategies through personalized therapy protocols can provide a competitive edge. By leveraging segmentation insights based on treatment category, tumor type, and application procedures, companies can align their product development efforts with real-world patient needs. This strategy not only improves treatment outcomes but also builds greater trust and recognition among both clinicians and patients.

Moreover, forging strategic alliances across the value chain-including partnerships with technology providers, regulatory advisors, and healthcare institutions-can drive synergies that accelerate market growth. Through collaborative ventures, companies can share best practices, streamline manufacturing processes, and overcome common regulatory hurdles.

Lastly, adopting proactive communication strategies to educate clinicians, patients, and regulatory bodies will be crucial for market expansion. An informed market is more likely to embrace innovative therapeutic solutions, thereby creating a favorable ecosystem for sustained growth. Effective educational campaigns and stakeholder engagement initiatives should form an integral part of any company's strategy moving forward.

By implementing these actionable recommendations, industry leaders can not only enhance their competitive positioning but also drive meaningful advancements in clinical practice, ultimately improving the standard of care for patients worldwide.

Conclusion: Summarizing the Key Insights

In summary, the evolving landscape of radioembolization therapy is marked by significant technological advances, regional diversification, and complex market dynamics that necessitate adaptive strategies by industry stakeholders. Our analysis underscores the importance of an integrated approach that leverages both technological innovation and strategic collaborations to meet the rising demand for personalized cancer treatments.

From understanding the nuances of market segmentation based on component, treatment category, tumor type, application procedure, and end-users to appreciating the subtle regional influences across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, it is evident that a one-size-fits-all strategy is ineffective in this complex domain. The diverse contributions of key companies reaffirm the need for continuous innovation and strategic investments that align product offerings with clinical requirements. These insights serve as a roadmap for how to navigate the challenges and opportunities in a market that is not only competitive but is also rapidly evolving.

As the radioembolization therapy landscape continues to mature, ensuring that research, innovation, and regional insights are adequately integrated into strategic planning will be essential. This integrated approach will support better clinical outcomes and drive sustained market growth, ensuring that cutting-edge treatments are accessible to patients globally.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Market Dynamics
    • 5.1.1. Drivers
      • 5.1.1.1. Increasing prevalence of liver cancer and cirrhosis among patients globally
      • 5.1.1.2. Expansion in healthcare infrastructure worldwide
      • 5.1.1.3. Government support and funding for cancer treatment initiatives worldwide
    • 5.1.2. Restraints
      • 5.1.2.1. High costs associated with radioembolization procedures
    • 5.1.3. Opportunities
      • 5.1.3.1. Strategic partnerships between hospitals and biotechnology firms for innovating novel therapies
      • 5.1.3.2. Development of alternative radioisotopes for lowering production costs and increasing accessibility
    • 5.1.4. Challenges
      • 5.1.4.1. Complex regulatory approvals and reimbursement issues for radioembolization therapy
  • 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
    • 5.2.1. Treatment Category: Increasing preference for curative treatments in radioembolization therapy
    • 5.2.2. Application Procedure: Expanding application of radioembolization therapy liver tumor treatments
  • 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
  • 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
    • 5.4.1. Political
    • 5.4.2. Economic
    • 5.4.3. Social
    • 5.4.4. Technological
    • 5.4.5. Legal
    • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Radioembolization Therapy Market, by Component

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Catheters
  • 6.3. Nuclear Medicine Equipment
  • 6.4. Radioactive Microspheres
  • 6.5. X-Ray Equipment

7. Radioembolization Therapy Market, by Treatment Category

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Curative
  • 7.3. Palliative

8. Radioembolization Therapy Market, by Tumor Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Metastatic Liver Cancer
  • 8.3. Primary Liver Cancer

9. Radioembolization Therapy Market, by Application Procedure

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Liver Tumour
  • 9.3. Lobar Therapy
  • 9.4. Segmental Therapy

10. Radioembolization Therapy Market, by End-User

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • 10.3. Cancer Research Institutes
  • 10.4. Hospitals

11. Americas Radioembolization Therapy Market

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Argentina
  • 11.3. Brazil
  • 11.4. Canada
  • 11.5. Mexico
  • 11.6. United States

12. Asia-Pacific Radioembolization Therapy Market

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Australia
  • 12.3. China
  • 12.4. India
  • 12.5. Indonesia
  • 12.6. Japan
  • 12.7. Malaysia
  • 12.8. Philippines
  • 12.9. Singapore
  • 12.10. South Korea
  • 12.11. Taiwan
  • 12.12. Thailand
  • 12.13. Vietnam

13. Europe, Middle East & Africa Radioembolization Therapy Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Denmark
  • 13.3. Egypt
  • 13.4. Finland
  • 13.5. France
  • 13.6. Germany
  • 13.7. Israel
  • 13.8. Italy
  • 13.9. Netherlands
  • 13.10. Nigeria
  • 13.11. Norway
  • 13.12. Poland
  • 13.13. Qatar
  • 13.14. Russia
  • 13.15. Saudi Arabia
  • 13.16. South Africa
  • 13.17. Spain
  • 13.18. Sweden
  • 13.19. Switzerland
  • 13.20. Turkey
  • 13.21. United Arab Emirates
  • 13.22. United Kingdom

14. Competitive Landscape

  • 14.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 14.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 14.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
    • 14.3.1. SINTX Technologies partners with NED Medical under a joint development agreement
    • 14.3.2. ABK Biomedical received FDA approval to proceed to Stage 2 of their Route90 pivotal study,
    • 14.3.3. Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre introduced radioembolization to treat liver cancer
  • 14.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation

Companies Mentioned

  • 1. Bayer AG
  • 2. Becton Dickinson & Company
  • 3. Boston Scientific Corporation
  • 4. Cook Medical
  • 5. Elekta AB
  • 6. Fortis Healthcare Limited
  • 7. Hamilton Health Sciences
  • 8. Mayo Clinic Health System
  • 9. Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
  • 10. Nordion Inc.
  • 11. Northwestern Memorial HealthCare.
  • 12. Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
  • 13. Siemens AG
  • 14. Sirtex Medical Pty Ltd
  • 15. Stryker Corporation
  • 16. Terumo Corporation
  • 17. United HealthCare Services, Inc
ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦