½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1715426

¼¼°èÀÇ ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : Á¦°ø Á¦Ç°º°, ¼ÒÀ¯ÀÚº°, ¼ºÁúº°, ¹°°Ç À¯Çüº°, Àü°³ Áö¿ªº°, Áö¸®Àû À§Ä¡, ¹°°Ç ±Ô¸ðº° - ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Property Management Market by Offering, Ownership, Nature, Property Type, Deployment, Geographic Location, Property Size - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 197 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡´Â 296¾ï 9,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. 2025³â¿¡´Â CAGR 9.96%·Î 326¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ¼ºÀåÇϰí, 2030³â¿¡´Â 525¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ : 2024³â 296¾ï 9,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ : 2025³â 326¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ : 2030³â 525¾ï ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 9.96%

ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® »ê¾÷ÀÌ ³¯·Î ¹ßÀüÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, È¿À²¼º°ú Çõ½Å¼ºÀ» µ¿½Ã¿¡ À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ °¡Àå Áß¿äÇÑ °úÁ¦°¡ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÚ»ê °¨µ¶°ú ¿î¿µ °ü¸®¶ó´Â ¿À·£ ¿øÄ¢¿¡ »Ñ¸®¸¦ µÐ ÀÌ »ê¾÷Àº ÇöÀç ±â¼ú ¹ßÀü, ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀÇ º¯È­, ¼ÒºñÀÚ ±â´ëÄ¡ÀÇ ÁøÈ­¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î ±Þ°ÝÇÑ º¯È­¸¦ °æÇèÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹æ½ÄÀÌ Çö´ëÀûÀÌ°í ¹ÎøÇÑ Àü·«À¸·Î ´ëüµÇ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸®¾÷üµéÀº µðÁöÅÐ µµ±¸¿Í ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º ÃÖÀûÈ­¸¦ µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ´Ù¾çÇÑ Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À¸¦ º¸´Ù È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î °ü¸®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ °³°ýÀûÀÎ °³¿ä´Â Áö±Ý±îÁöÀÇ ÁøÀü»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ¹Ì·¡ ½ÃÀåÀ» Á¤ÀÇÇÏ´Â Àü·«Àû Çʼö ¿ä¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÀÚ¼¼È÷ ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº °ËÁõµÈ °ü¸® ¹æ½Ä°ú ¼±±¸ÀûÀÎ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» °áÇÕÇÏ¿© ¿ÜºÎ ¾Ð·Â¿¡ À¯¿¬ÇÏ°í °ß°íÇÑ ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¿î¿µ ¸ðµ¨À» ±¸ÃàÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´Â °úÁ¦¸¦ ¾È°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÃÖ÷´Ü ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼Ö·ç¼Ç°ú ¸ÂÃãÇü ¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ »óÈ£ ÀÛ¿ëÀº ÀûÀÀ¼ºÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ´õ¿í °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿À´Ã³¯ÀÇ °æÀï ȯ°æ¿¡¼­´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­ÀÇ ¹è°æÀÌ µÇ´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÏ°í ¹Ì·¡ Æ®·»µå¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¼º°ø°ú Ź¿ùÇÑ ¿î¿µÀ» À§ÇØ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀÇ º¯È­

÷´Ü ±â¼úÀÇ ÅëÇÕ°ú ±ÔÁ¦ ȯ°æÀÇ ÁøÈ­·Î ÀÎÇØ ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ȯ°æÀº Å« º¯È­ÀÇ ½Ã±â¸¦ ¸ÂÀÌÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ µðÁöÅÐÈ­´Â ºÎµ¿»ê ¿î¿µÀ» °£¼ÒÈ­Çϰí Å×³ÍÆ® °æÇèÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃŰ´Â Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀÇ µµÀÔ¿¡ ¹ÚÂ÷¸¦ °¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý Ç÷§Æû, ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼Ç, µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®°ú °°Àº »õ·Î¿î µµ±¸´Â ÀÚ»ê °ü¸®ÀÚ°¡ ºÎµ¿»êÀ» ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ, À¯Áö °ü¸® ¹× È«º¸ÇÏ´Â ¹æ½ÄÀ» ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ¿Í ÇÔ²², ±ÔÁ¦ º¯°æ°ú Ã¥ÀÓ ¿ä±¸ »çÇ×ÀÇ °­È­·Î ÀÎÇØ ¾÷°è Âü¿©ÀÚµéÀº º¸´Ù Åõ¸íÇϰí È¿À²ÀûÀÎ ¹æ½ÄÀ» äÅÃÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­´Â ¸®½ºÅ©¸¦ ÁÙÀÏ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ´õ ³ôÀº ¿î¿µ ±âÁذú ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°øÀÇ °³¼±À¸·Î À̾îÁú ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±æÀ» ¿­¾îÁÝ´Ï´Ù. ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹æ½ÄÀÌ µðÁöÅÐ ¿ì¼± Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ´ëüµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó »ê¾÷°è´Â ¿î¿µ ºñ¿ë Àý°¨, ´ëÀÀ·Â Çâ»ó, ºÐ¼® ´É·Â Çâ»ó µîÀÇ ÇýÅÃÀ» ´©¸®°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, IoT ¼¾¼­ ¹× ÀÚµ¿ À¯Áöº¸¼ö ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú °°Àº ½º¸¶Æ® ±â¼úÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀº ÀÏ»ó ¾÷¹«¸¦ Çõ½ÅÇÏ°í ½Ç½Ã°£ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁý°ú ÀÔÁÖÀÚÀÇ ¾ÈÀü°ú ÀÚ»êÀÇ ¼ö¸íÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ ¿¹Ãø À¯Áöº¸¼ö¸¦ º¸ÀåÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­´Â ºñÁî´Ï½º ¸ðµ¨À» À籸¼ºÇÏ°í ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ¼º°øÀ» À§ÇÑ »õ·Î¿î º¥Ä¡¸¶Å©¸¦ È®¸³ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ±â¿©Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ÀλçÀÌÆ®

½ÃÀåÀ» ¸é¹ÐÈ÷ Á¶»çÇÏ¸é ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Æ¯¼ºÀ» µå·¯³»´Â ´ÙÃþÀûÀÎ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ Á¢±Ù¹ýÀ» ¹ß°ßÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ù ¹øÂ° ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¿¡ µû¶ó ¼­ºñ½º ¹× ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¸¦ ±¸ºÐÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î, ¼­ºñ½º´Â °ü¸®Çü ¼­ºñ½º¿Í Àü¹® ¼­ºñ½º·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­µË´Ï´Ù. Àü¹® ¼­ºñ½º¿¡¼­´Â °í°´ Áö¿ø, ¿Âº¸µù, SLA °ü¸®, ±³À° ¹× ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ, °í°´ Áö¿ø, ¿Âº¸µù, SLA °ü¸®, ±³À° ¹× ÄÁ¼³ÆÃÀÌ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ä¼Ò·Î µîÀåÇϰí, ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò¿¡¼­´Â ½Ã¼³ ¹× ÀÚ»ê °ü¸®, ÀÓ´ë °ü¸®, ¸¶ÄÉÆÃ ¹× Å×³ÍÆ® Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀ̼Ç, ½Ã¼³ ¹× ÀÚ»ê °ü¸®, ÀÓ´ë °ü¸®, ¸¶ÄÉÆÃ ¹× Å×³ÍÆ® Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀ̼Ç, ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò·Î ±¸ºÐµË´Ï´Ù. ¹× Å×³ÍÆ® Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀ̼Ç, º¸°í ¹× ºÐ¼®, º¸¾È ¹× °áÁ¦ µîÀÌ ºÐ¼®µË´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ, ¼ÒÀ¯ ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷º°È­¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¿î¿µ ÁÖü¸¦ »ç³» ¶Ç´Â Á¦3ÀÚ·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© ´Ù¾çÇÑ °ü¸® Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» Á¶¸íÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ºÎµ¿»êÀÇ °è¾à ³»¿ë¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡¼­´Â ½ÃÀåÀ» Àå±â°è¾à°ú ´Ü±â°è¾àÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ºÎµ¿»ê À¯Çüº° ºÐ·ù´Â »ó¾÷½Ã¼³, Á¤ºÎ/±º»ç½Ã¼³, »ê¾÷½Ã¼³, º¹Çսü³, ÁְŽü³ µîÀÇ Ä«Å×°í¸®·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, »ó¾÷¿ëÀº Ä·ÇÎÀå, RVÆÄÅ©, µ¥ÀÌÅͼ¾ÅÍ Çãºê, ±³À° ¹× ÀÇ·á±â°ü, ¹°·ù ¹× ¹è¼Û¼¾ÅÍ, ¿ÀÇǽº ¹× ÄÚ¿öÅ·½ºÆäÀ̽º, ¸®Å×ÀÏ °ø°£, â°í µîÀÇ Àü¹® ºÐ¾ß·Î, ÁÖ°Å¿ëÀº ¾ÆÆÄÆ®, °ÔÀÌÆ¼µå Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ, Ÿ¿îÇϿ콺, ºô¶ó/ÄÄÆÄ¿îµå µîÀ¸·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­µË´Ï´Ù. ÄÄÆÄ¿îµå µîÀ¸·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­µË´Ï´Ù. ¿ÂŬ¶ó¿ìµå ¶Ç´Â On-Premise ±¸Ãà ¼±È£µµ, Áö¹æ, ±³¿Ü, µµ½Ã µî Áö¿ªÀû ÀÔÁö Á¶°Ç, ´ë±Ô¸ð ºÎµ¿»ê°ú Áß¼ÒÇü ºÎµ¿»êÀÇ ±¸ºÐ µîÀÇ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®ÀÌ ¿Ï·áµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
    • ¼ºÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
    • ±âȸ
    • ÇØ°áÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °úÁ¦
  • ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®
  • Porter¡¯s Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTLE ºÐ¼®
    • Á¤Ä¡
    • °æÁ¦
    • »çȸ
    • ±â¼ú
    • ¹ý·ü
    • ȯ°æ

Á¦6Àå ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : Á¦°ø Á¦Ç°º°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • ¼­ºñ½º
    • ¸Å´ÏÁöµå ¼­ºñ½º
    • Àü¹® ¼­ºñ½º
      • °í°´ Áö¿ø
      • ¿Âº¸µù
      • SLA °ü¸®
      • Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ¹× ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ
  • ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î
    • ½Ã¼³ ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸®
    • ¸®½º °ü¸®
    • ¸¶ÄÉÆÃ ¹× ¼¼ÀÔÀÚ Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀ̼Ç
    • º¸°í¼­ ¹× ºÐ¼®
    • º¸¾È ¹× °áÁ¦

Á¦7Àå ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ¼ÒÀ¯ÀÚº°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • »ç³»
  • Á¦3ÀÚ

Á¦8Àå ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ¼ºÁúº°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • Àå±â °è¾à
  • ´Ü±â °è¾à

Á¦9Àå ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ¹°°Ç À¯Çüº°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • »ó¾÷¿ë
    • Ä·ÇÁÀå ¹× RV ÆÄÅ©
    • µ¥ÀÌÅͼ¾ÅÍ Çãºê ¹× Tech Parks
    • ±³À°±â°ü
    • ÀÇ·á±â°ü
    • ¹°·ù ¹× ¹è¼Û¼¾ÅÍ
    • ¿ÀÇǽº ¹× ÄÚ¿öÅ· ½ºÆäÀ̽º
    • ¼Ò¸ÅÁ¡
    • â°í
  • Á¤ºÎ ¹× ±º
    • ±¹¹æºÎ ½Ã¼³
    • ¿¬¹æ, ÁÖ ¹× Áö¹æÁ¤ºÎ û»ç
    • ¹ýÁýÇà ½Ã¼³
    • ±º ±âÁö ¹× ½Ã¼³
    • °ø¿µ ÁÖÅÃ ´ç±¹
  • »ê¾÷
    • °Ç¼³ ÇöÀå
    • ¿¡³ÊÁö ¹× À¯Æ¿¸®Æ¼
    • Á¦Á¶°ÅÁ¡
    • ¿¬±¸°³¹ß ½Ã¼³
  • º¹ÇÕ ÀÌ¿ë
  • ÁÖÅÃ
    • ¾ÆÆÄÆ®
    • °ÔÀÌÆ® Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ
    • Ÿ¿î ÇϿ콺
    • ºô¶ó/º¹ÇÕ

Á¦10Àå ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : Àü°³ Áö¿ªº°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • On-Cloud
  • On-Premise

Á¦11Àå ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : Áö¸®Àû À§Ä¡º°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • Áö¹æ
  • ±³¿Ü
  • µµ½Ã

Á¦12Àå ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ¹°°Ç ±Ô¸ðº°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • ´ë±Ô¸ð
  • Áß¼Ò±Ô¸ð

Á¦13Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå

  • ¼­·Ð
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ¹Ì±¹

Á¦14Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå

  • ¼­·Ð
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀϺ»
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • Çѱ¹
  • ´ë¸¸
  • ű¹
  • º£Æ®³²

Á¦15Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ºÎµ¿»ê °ü¸® ½ÃÀå

  • ¼­·Ð
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Çɶõµå
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ½ºÀ§½º
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • ¿µ±¹

Á¦16Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024³â
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024³â
  • °æÀï ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼®
  • Àü·« ºÐ¼®°ú Á¦¾È

±â¾÷ ¸®½ºÆ®

  • Accruent, LLC
  • AppFolio, Inc.
  • Aspire Systems
  • Avail
  • Avenue
  • Boom Properties
  • Bozzuto & Associates, Inc.
  • Breezeway Homes, Inc.
  • CBRE, Inc.
  • CDG Property Management
  • Colliers International Property Consultants, Inc.
  • CoreLogic, Inc.
  • Cortland
  • CoStar Group, Inc.
  • Credit Agricole S.A.
  • Cushman & Wakefield PLC
  • DoorLoop Inc.
  • Entrata, Inc.
  • Eptura, Inc.
  • Greystar Global Enterprise, LLC
  • HappyCo, Inc.
  • Hemlane, Inc.
  • Hines Group
  • Hitachi, Ltd.
  • Hive Properties
  • Hughes Group Limited
  • Inhabit
  • Innago, LLC
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • IQware Inc.
  • Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
  • LeaseHawk, LLC
  • LetHub
  • Lincoln Property Company
  • Livly, Inc
  • London Computer Systems
  • ManageCasa Inc.
  • Matterport, Inc.
  • MRI Software LLC
  • Mynd Management, Inc.
  • MyndLeaseX
  • Nexus Property Management
  • Ohmyhome Limited
  • Oracle Corporation
  • Planon Group
  • Property Boulevard, Inc.
  • Property Matrix
  • PURE Property Management Company
  • RealPage, Inc.
  • Realpha Asset Management, Inc.
  • Reapit Limited
  • Rentec Direct LLC
  • RentRedi, Inc.
  • ResMan, LLC
  • Roers Companies
  • Royal York Property Management Franchising, inc.
  • SAP SE
  • Savills PLC
  • Smart Property Systems Inc.
  • Spacewell International NV
  • Square Yards Group
  • Strangford Management Ltd
  • TenantCloud, LLC
  • Tribe Property Technologies Inc.
  • Trimble Inc.
  • TruHome Property Solutions
  • TurboTenant, Inc.
  • Yardi Systems, Inc.
  • Zumper, Inc.
LSH 25.05.23

The Property Management Market was valued at USD 29.69 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 32.65 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.96%, reaching USD 52.50 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 29.69 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 32.65 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 52.50 billion
CAGR (%) 9.96%

In the ever-evolving sphere of property management, maintaining efficiency while balancing innovation has become paramount. The industry, rooted in longstanding principles of asset oversight and operational management, is now experiencing rapid shifts driven by technological advancement, changing market dynamics, and evolving consumer expectations. As traditional methods yield to modern, more agile strategies, property managers are embracing digital tools and process optimizations that allow them to manage diverse portfolios more effectively.

This introductory overview sets the stage for an in-depth exploration of not only the progress made so far but also the strategic imperatives that will define tomorrow's market. Stakeholders are challenged to merge proven management techniques with pioneering solutions, creating a hybrid operational model that is both flexible and robust against external pressures. The interplay between cutting-edge software solutions and bespoke service offerings further emphasizes the need for adaptability. In today's competitive environment, understanding the drivers behind these shifts and anticipating future trends is essential to achieving sustained success and operational excellence.

Transformative Shifts in the Property Management Landscape

The property management landscape is undergoing significant transformation driven by the integration of advanced technologies and an evolving regulatory framework. Rapid digitization has spurred the adoption of innovative practices that streamline property operations and enhance tenant experiences. Emerging tools such as cloud-based platforms, mobile applications, and data analytics have redefined how asset managers monitor, maintain, and promote properties.

In parallel, regulatory changes and heightened accountability requirements have pushed industry participants to adopt more transparent and efficient practices. These shifts not only mitigate risk but also pave the way for higher operational standards and improved service delivery. As traditional methods give way to digital-first approaches, the industry benefits from reduced operational costs, increased responsiveness, and improved analytics capabilities. Moreover, the integration of smart technologies such as IoT sensors and automated maintenance systems is transforming everyday operations, ensuring real-time data collection and predictive maintenance that emphasizes both tenant safety and asset longevity. Collectively, these transformative changes are reshaping business models and establishing new benchmarks for success in the property management sector.

Key Segmentation Insights in the Evolving Property Management Market

A fine-grained examination of the market reveals a multi-layered segmentation approach that illuminates the diverse characteristics of the property management arena. The first segmentation, based on offering, distinguishes between services and software, where services are meticulously dissected into managed services and professional services. Within professional services, areas such as customer support, onboarding, SLA management, and training & consulting emerge as crucial elements, while the software component is analyzed across facility property management, lease management, marketing & tenant communication, reporting & analytics, and security & payments.

Further differentiation is achieved through ownership structure, categorizing operations as either in-house or third party, thereby shedding light on varying management approaches. An additional segmentation based on the contractual nature of properties divides the market into long-term contracts and short-term contracts. Property type segmentation further refines analysis into categories such as commercial, government & military, industrial, mixed use, and residential. For instance, the commercial segment itself is carefully segmented into specialized areas like campgrounds and RV parks, data centre hubs, educational and healthcare institutions, logistics & distribution centers, offices & co-working spaces, retail spaces, and warehouses; while the residential component is divided among apartments, gated communities, townhouses, and villas/compounds. Deployment preferences, either on-cloud or on-premise, along with geographic location criteria such as rural, suburban, and urban areas, and property size distinctions between large and small & medium properties, complete this comprehensive segmentation analysis.

Based on Offering, market is studied across Services and Software. The Services is further studied across Managed Services and Professional Services. The Professional Services is further studied across Customer Support, Onboarding, SLA Management, and Training & Consulting. The Software is further studied across Facility Property Management, Lease Management, Marketing & Tenant Communication, Reporting & Analytics, and Security & Payments.

Based on Ownership, market is studied across In-House and Third Party.

Based on Nature, market is studied across Long-Term Contracts and Short-Term Contracts.

Based on Property Type, market is studied across Commercial, Government & Military, Industrial, Mixed Use, and Residential. The Commercial is further studied across Campgrounds and RV Parks, Data Centre Hubs/Tech Parks, Educational Institutions, Healthcare Institutions, Logistics & Distribution Centers, Offices & Co-working Spaces, Retail Spaces, and Warehouses. The Government & Military is further studied across Department of Defense Facilities, Federal, State & Local Gov Office Buildings, Law Enforcement Facilities, Military Bases and Installations, and Public Housing Authorities. The Industrial is further studied across Construction Sites, Energy & Utilities, Manufacturing Sites, and R&D Facilities. The Residential is further studied across Apartments, Gated communities, Townhouses, and Villas/Compounds.

Based on Deployment, market is studied across On-Cloud and On-Premise.

Based on Geographic Location, market is studied across Rural, Suburban, and Urban.

Based on Property Size, market is studied across Large Properties and Small & Medium Properties.

Exploring Key Regional Dynamics Shaping Property Management

Market dynamics in property management vary significantly across different regions, each presenting a unique blend of challenges and opportunities that influence operational strategies. In the Americas, a highly competitive environment paired with rapid technological adoption has created a fertile ground for innovative property solutions. Traditional practices here are increasingly being augmented by digital innovations, leading to improved property oversight and tenant engagement.

Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, evolving regulatory standards and distinct cultural considerations necessitate a tailored approach that respects local practices while incorporating global trends. This region is characterized by a balanced blend of heritage management techniques and modern digital solutions that cater to varying property dimensions and service requirements. Meanwhile, the Asia-Pacific region stands out with its rapid urbanization and robust economic growth that drives significant investments in property development and management technologies. The diverse market conditions in these regions underscore the importance of localized strategies that address specific infrastructural demands, financial frameworks, and evolving customer expectations.

Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

Highlighting Industry Leaders and Prominent Innovators

In an industry marked by transformation and competitive differentiation, a number of key companies have emerged as leaders who are setting benchmarks in property management. Notable organizations such as Accruent, LLC, AppFolio, Inc., and Aspire Systems have been at the forefront of integrating innovative software and managed services that streamline the property management journey. Other influential names including Avail, Avenue, Boom Properties, and Bozzuto & Associates, Inc. have consistently demonstrated prowess in combining technology with customer-centric services to achieve operational excellence.

Further consolidating their influence are companies like Breezeway Homes, Inc., CBRE, Inc., CDG Property Management, and Colliers International Property Consultants, Inc. Their capabilities are complemented by industry stalwarts such as CoreLogic, Inc., Cortland, and CoStar Group, Inc., whose strategic initiatives continue to redefine operational benchmarks. Esteemed corporations ranging from Credit Agricole S.A., Cushman & Wakefield PLC, DoorLoop Inc., Entrata, Inc., Eptura, Inc., to Greystar Global Enterprise, LLC, exemplify market-leading practices. In addition, organizations such as HappyCo, Inc., Hemlane, Inc., and Hines Group remain pivotal, while globally recognized names including Hitachi, Ltd., Hive Properties, Hughes Group Limited, and Inhabit further contribute to a competitive yet innovative market landscape. Each of these companies brings distinct capabilities to the table, ensuring that the property management space continues to evolve through a blend of established expertise and forward-thinking strategies.

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Property Management Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Accruent, LLC, AppFolio, Inc., Aspire Systems, Avail, Avenue, Boom Properties, Bozzuto & Associates, Inc., Breezeway Homes, Inc., CBRE, Inc., CDG Property Management, Colliers International Property Consultants, Inc., CoreLogic, Inc., Cortland, CoStar Group, Inc., Credit Agricole S.A., Cushman & Wakefield PLC, DoorLoop Inc., Entrata, Inc., Eptura, Inc., Greystar Global Enterprise, LLC, HappyCo, Inc., Hemlane, Inc., Hines Group, Hitachi, Ltd., Hive Properties, Hughes Group Limited, Inhabit, Innago, LLC, International Business Machines Corporation, IQware Inc., Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated, LeaseHawk, LLC, LetHub, Lincoln Property Company, Livly, Inc, London Computer Systems, ManageCasa Inc., Matterport, Inc., MRI Software LLC, Mynd Management, Inc., MyndLeaseX, Nexus Property Management, Ohmyhome Limited, Oracle Corporation, Planon Group, Property Boulevard, Inc., Property Matrix, PURE Property Management Company, RealPage, Inc., Realpha Asset Management, Inc., Reapit Limited, Rentec Direct LLC, RentRedi, Inc., ResMan, LLC, Roers Companies, Royal York Property Management Franchising, inc., SAP SE, Savills PLC, Smart Property Systems Inc., Spacewell International NV, Square Yards Group, Strangford Management Ltd, TenantCloud, LLC, Tribe Property Technologies Inc., Trimble Inc., TruHome Property Solutions, TurboTenant, Inc., Yardi Systems, Inc., and Zumper, Inc.. Actionable Recommendations for Industry Leaders

Industry leaders must now embark on a path that combines strategic foresight with actionable insights to capitalize on the evolving market trends. First, investing in robust digital platforms that integrate both onsite and cloud-based solutions will be critical to streamline operations and enhance real-time decision-making. Leaders should prioritize seamless system integration that offers comprehensive reporting and analytics to drive tactical initiatives across all facets of property management.

Second, a renewed emphasis on customer-centric approaches is essential. By leveraging data analytics to gain a deeper understanding of tenant needs and preferences, organizations can tailor services that not only foster tenant satisfaction but also build long-term loyalty. In parallel, a balanced focus on both in-house and third-party management models will help optimize operational efficiencies while mitigating risks associated with resource allocation and compliance.

Finally, fostering a culture of continuous improvement through regular training and innovation will serve as a catalyst for sustainable growth. Embracing partnerships that provide access to expertise, technology, and market intelligence can further bolster a company's ability to adapt to rapid industry changes while ensuring consistent performance improvements.

Conclusion: Charting the Future Path in Property Management

The property management sector stands at a pivotal juncture where time-tested practices seamlessly blend with innovative advances. Through comprehensive segmentation analyses, the industry has shed light on the nuanced dynamics governing property offerings, contract structures, and deployment methods. Moreover, a deeper understanding of regional variations underscores the indispensability of localized strategies tailored to meet specific market demands.

The insightful exploration of key companies that are spearheading innovation alongside actionable recommendations for industry leaders reveals a clear trajectory toward an integrated, technology-driven future. Embracing these insights will aid decision-makers in not only navigating current market challenges but also in anticipating future shifts. In essence, the consolidation of advanced solutions with effective operational practices provides a robust framework that propels the industry forward, ensuring long-term sustainability and competitive advantage.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Market Dynamics
    • 5.1.1. Drivers
      • 5.1.1.1. Increasing demand for integrated facility management solutions across residential and commercial sectors
      • 5.1.1.2. Growing demand for rental properties in urban areas fueling the need for property management
      • 5.1.1.3. Rising trend of remote working altering property management needs and preferences globally
    • 5.1.2. Restraints
      • 5.1.2.1. Consumer perception issues limiting the adoption of property management
    • 5.1.3. Opportunities
      • 5.1.3.1. Innovations in AI-driven property management solutions to enhance tenant experience
      • 5.1.3.2. Increasing investments in sustainable technology upgrades to improve property efficiency and tenant retention
    • 5.1.4. Challenges
      • 5.1.4.1. Data privacy concerns associated with property management
  • 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
    • 5.2.1. Ownership: Utilization of in-house model for swift decision-making and tailored service
    • 5.2.2. Property Type: Growing preference for commercial properties due to growing demand for flexible office space
  • 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
  • 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
    • 5.4.1. Political
    • 5.4.2. Economic
    • 5.4.3. Social
    • 5.4.4. Technological
    • 5.4.5. Legal
    • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Property Management Market, by Offering

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Services
    • 6.2.1. Managed Services
    • 6.2.2. Professional Services
      • 6.2.2.1. Customer Support
      • 6.2.2.2. Onboarding
      • 6.2.2.3. SLA Management
      • 6.2.2.4. Training & Consulting
  • 6.3. Software
    • 6.3.1. Facility Property Management
    • 6.3.2. Lease Management
    • 6.3.3. Marketing & Tenant Communication
    • 6.3.4. Reporting & Analytics
    • 6.3.5. Security & Payments

7. Property Management Market, by Ownership

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. In-House
  • 7.3. Third Party

8. Property Management Market, by Nature

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Long-Term Contracts
  • 8.3. Short-Term Contracts

9. Property Management Market, by Property Type

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Commercial
    • 9.2.1. Campgrounds and RV Parks
    • 9.2.2. Data Centre Hubs/Tech Parks
    • 9.2.3. Educational Institutions
    • 9.2.4. Healthcare Institutions
    • 9.2.5. Logistics & Distribution Centers
    • 9.2.6. Offices & Co-working Spaces
    • 9.2.7. Retail Spaces
    • 9.2.8. Warehouses
  • 9.3. Government & Military
    • 9.3.1. Department of Defense Facilities
    • 9.3.2. Federal, State & Local Gov Office Buildings
    • 9.3.3. Law Enforcement Facilities
    • 9.3.4. Military Bases and Installations
    • 9.3.5. Public Housing Authorities
  • 9.4. Industrial
    • 9.4.1. Construction Sites
    • 9.4.2. Energy & Utilities
    • 9.4.3. Manufacturing Sites
    • 9.4.4. R&D Facilities
  • 9.5. Mixed Use
  • 9.6. Residential
    • 9.6.1. Apartments
    • 9.6.2. Gated communities
    • 9.6.3. Townhouses
    • 9.6.4. Villas/Compounds

10. Property Management Market, by Deployment

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. On-Cloud
  • 10.3. On-Premise

11. Property Management Market, by Geographic Location

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Rural
  • 11.3. Suburban
  • 11.4. Urban

12. Property Management Market, by Property Size

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Large Properties
  • 12.3. Small & Medium Properties

13. Americas Property Management Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Argentina
  • 13.3. Brazil
  • 13.4. Canada
  • 13.5. Mexico
  • 13.6. United States

14. Asia-Pacific Property Management Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. Australia
  • 14.3. China
  • 14.4. India
  • 14.5. Indonesia
  • 14.6. Japan
  • 14.7. Malaysia
  • 14.8. Philippines
  • 14.9. Singapore
  • 14.10. South Korea
  • 14.11. Taiwan
  • 14.12. Thailand
  • 14.13. Vietnam

15. Europe, Middle East & Africa Property Management Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. Denmark
  • 15.3. Egypt
  • 15.4. Finland
  • 15.5. France
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. Israel
  • 15.8. Italy
  • 15.9. Netherlands
  • 15.10. Nigeria
  • 15.11. Norway
  • 15.12. Poland
  • 15.13. Qatar
  • 15.14. Russia
  • 15.15. Saudi Arabia
  • 15.16. South Africa
  • 15.17. Spain
  • 15.18. Sweden
  • 15.19. Switzerland
  • 15.20. Turkey
  • 15.21. United Arab Emirates
  • 15.22. United Kingdom

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Rentvine secures USD 74 million growth capital from Mainsail Partners to innovate and expand its property management software
    • 16.3.2. El Batal Developments partners with JLL to enhance Rock Gold Mall's management efficiency
    • 16.3.3. Latch launches Door Property Management, acquiring The Broadway Company's business to enhance services and scale efficiently
    • 16.3.4. Habyt raises USD 42 Million for home and hotel rental platform in a startup funding roundup
    • 16.3.5. AppFolio unveils Realm-X, the property management industry's first-ever generative AI conversational interface
    • 16.3.6. Royal York Property Management receives official accreditations from Canadian financial institutions
    • 16.3.7. BLVD Residential expands relationship with Pagaya's Darwin Homes, adds 1,000 homes to Darwin's platform
    • 16.3.8. Entrata acquires Rent Dynamics, positioning it to transform how multifamily residents build credit and improve financial health
    • 16.3.9. MRI Software launches flexible property portal to drive tenant engagement
    • 16.3.10. Oracle teams with Wyndham to bring OPERA Cloud to 2,000 additional hotels
    • 16.3.11. LeaseHawk and Leading Rental Network Partner to enhance AI-powered listings for multifamily properties
    • 16.3.12. CoreLogic boosts its proptech powers with acquisition of digital real estate marketing firm Plezzel
    • 16.3.13. Rentec Direct upgrades portal in its property management software platform
    • 16.3.14. Hines launches its property management services offering in France
  • 16.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation
    • 16.4.1. RealPage, Inc.

Companies Mentioned

  • 1. Accruent, LLC
  • 2. AppFolio, Inc.
  • 3. Aspire Systems
  • 4. Avail
  • 5. Avenue
  • 6. Boom Properties
  • 7. Bozzuto & Associates, Inc.
  • 8. Breezeway Homes, Inc.
  • 9. CBRE, Inc.
  • 10. CDG Property Management
  • 11. Colliers International Property Consultants, Inc.
  • 12. CoreLogic, Inc.
  • 13. Cortland
  • 14. CoStar Group, Inc.
  • 15. Credit Agricole S.A.
  • 16. Cushman & Wakefield PLC
  • 17. DoorLoop Inc.
  • 18. Entrata, Inc.
  • 19. Eptura, Inc.
  • 20. Greystar Global Enterprise, LLC
  • 21. HappyCo, Inc.
  • 22. Hemlane, Inc.
  • 23. Hines Group
  • 24. Hitachi, Ltd.
  • 25. Hive Properties
  • 26. Hughes Group Limited
  • 27. Inhabit
  • 28. Innago, LLC
  • 29. International Business Machines Corporation
  • 30. IQware Inc.
  • 31. Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
  • 32. LeaseHawk, LLC
  • 33. LetHub
  • 34. Lincoln Property Company
  • 35. Livly, Inc
  • 36. London Computer Systems
  • 37. ManageCasa Inc.
  • 38. Matterport, Inc.
  • 39. MRI Software LLC
  • 40. Mynd Management, Inc.
  • 41. MyndLeaseX
  • 42. Nexus Property Management
  • 43. Ohmyhome Limited
  • 44. Oracle Corporation
  • 45. Planon Group
  • 46. Property Boulevard, Inc.
  • 47. Property Matrix
  • 48. PURE Property Management Company
  • 49. RealPage, Inc.
  • 50. Realpha Asset Management, Inc.
  • 51. Reapit Limited
  • 52. Rentec Direct LLC
  • 53. RentRedi, Inc.
  • 54. ResMan, LLC
  • 55. Roers Companies
  • 56. Royal York Property Management Franchising, inc.
  • 57. SAP SE
  • 58. Savills PLC
  • 59. Smart Property Systems Inc.
  • 60. Spacewell International NV
  • 61. Square Yards Group
  • 62. Strangford Management Ltd
  • 63. TenantCloud, LLC
  • 64. Tribe Property Technologies Inc.
  • 65. Trimble Inc.
  • 66. TruHome Property Solutions
  • 67. TurboTenant, Inc.
  • 68. Yardi Systems, Inc.
  • 69. Zumper, Inc.
»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦