½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1715480

¼¼°èÀÇ Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå : °Ë»ç ½ÃÇà À¯Çü, °Ë»ç À¯Çü, ±â¼ú À¯Çü, Á¦¾È ¸µ, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°-¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø 2025-2030³â

Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market by Testing Type, Test Type, Technology Type, Offering, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 194 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå 2024³â ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 7¾ï 8,019¸¸ ´Þ·¯, 2025³â¿¡´Â 8¾ï 7,374¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸£°í, CAGR 12.23%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 15¾ï 5,987¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ : 2024³â 7¾ï 8,019¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ : 2025³â 8¾ï 7,374¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ : 2030³â 15¾ï 5,987¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 12.23%

Âø»ó Àü À¯ÀüÇÐ °Ë»ç(PGT)´Â »ý½Ä ÀÇÇÐÀÇ Çõ½ÅÀÇ ÇÑ ÃàÀ¸·Î µîÀåÇÏ¿© Àΰ£ ¹ß´ÞÀÇ Ãʱ⠴ܰ迡¼­ Èñ¸Á°ú ¸íÈ®¼ºÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. À¯ÀüÀÚ ½ºÅ©¸®´× ¹× Áø´Ü ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î Âø»ó Àü¿¡ ÀáÀçÀûÀÎ À¯ÀüÀû ÀÌ»óÀ» ½Äº°ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾î À¯Àü ÁúȯÀÇ À§ÇèÀ» ÁÙÀÌ°í ´õ °Ç°­ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ º¸ÀåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹ßÀüÀº °³ÀÎ ¸ÂÃãÇü ÀÇ·á¿Í Ç¥Àû Áø´Ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â ½Ã´ë¿¡ ƯÈ÷ Áß¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

PGT ±â¼úÀÇ ÁøÈ­´Â °è¼Ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â ÀÓ»ó ¿¬±¸, °Ë»ç ±â¼úÀÇ Çâ»ó, »ý¸í°øÇÐ ±â¾÷°ú ÀÇ·á±â°üÀÇ Çù·Â °­È­¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÃËÁøµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ºÒÀÓ Å¬¸®´Ð°ú Áø´Ü ½ÇÇè½Ç ¸ðµÎ ÃÖ÷´Ü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç µµ±¸¸¦ µµÀÔÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó »óȲÀº ºü¸£°Ô ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀº Á¢±Ù¼º°ú È¿À²¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀΠȯ°æ¿¡¼­ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº źźÇÑ À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀ» ¸ð»öÇÏ°í ºÎ¸ð¿Í ¹è¾Æ À¯ÀüÇÐÀÇ ÃֽŠÁö½ÄÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÑ ÅëÇÕÀû Àü·«À» äÅÃÇÒ °ÍÀ» ±ÇÀåÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

µû¶ó¼­ ½ÃÀåÀº »ó½Â¼¼¸¦ Ÿ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¿¬±¸ ÀÌ´Ï¼ÅÆ¼ºê¸¦ °­È­ÇÏ¿© »ý½Ä ÀÇÇп¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸´Ù Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ Á¢±ÙÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¼úÀÌ ºñ¾àÀûÀ¸·Î ¹ßÀüÇÒ ¶§¸¶´Ù ºÒÀÓ Ä¡·áÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼º°ú ¼º°ø·ü Çâ»óÀº ÀÓ»óÀÇ¿Í È¯ÀÚ ¸ðµÎ¿¡°Ô Á¡Á¡ ´õ ½ÇÇö °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Âø»ó Àü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ º¯È­

ÃÖ±Ù ¸î ³â µ¿¾È Âø»ó Àü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ À±°ûÀ» ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇÏ´Â ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ º¯È­°¡ ÀϾ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¾÷°è´Â À¯ÀüÀÚ ½ºÅ©¸®´×ÀÇ Á¤È®¼º°ú ½Å·Ú¼ºÀ» Å©°Ô Çâ»ó½ÃŰ´Â ÃÖ÷´Ü ±â¼ú°ú ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¼ö¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿ª»çÀûÀ¸·Î Ç¥ÁØ ¼¼Æ÷À¯ÀüÇÐÀû ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇؿԴø ÀÌ ºÐ¾ß´Â ÀÌÁ¦ °íÇØ»óµµ À¯Àüü ÅøÀ» µµÀÔÇÏ¿© Áø´Ü Á¤È®µµ¿Í 󸮷®ÀÇ ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ ÀüȯÀ» ÁÖµµÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

°¡Àå ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ ¹ßÀü Áß Çϳª´Â Â÷¼¼´ë ¿°±â¼­¿­ ºÐ¼®±âÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ±â¼úÀº ¹Ì¼¼ÇÑ ¿°»öü ÀÌ»ó °ËÃâÀ» Çâ»ó½Ãų »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ¿©·¯ À¯ÀüÀÚ ÁúȯÀ» µ¿½Ã¿¡ ºñ±³ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Â Á¤È®µµ·Î °Ë»çÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô ÇØÁÝ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÁßÇÕÈ¿¼Ò¿¬¼â¹ÝÀÀ(PCR) ±â¹Ý °Ë»ç¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù Á¤±³ÇÑ À¯ÀüüÇÏÀ̺긮µ¥ÀÌ¼Ç ±â¼ú·ÎÀÇ ÁøÈ­´Â ÀÓ»óÀû ½Å·Ú¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÏ ¼ö Àִ ȯ°æÀ» Á¶¼ºÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°èÀûÀÎ ±ÔÁ¦ ü°èµµ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹ßÀü¿¡ ¸ÂÃß¾î º¯È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. »õ·Î¿î °¡À̵å¶óÀÎÀº À¯Àüü ¹«°á¼ºÀÇ Á߿伺°ú Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ̰í Ãæ½Çµµ ³ôÀº ÀÌ½Ä Àü °Ë»çÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ÀÎÁ¤Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, °ø°ø ¿¬±¸±â°ü°ú ¹Î°£ ±â¾÷°úÀÇ Çù·Â °ü°è °³¼±Àº »ê¾÷ Àü¹ÝÀÇ ½Ã³ÊÁö È¿°ú¸¦ °¡Á®¿Í ±â¼ú Çõ½Å¿¡ ¹ÚÂ÷¸¦ °¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ º¯È­ÀÇ °á°ú·Î ½ÃÀåÀº ´õ ³ôÀº À¯È¿¼º, ¸ÂÃãÇü Ä¡·á ¹æ¹ý, ȯÀÚ °á°ú °³¼±ÀÇ ½Ã´ë·Î ³ª¾Æ°¡°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ½Ä Àü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ÀλçÀÌÆ®

½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­¸¦ ÀÚ¼¼È÷ »ìÆìº¸¸é ´Ù¾çÇÑ °Ë»ç ±â¼ú, ÷´Ü ±â¼ú, ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÃÖÁ¾ ¿ëµµ¸¦ ¹Ý¿µÇÏ´Â ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ »óȲÀÌ µå·¯³³´Ï´Ù. °Ë»ç À¯Çüº° ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡¼­´Â ÀÌÇü¼º Á¶»ç¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â PGT-A, ´Ü¿ø¼º Àå¾Ö °ËÃâ¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃá PGT-M, ±¸Á¶Àû Àç¹è¿­À» ºÐ¼®Çϵµ·Ï ¼³°èµÈ PGT-SR¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ½ÃÀåÀ» Á¶»çÇß½À´Ï´Ù. °¢ Ä«Å×°í¸®´Â È¿°úÀûÀÎ Áø´Ü¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ Æ¯À̼º°ú Á¤È®µµ¿¡ µû¶ó °íÀ¯ÇÑ °úÁ¦¿Í ±âȸ¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ, °Ë»ç À¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ ±¸ºÐÀº ÁÖ·Î °íÀ§Çè ºÎºÎÀÇ ¾Ë·ÁÁø À¯ÀüÀû ÀÌ»ó ¶Ç´Â ¿°»öü ÀÌ»óÀ» °¨ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â Âø»ó Àü À¯ÀüÀÚ Áø´Ü°ú ¹è¾ÆÀÇ ÀáÀçÀû À¯ÀüÀû ÀÌ»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸´Ù ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ Á¶»ç¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â Âø»ó Àü À¯ÀüÀÚ ½ºÅ©¸®´×À» ±¸ºÐÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ µÎ °¡Áö Á¢±Ù¹ýÀ» ÅëÇØ ´Ù¾çÇÑ À¯ÀüÀû ÁúȯÀ» È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î ¼±º°ÇÏ°í ´Ù¾çÇÑ È¯ÀÚÀÇ ¿ä±¸¿¡ ¸Â´Â ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±â¼ú ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­´Â ºñ±³ À¯Àüü ÇÏÀ̺긮µåÈ­ ¹× Çü±¤ in-situ ÇÏÀ̺긮µåÈ­¿¡¼­ Â÷¼¼´ë ½ÃÄö½Ì, PCR ±â¹Ý °Ë»ç, ´ÜÀÏ¿°±â´ÙÇü¼º ºÐ¼®¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ´Ù¾çÇÑ ±â¹ýÀ» ¾Æ¿ì¸£´Â ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀº À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç¹ýÀÇ Á¤È®¼º, È®À强, °æÁ¦¼ºÀ» Å©°Ô Çâ»ó½ÃÄ×½À´Ï´Ù. °í¼º´É ±â¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÁ¸µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó Áø´Ü Á¤È®µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁ³À» »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó °úÇÐÀû Çõ½ÅÀÇ ±æÀ» ¿­¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ Áß¿äÇÑ Ãø¸éÀº ±â±â, ½Ã¾à, ¼Ò¸ðǰ, Àü¿ë ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¶ó´Â ·»Á ÅëÇØ ½ÃÀåÀ» ¸é¹ÐÈ÷ Á¶»çÇÏ´Â Á¦Ç°º° ¼¼ºÐÈ­ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò´Â °Ë»ç ÇÁ·Î¼¼½ºÀÇ ÁßÃ߸¦ Çü¼ºÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, °¢ ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀº ÀÚµ¿È­ ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®ÀÇ Áøº¸µÈ Ãß¼¼¸¦ µÞ¹ÞħÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ º¼ ¶§, ½ÃÀåÀº Áø´Ü ½ÇÇè½Ç, ºÒÀÓ Å¬¸®´Ð, º´¿ø, ¿¬±¸ ±â°üÀ¸·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­µË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ »ç¾÷ü°¡ ÀÓ»óÀû È¿À²¼º°ú ±â¼úÀû Á¤±³ÇÔÀÇ ±ÕÇüÀ» Á¡Á¡ ´õ Ãß±¸ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó PGT ±â¼úÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» °­È­ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´Ù°¢ÀûÀÎ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌÇØÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº ½ÃÀå µ¿ÇâÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí, Àü·«ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÚ¿øÀ» ¹èºÐÇϰí, »ý½Ä ÀÇ·áÀÇ ÇÙ½É ºÎ¹®¿¡¼­ Çõ½ÅÀ» ÃËÁøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
    • ¼ºÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
    • ±âȸ
    • ÇØ°áÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °úÁ¦
  • ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®
  • Porter¡¯s Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTLE ºÐ¼®
    • Á¤Ä¡
    • °æÁ¦
    • »çȸ
    • ±â¼ú
    • ¹ý·ü
    • ȯ°æ

Á¦6Àå Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå : °Ë»ç ½ÃÇà À¯Çüº°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • PGT-A (Aneuploidy)
  • PGT-M (Monogenic Disorders)
  • PGT-SR (Structural Rearrangements)

Á¦7Àå Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå : °Ë»ç À¯Çüº°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ Áø´Ü
  • Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ ½ºÅ©¸®´×

Á¦8Àå Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå : ±â¼ú À¯Çüº°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • Comparative Genomic Hybridization
  • Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization
  • Â÷¼¼´ë ½ÃÄö½Ì
  • PCR °Ë»ç
  • Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism

Á¦9Àå Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå : Á¦°ø Á¦Ç°º°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • ±â±â
  • ½Ã¾à ¹× ¼Ò¸ðǰ
  • ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î

Á¦10Àå Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • ¼­·Ð
  • Áø´Ü½ÇÇè½Ç
  • ºÒÀÓÄ¡·á Ŭ¸®´Ð
  • º´¿ø
  • ¿¬±¸±â°ü

Á¦11Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå

  • ¼­·Ð
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ¹Ì±¹

Á¦12Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå

  • ¼­·Ð
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀϺ»
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • Çѱ¹
  • ´ë¸¸
  • ű¹
  • º£Æ®³²

Á¦13Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ Âø»óÀü À¯ÀüÀÚ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå

  • ¼­·Ð
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Çɶõµå
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ½ºÀ§½º
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • ¿µ±¹

Á¦14Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024³â
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024³â
  • °æÀï ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼®
  • Àü·« ºÐ¼®°ú Á¦¾È

±â¾÷ ¸®½ºÆ®

  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Agilent Technologies, Inc.
  • Bio-Techne Corporation
  • Bioarray S.L.
  • EUROPE IVF International s.r.o.
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
  • Genea Limited
  • GENETiKS
  • Illumina, Inc.
  • Invicta Genetics
  • Invitae Corporation
  • Juno Genetics, US Inc.
  • Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
  • MedGenome Labs Ltd.
  • Merck KGaA
  • Natera, Inc.
  • NextGen Genetics Holdings, LLC
  • Ovation Fertility
  • PacGenomics
  • PerkinElmer, Inc.
  • Progyny, Inc.
  • Qiagen N.V.
  • Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
  • Reproductive Genetic Innovations, LLC
  • SEQUENCE46, LLC
  • Sysmex Corporation
  • Takara Bio Inc.
  • The Cooper Companies Inc.
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Vitrolife Sweden AB
  • Yikon Genomics(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
LSH

The Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market was valued at USD 780.19 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 873.74 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 12.23%, reaching USD 1,559.87 million by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 780.19 million
Estimated Year [2025] USD 873.74 million
Forecast Year [2030] USD 1,559.87 million
CAGR (%) 12.23%

Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) has emerged as a transformative pillar in reproductive medicine, offering hope and clarity at the earliest stages of human development. Advances in genetic screening and diagnostic techniques have made it possible to identify potential genetic anomalies before implantation, thereby mitigating the risk of inherited disorders and ensuring healthier outcomes. This development is particularly significant in an era where the demand for personalized medicine and targeted diagnostics is intensifying.

The evolution in PGT technologies is driven by an ever-growing body of clinical research, improvements in laboratory techniques, and increased collaboration among biotechnology firms and healthcare institutions. As both fertility clinics and diagnostic laboratories incorporate state-of-the-art genetic screening tools, the landscape is evolving rapidly, with innovation leading to greater accessibility and efficiency. In this dynamic environment, stakeholders are encouraged to explore robust genetic testing protocols and adopt integrative strategies that leverage the latest insights in parental and embryonic genetics.

The market has thus witnessed an upward trajectory, bolstering research initiatives and enabling a more comprehensive approach to reproductive health. With each technological breakthrough, the promise of improved safety and higher success rates in fertility treatments becomes increasingly attainable for clinicians and patients alike.

Transformative Shifts in the Preimplantation Genetic Testing Landscape

Recent years have seen a series of transformative shifts that have redefined the contours of the preimplantation genetic testing market. The industry has embraced cutting-edge technologies and methodologies that have significantly improved the precision and reliability of genetic screenings. Historically reliant on standard cytogenetic techniques, the field has now incorporated high-resolution genomic tools, leading to a paradigm shift in diagnostic accuracy and throughput.

One of the most notable advancements has been the integration of next-generation sequencing. This technology not only enhances the detection of minor chromosomal aberrations but also enables simultaneous testing for multiple genetic conditions with unmatched precision. Additionally, the evolution from traditional polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based testing to more sophisticated genomic hybridization techniques has fostered an environment of enhanced clinical reliability.

Regulatory frameworks on a global scale are also shifting to accommodate these advancements. Newer guidelines are increasingly acknowledging the importance of genomic integrity and the necessity for comprehensive, high-fidelity preimplantation testing. Furthermore, improved collaboration between public research institutions and private enterprises has led to industry-wide synergy, spurring further innovation. The resulting paradigm shifts have, therefore, propelled the market towards an era of higher efficacy, tailored treatment modalities, and improved patient outcomes.

Key Segmentation Insights of the Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market

An in-depth examination of market segmentation reveals a nuanced landscape reflective of diverse testing techniques, advanced technologies, and varied end-use applications. The segmentation based on testing type examines the market across PGT-A, which targets aneuploidy investigation, PGT-M focused on monogenic disorder detection, and PGT-SR, designed to analyze structural rearrangements. Each category illustrates unique challenges and opportunities, driven by the specificity and accuracy required for effective diagnosis.

Furthermore, the division based on test type differentiates between preimplantation genetic diagnosis, primarily employed for detecting known genetic or chromosomal anomalies in high-risk couples, and preimplantation genetic screening, which provides a broader survey of potential genetic irregularities in embryos. This dual approach ensures that a wide range of genetic conditions can be effectively screened, offering tailored solutions for diverse patient needs.

In the realm of technology, the market segmentation covers an array of methodologies, from comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescent in-situ hybridization to next-generation sequencing, PCR-based testing, and single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Advancements in these methods have significantly elevated the precision, scalability, and affordability of genetic testing procedures. The growing reliance on high-throughput technologies has not only enhanced diagnostic accuracy but has also paved the way for further scientific innovations.

Another critical aspect is the segmentation based on offerings, which scrutinizes the market through the lens of instruments, reagents and consumables, and specialized software. These components form the backbone of the testing process, and advancements in each segment underscore the progressive trends in automation and data analytics.

Finally, when considering the end-user perspective, the market is studied across diagnostic laboratories, fertility clinics, hospitals, and research institutes. This segmentation reinforces the wide adoption of PGT technologies, as diverse entities increasingly seek to balance clinical efficiency with technological sophistication. By understanding these multifaceted segmentation models, stakeholders can ascertain market trends, allocate resources strategically, and drive further innovation within this critical area of reproductive medicine.

Based on Testing Type, market is studied across PGT-A (Aneuploidy), PGT-M (Monogenic Disorders), and PGT-SR (Structural Rearrangements).

Based on Test Type, market is studied across Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Preimplantation Genetic Screening.

Based on Technology Type, market is studied across Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization, Next-Generation Sequencing, PCR-Based Testing, and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism.

Based on Offering, market is studied across Instruments, Reagents & Consumables, and Software.

Based on End User, market is studied across Diagnostic Laboratories, Fertility Clinics, Hospitals, and Research Institutes.

Key Regional Insights of the Global Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market

The regional dynamics of the preimplantation genetic testing market reveal a rich tapestry of growth patterns, regulatory environments, and technological adoption across various geographical areas. In the Americas, a combination of robust healthcare infrastructure, significant investments in biotechnology, and progressive public health policies has resulted in rapid market expansion. The region represents a hub of clinical excellence and technological adoption, making it one of the most dynamic players in the global scenario.

Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, the market is characterized by a balanced mix of established healthcare systems and emerging markets. Here, stringent regulatory standards coupled with a surge in demand for precision diagnostics drive advancements and innovation. This area, while facing varied challenges, also presents significant opportunities through public-private partnerships and enhanced cross-border collaborations, which act as catalysts for market growth.

In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid urbanization, increasing awareness about reproductive health, and soaring investments in healthcare technologies have contributed to a vibrant market landscape. The convergence of technological know-how and increased demand for elite medical services has made this region a fertile ground for the adoption of preimplantation genetic testing. As healthcare systems in these regions continue to evolve, the market is anticipated to benefit from an influx of new players and innovative diagnostic solutions, further reinforcing its potential on the global stage.

Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

Key Companies Shaping the Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market

The competitive landscape in the preimplantation genetic testing market is marked by a diverse array of global players, each contributing to the rapid evolution of diagnostic technologies and clinical methodologies. Companies such as Abbott Laboratories and Agilent Technologies, Inc. have been front-runners, leveraging extensive research and innovation to deliver advanced genetic testing solutions. Their efforts are complemented by the expertise of organizations like Bio-Techne Corporation and Bioarray S.L., who continue to push the envelope in assay development and genomic analytics.

Emerging as significant competitors, enterprises such as EUROPE IVF International s.r.o., F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, and Genea Limited have established a formidable presence in the sector through integrated platforms that combine clinical diagnostics with next-generation sequencing. GENETiKS, Illumina, Inc., and Invicta Genetics have further revolutionized the market by streamlining data analysis and enhancing the precision of genetic screenings.

Invitae Corporation and Juno Genetics, US Inc. are noteworthy for their contributions in facilitating accessible genetic diagnostics, while Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and MedGenome Labs Ltd. have been instrumental in bridging the gap between cutting-edge research and clinical application. In addition, established giants such as Merck KGaA, Natera, Inc., and NextGen Genetics Holdings, LLC have strategically expanded their service portfolios to include a range of sophisticated genetic testing options.

Alongside these, companies like Ovation Fertility, PacGenomics, PerkinElmer, Inc., and Progyny, Inc. have garnered significant attention for their innovations in fertility-focused genetic diagnostics. Qiagen N.V., Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, and Reproductive Genetic Innovations, LLC have further fortified the market with robust testing solutions, while SEQUENCE46, LLC, Sysmex Corporation, Takara Bio Inc., and The Cooper Companies Inc. lead efforts in integrating software advancements with biological testing. Not to be overlooked, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Vitrolife Sweden AB, and Yikon Genomics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. round out a competitive landscape where collaborative innovation drives both technological improvements and market penetration.

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Abbott Laboratories, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Bio-Techne Corporation, Bioarray S.L., EUROPE IVF International s.r.o., F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Genea Limited, GENETiKS, Illumina, Inc., Invicta Genetics, Invitae Corporation, Juno Genetics, US Inc., Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, MedGenome Labs Ltd., Merck KGaA, Natera, Inc., NextGen Genetics Holdings, LLC, Ovation Fertility, PacGenomics, PerkinElmer, Inc., Progyny, Inc., Qiagen N.V., Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, Reproductive Genetic Innovations, LLC, SEQUENCE46, LLC, Sysmex Corporation, Takara Bio Inc., The Cooper Companies Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Vitrolife Sweden AB, and Yikon Genomics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.. Actionable Recommendations for Industry Leaders

For industry leaders seeking to navigate the evolving landscape of preimplantation genetic testing successfully, several actionable recommendations stand out. One key strategy is to prioritize investment in research and development. By allocating resources to advanced genomic technologies, companies can not only enhance diagnostic accuracy but also pioneer breakthrough applications that address emerging clinical needs. Embracing innovation in next-generation sequencing and complementary technologies can facilitate the creation of more robust, user-friendly testing platforms.

Moreover, fostering collaborative partnerships between diagnostic laboratories, research institutions, and clinical service providers will be crucial in accelerating product development and streamlining regulatory pathways. Industry leaders should also focus on integrating digital solutions and artificial intelligence to optimize both data management and interpretation. By doing so, the process of genomic analysis can be made more efficient, leading to faster turnaround times and more personalized patient care.

Another critical recommendation is to enhance market penetration through strategic geographic expansion. By investing in regions with high growth potential, such as emerging markets in the Asia-Pacific and the rapidly evolving sectors in Europe, Middle East, and Africa, companies can tap into an expanding customer base. Aligning product lines with local regulatory frameworks and clinical needs will further ensure that innovations are well received in diverse markets.

Finally, it is imperative to maintain stringent quality control measures and adhere to international regulatory standards. This not only instills confidence among end-users but also fosters a competitive environment based on safety, accuracy, and superior clinical outcomes. By implementing these recommendations, industry leaders can position themselves at the forefront of an increasingly competitive and technologically advanced market.

Conclusion: The Future of Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Preimplantation genetic testing is positioned at the crossroads of rapid technological evolution and pressing clinical demand. The market is thriving due to substantial advancements in genomic technology and a clearer understanding of genetic disorders that affect reproductive health. With transformative shifts in testing methodologies and an expansive segmentation framework covering various technological and application-based arenas, the market stands to benefit from both incremental and disruptive innovations.

Globally, the market is supported by vigorous regional dynamics, with significant growth observed in the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Each of these regions offers unique opportunities based on their regulatory frameworks, economic environments, and healthcare infrastructures. As innovative companies continue to push boundaries, the landscape has become increasingly competitive, encouraging continuous improvement and cross-sector collaboration.

Ultimately, the future of preimplantation genetic testing is one marked by increased accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility. The cumulative effect of technological advancements, broader market segmentation, and proactive regional expansion strategies promises to redefine reproductive health care. Stakeholders who embrace these trends and invest in future-focused strategies are likely to reap substantial long-term benefits, driving both improved patient outcomes and sustainable market growth.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Market Dynamics
    • 5.1.1. Drivers
      • 5.1.1.1. Improving healthcare infrastructure and easier access to genetic testing facilities worldwide
      • 5.1.1.2. Growing demand for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures requiring preimplantation genetic testing
      • 5.1.1.3. Increasing awareness about genetic disorders and their prevention among prospective parents
    • 5.1.2. Restraints
      • 5.1.2.1. High costs of preimplantation genetic testing procedures limiting widespread accessibility and adoption
    • 5.1.3. Opportunities
      • 5.1.3.1. Technological advancements enhancing accuracy and speed in preimplantation genetic testing
      • 5.1.3.2. Collaborations with IVF clinics to offer bundled preimplantation genetic testing services
    • 5.1.4. Challenges
      • 5.1.4.1. Compliance with different regional regulations and ethical standards
  • 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
    • 5.2.1. Testing Type: Increasing need for PGT-M to prevent transmitting hereditary conditions
    • 5.2.2. End User: Growing utilization of preimplantation genetic testing in fertility clinics to enhance the success rates of in vitro fertilization
  • 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
  • 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
    • 5.4.1. Political
    • 5.4.2. Economic
    • 5.4.3. Social
    • 5.4.4. Technological
    • 5.4.5. Legal
    • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market, by Testing Type

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. PGT-A (Aneuploidy)
  • 6.3. PGT-M (Monogenic Disorders)
  • 6.4. PGT-SR (Structural Rearrangements)

7. Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market, by Test Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
  • 7.3. Preimplantation Genetic Screening

8. Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market, by Technology Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Comparative Genomic Hybridization
  • 8.3. Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization
  • 8.4. Next-Generation Sequencing
  • 8.5. PCR-Based Testing
  • 8.6. Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism

9. Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market, by Offering

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Instruments
  • 9.3. Reagents & Consumables
  • 9.4. Software

10. Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market, by End User

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Diagnostic Laboratories
  • 10.3. Fertility Clinics
  • 10.4. Hospitals
  • 10.5. Research Institutes

11. Americas Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Argentina
  • 11.3. Brazil
  • 11.4. Canada
  • 11.5. Mexico
  • 11.6. United States

12. Asia-Pacific Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Australia
  • 12.3. China
  • 12.4. India
  • 12.5. Indonesia
  • 12.6. Japan
  • 12.7. Malaysia
  • 12.8. Philippines
  • 12.9. Singapore
  • 12.10. South Korea
  • 12.11. Taiwan
  • 12.12. Thailand
  • 12.13. Vietnam

13. Europe, Middle East & Africa Preimplantation Genetic Testing Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Denmark
  • 13.3. Egypt
  • 13.4. Finland
  • 13.5. France
  • 13.6. Germany
  • 13.7. Israel
  • 13.8. Italy
  • 13.9. Netherlands
  • 13.10. Nigeria
  • 13.11. Norway
  • 13.12. Poland
  • 13.13. Qatar
  • 13.14. Russia
  • 13.15. Saudi Arabia
  • 13.16. South Africa
  • 13.17. Spain
  • 13.18. Sweden
  • 13.19. Switzerland
  • 13.20. Turkey
  • 13.21. United Arab Emirates
  • 13.22. United Kingdom

14. Competitive Landscape

  • 14.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 14.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 14.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
    • 14.3.1. Successful PGT-HLA procedure at Jindal IVF offers hope for families facing genetic challenges
    • 14.3.2. Strategic GenEmbryomics and Progenesis partnership pioneers IVF testing with groundbreaking genetic innovations
    • 14.3.3. Natera Inc. to acquire prenatal and carrier screening assets from Invitae, to enhance patient services and market position
    • 14.3.4. Thermo Fisher Scientific launches advanced sequencing tools for preimplantation genetic testing, enhancing fertility research and reproductive health outcomes
    • 14.3.5. Medicover Genetics and Fimlab Laboratories Announce Partnership to Provide Genetic Testing Services in Finland
    • 14.3.6. U.S. Fertility and Ovation Combine to Create IVF Services Powerhouse, Increasing Access to Fertility Services
    • 14.3.7. Eurofins Genoma Announces Launch of niPGT-A, a Non-Invasive, Embryo Biopsy Free, Preimplantation Genetic Aneuploidy Screening
    • 14.3.8. GenEmbryomics Introduces the Most Complete IVF Genetic Test Ever Made Available
    • 14.3.9. Singaporeans Undergoing IVF to Get New Funding For Some Types of Preimplantation Genetic Testing
    • 14.3.10. Australia's Fertilis Raised USD 2 Million to Automate IVF Embryo Culturing
  • 14.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation

Companies Mentioned

  • 1. Abbott Laboratories
  • 2. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
  • 3. Bio-Techne Corporation
  • 4. Bioarray S.L.
  • 5. EUROPE IVF International s.r.o.
  • 6. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
  • 7. Genea Limited
  • 8. GENETiKS
  • 9. Illumina, Inc.
  • 10. Invicta Genetics
  • 11. Invitae Corporation
  • 12. Juno Genetics, US Inc.
  • 13. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
  • 14. MedGenome Labs Ltd.
  • 15. Merck KGaA
  • 16. Natera, Inc.
  • 17. NextGen Genetics Holdings, LLC
  • 18. Ovation Fertility
  • 19. PacGenomics
  • 20. PerkinElmer, Inc.
  • 21. Progyny, Inc.
  • 22. Qiagen N.V.
  • 23. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
  • 24. Reproductive Genetic Innovations, LLC
  • 25. SEQUENCE46, LLC
  • 26. Sysmex Corporation
  • 27. Takara Bio Inc.
  • 28. The Cooper Companies Inc.
  • 29. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • 30. Vitrolife Sweden AB
  • 31. Yikon Genomics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦