½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1715781

ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°, Á¾¾ç À¯Çüº°, ¿¬±¸ À¯Çüº°, ÀÌ½Ä ¹æ¹ýº°, ¿ëµµº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market by Type, Tumor Type, Study Type, Implantation Method, Application, End-User - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 189 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀåÀÇ 2023³â ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 3¾ï 8,338¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î, 2024³â¿¡´Â 4¾ï 2,904¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ¼ºÀåÇϸç, CAGRÀº 12.27%, 2030³â¿¡´Â 8¾ï 6,231¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ¿¬µµ 2023 3¾ï 8,338¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤¿¬µµ 2024 4¾ï 2,904¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø¿¬µµ 2030 8¾ï 6,231¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 12.27%

ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ÀÌ½Ä ¸ðµ¨À̶ó´Â ¹ßÀüÀûÀÎ ºÐ¾ß´Â ÀüÀÓ»ó ¿¬±¸¿Í ÀǾàǰ °³¹ßÀÇ ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀ» Å©°Ô ¹Ù²Ù¾î ³õ¾Ò½À´Ï´Ù. Àΰ£ Á¾¾ç Á¶Á÷À» ¸é¿ª°áÇÌ µ¿¹°¿¡ À̽ÄÇÏ´Â ÀÌ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ Á¢±Ù¹ýÀº ¹ø¿ª Á¾¾çÇп¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ Åø·Î ºü¸£°Ô ¹ßÀüÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¹æ¹ýÀº Àΰ£ÀÇ Á¾¾ç ¹Ì¼¼È¯°æÀ» ¸ð¹æÇÏ´Â ´É·ÂÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃÄÑ Ä¡·á È¿°ú¿Í ¾à¹° ³»¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±ÍÁßÇÑ Ç÷§ÆûÀ» Á¦°øÇÑ´Ù´Â Á¡¿¡¼­ ³ôÀº Æò°¡¸¦ ¹Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Àü ¼¼°è°¡ ¸ÂÃãÇü ÀÇ·á·Î Á¡Á¡ ´õ À̵¿Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, PDX ¸ðµ¨Àº ±âÁ¸ ü¿Ü ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ÇѰ踦 ¿ÏÈ­ÇÒ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó º¹ÀâÇÑ ¾Ï »ý¹°Çп¡ ´ëÇÑ ´õ ±íÀº ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±æÀ» ¿­¾îÁÙ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿ëµµ¿¡¼­ PDX ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â ¿ª»çÀû ¹è°æ, ±âÃÊ °úÇÐ ¹× ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇп¡ ´ëÇØ »ìÆìº¾´Ï´Ù. ¾ö°ÝÇÑ °úÇÐÀû ޱ¸¿Í ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ °áÇÕÇÑ ½ÉÃþ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ µ¶ÀÚµéÀº PDX ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ º¹ÀâÇÑ ´µ¾Ó½º¸¦ ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ¿Í ºÐ¼®Àû ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©ÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀ» ÅëÇØ Àü¹®°¡¿Í ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ÀÚ´Â ±âÁ¸ °úÁ¦¿Í »õ·Î¿î ±âȸ¸¦ È®½ÇÈ÷ ÀÌÇØÇϰí, ÀÌ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ »ý¹° ÀÇÇÐ ¿¬±¸ ºÐ¾ß¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ Çõ½Å°ú ÅõÀÚ¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¹ßÆÇÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀåÀÇ º¯È­

ÃÖ±Ù ¼ö³â°£ ±â¼ú Çõ½Å, ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©, º¸´Ù ¿¹Ãø °¡´ÉÇÑ ÀüÀÓ»ó½ÃÇè ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ²ÙÁØÇÑ ¼ö¿ä·Î ÀÎÇØ PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå¿¡ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ º¯È­°¡ ÀϾ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­´Â ±âÁ¸ ¼¼Æ÷ÁÖ ±â¹Ý ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ´ÜÁ¡°ú Àΰ£ Á¾¾ç »ý¹°ÇÐÀ» Ãæ½ÇÇÏ°Ô ÀçÇöÇÏ´Â ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àý½ÇÇÑ Çʿ伺¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνĿ¡ »Ñ¸®¸¦ µÎ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. À¯Àü°øÇаú À̹Ì¡ ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î PDX ¿¬±¸ÀÇ Á¤È®¼º°ú ÀçÇö¼ºÀÌ ´õ¿í °­È­µÇ¾î º¹ÀâÇÑ Á¾¾çÇÐÀÇ °úÁ¦¸¦ ±Øº¹ÇÒ ¼ö Àִ üÁ¦°¡ Çй®Àû, »ê¾÷Àû ¿¬±¸ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ¸¶·ÃµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå ±â¾÷Àº °í±Þ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®°ú ½Ç½Ã°£ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀ» °áÇÕÇÑ ÅëÇÕ Ç÷§ÆûÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ä¡·á ¹ÝÀÀ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü·Ê ¾ø´Â ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ½ÇÇè ¿öÅ©Ç÷ο츦 °£¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ°í ½Ã°£°ú ºñ¿ëÀ» Àý°¨ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÁßÁ¡À» µÎ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±× °á°ú »õ·Î¿î ¾ÏÁ¾°ú Ä¡·á¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÎøÇÑ ´ëÀÀÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿¬±¸ÀÚµéÀÌ È¯ÀÚ °³°³ÀÎÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ¿¡ ¸Â°Ô Ä¡·á¹ýÀ» Á¶Á¤Çϱâ À§ÇØ ²÷ÀÓ¾øÀÌ ³ë·ÂÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ½ÃÀåÀº ¸ÂÃãÇü ÀÇ·á·Î Å©°Ô ÀüȯµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­´Â ÀüÀÓ»ó Æò°¡¿¡¼­ ´õ ³ôÀº Á¤È®¼ºÀ» ¿ä±¸ÇÒ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ¿¬±¸±â°ü, »ý¸í°øÇÐ ±â¾÷, ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹ °£ÀÇ °ß°íÇÑ Çù·Â °ü°è¸¦ ÇÊ¿ä·Î Çϸç, ±Ã±ØÀûÀ¸·Î ¾Ï ¿¬±¸¿Í ÀǾàǰ °³¹ßÀÇ »õ·Î¿î Ç¥ÁØÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÒ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ÁÖ¿ä ºÎ¹®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®

PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼¼ºÐÈ­¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÇöÀç ¾÷°è µ¿Çâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ¸íÈ®ÇÑ ÆÐÅÏÀÌ ¹àÇôÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. À¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÐ¼®Àº ¸¶¿ì½º ¸ðµ¨°ú Áã ¸ðµ¨À» ±¸ºÐÇÏ°í °¢ µ¿¹° ¸ðµ¨°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ´µ¾Ó½º¿Í ƯÁ¤ ÀÌÁ¡À» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¾¾ç À¯ÇüÀ̶ó´Â ·»Á ÅëÇØ ¼ÒÈ­±â¾Ï, ºÎÀΰú¾Ï, Ç÷¾×¾Ï, È£Èí±â¾Ï, ºñ´¢±â¾Ï µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¾ÏÀ» Á¶»çÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÓ»ó»ó¿¡ ³»ÀçµÈ ÀÌÁú¼º¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡´Â »ýü ¿Ü, »ýü ³», »ýü³» °¢ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ Æ÷ÇԵǸç, °¢°¢ Àΰ£ÀÇ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû ¹ÝÀÀÀ» ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÇÒ ¶§ °íÀ¯ÇÑ °­Á¡À» ¹ßÈÖÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÌ½Ä ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó ¸ðµ¨À» ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇè °á°úÀÇ Å¸´ç¼º°ú Á¤È®¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÌ´Â µ¥ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, À̼Ҽº, µ¿¼Ò¼º, ÇÇÇÏ Á¢±Ù¹ýÀÌ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±âÃÊ ¾Ï ¿¬±¸, ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸¶Ä¿ Ž»ö, À¯Àüü ¹× ºÐÀÚ ¿¬±¸, ¸ÂÃãÇü ÀÇ·á, ÀüÀÓ»ó ¾à¹° Æò°¡, Á¾¾ç ¹Ì¼¼È¯°æ ºÐ¼® µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ Ȱ¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Çмú¿¬±¸±â°ü, ¾Ï ¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ, Á¦¾à ¹× ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÅ×Å©³î·¯Áö ±â¾÷Àº °¢°¢ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ½ÃÇè, °ËÁõ, ÃÖÁ¾ ÀÓ»ó Àû¿ë¿¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ´ã´çÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´Ù¸éÀûÀÎ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀº ÀÌ ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÎ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ ¿¬±¸ Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼÀÇ Àü¹®¼ºÀÇ ±íÀÌ¿Í »óÈ£ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀ» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå °³¿ä

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
    • ¼ºÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
    • ±âȸ
    • ÇØ°áÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °úÁ¦
  • ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®
  • Porter¡¯s Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTLE ºÐ¼®
    • Á¤Ä¡
    • °æÁ¦
    • »çȸ
    • ±â¼ú
    • ¹ý·ü
    • ȯ°æ

Á¦6Àå ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°

  • ¸¶¿ì½º ¸ðµ¨
  • Áã ¸ðµ¨

Á¦7Àå ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå : Á¾¾ç À¯Çüº°

  • À§Àå
  • ºÎÀΰú
  • Ç÷¾×ÇÐ
  • È£Èí±â
  • ºñ´¢±â°ú

Á¦8Àå ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå : ¿¬±¸ À¯Çüº°

  • »ýü¿Ü
  • ü¿Ü
  • »ýü³»

Á¦9Àå ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå : ÀÌ½Ä ¹æ¹ýº°

  • À̼Ҽº
  • Á¤¼Ò¼º
  • ÇÇÇÏ

Á¦10Àå ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

  • ÆÄ¿îµ¥ÀÌ¼Ç ¾ÏÁ¶»ç
  • ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸¶Ä¿ ¹ß°ß
  • °Ô³ð ¹× ºÐÀÚ ¿¬±¸
  • ¸ÂÃãÇü ÀÇ·á
  • ÀüÀÓ»ó ¾à¹° Æò°¡
  • Á¾¾ç ¹Ì¼¼È¯°æ ÇØ¼®

Á¦11Àå ȯÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • Çмú Á¶»ç±â°ü
  • ¾Ï¿¬±¸ ¼¾ÅÍ
  • Á¦¾à¡¤¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÅ×Å©³î·¯Áö ±â¾÷

Á¦12Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ È¯ÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå

  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ¹Ì±¹

Á¦13Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ È¯ÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå

  • È£ÁÖ
  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀϺ»
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • Çѱ¹
  • ´ë¸¸
  • ű¹
  • º£Æ®³²

Á¦14Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ È¯ÀÚ À¯·¡ ÀÌÁ¾ ÀÌ½ÄÆí/PDX ¸ðµ¨ ½ÃÀå

  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Çɶõµå
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ½ºÀ§½º
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
  • ¿µ±¹

Á¦15Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2023
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2023
  • °æÀï ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼®
  • Àü·« ºÐ¼®°ú Á¦¾È

±â¾÷ ¸®½ºÆ®

  • Abnova Corporation
  • Altogen Labs
  • Biocytogen
  • BioDuro LLC
  • BioReperia AB
  • Certis Oncology Solutions
  • Champions Oncology, Inc.
  • Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
  • Creative Animodel
  • Creative Biolabs
  • Crown Bioscience by JSR Corporation
  • EPO Berlin-Buch GmbH
  • GemPharmatech Co. Ltd.
  • Genesis Drug Discovery & Development
  • Hera Biolabs
  • HOIST Co.,Ltd.
  • InnoSer
  • Inotiv, Inc.
  • Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
  • LIDE Shanghai Biotech, Ltd
  • Mediford Corporation by PHC Holdings Corporation
  • Oncodesign Services
  • Shanghai ChemPartner
  • Shanghai Medicilon Inc.
  • TheraIndx Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd.
  • Urosphere SAS
  • WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
  • Xentech
KSA

The Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market was valued at USD 383.38 million in 2023 and is projected to grow to USD 429.04 million in 2024, with a CAGR of 12.27%, reaching USD 862.31 million by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2023] USD 383.38 million
Estimated Year [2024] USD 429.04 million
Forecast Year [2030] USD 862.31 million
CAGR (%) 12.27%

The evolving field of patient-derived xenograft models has significantly reshaped preclinical research and drug development paradigms. This innovative approach, which involves implanting human tumor tissues into immunocompromised animals, has swiftly developed into a vital tool for translational oncology. The methodology is gaining respect for its enhanced ability to mimic the human tumor microenvironment, thereby providing an invaluable platform for evaluating therapeutic efficacy and drug resistance. As global healthcare trends increasingly shift towards personalized medicine, PDX models not only mitigate the limitations of traditional in vitro systems but also pave the way for deeper insights into complex cancer biology. This report explores the historical context, underlying science, and market dynamics that continue to drive the adoption of these models across a range of applications. Detailed analyses that blend rigorous scientific inquiry with market trend insights guide readers through the intricate nuances of PDX models. The integration of comprehensive research data and analytical frameworks provides experts and decision-makers with a robust understanding of existing challenges and emerging opportunities, setting the stage for continued innovation and investment in this transformative area of biomedical research.

Transformative Shifts in the PDX Model Market Landscape

Recent years have seen transformative shifts in the PDX model market driven by technological innovation, evolving regulatory frameworks, and the steady demand for more predictive preclinical testing models. This transformation is rooted in the increasing recognition of the shortcomings of conventional cell-line based models and the compelling need for systems that closely replicate human tumor biology. Progressive advancements in genetic engineering and imaging technologies have further bolstered the precision and reproducibility of PDX studies, ensuring that both academic and industrial research avenues are well-equipped to navigate complex oncology challenges.

Market players are capitalizing on integrated platforms that combine advanced data analytics with real-time monitoring, offering unprecedented insights into therapeutic responses. There is a pronounced emphasis on streamlining experimental workflows to reduce turnaround time and cost, which in turn fosters a more agile response to emerging cancer types and treatment modalities. As researchers continually strive to tailor therapies to individual patient profiles, the market is experiencing a profound pivot towards personalized medicine. This shift not only demands higher accuracy in preclinical evaluation but also necessitates robust collaboration between research institutions, biotechnology companies, and regulatory bodies, ultimately setting a new standard for cancer research and drug development.

Comprehensive Key Segmentation Insights

The segmentation of the PDX model market reveals distinct patterns that offer actionable insights into current industry trends. An analysis based on type differentiates between mice models and rat models, highlighting the nuances and specific advantages associated with each animal system. When viewed through the lens of tumor type, research encompasses a diverse range that includes gastrointestinal, gynecological, hematological, respiratory, and urological cancers, thereby addressing the heterogeneity inherent in clinical presentations. The study type segmentation covers ex-vivo, in-vitro, and in-vivo methodologies, each providing unique strengths when it comes to simulating human biological responses. Furthermore, distinguishing models based on the implantation method shows the importance of heterotopic, orthotopic, and subcutaneous approaches in refining the relevance and accuracy of experimental outcomes.

Applications within the market are equally diverse, spanning basic cancer research, biomarker discovery, genomic and molecular studies, personalized medicine, preclinical drug evaluation, and tumor microenvironment analysis. End-user segmentation adds another important layer of insight, with academic research institutes, cancer research centers, and pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies each playing critical roles in the testing, validation, and eventual clinical translation of these models. Such a multifaceted segmentation approach underscores the depth of specialization and the interconnected nature of the research community in this dynamic field.

Based on Type, market is studied across Mice Models and Rat Models.

Based on Tumor Type, market is studied across Gastrointestinal, Gynecological, Hematological, Respiratory, and Urological.

Based on Study Type, market is studied across Ex-vivo, In-vitro, and In-vivo.

Based on Implantation Method, market is studied across Heterotopic, Orthotopic, and Subcutaneous.

Based on Application, market is studied across Basic Cancer Research, Biomarker Discovery, Genomic & Molecular Studies, Personalized Medicine, Preclinical Drug Evaluation, and Tumor Microenvironment Analysis.

Based on End-User, market is studied across Academic Research Institutes, Cancer Research Centers, and Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies.

Regional Insights Supporting Global Market Trends

Geographical analysis of the PDX model market illustrates a robust, multi-regional growth narrative with significant contributions emerging from several key territories. In the Americas, robust investment in biomedical research infrastructure and supportive governmental policies continue to drive advancements. Meanwhile, regions encompassing Europe, the Middle East and Africa are increasingly prioritizing translational research, with a greater alignment towards personalized treatment approaches and more stringent regulatory oversight supporting higher quality preclinical evaluations. Asia-Pacific stands out as a vibrant hub of innovation, supported by substantial investment in biotechnology and an expanding base of both clinical and academic research institutions. The convergence of these regional dynamics not only creates a fertile ground for collaborative research but also reinforces global standards through data sharing and cross-border partnerships.

Collectively, these regional insights point to a future where market expansion will be bolstered by a unified approach to research excellence. The confluence of diverse regional capabilities ensures that the benefits of PDX models are realized on a global scale, thereby supporting a more integrated and responsive healthcare system worldwide.

Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

Insightful Analysis of Leading Market Players

The competitive landscape in the PDX market is defined by a robust roster of companies that continue to push the boundaries of preclinical research and drug development. Key market players include Abnova Corporation, Altogen Labs, Biocytogen, BioDuro LLC, BioReperia AB, Certis Oncology Solutions, Champions Oncology, Inc., Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Creative Animodel, Creative Biolabs, Crown Bioscience by JSR Corporation, EPO Berlin-Buch GmbH, GemPharmatech Co. Ltd., Genesis Drug Discovery & Development, Hera Biolabs, HOIST Co.,Ltd., InnoSer, Inotiv, Inc., Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, LIDE Shanghai Biotech, Ltd, Mediford Corporation by PHC Holdings Corporation, Oncodesign Services, Shanghai ChemPartner, Shanghai Medicilon Inc., TheraIndx Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Urosphere SAS, WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd., and Xentech.

These organizations have strategically capitalized on technological innovations and deep scientific expertise to address an increasingly competitive market environment. Their ongoing investments in research and development, persistent focus on quality and scalability, and commitment to forging strategic collaborations have been pivotal in expanding their respective portfolios. By maintaining a forward-thinking approach, these leaders ensure that their platforms remain at the cutting edge, thereby contributing significantly to the evolution of preclinical cancer research. Their efforts not only drive market growth but also inspire emerging players to adopt more rigorous standards in the pursuit of clinical excellence.

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Abnova Corporation, Altogen Labs, Biocytogen, BioDuro LLC, BioReperia AB, Certis Oncology Solutions, Champions Oncology, Inc., Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Creative Animodel, Creative Biolabs, Crown Bioscience by JSR Corporation, EPO Berlin-Buch GmbH, GemPharmatech Co. Ltd., Genesis Drug Discovery & Development, Hera Biolabs, HOIST Co.,Ltd., InnoSer, Inotiv, Inc., Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, LIDE Shanghai Biotech, Ltd, Mediford Corporation by PHC Holdings Corporation, Oncodesign Services, Shanghai ChemPartner, Shanghai Medicilon Inc., TheraIndx Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Urosphere SAS, WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd., and Xentech. Actionable Recommendations for Industry Leaders

For industry leaders looking to harness the potential of PDX models, several actionable strategies emerge from current market trends. Optimizing research pipelines by investing in state-of-the-art imaging, genetic profiling, and data integration tools can significantly enhance preclinical validation and streamline drug development processes. Enhancing collaborative networks with leading academic institutions and clinical research centers will also be crucial in accessing real-world insights and accelerating translational research.

It is recommended that companies invest in robust quality control measures and standardization protocols to increase the reproducibility and reliability of their models. Broadening the spectrum of tumor types and refining implantation methodologies can further boost the clinical relevance of studies, thereby offering more targeted insights for personalized medicine initiatives. Leaders should also consider strategic partnerships and joint ventures as pivotal avenues for expanding their technological capabilities and accessing untapped markets. Finally, a dedicated focus on regulatory intelligence will enable organizations to navigate evolving legal frameworks more effectively, ensuring seamless integration of innovative approaches within established clinical paradigms.

Conclusion and Forward-Looking Perspective

In summing up, the landscape of patient-derived xenograft models represents a transformative and dynamic segment within the broader realm of oncology research and drug development. The integration of advanced biological models with cutting-edge technologies has paved the way for an era where preclinical assessments are more predictive and clinically relevant than ever before. This evolution not only underscores the importance of PDX models as a cornerstone for modern cancer research but also points to a future marked by enhanced precision, greater personalization, and more rapid translational outcomes.

As the market continues to evolve, stakeholders across academia, industry, and regulatory agencies must embrace the opportunities born of this convergence. A concerted effort in addressing experimental challenges, fine-tuning methodological approaches, and fostering strategic research partnerships will be key to unlocking further advancements. The journey ahead promises exciting developments, laying a robust foundation for innovations that are set to redefine therapeutic paradigms and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Market Dynamics
    • 5.1.1. Drivers
      • 5.1.1.1. Rise in cancer prevalence amplifying the need for advanced preclinical models to enhance drug discovery
      • 5.1.1.2. Increased government initiatives and fundings for oncology research
      • 5.1.1.3. Incorporation of PDX models in precision medicine for enhanced patient outcomes
    • 5.1.2. Restraints
      • 5.1.2.1. Concerns associated with instability and high-cost implications of PDX models
    • 5.1.3. Opportunities
      • 5.1.3.1. Strategic collaborations and partnership to accelerate cancer drug development
      • 5.1.3.2. Integration of advanced analytical platforms with PDX models in drug testing
    • 5.1.4. Challenges
      • 5.1.4.1. Ethical concerns and regulations limiting the use of patient-derived xenograft models in research
  • 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
    • 5.2.1. Type: Genetic similarity enhances mice model's role in translational oncology research
    • 5.2.2. Tumor Type: The ability of PDX models to closely mimic the human disease in genetic and phenotypic aspects increases the usage in hematological cancers
    • 5.2.3. Study Type: In-vivo Models enhancing preclinical cancer research through accurate replication of human tumor biology
    • 5.2.4. Implantation Method: The increasing adoption of subcutaneous implantation is driven by its simplicity and practicality in research settings
    • 5.2.5. Application: PDX models advancing preclinical drug evaluation with accurate cancer simulation
    • 5.2.6. End-User: Driving innovation in drug development with Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX models in pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies
  • 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
  • 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
    • 5.4.1. Political
    • 5.4.2. Economic
    • 5.4.3. Social
    • 5.4.4. Technological
    • 5.4.5. Legal
    • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market, by Type

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Mice Models
  • 6.3. Rat Models

7. Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market, by Tumor Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Gastrointestinal
  • 7.3. Gynecological
  • 7.4. Hematological
  • 7.5. Respiratory
  • 7.6. Urological

8. Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market, by Study Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Ex-vivo
  • 8.3. In-vitro
  • 8.4. In-vivo

9. Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market, by Implantation Method

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Heterotopic
  • 9.3. Orthotopic
  • 9.4. Subcutaneous

10. Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market, by Application

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Basic Cancer Research
  • 10.3. Biomarker Discovery
  • 10.4. Genomic & Molecular Studies
  • 10.5. Personalized Medicine
  • 10.6. Preclinical Drug Evaluation
  • 10.7. Tumor Microenvironment Analysis

11. Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market, by End-User

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Academic Research Institutes
  • 11.3. Cancer Research Centers
  • 11.4. Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies

12. Americas Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Argentina
  • 12.3. Brazil
  • 12.4. Canada
  • 12.5. Mexico
  • 12.6. United States

13. Asia-Pacific Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Australia
  • 13.3. China
  • 13.4. India
  • 13.5. Indonesia
  • 13.6. Japan
  • 13.7. Malaysia
  • 13.8. Philippines
  • 13.9. Singapore
  • 13.10. South Korea
  • 13.11. Taiwan
  • 13.12. Thailand
  • 13.13. Vietnam

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Patient-Derived Xenograft/PDX Model Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. Denmark
  • 14.3. Egypt
  • 14.4. Finland
  • 14.5. France
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. Israel
  • 14.8. Italy
  • 14.9. Netherlands
  • 14.10. Nigeria
  • 14.11. Norway
  • 14.12. Poland
  • 14.13. Qatar
  • 14.14. Russia
  • 14.15. Saudi Arabia
  • 14.16. South Africa
  • 14.17. Spain
  • 14.18. Sweden
  • 14.19. Switzerland
  • 14.20. Turkey
  • 14.21. United Arab Emirates
  • 14.22. United Kingdom

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2023
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2023
  • 15.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
    • 15.3.1. Certis Oncology unveils AI-driven chatbot to enhance cancer research insights and PDX model efficiency
    • 15.3.2. UCLB and CancerTools.org partnership enhances new NSCLC PDX models development
    • 15.3.3. Champions Oncology announces licensing agreement with Weill Cornell Medicine
    • 15.3.4. REM-422 demonstrates tumor regression in ACC PDX models at 2024 symposium
    • 15.3.5. Charles River Laboratories transforming oncology research with PDX models and digital twins at AACR 2024
    • 15.3.6. Crown Bioscience has announced new preclinical and translational oncology data at the AACR 2024
    • 15.3.7. ProteinQure unveils breakthrough PDC showcasing exceptional efficacy in diverse PDX models
    • 15.3.8. InVivo Biosystems and BioReperia partners to transform cancer drug development
    • 15.3.9. Kiyatec and XenoSTART collaborated to help reduce drug development costs
    • 15.3.10. Soteria Precision Medicine Foundation partners with Certis Oncology Solutions
  • 15.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation
    • 15.4.1. WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
    • 15.4.2. Crown Bioscience by JSR Corporation
    • 15.4.3. Mediford Corporation by PHC Holdings Corporation
    • 15.4.4. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Companies Mentioned

  • 1. Abnova Corporation
  • 2. Altogen Labs
  • 3. Biocytogen
  • 4. BioDuro LLC
  • 5. BioReperia AB
  • 6. Certis Oncology Solutions
  • 7. Champions Oncology, Inc.
  • 8. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
  • 9. Creative Animodel
  • 10. Creative Biolabs
  • 11. Crown Bioscience by JSR Corporation
  • 12. EPO Berlin-Buch GmbH
  • 13. GemPharmatech Co. Ltd.
  • 14. Genesis Drug Discovery & Development
  • 15. Hera Biolabs
  • 16. HOIST Co.,Ltd.
  • 17. InnoSer
  • 18. Inotiv, Inc.
  • 19. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
  • 20. LIDE Shanghai Biotech, Ltd
  • 21. Mediford Corporation by PHC Holdings Corporation
  • 22. Oncodesign Services
  • 23. Shanghai ChemPartner
  • 24. Shanghai Medicilon Inc.
  • 25. TheraIndx Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd.
  • 26. Urosphere SAS
  • 27. WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
  • 28. Xentech
ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦