½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1717926

µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå : ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò, Å×½ºÆ® À¯Çü, µµÀÔ ÇüÅÂ, Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ð, ¿ëµµ, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Dynamic Application Security Testing Market by Component, Test Type, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 193 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 32¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 2025³â¿¡´Â 38¾ï 2,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯, CAGR 18.14%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 88¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ 2024³â 32¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ 2025³â 38¾ï 2,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ 2030³â 88¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 18.14%

µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ®´Â Çö´ë ±â¼ú »ýŰ迡¼­ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ¿ä¼Ò°¡ µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¾÷ÀÌ ºñÁî´Ï½º ¼º°øÀ» À§ÇØ Ã·´Ü ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ǿ¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÁ¸µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó, Ãë¾àÁ¡À» ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ±× ¾î´À ¶§º¸´Ù ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¥½ºÅ©Åé, ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ, À¥ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ÇÀÌ °í°´°ú ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä Á¢Á¡ÀÌ µÇ´Â ¿À´Ã³¯°ú °°ÀÌ ºü¸£°Ô º¯È­Çϴ ȯ°æ¿¡¼­´Â »õ·Î¿î À§Çù¿¡ ¼±Á¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ´ëÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â µ¿Àû º¸¾È ´ëÃ¥ÀÇ µµÀÔÀÌ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀº ±âÁ¸ º¸¾È ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀ» º¸¿ÏÇÒ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ¾ÖÀÚÀÏ °³¹ß ¹× Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ÅëÇÕ °üÇà°ú ¿øÈ°ÇÏ°Ô ÅëÇÕÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½ÇÇà ÁßÀÎ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ÇÀ» ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷Àº Á¤Àû Å×½ºÆ®¿¡¼­ ³õÄ¡±â ½¬¿î ¾Ö¸ÅÇÑ º¸¾È °áÇÔÀ» ¹ß°ßÇÏ°í ¾Ç¿ëÀÇ À§ÇèÀ» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ȯ°æ°ú º¹ÀâÇÑ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÁ¸µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó, µ¿Àû Å×½ºÆ®´Â ±â¾÷ÀÌ ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î Ãë¾àÁ¡À» ã¾Æ³»°í ÀáÀçÀûÀÎ À§Çù¿¡ µû¶ó º¸È£ Á¶Ä¡°¡ ÁøÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï µµ¿ÍÁÝ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¼Ò°³¿¡¼­´Â ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ®ÀÇ ÇöȲÀ» Á¤ÀÇÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä µ¿Çâ, Àü·«Àû Á¢±Ù ¹æ½Ä, ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀ» °³°ýÀûÀ¸·Î ¼³¸íÇÏ¿© ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ ³íÀÇÀÇ ÀåÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ®ÀÇ È¯°æÀ» ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇÏ´Â Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ º¯È­

ÃÖ±Ù ¸î ³â µ¿¾È ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ȯ°æÀº ±â¼ú Çõ½Å°ú ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â »çÀ̹ö À§ÇùÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ º¯È­¸¦ °æÇèÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÚµ¿È­, ÀΰøÁö´É, ¸Ó½Å·¯´×ÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ Å×½ºÆ® ¹æ¹ýÀ» À籸¼ºÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù ºü¸£°í Á¤È®ÇÑ Ãë¾àÁ¡ ŽÁö°¡ °¡´ÉÇØÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. Á¶Á÷Àº ÀÌÁ¦ °³¹ß ¶óÀÌÇÁ»çÀÌŬÀÇ ¸ðµç ´Ü°è¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ÅëÇÕµÈ º¸¾ÈÀ» äÅÃÇÏ¿© º¸¾ÈÀ» ÈĹ濡¼­ µðÁöÅÐ Àü·«ÀÇ °íÀ¯ÇÑ ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò·Î ¹Ù²Ù°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ È®»êÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ À¯µ¿ÀûÀΠȯ°æ¿¡¼­ È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÛµ¿ÇÏ´Â µ¿Àû Å×½ºÆ® ¼ö´ÜÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¾÷µéÀÌ ¾ÖÀÚÀÏ ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ÀüȯÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó, º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ®¸¦ Áö¼ÓÀû ÅëÇÕ ¹× Áö¼ÓÀû Á¦°ø ÆÄÀÌÇÁ¶óÀο¡ Á÷Á¢ ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Àû±ØÀûÀÎ ÀüȯÀº Áß¿äÇÑ Ãë¾àÁ¡ ¼öÁ¤À» °¡¼ÓÈ­ÇÒ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, º¸¾È¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °í·Á°¡ óÀ½ºÎÅÍ ¿î¿µ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ ÅëÇյǾî ÀÖÀ½À» º¸ÀåÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀ» ÅëÇØ ±â¾÷Àº »õ·Î¿î À§Çù¿¡ ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°Ô ´ëÀÀÇϰí, ±âÁ¸ Å×½ºÆ® ¹æ½Ä°ú ÃֽŠº¸¾È À̽´ »çÀÌÀÇ °£±ØÀ» Á¼Çô ±Ã±ØÀûÀ¸·Î µðÁöÅÐ ÀÚ»êÀ» º¸´Ù È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î º¸È£ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀ» ÀÌÇØÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÁÖ¿ä ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ® Á¦°ø

½ÃÀåÀ» ÀÚ¼¼È÷ Á¶»çÇÏ¸é µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ®ÀÇ ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ¿ªÇп¡ ´ëÇÑ ±ÍÁßÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­°¡ µå·¯³³´Ï´Ù. ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¸é ½ÃÀåÀº ¼­ºñ½º ¹× ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ¸·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­µÇ°í, ¼­ºñ½º ³»¿¡¼­´Â °ü¸®Çü ¼­ºñ½º¿Í Àü¹® ¼­ºñ½º ¹üÁÖ·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­µË´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Å×½ºÆ® À¯Çü ¼¼ºÐÈ­¸¦ Æò°¡Çϸé ÀÚµ¿ Å×½ºÆ®¿Í ¼öµ¿ Å×½ºÆ® Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» ±¸ºÐÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±â¼ú Áß½ÉÀÇ È¿À²¼º°ú º¹ÀâÇÑ º¸¾È Ãë¾àÁ¡À» ÇØ°áÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ Àΰ£ Àü¹® Áö½ÄÀÇ À¶ÇÕÀ» °­Á¶ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹èÆ÷ ÇüÅÂÀÇ ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ±¸¼º°ú ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º ±¸¼ºÀÇ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌÁ¡À» º¸¿©ÁÖ¸ç, °¢ ±¸¼ºÀº °íÀ¯ÇÑ Á¶Á÷ ¿ä±¸¿Í ¿î¿µ ȯ°æ¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ð¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â ´ë±â¾÷°ú Áß¼Ò±â¾÷(SME)ÀÇ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀÌ ´Ù¸£´Ù´Â Á¡À» °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â ¸®¼Ò½º ÇÒ´ç ¼öÁذú º¸¾È ¿ì¼± ¼øÀ§°¡ ´Ù¸£´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ºÐ¼®Àº ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ǿ¡µµ Àû¿ëµÇ¸ç, º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀº µ¥½ºÅ©Åé, ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ, À¥ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç °¢°¢¿¡ ¸Â°Ô Á¶Á¤µË´Ï´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº° ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â BFSI, ÇコÄɾî, Á¦Á¶, ¼Ò¸Å¾÷, Åë½Å, IT¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ´Ù¾çÇÑ »ê¾÷±º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­¸¦ ÅëÇØ °¢ »ê¾÷º° º¸¾È ¼ö¿ä¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ °áÇÕÇÏ¸é ´Ù¾çÇÑ °í°´ ¿ä±¸ »çÇ×°ú Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ±â¼ú ¹ßÀü¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î ²÷ÀÓ¾øÀÌ ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ½ÃÀåÀÇ Àüü ¸ð½ÀÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
    • ¼ºÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
    • ±âȸ
    • ÇØ°áÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °úÁ¦
  • ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®
  • Porter¡¯s Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTLE ºÐ¼®
    • Á¤Ä¡
    • °æÁ¦
    • »çȸ
    • ±â¼ú
    • ¹ý·ü
    • ȯ°æ

Á¦6Àå µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå : ±¸¼º¿ä¼Òº°

  • ¼­ºñ½º
    • ¸Å´ÏÁöµå ¼­ºñ½º
    • Àü¹® ¼­ºñ½º
  • ¼Ö·ç¼Ç

Á¦7Àå µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå : Å×½ºÆ® Á¾·ùº°

  • ÀÚµ¿ Å×½ºÆ®
  • ¼öµ¿ Å×½ºÆ®

Á¦8Àå µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå : Àü°³ ¹æ½Äº°

  • Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý
  • ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º

Á¦9Àå µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå : Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°

  • ´ë±â¾÷
  • Áß¼Ò±â¾÷

Á¦10Àå µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

  • µ¥½ºÅ©Åé ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼Ç
  • ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼Ç
  • À¥ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼Ç

Á¦11Àå µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • BFSI(ÀºÇà, ±ÝÀ¶ ¼­ºñ½º, º¸Çè)
  • ÇコÄɾî
  • Á¦Á¶¾÷
  • ¼Ò¸Å
  • Åë½Å°ú IT

Á¦12Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå

  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ¹Ì±¹

Á¦13Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå

  • È£ÁÖ
  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀϺ»
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • Çѱ¹
  • ´ë¸¸
  • ű¹
  • º£Æ®³²

Á¦14Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ µ¿Àû ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç º¸¾È Å×½ºÆ® ½ÃÀå

  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Çɶõµå
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ½ºÀ§½º
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
  • ¿µ±¹

Á¦15Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼®
  • Àü·« ºÐ¼®°ú Á¦¾È

±â¾÷ ¸®½ºÆ®

  • AppCheck Ltd.
  • Appknox Inc.
  • Astra IT, Inc.
  • Beagle Cyber Innovations Pvt. Ltd.
  • BreachLock Inc.
  • Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • Checkmarx Ltd.
  • Detectify Inc.
  • eShard Inc.
  • Fortinet, Inc.
  • GitLab Inc.
  • HCL Technologies Limited
  • Indusface Inc.
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • Intruder Systems Ltd
  • Invicti Inc.
  • OpenText Corporation
  • PortSwigger Ltd.
  • Positive Technologies
  • Probely Inc.
  • Rapid7 Inc.
  • Sn1per Professional Inc.
  • Snyk Limited
  • SOOS LLC
  • StackHawk Inc.
  • Synopsys, Inc.
  • Veracode, Inc.
ksm

The Dynamic Application Security Testing Market was valued at USD 3.24 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 3.82 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 18.14%, reaching USD 8.83 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 3.24 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 3.82 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 8.83 billion
CAGR (%) 18.14%

Dynamic application security testing has become an indispensable element in the modern technology ecosystem. As organizations increasingly rely on sophisticated applications to drive business success, the need to identify vulnerabilities in real time has never been more acute. In today's fast-paced environment, where desktop, mobile, and web applications are the primary touchpoints for customers and stakeholders alike, adopting dynamic security measures is essential to stay ahead of emerging threats. This approach not only complements traditional security protocols but also integrates seamlessly with agile development and continuous integration practices. By monitoring applications during runtime, organizations can uncover elusive security flaws that static testing often misses, thereby reducing the risk of exploitation. With a growing reliance on cloud-based environments and complex application frameworks, dynamic testing empowers businesses to pinpoint weaknesses in real time, ensuring that protective measures evolve in tandem with potential threats. This introduction sets the stage for an in-depth discussion by outlining key trends, strategic approaches, and market dynamics that define the current state of application security testing.

Transformative Shifts Redefining the Application Security Testing Landscape

Over recent years, the landscape of application security testing has experienced transformative shifts driven by technological innovation and evolving cyber threats. Advancements in automation, artificial intelligence, and machine learning have reshaped traditional testing methodologies, enabling faster and more accurate vulnerability detection. Organizations are now embracing integrated security across all stages of the development life cycle, thus transforming security from an afterthought into an inherent component of digital strategy. The proliferation of cloud-based solutions has also necessitated the adoption of dynamic testing measures that can operate effectively in these fluid environments. As businesses pivot towards agile methodologies, there is a growing trend to incorporate security testing directly into continuous integration and continuous delivery pipelines. This proactive shift not only accelerates the remediation of critical vulnerabilities but also ensures that security considerations are embedded within the operational framework from the outset. The new paradigm empowers organizations to adapt to emerging threats rapidly, bridge the gap between traditional testing methods and modern security challenges, and ultimately safeguard their digital assets more effectively.

Key Segmentation Insights to Understand Market Dynamics

An in-depth examination of the market reveals a nuanced segmentation that provides valuable insights into the evolving dynamics of dynamic application security testing. When analyzed from the perspective of components, the market dissects offerings into services and solutions, with a further distinction within services between managed and professional service categories. In addition, evaluating test type segmentation helps distinguish between automated testing and manual testing approaches, highlighting the blend of technology-driven efficiency and the indispensable human expertise necessary for addressing complex security vulnerabilities. Deployment mode segmentation illustrates a clear divergence between cloud-based and on-premises configurations, each catering to unique organizational needs and operational environments. Moreover, the segmentation based on organization size emphasizes the differentiated approaches employed by large enterprises as opposed to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), reflecting varying levels of resource allocation and security priorities. The analysis extends to applications, where security testing approaches are tailored for desktop, mobile, and web applications. Finally, segmentation by end user spans industries from BFSI, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail, to telecom and IT, ensuring that insights cater to the very specific security demands of each sector. Together, these segmentation factors paint a comprehensive picture of a market in constant evolution, driven by varying customer requirements and innovative technological advancements.

Based on Component, market is studied across Services and Solutions. The Services is further studied across Managed Services and Professional Services.

Based on Test Type, market is studied across Automated Testing and Manual Testing.

Based on Deployment Mode, market is studied across Cloud-Based and On-Premises.

Based on Organization Size, market is studied across Large Enterprises and Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs).

Based on Application, market is studied across Desktop Applications, Mobile Applications, and Web Applications.

Based on End User, market is studied across BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, And Insurance), Healthcare, Manufacturing, Retail, and telecom And IT.

Key Regional Insights Across Global Markets

A review of regional dynamics underscores the importance of contextual factors in shaping the dynamic application security testing market. In the Americas, the adoption of next-generation testing technologies is supported by robust investments in digital transformation and cybersecurity infrastructure. Simultaneously, the Europe, Middle East & Africa region exhibits a strong regulatory framework driven by data protection laws and industry-specific compliance mandates, prompting organizations to adopt proactive security testing measures. The Asia-Pacific region, on the other hand, is marked by rapid digitalization and a surge in tech-driven startups, which has led to an accelerated deployment of innovative security solutions. These regions are interlinked by a converging trend of heightened awareness around cyber threats and a shared commitment to strengthening digital resilience. Despite differences in market maturity and regulatory environments, each region contributes uniquely to the overall growth trajectory by adapting security strategies that resonate with their localized business challenges and technological infrastructures.

Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

Key Companies Insights Shaping the Industry

Industry leaders continue to drive innovation and set benchmarks in the realm of application security testing. Key market players have been instrumental in propelling advancements through research, development, and the deployment of cutting-edge solutions. Firms such as AppCheck Ltd., Appknox Inc., Astra IT, Inc., and Beagle Cyber Innovations Pvt. Ltd. have established themselves as pioneers by integrating state-of-the-art technology with industry best practices. Equally notable contributors include BreachLock Inc., Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., and Checkmarx Ltd., each known for their robust and scalable security offerings. Companies like Detectify Inc., eShard Inc., and Fortinet, Inc. bring deep expertise across different segments, while GitLab Inc. and HCL Technologies Limited emphasize the importance of integrating security within all phases of the software development lifecycle. The contributions of Indusface Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, and Intruder Systems Ltd further underscore the broad-based industry commitment to innovation. Additionally, Invicti Inc., OpenText Corporation, PortSwigger Ltd., Positive Technologies, Probely Inc., Rapid7 Inc., and Sn1per Professional Inc. continue to shape the market with solutions that balance performance and comprehensive security. Finally, the impact of Snyk Limited, SOOS LLC, StackHawk Inc., Synopsys, Inc., and Veracode, Inc. illustrates the diverse and competitive environment that is continuously pushing the boundaries of what is possible in dynamic application security testing.

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include AppCheck Ltd., Appknox Inc., Astra IT, Inc., Beagle Cyber Innovations Pvt. Ltd., BreachLock Inc., Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., Checkmarx Ltd., Detectify Inc., eShard Inc., Fortinet, Inc., GitLab Inc., HCL Technologies Limited, Indusface Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, Intruder Systems Ltd, Invicti Inc., OpenText Corporation, PortSwigger Ltd., Positive Technologies, Probely Inc., Rapid7 Inc., Sn1per Professional Inc., Snyk Limited, SOOS LLC, StackHawk Inc., Synopsys, Inc., and Veracode, Inc.. Actionable Recommendations for Industry Leaders

For decision-makers steering the course in a field as dynamic as application security testing, actionable recommendations are crucial. Leaders should prioritize the integration of automated testing solutions that not only streamline the vulnerability detection process but also work in tandem with manual testing for in-depth insights. Embracing cloud-based frameworks can further enhance scalability and flexibility in managing complex IT ecosystems. It is also advisable for organizations to cultivate strategic partnerships that facilitate knowledge sharing and advanced threat intelligence, thereby building robust and future-proof security architectures. By continually investing in comprehensive training programs and adopting the latest industry technologies, companies can better anticipate evolving cyber threats and adapt their security testing strategies accordingly.

Conclusion: Navigating a Rapidly Evolving Security Landscape

In conclusion, the dynamic application security testing market is characterized by rapid transformation, advanced segmentation, and global diversification. The integration of real-time monitoring with both manual and automated testing processes is redefining how vulnerabilities are detected and mitigated, thereby ushering in a new era of proactive security measures. Companies across various industries, regardless of size and regional differences, are recognizing the inherent value of investing in advanced testing solutions. The insights derived from component, test type, deployment mode, organization size, application, and end-user analysis not only offer a granular view of market dynamics but also pave the way for strategic decision-making. As the market continues to evolve, adopting a multifaceted approach that balances technology at speed with strategic oversight will be key to sustaining competitive advantage and ensuring business resilience.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Market Dynamics
    • 5.1.1. Drivers
      • 5.1.1.1. Rising incidence of cyberattacks targeting web applications and APIs across diverse industry verticals
      • 5.1.1.2. Growing adoption of DevSecOps practices to facilitate seamless security testing integration within CI/CD pipelines
      • 5.1.1.3. Stringent regulatory requirements mandating robust security testing protocols to protect data privacy and integrity
    • 5.1.2. Restraints
      • 5.1.2.1. High initial investment and implementation costs associated with dynamic application security testing solutions
    • 5.1.3. Opportunities
      • 5.1.3.1. Advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of DAST tools
      • 5.1.3.2. Increasing digital transformation and cloud-based application deployment in emerging economies driving demand for scalable security solutions
    • 5.1.4. Challenges
      • 5.1.4.1. Balancing rapid product innovation with compliance to diverse global regulatory frameworks and standards
  • 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
    • 5.2.1. Component: Managed services for dynamic application security testing ensuring continuous protection and compliance
    • 5.2.2. End User: Growing adoption of dynamic application security testing in manufacturing
  • 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
  • 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
    • 5.4.1. Political
    • 5.4.2. Economic
    • 5.4.3. Social
    • 5.4.4. Technological
    • 5.4.5. Legal
    • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, by Component

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Services
    • 6.2.1. Managed Services
    • 6.2.2. Professional Services
  • 6.3. Solutions

7. Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, by Test Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Automated Testing
  • 7.3. Manual Testing

8. Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, by Deployment Mode

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Cloud-Based
  • 8.3. On-Premises

9. Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, by Organization Size

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Large Enterprises
  • 9.3. Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

10. Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, by Application

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Desktop Applications
  • 10.3. Mobile Applications
  • 10.4. Web Applications

11. Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, by End User

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, And Insurance)
  • 11.3. Healthcare
  • 11.4. Manufacturing
  • 11.5. Retail
  • 11.6. telecom And IT

12. Americas Dynamic Application Security Testing Market

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Argentina
  • 12.3. Brazil
  • 12.4. Canada
  • 12.5. Mexico
  • 12.6. United States

13. Asia-Pacific Dynamic Application Security Testing Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Australia
  • 13.3. China
  • 13.4. India
  • 13.5. Indonesia
  • 13.6. Japan
  • 13.7. Malaysia
  • 13.8. Philippines
  • 13.9. Singapore
  • 13.10. South Korea
  • 13.11. Taiwan
  • 13.12. Thailand
  • 13.13. Vietnam

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Dynamic Application Security Testing Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. Denmark
  • 14.3. Egypt
  • 14.4. Finland
  • 14.5. France
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. Israel
  • 14.8. Italy
  • 14.9. Netherlands
  • 14.10. Nigeria
  • 14.11. Norway
  • 14.12. Poland
  • 14.13. Qatar
  • 14.14. Russia
  • 14.15. Saudi Arabia
  • 14.16. South Africa
  • 14.17. Spain
  • 14.18. Sweden
  • 14.19. Switzerland
  • 14.20. Turkey
  • 14.21. United Arab Emirates
  • 14.22. United Kingdom

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
    • 15.3.1. Appknox transforms mobile security in Saudi Arabia with AI-driven dynamic application testing solutions
    • 15.3.2. Strategic partnership between eScan and TD SYNNEX strengthens cybersecurity distribution through advanced DAST solutions
    • 15.3.3. Snyk's strategic acquisition of Probely strengthens its dynamic application security testing capabilities
    • 15.3.4. Checkmarx and ZAP collaboration supercharges DAST innovation, enabling robust open source growth
  • 15.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation

Companies Mentioned

  • 1. AppCheck Ltd.
  • 2. Appknox Inc.
  • 3. Astra IT, Inc.
  • 4. Beagle Cyber Innovations Pvt. Ltd.
  • 5. BreachLock Inc.
  • 6. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • 7. Checkmarx Ltd.
  • 8. Detectify Inc.
  • 9. eShard Inc.
  • 10. Fortinet, Inc.
  • 11. GitLab Inc.
  • 12. HCL Technologies Limited
  • 13. Indusface Inc.
  • 14. International Business Machines Corporation
  • 15. Intruder Systems Ltd
  • 16. Invicti Inc.
  • 17. OpenText Corporation
  • 18. PortSwigger Ltd.
  • 19. Positive Technologies
  • 20. Probely Inc.
  • 21. Rapid7 Inc.
  • 22. Sn1per Professional Inc.
  • 23. Snyk Limited
  • 24. SOOS LLC
  • 25. StackHawk Inc.
  • 26. Synopsys, Inc.
  • 27. Veracode, Inc.
ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦