½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1804643

±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀå : Àç·á À¯Çü, ±Ý¼Ó À¯Çü, ±â¼ú, À¯Åë ä³Î, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ »ê¾÷º° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Metal Scavenger Market by Material Type, Metal Type, Technology, Distribution Channel, End User Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 189 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 25¾ï 9,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. 2025³â¿¡´Â 27¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸£°í, CAGR 5.67%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 36¾ï 1,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ : 2024³â 25¾ï 9,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ : 2025³â 27¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ : 2030³â 36¾ï 1,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 5.67%

±Ý¼Ó ȸ¼ö´Â »ê¾÷ Æó¼ö ¹× Á¦Ç°º° ±Í±Ý¼ÓÀ» ȸ¼öÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ °øÁ¤À¸·Î ºÎ»óÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ãֱ٠ȯ°æ ±ÔÁ¦¿Í ¿øÀÚÀç °¡°Ý »ó½ÂÀÇ ¼ö·ÅÀ¸·Î È¿À²ÀûÀΠȸ¼ö ±â¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¾÷ÀÌ ÀÚ¿ø Ȱ¿ëÀ» ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÏ°í Æó±â¹°À» ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇØ ³ë·ÂÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, ±Ý¼Ó û¼Ò±â ±â¼úÀº ´Ù¾çÇÑ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ Á¡Á¡ ´õ Àü·«ÀûÀÎ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Ȱ¼ºÅº ¹× »êÈ­ ±×·¡Çɰú °°Àº ÷´Ü Àç·áÀÇ ÁøÈ­´Â ³·Àº ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼Òºñ·®À¸·Î ´õ ³ôÀº ÃßÃâ È¿À²À» ´Þ¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â »õ·Î¿î ±æÀ» ¿­¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ, »ê¾÷ °üÇàÀÇ º¯È­·Î ÀÎÇØ º¸´Ù ¼±ÅÃÀûÀÌ°í °ß°íÇÑ ½º ijºóÀú ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸· ±â¹Ý ¿©°ú¿Í À̿ ±³È¯ È­ÇÐ ¹°ÁúÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀº ƯÁ¤ ±Ý¼Ó ÀÌ¿ÂÀ» Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô Å¸°ÙÆÃÇÏ¿© ±³Â÷ ¿À¿°À» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ°í ´Ù¿î½ºÆ®¸² °øÁ¤À» °£¼ÒÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¼øÈ¯ °æÁ¦ ¿øÄ¢¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνÄÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀÌ Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ ±Ý¼Ó ȸ¼ö ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀ» ¾÷¹«¿¡ ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ȯ°æÀû, °æÁ¦Àû ÀÌÀÍÀ» âÃâÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Àå·ÁÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ, ÇöÀç ÁøÇà ÁßÀÎ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À ÈíÂø ¹× ų·¹ÀÌÆ®È­¿Í °°Àº »ý¸í°øÇÐ Á¢±Ù¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â È®À强°ú ºñ¿ë È¿À²¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±â´ëÄ¡¸¦ À籸¼ºÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº È­Çй°Áú ¼Òºñ¸¦ ÁÙÀÌ°í »ýºÐÇØ¼ºÀ» ³ô¿© ¾ö°ÝÇÑ Æó¼ö °ü·Ã ±ÔÁ¦ ±âÁØÀ» ÃæÁ·ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÁýÁ¦ÀÇ »óȲÀº ±â¼ú Á¦°ø¾÷ü, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ, ±ÔÁ¦ ±â°üÀÇ Çù·ÂÀû ³ë·Â¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î È®´ëµÉ ż¼¸¦ °®Ãß°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

°æÀïÀÌ Ä¡¿­ÇØÁö¸é¼­ µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ ¼ÒÀç¿Í °øÁ¤ ÃÖÀûÈ­¸¦ ÅëÇÑ Â÷º°È­°¡ Á¦Á¶¾÷üÀÇ ÃÊÁ¡ÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ´ëÇü È­Çо÷ü¿Í ¸âºê·¹ÀÎ ±â¼úÀÚÀÇ ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀº º¯µ¿ÇÏ´Â ±Ý¼Ó ³óµµ¿¡ ÀûÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ½Ã³ÊÁö È¿°ú¸¦ âÃâÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡, µðÁöÅÐ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ°ú ½Ç½Ã°£ ºÐ¼®Àº °øÁ¤ Á¦¾î¸¦ °­È­Çϰí, ¿¹Áöº¸ÀüÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô Çϸç, ÀϰüµÈ Ãâ·Â ǰÁúÀ» º¸ÀåÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Ãß¼¼ÀÇ ¼ö·ÅÀº °ø±Þ¸ÁÀÇ °­ÀÎÇÔÀ» ÁöŰ°í »ê¾÷°è Àü¹ÝÀÇ Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º ¸ñÇ¥¸¦ ÃßÁøÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î ±Ý¼Ó ÆóÀÚ¿ø ȸ¼ö¾÷ü°¡ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ºÐ¸íÈ÷ º¸¿©ÁÝ´Ï´Ù.

±Ý¼Ó Á¦°Å °øÁ¤°ú °æÀï»ç Æ÷Áö¼Å´×À» º¯È­½ÃŰ´Â ±â¼ú ¹ßÀü°ú ±ÔÁ¦ º¯È­ Æò°¡

±Ý¼Ó û¼ÒÀÇ ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀº ±â¼úÀû Çõ½Å°ú ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ȯ°æÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ±× ¾î´À ¶§º¸´Ù ºü¸¥ ¼Óµµ·Î °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¡ÇÉ »êÈ­¹°°ú °°Àº ÷´Ü ³ª³ë¼ÒÀç´Â ¶Ù¾î³­ ÈíÂø ´É·ÂÀ» ÀÔÁõÇÏ¿© ±âÁ¸ Ȱ¼ºÅºÀÇ º¥Ä¡¸¶Å©¸¦ ÀçÆò°¡Çϵµ·Ï À¯µµÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, °ü´É±â¸¦ Á¶Á¤ÇÑ °íºÐÀÚ ¼öÁö´Â ±¸¸®³ª ´ÏÄ̰ú °°Àº Áß¿ä ±Ý¼Ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼±ÅüºÀ» ³ô¿© ¿¡³ÊÁö Áý¾àÀûÀÎ °Ç½Ä Á¦·Ã °øÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÁ¸µµ¸¦ ³·Ãß°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ¾÷°è´Â ¸· ¿©°ú¿Í ų·¹ÀÌÆ®È­ ¶Ç´Â »ýü Èí¼ö¸¦ °áÇÕÇÑ ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀ» ¸ñ°ÝÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

2025³â ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼°¡ ±Ý¼Ó ȸ¼ö »ç¾÷ °ø±Þ¸Á°ú °æÁ¦¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ´©Àû ¿µÇ⠺м®

2025³â ÃÊ, ¹Ì±¹ ³» ¼öÀÔ ¿øÀÚÀç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î °ü¼¼ Á¶Ä¡ÀÇ µµÀÔÀº ±Ý¼Ó ȸ¼ö »ç¾÷¿¡ Å« ÆÄ±Þ È¿°ú¸¦ °¡Á®¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °ü¼¼´Â ±¹³» Á¦Á¶¸¦ °­È­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ °ÍÀÌÁö¸¸, ±¹Á¦ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¶´ÞµÇ´Â Ư¼ö ÈíÂøÁ¦ ¹× ¸âºê·¹ÀÎ ºÎǰÀÇ ºñ¿ë ±â¹ÝÀ» »ó½Â½ÃÄ×½À´Ï´Ù. °ø±Þ¾÷üµéÀÌ ÅõÀÔºñ¿ë »ó½Â¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, °í°´µéÀº °íºÐÀÚ¼öÁö¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ °íȰ¼ºÅº¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ÈíÂøÁ¦ Á¶´Þ Àü·«À» Àç°ËÅäÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ÀϺΠÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚµéÀº °ü¼¼ °ü·Ã °¡°Ý º¯µ¿¿¡ ³ëÃâµÉ À§ÇèÀ» ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇØ ±¹³»¿¡¼­ »ý»ê °¡´ÉÇÑ ´ëü Àç·á³ª ¸éÁ¦ ¹«¿ª ÇùÁ¤À» ÅëÇØ Á¶´ÞÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ´ëü Àç·áÀÇ ÀÎÁõÀ» À§ÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Àç·á À¯Çü, ±Ý¼Ó Ä«Å×°í¸®, ±â¼ú, À¯Åë ä³Î, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ »ê¾÷ µî ÁÖ¿ä ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

û¼Ò±â ½ÃÀåÀÇ Àç·áÀÇ ´Ù¾ç¼ºÀº ƯÁ¤ ¾÷¹« ¿ä°Ç¿¡ ¸Â´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ È¸¼ö Àü·«À» µÞ¹ÞħÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Àç·áÀÇ À¯Çü¿¡ µû¶ó Ȱ¼ºÅºÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÈ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ÈíÂø·ÂÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇϰí, »êÈ­ ±×·¡ÇÉÀº ¹Ì·® ±Ý¼Ó ÈíÂøÀ» À§ÇØ ¿ì¼öÇÑ Ç¥¸éÀûÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. °íºÐÀÚ ¼öÁö´Â ¾çÀ̿ ¶Ç´Â À½À̿ ¼±ÅüºÀ» °®µµ·Ï ¼³°èÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¸ÂÃãÇü °áÇÕ ºÎÀ§¸¦ Á¦°øÇϸç, Á¦¿Ã¶óÀÌÆ®´Â °í¿Â ÀÀ¿ë ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ °­·ÂÇÑ ¿­ ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Â÷ÀÌÁ¡À» ÅëÇØ ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ´Â °ø±Þ ±¸¼º ¹× °øÁ¤ Á¦¾à¿¡ µû¶ó ½ºÄ˺óÀú ¸Åü¸¦ Á¶Á¤ÇÏ¿© ÃÖÀûÀÇ ÃßÃâ ¼öÀ²À» ´Þ¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ºÏ¹Ì, ³²¹Ì, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÁýÁ¦ äÅÿ¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Áö¿ª µ¿Çâ ¹× ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ ÆÄ¾Ç

ºÏ¹Ì¿Í ³²¹Ì¿¡¼­´Â ´õ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ Æó¼ö ¹èÃâ Á¦ÇÑÀ» °­Á¶ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©°¡ ÷´Ü û¼Ò±â ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ºÏ¹ÌÀÇ È­ÇÐ󸮽ü³°ú ¼ö󸮽ü³¿¡¼­´Â À̿±³È¯°ú ¸·¿©°ú¸¦ °áÇÕÇÑ ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ȯ°æ±ÔÁ¦¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÏ´Â ÇÑÆí, ±¹³» °ø±Þ¿øÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºñ¿ë°ü¸®¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÇöÁö À¯Åë¾÷ü¿Í Á÷Á¢ ÆÇ¸ÅÆÀ°úÀÇ ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» ÅëÇØ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ÀÏÁ¤¿¡ ¸ÂÃß¾î ÈíÂøÁ¦¸¦ ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°Ô ¹èÄ¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

°æÀï ȯ°æ Æò°¡ ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ Àü·«Àû ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê ±Ý¼Ó û¼Ò ºÐ¾ßÀÇ Çõ½Å°ú ¼ºÀå¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³ë·Â

±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ȹÁ¦ ºÎ¹®ÀÇ °æÀï ȯ°æÀº Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ, Á¦Ç° Çõ½Å, ÁÖ¿ä ¾÷ü °£ÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀÌ Æ¯Â¡ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä È­Çй°Áú °ø±Þ¾÷ü´Â ¸âºê·¹ÀÎ ±â¼ú Àü¹®°¡¿ÍÀÇ ¿¬±¸ Á¦ÈÞ¸¦ ÅëÇØ Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À¸¦ È®ÀåÇϰí, ³ôÀº ÈíÂø ¿ë·®°ú Àç»ý ¿ëÀ̼ºÀÇ ±ÕÇüÀ» °®Ãá Â÷¼¼´ë ÈíÂøÁ¦¸¦ °³¹ßÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÀϺΠ±â¾÷µéÀº ÆÄÀÏ·µ Ç÷£Æ®¿¡ ÅõÀÚÇÏ¿© »ê¾÷Àû Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­ µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ °íºÐÀÚ ¼öÁö¸¦ °ËÁõÇÏ¿© ½ÃÀå Ãâ½Ã ½Ã°£À» ´ÜÃàÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±Ý¼Ó ȸ¼öÀÇ È¿À²¼º°ú ¼öÀͼº, ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö °­È­¸¦ À§ÇØ ¾÷°è ¸®´õµé¿¡°Ô ½ÇÇà °¡´ÉÇÑ Á¦¾È°ú Àü·«Àû ·Îµå¸ÊÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¾÷°è ¸®´õµéÀº º¯È­ÇÏ´Â °ø±Þ ±¸¼º°ú ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä°Ç¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°Ô ±¸¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¸ðµâ½Ä ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÁýÁ¦ Ç÷§Æû °³¹ßÀ» ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¿¡ µÎ¾î¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Ç÷§Æû ±â¹Ý Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» äÅÃÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷Àº R&D Áֱ⸦ °£¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ°í ¿©·¯ ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ »ê¾÷¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ¸ÂÃãÇü ÈíÂø ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ¹èÆ÷¸¦ °¡¼ÓÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¼¾¼­ ±â¹Ý ºÐ¼®À» ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Ç÷§Æû¿¡ ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º °¡½Ã¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̰í, »çÀü Á¶Á¤À» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô Çϸç, ¼º´É ÆíÂ÷¸¦ ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

µ¥ÀÌÅÍÀÇ ¿ÏÀü¼º°ú Á¤È®¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇÏ´Â 1Â÷ Á¶»ç¿Í 2Â÷ Á¶»ç ¹× ºÐ¼® ±â¹ýÀ» °áÇÕÇÑ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¼¼ºÎ ³»¿ë

º» ºÐ¼®À» µÞ¹ÞħÇÏ´Â Á¶»ç¹æ¹ýÀº Á¤È®¼º, Æ÷°ý¼º, Ÿ´ç¼ºÀ» È®º¸Çϱâ À§ÇØ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ 1Â÷ Á¶»ç¿Í 2Â÷ Á¶»ç¸¦ °áÇÕÇÏ¿© ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. 1Â÷ Á¶»ç¿¡´Â È­ÇРó¸®, Á¦¾à, ¼öó¸® ºÐ¾ß¸¦ ´ëÇ¥ÇÏ´Â ¾÷°è Àü¹®°¡, ±â¼ú Á¦°ø¾÷ü, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÉÃþ ÀÎÅͺ䰡 Æ÷ÇԵ˴ϴÙ. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´ëÈ­¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÁýÁ¦ ¼±Åðú °ü·ÃµÈ ¾÷¹«Àû °úÁ¦, »õ·Î¿î ±â¼ú ¼±È£µµ, ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ ±âÁØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ±Ý¼Ó û¼Ò ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ ¹Ì·¡ÀÇ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁöħÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÙ½É ¿äÁ¡ ¹× Àü·«Àû Áß¿ä »çÇ× Á¤¸®

ÀÌ °æ¿µÁø ¿ä¾àÀº ±Ý¼Ó û¼Ò±â ±â¼úÀÇ ¿ªµ¿Àû ÀÎ »óȲ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» ÃßÃâÇϰí Àç·á Çõ½Å, ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ªÇÐ ¹× »õ·Î¿î ¹«¿ª Á¤Ã¥À¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ º¯È­¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃß¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ºÐ¼®Àº ¼±ÅÃÀûÀÌ°í °íÈ¿À²ÀÇ ±Ý¼Ó ȸ¼ö¸¦ ½ÇÇöÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î ±×·¡ÇÉ »êÈ­¹°, °íºÐÀÚ ¼öÁö, ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¸âºê·¹ÀÎ ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú °°Àº ÷´Ü ÈíÂø ¸ÅüÀÇ Á߿伺ÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖÀ½À» °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, 2025³â ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ¸·Î °ø±Þ¸Á º¹¿ø·Â°ú Àü·«Àû Á¶´ÞÀÌ »ç¾÷ °èȹÀÇ ÃÖÀü¼±¿¡ ºÎ»óÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀå : Àç·á À¯Çüº°

  • Ȱ¼ºÅº
  • »êÈ­ ±×·¡ÇÉ
  • Æú¸®¸Ó ¼öÁö
  • Á¦¿Ã¶óÀÌÆ®

Á¦9Àå ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀå : ±Ý¼Ó À¯Çüº°

  • ±¸¸®
  • ö
  • ´ÏÄÌ
  • ±Í±Ý¼Ó
    • ±Ý
    • ÆÈ¶óµã
    • ¹é±Ý
  • ¾Æ¿¬

Á¦10Àå ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀå : ±â¼úº°

  • ¹ÙÀÌ¿À ÈíÂø
  • ų·¹ÀÌÆ®
  • À̿±³È¯¼öÁö
    • À½À̿ ±³È¯
    • ¾çÀ̿ ±³È¯
  • ¸·¿©°ú

Á¦11Àå ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀå : À¯Åë ä³Îº°

  • Á÷Á¢ ÆÇ¸Å
  • À¯Åë¾÷ü
  • ¿Â¶óÀΠä³Î

Á¦12Àå ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ ¾÷°èº°

  • È­ÇРó¸®
  • ½Äǰ ¹× À½·á
  • ¼®À¯ ¹× °¡½º
  • ÀǾàǰ
  • ¼öó¸®

Á¦13Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦14Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦15Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ±Ý¼Ó Æ÷ÂøÁ¦ ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦16Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • SiliCycle Inc.
    • Johnson Matthey PLC.
    • Albemarle Corporation
    • Arkema S.A.
    • BASF SE
    • Biotage AB
    • DPS Inc
    • Ecolab Inc.
    • Fuji Silysia Chemical Ltd.
    • Merck KGaA.
    • Nexgen Purifications
    • PhosphonicS Ltd.
    • The Dow Chemical Company
    • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Á¦17Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦18Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃÆ®

Á¦20Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦21Àå ºÎ·Ï

LSH 25.09.12

The Metal Scavenger Market was valued at USD 2.59 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.73 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.67%, reaching USD 3.61 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 2.59 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 2.73 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 3.61 billion
CAGR (%) 5.67%

Metal scavenging has emerged as a critical process for recovering valuable metals from industrial effluents and byproducts. In recent years, the convergence of environmental regulations and rising raw material costs has intensified the focus on efficient recovery techniques. As companies seek to optimize resource utilization and reduce waste, metal scavenger technologies are playing an increasingly strategic role across multiple sectors. Moreover, the evolution of advanced materials such as activated carbon and graphene oxide has opened new avenues for achieving higher extraction efficiencies with lower energy footprints.

In addition, shifts in industrial practices are driving demand for more selective and robust scavenger systems. The integration of membrane-based filtration and ion exchange chemistries has enabled precise targeting of specific metal ions, thereby minimizing cross-contamination and streamlining downstream processing. Concurrently, growing awareness of circular economy principles is prompting stakeholders to embed sustainable metal recovery protocols within their operations, thereby generating both environmental and economic benefits.

Furthermore, ongoing research into biotechnological approaches such as biosorption and chelation is reshaping the expectations for scalability and cost-effectiveness. These innovative solutions offer reduced chemical consumption and enhanced biodegradability, aligning with stringent regulatory standards around effluent discharge. Consequently, the metal scavenger landscape is poised for continued expansion, supported by collaborative efforts among technology providers, end users and regulatory bodies.

As competition intensifies, differentiation through proprietary materials and process optimization has become a focal point for manufacturers. Partnerships between leading chemical producers and membrane technologists are fostering synergistic innovations that can adapt to fluctuating metal concentrations. At the same time, digital monitoring and real-time analytics are enhancing process control, enabling predictive maintenance and ensuring consistent output quality. These converging trends underscore the vital importance of metal scavengers in safeguarding supply chain resilience and advancing sustainability targets across industries.

Assessing Technological Advancements and Regulatory Shifts Driving Transformative Changes in Metal Scavenging Processes and Competitive Positioning

Innovation within metal scavenging is accelerating at an unprecedented pace, driven by both technological breakthroughs and evolving regulatory landscapes. Advanced nanomaterials such as graphene oxide have demonstrated exceptional adsorption capacities, prompting a reassessment of traditional activated carbon benchmarks. Meanwhile, polymeric resins engineered with tailored functional groups are achieving heightened selectivity for critical metals like copper and nickel, thereby reducing the dependency on energy-intensive pyrometallurgical processes. As a result, the industry is witnessing a shift towards hybrid systems that combine membrane filtration with chelation or biosorption, delivering enhanced performance while curtailing operating costs.

Concurrently, the tightening of environmental regulations across major economies is catalyzing demand for zero-liquid discharge solutions. Regulators are mandating lower permissible metal concentrations in effluents, compelling companies to adopt more sophisticated scavenger technologies to remain compliant. Consequently, ion exchange resins, including both anionic and cationic variants, are gaining traction in sectors where trace metal removal is critical, such as pharmaceuticals and water treatment. In parallel, the drive towards digital transformation is reshaping operational frameworks, with real-time sensors and machine learning algorithms optimizing adsorption cycles and enabling proactive maintenance.

Furthermore, sustainability imperatives are fostering collaborations between chemical producers and biotechnology firms, leading to next-generation biosorption platforms that leverage microbial or plant-based matrices. These biologically derived systems offer lower carbon footprints and potential for material regeneration, aligning with broader corporate social responsibility goals. Additionally, organizations are increasingly integrating life cycle assessment frameworks to quantify the environmental impact of their scavenger systems. These insights are guiding procurement decisions and enabling the selection of materials that balance performance with end-of-life recyclability. As the landscape evolves, firms that leverage digital twins to simulate process scenarios will gain a strategic edge, ensuring continuous optimization of their metal recovery operations.

Analyzing the Cumulative Impact of 2025 United States Tariffs on Metal Recovery Operations Supply Chains and Economic Viability

In early 2025, the introduction of new tariff measures on imported raw materials within the United States has had a significant ripple effect on metal scavenging operations. These duties, while intended to bolster domestic manufacturing, have increased the cost basis for specialized adsorbents and membrane components sourced internationally. As suppliers navigate higher input expenses, clients are reassessing their procurement strategies for sorbents ranging from polymeric resins to advanced activated carbons. Consequently, some end users have accelerated efforts to qualify alternative materials that can be produced onshore or sourced through exempted trade agreements, thereby mitigating exposure to tariff-related price volatility.

Moreover, the revised tariff landscape has prompted strategic realignments in the supply chain, with greater emphasis on nearshoring partnerships and regional distribution hubs. This transition is supported by enhanced collaboration between distributors and direct sales channels seeking to localize inventories. In parallel, research and development initiatives are being fast-tracked to innovate lower-cost synthesis routes for ion exchange media and chelation polymers. These initiatives underscore the broader industry drive for cost containment without compromising adsorption performance.

Furthermore, importers are exploring opportunities to leverage bonded warehouses and tariff engineering to optimize landed costs. By reconfiguring supply agreements and renegotiating freight terms, stakeholders aim to preserve margin structures amid evolving trade policies. Parallel discussions are underway regarding the recovery of precious metals such as gold, palladium and platinum, where the cost sensitivity is magnified. Tariff-induced price shifts are accelerating the adoption of membrane filtration systems with higher selectivity, as organizations seek to maximize the value extracted per unit of sorbent. In turn, this has catalyzed partnerships between technology providers and end users within sectors like chemical processing and pharmaceuticals to pilot next-generation chelation and biosorption methods under domestic manufacturing frameworks. As a result, the metal scavenger sector is adapting with a renewed focus on supply chain resilience, strategic sourcing and process innovation to navigate the ongoing tariff-driven challenges.

Revealing Key Segmentation Insights into Material Types Metal Categories Technologies Distribution Channels and End User Industries

Material diversity in the scavenger market underpins a wide range of recovery strategies tailored to specific operational requirements. Based on material type, systems comprising activated carbon excel at broad-spectrum adsorption, whereas graphene oxide offers exceptional surface area for trace metal uptake. Polymeric resins provide customizable binding sites that can be engineered for cationic or anionic selectivity, while zeolites deliver robust thermal stability in high-temperature applications. These distinctions empower end users to align scavenger media with feed compositions and process constraints, achieving optimized extraction yields.

In parallel, metal type considerations are influencing technology choices. Copper and iron, with their high volumetric presence, often leverage ion exchange resins for bulk removal, whereas nickel recovery benefits from a combination of biosorption and chelation methodologies that target specific oxidation states. Precious metals such as gold, palladium and platinum command premium scavenger solutions due to their high value, driving investments in membrane filtration and specialty sorbents that minimize product losses. Zinc recovery, meanwhile, frequently integrates cost-effective adsorbents to handle moderate concentrations within wastewater streams.

Furthermore, technology segmentation reveals distinct adoption patterns. Biosorption is gaining momentum in industries with moderate purity requirements, whereas chelation agents are favored for complex matrices in pharmaceuticals. The ion exchange resin segment, which encompasses both anion exchange and cation exchange modalities, remains a backbone for high-throughput operations. Membrane filtration platforms are increasingly being deployed in concert with other methods to deliver multi-stage separation and concentration, improving overall process efficiency.

Distribution channels are evolving alongside end user preferences. Direct sales relationships offer tailored support for large-scale installations, distributors facilitate rapid availability of standard sorbents, and online channels are emerging for niche chemical orders. End users across chemical processing, food and beverage, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals and water treatment industries are thus able to select delivery models that align with project timelines and service expectations.

Identifying Regional Trends and Market Drivers Influencing Metal Scavenger Adoption across Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia Pacific

In the Americas, regulatory frameworks emphasizing stricter effluent discharge limits have accelerated the adoption of advanced scavenger solutions. North American chemical processing and water treatment facilities are integrating hybrid systems that combine ion exchange and membrane filtration to comply with environmental mandates, while leveraging domestic supply sources to manage costs. Furthermore, partnerships between local distributors and direct sales teams ensure rapid deployment of sorbent materials to meet project timelines.

Across Europe, Middle East and Africa, the confluence of stringent environmental regulations in the European Union and growing infrastructure investments in emerging markets is driving diverse demand patterns. Western European suspended solids and metal concentration targets are catalyzing investments in polymeric resins with high selectivity, whereas the Middle East region, fueled by oil and gas sector growth, is prioritizing robust zeolite-based scavengers for high-temperature operations. In Africa, the expansion of mining activities has spurred interest in biosorption platforms that can adapt to varying feed compositions at remote sites.

In Asia-Pacific, the rapid industrialization of economies such as China and India has heightened the focus on sustainable resource recovery to address water scarcity and environmental impact. Manufacturers are implementing scalable membrane filtration modules integrated with real-time monitoring systems to optimize metal removal processes. Additionally, joint ventures between local technology firms and global innovators are facilitating the transfer of advanced chelation and ion exchange capabilities, thereby advancing domestic production and reducing reliance on imported media.

Evaluating the Competitive Landscape Highlighting Leading Players Strategic Partnerships Innovations and Growth Initiatives in Metal Scavenging

The competitive landscape in the metal scavenger sector is characterized by strategic alliances, product innovations and consolidation among key players. Leading chemical suppliers are expanding their portfolios through research partnerships with membrane technology specialists, resulting in next-generation sorbents that balance high adsorption capacity with ease of regeneration. Moreover, select firms are investing in pilot plants to validate proprietary polymeric resins under industrial conditions, thereby accelerating time-to-market.

Simultaneously, technology incumbents are pursuing mergers and acquisitions to enhance their geographic footprint and distribution capabilities. By integrating smaller biosorption and chelation innovators, major enterprises are diversifying their solution offerings and addressing end user demands across multiple industries including pharmaceuticals, oil and gas and water treatment. This consolidation trend is enabling economies of scale in manufacturing and research, ultimately driving incremental improvements in performance and cost reduction.

Innovation hubs within the sector are also fostering the development of digital process control platforms that integrate sensor-driven analytics with sorbent lifecycle management. These platforms provide real-time data on adsorption kinetics, enabling predictive maintenance and reducing operational downtime. Partnerships between data analytics firms and sorbent manufacturers are thus yielding comprehensive service models that extend beyond material supply to include performance optimization and consultancy.

Furthermore, a growing number of players are focusing on sustainability as a competitive differentiator. Investments in biodegradable biosorbents and closed-loop regeneration processes are creating new value propositions for environmentally conscious end users. As market dynamics continue to evolve, organizations that leverage integrated service offerings and maintain a strong innovation pipeline are positioned to capture emerging opportunities in the global metal scavenger space.

Offering Actionable Recommendations and Strategic Roadmap for Industry Leaders to Enhance Metal Recovery Efficiencies Profitability and Regulatory Compliance

Industry leaders should prioritize the development of modular metal scavenger platforms that can be rapidly configured to address changing feed compositions and regulatory requirements. By adopting a platform-based approach, organizations can streamline their research and development cycles and accelerate the deployment of tailored adsorption solutions across multiple end user industries. Additionally, integrating sensor-driven analytics with these platforms will enhance process visibility, enabling proactive adjustments and minimizing performance deviations.

In tandem, establishing collaborative partnerships with regional suppliers can bolster supply chain agility and reduce exposure to tariff-induced cost pressures. Such partnerships should focus on joint research initiatives aimed at localizing the production of critical sorbent components, including advanced polymeric resins and specialized zeolite formulations. This approach will enhance resiliency in the face of evolving trade policies and logistical disruptions.

Moreover, companies are advised to invest in circular economy practices by implementing regeneration protocols that recover and recycle spent sorbents. Deploying on-site regeneration systems not only mitigates waste management expenses but also aligns with sustainability mandates and corporate social responsibility goals. This, in turn, can unlock new revenue streams through the sale of recycled sorbent materials or regenerated media.

Finally, leaders must engage proactively with policymakers and standard-setting bodies to shape realistic environmental guidelines that balance performance expectations with operational feasibility. By contributing technical expertise to the regulatory dialogue, firms can ensure that metal scavenger requirements are attainable and conducive to broad adoption. These strategic initiatives will position companies to capitalize on growth opportunities while advancing environmental stewardship within the metal recovery domain.

Detailing Rigorous Research Methodology Combining Primary Interviews Secondary Research and Analytical Techniques Ensuring Data Integrity and Accuracy

The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines rigorous primary and secondary research techniques designed to ensure accuracy, comprehensiveness and relevance. Primary research included in-depth interviews with industry experts, technology providers and end users representing chemical processing, pharmaceuticals and water treatment sectors. These conversations provided firsthand insights into operational challenges, emerging technology preferences and decision-making criteria related to metal scavenger selection.

Secondary research involved a thorough review of technical journals, industry publications and regulatory documents. Detailed examination of patent databases and white papers was conducted to trace innovation trajectories in sorbent materials and separation technologies. Additionally, trade association reports and governmental guidelines were analyzed to contextualize the policy environment and compliance requirements affecting metal recovery processes.

Data triangulation was achieved by cross-referencing qualitative interview findings with quantitative indicators from academic studies and industrial case examples. This approach enabled validation of observed trends, such as the increasing uptake of membrane filtration modules and the evolution of biosorption platforms. Furthermore, the integration of lifecycle assessment frameworks provided a lens to evaluate the environmental implications of various scavenger technologies.

Analytical techniques included SWOT analyses of key segments, benchmarking exercises to assess performance differentials among materials and technologies, and scenario planning to explore the impact of regulatory changes and trade policies. Throughout the research process, stringent quality controls were applied to ensure data integrity and mitigate biases, resulting in a robust foundation for the insights and recommendations presented in this executive summary.

Summarizing Key Takeaways Conclusions and Strategic Imperatives to Guide Future Decisions in the Evolving Metal Scavenging Landscape

This executive summary has distilled critical insights into the dynamic landscape of metal scavenger technologies, highlighting transformative shifts driven by material innovations, regulatory dynamics and emerging trade policies. The analysis underscores the growing importance of advanced sorbent media such as graphene oxide, polymeric resins and hybrid membrane systems in achieving selective, high-efficiency metal recovery. Additionally, the influence of the 2025 United States tariffs has brought supply chain resilience and strategic sourcing to the forefront of operational planning.

Segmentation analysis reveals that material type, metal categories, technological approaches, distribution channels and end user industries each shape distinct adoption patterns and performance expectations. Regional perspectives illustrate varied demand drivers across the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa, as well as the Asia-Pacific region, where rapid industrialization and environmental mandates are catalyzing innovation. The competitive landscape is characterized by targeted partnerships, mergers and acquisitions, and a growing emphasis on digital process control and sustainability as key differentiators.

Looking ahead, actionable recommendations emphasize the importance of modular platform development, localized production strategies, circular economy integration and proactive regulatory engagement. By implementing these strategic initiatives, industry participants can navigate evolving market pressures and capitalize on the expanding opportunities within the metal recovery ecosystem. Ultimately, the convergence of technological ingenuity, policy support and collaborative partnerships will determine the trajectory of this critical industry segment.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Growing demand for biodegradable chelating agents in precious metal extraction processes
  • 5.2. Integration of real-time sensor networks for optimized metal ion recovery in industrial wastewater treatment
  • 5.3. Surge in investment towards low-cost hydrometallurgical technologies for battery scrap metal scavenging
  • 5.4. Advancement of selective adsorption membranes to enhance rare earth element recovery from e-waste
  • 5.5. Emergence of AI-driven predictive maintenance systems to reduce downtime in metal scavenging equipment
  • 5.6. Increasing focus on circular economy initiatives driving partnerships between recyclers and metal scavenger suppliers

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Metal Scavenger Market, by Material Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Activated Carbon
  • 8.3. Graphene Oxide
  • 8.4. Polymeric Resins
  • 8.5. Zeolites

9. Metal Scavenger Market, by Metal Type

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Copper
  • 9.3. Iron
  • 9.4. Nickel
  • 9.5. Precious Metals
    • 9.5.1. Gold
    • 9.5.2. Palladium
    • 9.5.3. Platinum
  • 9.6. Zinc

10. Metal Scavenger Market, by Technology

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Biosorption
  • 10.3. Chelation
  • 10.4. Ion Exchange Resin
    • 10.4.1. Anion Exchange
    • 10.4.2. Cation Exchange
  • 10.5. Membrane Filtration

11. Metal Scavenger Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Direct Sales
  • 11.3. Distributors
  • 11.4. Online Channels

12. Metal Scavenger Market, by End User Industry

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Chemical Processing
  • 12.3. Food And Beverage
  • 12.4. Oil And Gas
  • 12.5. Pharmaceuticals
  • 12.6. Water Treatment

13. Americas Metal Scavenger Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. United States
  • 13.3. Canada
  • 13.4. Mexico
  • 13.5. Brazil
  • 13.6. Argentina

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Metal Scavenger Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. United Kingdom
  • 14.3. Germany
  • 14.4. France
  • 14.5. Russia
  • 14.6. Italy
  • 14.7. Spain
  • 14.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 14.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 14.10. South Africa
  • 14.11. Denmark
  • 14.12. Netherlands
  • 14.13. Qatar
  • 14.14. Finland
  • 14.15. Sweden
  • 14.16. Nigeria
  • 14.17. Egypt
  • 14.18. Turkey
  • 14.19. Israel
  • 14.20. Norway
  • 14.21. Poland
  • 14.22. Switzerland

15. Asia-Pacific Metal Scavenger Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. China
  • 15.3. India
  • 15.4. Japan
  • 15.5. Australia
  • 15.6. South Korea
  • 15.7. Indonesia
  • 15.8. Thailand
  • 15.9. Philippines
  • 15.10. Malaysia
  • 15.11. Singapore
  • 15.12. Vietnam
  • 15.13. Taiwan

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. SiliCycle Inc.
    • 16.3.2. Johnson Matthey PLC.
    • 16.3.3. Albemarle Corporation
    • 16.3.4. Arkema S.A.
    • 16.3.5. BASF SE
    • 16.3.6. Biotage AB
    • 16.3.7. DPS Inc
    • 16.3.8. Ecolab Inc.
    • 16.3.9. Fuji Silysia Chemical Ltd.
    • 16.3.10. Merck KGaA.
    • 16.3.11. Nexgen Purifications
    • 16.3.12. PhosphonicS Ltd.
    • 16.3.13. The Dow Chemical Company
    • 16.3.14. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

17. ResearchAI

18. ResearchStatistics

19. ResearchContacts

20. ResearchArticles

21. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦