½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1806359

DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå : ¼­ºñ½ºº°, ¼Ö·ç¼Ç ¿ÀÆÛ¸µº°, Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°, º¸¾È»ó ¿ì·Áº°, ¾÷°èº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market by Services, Solution Offerings, Organization Size, Security Concerns, Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 189 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡´Â 259¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇϸç, 2025³â¿¡´Â CAGR 19.41%·Î 308¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ¼ºÀåÇϸç, 2030³â±îÁö´Â 752¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ¿¬µµ 2024 259¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤¿¬µµ 2025 308¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø¿¬µµ 2030 752¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 19.41%

±â¾÷¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í Áß¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸ ÀÚ»êÀ» º¸È£ÇÏ´Â ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÎ µðÁöÅÐ ½Ã´ëÀÇ ¼­ºñ½ºÇü µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ÀÇ ºÎ»ó°ú ±× ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» Ž»ö

ÃÖ±Ù ¼ö³â°£ ´Ù¾çÇÑ »ê¾÷ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ±â¾÷ÀÌ µðÁöÅÐ Àüȯ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀ» ±× ¾î´À ¶§º¸´Ù °¡¼ÓÈ­Çϸ鼭 °­·ÂÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ä±¸°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¾÷ÀÌ ¿öÅ©·Îµå¸¦ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ȯ°æÀ¸·Î ÀÌÀüÇϰí, ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¸¦ µµÀÔÇϰí, °í±Þ Çù¾÷ Ç÷§ÆûÀ» äÅÃÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ¼öÁýµÇ´Â µ¥ÀÌÅÍÀÇ ¾ç°ú ±â¹Ð¼ºÀÌ ±âÇϱ޼öÀûÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹é¾÷ ¹× º¹±¸ ¸ðµ¨Àº ½Ç½Ã°£ Á¢±Ù¼º, µ¿Àû ½ºÄÉÀϸµ, ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ȯ°æ µî ÃֽŠÀ̽´¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ Àç°ËÅäµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ, ÀΰøÁö´É, ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä±¸»çÇ×ÀÌ ¼¼°è ±â¾÷ Àü¹ÝÀÇ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸¾È ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¿¡ ¾î¶² º¯È­¸¦ °¡Á®¿À°í Àִ°¡?

±Þ¼ÓÇÑ ±â¼ú Çõ½Å°ú ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹ÀÇ °¨½Ã °­È­·Î µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ȯ°æÀº Å©°Ô º¯È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¾÷Àº ´õ ÀÌ»ó Æ÷ÀÎÆ® ÀΠŸÀÓ ½º³À¼ôÀ̳ª Àå½Ã°£ÀÇ º¹¿ø ±â°£À» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ·¹°Å½Ã ¹é¾÷ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ¸¸Á·ÇÏÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù. ´ë½Å Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ³×ÀÌÆ¼ºê ¹× ÄÁÅ×ÀÌ³Ê È¯°æ°ú ¿øÈ°ÇÏ°Ô ÅëÇյǴ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ±â´É¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, º¥´õµéÀº ÀÌ»ó °¨Áö ÀÚµ¿È­, ¹é¾÷ ½ºÄÉÁÙ ÃÖÀûÈ­, ÀáÀçÀû Àå¾Ö ÁöÁ¡ »çÀü ¿¹ÃøÀ» À§ÇØ ÀΰøÁö´É°ú ¸Ó½Å·¯´×¿¡ ¸¹Àº ÅõÀÚ¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

2025³â ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼°¡ ±¹°æ °£ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó ¹× ¼­ºñ½º °ø±Þ¸Á¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÆÄ±Þ È¿°ú Æò°¡

2025³â ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ »õ·Î¿î °ü¼¼ Á¶Ä¡ µµÀÔÀº µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¸¦ Áö¿øÇÏ´Â ¼¼°è °ø±Þ¸Á¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½ºÅ丮Áö ¾î·¹ÀÌ¿Í ¹é¾÷ ¾îÇöóÀ̾𽺿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ Çϵå¿þ¾î ±¸¼º ¿ä¼ÒÀÇ °ü¼¼ ÀλóÀ¸·Î ¼­ºñ½º ÇÁ·Î¹ÙÀÌ´õµéÀº Á¶´Þ Àü·«À» Àç°ËÅäÇϰí Á¶´Þ °æ·Î¸¦ ´Ù¾çÈ­ÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´Â »óȲ¿¡ Á÷¸éÇØ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ÀϺΠº¥´õµéÀº ƯÇý ¹«¿ª ÇùÁ¤À» ¸ÎÀº Áö¿ªÀ¸·Î »ý»ê±âÁö¸¦ ÀÌÀüÇÏ¿© ºñ¿ë ºÎ´ãÀ» ¿ÏÈ­Çϰí Àåºñ ³³Ç°ÀÇ ¿¬¼Ó¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ÆÐÅÏ ÆÄ¾Ç ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨, ¼Ö·ç¼Ç ¹üÀ§, Á¶Á÷ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ, º¸¾È ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, »ê¾÷ ¿ëµµ µî ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨, ¼Ö·ç¼Ç ¹üÀ§, Á¶Á÷ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ, º¸¾È ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, »ê¾÷ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç °ø°³

½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­¸¦ »ó¼¼ÇÏ°Ô ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¸é ¼­ºñ½º Ä«Å×°í¸®º°·Î Â÷º°È­µÈ ¼ºÀå º¤Å͸¦ È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. BaaS(Backup as a Service) ¿µ¿ª¿¡¼­ ±â¾÷Àº ºü¸¥ º¹±¸ ±â´É°ú ÇÔ²² ¼¼ºÐÈ­µÈ º¹±¸ ÁöÁ¡ ¸ñÇ¥¸¦ ¿ä±¸Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, DAaaS(Data Archiving as a Service)´Â Àå±â º¸Á¸ ¹× ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠¾ÆÄ«À̺ù¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÐ Á¶Á÷µé »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ ÁöÁö¸¦ ¹Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Disaster Raas(Recovery as a Service)´Â ´Ù¿îŸÀÓÀ» °ÅÀÇ Á¦·Î¿¡ °¡±õ°Ô ÁÙ¿©ÁÖ´Â ¾×Ƽºê-¾×Ƽºê º¹Á¦(Active Active Replication)¿Í ÇÔ²² ¹øµé·Î Á¦°øµÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ´Ã°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, À̸ÞÀÏ/µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º´Â ¿£µåÅõ¿£µå Ű °ü¸®¿Í ¾ÈÀüÇÑ Çù¾÷À» Áö¿øÇϵµ·Ï ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Áö¿øÇϵµ·Ï ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿£µåÆ÷ÀÎÆ® µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº ³ëÆ®ºÏ»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ µð¹ÙÀ̽º ¹× IoT ¿£µåÆ÷ÀÎÆ®±îÁö ±× ¹üÀ§¸¦ ³ÐÇô°¡°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Raas(Replication as a Service) ¹èÆ÷¿¡¼­´Â µ¿±â ¹× ºñµ¿±â µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¹»çº»¿¡ ¼¼°è ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ÆÐºê¸¯ÀÌ È°¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. STaaS(Storage as a Service) ¸ðµ¨Àº Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î È®ÀåµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿öÅ©·Îµå ¼ö¿ä¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ ´Ü°èº° ¼º´É°ú ºñ¿ë ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹, À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø ¹× º¸±ÞÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â Áö¿ª ¿ªÇÐ Æò°¡

µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¼­ºñ½º Àü·«À» ¼ö¸³ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Áö¿ªÀû ¿ªÇÐÀº ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ºÏ¹Ì¿Í ³²¹Ì¿¡¼­´Â ¼º¼÷ÇÑ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ½ÃÀå°ú ¾ö°ÝÇÑ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸ º¸È£ ±ÔÁ¤À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ, °ø±ÞÀÚµéÀº ÅëÇÕµÈ ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠°ü¸®¿Í ¿øÈ°ÇÑ ¸ÖƼ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå »óÈ£¿î¿ë¼º¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃß¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ºÏ¹Ì ±â¾÷Àº ¹é¾÷, ÀçÇØº¹±¸, À§Çù °ü¸®¸¦ ´ÜÀÏ °ü¸® ÄַܼΠÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â ÅëÇÕ Ç÷§Æû äÅÃÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä« ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­´Â ÇöÁö ±â¼ú·Â ºÎÁ·À» ÇØ¼ÒÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¸Å´ÏÁöµå ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¼­ºñ½º ÇÁ·Î¹ÙÀÌ´õ¿Í Çõ½Å, ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê, °æÀïÀû Â÷º°È­¸¦ À§ÇÑ Àü·«Àû ±¸»ó ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϸµ

ÁÖ¿ä ¼­ºñ½º ÇÁ·Î¹ÙÀÌ´õµéÀº ±â¼ú Çõ½Å°ú Àü·«Àû ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» ÅëÇØ Â÷º°È­¸¦ ²ÒÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀϺΠ¼¼°è º¥´õµéÀº AI¸¦ ÅëÇÑ À§Çù °¨Áö¸¦ ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© Ç÷§Æû ±â´ÉÀ» È®ÀåÇϰí, ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ »ç°í ´ëÀÀ ¿öÅ©Ç÷ο츦 ÅëÇØ º¹±¸ ½Ã°£À» ´ÜÃàÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÇÏÀÌÆÛ½ºÄÉÀÏ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ÇÁ·Î¹ÙÀÌ´õ¿Í Á¦ÈÞÇÏ¿© ƯÁ¤ ÆÛºí¸¯ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ȯ°æ¿¡ ÃÖÀûÈ­µÈ ÅÏŰ º¸È£ ¹øµéÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â º¥´õµµ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±â¼ú ÅëÇÕ, ÄÄÇöóÀ̾ð½º, ¿î¿µ ¿ì¼ö¼ºÀ» ÅëÇØ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¿ª·®À» °­È­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ¾÷°è ÀÌÇØ °ü°èÀÚ¸¦ À§ÇÑ ½ÇÇà °¡´ÉÇÑ Àü·«

Á¡Á¡ ´õ º¹ÀâÇØÁö´Â ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ ¼º°øÇϱâ À§ÇØ ±â¾÷ ¸®´õµéÀº º¸´Ù ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ µðÁöÅÐ Àüȯ ¸ñÇ¥¿¡ ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â ÅëÇÕ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ Àü·«À» äÅÃÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¿ì¼± ¹é¾÷, º¹±¸, ¾Ïȣȭ, À§Çù °ü¸® ±â´ÉÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÑ ÅëÇÕ Ç÷§ÆûÀ» ±¸ÃàÇÏ¿© ¿î¿µÀ» °£¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ°í º¥´õÀÇ ³­¸³À» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ Á¤Ã¥ ½ÇÇà°ú AI ±â¹Ý ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®·¹À̼ÇÀ» ÅëÇØ Á¶Á÷Àº ¼öµ¿ °³ÀÔÀ» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ°í º¹±¸ ½Ã°£À» ´ÜÃàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¼­ºñ½º ȯ°æÀ» ÇìÃÄ ³ª°¡¾ß ÇÏ´Â ±â¾÷À» À§ÇÑ Àü·«Àû Çʼö ¿ä¼ÒµéÀ» °­Á¶ÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ Á¶»ç °á°úµéÀ» ÅëÇÕÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾àÀº ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â À§Çù »óȲ°ú º¯È­ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ȯ°æ¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ Ã·´Ü µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ µµÀÔÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù´Â Á¡À» °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. AI¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÑ ÀÌ»ó ¡ÈÄ °¨Áö ÅëÇÕºÎÅÍ °ü¼¼·Î ÀÎÇÑ ºñ¿ë ¾Ð¹Ú¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¼³°èµÈ À¯¿¬ÇÑ ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ µîÀå¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ±â¾÷Àº Àüü µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼ö¸íÁÖ±âÀ» Æ÷°ýÇÏ´Â Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ º¸È£ Àü·«À» äÅÃÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå °³¿ä

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå : ¼­ºñ½ºº°

  • BaaS(Backup as a Service)
  • DAaaS(Data Archiving as a Service)
  • DRaaS(Disaster Recovery as a Service)
  • À̸ÞÀÏ/µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º
  • ¿£µåÆ÷ÀÎÆ® µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£
  • Replication as a Service
  • STaaS(Storage as a Service)

Á¦9Àå DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå : ¼Ö·ç¼Ç ¿ÀÆÛ¸µº°

  • µ¥ÀÌÅÍ À¯Ãâ ¹æÁö
  • ÀçÇØ º¹±¸
  • ½Å¿ø°ú ¾×¼¼½º °ü¸®
  • ÅëÇÕ À§Çù °ü¸®

Á¦10Àå DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå : Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°

  • ´ë±â¾÷
  • Áß±Ô¸ð ±â¾÷
  • Áß¼Ò±â¾÷

Á¦11Àå DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå : º¸¾È»ó ¿ì·Áº°

  • »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È À§Çù
  • µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Ä§ÇØ
  • ¸Ö¿þ¾î¿Í ·£¼¶¿þ¾î
  • ÇÇ½Ì °ø°Ý

Á¦12Àå DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå : ¾÷°èº°

  • ÀºÇà, ±ÝÀ¶ ¼­ºñ½º, º¸Çè
  • Á¤ºÎ¿Í ¹æÀ§
  • ÇコÄɾî
  • IT¡¤Åë½Å
  • Á¦Á¶¾÷
  • ¼Ò¸Å¡¤¼ÒºñÀç

Á¦13Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦14Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦15Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ DPaaS(Data-Protection-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦16Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024³â
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024³â
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • Acronis International GmbH
    • Amazon Web Services, Inc.
    • Arcserve, LLC
    • Asigra Inc.
    • Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • Clarip Inc.
    • Code42 Software, Inc.
    • Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
    • Commvault Systems, Inc.
    • Dell Inc.
    • Druva Inc.
    • Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
    • Hitachi Vantara Corporation
    • HYCU, Inc.
    • Imperva, Inc.
    • Infrascale Inc.
    • International Business Machines Corporation
    • Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
    • McAfee, LLC
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • NetApp, Inc.
    • NxtGen Datacenter & Cloud Technologies Private Limited
    • Open Text Corporation
    • Oracle Corporation
    • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
    • Privaon Oy
    • Protegrity Corporation by Xcelera Inc.
    • Quantum Corporation
    • Quest Software Inc.
    • SentinelOne, Inc.
    • T-Systems International GmbH
    • Veritas Storage(Ireland) Limited
    • VMware, Inc.

Á¦17Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦18Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃ

Á¦20Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦21Àå ºÎ·Ï

KSA

The Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market was valued at USD 25.94 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 30.87 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 19.41%, reaching USD 75.23 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 25.94 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 30.87 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 75.23 billion
CAGR (%) 19.41%

Navigating the Rise of Data Protection as a Service in a Dynamic Digital Era Impacting Enterprises and Securing Critical Information Assets

In recent years, enterprises across industries have witnessed an unprecedented surge in digital transformation initiatives, driving a critical need for robust data protection frameworks. As organizations migrate workloads to cloud environments, deploy hybrid infrastructures, and embrace sophisticated collaboration platforms, the volume and sensitivity of captured data have grown exponentially. Consequently, traditional backup and recovery models are being reimagined to address modern challenges such as real-time accessibility, dynamic scaling, and evolving regulatory landscapes.

Against this backdrop, Data Protection as a Service has emerged as a pivotal enabler for enterprises striving to balance agility with security. By leveraging cloud-native architectures and managed service ecosystems, organizations can offload complex operational burdens while maintaining stringent compliance requirements. This paradigm shift not only reduces capital expenditure on in-house infrastructure but also provides on-demand scalability and resilience that align with continuous business operations.

Moreover, as organizations contend with sophisticated threat vectors and increasingly stringent data privacy regulations, the need for unified, vendor-agnostic protection strategies has never been more pronounced. The convergence of backup, disaster recovery, encryption, and threat management into integrated service offerings is setting a new standard for data reliability. This introduction establishes the context for understanding how Data Protection as a Service can fortify enterprise environments, mitigate evolving risks, and deliver measurable business value.

How Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, and Regulatory Demands Are Transforming Data Security Service Offerings Across Global Enterprises

The data protection landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by rapid technological innovation and heightened regulatory scrutiny. Organizations are no longer content with legacy backup solutions that offer point-in-time snapshots and protracted restore windows. Instead, there is growing demand for continuous data protection capabilities that seamlessly integrate with cloud-native and containerized environments. Consequently, vendors are investing heavily in artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate anomaly detection, optimize backup schedules, and predict potential failure points before they manifest.

Furthermore, the widespread adoption of remote and distributed work models has accelerated the decentralization of data stores. In response, service providers are extending endpoint data protection and secure file-sharing mechanisms to ensure that critical information remains safeguarded irrespective of user location. Simultaneously, regulatory mandates such as enhanced data residency and breach-notification requirements are compelling organizations to adopt encryption services and stringent access controls. As service offerings evolve, we see the rise of identity-driven protection models, delivering granular visibility into user activity and enabling zero-trust architectures.

In addition, strategic alliances between cloud hyperscalers and specialized data protection firms are reshaping the competitive landscape. These partnerships are yielding unified platforms that combine backup, recovery, replication, and threat management under a single pane of glass. As a result, enterprises benefit from streamlined procurement processes, reduced integration risk, and accelerated time to value. Looking ahead, these transformative shifts will continue to redefine how organizations architect, manage, and optimize their data protection strategies.

Assessing the Ripple Effects of United States Tariffs in 2025 on Cross-Border Data Protection Infrastructure and Service Supply Chains

The introduction of new tariff measures by the United States in 2025 has reverberated across global supply chains that underpin data protection infrastructure. Hardware components essential for storage arrays and backup appliances have experienced increased duties, prompting service providers to reassess procurement strategies and diversify sourcing corridors. As a result, some vendors are relocating manufacturing footprints to regions with preferential trade agreements, thereby mitigating cost pressures and ensuring continuity of equipment delivery.

Aside from hardware implications, software licensing models have been indirectly affected. Higher import tariffs on server hardware have translated into elevated total cost of ownership for on-premises deployments. Consequently, many enterprises are accelerating their shift toward cloud-based protection services, seeking to avoid capital expenditure volatility and benefit from predictable operating expense models. This trend has been particularly evident among midsize and large organizations that prioritize budget stability and strategic planning.

Moreover, the tariff environment has spurred innovation in service packaging. Providers are bundling encryption, replication, and disaster recovery capabilities in software-defined offerings that minimize reliance on specialized hardware. This approach not only reduces exposure to trade-related cost fluctuations but also enhances deployment flexibility across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. As tariff policies continue to evolve, stakeholders must remain vigilant, adapting procurement, pricing, and partnership strategies to maintain service excellence and competitive positioning.

Uncovering Key Market Segmentation Patterns in Data Protection Services Revealing Service Models, Solutions Scope, Organizational Profiles, Security Drivers, and Industry Applications

An in-depth analysis of market segmentation reveals differentiated growth vectors across service categories. Within the realm of Backup as a Service, enterprises seek granular recovery point objectives combined with rapid restore capabilities, while Data Archiving as a Service is gaining traction among organizations focused on long-term retention and compliance archival. Disaster Recovery as a Service offerings are increasingly bundled with active-active replication to ensure near-zero downtime, and Email/Data Encryption Services are evolving to support end-to-end key management and secure collaboration. Endpoint Data Protection solutions are extending coverage beyond laptops to mobile devices and IoT endpoints, whereas Replication as a Service deployments leverage global network fabrics for synchronous and asynchronous data copying. Storage as a Service models continue to expand, offering tiered performance and cost profiles suited to varied workload demands.

Turning to solution offerings, data loss prevention platforms are being enhanced with behavioral analytics to detect insider threats, while disaster recovery solutions integrate orchestration engines that automate failover workflows. Identity & Access Management suites are merging with privileged access modules to support zero-trust frameworks, and Unified Threat Management systems are embedding backup integration points to streamline incident response.

The characteristics of end users also influence service adoption. Large enterprises demand complex, multi-layered protection strategies that incorporate custom SLAs, whereas medium enterprises prioritize turnkey solutions that balance functionality with ease of deployment. Small enterprises often opt for fully managed packages that minimize internal resource burdens.

Security concerns shape buyer preferences, as the prevalence of advanced cybersecurity threats drives demand for proactive breach prevention, and a surge in data breaches underscores the importance of encryption and multi-factor authentication. Malware & ransomware attacks are steering interest toward immutable storage and air-gap replication, while phishing attack trends are prompting tighter email filtering and user training integrations.

Finally, adoption patterns vary across industry verticals. Banking, Financial Services, & Insurance firms focus on robust audit trails and regulatory compliance, Government & Defense entities emphasize data sovereignty and secure communication channels, Healthcare organizations require HIPAA-aligned retention and encryption, IT & Telecommunication providers integrate protection into service delivery, Manufacturing operations look for minimal disruption to industrial control systems, and Retail & Consumer Goods companies prioritize high-availability platforms to support e-commerce and point-of-sale continuity.

Evaluating Regional Dynamics Shaping the Delivery and Adoption of Data Protection Services Across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific Markets

Regional dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping data protection service strategies. In the Americas, a mature cloud market and stringent privacy regulations have driven providers to focus on integrated compliance controls and seamless multi-cloud interoperability. Enterprises in North America are increasingly adopting unified platforms that combine backup, disaster recovery, and threat management under single management consoles, while Latin American markets show growing interest in managed service models to alleviate local skills shortages.

Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, data sovereignty and regulatory complexity are primary considerations. The General Data Protection Regulation has set a high bar for privacy, prompting vendors to offer region-specific data residency options and granular data access controls. Governments and defense agencies in the Middle East are opting for on-premises or private cloud deployments to maintain strict control, even as Western European enterprises embrace hybrid architectures that balance local compliance with global scalability.

In Asia-Pacific, digital infrastructure investments are accelerating, with several economies investing heavily in national cloud initiatives and smart city programs. Service providers are tailoring offerings to accommodate diverse maturity levels, from advanced markets demanding integrated AI-driven protection to emerging markets prioritizing basic backup as a service capabilities. Moreover, the prevalence of cross-border data flows in this region has heightened demand for encryption and secure replication solutions, ensuring that enterprises can leverage regional growth opportunities while safeguarding critical assets.

Profiling Leading Data Protection Service Providers and Their Strategic Initiatives Driving Innovation, Partnerships, and Competitive Differentiation

Leading service providers are distinguishing themselves through a combination of technological innovation and strategic partnerships. Several global vendors have expanded their platform capabilities by integrating AI-driven threat detection, enabling automated incident response workflows that reduce recovery time objectives. Others have forged alliances with hyperscale cloud providers to deliver turnkey protection bundles optimized for specific public cloud environments.

In addition, some companies are investing in purpose-built hardware accelerators within their service offerings to enhance backup throughput and encryption performance. These innovations are complemented by the development of unified management consoles that provide real-time visibility across on-premises, edge, and cloud assets. Furthermore, forward-looking firms are establishing regional data centers to meet local regulatory demands while ensuring low-latency replication and disaster recovery.

Partnership ecosystems are also evolving, as vendors collaborate with cybersecurity specialists to integrate advanced threat intelligence feeds into data protection workflows. This convergence of backup and security operations has given rise to solutions capable of automated ransomware isolation and self-healing recovery. Ultimately, the competitive landscape is being shaped by organizations that can deliver comprehensive, adaptive platforms while maintaining a relentless focus on customer success and operational resiliency.

Actionable Strategies for Industry Stakeholders to Enhance Data Protection Capabilities Through Technology Integration, Compliance, and Operational Excellence

To thrive in an increasingly complex environment, enterprise leaders must adopt an integrated data protection strategy that aligns with broader digital transformation objectives. First, establishing a unified platform that consolidates backup, recovery, encryption, and threat management capabilities will streamline operations and reduce vendor sprawl. By leveraging automated policy enforcement and AI-driven orchestration, organizations can minimize manual intervention and accelerate time to recovery.

Next, aligning protection services with compliance mandates and data residency requirements is essential. Organizations should perform periodic audits of their data flows and collaborate with service providers to implement granular access controls and encryption key management. In parallel, cultivating a culture of shared responsibility between IT, security, and business units will ensure that data protection priorities are embedded across organizational processes.

Moreover, leaders should explore strategic alliances with hyperscale cloud providers to benefit from native integration and predictable cost structures. Adopting a hybrid or multi-cloud approach can mitigate vendor lock-in while enabling geographic redundancy. Finally, investing in continuous training and tabletop exercises will enhance incident response readiness, equipping teams to respond swiftly to evolving threat vectors and ensuring business continuity.

The findings presented in this report are derived from a rigorous research methodology combining qualitative and quantitative techniques. Primary engagements involved interviews with senior IT and security executives across diverse industries, enabling a deep understanding of strategic priorities and pain points. These insights were complemented by expert discussions with solution architects, channel partners, and regulatory specialists to validate emerging trends and technological advancements.

Secondary research encompassed a comprehensive review of white papers, industry journals, and regulatory frameworks. Publicly available information, vendor documentation, and trade publications were systematically analyzed to map competitive landscapes and partnership ecosystems. Additionally, data validation processes were employed to cross-check key thematic insights against multiple sources, ensuring analytical robustness.

Scenario analysis was conducted to assess the impact of macroeconomic factors such as tariff changes, regulatory shifts, and technological breakthroughs. This multi-dimensional approach ensures that the report's conclusions are both actionable and reflective of real-world dynamics, providing stakeholders with the confidence to make informed strategic decisions.

Synthesis of Critical Findings Highlighting Strategic Imperatives for Enterprises Navigating the Evolving Data Protection Service Landscape

This executive summary underscores the critical importance of adopting advanced data protection services in response to an evolving threat landscape and shifting regulatory environment. From the integration of AI-powered anomaly detection to the emergence of flexible service models designed to counteract tariff-induced cost pressures, organizations must embrace holistic protection strategies that span the entire data lifecycle.

Key segmentation analyses reveal that enterprises of all sizes and industries are moving toward unified platforms that offer comprehensive coverage, while regional insights highlight the necessity of localized compliance and performance optimization. Furthermore, competitive benchmarking illustrates how leading service providers are differentiating through innovation, strategic alliances, and tailored regional offerings.

Ultimately, the path forward for enterprises involves establishing strategic partnerships, consolidating disparate protection tools into cohesive frameworks, and embedding data resilience into their broader digital transformation agendas. By proactively addressing security concerns, compliance requirements, and operational resiliency, organizations can not only safeguard critical information but also unlock new opportunities for growth and innovation.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Investment in hybrid data protection architectures combining on-premise and cloud solutions
  • 5.2. Development of specialized solutions for protecting sensitive healthcare data
  • 5.3. Advancement of scalable and customizable data-protection platforms for diverse industries
  • 5.4. Adoption of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and transparency
  • 5.5. Growing importance of cross-border data protection amid evolving international laws
  • 5.6. Increasing emphasis on data privacy and encryption technologies in service offerings
  • 5.7. Expansion of data-protection services tailored for small and medium-sized businesses
  • 5.8. Integration of zero-trust security models within data-protection-as-a-service frameworks
  • 5.9. Growing demand for cloud-based data-protection as a service solutions among enterprises
  • 5.10. Increasing adoption of AI and machine learning for enhanced data protection capabilities

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market, by Services

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Backup as a Service (BaaS)
  • 8.3. Data Archiving as a Service
  • 8.4. Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)
  • 8.5. Email/Data Encryption Services
  • 8.6. Endpoint Data Protection
  • 8.7. Replication as a Service
  • 8.8. Storage as a Service (STaaS)

9. Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market, by Solution Offerings

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Data Loss Prevention
  • 9.3. Disaster Recovery
  • 9.4. Identity & Access Management
  • 9.5. Unified Threat Management

10. Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market, by Organization Size

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Large Enterprises
  • 10.3. Medium Enterprises
  • 10.4. Small Enterprises

11. Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market, by Security Concerns

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Cybersecurity Threats
  • 11.3. Data Breaches
  • 11.4. Malware & Ransomware
  • 11.5. Phishing Attacks

12. Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market, by Industry Vertical

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Banking, Financial Services, & Insurance
  • 12.3. Government & Defense
  • 12.4. Healthcare
  • 12.5. IT & Telecommunication
  • 12.6. Manufacturing
  • 12.7. Retail & Consumer Goods

13. Americas Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. United States
  • 13.3. Canada
  • 13.4. Mexico
  • 13.5. Brazil
  • 13.6. Argentina

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. United Kingdom
  • 14.3. Germany
  • 14.4. France
  • 14.5. Russia
  • 14.6. Italy
  • 14.7. Spain
  • 14.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 14.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 14.10. South Africa
  • 14.11. Denmark
  • 14.12. Netherlands
  • 14.13. Qatar
  • 14.14. Finland
  • 14.15. Sweden
  • 14.16. Nigeria
  • 14.17. Egypt
  • 14.18. Turkey
  • 14.19. Israel
  • 14.20. Norway
  • 14.21. Poland
  • 14.22. Switzerland

15. Asia-Pacific Data-Protection-as-a-Service Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. China
  • 15.3. India
  • 15.4. Japan
  • 15.5. Australia
  • 15.6. South Korea
  • 15.7. Indonesia
  • 15.8. Thailand
  • 15.9. Philippines
  • 15.10. Malaysia
  • 15.11. Singapore
  • 15.12. Vietnam
  • 15.13. Taiwan

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Acronis International GmbH
    • 16.3.2. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
    • 16.3.3. Arcserve, LLC
    • 16.3.4. Asigra Inc.
    • 16.3.5. Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • 16.3.6. Clarip Inc.
    • 16.3.7. Code42 Software, Inc.
    • 16.3.8. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
    • 16.3.9. Commvault Systems, Inc.
    • 16.3.10. Dell Inc.
    • 16.3.11. Druva Inc.
    • 16.3.12. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
    • 16.3.13. Hitachi Vantara Corporation
    • 16.3.14. HYCU, Inc.
    • 16.3.15. Imperva, Inc.
    • 16.3.16. Infrascale Inc.
    • 16.3.17. International Business Machines Corporation
    • 16.3.18. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
    • 16.3.19. McAfee, LLC
    • 16.3.20. Microsoft Corporation
    • 16.3.21. NetApp, Inc.
    • 16.3.22. NxtGen Datacenter & Cloud Technologies Private Limited
    • 16.3.23. Open Text Corporation
    • 16.3.24. Oracle Corporation
    • 16.3.25. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
    • 16.3.26. Privaon Oy
    • 16.3.27. Protegrity Corporation by Xcelera Inc.
    • 16.3.28. Quantum Corporation
    • 16.3.29. Quest Software Inc.
    • 16.3.30. SentinelOne, Inc.
    • 16.3.31. T-Systems International GmbH
    • 16.3.32. Veritas Storage (Ireland) Limited
    • 16.3.33. VMware, Inc.

17. ResearchAI

18. ResearchStatistics

19. ResearchContacts

20. ResearchArticles

21. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦