수확후 처리 시장 : 처리 유형별, 작물 유형별, 제형별, 시용별, 용도별, 최종사용자별, 유통 채널별 - 세계 예측(2025-2030년)

The Post Harvest Treatment Market was valued at USD 2.72 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.95 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.54%, reaching USD 4.45 billion by 2030.

The post harvest treatment landscape has emerged as a pivotal battleground for stakeholders striving to reduce food waste, enhance shelf life, and optimize value chain efficiency. In the wake of rising consumer demand for fresh, minimally processed foods, producers and handlers face intensified pressure to deploy innovative preservation strategies that safeguard quality and safety from farm gate to table. Moreover, regulatory bodies across major producing regions are mandating stricter residue limits and sustainability benchmarks, compelling market participants to balance efficacy with environmental and health considerations.

Against this backdrop, a diverse array of solutions has converged to address post harvest challenges. Biological treatments, chemical disinfestations, and physical interventions now coexist within an integrated framework that transcends traditional cold chain approaches. Advancements in microbial inoculants and enzyme-based formulations are unlocking new pathways for decay control, while targeted fungicidal and insecticidal treatments continue to play a critical role in mitigating pathogen and pest threats. Simultaneously, heat, UV and vacuum infusion techniques complement storage innovations, enabling dynamic moisture regulation and extending freshness horizons.

Transitioning from fragmented practices to comprehensive post harvest management represents both an opportunity and a necessity. As stakeholders seek to harmonize performance, compliance and sustainability goals, this report lays the foundation for understanding the drivers, innovations and emerging trends that will define the next era of post harvest treatment.

Rapid Technological Advancements and Sustainability Imperatives Are Redefining the Future of Post Harvest Treatment Solutions Across Key Cultures

The post harvest treatment ecosystem is undergoing a fundamental transformation driven by rapid technological advances and mounting sustainability imperatives. Cutting-edge research in biological solutions has yielded enzyme-driven delignification processes and next-generation microbial inoculants that proactively inhibit spoilage organisms. These developments are now complementing long-standing chemical protocols, where precision fungicidal and insecticidal agents are being reformulated to minimize environmental footprint while maintaining robust pathogen control.

Simultaneously, physical treatment methods have evolved beyond conventional refrigeration. Sophisticated cold storage systems featuring real-time temperature and humidity monitoring are being paired with pulsed UV irradiation and controlled heat treatments to create synergistic preservation effects. The integration of vacuum infusion technologies further enables uniform delivery of protective coatings and moisture-regulating compounds, ensuring consistent quality across diverse crop types.

Sustainability measures are catalyzing further change as stakeholders adopt carbon-neutral cold chains and bio-based formulation chemistries. Regulatory frameworks emphasizing reduced chemical residues and life cycle assessments are accelerating the shift toward circular-economy models, where post harvest by-products are repurposed into value-added inputs. As a result, companies that successfully embed ecological stewardship into their treatment portfolios stand to differentiate themselves in an increasingly values-driven marketplace.

Analysing the Complex Effects of New United States Tariffs on Post Harvest Treatment Supply Chains and Agricultural Trade Flows

In 2025, a new tranche of U.S. tariffs targeting agricultural inputs and preservation technologies has reshaped global trade dynamics and supply chain strategies. Producers sourcing treatment chemicals and cold storage equipment from traditional exporters now face increased duty burdens, prompting a reexamination of procurement channels and inventory management practices. These tariff adjustments have had a cascading effect on input costs, forcing many to explore localized manufacturing partnerships and alternative material formulations to mitigate financial exposure.

Trade compliance teams are navigating more complex documentation requirements, while distribution networks are adjusting lead times and transit routes to offset higher landed costs. At the same time, importers in adjacent markets have leveraged tariff differentials by establishing cross-border consolidation hubs and bonded warehouse arrangements to preserve margins. These strategic shifts have underscored the importance of agile logistics frameworks capable of adapting to evolving policy landscapes.

Amid these headwinds, collaboration between private sector actors and trade associations is intensifying. Joint advocacy efforts aim to secure tariff exclusions for essential post harvest inputs classified as critical to food security. In parallel, suppliers are accelerating R&D investments in tariff-exempt alternatives, such as bio-based coatings and domestically sourced cold chain components. The resulting diversification of treatment portfolios demonstrates the sector's resilience and reinforces the vital role of policy intelligence in long-term planning.

In-Depth Segmentation Reveals Treatment Types, Crops, Formulations, Application Modes, End Users and Distribution Channels Shaping Post Harvest Solutions

Segmentation analysis illuminates the multifaceted nature of post harvest treatment requirements, revealing that biological, chemical and physical approaches each bring distinct performance attributes and operational considerations. Biological treatment solutions range from targeted enzyme-based formulations designed to reinforce plant cell integrity, to microbial inoculants that outcompete spoilage organisms at ambient storage temperatures. Chemical interventions encompass both fungicidal compounds tailored to common post harvest pathogens and insecticidal treatments optimized for pest suppression, while physical methods include advanced cold storage infrastructures supported by heat treatment protocols and intermittent UV exposure techniques.

The diversity of crop types further shapes treatment selection, with cereals and grains necessitating desiccation-focused approaches, fruits demanding gentle temperature modulation and tailored coatings for berries, citrus, pome and tropical varieties, and vegetables benefiting from moisture control strategies specific to leafy greens and root crops. Formulation preferences span granular and powder formats for dry applications, alongside liquid emulsifications and suspensions that facilitate rapid dissolution and uniform application. Application modes vary from high-precision spraying and dipping to fumigation and vacuum infusion, each selected to address the unique surface and internal diffusion characteristics of different commodities.

Outcome-oriented segmentation clarifies that decay control formulations aim to inhibit microbial proliferation, whereas moisture control solutions preserve turgor and reduce textural degradation. Distribution pathways split between traditional offline retail environments and online channels, with producers, food processors, retail chains and logistics firms representing the primary end users. By understanding these interrelated segmentation dimensions, stakeholders can more effectively tailor their product development, marketing and supply chain strategies to meet evolving market needs.

Regional Analysis Highlights Unique Growth Drivers and Distribution Challenges in Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific Treatment Markets

The Americas are experiencing a surge in demand for integrated cold chain solutions, driven by expansive production in major fruit and vegetable corridors and tightening safety regulations in North and South America. Domestic players are investing heavily in regional manufacturing of treatment formulations to reduce reliance on imports, while cross-border harmonization efforts aim to streamline compliance protocols between key trading partners.

Within Europe, the Middle East and Africa, policy initiatives centered on residue reduction and carbon footprint minimization are encouraging widespread adoption of biological treatments. The European Union's Green Deal and corresponding farm-to-fork strategies have catalyzed a shift toward microbial inoculants and enzyme-driven preservation techniques. In the Middle East and Africa, the focus remains on scalable physical infrastructure, with cold storage and UV treatment facilities emerging as critical enablers of year-round supply continuity.

In Asia Pacific, dynamic population growth and expanding middle classes are fueling robust uptake of both high-efficacy chemical treatments and next-generation biofilm coatings. Rapid urbanization has spurred the development of state-of-the-art packing houses equipped with integrated fumigation, spraying and vacuum infusion systems. Simultaneously, regional cooperation agreements are enabling technology transfer programs, promoting local manufacturing of liquid emulsifications and powder formulations to satisfy diverse crop preservation requirements.

Leading Companies Are Accelerating Innovation, Strategic Partnerships and Portfolio Diversification to Dominate the Evolving Post Harvest Treatment Landscape

Leading players in the post harvest treatment arena are differentiating their offerings through strategic alliances, targeted acquisitions and robust R&D pipelines. Collaboration between chemical formulators and biotechnology firms has accelerated the launch of hybrid products that combine microbial efficacy with controlled-release mechanisms. Partnerships with cold chain logistics providers are delivering end-to-end solutions, integrating data-driven monitoring systems that optimize treatment scheduling and minimize spoilage risk.

Investment priorities among top companies have shifted toward expanding footprint in emerging markets while fortifying positions in established regions. Technology licensing agreements enable rapid scaling of novel physical treatment systems, such as modular heat treatment chambers and ultraviolet irradiation loops, without incurring heavy capital expenditures. Concurrently, bespoke formulation platforms are being developed in collaboration with agricultural research institutes to tailor solutions to locally prevalent pathogens and crop cultivars.

Executive leadership teams are also streamlining global supply networks by forging long-term contracts with raw material suppliers, ensuring consistency in ingredient quality and securing preferential access to bio-based input streams. Through these multifaceted initiatives, market leaders are solidifying their capability to deliver differentiated value propositions that align with evolving regulatory, sustainability and performance benchmarks.

Strategic Recommendations to Strengthen Supply Chain Resilience and Accelerate Sustainable Innovation in Post Harvest Treatment Operations

Industry leaders should prioritize the integration of biological treatment innovations into their core portfolios, leveraging enzyme-based and microbial inoculant technologies to meet rising consumer and regulatory demands for low-residue solutions. Cultivating long-standing collaborations with academic and research institutions can expedite the development of tailored preservation platforms that address region-specific spoilage challenges. Furthermore, establishing pilot facilities for advanced cold storage and UV treatment will allow real-time performance validation and foster customer confidence in emerging physical modalities.

To navigate evolving tariff structures, companies must adopt flexible procurement strategies that include dual sourcing and in-market production partnerships. Engaging with trade advisory groups to advocate for essential input exemptions can reduce cost volatility, while investing in tariff-exempt alternatives will future-proof supply chains. In parallel, deploying digital platforms for order management and traceability will enhance operational transparency and facilitate compliance with strict cross-border documentation requirements.

An emphasis on training programs for growers, packers and distributors will ensure proper application technique and maximize treatment efficacy. By developing comprehensive educational curricula, stakeholders can reduce misuse, limit residue incidents and reinforce best practices across the value chain. Collectively, these actionable steps will position organizations to capitalize on the next wave of growth opportunities in the post harvest treatment sector.

Comprehensive Research Methodology Explaining Primary Interviews and Secondary Data Triangulation Ensuring Robust Insights into Post Harvest Treatment Trends

This analysis is grounded in a mixed-method research design that combines primary engagement with industry stakeholders and systematic secondary data review. In-depth interviews with executive decision makers at producer cooperatives, formulation specialists and logistics providers provided qualitative insights into operational challenges and innovation trajectories. These perspectives were supplemented by data harvested from agricultural trade associations, government policy briefs and publicly available regulatory filings.

Secondary sources, including peer-reviewed journals and white papers on post harvest physiology, informed the evaluation of emerging biological and physical treatment technologies. The integration of proprietary patent databases allowed for the identification of novel enzyme and microbial delivery mechanisms, while equipment manufacturer catalogs provided specifications for next-generation cold storage and UV units. Triangulation across these diverse inputs ensured the robustness of findings and the elimination of potential bias.

The research process incorporated rigorous data validation protocols, cross-referencing stakeholder accounts with industry benchmarks and historical precedent. Geographic and segmental analyses were performed using a harmonized coding framework, facilitating comparability across treatment types, crop classes and regional corridors. As a result, the report offers authoritative intelligence that supports strategic planning and informed decision-making in the post harvest treatment domain.

Conclusive Synthesis of Key Findings Emphasizes Emerging Trends, Policy Impacts and Strategic Imperatives Shaping Post Harvest Treatment Approaches

The conclusive synthesis underscores that the post harvest treatment domain is at an inflection point shaped by technological innovation, regulatory evolution and shifting trade dynamics. Biological solutions are transitioning from niche applications to mainstream adoption, driven by enzyme-enhanced formulations and precise microbial inoculant delivery systems that align with sustainability mandates. Concurrently, advanced physical modalities such as heat processing, UV irradiation and vacuum infusion are redefining the parameters of freshness preservation.

Policy frameworks, particularly the latest U.S. tariff revisions and international residue regulations, have introduced complexity into sourcing and distribution strategies. However, they have also catalyzed inventive sourcing alternatives and local manufacturing initiatives that bolster supply chain resilience. Regional analyses reveal distinct growth trajectories, with the Americas emphasizing integrated cold chain efficiency, EMEA focusing on low-residue biological treatments, and Asia Pacific embracing scalable physical and chemical hybrid systems.

Looking forward, successful market participants will be those who harmonize innovation with adaptability, embedding policy intelligence into product roadmaps and forging cross-sector partnerships to deliver end-to-end preservation solutions. By aligning R&D investments with emerging compliance imperatives and sustainability benchmarks, stakeholders can unlock new value across the fresh produce supply chain and reinforce global food security objectives.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Define: Research Objective
• 2.2. Determine: Research Design
• 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
• 2.4. Collect: Data Source
• 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
• 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
• 2.7. Publish: Research Report
• 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

• 5.1. Rising consumer preference for minimally processed and pesticide-free post-harvest products
• 5.2. Implementation of automated sorting and grading technologies improving post-harvest efficiency
• 5.3. Use of controlled atmosphere storage techniques to minimize post-harvest losses
• 5.4. Development of smart packaging solutions to monitor and maintain post-harvest freshness
• 5.5. Growth in the use of natural antimicrobial coatings to prevent post-harvest spoilage
• 5.6. Integration of nanotechnology in post-harvest treatments to extend shelf life
• 5.7. Technological advancements in cold chain logistics enhancing post-harvest quality retention
• 5.8. Integration of IoT and smart monitoring in post-harvest infrastructure
• 5.9. Shift toward biological and organic post-harvest treatments
• 5.10. Adoption of hyperspectral imaging for early spoilage detection

6. Market Insights

• 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Post Harvest Treatment Market, by Treatment Type

• 8.1. Introduction
• 8.2. Biological Treatment
  • 8.2.1. Enzyme-Based Solutions
  • 8.2.2. Microbial Inoculants
• 8.3. Chemical Treatment
  • 8.3.1. Fungicidal Treatment
  • 8.3.2. Insecticidal Treatment
• 8.4. Physical Treatment
  • 8.4.1. Cold Storage
  • 8.4.2. Heat Treatment
  • 8.4.3. UV Treatment

9. Post Harvest Treatment Market, by Crop Type

• 9.1. Introduction
• 9.2. Cereals & Grains
• 9.3. Fruits
  • 9.3.1. Berries
  • 9.3.2. Citrus
  • 9.3.3. Pome
  • 9.3.4. Tropical
• 9.4. Oilseeds & Pulses
• 9.5. Vegetables
  • 9.5.1. Leafy Greens
  • 9.5.2. Root Vegetables

10. Post Harvest Treatment Market, by Formulation

• 10.1. Introduction
• 10.2. Granular Formulations
• 10.3. Liquid Formulations
  • 10.3.1. Emulsifications
  • 10.3.2. Suspensions
• 10.4. Powder Formulations

11. Post Harvest Treatment Market, by Application Mode

• 11.1. Introduction
• 11.2. Coating
• 11.3. Dipping
• 11.4. Fumigation
• 11.5. Spraying
• 11.6. Vacuum Infusion

12. Post Harvest Treatment Market, by Application

• 12.1. Introduction
• 12.2. Decay Control
• 12.3. Moisture Control

13. Post Harvest Treatment Market, by End User

• 13.1. Introduction
• 13.2. Agricultural Producers
• 13.3. Food Processing Companies
• 13.4. Retail & Supermarkets
• 13.5. Storage & Logistics Firms

14. Post Harvest Treatment Market, by Distribution Channel

• 14.1. Introduction
• 14.2. Offline Retail
• 14.3. Online Retail
  • 14.3.1. Brand Websites
  • 14.3.2. E-commerce Platforms

15. Americas Post Harvest Treatment Market

• 15.1. Introduction
• 15.2. United States
• 15.3. Canada
• 15.4. Mexico
• 15.5. Brazil
• 15.6. Argentina

16. Europe, Middle East & Africa Post Harvest Treatment Market

• 16.1. Introduction
• 16.2. United Kingdom
• 16.3. Germany
• 16.4. France
• 16.5. Russia
• 16.6. Italy
• 16.7. Spain
• 16.8. United Arab Emirates
• 16.9. Saudi Arabia
• 16.10. South Africa
• 16.11. Denmark
• 16.12. Netherlands
• 16.13. Qatar
• 16.14. Finland
• 16.15. Sweden
• 16.16. Nigeria
• 16.17. Egypt
• 16.18. Turkey
• 16.19. Israel
• 16.20. Norway
• 16.21. Poland
• 16.22. Switzerland

17. Asia-Pacific Post Harvest Treatment Market

• 17.1. Introduction
• 17.2. China
• 17.3. India
• 17.4. Japan
• 17.5. Australia
• 17.6. South Korea
• 17.7. Indonesia
• 17.8. Thailand
• 17.9. Philippines
• 17.10. Malaysia
• 17.11. Singapore
• 17.12. Vietnam
• 17.13. Taiwan

18. Competitive Landscape

• 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 18.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 18.3.1. Absoger SAS
  • 18.3.2. AgroFresh Solutions, Inc.
  • 18.3.3. BASF SE
  • 18.3.4. Bayer AG
  • 18.3.5. Belchim Crop Protection by Mitsui & Co. Ltd.
  • 18.3.6. CITROSOL PRODUCTS SA
  • 18.3.7. Colin Campbell Chemicals Pty Ltd.
  • 18.3.8. Corteva Agriscience LLC.
  • 18.3.9. FMC Corporation
  • 18.3.10. Futureco Bioscience S.A. by Sumitomo Corporation
  • 18.3.11. Janssen PMP by Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
  • 18.3.12. JBT Corporation
  • 18.3.13. Nufarm Ltd.
  • 18.3.14. Pioneer Agrobiz Co., Ltd.
  • 18.3.15. Sensitech by Carrier Global Corporation
  • 18.3.16. Syngenta AG
  • 18.3.17. UPL Ltd.
  • 18.3.18. Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC
  • 18.3.19. ROAM TECHNOLOGY NV by WVT Industries NV
  • 18.3.20. Indogulf BioAg LLC by Indogulf Group
  • 18.3.21. Israel Chemicals Ltd.
  • 18.3.22. PostHarvest Technologies
  • 18.3.23. Hazel Technologies Inc.
  • 18.3.24. Lytone Enterprise Inc.
  • 18.3.25. Kitozyme, LLC
  • 18.3.26. SUFRESCA LTD.
  • 18.3.27. Ceradis B.V.
  • 18.3.28. AgriCoat NatureSeal Ltd by RPM International Inc.
  • 18.3.29. Tagros Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd. by The Jhaver Group

19. ResearchAI

20. ResearchStatistics

21. ResearchContacts

22. ResearchArticles

23. Appendix