½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1806651

ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå : ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ®º°, Æò°¡ À¯Çüº°, ÀÎÁö ±â´Éº°, ±â¼úº°, ¿¬·ÉÃþº°, Àü°³ ¸ðµåº°, ¿ëµµº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market by Component, Assessment Type, Cognitive Function Measured, Technology, Age Group, Deployment Mode, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 192 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 31¾ï 1,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. 2025³â¿¡´Â 33¾ï 6,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸£°í, CAGR 8.14%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 49¾ï 8,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ : 2024³â 31¾ï 1,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ : 2025³â 33¾ï 6,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ : 2030³â 49¾ï 8,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 8.14%

Á¤¹ÐÀÇ·á¿Í °¡Ä¡ ±â¹Ý ÀÇ·á·Î Á¤ÀǵǴ ½Ã´ë¿¡ ÀÇ·á Á¦°ø¾÷ü, ÁöºÒÀÚ, ±â¼ú °³¹ßÀÚµé »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ ÀÎÁö°Ç°­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ÈÆ·Ã ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº ÇöÀç ½Å°æ Àå¾ÖÀÇ Á¶±â ¹ß°ß, °³º°È­µÈ ÀçȰ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥, ÀÎÁö ±â´É ÀúÇϸ¦ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Àα¸ÀÇ °í·ÉÈ­¿Í ¸¸¼ºÁúȯÀÇ È®»êÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ½Å·Ú¼º°ú È®À强, ÀûÀÀ¼ºÀ» °®Ãá ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ µµ±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä´Â ±× ¾î´À ¶§º¸´Ù ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

µðÁöÅÐ °Ç°­ÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀº ±âÁ¸ °Ë»ç ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ±â´ÉÀ» È®ÀåÇÏ°í »ýü ¼¾¼­, ¸ôÀÔÇü ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º, ¾Ë°í¸®Áò ±â¹Ý ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© Á¤È®¼º°ú ȯÀÚ Âü¿©µµ¸¦ Çâ»ó½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ´ÙÇÐÁ¦Àû ¿¬±¸¿Í ÀÓ»ó ½Ç½ÀÀÇ À¶ÇÕÀº ¿¹¹æ Á¶Ä¡¿Í Àå±â ÃßÀû¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÐ ÀÎÁö ÁßÀç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸´Ù Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ Á¢±ÙÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ÀÇ·á°è Àü¹ÝÀÇ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº ±âÁ¸ ¿öÅ©Ç÷ο츦 ÀçÆò°¡Çϰí, ±â´É °£ ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê¿¡ ÅõÀÚÇϸç, ÀÇ·á ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°øÀÇ °ÝÂ÷¸¦ ÇØ¼ÒÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» ¸ð»öÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

º» º¸°í¼­ÀÇ ¼­·Ð¿¡¼­´Â ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ, ±ÔÁ¦ °³Ã´, ±â¼úÀÇ ºñ¾àÀûÀÎ ¹ßÀüÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ÈÆ·ÃÀÇ ÀçÁ¤ÀÇ·Î ¼ö·ÅµÇ´ÂÁö ÀÌÇØÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Àü·«Àû ¹è°æÀ» ¼³Á¤Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¼½¼Ç¿¡¼­´Â ÁÖ¿ä ÃËÁø¿äÀΰú °úÁ¦¸¦ Á¤¸®ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á, Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ º¯È­, ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅëÂû·Â, ÅõÀÚ °áÁ¤ ¹× ºñÁî´Ï½º Àü·«¿¡ µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ´Â ½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ ±ÇÀå »çÇ×À» Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î °ËÅäÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Åä´ë¸¦ ¸¶·ÃÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

±â¼ú, ä¿ë ¹× ÀÓ»ó ½Ç½À Àü¹Ý¿¡ °ÉÄ£ ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ±³À° »ýŰ踦 Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ º¯È­ÀÇ °ËÁõ

ÃÖ±Ù ÀΰøÁö´É, ¸Ó½Å·¯´×, ¸ôÀÔÇü ±â¼úÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ Çõ½ÅÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ÈÆ·ÃÀÇ »óȲÀº ±Þ°ÝÇÑ º¯È­¸¦ °Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹ßÀüÀº Áø´Ü Å×½ºÆ®ÀÇ Á¤È®¼º°ú ½Å·Ú¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½Ãų »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, °³ÀÎÀÇ ¼º°ú¿Í ÁøÇà »óȲ¿¡ µû¶ó µ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î ¹ÝÀÀÇÏ´Â ÀûÀÀÇü ÈÆ·Ã ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀ¸·Î ÀÓ»ó ÇöÀå°ú ¿¬±¸±â°üÀ» ³Ñ¾î ½Ç½Ã°£ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ °øÀ¯°¡ ¿ëÀÌÇØÁ® °ËÁõ°ú äÅÃÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Çù·ÂÀû ³×Æ®¿öÅ©°¡ Á¶¼ºµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

2025³â ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ Á¤Ã¥ÀÌ ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ±â¼ú °ø±Þ¸Á ¿ªÇÐ ¹× Çõ½Å ±ËÀû¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â º¹ÇÕÀû ¿µÇâ ±Ô¸í

2025³â°ü¼¼ Á¶Á¤ÀÇ µµÀÔÀº ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ Çϵå¿þ¾î ¹× ÁÖº¯ ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ ¼¼°è °ø±Þ¸Á¿¡ º¹ÀâÇÑ °èÃþÀ» µµÀÔÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ±¹Á¦ °ø±Þ¾÷ü·ÎºÎÅÍ Á¶´ÞµÇ´Â ºÎǰÀº ÇöÀç »ý»ê ºñ¿ëÀ» Áõ°¡½ÃŰ°í °¡°Ý Àü·«¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í Á¶´Þ ÀÇ»ç °áÁ¤¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ °ü¼¼¿¡ Á÷¸éÇØ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ư¼ö ¼¾¼­, °íÇØ»óµµ µð½ºÇ÷¹ÀÌ, °íÀ¯ÇÑ ¿þ¾î·¯ºí ±â±â¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ´Â Á¶Á÷Àº ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­¿¡ ƯÈ÷ ¹Î°¨ÇÏ°Ô ¹ÝÀÀÇÏ¿© Á¶´Þ ¿É¼Ç°ú Àç°í °ü¸® Á¤Ã¥À» ÀçÆò°¡ÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå ¿ªÇп¡¼­ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò, Æò°¡ À¯Çü, ÀÎÁö ±â´É, ±â¼ú, ¿¬·É´ë, ¹èÆ÷ ¸ðµå, ¿ëµµ, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚº°·Î ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇп¡¼­ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¹àÈü´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ ÀÌÇØ´Â ¼ºÀå Æ÷ÄÏÀ» ½Äº°Çϰí Àü·«À» È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î Á¶Á¤ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ´Â ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀڵ鿡°Ô ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±¸¼º ¿ä¼ÒÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ º¸¸é Çϵå¿þ¾î ¼Ö·ç¼Ç, ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î Ç÷§Æû, Àü·«Àû ÄÁ¼³ÆÃºÎÅÍ ½Ç½À ±³À°, ¿î¿µ Áö¿ø±îÁö ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼­ºñ½º°¡ Æ÷ÇԵ˴ϴÙ. °¢ Ä«Å×°í¸®´Â °¢±â ´Ù¸¥ Àü¹® Áö½Ä, ÅõÀÚ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ, ½ÃÀå °³Ã´ Àü·«ÀÌ ¿ä±¸µË´Ï´Ù.

¹ÌÁÖ, À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ ºÐ¼®, °íÀ¯ÇÑ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ ¹× ¼ºÀå ÆÐÅÏ ÆÄ¾Ç

±ÔÁ¦ ȯ°æ, ÀÎÇÁ¶ó ¼º¼÷µµ, ÀÇ·á ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§ÀÇ Áö¿ªÀû Â÷ÀÌ´Â ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ÈÆ·Ã ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ °³¹ß ¹× µµÀÔ¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌĨ´Ï´Ù. ¹Ì±¹ ´ë·ú¿¡¼­´Â µðÁöÅÐ Çコ ÀÌ´Ï¼ÅÆ¼ºê¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °­·ÂÇÑ ÅõÀÚ¿Í È®¸³µÈ »óȯ »ýŰ谡 ÁÖ·ù Áø·á °æ·Î¿¡ °í±Þ Áø´ÜÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ºÏ¹ÌÀÇ ÀÇ·á ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¾÷üµéÀº AI¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀ» ÀÚÁÖ ½ÃÇèÀûÀ¸·Î µµÀÔÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Áß³²¹Ì ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­´Â ¿ø°Ý ÀÇ·á Ç÷§ÆûÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÇ·á¼­ºñ½º°¡ ºÎÁ·ÇÑ Áö¿ª¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¢±Ù¼ºÀ» È®´ëÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ±³À° ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ Çõ½Å Àü·«°ú ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» Çü¼ºÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ¾÷°è ¼±µµÀû ±â¾÷ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϸµ

ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ±³À° ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷µéÀº Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ, ¼öÁ÷Àû ÅëÇÕ, ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀ» ÅëÇØ °æÀï ±¸µµ¸¦ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À¸¦ º¸À¯ÇÑ ¾÷°è º£Å×¶û ±â¾÷µéÀº Àü¹® AI ¹× ¸Ó½Å·¯´× ½ºÅ¸Æ®¾÷À» ÀμöÇÏ¿© ÇÙ½É Áø´Ü ¿ª·®À» °­È­Çϰí, ¿¹Ãø ºÐ¼® ¹× °³ÀÎÈ­ ±â´ÉÀ» °­È­ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÁÖ·ÂÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ½Å±â¼ú ±â¾÷µéÀº »õ·Î¿î µðÁöÅÐ Ä¡·áÁ¦¸¦ °ËÁõÇϰí Áõ°Å ±â¹ÝÀ» È®´ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ Çмú ¿¬±¸ ±â°ü ¹× ÀÓ»ó ¿¬±¸ ±â°ü°ú ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» ¸Î°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÇ·á ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ¿¡°Ô ÈûÀ» ½Ç¾îÁÖ´Â Àü·«Àû Á¦¾È¼­ ÀÛ¼º, Çõ½ÅÀÇ Ã¤Åà ÃËÁø, ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ±¸Çö ÃÖÀûÈ­

ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ÈÆ·ÃÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ±âȸ¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¾÷°è ¸®´õµéÀº ´Ù°¢µµÀÇ Àü·«Àû Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» äÅÃÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸ÕÀú, ÀÓ»óÀÇ, µ¥ÀÌÅÍ »çÀ̾ð½ºÀÚ, ±â¼ú ¼³°èÀÚ µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ Çù¾÷À» ÃËÁøÇÏ¿© ¿øÈ°ÇÑ È¯ÀÚ °æÇèÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÅëÇÕ Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ °³¹ßÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚÀÇ Àμ¾Æ¼ºê¸¦ ÀÏÄ¡½Ã۰í, ÁöÀû Àç»êÀ» °øÀ¯ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á °³¹ß ±â°£À» ´ÜÃàÇÏ°í ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ »óÈ£ ¿î¿ë¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ±³À° µ¿Çâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇØ Àü¹®°¡ ÀÎÅͺä¿Í Á¤·®Àû ºÐ¼®À» äÅÃÇÑ Á¶»ç ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

º» Á¶»ç´Â Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÌ°í ½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» È®º¸Çϱâ À§ÇØ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ È¥ÇÕ ¿¬±¸ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ äÅÃÇÏ¿© Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÌ°í ½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» È®º¸Çß½À´Ï´Ù. ÁúÀû µ¥ÀÌÅÍ´Â ¼ÒÆ® ¸®´õ, ÀÓ»ó ½Ç¹«ÀÚ ¹× ±â¼ú Çõ½Å°¡¿ÍÀÇ ½ÉÃþ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÅëÇØ ¼öÁýµÇ¾î »õ·Î¿î Æ®·»µå, ¹ÌÃæÁ· ¼ö¿ä ¹× äÅà À庮¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ °üÁ¡À» Á¦°øÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÅëÂû·ÂÀº ÀÓ»ó, Çмú, ±â¾÷, Á¤ºÎ ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ÈÄ¼Ó Á¤·®Àû Á¶»ç¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ±¸Á¶È­µÈ ¼³¹®Áö ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁý ¼ö´ÜÀ» °³¹ßÇÏ´Â µ¥ ¹Ý¿µµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ±³À° Ȱµ¿ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¿äÁ¡ ¿ä¾à ¹× ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀڵ鿡 ´ëÇÑ Àü·«Àû °úÁ¦ °­È­

ÀÌ °æ¿µÁø ¿ä¾àÀº ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× ±³À° ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ÁøÈ­, ±â¼ú Çõ½Å, ±ÔÁ¦ ¹ßÀü ¹× ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀÇ ¼ö·ÅÀ» °­Á¶Çß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº ÀÌÁ¦ AI ±â¹Ý ºÐ¼®, ¸ôÀÔÇü ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼Ç, ¸ðµâÈ­µÈ ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö º¸´Ù dzºÎÇÑ ÅøÅ¶¿¡ Á¢±ÙÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î º¸´Ù °³ÀÎÈ­µÇ°í, È¿À²ÀûÀ̸ç, È®Àå °¡´ÉÇÑ °³ÀÔÀÌ °¡´ÉÇØÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. Çϵå¿þ¾î °ü¼¼, Áö¿ª Á¤Ã¥ÀÇ º¯È­, Àü·«Àû ¼¼ºÐÈ­ÀÇ »óÈ£ ÀÛ¿ëÀº ¹ÎøÇÑ Á¢±Ù°ú ÀûÀÀ Àü·«ÀÇ Á߿伺À» °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå : ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ®º°

  • Çϵå¿þ¾î
  • ¼­ºñ½º
    • ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ
    • Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ¹× Áö¿ø
  • ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î

Á¦9Àå ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå : Æò°¡ À¯Çüº°

  • »ýüÀÎ½Ä Æò°¡
  • È£½ºÆ¼µå Æò°¡
  • Ææ°ú Á¾ÀÌ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Æò°¡

Á¦10Àå ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå : ÀÎÁö ±â´Éº°

  • ÁÖÀÇ ¹× ÁýÁß
  • ½ÃÇà ±â´É
  • ¾ð¾î ¹× À¯Ã¢ÇÔ
  • ±â¾ï·Â
  • ó¸® ¼Óµµ
  • Ãß·Ð ¹× ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤
  • ½Ã°ø°£ ´É·Â

Á¦11Àå ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå : ±â¼úº°

  • ÀΰøÁö´É(AI)
  • ¸Ó½Å·¯´×(ML)
  • °¡»óÇö½Ç(VR) ¹× Áõ°­Çö½Ç(AR)

Á¦12Àå ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå : ¿¬·ÉÃþº°

  • ¼ºÀÎ
  • °í·ÉÀÚ
  • ¼Ò¾Æ

Á¦13Àå ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå : Àü°³ ¸ðµåº°

  • Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý
  • On-Premise

Á¦14Àå ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

  • Çо÷ Æò°¡
  • ÀÓ»ó Áø´Ü
  • ÀÎÁö Æ®·¹ÀÌ´×
  • ¿¬±¸ ¹× ÀÓ»ó½ÃÇè

Á¦15Àå ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • Çмú±â°ü
  • ±â¾÷ ºÎ¹®
  • Á¤ºÎ ¹× ¹æÀ§ ºÎ¹®
  • ÀÇ·á Á¦°ø¾÷ü
    • Ŭ¸®´Ð
    • º´¿ø
    • ÀçȰġ·á¼¾ÅÍ
  • ¿¬±¸±â°ü

Á¦16Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦17Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦18Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ß ÀÎÁö Æò°¡ ¹× Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦19Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • Altoida, Inc.
    • BrainCheck, Inc.
    • Cambridge Cognition Ltd.
    • Clario
    • CNS Vital Signs, LLC
    • CogniFit Ltd.
    • Cogstate Ltd.
    • Dividat, Inc.
    • Elevate Labs, LLC
    • Impact Applications Inc. by Riverside Assessments, LLC
    • Koninklijke Philips N.V.
    • Linus Health, Inc.
    • Lumos Labs, Inc.
    • Pearson Education, Inc.
    • Posit Science Corporation
    • Re : Cognition Health Limited
    • Signant Health
    • VoxNeuro Inc.
    • Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
    • Brain Resource, Inc.
    • HASOMED GmbH

Á¦20Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦21Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦22Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃÆ®

Á¦23Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦24Àå ºÎ·Ï

LSH 25.09.17

The Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market was valued at USD 3.11 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 3.36 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.14%, reaching USD 4.98 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 3.11 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 3.36 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 4.98 billion
CAGR (%) 8.14%

In an era defined by precision medicine and value-based care, the focus on cognitive health has intensified among healthcare providers, payers, and technology developers. Cognitive assessment and training solutions now play a pivotal role in early detection of neurological disorders, personalized rehabilitation programs, and ongoing monitoring of cognitive decline. As populations age and chronic conditions become more prevalent, the demand for reliable, scalable, and adaptive cognitive evaluation tools has never been greater.

Advancements in digital health have expanded the capabilities of traditional testing methods, integrating biometric sensors, immersive interfaces, and algorithm-driven analytics to enhance accuracy and patient engagement. Meanwhile, the convergence of interdisciplinary research and clinical practice is fostering a more holistic approach to cognitive interventions, emphasizing preventive measures and longitudinal tracking. Consequently, stakeholders across the healthcare continuum are reevaluating existing workflows, investing in cross-functional partnerships, and seeking innovative solutions to address gaps in care delivery.

This report's introduction establishes the strategic context for understanding how market dynamics, regulatory developments, and technological breakthroughs converge to redefine cognitive assessment and training. By framing the key drivers and challenges, this section sets the stage for a comprehensive exploration of transformative shifts, segmentation insights, and actionable recommendations that can inform investment decisions and operational strategies.

Examining Pivotal Transformations Shaping the Cognitive Assessment and Training Ecosystem Across Technology, Adoption and Clinical Practice

The cognitive assessment and training landscape has undergone dramatic transformations in recent years, driven by rapid innovation in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and immersive technologies. These advances are not only enhancing the precision and reliability of diagnostic tests but also enabling adaptive training programs that respond dynamically to an individual's performance and progress. Moreover, the integration of cloud-based platforms has facilitated real-time data sharing across clinical sites and research institutions, fostering collaborative networks that accelerate validation and adoption.

In parallel, regulatory frameworks have evolved to accommodate digital therapeutics and software as a medical device, lowering barriers to market entry while establishing rigorous safety and efficacy standards. This shift has encouraged startups and established healthcare companies alike to expand their portfolios and invest in evidence-based digital interventions. Furthermore, the growing emphasis on patient engagement tools and mobile health applications is reshaping user expectations, prompting solution providers to prioritize intuitive design, accessibility, and seamless integration with electronic health records.

Taken together, these developments signify a departure from one-size-fits-all approaches toward more personalized, data-driven modalities. Consequently, stakeholders must navigate a complex web of clinical requirements, reimbursement pathways, and technological partnerships to capitalize on new opportunities. This section examines the most pivotal transformations that are redefining the ecosystem and laying the groundwork for sustained growth and enhanced patient outcomes.

Unraveling the Compound Effects of 2025 US Tariff Policies on the Supply Chain Dynamics and Innovation Trajectory in Cognitive Assessment Technologies

The introduction of tariff adjustments in 2025 has introduced a layer of complexity to global supply chains for cognitive assessment hardware and peripherals. Components sourced from international suppliers now face varying duties that can increase production costs, impact pricing strategies, and influence procurement decisions. Organizations that rely on specialized sensors, high-resolution displays, or proprietary wearable devices are particularly susceptible to these changes, prompting a reevaluation of sourcing options and inventory management policies.

Beyond hardware, the tariff landscape also affects software development and maintenance when cloud-based services are hosted on international infrastructure. Service providers are compelled to assess the cost-benefit tradeoffs of relocating data centers, renegotiating vendor contracts, or absorbing additional duties to maintain competitive pricing. These strategic responses can lead to shifts in regional deployment preferences and the emergence of new partnerships aimed at mitigating financial exposure.

Despite these challenges, the tariff adjustments have spurred some providers to innovate through modular design, local manufacturing partnerships, and open-source software architectures that reduce dependency on tariff-impacted imports. By embracing flexible supply models and diversifying vendor networks, forward-thinking companies are converting potential cost pressures into opportunities for operational resilience and market differentiation. This section unpacks the cumulative effects of the 2025 US tariffs, outlining both the risks and adaptive strategies that will shape the competitive landscape.

Revealing How Component Offerings Assessment Types Technology Platforms Age Groups Deployment Modes and End Users Play a Pivotal Role in Market Dynamics

A nuanced understanding of market segmentation is essential for stakeholders aiming to identify growth pockets and tailor strategies effectively. From a component perspective, the landscape encompasses hardware solutions, software platforms, and a spectrum of services that extend from strategic consulting to hands-on training and operational support. Each of these categories demands distinct expertise, investment profiles, and go-to-market tactics.

When considering assessment types, methodologies range from advanced biometric evaluations and hosted digital protocols to traditional pen-and-paper instruments. These modalities cater to diverse clinical settings and user preferences, influencing adoption rates and customer engagement. Equally important is the segmentation by cognitive function measured, which spans attention and focus, executive function, language and verbal fluency, memory performance, processing speed, reasoning and decision making, as well as visuospatial skills. This dimension dictates the design of assessment batteries and the specialization of training programs.

Technological segmentation further differentiates offerings into artificial intelligence-driven systems, machine learning-enabled analytics, and immersive virtual or augmented reality environments. Age group considerations distinguish adult, geriatric, and pediatric cohorts, each with unique clinical imperatives and usability requirements. Deployment mode preferences oscillate between cloud-based platforms and on-premise installations, reflecting varying security, scalability, and integration needs. Finally, application domains cover academic assessments, clinical diagnostics, cognitive enhancement protocols, and research or clinical trial contexts, while end users range from academic institutions, corporate wellness initiatives, and government or defense sectors to healthcare providers operating clinics, hospitals, and rehabilitation centers, as well as specialized research organizations.

Analyzing Regional Market Dynamics Across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia-Pacific to Uncover Unique Drivers and Growth Patterns

Regional variations in regulatory environments, infrastructure maturity, and healthcare priorities have a profound impact on the development and adoption of cognitive assessment and training solutions. In the Americas, robust investments in digital health initiatives and a well-established reimbursement ecosystem have fueled integration of advanced diagnostics into mainstream care pathways. North American providers frequently pilot new AI-driven protocols, while Latin American markets are leveraging telehealth platforms to expand access in underserved regions.

Across Europe, Middle East, and Africa, regulatory harmonization efforts are gradually aligning disparate national frameworks, enabling cross-border clinical trials and collaborative research networks. Opportunities for localized manufacturing in EMEA are emerging, as governments prioritize healthcare sovereignty and encourage public-private partnerships. The diversity of healthcare systems in this region translates into differentiated uptake rates, with some markets emphasizing neurodegenerative disease screening and others focusing on workplace cognitive wellness programs.

Asia-Pacific markets present a unique blend of high-tech urban centers and rapidly growing healthcare infrastructures. Early adopters in metropolitan areas are deploying next-generation cognitive training applications on mobile devices, while rural regions rely on hybrid models that blend community health workers with teleassessment tools. Government initiatives aimed at addressing aging populations and mental health awareness are driving significant demand across China, India, Australia, and Southeast Asia. These regional insights highlight the importance of tailoring deployment and engagement strategies to local contexts and stakeholder expectations.

Profiling Leading Industry Players Shaping Innovation Strategies and Partnerships in the Cognitive Assessment and Training Marketplace

Leading companies in the cognitive assessment and training domain are continuously redefining the competitive landscape through strategic collaborations, vertical integration, and technological innovation. Industry veterans with extensive portfolios are augmenting core diagnostic capabilities by acquiring specialized AI and machine learning startups, thereby enhancing predictive analytics and personalization features. Meanwhile, emerging technology firms are forging alliances with academic and clinical research institutions to validate novel digital therapeutics and expand their evidence base.

A subset of market participants specializes in immersive solutions, developing augmented and virtual reality experiences that improve patient engagement and accelerate recovery milestones. These offerings often integrate with centralized analytics dashboards, enabling clinicians and researchers to monitor progress remotely and adjust intervention protocols in real time. Service providers focusing on consulting and support packages differentiate themselves by offering customized workflows, certification programs, and regulatory guidance to streamline implementation.

Strategic alliances between healthcare providers, technology vendors, and payers are becoming more prevalent, as each stakeholder seeks to share risk, align incentives, and co-develop new care models. Additionally, partnerships with government agencies and nonprofit organizations are driving large-scale screening initiatives and public health campaigns, further elevating awareness and bolstering adoption. This section profiles the key industry players, their strategic positioning, and the collaborative networks that underpin long-term growth prospects.

Crafting Strategic Recommendations to Empower Healthcare Stakeholders Drive Innovation Adoption and Optimize Implementation of Cognitive Assessment Solutions

To capitalize on emerging opportunities in cognitive assessment and training, industry leaders must adopt a multi-pronged strategic approach. First, fostering cross-disciplinary collaborations that unite clinicians, data scientists, and technology architects will accelerate the development of integrated platforms capable of delivering seamless patient experiences. By aligning incentives and sharing intellectual property, stakeholders can reduce development timelines and enhance solution interoperability.

Second, establishing comprehensive validation frameworks that encompass randomized clinical trials, real-world evidence studies, and usability assessments will strengthen the credibility of digital interventions. This rigorous evidence base will facilitate regulatory approvals, payer coverage decisions, and clinician endorsements, ultimately driving broader market penetration. In addition, implementing tiered deployment strategies that leverage both cloud and on-premise architectures will enable organizations to meet diverse security and connectivity requirements across various care settings.

Finally, investing in scalable training modules, certification programs, and user support services will promote adoption and maximize return on investment. By developing training curriculums tailored to different end user profiles-from academic researchers to frontline healthcare providers-companies can cultivate brand loyalty, minimize implementation friction, and generate recurring revenue streams. These actionable recommendations provide a roadmap for stakeholders seeking to navigate the evolving cognitive health ecosystem.

Outlining a Research Framework Employing Expert Interviews and Quantitative Analysis to Deliver Critical Insights on Cognitive Assessment and Training Trends

This study employs a rigorous mixed-methods research framework to ensure comprehensive and actionable insights. Qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews with thought leaders, clinical practitioners, and technology innovators, providing firsthand perspectives on emerging trends, unmet needs, and adoption barriers. These insights informed the development of structured questionnaires and data collection instruments used in subsequent quantitative surveys, which targeted a broad range of end users across clinical, academic, corporate, and government sectors.

Secondary research complemented primary efforts by analyzing peer-reviewed publications, industry white papers, regulatory filings, and publicly available financial disclosures. This desk-based investigation was crucial for mapping strategic partnerships, identifying M&A activity, and understanding regional policy frameworks that impact market dynamics. Data triangulation techniques were applied to cross-validate findings and minimize bias, ensuring that conclusions reflect both current realities and anticipated shifts.

The research process also incorporated scenario analysis and sensitivity testing to evaluate the potential impacts of external factors such as tariff adjustments, regulatory changes, and technological breakthroughs. Throughout this methodology, confidentiality protocols and data integrity standards were upheld to protect proprietary information and maintain the highest ethical standards.

Summarizing Key Takeaways and Reinforcing the Strategic Imperatives for Stakeholders in Cognitive Assessment and Training Initiatives

This executive summary has charted the evolution of cognitive assessment and training solutions, highlighting the convergence of technological innovation, regulatory progress, and market dynamics. Stakeholders now have access to a richer toolkit-from AI-driven analytics and immersive simulations to modular service offerings-that enables more personalized, efficient, and scalable interventions. The interplay between hardware tariffs, regional policy variations, and strategic segmentation underscores the importance of agile approaches and adaptive strategies.

Key takeaways include the necessity of building robust evidence through clinical validation, the value of forging interdisciplinary partnerships, and the imperative of aligning deployment architectures with end user requirements. Moreover, regional insights reveal a nuanced tapestry of growth opportunities, where targeted investment and localized engagement can unlock significant value. Companies that proactively address these dimensions are poised to lead the market, drive patient-centric outcomes, and generate sustainable revenue streams.

By internalizing these strategic imperatives and leveraging the comprehensive analysis presented, decision-makers can navigate uncertainty, capitalize on emerging trends, and fortify their competitive positioning. The path forward hinges on a balanced fusion of innovation, collaboration, and evidence-based implementation.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Integration of virtual reality cognitive training programs into post-stroke rehabilitation pathways
  • 5.2. Deployment of AI-driven digital biomarkers for early detection of neurodegenerative disorders in clinical settings
  • 5.3. Adoption of cloud-based cognitive assessment platforms for remote patient monitoring and telemedicine
  • 5.4. Expansion of personalized cognitive training solutions leveraging wearable EEG devices for data-driven insights
  • 5.5. Incorporation of gamification elements into mobile cognitive assessment tools to improve patient adherence
  • 5.6. Growth of multi-modal cognitive assessment combining speech analysis and eye-tracking in eldercare settings
  • 5.7. Collaboration between healthcare providers and neuroscience startups to co-develop adaptive cognitive therapies

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Hardware
  • 8.3. Services
    • 8.3.1. Consulting
    • 8.3.2. Training & Support
  • 8.4. Software

9. Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market, by Assessment Type

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Biometric Assessments
  • 9.3. Hosted Assessments
  • 9.4. Pen-and-Paper Based Assessments

10. Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market, by Cognitive Function Measured

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Attention & Focus
  • 10.3. Executive Function
  • 10.4. Language & Verbal Fluency
  • 10.5. Memory
  • 10.6. Processing Speed
  • 10.7. Reasoning & Decision Making
  • 10.8. Visuospatial Skills

11. Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market, by Technology

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  • 11.3. Machine Learning (ML)
  • 11.4. Virtual Reality (VR) & Augmented reality (AR)

12. Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market, by Age Group

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Adult
  • 12.3. Geriatric
  • 12.4. Pediatric

13. Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market, by Deployment Mode

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Cloud-Based
  • 13.3. On-Premise

14. Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market, by Application

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. Academic Assessment
  • 14.3. Clinical Diagnostics
  • 14.4. Cognitive Training
  • 14.5. Research & Clinical Trials

15. Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market, by End User

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. Academic Institutions
  • 15.3. Corporate Sector
  • 15.4. Government & Defense Sectors
  • 15.5. Healthcare Providers
    • 15.5.1. Clinics
    • 15.5.2. Hospitals
    • 15.5.3. Rehabilitation Centers
  • 15.6. Research Organizations

16. Americas Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market

  • 16.1. Introduction
  • 16.2. United States
  • 16.3. Canada
  • 16.4. Mexico
  • 16.5. Brazil
  • 16.6. Argentina

17. Europe, Middle East & Africa Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market

  • 17.1. Introduction
  • 17.2. United Kingdom
  • 17.3. Germany
  • 17.4. France
  • 17.5. Russia
  • 17.6. Italy
  • 17.7. Spain
  • 17.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 17.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 17.10. South Africa
  • 17.11. Denmark
  • 17.12. Netherlands
  • 17.13. Qatar
  • 17.14. Finland
  • 17.15. Sweden
  • 17.16. Nigeria
  • 17.17. Egypt
  • 17.18. Turkey
  • 17.19. Israel
  • 17.20. Norway
  • 17.21. Poland
  • 17.22. Switzerland

18. Asia-Pacific Cognitive Assessment & Training in Healthcare Market

  • 18.1. Introduction
  • 18.2. China
  • 18.3. India
  • 18.4. Japan
  • 18.5. Australia
  • 18.6. South Korea
  • 18.7. Indonesia
  • 18.8. Thailand
  • 18.9. Philippines
  • 18.10. Malaysia
  • 18.11. Singapore
  • 18.12. Vietnam
  • 18.13. Taiwan

19. Competitive Landscape

  • 19.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 19.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 19.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 19.3.1. Altoida , Inc.
    • 19.3.2. BrainCheck, Inc.
    • 19.3.3. Cambridge Cognition Ltd.
    • 19.3.4. Clario
    • 19.3.5. CNS Vital Signs, LLC
    • 19.3.6. CogniFit Ltd.
    • 19.3.7. Cogstate Ltd.
    • 19.3.8. Dividat, Inc.
    • 19.3.9. Elevate Labs, LLC
    • 19.3.10. Impact Applications Inc. by Riverside Assessments, LLC
    • 19.3.11. Koninklijke Philips N.V.
    • 19.3.12. Linus Health, Inc.
    • 19.3.13. Lumos Labs, Inc.
    • 19.3.14. Pearson Education, Inc.
    • 19.3.15. Posit Science Corporation
    • 19.3.16. Re:Cognition Health Limited
    • 19.3.17. Signant Health
    • 19.3.18. VoxNeuro Inc.
    • 19.3.19. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
    • 19.3.20. Brain Resource, Inc.
    • 19.3.21. HASOMED GmbH

20. ResearchAI

21. ResearchStatistics

22. ResearchContacts

23. ResearchArticles

24. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦