½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1808368

ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ¼­ºñ½º À¯Çüº°, ¹èÆ÷ ¹æ½Äº°, ±â¼ú ÅëÇÕº°, ½Ã¼³ À¯Çüº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Healthcare Facility Management Market by Service Type, Delivery Mode, Technology Integration, Facility Type - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 187 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 955¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 2025³â¿¡´Â CAGR 6.54%·Î 1,015¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â±îÁö 1,397¾ï 8,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ 2024³â 955¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ 2025³â 1,015¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ 2030³â 1,397¾ï 8,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 6.54%

Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ Àü·«À¸·Î ÀÇ·á ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®¸¦ Çõ½ÅÇϰí, ȯ°æ Àü¹Ý¿¡ °ÉÃÄ È¯ÀÚ Ä¡·á, ¿î¿µ ź·Â¼º ¹× ºñ¿ë È¿À²¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½Ãŵ´Ï´Ù.

ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®´Â Á¡Á¡ ´õ º¹ÀâÇØÁö´Â ½Ã´ë¿¡ ¾çÁúÀÇ ÀÇ·á ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÇÙ½ÉÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ȯÀÚµéÀÇ ±â´ëÄ¡°¡ ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺰¡ °­È­µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó, ½Ã¼³ÀÇ ¸®´õµéÀº Áß¿äÇÑ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó À¯Áöº¸¼öºÎÅÍ ÁÖº¯ Áö¿ø ±â´É±îÁö ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ ÁöÈÖÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´Â °úÁ¦¿¡ Á÷¸éÇØ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÅëÇØ ³­¹æ, ȯ±â, ±Þ¹è¼ö, ¼Ò¹æ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÌ Áß´Ü ¾øÀÌ °¡µ¿µÇ´Â ÇÑÆí, ÄÉÀÌÅ͸µ, û¼Ò, °æºñ, Á¶°æ ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ ÅëÇØ Ä¡·á¿Í »ý»ê¼ºÀ» ÃËÁøÇϴ ȯ°æÀÌ À¯ÁöµË´Ï´Ù.

Àü·Ê ¾ø´Â ±â¼ú, ±ÔÁ¦, ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ ÁÖµµÀÇ º¯È­·Î Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ ¼ºÀåÀ» À§ÇØ ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®ÀÇ ¿î¿µ ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀÌ ÀçÁ¤ÀÇµÉ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÃÖ±Ù ¸î ³â µ¿¾È ÀÇ·á ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®´Â ±â¼úÀÇ ºñ¾àÀûÀÎ ¹ßÀü, ±ÔÁ¦ ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®, ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚÀÇ ±â´ëÄ¡ »ó½ÂÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Å©°Ô ÀçÁ¤Àǵǰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. IoT ¿¬°á¼ºÀ» °®Ãá ½º¸¶Æ® ºôµù ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº ´õ ÀÌ»ó ¹Ì·¡ÁöÇâÀûÀÎ °³³äÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ÀÚ»ê ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ°ú ȯ°æ Á¦¾î¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ¿ä¼Ò·Î ÀÚ¸® Àâ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿¹Ãø ºÐ¼® Ç÷§ÆûÀº ÀáÀçÀûÀÎ ½Ã½ºÅÛ Àå¾Ö°¡ ¹ß»ýÇϱâ Àü¿¡ ¹Ì¸® Ç÷¡±×¸¦ »ý¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ¿¹¹æÀû À¯Áöº¸¼ö ¹× ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿© ¿¹±âÄ¡ ¸øÇÑ ¼­ºñ½º Áß´ÜÀ» Å©°Ô ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¿¡³ÊÁö °ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º ¸ñÇ¥¸¦ Áö¿øÇÏ°í ¿î¿µ ºñ¿ëÀÇ º¯µ¿¼ºÀ» ¿ÏÈ­Çϱâ À§ÇØ Àç»ý¿¡³ÊÁö¿øÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

2025³â ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ Á¶Á¤ÀÌ ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ÀÇ °ø±Þ¸Á, ¼³ºñÅõÀÚ, ¿î¿µ¿¹»ê¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡

ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ÀÇ ¿î¿µÀº ¼¼°è °ø±Þ¸Á°ú ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÏ°Ô ¿¬°áµÇ¾î Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ 2025³â ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ Á¶Á¤°ú °°Àº Á¤Ã¥ º¯È­¿¡ ƯÈ÷ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ±â ½±½À´Ï´Ù. ÷´Ü ±â°è ½Ã½ºÅÛ, Ư¼ö ¼¾¼­, °íÈ¿À² HVAC ºÎǰ µî ±¹Á¦ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¶´ÞµÈ ¼³ºñ ºÎǰÀº ¼öÀÔ ºñ¿ë »ó½Â¿¡ Á÷¸éÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¶´Þ ºñ¿ë »ó½Â ¾Ð·ÂÀº ÀÚº» ¿¹»êÀ¸·Î ÆÄ±ÞµÇ¾î ¾÷±×·¹À̵å Áֱ⸦ Áö¿¬½Ã۰í, »õ·Î¿î ±ÔÁ¦ Ç¥ÁØÀ» ÁؼöÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ°Ô ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº Á¶´Þ Àü·«À» Àç°ËÅäÇϰí, ´ëü °ø±Þ¾÷ü¸¦ Æò°¡Çϰí, ÀÚº» ÁöÃâÀ» °èȹÇÒ ¶§ ÃѼÒÀ¯ºñ¿ëÀ» °í·ÁÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¼­ºñ½º, ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø, ±â¼ú, ½Ã¼³ À¯Çü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÉÃþÀûÀÎ ÀλçÀÌÆ®·Î ÇコÄÉ¾î »ç¾÷¿¡¼­ Á¤¹ÐÇÑ Àü·« ¼ö¸³À» Áö¿øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀ» ´õ ±íÀÌ ÀÌÇØÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ÁÖ¿ä ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ¹üÁÖ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Áß¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¼­ºñ½º À¯Çüº°·Î ºÐ·ùÇϸé, ÇÏµå ¼­ºñ½º¿¡´Â °Ç¹° À¯Áö°ü¸®, Àü±â ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¼ö¸®, ¿¡³ÊÁö ÃÖÀûÈ­, ¼Ò¹æ ½Ã½ºÅÛ °Ë»ç, HVAC ±â´É, ±â°è ¼­ºñ½º Áø´Ü, ¹è°ü ¹«°á¼º Á¡°Ë µî ±â¹Ý ÀÎÇÁ¶ó Á¤ºñ°¡ Æ÷ÇԵ˴ϴÙ. ¹Ý¸é, ¼ÒÇÁÆ® ¼­ºñ½º´Â ¿µ¾ç °ø±Þ ¹× ±Þ½Ä ¾÷¹«, öÀúÇÑ Ã»¼Ò ¹× û¼Ò, ¾ß¿Ü Á¶°æ, ȯÀÚ ¹× ¸°³Ù ¼¼Å¹, ÇØÃæ ¹æÁ¦ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥, ÇÁ·±Æ® µ¥½ºÅ© ¹× ¸®¼Á¼Ç °¨µ¶, º¸¾È ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ, Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ Æó±â¹° ó¸® ´ëÃ¥ µî º¸¿ÏÀûÀÎ Áö¿ø ±â´ÉÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÕ´Ï´Ù. °¢ ¼­ºñ½º ÇÏÀ§ ±×·ìÀº °¢°¢ °íÀ¯ÇÑ ¿î¿µ ¸®µë°ú ±ÔÁ¦ °í·Á»çÇ×ÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ½Ã¼³ ÀÌ¿ë ÆÐÅϰú ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠¿ä±¸»çÇ׿¡ ¸Â´Â °ü¸® Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«, À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® µ¿Çâ°ú °úÁ¦¸¦ Çü¼ºÇϰí Áö¿ªº° ¿ªÇÐÀ» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

Áö¿ªÀû Â÷ÀÌ´Â ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® Àü·«ÀÇ Àü°³¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌĨ´Ï´Ù. ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä« ´ë·úÀº ¼º¼÷ÇÑ ½ÃÀåÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº ¼öÁØÀÇ ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö°¡ ¿ä±¸µÇ¸ç, ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ÀÎÇÁ¶ó°¡ Àß ±¸ÃàµÇ¾î ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿î¿µ»óÀÇ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§´Â Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º ¸ñÇ¥ ´Þ¼ºÀ» À§ÇÑ ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼Òºñ ÃÖÀûÈ­, ¿À·£ ±â°£ µ¿¾È ³ëÈÄÈ­µÈ ÇコÄɾî Ä·ÆÛ½ºÀÇ ÀÚ»ê ¾÷±×·¹À̵å, °æÀïÀû Â÷º°È­¸¦ À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Ã·´Ü µðÁöÅÐ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç ÅëÇÕ µîÀÌ ÁÖ¸¦ ÀÌ·ì´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, °è¾à»óÀÇ Çõ½ÅÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº º¥´õ °ü¸®¸¦ °£¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ°í ºñ¿ë È¿À²¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇØ ¹øµé ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨À» Á¡Á¡ ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ ¸ð»öÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®ÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÀ» ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇϰí, °æÀï ¿ìÀ§¸¦ ÁÖµµÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä Çõ½Å°¡ ¹× Àü·«Àû Çù·ÂÀÚ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϸµ

ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®¸¦ µÑ·¯½Ñ ȯ°æÀº ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø°ú ±â¼ú ÅëÇÕ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» °³Ã´ÇÏ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ Á¶Á÷ÀÌ Æ¯Â¡ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ´Ù±¹Àû Á¾ÇÕ ¼­ºñ½º ±â¾÷ºÎÅÍ Æ´»õ½ÃÀå Àü¹® ¾÷ü±îÁö, À̵é ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷µéÀº µðÁöÅÐ Ç÷§Æû, Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º, Àü·«Àû ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àû±ØÀûÀÎ ÅõÀÚ¸¦ ÅëÇØ Â÷º°È­¸¦ ²ÒÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¹Àº °³¹ß¾÷üµéÀÌ ±â¼ú °³¹ßÀÚ¿Í Çù·ÂÇÏ¿© ¿¡³ÊÁö °ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ °í±Þ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ½Ã¼³ Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À ÀüüÀÇ ÀÚ¿ø ¼Òºñ¸¦ ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÇÏ°í µ¿Àû ºÎÇÏ ºÐ»êÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

»õ·Î¿î °úÁ¦¸¦ ±Øº¹Çϰí, ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ ¿î¿µ ÃÖÀûÈ­¸¦ À§ÇÑ ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Àü·«Àû ·Îµå¸Ê°ú ½Çõ ½ÇÇà

¾÷°è ¸®´õµéÀº ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®ÀÇ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¸¦ Á¶Á÷ÀÇ ¸ñÇ¥¿Í ÀÏÄ¡½ÃŰ´Â Àü·«Àû ·Îµå¸ÊÀ» ¸¸µé¾î ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ÇൿÀ¸·Î ¿Å±æ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸ÕÀú, ÇÏµå ¹× ¼ÒÇÁÆ® ¼­ºñ½º Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î °¨»çÇÏ¿© À¯Áöº¸¼ö ÀÏÁ¤, ¿¡³ÊÁö »ç¿ë ÆÐÅÏ, Àη ¹èÄ¡ÀÇ ºñÈ¿À²¼ºÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ±âÁؼ± Æò°¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ ´Ü°èº° ½ÇÇà °èȹÀ» ¼ö¸³Çϰí, ¿¹Áöº¸Àü(predictive maintenance), ÁÖ¿ä ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ¿¡³ÊÁö ÃÖÀûÈ­ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ µî ¿µÇâ·ÂÀÌ Å« ÀÌ´Ï¼ÅÆ¼ºêÀÇ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¸¦ Á¤ÇÒ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ü°èÀûÀÎ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁý ¹× °ËÁõ ±â¼úÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÇ·á ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®ÀÇ ¿øµ¿·ÂÀ» »ó¼¼È÷ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â °­·ÂÇÑ Á¶»ç ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ »ó¼¼È÷ ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý¿¡¼­´Â Á¶»ç °á°úÀÇ Á¤È®¼º°ú ±íÀ̸¦ È®º¸Çϱâ À§ÇØ ´ÙÃþÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ» äÅÃÇß½À´Ï´Ù. 1Â÷ Á¶»ç¿¡¼­´Â ½Ã¼³Àå, À¯Áöº¸¼ö ¿£Áö´Ï¾î, ÇコÄÉ¾î °æ¿µÁø°úÀÇ ±¸Á¶È­µÈ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÅëÇØ ¾÷¹« ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§, ±â¼ú µµÀÔ ±ËÀû, ¿¹»ê Á¦¾à¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¾ò¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡, ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ Ç¥Àû Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¼­ºñ½º ¼öÁØ ¼º°ú, Á¶´Þ °úÁ¦, »õ·Î¿î ±ÔÁ¦ ¾Ð·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤·®Àû °üÁ¡À» ÆÄ¾ÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®ÀÇ È¸º¹Åº·Â¼º °­È­, È¿À²¼º Çâ»ó, Çõ½Å ÃËÁøÀ» À§ÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¿Í Àü·«Àû °úÁ¦ Á¤¸®

ÀÌ ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à¿¡¼­´Â ÷´Ü µðÁöÅÐ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç°ú ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä±¸»çÇ׺ÎÅÍ Á¤Ã¥ º¯È­·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÀçÁ¤Àû ¾Ð¹Ú¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö, ÀÇ·á ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®¸¦ º¯È­½ÃŰ´Â ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÎ Èû¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³»¿ëÀ» ´Ù·ç¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ ÆÐÅÏÀÌ µå·¯³ª°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °­·ÂÇÑ ±â¼ú Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ Áö¿øÀ» ¹Þ¾Æ Çϵå¿þ¾î ÀÎÇÁ¶ó À¯Áöº¸¼ö¿Í Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼­ºñ½º Á¶Á¤À» ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â Á¶Á÷Àº ´õ ³ôÀº ¼öÁØÀÇ ÀÚ»ê ¾ÈÁ¤¼º°ú ¿î¿µ ¹Îø¼ºÀ» ´Þ¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¼º¼÷ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­´Â Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º°ú ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺰¡ ¿ì¼±½ÃµÇ´Â ¹Ý¸é, ½ÅÈï±¹¿¡¼­´Â È®À强°ú ºñ¿ë È¿À²¼ºÀÌ °­Á¶µÇ´Â µî Áö¿ª ½ÃÀåÀÇ ´µ¾Ó½º¿¡ ¸Â´Â Àü·«ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ¼­ºñ½º À¯Çüº°

  • ÇÏµå ¼­ºñ½º
    • °Ç¹° À¯Áöº¸¼ö
    • Àü±â À¯Áöº¸¼ö
    • ¿¡³ÊÁö °ü¸®
    • ¹æÈ­ ½Ã½ºÅÛ
    • °øÁ¶
    • ±â°è ¼­ºñ½º
    • ¹è°ü
  • ¼ÒÇÁÆ® ¼­ºñ½º
    • ÄÉÀÌÅ͸µ¡¤Çªµå¼­ºñ½º
    • û¼Ò¡¤°ü¸® ¼­ºñ½º
    • Á¶°æ
    • ¼¼Å¹ ¼­ºñ½º
    • ÇØÃæ ¹æÁ¦
    • Á¢¼ö¡¤ÇÁ·ÐÆ®¿ÀÇǽº °ü¸®
    • º¸¾È ¼­ºñ½º
    • Æó±â¹° °ü¸®

Á¦9Àå ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ¹èÆ÷ ¹æ½Äº°

  • »ç³» ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®
  • ¾Æ¿ô¼Ò½Ì ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®
    • ¹øµé ¼­ºñ½º ÇÁ·Î¹ÙÀÌ´õ
    • ÅëÇÕ ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®(IFM)
    • ´ÜÀÏ ¼­ºñ½º ÇÁ·Î¹ÙÀÌ´õ

Á¦10Àå ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ±â¼ú ÅëÇÕº°

  • ºôµù Á¤º¸ ¸ðµ¨¸µ(BIM)
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ Áö¿ø ½Ã¼³ °ü¸®(CAFM)
  • ¿¡³ÊÁö °ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛ
  • ±â¾÷ ÀÚ»ê °ü¸®(EAM)
  • ÅëÇÕ Á÷Àå °ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛ(IWMS)
  • IoT ±â¹Ý ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ¼Ö·ç¼Ç

Á¦11Àå ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ½Ã¼³ À¯Çüº°

  • ÇмúÁ¶»ç±â°ü
  • ¿Ü·¡ ¼ö¼ú ¼¾ÅÍ
  • Áø´Ü ½ÇÇè½Ç ¹× ¿µ»ó Áø´Ü ¼¾ÅÍ
  • º´¿ø
  • Àå±â°£º´ ½Ã¼³
    • ¿ä¾ç½Ã¼³
    • ¿ä¾ç½Ã¼³
    • ÀçȰ ¼¾ÅÍ
  • Àü¹® ÄÉ¾î ¼¾ÅÍ

Á¦12Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦13Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦14Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ÇコÄÉ¾î ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦15Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024³â
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024³â
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • Aramark
    • Ecolab Inc.
    • 3M Company
    • ABM Industries Incorporated
    • Accruent
    • Amentum Services, Inc.
    • CBRE, Inc.
    • Compass USA
    • EMCOR Facilities Services, Inc.
    • Equans SAS
    • Forefront Healthcare
    • G4S Limited
    • Johnson Controls International PLC
    • Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc.
    • Medxcel Facilities Management, LLC
    • Mitie Group PLC
    • OCS Group Holdings Ltd.
    • Rekeep S.p.a.
    • Rubicon Professional Services
    • Serco Group PLC
    • SILA Solutions
    • SODEXO
    • Supreme Facility Management Limited
    • UEM Edgenta Berhad
    • Vanguard Resources, Inc.

Á¦16Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦17Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦18Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃÆ®

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦20Àå ºÎ·Ï

KSM 25.09.23

The Healthcare Facility Management Market was valued at USD 95.53 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 101.53 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.54%, reaching USD 139.78 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 95.53 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 101.53 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 139.78 billion
CAGR (%) 6.54%

Transforming Healthcare Facility Management with Holistic Strategies to Elevate Patient Care, Operational Resilience, and Cost Efficiency Across Environments

Healthcare facility management has become a linchpin for delivering high-quality care in an era of increasing complexity. With patient expectations evolving and compliance mandates intensifying, facility leaders face the challenge of orchestrating a broad spectrum of services, ranging from critical infrastructure maintenance to ambient support functions. Effective programs ensure that heating, ventilation, plumbing, and fire protection systems operate without interruption while catering, cleaning, security, and landscaping services maintain an environment conducive to healing and productivity.

As demographic shifts propel demand for ambulatory centers, specialty clinics, and long-term care environments, the need for scalable facility models intensifies. Technology adoption remains central to this evolution. Advanced energy management systems paired with Internet of Things-enabled sensors are enabling real-time monitoring of mechanical assets, reducing the risk of unscheduled downtime. Meanwhile, integrated workplace management tools allow administrators to optimize space utilization and align service schedules with fluctuating operational needs, delivering both cost containment and enhanced occupant satisfaction.

The interplay between regulatory frameworks and market dynamics further underscores the necessity of adaptive management strategies. Facility operators must navigate accreditation standards, environmental performance targets, and evolving health and safety protocols, all while balancing budgetary constraints and resource allocation pressures. Consequently, a unified approach that bridges hard and soft service disciplines, leverages data-driven insights, and fosters cross-functional collaboration stands as the cornerstone of modern healthcare facility excellence.

In the pages that follow, we explore the transformative shifts, tariff implications, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics, corporate strategies, and best practice recommendations shaping this sector. This executive summary synthesizes key findings to guide decision-makers through actionable pathways, empowering them to build resilient facilities that advance patient outcomes and operational agility.

Unprecedented Technological, Regulatory, and Stakeholder-Driven Shifts Redefining Operational Paradigms in Healthcare Facility Management for Sustainable Growth

In recent years, healthcare facility management has experienced a profound redefinition driven by converging technological breakthroughs, regulatory updates, and heightened stakeholder expectations. Smart building solutions equipped with IoT connectivity are no longer futuristic concepts but integral components of asset monitoring and environmental control. Predictive analytics platforms can flag potential system failures before they occur, enabling proactive maintenance scheduling and significantly reducing unplanned service disruptions. Furthermore, energy management systems are evolving to incorporate renewable energy sources, supporting sustainability goals and mitigating operational cost volatility.

Parallel to these technological advances, regulatory bodies have introduced more rigorous standards pertaining to safety, environmental impact, and infection control. Enhanced scrutiny on lifecycle maintenance of electrical systems, fire protection apparatus, and HVAC equipment has compelled facility managers to adopt more stringent maintenance protocols and risk assessment methodologies. These developments, coupled with evolving accreditation requirements for patient safety and service quality, underscore the necessity of robust compliance frameworks that integrate seamlessly into daily operations.

Stakeholder demands also play a pivotal role. Facility management teams must now address the increasing requirement for transparency and accountability from financial stakeholders, patients, and regulatory agencies alike. Demonstrating ROI through measurable KPIs, such as asset uptime, energy consumption metrics, and response times to service requests, is essential for securing ongoing investment and support. Moreover, workforce dynamics are shifting; talent retention and skills development have become critical as the industry seeks professionals adept at navigating both the technical and interpersonal aspects of facility leadership.

In this landscape of rapid change, healthcare organizations that embrace adaptive governance structures, invest in continuous process improvement, and foster cross-disciplinary collaboration will be best positioned to turn these transformative shifts into sustainable operational advantages.

Assessing the Far-Reaching Consequences of 2025 US Tariff Adjustments on Supply Chains, Capital Investments, and Operational Budgets in Healthcare Facilities

Healthcare facility operations are intricately tied to global supply chains, making them particularly vulnerable to policy changes such as the 2025 US tariff adjustments. Equipment components sourced internationally, including advanced mechanical systems, specialized sensors, and high-efficiency HVAC parts, may face increased import costs. This upward pressure on procurement expenses can ripple through capital budgets, delaying upgrade cycles and potentially compromising compliance with emerging regulatory standards. Stakeholders must therefore reassess sourcing strategies, evaluate alternative suppliers, and consider the total cost of ownership when planning capital expenditures.

Tariff impacts extend beyond direct equipment costs. Service providers that rely on imported consumables, such as filters, disinfectants, and specialized tools, will encounter cost escalations that can diminish profit margins for outsourced facility management contracts. Consequently, healthcare organizations may experience narrower budgetary margins for routine maintenance and unplanned repairs, necessitating revised contractual terms or increased service fees to maintain vendor engagement levels. In some cases, organizations may choose to accelerate domestic production of critical components or invest in higher-quality, long-lasting alternatives to mitigate recurring import costs.

Moreover, the broader economic implications of tariff-induced inflation can influence facility operating expenses, including utilities, security, and housekeeping services. As suppliers grapple with higher input costs, the pricing of bundled and integrated facility management services may reflect these increases, prompting facility directors to conduct more frequent cost benchmarking and renegotiation cycles. Effective risk mitigation strategies will involve scenario planning and stress-testing budgets against varied tariff and price inflation forecasts, ensuring organizations maintain sufficient financial buffers for essential operations.

To navigate this evolving policy landscape, facility management leaders should pursue agile procurement frameworks, strengthen partnerships with domestic and international vendors alike, and leverage data-driven spend analysis to identify cost-saving opportunities. Proactive engagement with supply chain stakeholders, combined with strategic planning, can transform tariff challenges into catalysts for operational efficiency and supply chain resilience.

Unveiling Deeper Insights into Service, Delivery, Technology, and Facility Type Segments to Drive Precision Strategies in Healthcare Operations

A nuanced understanding of the healthcare facility management market hinges on dissecting key segmentation categories. Service type segmentation reveals that hard services encompass foundational infrastructure maintenance, spanning building upkeep, electrical system repairs, energy optimization, fire protection system inspections, HVAC functionality, mechanical service diagnostics, and plumbing integrity checks. In contrast, soft services encompass complementary support functions, including nourishment provision and food service operations, thorough cleaning and janitorial routines, outdoor groundskeeping, patient and linen laundering, pest mitigation programs, front desk and reception oversight, security protocols, and comprehensive waste handling measures. Each service subgroup carries its own operational rhythms and regulatory considerations, requiring tailored management approaches that align with facility usage patterns and compliance demands.

Delivery mode segmentation sheds light on organizational structures, distinguishing between in-house facility management teams and outsourced arrangements. Outsourced solutions may be delivered by bundled service providers offering a suite of services under a single contract or by specialized single service vendors with focused expertise. Integrated facility management offerings bring together multiple service lines under a unified management umbrella, facilitating streamlined communication and consolidated reporting. This segmentation influences cost models, performance accountability measures, and the ease with which organizations can scale operations in response to fluctuating demand or capital constraints.

Technology integration segmentation underscores the accelerating role of digital platforms and connected systems within facility management. Building Information Modeling tools support detailed digital representations of physical assets, while Computer-Aided Facility Management software enables work order tracking and asset registry functions. Energy management systems leverage real-time consumption data to inform conservation initiatives, and enterprise asset management platforms facilitate lifecycle planning for critical equipment. Integrated workplace management systems further unify these capabilities, providing a centralized dashboard for space planning, resource allocation, and service scheduling. Emerging IoT-based solutions augment these platforms by delivering sensor-driven insights into environmental conditions and equipment performance, empowering predictive maintenance and remote oversight.

Finally, facility type segmentation encompasses a broad array of care environments, including academic and research institutes, ambulatory surgical centers, diagnostic and imaging facilities, acute care hospitals, long-term care facilities, and specialty centers. Each setting imposes unique service requirements, occupancy considerations, and regulatory mandates, underscoring the need for flexible management models that adapt to specific care modalities and patient demographics.

Highlighting the Distinct Regional Dynamics Shaping Healthcare Facility Management Trends and Challenges Across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific Markets

Regional variations exert significant influence over how healthcare facility management strategies unfold. In the Americas, mature markets demand high levels of regulatory compliance and have well-established facility management infrastructures. Operational priorities often center around optimizing energy consumption to meet sustainability goals, upgrading aging assets in long-standing healthcare campuses, and integrating advanced digital solutions to maintain competitive differentiation. Meanwhile, contractual innovation is on the rise, with healthcare systems increasingly exploring bundled service models to streamline vendor management and capture cost efficiencies.

By contrast, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa exhibit a diverse spectrum of maturity levels and regulatory landscapes. Western European nations are driven by stringent environmental and safety regulations, leading to widespread adoption of green building certifications and preventive maintenance frameworks. In the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, rapid healthcare facility expansion creates urgent needs for scalable soft service models and workforce development to support growing patient volumes. Throughout Africa, facility management practices often contend with infrastructural challenges and resource limitations, prompting a greater reliance on localized service providers and hybrid delivery approaches that blend traditional manual processes with targeted technology deployments.

In the Asia-Pacific region, dynamic economic growth and healthcare modernization schemes drive significant investment in both hard and soft services. Emerging markets such as India and Southeast Asian nations prioritize cost-effective facility solutions that can be replicated across rapidly multiplying outpatient clinics and diagnostic centers. Meanwhile, advanced economies like Japan and Australia focus on digital convergence, employing integrated workplace management systems and IoT-driven analytics to optimize care environments and support aging populations. Across Asia-Pacific, a growing emphasis on public-private partnerships is fostering collaboration between governmental bodies and service providers to expand healthcare infrastructure and elevate quality standards.

Collectively, these regional insights highlight the importance of context-sensitive strategies that address local regulatory requirements, resource availability, and market maturity. Leaders must tailor their facility management approaches to reflect these regional dynamics, ensuring that benchmarks and performance metrics align with both global best practices and localized imperatives.

Profiling Leading Innovators and Strategic Collaborators That Are Redefining Standards and Driving Competitive Advantage in Healthcare Facility Management

The healthcare facility management landscape is characterized by a diverse array of organizations that are pioneering novel approaches to service delivery and technology integration. From multinational integrated service firms to specialized niche providers, these leading companies are differentiating themselves through robust investments in digital platforms, sustainability initiatives, and strategic partnerships. Many are collaborating with technology developers to embed advanced analytics within energy management systems, enabling real-time monitoring of resource consumption and dynamic load balancing across facility portfolios.

A significant trend involves the formation of consortiums between construction and facility operations experts to bridge the gap between project delivery and ongoing maintenance. These alliances ensure that new building designs incorporate maintainability criteria from the outset, reducing lifecycle costs and mitigating risks associated with unforeseen infrastructure failures. In parallel, several technology providers have established joint ventures with professional service firms to develop end-to-end solutions, combining computer-aided facility management software, enterprise asset management platforms, and IoT-based condition monitoring systems under unified service agreements.

Innovation is also evident in workforce and training models. Leading firms are adopting virtual reality and simulation-based training for maintenance technicians, enhancing skill development while reducing safety incidents during on-site learning. In addition, strategic collaborations with academic institutions are fostering research into novel materials and antimicrobial surface treatments, directly addressing infection control priorities within healthcare environments.

Finally, the competitive landscape is further shaped by companies that leverage data-driven performance metrics to offer outcome-based service contracts. By aligning vendor compensation with key performance indicators such as system uptime, work order turnaround time, and energy consumption reductions, these providers create powerful incentives for continuous improvement. As a result, healthcare organizations gain greater visibility into service delivery outcomes, fostering a culture of accountability and innovation across the facility management ecosystem.

Implementing Strategic Roadmaps and Practices to Navigate Emerging Challenges and Harness Technological Innovations for Optimized Healthcare Facility Operations

Industry leaders can translate insights into concrete action by crafting strategic roadmaps that align facility management priorities with organizational goals. Initially, conducting a comprehensive audit of both hard and soft service portfolios will uncover inefficiencies in maintenance schedules, energy usage patterns, and staffing allocations. This baseline assessment should inform the development of phased implementation plans, prioritizing high-impact initiatives such as predictive maintenance rollouts and energy optimization programs across critical departments.

Organizations should then evaluate and select integrated technology platforms that cater to their unique service delivery models. Decision-makers must consider interoperability between building information modeling systems, integrated workplace management suites, and IoT sensor networks to ensure seamless data flow. Establishing clear governance structures around data ownership, cybersecurity protocols, and user access will bolster the integrity of these digital solutions and facilitate stakeholder buy-in. Simultaneously, investing in training programs for facility teams will accelerate technology adoption and enhance operational readiness.

As part of cost containment and resilience strategies, developing diversified sourcing frameworks is essential. By cultivating relationships with both domestic and international suppliers, facility directors can mitigate the impact of supply chain disruptions and tariff fluctuations. Partnering with local vendors for certain services may yield faster response times and deeper contextual knowledge, while maintaining global vendor networks ensures access to specialized components and emerging innovations.

Finally, embedding sustainability and patient-centric metrics into performance dashboards will drive continuous improvement. Regularly reviewing KPIs such as asset reliability, environmental footprint, and patient satisfaction scores creates accountability and underscores the strategic value of facility management. By iterating on these strategic roadmaps, industry leaders can maintain agility, foster cross-functional collaboration, and position their organizations for long-term success in an evolving healthcare landscape.

Detailing a Robust Research Framework with Systematic Data Collection and Validation Techniques for In-Depth Analysis of Healthcare Facility Management Drivers

This research initiative employed a multi-tiered methodology to ensure the accuracy and depth of findings. Primary research involved structured interviews with facility directors, maintenance engineers, and healthcare executives, providing firsthand insights into operational priorities, technology adoption trajectories, and budgetary constraints. Simultaneously, a series of targeted surveys captured quantitative perspectives on service-level performance, procurement challenges, and emerging regulatory pressures.

Secondary research complemented these efforts through a comprehensive review of industry publications, regulatory filings, and technical white papers. Information extracted from standards organizations and government health agencies was triangulated with vendor case studies and academic research to contextualize emerging trends. Proprietary databases were leveraged to analyze historical asset failure rates, energy consumption norms, and cost benchmarks across diverse facility types and geographic regions.

Data validation protocols included cross-referencing responses from independent sources and identifying discrepancies for follow-up clarification. Statistical analysis techniques were applied to survey data to isolate key drivers of operational variability and quantify the impact of technological interventions on maintenance efficiency. Geographic mapping tools were used to visualize regional disparities in service adoption, while scenario modeling assessed the potential effects of policy changes and tariff adjustments on procurement costs.

Ultimately, this systematic approach ensures that every conclusion presented in this executive summary is grounded in rigorously vetted evidence. By combining qualitative and quantitative insights across multiple research streams, the framework delivers a holistic understanding of the forces shaping healthcare facility management and supports strategic decision-making informed by robust data analysis.

Summarizing Critical Insights and Strategic Imperatives to Strengthen Resilience, Enhance Efficiency, and Foster Innovation in Healthcare Facility Management

This executive summary has illuminated the dynamic forces transforming healthcare facility management, from advanced digital solutions and evolving regulatory demands to the financial pressures induced by policy changes. A clear pattern emerges: organizations that integrate hard infrastructure upkeep with comprehensive soft service coordination, underpinned by robust technology platforms, are achieving higher levels of asset reliability and operational agility. Moreover, regional market nuances require tailored strategies, with mature markets prioritizing sustainability and compliance, while emerging economies focus on scalability and cost efficiency.

The segmentation analysis underscores the importance of differentiating service offerings, adopting flexible delivery models, and leveraging specialized technologies to address the unique requirements of each facility type. Meanwhile, the tariff impact assessment highlights the need for diversified supply chains and adaptive procurement frameworks that can absorb policy-driven cost fluctuations. Leading companies are setting precedents through collaborative partnerships, outcome-based contracts, and immersive training programs that elevate workforce capabilities and align vendor performance with organizational goals.

Taken together, these insights point to a strategic imperative: facility management must evolve from a reactive support function into a proactive value center that drives continuous improvement, risk mitigation, and sustainable growth. By embracing data-driven decision-making, fostering cross-functional collaboration, and investing in integrated solutions, healthcare organizations can secure the resilience and performance necessary to meet the demands of an ever-changing industry environment.

As healthcare delivery models continue to expand and patient expectations rise, the role of facility management will only grow in significance. The strategies and frameworks outlined here provide a roadmap for leaders seeking to navigate complexity, capitalize on innovation, and build facilities that deliver exceptional care experiences.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Implementation of IoT-enabled asset tracking systems for real-time equipment management and utilization optimization
  • 5.2. Integration of AI-driven predictive maintenance analytics to proactively prevent critical facility failures and downtime
  • 5.3. Adoption of advanced building automation systems to drive energy efficiency and support regulatory compliance
  • 5.4. Deployment of robotic sanitation and housekeeping solutions to enhance infection control and reduce labor dependency
  • 5.5. Utilization of digital twin technology for virtual modeling and simulation of facility operations and space planning
  • 5.6. Transition to cloud-based integrated facility management platforms for centralized data monitoring and reporting
  • 5.7. Emphasis on sustainable waste management and recycling protocols to meet evolving healthcare environmental standards
  • 5.8. Leveraging telemedicine infrastructure enhancements to optimize patient flow and maximize utilization of clinical space

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Healthcare Facility Management Market, by Service Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Hard Services
    • 8.2.1. Building Maintenance
    • 8.2.2. Electrical Maintenance
    • 8.2.3. Energy Management
    • 8.2.4. Fire Protection Systems
    • 8.2.5. HVAC
    • 8.2.6. Mechanical Services
    • 8.2.7. Plumbing
  • 8.3. Soft Services
    • 8.3.1. Catering & Food Services
    • 8.3.2. Cleaning & Janitorial Services
    • 8.3.3. Landscaping
    • 8.3.4. Laundry Services
    • 8.3.5. Pest Control
    • 8.3.6. Reception & Front Office Management
    • 8.3.7. Security Services
    • 8.3.8. Waste Management

9. Healthcare Facility Management Market, by Delivery Mode

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. In-house Facility Management
  • 9.3. Outsourced Facility Management
    • 9.3.1. Bundled Services Provider
    • 9.3.2. Integrated Facility Management (IFM)
    • 9.3.3. Single Service Provider

10. Healthcare Facility Management Market, by Technology Integration

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Building Information Modeling (BIM)
  • 10.3. Computer-Aided Facility Management (CAFM)
  • 10.4. Energy Management Systems
  • 10.5. Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
  • 10.6. Integrated Workplace Management Systems (IWMS)
  • 10.7. IoT-based Facility Management Solutions

11. Healthcare Facility Management Market, by Facility Type

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Academic & Research Institutes
  • 11.3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • 11.4. Diagnostic Laboratories & Imaging Centers
  • 11.5. Hospitals
  • 11.6. Long-Term Care Facilities
    • 11.6.1. Assisted Living Facilities
    • 11.6.2. Nursing Homes
    • 11.6.3. Rehabilitation Centers
  • 11.7. Specialty Care Centers

12. Americas Healthcare Facility Management Market

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. United States
  • 12.3. Canada
  • 12.4. Mexico
  • 12.5. Brazil
  • 12.6. Argentina

13. Europe, Middle East & Africa Healthcare Facility Management Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. United Kingdom
  • 13.3. Germany
  • 13.4. France
  • 13.5. Russia
  • 13.6. Italy
  • 13.7. Spain
  • 13.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 13.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 13.10. South Africa
  • 13.11. Denmark
  • 13.12. Netherlands
  • 13.13. Qatar
  • 13.14. Finland
  • 13.15. Sweden
  • 13.16. Nigeria
  • 13.17. Egypt
  • 13.18. Turkey
  • 13.19. Israel
  • 13.20. Norway
  • 13.21. Poland
  • 13.22. Switzerland

14. Asia-Pacific Healthcare Facility Management Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. China
  • 14.3. India
  • 14.4. Japan
  • 14.5. Australia
  • 14.6. South Korea
  • 14.7. Indonesia
  • 14.8. Thailand
  • 14.9. Philippines
  • 14.10. Malaysia
  • 14.11. Singapore
  • 14.12. Vietnam
  • 14.13. Taiwan

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 15.3.1. Aramark
    • 15.3.2. Ecolab Inc.
    • 15.3.3. 3M Company
    • 15.3.4. ABM Industries Incorporated
    • 15.3.5. Accruent
    • 15.3.6. Amentum Services, Inc.
    • 15.3.7. CBRE, Inc.
    • 15.3.8. Compass USA
    • 15.3.9. EMCOR Facilities Services, Inc.
    • 15.3.10. Equans SAS
    • 15.3.11. Forefront Healthcare
    • 15.3.12. G4S Limited
    • 15.3.13. Johnson Controls International PLC
    • 15.3.14. Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc.
    • 15.3.15. Medxcel Facilities Management, LLC
    • 15.3.16. Mitie Group PLC
    • 15.3.17. OCS Group Holdings Ltd.
    • 15.3.18. Rekeep S.p.a.
    • 15.3.19. Rubicon Professional Services
    • 15.3.20. Serco Group PLC
    • 15.3.21. SILA Solutions
    • 15.3.22. SODEXO
    • 15.3.23. Supreme Facility Management Limited
    • 15.3.24. UEM Edgenta Berhad
    • 15.3.25. Vanguard Resources, Inc.

16. ResearchAI

17. ResearchStatistics

18. ResearchContacts

19. ResearchArticles

20. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦