½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1809971

Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå : ¼­ºñ½º À¯Çüº°, Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°, ¾Ïȣȭ ¹æ½Ä À¯Çüº°, ºñÁî´Ï½º ¸ðµ¨º°, Àü°³ ¹æ½Äº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Encryption-as-a-Service Market by Service Type, Organization Size, Encryption Method Type, Business Model, Deployment Type, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 194 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡´Â 17¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 2025³â¿¡´Â 22¾ï ´Þ·¯, CAGR 24.46%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 66¾ï 1,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ 2024³â 17¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ 2025³â 22¾ï ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ 2030³â 66¾ï 1,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 24.46%

¿À´Ã³¯ µðÁöÅÐ º¸¾È ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º ½ÃÀåÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â Àü·«Àû °úÁ¦¿Í ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ¿ªÇÐÀ» ¼Ò°³ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

±â¾÷ÀÌ Á¡Á¡ ´õ º¹ÀâÇØÁö´Â µðÁöÅРȯ°æ¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¿ÀÇÁ»çÀÌÆ®¿¡¼­ ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°Ô ¹èÆ÷ÇÏ°í °ü¸®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °­·ÂÇÑ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ±× ¾î´À ¶§º¸´Ù ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼­ºñ½ºÇü ¾Ïȣȭ(Encryption-as-a-Service) ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº ±â¾÷ÀÌ ±â¹Ð¼º, ¹«°á¼º, ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺸¦ À¯ÁöÇϸ鼭 À¯¿¬ÇÏ°Ô ¿î¿µÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °­·ÂÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¼ö´ÜÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼­ºñ½º µµÀÔ °¡¼ÓÈ­¸¦ µÞ¹ÞħÇÏ´Â Àü·«Àû ¿ä±¸»çÇ×À» ¼Ò°³Çϰí, ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â À§Çù »óȲ, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå È®»ê, ±ÔÁ¦ ¾Ð·ÂÀÌ ÇÔ²² ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

Àü ¼¼°è ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º ȯ°æÀ» º¯È­½Ã۰í ÀÖ´Â Ã˸ÅÁ¦Àû ±â¼ú ¹× ±ÔÁ¦ º¯È­¸¦ »ìÆìº¾´Ï´Ù.

Áö³­ ¸î ³â µ¿¾È ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ »óȲÀº ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ ±â¼ú ¹ßÀü°ú ±ÔÁ¦ ȯ°æÀÇ º¯È­·Î ÀÎÇØ ÀçÁ¤Àǵǰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¾çÀÚ ÄÄÇ»ÆÃÀÇ À§Çù¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ »õ·Î¿î ¾Ïȣȭ Ç¥ÁØÀÌ µµÀԵǾú°í, ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¾÷üµéÀº Â÷¼¼´ë ¾Ë°í¸®Áò¿¡ ¸¹Àº ÅõÀÚ¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ±â¾÷µéÀº ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç °³¹ß ÆÄÀÌÇÁ¶óÀο¡ ¾Ïȣȭ ±â´ÉÀ» Á÷Á¢ ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ °­È­µÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±âÁ¸ÀÇ °æ°è ±â¹Ý ¸ðµ¨À» ³Ñ¾î Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³·Î ÀüȯÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

2025³â ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ Á¶Á¤ÀÌ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º °ø±Þ¸Á°ú ¼¼°è °¡°Ý ü°è¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â º¹ÇÕÀû ¿µÇ⠺м®

2025³â ÃÊ ¹Ì±¹ Á¤ºÎ°¡ µµÀÔÇÑ »õ·Î¿î °ü¼¼ Á¶Ä¡´Â ¾Ïȣȭ Çϵå¿þ¾î ¹× ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ºÎǰÀÇ ¼¼°è °ø±Þ¸Á°ú °¡°Ý ±¸Á¶¿¡ º¹ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡±â ½ÃÀÛÇß½À´Ï´Ù. HSM ¾îÇöóÀ̾ð½º, ¾Ïȣȭ °¡¼Ó±â, Ư¼ö ¾Ïȣȭ ¸ðµâ°ú °°Àº ±¸¼º¿ä¼ÒÀÇ ¼öÀÔ °ü¼¼ ÀλóÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø ¾÷ü´Â ºñ¿ë ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿Í Áö¸®Àû Á¶´Þ Àü·«À» ¸ðµÎ Àç°ËÅäÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´Â »óȲ¿¡ óÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

´Ù¾çÇÑ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º(Encryption-as-a-Service)ÀÇ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ±âÁØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÉÃþÀûÀÎ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ÅëÇØ ½ÃÀå ±âȸ¿Í ½ÃÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ ÀÌÇØ¸¦ ÅëÇØ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼­ºñ½º À¯Çü, Á¶Á÷ ÇÁ·ÎÇÊ, ¾Ïȣȭ ±â¹ý, ºñÁî´Ï½º ¸ðµ¨, ¹èÆ÷ ¿É¼Ç, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ »ê¾÷ÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô ¼­ºñ½ºÇü ¾Ïȣȭ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼­ºñ½º À¯ÇüÀ» »ìÆìº¸¸é, ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ¼öÁØÀÇ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º°¡ ÀÓº£µðµå º¸¾ÈÀ» ¿øÇÏ´Â ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î °³¹ßÀÚµé »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ Àα⸦ ²ø°í ÀÖ´Â ¹Ý¸é, µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º¿Í À̸ÞÀÏ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º´Â Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ Á¤º¸ º¸È£¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ¿ä¼Ò·Î ÀÚ¸® Àâ¾Æ°¡°í ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ű °ü¸® ¼­ºñ½º´Â ¾Ïȣȭ ŰÀÇ ¾ÈÀüÇÑ ¼ö¸íÁֱ⠿À» º¸ÀåÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϸç, Åäūȭ ¼­ºñ½º´Â °áÁ¦ ó¸® ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ÇÁ¶óÀ̹ö½Ã¿Í °°Àº Ư¼öÇÑ »ç¿ë »ç·Ê¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«, EMEA, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç µ¿Çâ¿¡¼­ Àü·«Àû Áö¿ª Àü¸ÁÀ» µµÃâÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

°æÁ¦ »óȲ, ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©, ±â¼ú ¼º¼÷µµ°¡ ´Ù¸£±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Áö¿ª ¿ªÇÐÀº ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º(Encryption-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁøÈ­¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â µ¥ °áÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«¿¡¼­´Â Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ÇÏÀÌÆÛ½ºÄÉÀÏ·¯°¡ Áö¿ª ½Ã½ºÅÛ ÅëÇÕ¾÷ü¿ÍÀÇ Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±× ¿µ¿ªÀ» È®ÀåÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±ÝÀ¶, ÇコÄɾî, ¼Ò¸Å µîÀÇ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ º¸±ÞÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Áö¿ª¿¡¼­´Â °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£ ¹ý±ÔÀÇ Á߿伺ÀÌ °­Á¶µÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, źźÇÑ ±â¼ú ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿Í ÇÔ²² °í±Þ Ű °ü¸® ¹× ½Ç½Ã°£ ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠º¸°í ±â´É¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¾÷ü ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϸµÀ» ÅëÇØ °æÀï Â÷º°È­ ¿ä¼Ò, Çõ½Å ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, ½ÃÀå Æ÷Áö¼Å´×À» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¾÷üµéÀº Â÷º°È­µÈ ±â´É, Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¼­ºñ½º Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À, ±×¸®°í ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º(Encryption-as-a-Service) »ýŰè Àü¹ÝÀÇ Çõ½ÅÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ¸¦ ÅëÇØ Ÿ»ç¿ÍÀÇ Â÷º°È­¸¦ ²ÒÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è ÇÏÀÌÆÛ½ºÄÉÀÏ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå º¥´õ´Â ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿Í °³¹ßÀÚ »ýŰ踦 Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ³×ÀÌÆ¼ºê º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿Í ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â ½ÉÃþÀûÀ¸·Î ÅëÇÕµÈ ¾Ïȣȭ ±â´ÉÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. º¸¾È Àü¹® ¾÷ü´Â °í±Þ Çϵå¿þ¾î º¸¾È ¸ðµâ, Ű ¹ÝÀÔ ¹× º¸°ü ¼Ö·ç¼Ç, °íµµ·Î ±ÔÁ¦µÈ ºÎ¹®¿¡ ¸ÂÃá ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠Á᫐ ±â´É¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÎ¾î ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ º¸¿ÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

Encryption-as-a-ServiceÀÇ Ã¤Åðú ÃÖÀûÈ­¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¾÷°è¸¦ ¼±µµÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¸ñÇ¥ ÁöÇâÀû ½ÇÇà °èȹ ¹× Àü·«Àû Á¦¾È °³¹ß

ºü¸£°Ô ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ¼­ºñ½ºÇü ¾Ïȣȭ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ¸®´õÀÇ ÁöÀ§¸¦ È®¸³Çϰí À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ ±â¾÷Àº Çõ½Å¼º, ¾÷¹« È¿À²¼º, °í°´ Áß½ÉÁÖÀÇ¿Í ±ÕÇüÀ» ÀÌ·ç´Â Àü·«Àû ÀÌ´Ï¼ÅÆ¼ºê¸¦ °áÇÕÇÏ¿© Ãß±¸ÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ù°, ¾Ïȣȭ ±â´ÉÀ» ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç °³¹ß ¶óÀÌÇÁ»çÀÌŬ¿¡ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© º¸¾ÈÀÌ ÈĹæÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ ±â¹ÝÀÌ µÇµµ·Ï º¸ÀåÇϰí, ½ÃÀå Ãâ½Ã ½Ã°£À» ´ÜÃàÇÏ°í º¹±¸ ºñ¿ëÀ» Àý°¨ÇÏ´Â DevSecOps ¹®È­¸¦ Á¶¼ºÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀº Ű ¹ÝÀÔ ¸ðµ¨°ú °ü¸®Çü ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨À» ¸ðµÎ Áö¿øÇÏ´Â ¸ðµâ½Ä Ű °ü¸® ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©·Î º¸¿ÏµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¼­ºñ½ºÇü ¾Ïȣȭ(Encryption-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ µÞ¹ÞħÇÏ´Â °­·ÂÇÑ È¥ÇÕ ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ý·Ð¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÀÚ¼¼È÷ ¾Ë¾Æº¾´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ Á¶»ç´Â ¼­ºñ½ºÇü ¾Ïȣȭ(Encryption-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀå¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®ÀÇ ¿ÏÀü¼º°ú Æ÷°ý¼ºÀ» È®º¸Çϱâ À§ÇØ °­·ÂÇÑ È¥ÇÕ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» äÅÃÇß½À´Ï´Ù. 2Â÷ Á¶»ç°¡ ºÐ¼®ÀÇ ±âÃʰ¡ µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ±ÔÁ¦ ¹®¼­, ¾÷°è ¹é¼­, ±â¼ú Àú³Î, º¥´õÀÇ ±â¼ú °³¿ä µî °ø°ø ¹× µ¶Á¡ ¼Ò½º¸¦ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÏ°Ô È°¿ëÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ÀÚ·áµéÀ» ÅëÇØ ¾ÏȣȭÆó Ç¥ÁØ, ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø ¸ðµ¨, Áö¿ªº° ¹ýÁ¦µµ µî¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ¹è°æÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

»õ·Î¿î À§Çù, ±â¼ú, ±ÔÁ¦ÀÇ ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ ¼Ó¿¡¼­ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ ¹Ì·¡ ±ËÀû¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ® Á¤¸®

¼­ºñ½ºÇü ¾Ïȣȭ(Encryption-as-a-Service) ½ÃÀåÀº ±â¼ú Çõ½Å, ±ÔÁ¦ º¹À⼺, ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â À§Çù »óȲÀÇ Á¢Á¡¿¡ À§Ä¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¾÷µéÀÌ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ÇÁ¶óÀ̹ö½Ã¿Í ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺸¦ ¿ì¼±½ÃÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, À¯¿¬ÇÑ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀº °è¼Ó °¡¼ÓÈ­µÉ °ÍÀ̸ç, ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¾÷üµéÀº ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø ¼­ºñ½º¿Í Á¦°ø ¸ðµ¨À» °³¼±ÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¾çÀÚ ³»¼º ¾Ïȣȭ ¹× ¿øÈ°ÇÑ ¸ÖƼ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ÅëÇÕ°ú °°Àº »õ·Î¿î ¿ä±¸´Â ¼­ºñ½º ±â´ÉÀÇ ´ÙÀ½ °æ°è¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÏ°í °ø±Þ¾÷ü´Â Á¶»ç ¹× Àü·«Àû ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ¸¦ ÃËÁøÇÒ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå : ¼­ºñ½º À¯Çüº°

  • ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ·¹º§ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º
  • µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º
  • ¸ÞÀÏ ¾Ïȣȭ ¼­ºñ½º
  • ¿­¼è °ü¸® ¼­ºñ½º
  • Åäūȭ ¼­ºñ½º

Á¦9Àå Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå : Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°

  • ´ë±â¾÷
  • Áß¼Ò±â¾÷

Á¦10Àå Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå : ¾Ïȣȭ ¹æ½Ä Á¾·ùº°

  • ºñ´ëĪ ¾Ïȣȭ
  • ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¾Ïȣȭ
  • ´ëĪ ¾Ïȣȭ

Á¦11Àå Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå : ºñÁî´Ï½º ¸ðµ¨º°

  • Á¾·® °ú±ÝÁ¦
  • ±¸µ¶ ±â¹Ý

Á¦12Àå Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå : Àü°³ ¹æ½Äº°

  • Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý
  • ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º

Á¦13Àå Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • Ç×°ø¿ìÁÖ ¹× ¹æÀ§
  • ÀºÇà, ±ÝÀ¶ ¼­ºñ½º, º¸Çè
  • Á¤ºÎ ¹× °ø°ø ºÎ¹®
  • ÇコÄɾî
  • IT¡¤Åë½Å
  • ¼Ò¸Å¡¤E-Commerce

Á¦14Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦15Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦16Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ Encryption-as-a-Service ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦17Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • Akeyless Security Ltd.
    • Amazon Web Services Inc.
    • Box, Inc.
    • Broadcom Inc.
    • Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • DigiCert Inc.
    • Entrust Corporation
    • Fortanix Inc.
    • Fortinet, Inc.
    • HashiCorp Inc.
    • HP Inc.
    • International Business Machines Corporation
    • McAfee Corporation
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • OneSpan Inc.
    • Oracle Corporation
    • Orca Security
    • Palo Alto Networks, Inc
    • Protegrity USA, Inc.
    • Sophos Limited
    • Thales Group
    • Trend Micro Inc.
    • Utimaco Management Services GmbH
    • Utimaco Safeware, Inc.
    • Venafi Inc. by CyberArk Software Limited

Á¦18Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦20Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃÆ®

Á¦21Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦22Àå ºÎ·Ï

KSM

The Encryption-as-a-Service Market was valued at USD 1.77 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.20 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 24.46%, reaching USD 6.61 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 1.77 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 2.20 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 6.61 billion
CAGR (%) 24.46%

Introducing the Strategic Imperatives and Evolving Dynamics Shaping the Encryption-as-a-Service Market in Today's Digital Security Environment

As businesses navigate an increasingly complex digital environment, the demand for robust encryption solutions that can be rapidly deployed and managed off-site is reaching unprecedented levels. Encryption-as-a-Service solutions offer a powerful means to safeguard data both at rest and in transit, enabling organizations to maintain confidentiality, integrity, and compliance while benefiting from operational flexibility. In this report, we introduce the strategic imperatives that underpin the accelerated adoption of these services and outline how evolving threat landscapes, cloud proliferation, and regulatory pressures are collectively driving market growth.

Our introduction frames the discussion by highlighting the convergence of cybersecurity imperatives with digital transformation initiatives, illustrating why encryption is no longer an auxiliary measure but a core component of enterprise architecture. By examining the symbiotic relationship between emerging technologies-such as multi-cloud deployments, edge computing, and the Internet of Things-and the need for dynamic key management, we set the stage for an in-depth exploration of market trends. Transitional perspectives illustrate how historical legacy encryption deployments are giving way to scalable, subscription-based service models that empower organizations to shift from capital expenditure to operational expenditure.

Through this foundational overview, readers will gain a clear understanding of how Encryption-as-a-Service solutions are designed to address critical security challenges, streamline compliance workflows, and foster innovation. This comprehensive introduction paves the way for subsequent sections, which delve into the transformative forces, tariff implications, segmentation nuances, and regional dynamics shaping the industry today.

Examining the Catalytic Technological and Regulatory Shifts That Are Reshaping the Encryption-as-a-Service Landscape Worldwide

Across the past several years, the Encryption-as-a-Service landscape has been redefined by rapid technological advancements and shifting regulatory frameworks. New cryptographic standards are being introduced to address quantum computing threats, prompting service providers to invest heavily in next-generation algorithms. Meanwhile, organizations are increasingly integrating encryption capabilities directly into application development pipelines, moving beyond traditional perimeter-based models and toward zero trust architectures.

Concurrently, data privacy regulations have become more stringent and geographically diverse, compelling businesses to adopt encryption-as-a-service solutions to maintain compliance across multiple jurisdictions. These regulatory pressures have catalyzed the emergence of specialized offerings that provide detailed audit trails and real-time compliance reporting. As a result, market participants are evolving their service portfolios to include advanced features such as bring-your-own-key (BYOK) capabilities and hardware security module (HSM) integrations.

Moreover, the competitive landscape has expanded to include cloud hyperscalers, pure-play security vendors, and niche providers, all vying to differentiate through unique value propositions. Transitioning from standalone encryption tools to fully managed service models, providers are bundling encryption with data loss prevention, tokenization, and secure key lifecycle management. This integrative approach not only simplifies deployment but also enhances visibility and control over encrypted assets.

Through these transformative shifts-driven by technology, regulation, and competitive innovation-the Encryption-as-a-Service market is being reshaped into a critical element of enterprise security ecosystems, setting the stage for further analysis of external influences and strategic imperatives.

Analyzing the Compound Effects of 2025 United States Tariff Adjustments on Encryption-as-a-Service Supply Chains and Global Pricing Structures

In early 2025, new tariff measures introduced by the United States government began to exert a compound effect on the global supply chains and pricing structures for encryption hardware and software components. Components such as HSM appliances, cryptographic accelerators, and specialized encryption modules have experienced elevated import duties, which in turn have driven service providers to reassess both their cost frameworks and geographic sourcing strategies.

These tariff adjustments have intensified pressure on margin structures, especially for providers that rely on imported hardware for on-premise deployments. In response, some vendors are accelerating their investments in cloud-native architectures to mitigate hardware cost inflation and shift toward digital delivery models. Meanwhile, enterprises with stringent latency and sovereignty requirements are exploring regional partnerships and localized manufacturing arrangements to avoid elevated duties and ensure regulatory compliance.

Furthermore, the combined impact of tariffs and the ongoing global chip shortage has underscored the need for greater supply chain resiliency. Service providers are diversifying their supplier base, establishing multi-sourcing agreements, and adopting predictive inventory management to anticipate and offset cost fluctuations. Transitional strategies also include the adoption of software-defined encryption solutions that reduce hardware dependency, thereby insulating service delivery from geopolitical and trade disruptions.

Overall, the cumulative impact of the 2025 United States tariffs has accelerated the shift toward cloud-based encryption services, prompted innovation in supply chain management, and reinforced the importance of flexible deployment models. These dynamics will continue to influence vendor strategies and customer adoption patterns as the industry adapts to a new era of trade complexity.

Unveiling Deep Insights Across Diverse Encryption-as-a-Service Segmentation Criteria to Illuminate Market Opportunities and Adoption Drivers

A nuanced understanding of market segmentation reveals critical insights into how distinct service types, organizational profiles, encryption methodologies, business models, deployment options, and end-user verticals drive the adoption of Encryption-as-a-Service solutions. When examining service types, it is evident that application-level encryption offerings are gaining traction among software developers seeking embedded security, while data encryption and email encryption services are becoming essential for comprehensive information protection. Key management services maintain a pivotal role by ensuring secure lifecycle operations for cryptographic keys, and tokenization services address specialized use cases in payment processing and data privacy.

Considering organizational size, large enterprises are increasingly leveraging subscription-based, fully managed services that integrate seamlessly with complex IT estates, whereas small and medium enterprises often favor pay-as-you-go models that provide cost-effective entry points without long-term commitments. In terms of encryption method types, symmetric encryption continues to dominate for high-performance, large-volume data processing, but asymmetric and hybrid encryption approaches are being adopted in scenarios requiring secure key exchange and multi-layered security architectures.

Deployment choices further distinguish market preferences, as cloud-based solutions appeal to organizations prioritizing scalability and rapid time to value, while on-premise deployments persist where data sovereignty, latency, or compliance constraints are non-negotiable. Finally, end users across aerospace and defense, banking, financial services, insurance, government, healthcare, IT and telecommunications, and retail and eCommerce each manifest unique encryption requirements driven by sector-specific risk profiles and regulatory obligations. By synthesizing these segmentation dimensions, stakeholders can identify high-opportunity niches and tailor value propositions to precisely meet customer needs.

Deriving Strategic Regional Perspectives from Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific Trends in the Encryption-as-a-Service Sector

Regional dynamics play a decisive role in shaping the evolution of the Encryption-as-a-Service market, as varying economic conditions, regulatory frameworks, and technological maturity levels create distinct growth trajectories. In the Americas, cloud hyperscalers are extending their reach through strategic partnerships with regional systems integrators, driving rapid uptake in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and retail. This region's emphasis on privacy legislation, coupled with a robust technology infrastructure, has accelerated demand for advanced key management and real-time compliance reporting capabilities.

Meanwhile, Europe, Middle East, and Africa exhibit a heterogeneous landscape where General Data Protection Regulation influences data residency requirements, prompting on-premise and hybrid deployment preferences. In markets such as Germany and the United Kingdom, stringent regulatory oversight has elevated the importance of encryption-as-a-service offerings that can deliver granular audit trails and support multi-cloud environments. The Middle East is witnessing growing government-led investments in secure digital transformation initiatives, whereas Africa's emerging tech ecosystems are gradually embracing cloud-based encryption as connectivity improves.

Across the Asia-Pacific region, strong momentum in digital payments, eCommerce, and telecommunications has translated into expanding use cases for tokenization services and application-level encryption. Countries like Australia, Japan, and Singapore are leading with progressive cybersecurity frameworks, driving the uptake of subscription models and managed key services. In contrast, some developing economies remain constrained by legacy infrastructure, favoring on-premise solutions that align with existing data center investments. By contextualizing these regional distinctions, industry participants can optimize market entry strategies and allocate resources to capitalize on localized growth catalysts.

Profiling Leading Encryption-as-a-Service Providers to Highlight Competitive Differentiators, Innovation Drivers, and Market Positioning

Leading service providers are distinguishing themselves through differentiated capabilities, comprehensive service portfolios, and strategic alliances that drive innovation across the Encryption-as-a-Service ecosystem. Global hyperscale cloud vendors leverage their extensive infrastructure and developer ecosystems to offer deeply integrated encryption functionalities that align with broader cloud-native security frameworks. Specialist security vendors complement these offerings by focusing on advanced hardware security modules, bring-your-own-key and hold-your-own-key solutions, and compliance-driven features tailored to highly regulated sectors.

Strategic partnerships between technology giants and niche cryptography firms are further enhancing service breadth, enabling seamless interoperability with data loss prevention, secure access service edge, and threat detection platforms. Organizations placing a premium on performance and low-latency requirements are adopting hybrid encryption frameworks that combine symmetric and asymmetric methods, while those prioritizing compliance are turning to providers with proven audit and reporting capabilities.

Innovation leaders continually invest in research to address emerging challenges such as quantum-safe encryption, post-quantum cryptography integration, and decentralized key management protocols. Meanwhile, development roadmaps in areas like tokenization for digital identity, zero trust key rotation automation, and AI-powered anomaly detection underscore the competitive intensity of the market. Through these collective efforts, key companies are setting benchmarks for service reliability, feature velocity, and customer-centric support models, thereby raising the bar for industry-wide offerings.

Developing Targeted Action Plans and Strategic Recommendations to Propel Industry Leaders Through Encryption-as-a-Service Adoption and Optimization

To establish and maintain leadership positions in the rapidly evolving Encryption-as-a-Service market, organizations must pursue a combination of strategic initiatives that balance innovation, operational efficiency, and customer-centricity. First, embedding encryption capabilities directly into application development lifecycles ensures that security is foundational rather than an afterthought, fostering a DevSecOps culture that accelerates time to market and reduces remediation costs. This approach should be complemented by a modular key management framework that supports both bring-your-own-key and managed-service models, thereby catering to diverse customer preferences.

Second, service providers should expand their global footprint through localized data center deployments and partnerships with regional system integrators to address data residency and compliance requirements. By leveraging hybrid architectures, they can offer customers the flexibility to seamlessly shift workloads between on-premise and cloud environments as regulatory or performance demands evolve. Additionally, forging alliances with leading cloud-native security and identity management vendors will amplify threat detection and response capabilities within encryption service offerings.

Third, organizations must prioritize research and development in quantum-resistant algorithms and post-quantum cryptography to anticipate future security imperatives. Establishing proof-of-concept initiatives that demonstrate interoperability with existing infrastructures will build customer confidence in long-term service viability. Finally, maintaining a consultative engagement model-wherein providers offer tailored security assessments, compliance advisory services, and ongoing health checks-will differentiate premium offerings and drive recurring revenue streams. By executing these actionable recommendations, industry leaders can accelerate adoption, optimize service portfolios, and reinforce customer trust.

Detailing a Robust Mixed-Methods Research Methodology Underpinning Comprehensive Insights into the Encryption-as-a-Service Market

This research effort employed a robust mixed-methods approach to ensure the integrity and comprehensiveness of insights into the Encryption-as-a-Service market. Secondary research formed the foundation of our analysis, drawing upon a wide range of public and proprietary sources including regulatory documents, industry white papers, technology journals, and vendor technical briefs. These materials provided critical context on cryptographic standards, service delivery models, and regional legislative landscapes.

Primary research was conducted through structured interviews and surveys with key stakeholders such as chief information security officers, IT architects, compliance officers, and service provider executives. Qualitative discussions illuminated strategic priorities, pain points, and anticipated technology shifts, while quantitative surveys quantified adoption patterns, feature preferences, and investment drivers across diverse geographies and industry verticals. Data triangulation techniques were applied to reconcile discrepancies between primary and secondary inputs, ensuring that findings are both reliable and representative.

Furthermore, expert panel reviews validated our segmentation frameworks, regional analyses, and tariff impact assessments, offering additional rigor through peer evaluation. A continuous quality assurance process, encompassing data verification checks and methodological audits, ensured that the final deliverables meet the highest standards of accuracy and objectivity. Collectively, this research methodology underpins the report's strategic recommendations and market insights, providing stakeholders with confidence in the robustness of our conclusions.

Concluding Reflections on the Future Trajectory of Encryption-as-a-Service Amid Emerging Threats, Technologies, and Regulatory Drivers

The Encryption-as-a-Service market stands at the nexus of technological innovation, regulatory complexity, and evolving threat landscapes. As enterprises prioritize data privacy and compliance, the adoption of flexible encryption solutions will continue to accelerate, driving service providers to refine their offerings and delivery models. Emerging imperatives-such as quantum-resistant encryption and seamless multi-cloud integration-will shape the next frontier of service capabilities, prompting vendors to invest in research and strategic partnerships.

Regional disparities will remain a defining feature, with growth trajectories influenced by local regulatory environments, infrastructure maturity, and sector-specific cybersecurity initiatives. The cumulative impact of trade policies and supply chain constraints has already catalyzed a shift toward cloud-native and software-defined encryption architectures, a trend that is expected to endure even as geopolitical tensions evolve. Segmentation dynamics will further inform product and market strategies, as providers tailor their service portfolios to address the differentiated requirements of large enterprises, small and medium businesses, and industry-specific use cases.

In this rapidly transforming environment, organizations that integrate encryption into their core operational frameworks, adhere to emerging standards, and foster collaborative ecosystems will secure competitive advantage. The insights presented in this report offer a strategic roadmap for navigating the complexities of the Encryption-as-a-Service market, empowering decision-makers to anticipate shifts, mitigate risks, and capitalize on growth opportunities.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Adoption of homomorphic encryption for secure multi-party computation in data analytics
  • 5.2. Integration of quantum-safe algorithms to future-proof encryption services against quantum attacks
  • 5.3. Emergence of decentralized key management solutions leveraging blockchain for enhanced trust
  • 5.4. Rising demand for encryption services tailored for edge computing and IoT environments
  • 5.5. Increasing regulatory compliance requirements driving demand for automated encryption orchestration
  • 5.6. Growth of Bring Your Own Key (BYOK) and Hold Your Own Key (HYOK) models in cloud encryption offerings
  • 5.7. Expanded use of encryption in protecting sensitive data within artificial intelligence and machine learning workflows

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Encryption-as-a-Service Market, by Service Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Application-level Encryption Service
  • 8.3. Data Encryption Services
  • 8.4. Email Encryption Services
  • 8.5. Key Management Services
  • 8.6. Tokenization Services

9. Encryption-as-a-Service Market, by Organization Size

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Large Enterprises
  • 9.3. Small & Medium Enterprises

10. Encryption-as-a-Service Market, by Encryption Method Type

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Asymmetric Encryption
  • 10.3. Hybrid Encryption
  • 10.4. Symmetric Encryption

11. Encryption-as-a-Service Market, by Business Model

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Pay-as-you-go
  • 11.3. Subscription-Based

12. Encryption-as-a-Service Market, by Deployment Type

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Cloud-Based
  • 12.3. On-Premise

13. Encryption-as-a-Service Market, by End User

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Aerospace & Defense
  • 13.3. Banking, Financial Services, Insurance
  • 13.4. Government & Public Sector
  • 13.5. Healthcare
  • 13.6. IT & Telecommunication
  • 13.7. Retail & eCommerce

14. Americas Encryption-as-a-Service Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. United States
  • 14.3. Canada
  • 14.4. Mexico
  • 14.5. Brazil
  • 14.6. Argentina

15. Europe, Middle East & Africa Encryption-as-a-Service Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. United Kingdom
  • 15.3. Germany
  • 15.4. France
  • 15.5. Russia
  • 15.6. Italy
  • 15.7. Spain
  • 15.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 15.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 15.10. South Africa
  • 15.11. Denmark
  • 15.12. Netherlands
  • 15.13. Qatar
  • 15.14. Finland
  • 15.15. Sweden
  • 15.16. Nigeria
  • 15.17. Egypt
  • 15.18. Turkey
  • 15.19. Israel
  • 15.20. Norway
  • 15.21. Poland
  • 15.22. Switzerland

16. Asia-Pacific Encryption-as-a-Service Market

  • 16.1. Introduction
  • 16.2. China
  • 16.3. India
  • 16.4. Japan
  • 16.5. Australia
  • 16.6. South Korea
  • 16.7. Indonesia
  • 16.8. Thailand
  • 16.9. Philippines
  • 16.10. Malaysia
  • 16.11. Singapore
  • 16.12. Vietnam
  • 16.13. Taiwan

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 17.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 17.3.1. Akeyless Security Ltd.
    • 17.3.2. Amazon Web Services Inc.
    • 17.3.3. Box, Inc.
    • 17.3.4. Broadcom Inc.
    • 17.3.5. Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • 17.3.6. DigiCert Inc.
    • 17.3.7. Entrust Corporation
    • 17.3.8. Fortanix Inc.
    • 17.3.9. Fortinet, Inc.
    • 17.3.10. HashiCorp Inc.
    • 17.3.11. HP Inc.
    • 17.3.12. International Business Machines Corporation
    • 17.3.13. McAfee Corporation
    • 17.3.14. Microsoft Corporation
    • 17.3.15. OneSpan Inc.
    • 17.3.16. Oracle Corporation
    • 17.3.17. Orca Security
    • 17.3.18. Palo Alto Networks, Inc
    • 17.3.19. Protegrity USA, Inc.
    • 17.3.20. Sophos Limited
    • 17.3.21. Thales Group
    • 17.3.22. Trend Micro Inc.
    • 17.3.23. Utimaco Management Services GmbH
    • 17.3.24. Utimaco Safeware, Inc.
    • 17.3.25. Venafi Inc. by CyberArk Software Limited

18. ResearchAI

19. ResearchStatistics

20. ResearchContacts

21. ResearchArticles

22. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦