시장보고서
상품코드
1847614

화이트 스피릿 시장 : 등급, 유통 채널, 용도, 최종 이용 산업별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

White Spirit Market by Grade, Distribution Channel, Application, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 180 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

화이트 스피릿 시장은 2032년까지 115억 3,000만 달러에 이르고, CAGR 4.44%를 보일 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 : 2024년 81억 4,000만 달러
추정 연도 : 2025년 85억 달러
예측 연도 : 2032년 115억 3,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 4.44%

산업 응용 분야에서 화이트 스피릿의 전략적 중요성과 상업적 결정을 형성하는 규제, 안전 및 공급 요인의 교차점을 간결한 프레임워크로 제시합니다.

화이트 스피릿은 용해도 프로파일, 인화점 특성, 탄화수소계 배합물과의 상용성으로 인해 산업 및 가정 용도의 핵심 용매로 평가받고 있습니다. 이 소개에서는 변화하는 화학 환경 속에서 화이트 스피릿의 현대적 역할을 정리하고, 코팅제 제조업체, 탈지 가공 제조업체, 세정제 제조업체의 요구사항이 변화하고 있음을 강조합니다. 또한, 환경적 모니터링, 규제 업데이트, 물류 제약이 최종 사용자의 요구와 공급자의 행동을 어떻게 변화시키고 있는지에 대해서도 설명합니다.

시장 진출기업들이 등급 선택, 공급 신뢰성, 규정 준수 경로를 명확히 하기 위해 노력하는 가운데, 이 경영진 요약은 조달 및 혁신 선택에 가장 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있는 기술적, 상업적 압력을 추출한 것입니다. 이어진 서술에서는 방향족의 함량, 유통 전략, 용도별 성능 고려사항이 고객의 선호도에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 추적합니다. 또한, 소개에서는 화이트 스피리츠의 전통적인 용도와 지속가능성 및 안전에 대한 새로운 요구가 어떻게 융합되고 있는지를 강조하며, 제조업체들이 제품 포트폴리오와 다운스트림 가치 제안을 재검토할 것을 촉구하고 있습니다.

마지막으로, 이 글의 서두에서는 통합적 의사결정의 중요성을 강조하고 있습니다. 조달 리더는 규제 리스크와 평판 노출에 대한 업무 성과와 균형을 맞추어야 하며, R&D 팀은 방향족 함량을 낮추거나 대체 용매를 혼합하여 성능을 유지하는 개선 경로를 우선순위에 두어야 합니다. 본 브리프는 독자들이 간결한 오리엔테이션을 통해 이후 분석 섹션을 더 깊이 있게 읽을 수 있도록 하는 것을 목적으로 합니다.

화이트 스피리츠공급망, 제품 포트폴리오, 최종 사용자의 기대 성능 재편, 규제, 기술, 유통의 중요한 변화 개요

화이트 스피릿을 둘러싼 환경은 규제 강화, 용도 요구 사항의 진화, 공급망 재편으로 인해 일련의 변화의 시기를 맞이하고 있습니다. 첫째, 휘발성 유기 화합물 및 방향족 탄화수소 노출에 대한 규제로 인해 생산자와 다운스트림 배합자는 노동 위험과 환경 위험을 줄이기 위해 저방향족 등급과 탈방향족 등급을 평가하게 되었습니다. 그 결과, 제품 포트폴리오를 재구성하고, 솔벤시 파워와 개선된 안전성 프로파일의 균형을 맞춘 차별화된 기술 등급을 제공하게 되었습니다.

둘째, 코팅 및 세정 부문이 수명주기 성능과 규정 준수를 우선시함에 따라 최종 용도 수요 패턴이 변화하고 있습니다. 건축용 도료와 자동차 도료는 냄새와 배기가스, 사용자 안전에 점점 더 민감해지고 있으며, 저방향족 및 탈방향족 등급이 선호되고 있습니다. 한편, 산업용 탈지 용도 중 일부는 용매 강도가 높은 고방향족 등급에 대한 의존도가 높아지면서 밸류체인 전체에서 두 가지 제품 진화가 이루어지고 있습니다.

셋째, 유통 및 조달 채널이 진화하고 있습니다. 디지털 판매 채널이 소량 및 특수 제품 구매에 있어서는 디지털 판매 채널의 지지를 받고 있지만, 대량 공급 및 기술 지원의 경우 기존 대리점과의 관계는 여전히 필수적입니다. 이와 함께 운송수단의 제약과 지역적 규제 차이로 인해 물류의 복잡성이 증가하고 있으며, 제조업체들은 재고 전략과 생산 거점의 지역화를 재검토해야 하는 상황에 직면해 있습니다.

마지막으로, 기술 혁신은 대체와 성능 향상의 길을 열어주고 있습니다. 공용매 혼합, 용매 회수 기술 및 공정 엔지니어링의 발전으로 인해 배합자는 주요 성능 지표를 희생하지 않고도 방향족 함량을 줄일 수 있게 되었습니다. 이러한 변화를 종합하면, 상업적 민첩성, 규제적 선견지명, 기술적 적응성이 경쟁의 포지셔닝을 결정하는 역동적인 환경이 조성되고 있습니다.

2025년 미국의 관세 조정이 화이트 스피릿의 가치사슬 전반에 걸쳐 공급업체 선택, 물류 계획, 조달 탄력성을 어떻게 재구축하고 있는지를 명료한 시각으로 종합합니다.

최근 미국이 2025년에 도입한 관세 조치와 무역 정책 조정은 화이트 스피릿의 밸류체인 전체에 중층적인 영향을 미치고, 비용 구조, 조달 결정, 재고 계획을 변화시키고 있습니다. 관세 변화는 국내 공급과 수입 공급의 상대적 매력에 영향을 미치고, 구매자가 공급업체 구성과 조달 리드타임을 재검토하도록 유도하고 있습니다. 이에 따라 많은 다운스트림 사용자들은 계약 조건을 강화하고, 안전 재고를 늘리고, 단기적인 노출을 줄이기 위해 대체 조달 경로를 모색하고 있습니다.

누적 영향은 직접적인 비용에 대한 영향에 그치지 않습니다. 수입 관세로 인해 일부 다국적 공급업체는 지역 생산 투자를 가속화하거나 관세 발생을 최소화하기 위해 배송 경로를 변경하기도 했습니다. 이러한 물류적 회피는 리드타임의 연장, 변동 운임 등의 2차적인 영향을 초래하고, 코팅 및 세척 분야의 적시 생산 전략에 영향을 미치고 있습니다. 또한, 관세의 불확실성은 공급업체의 투명성과 계약상의 유연성에 대한 프리미엄을 높이고, 복수 원산지 공급 계약과 계약 갱신 주기의 단축에 대한 수요를 증가시키고 있습니다.

경쟁 측면에서는 관세 변동을 피하기 위해 조달팀이 근해에서 대안을 모색하는 가운데 국내 소규모 생산자들이 혜택을 보는 경우도 있지만, 광범위한 사업을 전개하는 세계 정유사들은 규모를 활용해 관세를 흡수하거나 완화하는 경우도 있습니다. 중요한 것은 관세에 영향을 받는 역학이 규제 및 환경적 압력과 상호 영향을 미치면서 배합 담당자가 한계적인 비용 우위보다 등급 특성 및 현지 규정 준수를 우선시할 수밖에 없는 경우가 있다는 점입니다.

앞으로 이해관계자들은 관세를 조달 탄력성에 영향을 미치는 몇 가지 구조적 변수 중 하나로 취급할 필요가 있습니다. 신중한 대응은 다양한 조달, 시나리오에 따른 공급 계획, 관세 변동을 고려한 상업적 협정 강화를 결합하여 전략적 공급업체와의 관계를 유지하면서 사업의 연속성을 유지하는 것입니다.

등급 선택, 유통 경로, 용도별 하위 부문, 최종 사용 산업이 차별화된 기술 및 상업적 전략을 추진하는 방법, 심층 세분화 통찰력을 제공합니다.

부문 수준의 역학은 제품 등급, 유통 경로, 이용 사례, 최종 사용 산업별 차별화 전략을 정당화하는 미묘한 기술적, 상업적 패턴을 드러냅니다. 시장 진출기업은 등급에 따라 탈방향족 제품, 고방향족 제품, 저방향족 제품을 구분하고 있습니다. 각 등급은 배합 및 최종 사용자가 수용 가능한 용해력, 냄새 프로파일, 작업 안전성에 대한 트레이드오프를 제시합니다. 탈취 등급은 냄새와 노출 감소가 우선시되는 경우 점점 더 선호되고 있으며, 고방향족 등급은 용해력이 최우선인 고부하 탈지에 있어 그 중요성이 유지되고 있습니다. 저방향족 등급은 성능과 규제 적합성의 절충안을 제공하는 중간 영역을 차지합니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 화이트 스피릿 시장 : 등급별

  • 탈방향화
  • 고방향족
  • 저방향족

제9장 화이트 스피릿 시장 : 유통 채널별

  • 유통업체
  • 전자상거래
  • 소매

제10장 화이트 스피릿 시장 : 용도별

  • 세정제
    • 가정 청소
    • 산업용 세정
  • 탈지제
    • 엔진 탈지
    • 금속 탈지
  • 페인트 시너
    • 건축용 페인트
    • 자동차용 페인트
    • 산업용 코팅

제11장 화이트 스피릿 시장 : 최종 이용 산업별

  • 자동차
  • 건설
  • 가구
  • 해양

제12장 화이트 스피릿 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제13장 화이트 스피릿 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제14장 화이트 스피릿 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제15장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • Exxon Mobil Corporation
    • Royal Dutch Shell plc
    • TotalEnergies SE
    • China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation
    • LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
    • Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC
    • PetroChina Company Limited
    • BP p.l.c.
    • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
    • PT Pertamina(Persero)
LSH 25.10.29

The White Spirit Market is projected to grow by USD 11.53 billion at a CAGR of 4.44% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 8.14 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 8.50 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 11.53 billion
CAGR (%) 4.44%

A concise framing of white spirit's strategic importance across industrial uses and the intersecting regulatory, safety, and supply factors shaping commercial decisions

White spirit remains a cornerstone solvent within industrial and household applications, valued for its solvency profile, flash point characteristics, and compatibility with hydrocarbon-based formulations. This introduction frames the solvent's contemporary role amid a shifting chemical landscape, emphasizing evolving demands from coatings formulators, degreasing operations, and cleaning product manufacturers. It also contextualizes how environmental scrutiny, regulatory updates, and logistical constraints are reshaping end-user requirements and supplier behaviors.

As market participants seek greater clarity on grade selection, supply reliability, and compliance pathways, this executive summary distills the technical and commercial pressures most likely to influence procurement and innovation choices. The narrative that follows traces how aromatics content, distribution strategies, and application-specific performance considerations factor into customer preferences. Moreover, the introduction highlights how legacy uses of white spirit are converging with emergent sustainability and safety imperatives, prompting manufacturers to reassess product portfolios and downstream value propositions.

Finally, this opening underscores the importance of integrated decision-making: procurement leaders must balance operational performance against regulatory risk and reputational exposure, while R&D teams prioritize reformulation pathways that maintain performance with lower aromatic content or alternative solvent blends. The brief aims to equip readers with a concise orientation that supports deeper reading of the subsequent analytical sections.

An overview of the pivotal regulatory, technological, and distribution shifts realigning white spirit supply chains, product portfolios, and end-user performance expectations

The landscape surrounding white spirit is undergoing a series of transformative shifts driven by regulatory tightening, evolving application requirements, and supply chain realignments. First, regulatory emphasis on volatile organic compounds and aromatic hydrocarbon exposures has incentivized producers and downstream formulators to evaluate lower aromatic and dearomatized grades to reduce occupational and environmental risk. Consequently, product portfolios are being reconfigured to offer differentiated technical grades that balance solvency power with improved safety profiles.

Second, end-use demand patterns are shifting as coatings and cleaning sectors prioritize lifecycle performance and compliance. Architectural and automotive coatings are increasingly sensitive to odor, emission, and user-safety attributes, which favors low-aromatic and dearomatized variants. At the same time, certain industrial degreasing applications continue to rely on higher-aromatic grades where solvency strength is non-negotiable, creating a dual-track product evolution across the value chain.

Third, distribution and procurement channels are evolving: digital sales channels gain traction for small-batch and specialty purchases, while established distributor relationships remain essential for bulk supply and technical support. In parallel, logistics complexity has amplified due to modal constraints and regional regulatory differences, prompting manufacturers to revisit inventory strategies and localized production footprints.

Finally, technical innovation is opening pathways for substitution and performance enhancement. Advancements in co-solvent blends, solvent recovery technologies, and process engineering are enabling formulators to reduce aromatic content without sacrificing key performance metrics. Taken together, these shifts create a dynamic environment in which commercial agility, regulatory foresight, and technical adaptability will determine competitive positioning.

A clear-eyed synthesis of how 2025 United States tariff adjustments are reshaping supplier selection, logistics planning, and procurement resilience across the white spirit value chain

Recent tariff measures and trade policy adjustments introduced by the United States in 2025 have created layered effects across the white spirit value chain, altering cost structures, sourcing decisions, and inventory planning. Tariff changes have influenced the relative attractiveness of domestic versus imported supply, prompting buyers to reassess supplier mixes and procurement lead times. In response, many downstream users have tightened contract terms, increased safety stocks, and sought alternative sourcing corridors to mitigate short-term exposure.

The cumulative impact extends beyond direct cost implications. Import duties have prompted some multinational suppliers to accelerate regional production investments or re-route shipments to minimize tariff incidence. These logistical workarounds generate secondary effects, such as longer lead times and variable freight costs, which in turn influence just-in-time manufacturing strategies across coatings and cleaning segments. Additionally, tariff uncertainty has elevated the premium on supplier transparency and contractual flexibility, increasing demand for multi-origin supply agreements and shorter contract renewal cycles.

From a competitive perspective, smaller domestic producers have benefited in certain instances as procurement teams explore near-shore alternatives to avoid tariff volatility, while global refiners with broad operational footprints have leveraged their scale to absorb or mitigate tariff pass-through. Importantly, tariff-driven dynamics interact with regulatory and environmental pressures, sometimes compelling formulators to prioritize grade attributes or local compliance over marginal cost advantages.

Looking ahead, stakeholders must treat tariffs as one of several structural variables that affect procurement resilience. The prudent response combines diversified sourcing, scenario-based supply planning, and strengthened commercial agreements that account for duty fluctuations, thereby preserving operational continuity while keeping open pathways for strategic supplier relationships.

Deep segmentation insights revealing how grade selection, distribution pathways, application subsegments, and end-use industries drive differentiated technical and commercial strategies

Segment-level dynamics reveal nuanced technical and commercial patterns that warrant differentiated strategies by product grade, distribution pathway, application use case, and end-use sector. Based on Grade, market participants distinguish between dearomatized, high aromatic, and low aromatic products; each grade presents trade-offs in solvency power, odor profile, and occupational safety that inform formulation and end-user acceptance. Dearomatized grades are increasingly favored where odor and exposure reduction are priorities, while high aromatic grades retain relevance in heavy-duty degreasing where solvency strength is paramount. Low aromatic variants occupy an intermediate space, offering a compromise between performance and regulatory acceptability.

Based on Distribution Channel, the landscape is bifurcating between traditional distributor models, ecommerce platforms, and retail outlets. Distributors continue to dominate bulk transactions and provide critical technical support and logistics coordination, whereas ecommerce routes are accelerating accessibility for specialty purchases and small-batch customers. Retail channels maintain visibility for household cleaning formulations and consumer-facing paint thinner offerings, influencing brand presence and end-user education.

Based on Application, white spirit's use spans cleaning agents, degreasing agents, and paint thinner roles, with each application containing further technical subsegments. The Cleaning Agents classification is differentiated between household cleaning and industrial cleaning, implicating different regulatory thresholds and packaging requirements. The Degreasing Agents category is further split into engine degreasing and metal degreasing, where solvency strength and flash point considerations diverge sharply. The Paint Thinner segment is segmented into architectural paints, automotive paints, and industrial coatings; each subsegment demands specific evaporation profiles, compatibility with resin systems, and odor management strategies.

Based on End Use Industry, demand drivers vary across automotive, construction, furniture, and marine sectors. Automotive applications prioritize consistent performance in paint and degreasing processes under stringent durability and finish criteria. Construction and furniture sectors emphasize workability, drying profiles, and indoor air quality, which steers preference toward low-odor and lower-aromatic grades. Marine uses continue to require products that withstand harsh environments and provide robust surface-preparation capabilities. Together, these segmentation insights indicate that a one-size-fits-all approach is untenable; instead, suppliers and formulators must align grade offerings, distribution footprints, and technical support to the distinct performance and regulatory demands of each segment.

A comparative regional analysis that highlights divergent regulatory pressures, logistical realities, and end-user preferences across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific geographies

Regional patterns demonstrate that supply, regulatory landscapes, and end-user behaviors vary significantly across major geographies, requiring tailored commercial and technical approaches. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on worker safety and state-level environmental rules has increased demand for lower-odor and lower-aromatic grades; meanwhile, the region benefits from integrated logistics corridors that support bulk distribution and close collaboration between chemical producers and downstream formulators. North American end-users often prioritize supplier reliability and technical service capabilities when selecting partners.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity is heightened by a patchwork of standards and by strong environmental policy drivers that promote emissions reduction and extended producer responsibility. EMEA customers frequently require rigorous documentation and compliance assurance, which elevates the importance of material safety data, product stewardship programs, and localized regulatory expertise. Additionally, the region shows active interest in sustainability credentials and solvent recovery capabilities, which influence procurement preferences and product development.

Asia-Pacific presents a heterogeneous landscape where rapid industrialization, expanding coatings manufacturing, and variable regulatory environments coexist. In many APAC markets, demand growth for automotive and construction coatings remains robust, creating steady consumption of both standard and specialty white spirit grades. Supply chain considerations, including proximity to refining capacity and regional trade agreements, significantly affect cost structures and sourcing strategies. Collectively, regional insights suggest that a decentralized commercial model, reinforced by localized regulatory competence and targeted technical service, is more effective than a purely centralized approach.

Strategic competitive intelligence outlining how producers, channel partners, and formulators differentiate through grade breadth, technical service, and supply reliability

Competitive dynamics among producers, distributors, and formulators center on product differentiation, technical support, and reliability of supply. Leading manufacturers increasingly emphasize portfolio breadth across dearomatized, low aromatic, and high aromatic grades to serve distinct application needs while investing in process technologies that reduce emissions and improve recovery efficiency. Larger refiners capitalize on integrated operations to offer multi-origin supply and absorb short-term trade disruptions, whereas specialized producers focus on niche grade performance and customer-specific formulations.

Distributors and channel partners compete on the combination of logistics capability, inventory availability, and technical advisory services. Those that provide formulators and industrial users with on-site technical support, regulatory guidance, and rapid-response logistics earn preferential consideration, especially in segments where downtime or finish quality is mission-critical. In parallel, ecommerce entrants are expanding into specialty sales, leveraging digital catalogs and rapid fulfillment to serve small-batch or emergent customers.

Downstream formulators that control proprietary solvent blends and performance-enhancing additives are consolidating relationships with suppliers to secure competitive advantage in coatings, degreasing, and cleaning product lines. Meanwhile, companies that demonstrate strong sustainability credentials, solvent recovery programs, and transparent supply chains are positioned to meet rising procurement requirements from environmentally conscious OEMs and large commercial buyers.

Overall, competitive success hinges on aligning technical capabilities with service delivery: producers and channel partners that can reliably deliver the right grade, document compliance, and support rapid formulation adjustments will maintain an edge in customer retention and new business acquisition.

Actionable strategic recommendations for suppliers and buyers to strengthen supply resilience, accelerate safer grade adoption, and commercialize sustainability while managing trade disruptions

Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged strategy that balances short-term resilience with long-term portfolio evolution. First, prioritize a tiered supply architecture that combines regional production, distributor partnerships, and contingency import corridors to minimize exposure to tariff-driven volatility and logistics disruption. Establish clear contractual terms that allow for flexibility in origin and delivery timing, and develop inventory buffering protocols aligned with critical production processes.

Second, accelerate the development and commercialization of lower-aromatic and dearomatized grades while maintaining options for high-aromatic products where performance cannot be compromised. Invest in application-focused testing and collaborative trials with key customers to validate performance equivalency and to de-risk reformulation projects. This approach will reduce friction in adoption and support claims of improved occupational safety and lower odor profiles.

Third, enhance the value proposition of distribution partners through expanded technical services, regulatory support, and digital enablement. Equip channel teams with product stewardship documentation, solvent recovery recommendations, and rapid-response logistics plans. Concurrently, explore ecommerce channels for specialty orders and small-batch customers to capture incremental demand without disrupting bulk distribution systems.

Fourth, integrate sustainability and circularity initiatives into commercial narratives by investing in solvent recovery technologies, emissions reduction projects, and transparent reporting. These initiatives not only mitigate regulatory risk but also appeal to procurement organizations prioritizing supplier environmental performance. Finally, adopt scenario-based planning that models tariff shifts, supply interruptions, and regulatory tightening, enabling leadership teams to execute pre-defined mitigation steps as conditions evolve.

An overview of the mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical assessments, regulatory review, and supply chain mapping to ensure robust analysis

The research underpinning this summary synthesizes primary interviews with industry stakeholders, technical literature on solvent performance, regulatory reviews, and supply chain analysis to ensure balanced perspectives across commercial and technical disciplines. Primary engagement included structured interviews with manufacturers, distributors, formulators, and end users to capture firsthand insights on grade selection, procurement priorities, and operational constraints. These discussions were complemented by technical assessments that evaluated solvent properties, compatibility with resin systems, and occupational safety indicators.

Secondary analysis incorporated regulatory documents, trade policy announcements, and logistics intelligence to map tariff impacts and cross-border flow adjustments. Supply chain mapping used shipping route data, refinery footprints, and distributor networks to identify potential chokepoints and near-shore opportunities. Where appropriate, scenario analysis was employed to examine combinations of tariff shifts, regulatory tightening, and demand perturbations; the scenarios were designed to be illustrative rather than predictive and to support robust planning.

Data validation involved cross-referencing interview findings with public regulatory texts and industry best practices. Care was taken to avoid reliance on single-source assertions, and triangulation methods were used to reconcile conflicting inputs. The resulting methodology balances qualitative insight with technical evaluation to provide a pragmatic, actionable view of the white spirit landscape that supports commercial decision-making and operational planning.

A concise closing synthesis highlighting the critical interplay of product differentiation, regulatory compliance, and supply resilience for future competitive positioning

In conclusion, white spirit occupies a pivotal role across coatings, degreasing, and cleaning applications, yet the product family is being reshaped by regulatory pressures, shifting end-use preferences, and trade dynamics. Stakeholders that proactively adopt differentiated grade strategies, strengthen distributor and logistics capabilities, and invest in solvent recovery and reformulation will be best positioned to navigate the evolving landscape. Equally important, procurement teams must incorporate tariff and trade scenario planning into sourcing strategies to preserve supply continuity and control total cost exposure.

Looking forward, success will hinge on integrating technical excellence with commercial agility: suppliers should offer a clear grade roadmap and deliver robust technical support, while buyers should seek transparent supplier commitments on compliance and continuity. Collaboration between producers, distributors, and formulators will accelerate adoption of lower-aromatic and dearomatized products where appropriate, and will enable practical steps toward safer, lower-odor formulations without sacrificing essential performance.

This executive synthesis is intended to support leadership deliberations, guide targeted follow-on analyses, and inform procurement and R&D prioritization. For teams requiring deeper exploration-such as custom segment analysis, supplier risk scoring, or extended regional deep dives-the full report and supplementary materials provide the granularity necessary for operationalization.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Growing demand for low-VOC and bio-based white spirit formulations in eco-conscious industrial cleaning
  • 5.2. Shift toward closed-loop solvent recycling systems to reduce white spirit waste and regulatory pressure
  • 5.3. Integration of advanced odorless white spirit grades in consumer paint thinners for enhanced user safety
  • 5.4. Expansion of white spirit demand in emerging Asia-Pacific markets driven by low-cost construction activities
  • 5.5. Impact of tightening VOC emission standards on global white spirit production and formulation strategies
  • 5.6. Adoption of digital monitoring and IoT-enabled quality control in industrial white spirit manufacturing facilities

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. White Spirit Market, by Grade

  • 8.1. Dearomatized
  • 8.2. High Aromatic
  • 8.3. Low Aromatic

9. White Spirit Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 9.1. Distributors
  • 9.2. Ecommerce
  • 9.3. Retail

10. White Spirit Market, by Application

  • 10.1. Cleaning Agents
    • 10.1.1. Household Cleaning
    • 10.1.2. Industrial Cleaning
  • 10.2. Degreasing Agents
    • 10.2.1. Engine Degreasing
    • 10.2.2. Metal Degreasing
  • 10.3. Paint Thinner
    • 10.3.1. Architectural Paints
    • 10.3.2. Automotive Paints
    • 10.3.3. Industrial Coatings

11. White Spirit Market, by End Use Industry

  • 11.1. Automotive
  • 11.2. Construction
  • 11.3. Furniture
  • 11.4. Marine

12. White Spirit Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. White Spirit Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. White Spirit Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 15.3.1. Exxon Mobil Corporation
    • 15.3.2. Royal Dutch Shell plc
    • 15.3.3. TotalEnergies SE
    • 15.3.4. China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation
    • 15.3.5. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
    • 15.3.6. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC
    • 15.3.7. PetroChina Company Limited
    • 15.3.8. BP p.l.c.
    • 15.3.9. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
    • 15.3.10. PT Pertamina (Persero)
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제