시장보고서
상품코드
1853796

일회용 마스크 시장 : 유형, 소재, 유통 채널, 최종 용도별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

Disposable Masks Market by Type, Material, Distribution Channel, End-Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 188 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

일회용 마스크 시장은 2032년까지 CAGR 6.34%로 88억 달러로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준연도 2024 53억 8,000만 달러
추정연도 2025 57억 달러
예측연도 2032 88억 달러
CAGR(%) 6.34%

규제 상황, 공급망, 소비자 행동의 변화 속에서 진화하는 일회용 마스크의 전망을 간결하고 명료하게 요약한 소개

일회용 마스크의 상황은 공중 보건 대비, 산업 안전 프로토콜, 소비자 위생 행동의 전략적 요소로 진화하고 있습니다. 최근 수년간 규제 변화, 제품 혁신, 유통 모델 변화로 인해 수요 역학이 재조정되면서 제조업체, 유통업체, 기관 투자자들은 조달, 품질 보증, 재고 전략을 재검토해야 하는 상황에 처해 있습니다. 이해관계자들은 현재 성능 기준, 소재에 대한 고려, 채널별 기대치 등 보다 복잡한 매트릭스에 직면해 있으며, 이에 대한 정확한 업무 대응이 요구되고 있습니다.

이러한 환경에서 명확한 보호 성능과 사용자 편의성을 갖춘 제품 포트폴리오를 갖춘 기업은 헬스케어, 산업용, 개인용 부문에서 지속적인 수요를 확보할 수 있는 유리한 입지를 확보할 수 있습니다. 동시에, 조달팀은 탄력성과 비용 및 규정 준수와 균형을 맞추어야 하며, 종종 지역마다 다른 요구 사항과 인증 제도를 잘 활용해야 합니다. 비용을 최적화하고, 진화하는 표준을 준수하며, 연속성을 유지하고자 하는 조직이라면, 즉흥적인 조달에서 전략적 공급 계획으로 전환하는 것이 필수적입니다.

소재 혁신, 추적성, 유통 역학 진화에 따른 일회용 마스크의 형태를 바꾸는 매우 중요한 변혁적 변화를 살펴봅니다.

일회용 마스크 분야는 제품 설계, 제조 우선순위, 시장 출시 전략에 영향을 미치는 변화의 시기가 도래하고 있습니다. 부직포 소재, 여과재, 인체공학적 디자인의 발전은 일회용 제품에 대한 기대치를 높이고, 인증 및 출처에 대한 감시가 강화되면서 제조업체는 투명성이 높은 품질관리 시스템을 채택하도록 장려하고 있습니다. 이러한 기술적 개선은 규제 준수와 상업적 신용을 촉진하는 디지털 추적성 및 배치 수준의 문서화로 보완됩니다.

동시에 E-Commerce 플랫폼, 가치 소매업체, 기관 조달팀이 차별화된 채널을 추구함에 따라 유통 모델도 다양해지고 있습니다. 포장과 편의성 높은 포맷의 혁신은 임상 현장 외에서의 채택을 촉진하고 일반 소비자와 비의료계 기업이 일회용 마스크를 표준 안전 조치에 포함시키도록 장려하고 있습니다. 순효과는 성능뿐만 아니라 공급의 신뢰성, 검증 가능한 품질, 보호 능력의 명확한 전달을 요구하는 시장입니다.

2025년 미국 관세 정책 변경이 조달, 공급망 복원력, 제조 발자국 결정에 미치는 누적 영향 평가

2025년에 시행된 미국의 관세 조정은 일회용 마스크의 전체 밸류체인의 조달 경제, 조달 전략, 공급업체 관계에 누적 영향을 미쳤습니다. 관세 환경은 특정 수입 투입물 및 완제품의 양륙 비용을 상승시켰고, 구매자는 공급업체 믹스를 재평가하고 공급업체 다변화를 가속화할 수밖에 없었습니다. 많은 기업이 수입 관세와 긴 운송 기간으로 인한 영향을 줄이기 위해 니어쇼어링과 지역 조달 옵션을 면밀히 검토하고 있습니다.

관세는 당장의 비용에 대한 영향뿐만 아니라 제조 거점 및 재고 정책에 대한 장기적인 전략 결정에도 영향을 미치고 있습니다. 일부 제조업체는 생산 기지 조정, 자재 사용 최적화 또는 마진과 경쟁력 있는 가격을 유지하기 위한 계약 조건 재협상을 통해 대응하고 있습니다. 중요한 것은 조달팀이 단가뿐만 아니라 관세, 리드타임, 재고 유지 비용 등을 고려한 총체적 원가 분석을 중요하게 생각하게 되었습니다는 점입니다. 따라서 규제의 변화는 공급망의 구조적 변화를 촉진하고, 제품의 가용성을 유지하며, 고객의 기대에 부응하기 위해 상업적, 업무적 적응을 촉진하고 있습니다.

전략적 세분화에 대한 인사이트를 통해 제품 유형, 소재, 유통 채널, 최종 용도의 차이가 제품 전략과 조달 선택을 어떻게 형성하는지 파악할 수 있습니다.

뉘앙스가 풍부한 세분화 프레임워크를 통해 제품 유형, 소재, 유통 채널, 최종 사용 맥락이 어떻게 서로 다른 요구 사항과 시장 행동을 촉진하는지 파악할 수 있습니다. 호흡용 마스크는 FFP1, FFP2, FFP3, 수술용 마스크는 유형 i, 유형 II, 유형 IIR로 구분됩니다. 이러한 구분은 다양한 보호 수준, 인증 경로, 최종사용자의 기대치를 반영합니다. 호흡기 마스크와 수술용 마스크는 성능 테스트 및 인증의 추적성을 중요시하며, 이는 시설 조달 및 임상 채택에 필수적입니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 개요

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 일회용 마스크 시장 : 유형별

  • 비외과용 마스크
  • 호흡용 마스크
    • FFP1
    • FFP2
    • FFP3
  • 서지컬 마스크
    • 유형 I
    • 유형 II
    • 유형 IIR

제9장 일회용 마스크 시장 : 소재별

  • 코튼
  • 부직포
  • 폴리에스테르

제10장 일회용 마스크 시장 : 유통 채널별

  • 오프라인
    • 편의점
    • 약국
    • 슈퍼마켓
  • 온라인

제11장 일회용 마스크 시장 : 최종 용도별

  • 헬스케어
  • 산업
  • 개인적

제12장 일회용 마스크 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제13장 일회용 마스크 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제14장 일회용 마스크 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제15장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁사 분석
    • 3M Company
    • Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd.
    • Ambu A/S
    • Anhui Yongjia Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
    • Besco Medical Limited
    • Cardinal Health, Inc.
    • Dragerwerk AG & Co. KGaA
    • ETEX Healthcare Private Limited
    • Hangzhou Better Medical Device Co., Ltd.
    • Honeywell International Inc.
    • Jiangsu Teyin Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
    • KARAM Safety Pvt. Ltd
    • Kimberly-Clark Corporation
    • Koken Medical Co., Ltd.
    • Kwalitex Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.
    • Magnum Health And Safety Pvt. Ltd.
    • Makrite Industries Co., Ltd.
    • Medi Safe International
    • Medicom Group
    • Medline Industries, Inc.
    • Moldex-Metric Inc.
    • SAS Safety Corporation
    • Shandong Qunxing Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.
    • Shanghai Jianpu Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.
    • Uvex Group
KSA 25.11.05

The Disposable Masks Market is projected to grow by USD 8.80 billion at a CAGR of 6.34% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 5.38 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 5.70 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 8.80 billion
CAGR (%) 6.34%

A clear and concise introduction summarizing the evolving disposable masks landscape amid regulatory, supply chain, and consumer behavior changes

The disposable masks landscape has evolved into a strategic component of public health preparedness, industrial safety protocols, and consumer hygiene behavior. Recent years have seen a recalibration of demand dynamics driven by regulatory changes, product innovation, and shifting distribution models, prompting manufacturers, distributors, and institutional buyers to rethink sourcing, quality assurance, and inventory strategies. Stakeholders now face a more complex matrix of performance standards, material considerations, and channel-specific expectations that require a precise operational response.

In this environment, companies that align product portfolios with clear protective performance and user comfort are better positioned to capture sustained demand across healthcare, industrial, and personal use segments. Simultaneously, procurement teams must balance resilience with cost and compliance, often navigating divergent regional requirements and certification regimes. Transitioning from ad hoc procurement to strategic supply planning will be essential for organizations aiming to maintain continuity while optimizing costs and ensuring adherence to evolving standards.

Examining the pivotal transformative shifts reshaping disposable masks with material innovation, traceability, and evolving distribution dynamics

The disposable masks sector is undergoing transformative shifts that affect product design, manufacturing priorities, and go-to-market strategies. Advances in non-woven materials, filtration media, and ergonomic design are elevating expectations for single-use products, while heightened scrutiny on certification and provenance has pushed manufacturers to adopt more transparent quality management systems. These technical improvements are complemented by digital traceability and batch-level documentation that facilitate regulatory compliance and commercial trust.

Concurrently, distribution models are diversifying as e-commerce platforms, value retailers, and institutional procurement teams pursue differentiated channels. Innovation in packaging and convenience formats has enhanced adoption outside clinical settings, encouraging everyday consumers and non-healthcare businesses to integrate disposable masks into standard safety practices. The net effect is a market that demands not only performance but also supply reliability, verifiable quality, and clear communication of protective capabilities.

Assessing the cumulative effects of United States tariff policy changes in 2025 on sourcing, supply chain resilience, and manufacturing footprint decisions

United States tariff adjustments implemented in 2025 have had a cumulative impact on procurement economics, sourcing strategies, and supplier relationships across the disposable masks value chain. The tariff environment has increased landed costs for certain imported inputs and finished goods, compelling buyers to reassess supplier mixes and accelerate supplier diversification. For many organizations, this has translated into a closer examination of nearshoring and regional sourcing options to mitigate exposure to import duties and long transit windows.

Beyond immediate cost implications, tariffs have influenced long-term strategic decisions about manufacturing footprint and inventory policy. Some manufacturers have responded by adjusting production locations, optimizing material use, or renegotiating contract terms to preserve margin and competitive pricing. Importantly, procurement teams have placed greater emphasis on total landed cost analysis rather than unit price alone, factoring in duty, lead times, and inventory carrying costs. The regulatory shift has therefore catalyzed structural changes in supply chains, prompting both commercial and operational adaptations to maintain product availability and compliance with customer expectations.

Strategic segmentation insights revealing how type, material, distribution channel, and end-use distinctions shape product strategy and procurement choices

A nuanced segmentation framework reveals how product types, materials, distribution channels, and end-use contexts drive distinct requirements and market behavior. Based on Type, the market is studied across Non-Surgical Masks, Respiratory Masks, and Surgical Masks, with Respiratory Masks further differentiated into FFP1, FFP2, and FFP3 and Surgical Masks further categorized into Type I, Type II, and Type IIR; these distinctions reflect varied protection levels, certification pathways, and end-user expectations. The Respiratory and Surgical subcategories emphasize performance testing and certification traceability, which are critical to institutional procurement and clinical adoption, while Non-Surgical Masks prioritize wearer comfort and usability for everyday consumer use.

Based on Material, the market is studied across Cotton, Non-Woven Fabric, and Polyester, and material selection directly influences filtration performance, breathability, and environmental considerations. Non-woven fabrics remain the principal medium for medical-grade filtration, while cotton and polyester variants offer alternate trade-offs suitable for personal and low-exposure settings. Based on Distribution Channel, the market is studied across Offline and Online, with Offline further dissected into Convenience Stores, Pharmacies, and Supermarkets; channel choice affects packaging, merchandising, regulatory labeling, and order fulfillment timelines. Based on End-Use, the market is studied across Healthcare, Industrial, and Personal categories, each imposing unique certification, durability, and supply assurance requirements. Taken together, this segmentation underscores the importance of tailoring product features, compliance documentation, and go-to-market strategies to the nuanced demands of each segment and its stakeholders.

Key regional perspectives highlighting regulatory nuances, distribution patterns, and supply chain realities across major global territories

Regional dynamics continue to shape competitive strategy and regulatory compliance priorities across the disposable masks landscape. The Americas exhibit a mix of institutional purchasing power and consumer-driven demand patterns, with emphasis on certification conformity and logistics optimization. In this region, healthcare procurement practices and industrial safety regulations play a dominant role in determining acceptance criteria for products, driving suppliers to maintain robust quality systems and reliable distribution networks.

Europe, Middle East & Africa combine heterogeneous regulatory frameworks and purchasing behaviors that require suppliers to navigate multiple certification regimes and localized standards. Manufacturers engaging in these markets must adapt labeling, testing evidence, and packaging to meet varied requirements while addressing differing channel structures and price sensitivity. Asia-Pacific is characterized by a wide manufacturing base, rapid product innovation, and diverse end-user demand profiles, which together create opportunities for scale and product differentiation. Across all regions, the interplay between regulatory expectations, supply chain maturity, and channel preferences necessitates targeted regional strategies to ensure consistent compliance and market acceptance.

Corporate capability and competitive positioning analysis showing how manufacturers and distributors differentiate through quality, innovation, and supply resilience

Leading companies in the disposable masks ecosystem are demonstrating competitive differentiation through investments in quality assurance, manufacturing flexibility, and channel partnerships. Market participants that prioritize traceable supply chains, consistent certification practices, and responsive production scaling are better equipped to meet institutional buyers' stringent requirements. Strategic collaborations between manufacturers and distributors have emerged to streamline procurement, improve shelf presence, and enhance availability across key retail and institutional channels.

At the same time, firms that pursue incremental product innovation-such as enhanced filtration layers, improved breathability, or packaging optimizations-are finding traction in segments where comfort and ease of use influence repeat purchase. Operational excellence in production planning and inventory visibility has also become a competitive advantage, enabling suppliers to minimize stockouts and respond rapidly to demand spikes. Companies that balance product performance with transparent quality documentation and robust logistics capabilities are well placed to capture opportunities across healthcare, industrial, and personal use cases.

Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to align product, certification, and supply chain strategies for sustained competitive advantage

Industry leaders should commit to integrated strategies that align product development, certification, and channel execution to maintain competitive advantage. Prioritizing robust quality management systems and proactive certification documentation will reduce friction with institutional buyers and regulators, while investment in material R&D can yield meaningful differentiation in filtration performance and wearer comfort. Aligning these technical improvements with clear value propositions will help capture both professional and consumer demand.

Operationally, executives should evaluate supply chain resilience through diversified sourcing, nearshoring where feasible, and strategic inventory buffers for critical product lines. Strengthening partnerships with channel operators and enhancing digital commerce capabilities will expand reach and improve responsiveness. Finally, decision-makers should adopt outcome-focused metrics that integrate product performance, delivery reliability, and total procurement cost to guide capital allocation and commercial priorities, ensuring that investments translate into measurable business outcomes.

Transparent explanation of the structured research methodology combining primary stakeholder engagement and rigorous secondary source triangulation

This research synthesis was developed through a structured methodology drawing on primary stakeholder interviews, expert validation, and rigorous secondary source triangulation to ensure balanced perspectives. Primary engagements included procurement leads, manufacturing operations managers, and distribution partners who provided insights into certification practices, sourcing constraints, and channel behaviors. Expert validation sessions were used to test emerging themes and refine interpretation of regulatory and operational dynamics.

Secondary research encompassed regulatory guidance, standards documentation, technical literature on materials and filtration science, and public filings that shed light on corporate strategies and operational footprints. Findings were synthesized through iterative analysis to identify cross-cutting trends, regional variations, and segment-specific considerations. Quality controls included consistency checks, peer review of interpretive conclusions, and alignment with observable market behavior to ensure that the narrative reflects credible industry realities.

Concise conclusion reinforcing the imperative for quality, resilience, and strategic execution to maintain relevance in the disposable masks market

In conclusion, the disposable masks sector is transitioning from episodic demand surges to a more structured market environment where quality, supply resilience, and channel accuracy determine long-term positioning. Manufacturers and distributors that emphasize verifiable performance, regional compliance, and nimble supply chains will be best equipped to serve institutional buyers and discerning consumers. Strategic investments in materials innovation, certification infrastructure, and distribution optimization will drive differentiation and support sustained commercial relevance.

As regulatory landscapes and procurement expectations evolve, stakeholders must remain adaptive, prioritizing evidence-based product claims and operational transparency. Organizations that convert these strategic priorities into coordinated execution plans-linking R&D, quality, and logistics-will create defensible advantages that support both near-term responsiveness and durable market presence.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Integration of biodegradable materials in disposable mask production to meet eco-friendly regulations and consumer demand
  • 5.2. Development of transparent and anti-fog disposable masks for improved communication in healthcare and service industries
  • 5.3. Rising consumer preference for reusable hybrid masks combining disposable filters with washable fabric layers
  • 5.4. Implementation of nanofiber filtration technology to enhance particle capture efficiency in single-use masks
  • 5.5. Strategic collaborations between mask manufacturers and telecom companies to integrate health sensors in disposable masks
  • 5.6. Rapid expansion of online direct-to-consumer sales channels for customizable disposable masks with branding and design personalization
  • 5.7. Regulatory push for standardized certification labeling to ensure safety and efficacy across global disposable mask markets

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Disposable Masks Market, by Type

  • 8.1. Non-Surgical Masks
  • 8.2. Respiratory Masks
    • 8.2.1. FFP1
    • 8.2.2. FFP2
    • 8.2.3. FFP3
  • 8.3. Surgical Masks
    • 8.3.1. Type I
    • 8.3.2. Type II
    • 8.3.3. Type IIR

9. Disposable Masks Market, by Material

  • 9.1. Cotton
  • 9.2. Non-Woven Fabric
  • 9.3. Polyester

10. Disposable Masks Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 10.1. Offline
    • 10.1.1. Convenience Stores
    • 10.1.2. Pharmacies
    • 10.1.3. Supermarkets
  • 10.2. Online

11. Disposable Masks Market, by End-Use

  • 11.1. Healthcare
  • 11.2. Industrial
  • 11.3. Personal

12. Disposable Masks Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Disposable Masks Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Disposable Masks Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 15.3.1. 3M Company
    • 15.3.2. Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd.
    • 15.3.3. Ambu A/S
    • 15.3.4. Anhui Yongjia Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
    • 15.3.5. Besco Medical Limited
    • 15.3.6. Cardinal Health, Inc.
    • 15.3.7. Dragerwerk AG & Co. KGaA
    • 15.3.8. ETEX Healthcare Private Limited
    • 15.3.9. Hangzhou Better Medical Device Co., Ltd.
    • 15.3.10. Honeywell International Inc.
    • 15.3.11. Jiangsu Teyin Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
    • 15.3.12. KARAM Safety Pvt. Ltd
    • 15.3.13. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
    • 15.3.14. Koken Medical Co., Ltd.
    • 15.3.15. Kwalitex Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.
    • 15.3.16. Magnum Health And Safety Pvt. Ltd.
    • 15.3.17. Makrite Industries Co., Ltd.
    • 15.3.18. Medi Safe International
    • 15.3.19. Medicom Group
    • 15.3.20. Medline Industries, Inc.
    • 15.3.21. Moldex-Metric Inc.
    • 15.3.22. SAS Safety Corporation
    • 15.3.23. Shandong Qunxing Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.
    • 15.3.24. Shanghai Jianpu Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.
    • 15.3.25. Uvex Group
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제