시장보고서
상품코드
1858010

소프트 스위치 시장 : 전개 형태, 솔루션 유형, 조직 규모, 용도, 아키텍처별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

Softswitch Market by Deployment Mode, Solution Type, Organization Size, Application, Architecture - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 185 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

소프트 스위치 시장은 2032년까지 연평균 복합 성장률(CAGR) 11.02%로 370억 5,000만 달러에 이를 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 : 2024년 160억 4,000만 달러
추정 연도 : 2025년 178억 2,000만 달러
예측 연도 : 2032년 370억 5,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 11.02%

최신 통신 아키텍처 및 마이그레이션 전략에서 소프트 스위치 플랫폼의 전략적 역할을 체계화하여 명확하고 권위 있는 소개를 제공합니다.

소프트 스위치의 상황은 통신 제어, 소프트웨어 정의 네트워킹, 클라우드 네이티브 애플리케이션 아키텍처의 교차점을 차지하고 있으며, 음성 및 세션 제어가 독점 하드웨어에서 소프트웨어 중심 플랫폼으로 전환하는 방식을 형성하고 있습니다. 형성하고 있습니다. 서비스 제공업체와 기업들은 운영의 복잡성을 줄이고, 기능의 속도를 높이고, 기존 PSTN 게이트웨이와 IP 기반 네트워크를 원활하게 상호 연결하기 위해 유연한 통화 제어, 미디어 처리 및 시그널링 오케스트레이션에 대한 요구가 증가하고 있습니다. 진화하고 있습니다.

도입 패턴은 도입 선호도, 규제 프로파일, 지연 내성 등에 따라 달라지기 때문에 벤더들은 중앙 집중식 세션 제어와 분산형 미디어 처리를 통합한 하이브리드 모델을 지원합니다. 동시에 프로토콜 처리, 컨테이너화, 마이크로서비스 분야의 기술 혁신은 업그레이드 및 유지보수 주기를 변화시켜 신속한 기능 배포와 제어 플레인 기능의 세밀한 확장을 가능하게 하고 있습니다. 이러한 역학관계로 인해 소프트스위치 솔루션은 통합 커뮤니케이션을 실현하는 동시에 보다 광범위한 통합 커뮤니케이션 이니셔티브의 기반이 되는 미들웨어로 자리매김하고 있습니다.

이 경영진 요약은 최근 아키텍처 변화, 규제에 따른 역풍, 세분화에 따른 수요 신호, 지역별 경쟁 구도, 실행 가능한 권장 사항을 종합하여 리더가 정보에 입각한 조달, 제품 및 파트너십 결정을 내릴 수 있도록 돕습니다. 또한, 통찰력과 가정을 검증하기 위해 사용한 조사 방법을 설명하고, 도입, 파트너 선정, 전환 전략에 대한 실질적인 시사점을 강조합니다.

클라우드 네이티브의 진화, 엣지 배포, 상호운용성 표준 강화가 소프트 스위치 아키텍처와 벤더 선택을 재정의하는 방법

클라우드 도입, 소프트웨어 모듈화, 대기 시간을 줄이고 복원력을 향상시키는 엣지 컴퓨팅 패러다임의 등장으로 통화 제어 및 세션 관리 환경이 크게 변화하고 있습니다. 벤더들은 모놀리식 어플라이언스에서 오케스트레이션 계층 및 CI/CD 파이프라인과 통합하여 빈번한 저위험 업데이트와 신속한 기능 제공을 가능하게 하는 클라우드 네이티브 컨테이너화된 소프트스위치 구현으로 전환하고 있습니다. 이러한 변화는 조달 로직에도 변화를 가져옵니다. 조직은 이제 전통적인 성능 지표 외에도 운영의 유연성, 관측 가능성, API 에코시스템 등을 평가했습니다.

동시에 서비스 제공 업체가 규제 요건을 충족하고 통화 품질을 향상시키기 위해 미디어 처리의 현지화를 추구함에 따라 중앙 집중식 인텔리전스와 분산형 미디어 처리의 균형이 다시 우선순위를 차지하게 될 것입니다. 이러한 추세는 정책의 일관성을 유지하기 위해 컨트롤 플레인 기능을 중앙 집중화하는 한편, 미디어와 특정 시그널링 요소를 사용자 또는 에지 노드 근처에서 실행하는 하이브리드 아키텍처 패턴을 촉진합니다. 그 결과, 라우팅, 상호운용성, 페일오버 설계를 위한 토폴로지가 더욱 풍부해지며, 실제 운영에 가까운 시나리오에서 종합적인 테스트를 통해 검증해야 합니다.

상호운용성에 대한 기대도 높아지고 있으며, SIP의 변종뿐만 아니라 독자적인 시그널링 확장 및 프로그래밍 가능한 인터페이스가 존재합니다. 강력한 노스바운드 및 사우스바운드 API를 공개하고 주요 소프트 스위치의 보조 기능과 엄격한 호환성 매트릭스를 유지하는 벤더가 채택의 우위를 점하고 있습니다. 마지막으로, 시그널링 무결성에서 합법적 가로채기, 트래픽 분석에 이르기까지 보안 및 규정 준수에 대한 우려가 기능 로드맵을 형성하고, 실시간 모니터링, 이상 징후 감지 및 강화된 인증 메커니즘에 대한 투자를 촉진하고 있습니다. 이러한 변화를 종합해 볼 때, 통신사 및 기업 구매자는 벤더 선택 기준을 재검토하고, 기능적 동등성 및 규제와의 정합성을 해치지 않는 범위 내에서 전환을 계획해야 합니다.

2025년 미국 관세 변경이 소프트스위치 조달 및 벤더의 상업적 전략에 미치는 운영 및 공급망에 미치는 영향에 대한 평가

미국이 2025년에 도입한 관세 조치는 소프트스위치 공급업체와 세계 고객에게 다양한 운영 및 조달 관련 고려사항을 가져왔습니다. 이러한 조치는 특정 수입 부품 및 하드웨어 통합 시스템의 비용을 상승시킴으로써 중요한 소프트웨어 기능을 독점 하드웨어에서 분리하고 소프트웨어 전용 및 클라우드 친화적 인 제품을 강조하는 공급업체 전략을 가속화했습니다. 그 결과, 공급망의 탄력성과 집중화 리스크를 줄이기 위한 제조 및 유통 경로의 다양화에 더욱 집중하게 되었습니다.

현실적으로, 조달팀은 새로운 수입 관세 프로파일, 물류 마찰, 가상화된 소프트웨어 정의 대체품에 의한 하드웨어 모듈의 잠재적 대안을 통합하기 위해 총소유비용 프레임워크를 재검토하고 있습니다. 브랜드화된 하드웨어를 경쟁 차별화 요소로 삼았던 벤더들은 상업적 유연성을 유지하기 위해 소프트웨어 라이선싱, 구독 모델, 매니지드 서비스로 전환하고 있습니다. 이러한 상업적 진화를 통해 클라우드 기반 및 On-Premise 하이브리드 배포를 보다 빠르게 도입할 수 있으며, 고객이 요금 변동에 노출될 가능성을 줄일 수 있습니다.

또한, 관세 환경은 도입 지역과 파트너 생태계에도 영향을 미치고 있습니다. 일부 구매자는 지역 OEM으로부터 부품을 조달하거나 제한된 공급 라인에 대한 의존도를 최소화하기 위해 오픈소스 호환 스택을 선택하기도 합니다. 또한, 관세 관련 영향을 공급업체와 공유하거나 더 긴 가격 잠금을 보장하기 위해 계약 조항을 협상하는 기업도 있습니다. 전략적인 관점에서 볼 때, 관세 주도의 소프트웨어 중심 솔루션이 추진됨에 따라 서비스 연속성을 해치지 않고 규제 및 무역 조건의 변화에 적응할 수 있는 모듈식 아키텍처, API 중심의 통합, 벤더 중립적인 오케스트레이션 레이어의 사례가 강화되고 있습니다. 강화되고 있습니다.

도입 형태, 솔루션 유형, 조직 프로파일, 용도 수요, 아키텍처 트레이드오프 매핑, 세분화를 기반으로 한 종합적인 통찰력 제공

수요 패턴을 이해하려면 도입 선호도, 솔루션 유형, 조직 프로파일, 용도 이용 사례, 아키텍처 접근 방식에 대한 미묘한 견해가 필요합니다. 클라우드 기반 옵션은 프라이빗 클라우드 모델과 퍼블릭 클라우드 모델로 구분됩니다. 클라우드 기반 선택은 프라이빗 클라우드와 퍼블릭 클라우드 모델로 구분됩니다. 프라이빗 클라우드 도입에는 호스팅형 프라이빗 클라우드와 On-Premise형 프라이빗 클라우드가 있으며, 퍼블릭 클라우드에는 서비스형 인프라와 서비스형 플랫폼이 있습니다. On-Premise 선택은 영구 라이선스 구조와 구독 라이선스 모델로 구분되며, 각각 업그레이드와 유지보수에 대한 의미가 다릅니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 소프트 스위치 시장 : 전개 모드별

  • 클라우드 기반
    • 프라이빗 클라우드
      • 호스트형 프라이빗 클라우드
      • On-Premise 프라이빗 클라우드
    • 퍼블릭 클라우드
      • IaaS
      • PaaS
  • On-Premise
    • 영구 라이선스
    • 구독 라이선스

제9장 소프트 스위치 시장 : 솔루션 유형별

  • 하드웨어 일체형
    • 브랜드
    • OEM
  • 소프트웨어
    • 오픈소스
      • 상용 지원
      • 커뮤니티 지원
    • 독점
      • 라이선싱
      • 구독

제10장 소프트 스위치 시장 : 조직 규모별

  • 기업
    • 대기업
    • 중소기업
  • 서비스 제공업체
    • 세계 서비스 제공업체
    • 지역 서비스 제공업체
  • 통신사업자
    • Tier 1 사업자
    • Tier 2 사업자

제11장 소프트 스위치 시장 : 용도별

  • 모바일 VoIP
    • 3G
    • 4G 5G
  • 통합 커뮤니케이션(UC)
    • 음성 회의
    • 비디오 회의
  • VoIP
    • 비즈니스 VoIP
    • 주택 VoIP

제12장 소프트 스위치 시장 : 아키텍처별

  • 집중형
    • 클러스터
    • 싱글 노드
  • 분산형
    • 코어
    • 엣지

제13장 소프트 스위치 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제14장 소프트 스위치 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제15장 소프트 스위치 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제16장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
    • ZTE Corporation
    • Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
    • Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • Oracle Corporation
    • Ribbon Communications Inc.
    • AudioCodes Ltd.
    • Metaswitch Networks Limited
    • NEC Corporation
    • Ciena Corporation
LSH 25.11.12

The Softswitch Market is projected to grow by USD 37.05 billion at a CAGR of 11.02% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 16.04 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 17.82 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 37.05 billion
CAGR (%) 11.02%

A clear and authoritative introduction framing the strategic role of softswitch platforms in modern communications architectures and migration strategies

The softswitch landscape occupies the intersection of telecommunications control, software-defined networking, and cloud-native application architecture, shaping how voice and session control migrate from proprietary hardware into software-driven platforms. Demand for flexible call control, media handling and signaling orchestration is evolving as service providers and enterprises seek lower operational complexity, improved feature velocity, and seamless interconnectivity across legacy PSTN gateways and IP-based networks.

Adoption patterns vary by deployment preference, regulatory profile, and latency tolerance, prompting vendors to support hybrid models that blend centralized session control with distributed media processing. At the same time, innovation in protocol handling, containerization and microservices is transforming upgrade and maintenance cycles, enabling rapid feature rollouts and more granular scaling of control plane functions. These dynamics position softswitch solutions as both enablers of converged communications and as foundational middleware for broader unified communications initiatives.

This executive summary synthesizes recent architectural shifts, regulatory headwinds, segmentation-driven demand signals, regional competitive contours and actionable recommendations to help leaders make informed procurement, product and partnership decisions. The narrative emphasizes practical implications for deployment, partner selection and migration strategies while outlining methodological approaches used to validate insights and assumptions.

How cloud-native evolution, edge distribution, and heightened interoperability standards are redefining softswitch architectures and vendor selection

The landscape for call control and session management is undergoing transformative shifts driven by cloud adoption, software modularity and the emergence of edge compute paradigms that reduce latency and improve resiliency. Vendors are moving from monolithic appliances toward cloud-native, containerized softswitch implementations that integrate with orchestration layers and CI/CD pipelines, enabling frequent, low-risk updates and faster feature delivery. This shift also changes procurement logic: organizations now evaluate operational flexibility, observability and API ecosystems alongside classical performance metrics.

Concurrently, the balance between centralized intelligence and distributed media handling is reprioritized as service providers seek to localize media processing to meet regulatory requirements and enhance call quality. This trend catalyzes hybrid architectural patterns where control plane functions remain centralized for policy consistency while media and certain signaling elements execute closer to users or edge nodes. The result is a richer topology for routing, interoperability and failover designs that must be validated through comprehensive testing in production-like scenarios.

Interoperability expectations are rising as well, not only across SIP variants but across proprietary signaling extensions and programmable interfaces. Vendors that expose robust northbound and southbound APIs, and that maintain rigorous compatibility matrices with major softswitch adjuncts, gain adoption advantage. Finally, security and compliance concerns-ranging from signaling integrity to lawful intercept and traffic analytics-are shaping feature roadmaps, driving investments in real-time monitoring, anomaly detection and hardened authentication mechanisms. Taken together, these shifts require operators and enterprise buyers to reassess vendor selection criteria and to plan migrations that de-risk feature parity and regulatory alignment.

Assessing the operational and supply chain implications of United States tariff changes in 2025 on softswitch sourcing and vendor commercial strategies

Tariff measures introduced by the United States in 2025 have introduced a spectrum of operational and sourcing considerations for softswitch vendors and their global customers. By increasing the cost of certain imported components and hardware-integrated systems, these measures have accelerated vendor strategies to decouple critical software capabilities from proprietary hardware and to emphasize software-only, cloud-friendly offerings. This in turn has intensified focus on supply chain resilience and on diversifying manufacturing and distribution pathways to mitigate concentration risk.

In practical terms, procurement teams are revisiting total cost of ownership frameworks to incorporate new import duty profiles, logistics friction and potential substitution of hardware modules with virtualized, software-defined alternatives. Vendors that had previously relied on branded hardware as a competitive differentiator are pivoting toward software licensing, subscription models and managed services to preserve commercial flexibility. Such commercial evolution reduces customer exposure to tariff volatility while enabling faster adoption of cloud-based and on-premises hybrid deployments.

Furthermore, the tariff environment is influencing deployment geographies and partner ecosystems. Some buyers are electing to source components from regional OEMs or to favor open source compatible stacks that minimize dependence on restricted supply lines. Others are negotiating contract clauses to share tariff-related impacts with suppliers or to secure longer price locks. From a strategic viewpoint, the tariff-driven push toward software-centric solutions strengthens the case for modular architectures, API-centric integrations and vendor-neutral orchestration layers that can adapt to shifting regulatory and trade conditions without compromising service continuity.

Comprehensive segmentation-driven insights that map deployment modes, solution types, organization profiles, application demands, and architectural trade-offs

Understanding demand patterns requires a nuanced view of deployment preferences, solution typologies, organization profiles, application use cases and architectural approaches. Based on deployment mode, buyers choose between cloud-based and on-premises solutions, with cloud-based options further differentiated between private cloud and public cloud models. Private cloud deployments can be hosted private cloud arrangements or on-prem private cloud implementations, while public cloud choices often map to infrastructure-as-a-service and platform-as-a-service variants. On-premises alternatives are distinguished by perpetual license structures and subscription license models, each carrying different upgrade and maintenance implications.

Based on solution type, the softswitch market divides into hardware-integrated offerings and software-only solutions. Hardware-integrated pathways include branded and OEM systems that bundle physical appliances with control software, while software-only approaches split between open source and proprietary implementations. Open source softswitches may be commercially supported or community supported, offering different assurance levels for production use, whereas proprietary software commonly adopts licensed or subscription licensing frameworks that shape long-term vendor-customer relationships.

Based on organization size, requirements diverge among enterprise buyers, service providers and telecom operators. Enterprises break down into large enterprise and small-to-medium business needs, each emphasizing different economics and integration complexity. Service providers differentiate between global service providers and regional service providers, informing scale, interoperability and route diversity requirements. Telecom operators range from tier-1 operators with broad national footprints to tier-2 operators with more focused regional coverage and specific regulatory constraints.

Based on application, softswitch implementations are tailored to mobile VoIP, unified communications and VoIP-centric use cases. Mobile VoIP considerations include support for 3G, 4G and 5G signaling and mobility patterns, while unified communications demands robust audio conferencing and video conferencing capabilities integrated with presence and collaboration tools. VoIP-focused deployments often segment into business VoIP and residential VoIP featuresets, reflecting differing quality-of-service, scalability and billing needs.

Based on architecture, designs split between centralized and distributed approaches. Centralized architectures may rely on clustered or single-node configurations for control plane functions, whereas distributed architectures delineate core and edge processing responsibilities. Each architectural choice carries trade-offs in latency, fault isolation and operational complexity, and buyers must align these trade-offs with service-level objectives, geographic distribution of users and regulatory constraints. By mapping procurement choices to these segmentation axes, decision-makers can more precisely weigh vendor roadmaps, integration timelines and lifecycle support commitments.

How regional regulatory frameworks, data residency needs, and operator preferences shape deployment choices across key global markets

Regional dynamics shape vendor strategies, deployment models and go-to-market approaches across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, buyer emphasis centers on cloud migration velocity, interoperability with large PSTN gateways, and integration with leading unified communications ecosystems, driving demand for feature-rich API layers and managed service options. Competitive intensity in this region favors vendors capable of demonstrating enterprise-grade security, carrier-level routing capabilities and multi-cloud certification.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory diversity and data sovereignty considerations create demand for flexible deployment modes and strong compliance feature sets. Buyers in these markets often require private cloud or on-premises options with localized data residency controls, in addition to robust lawful intercept and audit capabilities. Vendors that can provide regional support footprints or partnerships with local integrators secure an advantage when addressing operators and regulated enterprises.

Asia-Pacific presents a mix of rapid technology adoption pockets and markets with strong legacy infrastructure, leading to varied migration paths. In higher-growth urban centers, 5G-enabled mobile VoIP and edge-centric architectures gain traction, while in other markets, cost-sensitive deployments and vendor ecosystems favor modular, software-dominant solutions. Regional channel strategies that combine global interoperability with localized services, language support and partner enablement tend to outperform single-threaded sales approaches. Across all regions, latency-sensitive applications, regulatory compliance and supply chain considerations are decisive factors in deployment planning and vendor selection.

Insightful analysis of vendor differentiation, partnership strategies, and selection criteria that impact procurement and long-term operational viability

Competitive dynamics in the softswitch arena reflect a mix of established telecommunications licensors, specialized vendors, open source communities and systems integrators that deliver verticalized solutions. Leading providers differentiate through portfolio depth, support ecosystems, API richness and the ability to integrate with session border controllers, media servers and orchestration platforms. Some companies excel at enterprise-focused unified communication integrations while others maintain strong footholds among global carriers due to robust interconnect capabilities and route management features.

Vendor selection often hinges on demonstrated production deployments, depth of protocol support, roadmap transparency and professional services capabilities that ease migration. Partnerships with cloud infrastructure providers, edge platform vendors and regional integrators are common strategies to expand addressable markets and to offer managed services. Open source projects continue to influence feature sets and interoperability expectations, with commercially supported distributions offering a bridge for risk-averse buyers seeking accelerated time-to-production.

Buyers should evaluate supplier viability across several dimensions: the ability to provide long-term maintenance, a clear approach to security hardening and compliance, an active community or partner network for troubleshooting, and transparent release cadences that fit operational windows. Strategic vendor partnerships that include co-engineering arrangements, joint go-to-market incentives and shared roadmaps can reduce migration friction and create differentiated feature packages for target verticals.

Actionable, pragmatic recommendations that align migration planning, procurement safeguards, and operational observability for resilient softswitch deployments

Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic migration roadmap that prioritizes modularity, interoperability and operational observability. Begin by defining nonfunctional requirements-such as latency tolerance, availability targets and security posture-then align these constraints with deployment modes and architecture choices to avoid costly rework. Adopting a phased approach that validates interoperability with existing session border controllers and media servers reduces risk while enabling incremental feature activation.

Invest in vendor-neutral orchestration and policy layers to future-proof investments and to enable multi-vendor interoperability. This reduces lock-in and allows teams to replace or upgrade components with minimal service disruption. Embrace software-only and containerized alternatives where possible to decouple control functions from hardware procurement cycles and to improve agility in feature rollouts.

Strengthen procurement and contractual frameworks to address supply chain volatility and tariff exposure by negotiating flexible licensing terms, price protection clauses and options for regional sourcing. Integrate security and compliance verification into acceptance testing to ensure the selected platform meets regulatory and audit requirements from day one. Finally, plan for a comprehensive operational transition that includes runbooks, observability dashboards, and a joint escalation matrix with vendors to maintain service continuity and to accelerate incident resolution.

A transparent methodology combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical validation, and trade policy analysis to ensure reproducible and actionable insights

The research synthesized primary interviews with technical buyers, solution architects, and network operators, combined with secondary analysis of public technical documentation, standards bodies, and deployment case studies. Qualitative inputs prioritized validation of feature parity, integration patterns and operational challenges, while vendor-provided technical whitepapers and interoperability matrices were used to cross-check capability claims. Emphasis was placed on triangulating claims through multiple independent sources to minimize vendor bias and to surface real-world constraints.

Technical validation included reviewing interoperability test logs, release notes and security advisories, as well as analyzing architecture patterns demonstrated in production deployments. Trade and tariff analyses were informed by public policy announcements and customs documentation, with attention to how procurement teams adjust sourcing strategies in response to duties and import restrictions. Regional insights were derived from interviews with operators and systems integrators active in target geographies, supplemented by observation of regulatory trends and infrastructure modernization programs.

Limitations are acknowledged where proprietary deployments or confidential commercial arrangements restricted visibility. To mitigate this, the methodology incorporated scenario-based assessments and sensitivity checks that explore plausible operational outcomes under different procurement and architectural choices. The approach emphasizes reproducibility and traceability, documenting sources and assumptions to enable clients to adapt insights to their specific contexts.

A compelling conclusion that synthesizes strategic imperatives for modernization, risk mitigation, and vendor alignment in evolving softswitch ecosystems

The softswitch domain is at an inflection point where software modularity, cloud-native practices and geopolitical trade dynamics converge to reshape procurement, architecture and vendor economics. Organizations that proactively embrace modular, API-first designs and that plan migrations in phases will reduce risk and accelerate return on operational improvements. At the same time, attention to supply chain diversification, tariff exposure and region-specific compliance will be essential to sustaining long-term service availability and cost predictability.

Decision-makers must balance near-term operational continuity with longer-term strategic transformations by prioritizing interoperability, observability and contractual flexibility. Vendors and integrators that align roadmaps with these buyer priorities-while maintaining transparent support commitments and robust testing regimes-will capture opportunities across enterprise, service provider and operator segments. Ultimately, the path forward favors pragmatic modernization that is informed by rigorous technical validation and an adaptive commercial approach.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Cloud native softswitch deployments enabling telecom operators to scale services dynamically across virtualized infrastructures
  • 5.2. Integration of software-defined networking and network function virtualization with softswitch architectures for agile service provisioning
  • 5.3. Implementation of AI-driven call routing optimization in softswitch platforms to enhance quality of experience for end users
  • 5.4. Adoption of edge computing capabilities in softswitch solutions to reduce latency in real-time voice and messaging traffic
  • 5.5. Enhanced security frameworks in softswitch systems incorporating advanced encryption and fraud detection mechanisms
  • 5.6. Convergence of 5G network slicing with softswitch IMS functionality to support differentiated services and enterprise use cases
  • 5.7. Rise of open source softswitch platforms facilitating cost-effective deployment and rapid customization for service providers

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Softswitch Market, by Deployment Mode

  • 8.1. Cloud-Based
    • 8.1.1. Private Cloud
      • 8.1.1.1. Hosted Private Cloud
      • 8.1.1.2. On-Prem Private Cloud
    • 8.1.2. Public Cloud
      • 8.1.2.1. IaaS
      • 8.1.2.2. PaaS
  • 8.2. On-Premises
    • 8.2.1. Perpetual License
    • 8.2.2. Subscription License

9. Softswitch Market, by Solution Type

  • 9.1. Hardware-Integrated
    • 9.1.1. Branded
    • 9.1.2. OEM
  • 9.2. Software-Only
    • 9.2.1. Open Source
      • 9.2.1.1. Commercially Supported
      • 9.2.1.2. Community Supported
    • 9.2.2. Proprietary
      • 9.2.2.1. Licensed
      • 9.2.2.2. Subscription

10. Softswitch Market, by Organization Size

  • 10.1. Enterprise
    • 10.1.1. Large Enterprise
    • 10.1.2. Small Medium Business
  • 10.2. Service Provider
    • 10.2.1. Global Service Provider
    • 10.2.2. Regional Service Provider
  • 10.3. Telecom Operator
    • 10.3.1. Tier-1 Operator
    • 10.3.2. Tier-2 Operator

11. Softswitch Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Mobile VoIP
    • 11.1.1. 3G
    • 11.1.2. 4G 5G
  • 11.2. Unified Communications
    • 11.2.1. Audio Conferencing
    • 11.2.2. Video Conferencing
  • 11.3. VoIP
    • 11.3.1. Business VoIP
    • 11.3.2. Residential VoIP

12. Softswitch Market, by Architecture

  • 12.1. Centralized
    • 12.1.1. Cluster
    • 12.1.2. Single Node
  • 12.2. Distributed
    • 12.2.1. Core
    • 12.2.2. Edge

13. Softswitch Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Softswitch Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Softswitch Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
    • 16.3.2. ZTE Corporation
    • 16.3.3. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
    • 16.3.4. Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • 16.3.5. Oracle Corporation
    • 16.3.6. Ribbon Communications Inc.
    • 16.3.7. AudioCodes Ltd.
    • 16.3.8. Metaswitch Networks Limited
    • 16.3.9. NEC Corporation
    • 16.3.10. Ciena Corporation
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제