시장보고서
상품코드
1870171

컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 용도별, 최종 이용 산업별, 기술별, 종류별, 형태별, 프로세스별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

Color Resist Material Market by Application, End Use Industry, Technology, Type, Form, Process - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 187 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

컬러 레지스트 재료 시장은 2032년까지 CAGR 5.91%로 17억 1,000만 달러 규모로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 2024년 10억 8,000만 달러
추정 연도 2025년 11억 4,000만 달러
예측 연도 2032 17억 1,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 5.91%

의사결정권자를 위한 컬러 레지스트 소재 생태계를 정의하는 기술적 차별화 요소, 공급망 동향, 전략적 우선순위에 초점을 맞춘 분석

컬러 레지스트 재료의 동향은 첨단 전자제품, 디스플레이 제조, 인쇄회로기판 생산, 반도체 제조에서 매우 중요한 역할을 담당하고 있습니다. 본 Executive Summary는 제조업체, 공급업체, 최종사용자의 전략적 의사결정을 형성하는 주요 기술 차별화 요소, 공급망 동향, 이해관계자의 우선순위를 정리하고 있습니다. 다학제적 지식을 통합하여 재료과학, 공정 통합, 규제 압력이 어떻게 상호 작용하여 제품 선택과 혁신 로드맵에 영향을 미치는지 밝힙니다.

리소그래피 기술의 발전, 지속가능성에 대한 요구, 공급망 재편이 컬러 레지스트 소재의 개발 경로와 상업화 전략을 어떻게 공동으로 변화시키고 있는가?

컬러 레지스트 재료 분야는 리소그래피 기술의 발전, 디스플레이 구조, 전자 패키징 방법의 혁신에 힘입어 일련의 혁신적인 변화를 경험하고 있습니다. 생산이 고해상도 디스플레이와 고밀도 집적회로 기판으로 전환됨에 따라, 재료는 점점 더 엄격해지는 패턴 공차와 대규모 제조 가능성을 동시에 충족시켜야 합니다. 이와 병행하여 반도체 분야에서는 새로운 레지스트 화학적 조성 및 공정 제어를 필요로 하는 노광 기술이 진화하여 개발 일정과 공급업체의 전문화를 변화시키고 있습니다.

2025년 미국의 관세 조치가 조달, 공급망 전략 및 상업적 협상에 미치는 영향

2025년 미국이 도입한 관세 조치는 디스플레이, 인쇄회로기판, 반도체 분야에서 사용되는 재료의 세계 조달 및 가격 형성에 새로운 복잡성을 더했습니다. 이러한 관세는 특수 수지 및 감광성 화합물의 직접 수입뿐만 아니라 다운스트림 완제품 부품에도 영향을 미치고, 제조업체는 국제 공급업체와의 조달처 선정, 재고 관리, 계약조건을 재검토해야 하는 상황에 처해 있습니다. 이에 따라 일부 기업들은 대체 공급업체 인증을 앞당기거나 생산의 더 큰 비율을 국내 또는 관세 면제 지역으로 이전하고 있습니다.

애플리케이션 요구, 기술 선택, 공정 경로, 최종 용도 우선순위를 전략적 제품 및 상업적 결정에 연결하는 실용적인 세분화에 대한 인사이트를 제공합니다.

세분화에 기반한 인사이트는 전체 컬러 레지스트 소재 환경에서 제품 개발 및 상업 전략을 최종사용자의 요구 사항에 맞게 조정하는 데 핵심적인 역할을 합니다. 용도별로는 평판 디스플레이, 인쇄회로기판, 반도체 분야로 시장을 분류하여 조사하고 있습니다. 평판 디스플레이 분야는 액정용 레지스트와 유기EL용 레지스트, 인쇄기판 분야는 건식 필름 레지스트와 액상 레지스트, 반도체 분야는 DUV 포토레지스트, EUV 포토레지스트, I-Line 포토레지스트로 세분화하여 분석하고 있습니다. 이러한 다층적 관점은 디스플레이 패널 제조업체가 광학 투명성, 장기 안정성 및 패턴 충실도를 우선시하는 반면, PCB 제조업체는 평탄화 및 에칭 저항을 중시하고 반도체 팹은 극히 낮은 결함률과 파장별 감광성을 요구하는 경향을 강조합니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 용도별

  • 플랫 패널 디스플레이
    • 액정 디스플레이용 레지스트
    • OLED용 레지스트
  • 인쇄회로기판
    • 드라이 필름 레지스트
    • 액체 레지스트
  • 반도체
    • DUV 포토레지스트
    • EUV 포토레지스트
    • I선 포토레지스트

제9장 컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 최종 이용 산업별

  • 자동차
  • 일렉트로닉스
    • 가전제품
    • 산업용 전자기기
    • 군·항공우주
  • 인프라
  • 포장

제10장 컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 기술별

  • 염료 레지스트
  • 올리고머 레지스트
    • 아크릴레이트
    • 에폭시 수지
  • 안료 레지스트

제11장 컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 유형별

  • 에칭 레지스트
    • 금속 레지스트
    • 폴리머 레지스트
  • 포토레지스트
    • 네거티브 조
    • 포지티브조
  • 솔더 마스크
    • 드라이 필름
    • 액체

제12장 컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 형태별

  • 필름
  • 액체
    • 용제형
    • 수성
  • 분말

제13장 컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 프로세스별

  • 잉크젯 인쇄
  • 스크린 인쇄
  • 스핀 코팅
    • 배치
    • 싱글 웨이퍼

제14장 컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제15장 컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제16장 컬러 레지스트 재료 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제17장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • JSR Corporation
    • Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.
    • DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
    • Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
    • Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
    • Merck KGaA
    • Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
    • Dow Inc.
    • Showa Denko K.K.
    • AGC Inc.
KSM 25.12.01

The Color Resist Material Market is projected to grow by USD 1.71 billion at a CAGR of 5.91% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 1.08 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 1.14 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 1.71 billion
CAGR (%) 5.91%

A focused orientation to technical differentiators, supply chain dynamics, and strategic priorities that define the color resist materials ecosystem for decision-makers

The color resist materials landscape occupies a pivotal role across advanced electronics, display manufacturing, printed circuit board production, and semiconductor fabrication. This executive summary frames critical technical differentiators, supply chain dynamics, and stakeholder priorities that shape strategic decisions for manufacturers, suppliers, and end users. By synthesizing cross-disciplinary insights, it illuminates how materials science, process integration, and regulatory pressures coalesce to influence product selection and innovation roadmaps.

Throughout this report, readers will find an integrated account of application-specific requirements, technology pathways, and commercial drivers that inform procurement and development strategies. The intent is to equip senior leaders with a concise, actionable perspective that bridges laboratory advances and production realities, thereby enabling informed investment and partnership decisions. Transitional analysis links upstream raw material considerations with downstream assembly and reliability outcomes, highlighting where technical trade-offs and competitive advantages most often emerge.

Ultimately, the introduction establishes the analytical lens used across the research, clarifying scope, key terminology, and the interplay between performance attributes and manufacturing constraints. It sets expectations for how subsequent sections translate technical complexity into practical recommendations for product development, supplier engagement, and operational resilience across the color resist materials ecosystem.

How advances in lithography, sustainability mandates, and supply chain realignment are jointly transforming development pathways and commercialization strategies in color resist materials

The color resist materials sector is experiencing a series of transformative shifts driven by advances in lithography, display architectures, and electronic packaging methodologies. As production moves toward higher-resolution displays and more densely integrated circuit boards, materials must reconcile increasingly stringent patterning tolerances with manufacturability at scale. Parallel to this, the semiconductor segment is advancing exposure technologies that require novel resist chemistries and process controls, altering development timelines and supplier specialization.

Process modernization is proceeding hand in hand with sustainability expectations. Manufacturers face growing pressure to adopt lower-solvent formulations and water-based processing where feasible, while maintaining reliability metrics critical for automotive and aerospace end uses. The interplay between environmental regulation and customer demand is accelerating reformulation efforts, driving partnerships between specialty chemical firms and fab and panel manufacturers to co-develop pragmatic, compliant solutions.

Supply chain resilience has become a competitive imperative. Volatility in precursor chemicals and capacity constraints for advanced photoresists have prompted portfolio diversification and localized sourcing strategies. This redistribution is catalyzing regional centers of excellence for specific resist types, with contract development and manufacturing organizations playing a larger role in bridging innovation and volume production. Taken together, these shifts are reshaping how firms allocate R&D investments, configure production assets, and structure commercial agreements to sustain differentiation in a tighter, more complex landscape.

Impacts on procurement, supply chain strategies, and commercial negotiations resulting from United States tariff measures implemented in 2025

Recent tariff measures enacted by the United States in 2025 introduced an added layer of complexity to global procurement and pricing dynamics for materials used across displays, printed circuit boards, and semiconductors. These duties affect not only direct imports of specialty resins and photoactive compounds but also downstream finished components, prompting manufacturers to revisit sourcing, inventory management, and contractual terms with international suppliers. In response, some firms have accelerated qualification of alternative suppliers or shifted a greater share of production to domestic or tariff-exempt locations.

Consequently, capital allocation decisions have had to balance near-term cost pressures with the long-term benefits of secure supply. Organizations with integrated upstream capabilities or strategic long-term contracts have experienced relative insulation, while downstream assemblers dependent on single-source imports have been compelled to re-examine product roadmaps and validate substitute chemistries. Transitional procurement strategies emerged that blend dual-sourcing, increased safety stock, and collaborative development agreements to preserve product continuity without compromising performance requirements.

For R&D and commercial teams, tariff-driven adjustments have also altered competitive dynamics. Price sensitivity heightened across certain customer segments, influencing contract negotiations and accelerating interest in formulations that reduce overall bill-of-materials impact through enhanced yield or simplified processing. In aggregate, the 2025 tariff environment has underscored the importance of supply chain visibility, cross-border manufacturing flexibility, and strategic partnerships to mitigate commercial disruption and preserve margin integrity.

Actionable segmentation insights that map application needs, technology choices, process routes, and end-use priorities to strategic product and commercial decisions

Segmentation-driven insight is central to aligning product development and commercial strategies with end-user requirements across the color resist materials landscape. Based on Application, the market is studied across Flat Panel Display, Printed Circuit Board, and Semiconductors, with the Flat Panel Display further examined across LCD Resist and OLED Resist, the Printed Circuit Board further examined across Dry Film Resist and Liquid Resist, and the Semiconductors further examined across DUV Photoresist, EUV Photoresist, and I-Line Photoresist; this layered view highlights how display panel manufacturers prioritize optical clarity, long-term stability, and pattern fidelity, while PCB fabricators emphasize planarization and etch resistance, and semiconductor fabs demand extremely low defectivity and wavelength-specific photosensitivity.

Based on End Use Industry, the market is studied across Automotive, Electronics, Infrastructure, and Packaging, with the Electronics segment further studied across Consumer Electronics, Industrial Electronics, and Military & Aerospace; this classification clarifies that automotive and aerospace applications place premium value on thermal cycling performance and traceability, consumer electronics drive cost and miniaturization imperatives, and industrial segments emphasize robustness in harsh operating environments.

Based on Technology, the market is studied across Dye Resist, Oligomer Resist, and Pigment Resist, with the Oligomer Resist further studied across Acrylate and Epoxy; these technological distinctions influence formulation complexity, cure kinetics, and adhesion profiles, thereby directing where process optimization and supplier expertise will most impact yield and functional performance. Based on Type, the market is studied across Etch Resist, Photoresist, and Solder Mask, with the Etch Resist further studied across Metal Resist and Polymer Resist, the Photoresist further studied across Negative Tone and Positive Tone, and the Solder Mask further studied across Dry Film and Liquid; this taxonomy assists teams in mapping material properties to end-process constraints such as etch selectivity, exposure latitude, and solderability.

Based on Form, the market is studied across Film, Liquid, and Powder, with the Liquid further studied across Solvent Based and Water Based; form factor choices affect handling, storage, and environmental control requirements on the production floor. Based on Process, the market is studied across Inkjet Printing, Screen Printing, and Spin Coating, with the Spin Coating further studied across Batch and Single-Wafer; process segmentation ties directly to capital equipment decisions, throughput planning, and cleanroom class needs. Taken together, these layered segmentation lenses enable clearer prioritization of portfolio investments, targeted qualification plans, and tailored go-to-market approaches for each customer cohort.

How distinct regional manufacturing strengths, regulatory regimes, and supply chain structures shape commercialization and resilience strategies across global markets

Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on supply chains, regulatory compliance, and partnership models across the color resist materials value chain. In the Americas, priority considerations include proximity to leading electronics assembly clusters, emphasis on sustainability reporting, and a growing preference for supplier transparency; these drivers shape procurement policies and support investments in local production capacity to lower geopolitical exposure and logistical lead times. Meanwhile, in Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks and environmental standards exert strong influence over material selection and processing methods, prompting manufacturers to prioritize low-emission formulations and robust documentation to meet stringent compliance and end-customer traceability requirements.

In the Asia-Pacific region, advanced manufacturing scale and concentrated centers of display and semiconductor production drive demand for the most technically demanding resists and process chemistries, alongside a well-established supplier ecosystem capable of rapid qualification cycles. The region's cost structures and production density also incentivize high-throughput process choices and long-term supply partnerships. Transitional investment patterns show firms balancing localized capabilities across these regions to manage risk and service lead times better, while strategic collaborations and joint ventures continue to shape where advanced formulations are commercialized and scaled.

Collectively, regional insights suggest that firms must tailor commercialization strategies by aligning manufacturing footprints, regulatory readiness, and customer support models with the unique operational and compliance demands of each geography, thereby enhancing resilience and competitive positioning in a globalized supply environment.

How technological differentiation, strategic partnerships, and service-oriented commercial models determine competitive advantage and customer retention in color resist materials

Competitive dynamics in the color resist materials domain reflect a combination of deep technical expertise, specialized synthesis capabilities, and strategic customer relationships. Key players differentiate through proprietary chemistries, vertical integration that secures feedstock access, and investments in advanced characterization and pilot-scale process equipment that reduce time to qualification. Companies that can demonstrate consistent defectivity control, precise spectral sensitivity tuning, and robust scale-up protocols tend to secure long-term partnerships with high-volume manufacturers.

Strategic collaborations between chemical formulators and OEMs or fabs are increasingly common, enabling co-development cycles that accelerate material qualification while aligning performance targets with process windows. Licensing arrangements and toll manufacturing partnerships have also gained traction as firms seek to expand capacity without committing extensive capital. Additionally, service-oriented offerings-such as on-site technical support, tailored training programs, and joint problem-solving teams-enhance stickiness with key accounts and create barriers to substitution.

The competitive landscape rewards a balanced approach that combines differentiated technology portfolios with flexible manufacturing and strong customer engagement. Firms that invest in cross-functional teams capable of addressing application-specific reliability, regulatory compliance, and cost-of-ownership concerns position themselves to capture higher-value opportunities and sustain relevance across cyclical industry shifts.

Practical and prioritized measures that suppliers and manufacturers can implement to strengthen resilience, accelerate qualification, and sustain product differentiation

Leaders in the color resist materials space should adopt a set of pragmatic, actionable moves to preserve competitive edge and operational resilience. First, prioritize dual-track supplier strategies that combine local capacity development with trusted global sources to mitigate tariff and logistics volatility while preserving technical access to advanced chemistries. Parallel investments in supplier development and qualification pipelines will shorten lead times for alternate materials and reduce single-source exposure.

Second, accelerate formulation workstreams that emphasize environmental compliance and lower solvent dependencies, as these attributes are becoming prerequisites for tier-one customers and regulatory approvals. Align R&D milestones with customer qualification timelines and provide targeted validation data demonstrating performance equivalence under representative process conditions. Third, expand collaborative engagement models with OEMs, fabs, and contract manufacturers to co-develop formulations and provide on-site integration support, thereby deepening customer relationships and reducing time to adoption.

Fourth, invest in digital traceability and materials informatics to improve yield optimization and failure analysis; these capabilities lower warranty risk and enable data-driven product roadmaps. Finally, incorporate scenario planning for tariff or geopolitical disruptions into capital allocation and inventory policies, ensuring that contingency production plans and contract clauses are in place to preserve service levels and margin integrity. Collectively, these recommendations strike a balance between immediate risk mitigation and long-term differentiation.

A rigorous mixed-methods approach combining expert interviews, technical benchmarking, and cross-validated secondary research to ensure practical and reproducible insights

This research synthesizes primary and secondary sources to produce an integrated perspective on color resist materials. Primary inputs include structured interviews with materials scientists, process engineers, procurement leaders, and R&D managers across multiple segments, complemented by site visits and technical deep dives that validated processing constraints and qualification workflows. Secondary inputs include peer-reviewed technical literature, patents, and publicly available regulatory documents that contextualize material chemistries, exposure technologies, and environmental standards.

Analytical methods combined qualitative insights with comparative process mapping, materials property benchmarking, and supplier capability assessments. Cross-validation techniques ensured that anecdotal findings were supported by independent technical documentation and, where available, reproducible test results. Careful attention was paid to the reproducibility of performance claims, the representativeness of interview samples across geographies and end-use industries, and the transparency of assumptions when extrapolating from laboratory data to production settings.

Ethical considerations and confidentiality protections guided engagement with industry participants, ensuring proprietary information was handled securely and summarized in aggregate to preserve anonymity. The methodology thus balances deep technical rigor with practical relevance, delivering insights that senior stakeholders can apply to procurement, product development, and strategic planning with confidence.

A strategic synthesis that reinforces the necessity of integrated materials, process, and supply chain strategies to translate technical advances into durable commercial advantage

In conclusion, the color resist materials landscape is at an inflection point where technical innovation, regulatory expectations, and supply chain strategy intersect to define competitive advantage. Organizations that integrate advanced formulation capabilities with robust qualification frameworks and flexible sourcing models will be better positioned to meet the diverse demands of displays, printed circuit boards, and semiconductor manufacturing. The importance of sustainability considerations and localized capacity, reinforced by recent trade and policy developments, underscores the need for holistic strategies that manage both performance and exposure concurrently.

Decision-makers should treat materials strategy as a core dimension of product and manufacturing planning, investing proactively in collaborative R&D, rigorous process characterization, and digital tools that enhance traceability and yield improvement. By aligning technical roadmaps with customer qualification cycles and regional compliance requirements, firms can translate scientific advances into durable commercial outcomes. The path forward requires disciplined execution, targeted partnerships, and an unwavering focus on delivering measurable improvements in reliability, throughput, and total cost of ownership.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Growth of eco-conscious waterborne color resist formulations for textile printing applications
  • 5.2. Integration of high-resolution photoresist technology for sub-10 nanometer semiconductor patterning
  • 5.3. Rising demand for UV-curable color resist materials in advanced printed electronics manufacturing
  • 5.4. Shift toward bio-based resist chemistries driven by regulatory pressure and sustainability goals
  • 5.5. Advancements in multi-layer resist stacking techniques for improved lithographic depth of focus
  • 5.6. Customizable resist tone mapping solutions enabling high-fidelity color reproduction in display manufacturing
  • 5.7. Emergence of nanoparticle-enhanced color resist formulations to boost print resolution and durability

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Color Resist Material Market, by Application

  • 8.1. Flat Panel Display
    • 8.1.1. LCD Resist
    • 8.1.2. OLED Resist
  • 8.2. Printed Circuit Board
    • 8.2.1. Dry Film Resist
    • 8.2.2. Liquid Resist
  • 8.3. Semiconductors
    • 8.3.1. DUV Photoresist
    • 8.3.2. EUV Photoresist
    • 8.3.3. I-Line Photoresist

9. Color Resist Material Market, by End Use Industry

  • 9.1. Automotive
  • 9.2. Electronics
    • 9.2.1. Consumer Electronics
    • 9.2.2. Industrial Electronics
    • 9.2.3. Military & Aerospace
  • 9.3. Infrastructure
  • 9.4. Packaging

10. Color Resist Material Market, by Technology

  • 10.1. Dye Resist
  • 10.2. Oligomer Resist
    • 10.2.1. Acrylate
    • 10.2.2. Epoxy
  • 10.3. Pigment Resist

11. Color Resist Material Market, by Type

  • 11.1. Etch Resist
    • 11.1.1. Metal Resist
    • 11.1.2. Polymer Resist
  • 11.2. Photoresist
    • 11.2.1. Negative Tone
    • 11.2.2. Positive Tone
  • 11.3. Solder Mask
    • 11.3.1. Dry Film
    • 11.3.2. Liquid

12. Color Resist Material Market, by Form

  • 12.1. Film
  • 12.2. Liquid
    • 12.2.1. Solvent Based
    • 12.2.2. Water Based
  • 12.3. Powder

13. Color Resist Material Market, by Process

  • 13.1. Inkjet Printing
  • 13.2. Screen Printing
  • 13.3. Spin Coating
    • 13.3.1. Batch
    • 13.3.2. Single-Wafer

14. Color Resist Material Market, by Region

  • 14.1. Americas
    • 14.1.1. North America
    • 14.1.2. Latin America
  • 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 14.2.1. Europe
    • 14.2.2. Middle East
    • 14.2.3. Africa
  • 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. Color Resist Material Market, by Group

  • 15.1. ASEAN
  • 15.2. GCC
  • 15.3. European Union
  • 15.4. BRICS
  • 15.5. G7
  • 15.6. NATO

16. Color Resist Material Market, by Country

  • 16.1. United States
  • 16.2. Canada
  • 16.3. Mexico
  • 16.4. Brazil
  • 16.5. United Kingdom
  • 16.6. Germany
  • 16.7. France
  • 16.8. Russia
  • 16.9. Italy
  • 16.10. Spain
  • 16.11. China
  • 16.12. India
  • 16.13. Japan
  • 16.14. Australia
  • 16.15. South Korea

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 17.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 17.3.1. JSR Corporation
    • 17.3.2. Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.
    • 17.3.3. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
    • 17.3.4. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
    • 17.3.5. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
    • 17.3.6. Merck KGaA
    • 17.3.7. Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
    • 17.3.8. Dow Inc.
    • 17.3.9. Showa Denko K.K.
    • 17.3.10. AGC Inc.
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제