집광형 태양광발전 시장 : 기술별, 전개 모델별, 최종사용자별, 집광 레벨별, 추적 기구별, 수광체 재료별, 출력별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

The Concentrated Photovoltaic Market is projected to grow by USD 16.26 billion at a CAGR of 13.73% by 2032.

A clear and practical orientation to concentrated photovoltaic fundamentals, deployment drivers, technical trade-offs, and strategic implications for stakeholders

Concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) systems represent a distinct pathway within the broader solar energy landscape, combining optical concentration and high-efficiency receiver technologies to convert sunlight into electricity more efficiently under specific conditions. This introduction locates CPV within evolving energy systems by defining core technical approaches, clarifying deployment archetypes, and situating the technology against shifting policy and supply-chain dynamics. Readers will find an accessible synthesis of CPV fundamentals that prepares them for deeper chapters addressing commercial viability, operational considerations, and strategic adoption scenarios.

Across diverse applications, CPV differentiates itself through optical design choices and receiver materials that affect performance under direct normal irradiance, thermal management regimes, and site-specific deployment constraints. This section emphasizes how technology maturity, integration complexity, and the interaction of environmental variables shape asset-level outcomes. By framing CPV in terms of technical levers, cost drivers, and strategic levers, the introduction sets expectations for the remainder of the executive summary while highlighting areas where project sponsors, technology developers, and policy makers must align to realize value.

How converging technology advances, procurement shifts, and coordinated supply chain strategies are reshaping the concentrated photovoltaic sector and commercial opportunity

The CPV landscape has experienced a sequence of transformative shifts driven by technological innovation, policy recalibration, and evolving supply-chain architectures. Advances in optical concentrators, improvements in receiver materials, and more sophisticated tracking mechanisms have collectively raised the performance ceiling for specific CPV applications, particularly where direct sunlight is abundant and land use efficiency is a priority. Alongside these engineering gains, developers have refined deployment models and integrated more rigorous operations and maintenance practices, reducing downtime and improving life-cycle outcomes.

Concurrently, the industry is navigating a changing policy environment and an increasingly interconnected supply chain. Incentives and procurement structures are shifting to reward high-efficiency, low-carbon solutions which can be documented across asset life cycles. These shifts have encouraged greater collaboration between cell manufacturers, optics specialists, and project developers, producing vertically coordinated value chains and more resilient sourcing strategies. Taken together, technological progress and strategic alignment are altering the calculus for where and how CPV systems can deliver differentiated returns compared with alternative photovoltaic approaches.

A detailed assessment of how US tariff actions in 2025 have altered procurement incentives, supply-chain localization decisions, and commercial risk calculus for concentrated photovoltaic projects

The cumulative impact of United States tariff measures implemented in 2025 has introduced a complex set of cost and supply-chain adjustments for CPV stakeholders, affecting sourcing strategies, component localization choices, and procurement timetables. For many organizations, tariffs have translated into an immediate reassessment of supplier portfolios and an accelerated push toward regional manufacturing solutions. Developers and integrators are recalibrating contracts and contingency plans to mitigate tariff exposure while exploring alternate component pathways and deeper vendor partnerships that prioritize supply security.

In parallel, the tariff environment has prompted technology suppliers to examine the vertical scope of their operations and to consider onshoring or nearshoring higher-value manufacturing steps, particularly for critical receiver components and precision optics. Policy-driven import constraints have also heightened the importance of traceability and compliance capabilities in procurement teams, who must now balance cost impacts against long-term strategic benefits such as reduced logistical risk and improved responsiveness to domestic project pipelines. Overall, tariffs have acted as an inflection point that accelerates supply-chain reconfiguration and strategic localization in the CPV ecosystem.

Comprehensive segmentation insight linking technology variants, deployment archetypes, end-user requirements, and component choices to practical commercial pathways and risk profiles

A nuanced segmentation framework clarifies where CPV technologies can create differentiated value across technical and commercial dimensions. When examining technology variants-Dish Stirling, Linear Fresnel, and Parabolic Trough-each optical and thermodynamic architecture establishes distinct trade-offs in concentration ratios, tracking complexity, and suitability for hybridization with thermal systems. Deployment models such as Commercial, Residential, and Utility Scale determine project scale, financing structures, and operations intensity, while end users including Commercial, Industrial, and Utilities exhibit divergent procurement cycles, reliability expectations, and contract durations.

Concentration level distinctions, notably High Concentration versus Low Concentration systems, influence receiver design choices and cooling strategies, which are further impacted by tracking mechanism selection between Dual Axis and Single Axis solutions that affect capture efficiency and balance-of-system costs. Receiver material decisions-III-V Cells, Multi Junction Cells with their Dual Junction and Triple Junction variants, and Silicon Cells-drive conversion efficiency, thermal behavior, and capital intensity. Finally, power output classes spanning Less Than Five Kilowatts, Five To Thirty Kilowatts, and More Than Thirty Kilowatts inform site selection, permitting complexity, and ownership models. Integrating these segmentation dimensions reveals specific commercial pathways and technical risk profiles, enabling stakeholders to align technology choice with operational needs and procurement preferences.

Regional analysis connecting resource quality, regulatory environments, and industrial ecosystems to concentrated photovoltaic adoption patterns across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics play a central role in CPV adoption patterns, with geographic variations in solar resource quality, regulatory frameworks, and industrial ecosystems shaping deployment trajectories. In the Americas, resource-rich corridors and active utility-scale procurement processes have encouraged experimentation with high-efficiency systems, while local industrial offtakers have shown interest in captive generation models that enhance energy resilience and reduce exposure to grid volatility. Market actors in this region are balancing opportunities to scale with the need to address permitting complexity and interconnection lead times.

Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogenous landscape where stringent decarbonization targets in parts of Europe coexist with emerging investment appetites in select Middle Eastern and African markets driven by large-scale solar potential. Policy instruments and competitive auctions have incentivized innovative project structures, and regional industrial hubs are increasingly attractive for manufacturing investments that shorten supply chains. Asia-Pacific remains a critical arena for CPV because of its large project pipelines, mature solar manufacturing base, and diverse deployment environments, ranging from dense urban commercial rooftops to expansive utility-scale arrays; regional players are pushing performance optimization while leveraging domestic supply capabilities to manage cost and lead-time pressures.

Insights into evolving corporate strategies where specialization, vertical coordination, and service-led propositions are reshaping competitive positioning within the concentrated photovoltaic ecosystem

Company strategies within the CPV ecosystem are becoming more differentiated, with technology specialists concentrating on incremental efficiency gains while systems integrators focus on lifecycle optimization and risk transfer. Strategic partnerships and selective vertical integration are evident as firms seek to secure access to advanced receiver materials, precision optics, and qualified assembly capabilities. These arrangements help reduce time-to-deployment and mitigate exposure to single-source vulnerabilities by spreading design, manufacturing, and service responsibilities across capable partners.

Investment in research and development remains a hallmark of leading organizations, particularly around receiver materials and thermal management innovations that enhance durability and performance in high-concentration settings. At the same time, service-oriented firms are expanding offerings in remote monitoring, predictive maintenance, and performance guarantees to meet growing demand from sophisticated end users. Mergers, joint ventures, and targeted licensing arrangements are increasingly used to accelerate commercialization and to bundle technology with financing and EPC expertise, thereby improving the bankability of CPV projects.

Actionable strategic moves for corporate leaders to secure supply, optimize operations, and align commercial propositions with diverse end-user risk appetites in the concentrated photovoltaic sector

Industry leaders can pursue several pragmatic strategies to capitalize on CPV advances and to manage near-term commercial risks. Prioritizing partnerships that secure access to high-performance receiver technologies and optics suppliers reduces technical procurement risk while enabling faster deployment. Concurrently, firms should evaluate the benefits of regional manufacturing or assembly to mitigate tariff exposure and to shorten lead times for critical components, thereby improving schedule certainty for project delivery.

Operationally, adopting advanced digital monitoring and predictive maintenance frameworks can materially improve uptime and extend asset life, shifting value from simple energy generation to reliable, documented performance outcomes. Business development teams should also tailor value propositions to distinct end-user segments-Commercial, Industrial, and Utilities-by aligning contractual structures with each buyer's performance requirements and risk tolerance. Finally, scenario planning that integrates policy shifts, tariff dynamics, and supplier concentration risk will help executive teams make robust capital allocation decisions and establish contingency pathways that preserve optionality.

A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, technical review, supply-chain mapping, and scenario analysis to ensure reliable and actionable insights

The research underpinning this executive summary employed a mixed-methods approach combining targeted primary interviews with industry participants and a structured secondary review of open-source technical literature, regulatory filings, and company disclosures. Primary engagements included conversations with technology developers, system integrators, component suppliers, and project owners to capture practical operational experiences, procurement strategies, and risk-mitigation practices. These firsthand insights were synthesised with documented evidence to ensure triangulation and to surface recurring themes that reflect real-world constraints and opportunities.

Analytical methods incorporated technology readiness assessments, supply-chain mapping, and qualitative scenario analysis to interrogate the implications of policy interventions and tariff measures. Wherever possible, findings were cross-validated through multiple evidence streams to strengthen reliability, and the methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions and data provenance. This layered approach provides a robust framework for interpreting current dynamics and for assessing strategic options that are responsive to evolving market, policy, and technological developments.

A concise synthesis of the opportunity and complexity inherent in concentrated photovoltaic adoption, emphasizing alignment of technology, supply chain, and user requirements

Concentrated photovoltaic technologies occupy a distinctive niche in the clean-energy ecosystem, offering high-performance potential where site conditions, policy incentives, and industrial needs align. The evolving landscape reflects both promise and complexity: technical progress and integrated value-chain strategies are unlocking new applications, while policy measures and supply-chain shifts are reshaping cost and procurement dynamics. For stakeholders contemplating engagement with CPV, the most prudent course combines selective technology adoption, proactive supply-chain strategies, and disciplined operational practices that prioritize measurable performance and risk mitigation.

Looking ahead, the trajectory for CPV will depend on continued innovation in receiver materials and optics, pragmatic responses to trade and tariff influences, and the ability of industry actors to assemble credible, bankable project propositions. Organizations that align technical choices with regional realities and end-user expectations are best positioned to convert the inherent advantages of CPV into long-term operational value and competitive differentiation.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Integration of dual-axis tracking systems to optimize daily CPV energy yield under varying sun angles
• 5.2. Development of low-cost polymer-based Fresnel lenses to reduce manufacturing expenses in CPV modules
• 5.3. Scaling production of III-V multi-junction cells to achieve record-breaking concentrated PV efficiencies
• 5.4. Adoption of hybrid CPV-thermal solutions for simultaneous electricity and heat generation in industrial facilities
• 5.5. Deployment of real-time monitoring and AI-driven maintenance for enhancing CPV plant uptime and performance
• 5.6. Advancements in heat dissipation techniques to improve reliability and lifespan of high-concentration PV cells
• 5.7. Expansion of utility-scale CPV projects in arid regions leveraging high DNI for maximum power generation potential

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by Technology

• 8.1. Dish Stirling
• 8.2. Linear Fresnel
• 8.3. Parabolic Trough

9. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by Deployment Model

• 9.1. Commercial
• 9.2. Residential
• 9.3. Utility Scale

10. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by End User

• 10.1. Commercial
• 10.2. Industrial
• 10.3. Utilities

11. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by Concentration Level

• 11.1. High Concentration
• 11.2. Low Concentration

12. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by Tracking Mechanism

• 12.1. Dual Axis
• 12.2. Single Axis

13. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by Receiver Material

• 13.1. III V Cells
• 13.2. Multi Junction Cells
  • 13.2.1. Dual Junction
  • 13.2.2. Triple Junction
• 13.3. Silicon Cells

14. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by Power Output

• 14.1. Five To 30 KW
• 14.2. Less Than 5 KW
• 14.3. More Than 30 KW

15. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by Region

• 15.1. Americas
  • 15.1.1. North America
  • 15.1.2. Latin America
• 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 15.2.1. Europe
  • 15.2.2. Middle East
  • 15.2.3. Africa
• 15.3. Asia-Pacific

16. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by Group

• 16.1. ASEAN
• 16.2. GCC
• 16.3. European Union
• 16.4. BRICS
• 16.5. G7
• 16.6. NATO

17. Concentrated Photovoltaic Market, by Country

• 17.1. United States
• 17.2. Canada
• 17.3. Mexico
• 17.4. Brazil
• 17.5. United Kingdom
• 17.6. Germany
• 17.7. France
• 17.8. Russia
• 17.9. Italy
• 17.10. Spain
• 17.11. China
• 17.12. India
• 17.13. Japan
• 17.14. Australia
• 17.15. South Korea

18. Competitive Landscape

• 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 18.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 18.3.1. Soitec SA
  • 18.3.2. Suncore Photovoltaics Technology Co., Ltd.
  • 18.3.3. AZUR SPACE Solar Power GmbH
  • 18.3.4. Semprius, Inc.
  • 18.3.5. Solar Systems Pty Ltd
  • 18.3.6. Concentrix Solar GmbH
  • 18.3.7. SolAero Technologies Corp.
  • 18.3.8. TetraSun Inc.
  • 18.3.9. RayGen Resources Ltd.