원예용 가스 센서 시장 : 센서 유형별, 대상 가스별, 연결성별, 용도별, 최종사용자별 - 세계 예측(2026-2032년)

The Horticultural Gas Sensors Market was valued at USD 332.40 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 359.47 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.49%, reaching USD 516.40 million by 2032.

A strategic introduction to why gas sensing now defines operational resilience, quality control, and sustainability across modern horticultural systems

The horticultural sector is undergoing a technological redefinition in which gas sensing has become a foundational element for quality, yield optimization, and sustainability. Advanced sensors now measure gases such as ethylene, carbon dioxide, and ammonia with greater specificity and at lower cost, while connectivity innovations enable real-time decision-making across greenhouses, indoor farms, and storage networks. As cultivation systems move from artisanal practices to data-driven operations, the ability to detect and manage gaseous microenvironments shapes crop health, post-harvest longevity, and the economics of modern production.

This report synthesizes cross-disciplinary trends spanning sensor physics, communications, agronomy, and regulatory frameworks to present an executive-level perspective that is actionable for technology adopters and solution providers. It examines how heterogenous sensing technologies-ranging from electrochemical cells to infrared analyzers-fit into different horticultural workflows, and how those choices influence integration complexity, maintenance regimes, and long-term total cost of ownership. By focusing on the interface between measurement fidelity and operational utility, the analysis underscores practical pathways to embed gas sensing as a standard control input in contemporary horticulture.

In addition, the introduction establishes the central challenges that organizations face when selecting and scaling sensing solutions: environmental variability, sensor drift, calibration logistics, and the need for interoperability with greenhouse control systems. The section frames these challenges as strategic imperatives that, when addressed, unlock measurable value in yield quality, resource efficiency, and regulatory compliance. Consequently, readers are prepared to prioritize investments that align technical capabilities with operational outcomes.

How technological convergence, connectivity, and evolving cultivation models are reshaping the role of gas sensors as central enablers of precision horticulture

The landscape of horticultural gas sensing is changing rapidly, driven by technological convergence, new agronomic practices, and evolving regulatory attention. Sensor miniaturization and advances in materials science have reduced both the cost and power footprint of sensing elements, enabling denser deployments that produce higher-resolution spatial and temporal data. Concurrently, the proliferation of wireless networks and cloud analytics converts raw measurements into actionable insights, shifting the role of sensors from isolated instruments to integral nodes within broader crop management ecosystems.

At the same time, cultivation models are diversifying; controlled environment agriculture and vertical farming are elevating the importance of microclimate control, while greenhouses are adopting hybrid approaches that blend traditional cultivation with hydroponic and vertical layers. These shifts increase demand for multi-gas monitoring platforms that can detect ethylene for ripening control, carbon dioxide for photosynthesis optimization, ammonia for fertilizer management, and oxygen for storage monitoring. As sensing becomes more central to automated feedback loops, integration with actuators, HVAC, and fertigation systems becomes a critical differentiator among solution providers.

Furthermore, industry dynamics are favoring interoperability and standards-based approaches. Open communication protocols and modular sensor platforms reduce vendor lock-in and simplify lifecycle maintenance. In parallel, the bar for data integrity and traceability is rising; customers expect validated measurement performance and audit-ready logs for quality assurance and regulatory reporting. Taken together, these transformative shifts reposition gas sensors from ancillary monitoring devices to strategic enablers of precision horticulture and resilient supply chains.

Assessment of how 2025 United States tariff adjustments are prompting supply chain realignment, sourcing flexibility, and commercial model adaptation for sensor providers

Recent trade policy developments and tariff adjustments in the United States for 2025 have introduced new operational considerations for technology procurement, supply chain planning, and product pricing within the horticultural gas sensor segment. Manufacturers and integrators who source components internationally are reassessing supplier contracts, lead-time buffers, and product design trade-offs to mitigate tariff-driven cost volatility. These shifts affect decisions such as localizing critical assembly steps, dual-sourcing key modules, and redesigning packaging and calibration workflows to reduce cross-border complexity.

Importantly, tariff dynamics interact with existing logistic and regulatory constraints. For example, higher import duties on sensor modules or related electronic components increase incentives to validate domestically produced alternatives or to perform final assembly within tariff-favorable jurisdictions. At the same time, service-oriented business models-such as sensors-as-a-service or performance-based contracts-are gaining traction because they allow providers to absorb tariff variability while preserving predictable pricing for end users. Consequently, channel strategies and contractual frameworks are adapting to spread risk across manufacturers, distributors, and service providers.

In practical terms, the cumulative impact of the tariffs in 2025 accelerates a shift toward supply chain agility and nearshoring for mission-critical sensor elements. Organizations are increasingly prioritizing vendor transparency, multi-region manufacturing footprints, and flexible procurement terms. These responses maintain continuity of sensor deployments in horticulture while balancing cost, lead time, and compliance risks introduced by evolving trade policies.

Detailed segmentation-driven insights revealing how sensor physics, gas targets, application contexts, user profiles, and connectivity determine optimal horticultural deployments

A granular segmentation lens clarifies how technology choices and application contexts influence procurement and deployment pathways across horticultural gas sensing. Based on Sensor Type, the market is studied across Catalytic Bead, Electrochemical, Infrared, Metal Oxide Semiconductor, and Photoionization, and the Metal Oxide Semiconductor category is further studied across Tin Oxide and Zinc Oxide, which differ in sensitivity profiles and baseline stability. Based on Gas Target, the market is studied across Ammonia, Carbon Dioxide, Ethylene, and Oxygen, each of which presents distinct detection challenges linked to concentration ranges, cross-sensitivity effects, and calibration frequency. Based on Application, the market is studied across Field Monitoring, Greenhouses, Indoor Farming, and Storage & Logistics, with Field Monitoring further studied across Open Field and Polytunnel, Greenhouses further studied across Hydroponic, Soil Based, and Vertical, Indoor Farming further studied across Controlled Environment Agriculture and Vertical, and Storage & Logistics further studied across Cold Storage, Transportation, and Warehouses, reflecting how environments impose different thermal, humidity, and particulate stressors on sensors. Based on End User, the market is studied across Commercial Growers, Government Agencies, Research Institutes, and Technology Providers, each stakeholder having differing procurement cycles, performance thresholds, and compliance expectations. Based on Connectivity, the market is studied across Wired and Wireless, with Wired further studied across Ethernet and Serial, and Wireless further studied across Bluetooth, LoRaWAN, and WiFi, illustrating the trade-offs between bandwidth, range, power consumption, and integration complexity.

From this segmentation, several insights emerge. Sensor Type selection must balance measurement specificity against operational constraints: electrochemical cells remain preferred for certain toxic gases due to selectivity, while infrared and photoionization provide advantages for non-contact, long-term stability measurements. Metal oxide semiconductors, whether tin oxide or zinc oxide variants, offer low-cost options for broad detection but require temperature and humidity compensation strategies to maintain reliability. Gas Target priorities drive solution architecture; for instance, ethylene control in ripening processes demands low-ppb sensitivity and rapid response, whereas carbon dioxide management focuses on maintaining ppm-level stability to optimize photosynthetic efficiency. Application context is equally determinative: open field and polytunnel deployments tolerate more intermittent connectivity and prioritize ruggedness, while controlled environment agriculture relies on high-fidelity, low-latency data streams and integration with environmental control systems. End users set procurement criteria that reflect operational scale and budget: commercial growers emphasize durability and serviceability, government agencies and research institutes prioritize traceability and calibration standards, and technology providers value modularity and API accessibility. Connectivity choices ultimately bridge device capabilities with operational requirements; LoRaWAN and other LPWAN options excel for distributed field monitoring, while WiFi and Ethernet suit greenhouse and indoor deployments where bandwidth enables richer telemetry and on-premise analytics.

Taken together, the segmentation analysis underscores that there is no one-size-fits-all sensor solution; optimal deployments are the result of aligning sensor physics, target gas requirements, environmental constraints, end-user needs, and connectivity trade-offs into a coherent systems design.

Regional dynamics and regulatory pressures across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine adoption patterns and deployment priorities

Regional dynamics influence technology adoption, deployment priorities, and commercial strategies across the horticultural gas sensing ecosystem in distinct ways. In the Americas, advanced horticultural operations in both North and South regions are concentrating on precision control to increase yield quality and reduce post-harvest losses, which drives demand for integrated sensor-to-actuator solutions and data services that support end-to-end traceability. Supply chain proximity and a strong domestic manufacturing base in certain locales enable rapid pilot-to-scale transitions, while regulatory frameworks emphasize food safety and emissions reporting, informing procurement and validation priorities.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor and sustainability mandates shape both sensor specifications and reporting requirements. Growers and distributors in this region increasingly require documented measurement integrity and certification-ready instrumentation, especially for export-oriented produce. Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas mitigation are strong drivers, prompting investments in multi-gas platforms that support carbon dioxide optimization and leak detection. Market approaches in this region also emphasize interoperability with established greenhouse management systems and adherence to regional data protection and cross-border data transfer norms.

Asia-Pacific presents a diverse tapestry of adoption patterns, where high-density urban farming and rapid expansion of controlled environment agriculture coexist with large-scale open-field production. Demand here leans toward cost-effective, scalable sensor networks that can operate in high-humidity and high-temperature environments, and there is notable interest in wireless connectivity solutions that minimize installation complexity. Additionally, local OEMs and integrators are active in adapting sensor packages to regional crop types and post-harvest logistics, accelerating adoption in both emerging and mature horticultural markets. Across regions, interoperability, service infrastructure, and regulatory alignment remain recurring themes that inform deployment strategies.

Competitive dynamics showing how specialized manufacturers, integrators, platform providers, and component suppliers capture value through validation, modularity, and services

The company landscape in horticultural gas sensing is characterized by a spectrum of players including specialized sensor manufacturers, system integrators, agritech platform companies, and component suppliers that provide enabling electronics and optics. Sensor manufacturers differentiate through detection chemistry, calibration processes, and ruggedization for horticultural environments. System integrators add value by combining sensors with environmental control systems, edge computing, and analytics to form turnkey solutions that meet grower operational requirements.

Technology providers and platform companies compete on data services, offering APIs, dashboards, and predictive analytics that translate gas readings into actionable recommendations for ventilation, CO2 dosing, and ripening control. Component suppliers-including MEMS manufacturers, optical module makers, and semiconductor foundries-play an essential role in lowering the cost and improving the reliability of sensing modules. Partnerships between these groups accelerate time-to-market and support localized service networks necessary for calibration, maintenance, and warranty support.

Across the competitive landscape, winning strategies emphasize validated measurement performance, modular hardware architectures that enable field swaps and upgrades, and clear service-level agreements that address calibration intervals and drift compensation. Firms that can demonstrate interoperability with greenhouse controllers and farm management systems tend to gain traction, as do those offering flexible commercial models that align with grower capital and operational preferences. Finally, manufacturers that invest in application-specific sensor packages-tailored to ethylene monitoring for ripening rooms or ammonia detection in fertilizer management-create compelling value propositions for targeted use cases.

Actionable strategic imperatives for companies to secure adoption and scalability by focusing on validation, modularity, flexible commercial models, and supply chain resilience

Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic, systems-oriented strategy that blends technical rigor with operational practicality to accelerate adoption and reduce deployment risk. First, prioritize validated measurement performance and transparent calibration methodologies as prerequisites for commercial engagement; this establishes trust with growers and regulators and reduces friction in procurement decisions. Second, design products with modularity in mind so that sensing elements, communication modules, and enclosures can be upgraded or swapped without replacing entire units, thereby extending lifecycle value and simplifying field maintenance.

Third, implement flexible commercial models such as sensor-as-a-service or bundled hardware-plus-analytics offerings to lower adoption barriers for growers and to enable predictable, recurring revenue streams for providers. Fourth, build multi-region supply chain resilience by qualifying dual suppliers for critical components and creating options for regional assembly, which mitigates tariff and logistics risks while maintaining lead-time responsiveness. Fifth, invest in interoperability through standard APIs and protocol support to ensure seamless integration with greenhouse management systems, HVAC controllers, and cloud analytics platforms, which increases the stickiness of deployments.

Finally, focus on outcome-driven pilots that quantify improvements in crop quality, energy efficiency, or post-harvest loss reduction. By combining rigorous field validation with clear ROI narratives, industry leaders can move stakeholders from trial to scale while simultaneously improving product-market fit and supporting long-term commercial viability.

Rigorous mixed-method research approach combining practitioner interviews, technical review, empirical sensor evaluation, and scenario analysis for robust insights

The research methodology applied to this analysis combines multi-source evidence gathering, targeted expert interviews, and empirical device evaluation to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary research included structured interviews with growers, greenhouse operators, R&D managers, and procurement leads to capture first-hand operational constraints, performance expectations, and decision criteria that influence sensor selection. These practitioner insights were triangulated with discussions held with system integrators, hardware vendors, and connectivity specialists to understand integration challenges and service model preferences.

Secondary research encompassed a review of technical literature on sensor chemistries and detection modalities, standards and regulatory guidance related to air quality and food safety in horticultural contexts, and publicly available product specifications and whitepapers. In parallel, an empirical evaluation framework was used to assess representative sensor modules under controlled environmental conditions that mimic greenhouse and storage environments, focusing on response time, cross-sensitivity, drift behavior, and calibration stability. Connectivity stacks were evaluated for bandwidth, latency, and power draw to inform deployment trade-offs between wired and wireless approaches.

Data synthesis applied cross-validation techniques and scenario-based analysis to develop practical recommendations. Sensitivity checks addressed environmental variability and supply chain disruptions, and findings were subjected to peer review by independent horticulture and sensor technology experts to ensure technical accuracy and practical applicability.

Concluding synthesis that positions gas sensing as a systems capability essential for improving horticultural resilience, quality, and operational efficiency

The integration of gas sensing into horticultural practice represents a strategic inflection point where measurement fidelity meets operational decision-making. Across sensor types and connectivity options, the imperative is clear: align technical capabilities with the specific gas targets, environmental stressors, and user requirements that characterize each deployment. When sensors are chosen and integrated with this alignment in mind, they become catalysts for improved crop outcomes, reduced waste, and more efficient resource utilization.

However, realizing this potential requires deliberate actions across the technology lifecycle-from design and sourcing to calibration, service, and data governance. The cumulative effects of trade policy shifts, regional regulatory expectations, and diverse application contexts argue for flexible business models, modular hardware, and robust validation protocols. By focusing on these priorities, stakeholders can de-risk implementations, accelerate adoption, and translate measurement data into measurable operational improvements.

In conclusion, gas sensing is not merely an instrumentation upgrade; it is a systems capability that, when executed with discipline and foresight, materially strengthens horticultural competitiveness, sustainability, and resilience. Organizations that invest in validated technologies, resilient supply chains, and outcome-driven pilots will be positioned to capture the full value that advanced sensing enables.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.5. Market Outlook
  • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Horticultural Gas Sensors Market, by Sensor Type

• 8.1. Catalytic Bead
• 8.2. Electrochemical
• 8.3. Infrared
• 8.4. Metal Oxide Semiconductor
  • 8.4.1. Tin Oxide
  • 8.4.2. Zinc Oxide
• 8.5. Photoionization

9. Horticultural Gas Sensors Market, by Gas Target

• 9.1. Ammonia
• 9.2. Carbon Dioxide
• 9.3. Ethylene
• 9.4. Oxygen

10. Horticultural Gas Sensors Market, by Connectivity

• 10.1. Wired
  • 10.1.1. Ethernet
  • 10.1.2. Serial
• 10.2. Wireless
  • 10.2.1. Bluetooth
  • 10.2.2. LoRaWAN
  • 10.2.3. WiFi

11. Horticultural Gas Sensors Market, by Application

• 11.1. Field Monitoring
  • 11.1.1. Open Field
  • 11.1.2. Polytunnel
• 11.2. Greenhouses
  • 11.2.1. Hydroponic
  • 11.2.2. Soil Based
  • 11.2.3. Vertical
• 11.3. Indoor Farming
  • 11.3.1. Controlled Environment Agriculture
  • 11.3.2. Vertical
• 11.4. Storage & Logistics
  • 11.4.1. Cold Storage
  • 11.4.2. Transportation
  • 11.4.3. Warehouses

12. Horticultural Gas Sensors Market, by End User

• 12.1. Commercial Growers
• 12.2. Government Agencies
• 12.3. Research Institutes
• 12.4. Technology Providers

13. Horticultural Gas Sensors Market, by Region

• 13.1. Americas
  • 13.1.1. North America
  • 13.1.2. Latin America
• 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 13.2.1. Europe
  • 13.2.2. Middle East
  • 13.2.3. Africa
• 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Horticultural Gas Sensors Market, by Group

• 14.1. ASEAN
• 14.2. GCC
• 14.3. European Union
• 14.4. BRICS
• 14.5. G7
• 14.6. NATO

15. Horticultural Gas Sensors Market, by Country

• 15.1. United States
• 15.2. Canada
• 15.3. Mexico
• 15.4. Brazil
• 15.5. United Kingdom
• 15.6. Germany
• 15.7. France
• 15.8. Russia
• 15.9. Italy
• 15.10. Spain
• 15.11. China
• 15.12. India
• 15.13. Japan
• 15.14. Australia
• 15.15. South Korea

16. United States Horticultural Gas Sensors Market

17. China Horticultural Gas Sensors Market

18. Competitive Landscape

• 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
• 18.5. Amphenol Advanced Sensors, LLC
• 18.6. Dragerwerk AG & Co. KGaA
• 18.7. E+E Elektronik Ges.m.b.H.
• 18.8. Figaro Engineering Inc.
• 18.9. Honeywell International Inc.
• 18.10. Rotronic AG
• 18.11. Senseair AB
• 18.12. Sensirion AG
• 18.13. Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
• 18.14. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
• 18.15. Vaisala Oyj