1,2-프로판디올 시장 : 등급별, 유통 경로별, 포장별, 용도별 - 세계 예측(2026-2032년)

The 1,2-Propanediol Market was valued at USD 186.54 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 202.08 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 9.08%, reaching USD 342.76 million by 2032.

A concise orientation to the multifunctional role of 1,2-propanediol in formulations, supply dynamics, sustainability pressures, and regulatory influences shaping procurement decisions

1,2-Propanediol, commonly used across both consumer-facing and industrial formulations, has become a cornerstone intermediate in product formulations where solvency, hygroscopicity, and low toxicity are required. The compound's versatility extends from formulations in personal care and pharmaceuticals to thermal management fluids in transportation, reflecting its dual role as an ingredient and as a functional process chemical. Supply-side considerations, including feedstock availability and refining capacity, interact with demand-side trends driven by formulation innovation and heightened regulatory scrutiny that together shape strategic choices for manufacturers and buyers.

Recent shifts toward sustainability and bio-based inputs have reframed procurement discussions, prompting buyers to seek traceability and lower lifecycle emissions across supply chains. Concurrently, regulatory frameworks and safety standards continue to evolve, influencing product specifications and qualification pathways for pharmaceutical and food-grade applications. These dynamics require a clearer articulation of where 1,2-propanediol delivers competitive value and where substitution risks or formulation reformulation efforts may accelerate.

Operational leaders must therefore assess both short-term sourcing risks and longer-term technology trajectories. From raw material logistics to packaging and distribution, a holistic view of the value chain enables better alignment of production footprints with end-market requirements. By integrating commercial intelligence with technical and regulatory insights, stakeholders can prioritize investments that protect margins, support compliance, and unlock new application opportunities across established and emerging end-use segments.

How technological innovation, evolving regulatory demands, and downstream formulation priorities are collectively redefining competitive advantage and supply chain strategies in the 1,2-propanediol market

The landscape for 1,2-propanediol is being reshaped by a set of transformative shifts that are simultaneously technical, commercial, and regulatory. Technological innovations in bioprocessing and catalytic routes are creating alternative production pathways that reduce reliance on traditional petrochemical feedstocks. As these technologies mature, they increase competitive pressure on incumbent producers to demonstrate lower lifecycle emissions and to invest in scalable, cost-competitive biobased solutions.

On the commercial side, downstream formulation trends in personal care and pharmaceuticals are prioritizing multifunctional ingredients that deliver performance while meeting increasingly stringent safety and sustainability criteria. This demand signal is accelerating certification efforts and compelling suppliers to provide more robust documentation on raw material provenance, impurity profiles, and manufacturing controls. At the same time, procurement teams are re-evaluating distribution models to mitigate logistics disruptions and to secure flexible packaging options that support just-in-time inventories and rapid SKU changes.

Regulatory momentum toward stricter chemical registration, data transparency, and product stewardship is heightening compliance costs and creating barriers to entry for smaller suppliers lacking the resources to navigate complex registration regimes. As a consequence, industry participants are consolidating technical capabilities through partnerships, licensing arrangements, and targeted investments in process improvements. These strategic responses are altering competitive dynamics, privileging organizations that can combine scale, technical expertise, and agility in addressing the intersection of sustainability, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

An evidence-based assessment of how trade measures introduced in 2025 have redirected sourcing, investment, and risk mitigation behaviors across the 1,2-propanediol value chain

The cumulative impact of tariff measures enacted in and around 2025 has created a material reorientation of trade flows, sourcing strategies, and risk management approaches across the 1,2-propanediol supply chain. Tariff actions designed to protect domestic production or to respond to perceived unfair trade practices have had a twofold effect: they have raised landed input costs for certain buyers and have incentivized reconfiguration of supply chains to alternative origins or to domestic capacity expansion where commercially viable.

Companies dependent on imports from jurisdictions subject to tariffs have had to revisit supplier qualification timelines and inventory policies, opting in many cases to extend lead times or to increase safety stocks to smooth price and availability volatility. This has translated into intensified negotiations around long-term contracts and into the exploration of hedging and vertical integration as strategies to stabilize input availability and cost exposure. In parallel, some buyers accelerated contracts with geographically proximate suppliers to reduce exposure to cross-border trade frictions and to shorten response times for new product introductions.

Tariffs have also influenced investment decisions at the manufacturing level. Producers evaluating capacity expansions have incorporated trade policy scenarios into their capital allocation models, weighing the merits of onshoring, brownfield upgrades, or establishing toll-manufacturing arrangements. These strategic choices are informed not only by short-term tariff impacts but also by anticipated regulatory alignment, logistics considerations, and customer preferences for local supply. Consequently, the policy environment has become a key determinant of where incremental capacity is most likely to be committed, with implications for regional competitiveness and long-term cost structures.

Across the value chain, the necessity of transparent commercial and compliance documentation has increased. Buyers and regulators are demanding clearer evidence of origin, quality controls, and adherence to petrochemical feedstock standards. The combined effect of tariffs and heightened regulatory scrutiny is therefore driving greater collaboration between procurement, legal, and technical teams to ensure continuity of supply while preserving product quality and compliance integrity.

Actionable segmentation intelligence revealing how application, grade, distribution channel, and packaging choices jointly determine procurement complexity, qualification cycles, and margin outcomes

Segmentation insights reveal where demand resilience and margin differentials are most pronounced across application, grade, distribution channel, and packaging choices. On the basis of application, market analyses examine Food & Beverage, Personal Care, Pharmaceuticals, and Transportation & Heat Transfer, with the Personal Care segment broken down further into Cosmetics, Hair Care, Oral Care, and Skin Care, and the Transportation & Heat Transfer segment further separated into Coolants & Antifreeze and Hydraulic Fluids. This lens shows that formulation complexity and regulatory requirements vary sharply by end use, with pharmaceutical and food applications commanding more rigorous impurity specifications and longer qualification cycles compared with industrial heat transfer fluids.

Grade segmentation differentiates between Cosmetic Grade, Food Grade, Industrial Grade, and Pharmaceutical Grade, and this differentiation dictates sourcing strategies and quality control investments. Firms targeting pharmaceutical or food-grade supply chains must maintain tighter manufacturing controls, more extensive testing regimes, and validated traceability systems, whereas industrial-grade applications present more flexibility on impurity tolerances and packaging economics.

Distribution channel segmentation contrasts Direct Sales versus Distributors, which influences commercial reach, margin structures, and customer service capabilities. Producers selling directly to large formulators often develop integrated technical support and co-development services, while distributor-led channels emphasize breadth of portfolio, inventory depth, and responsiveness for smaller account segments. Packaging segmentation, covering Bulk Shipments, Drums, and Intermediate Bulk Containers, interacts with customer order profiles and storage logistics; bulk movements favor large consumers with tank infrastructure, drums support smaller-scale formulators or those requiring tighter lot segregation, and intermediate bulk containers balance handling efficiency with preservation of product integrity.

Taken together, these segmentation dimensions inform go-to-market strategies, pricing frameworks, and investment priorities. Manufacturers and sellers that align production grades, packaging formats, and channel structures with the nuanced demands of each application category are positioned to capture higher-value contracts and to reduce churn associated with product requalification or logistical misalignment.

A nuanced appraisal of how regional regulatory frameworks, feedstock access, manufacturing integration, and downstream demand patterns are sculpting competitive positions across global regions

Regional characteristics materially shape supply, demand, regulatory regimes, and the pace of technological adoption across the 1,2-propanediol landscape. In the Americas, proximity to large coatings, personal care, and industrial end users supports established logistics networks and a concentration of downstream formulators. The region's supply chain responsiveness is often enhanced by integrated petrochemical hubs and by a strong presence of specialty chemical service providers, which together enable faster product development cycles and closer collaboration on regulatory compliance for sensitive grades.

In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency and sustainability commitments are prominent drivers. European markets, in particular, are characterized by advanced chemical stewardship frameworks and by an active policy emphasis on lowering carbon intensity, which accelerates interest in biobased production pathways and in manufacturing upgrades to reduce emissions. Markets in the Middle East capitalize on feedstock advantage to supply regional demand and to serve export markets, while parts of Africa present selective growth opportunities tied to infrastructure investment and industrialization initiatives.

Asia-Pacific displays a diversity of competitive dynamics, with mature manufacturing bases in some economies and rapidly expanding downstream demand in others. The region is notable for both large-scale petrochemical integration and for growing investment in bioprocessing capabilities. Supply chain resilience in Asia-Pacific is shaped by logistics density, proximity to major consumer markets, and by varied regulatory requirements across jurisdictions that influence export patterns and qualification timelines.

Across regions, trade and tariff policies, infrastructure quality, and the prevalence of local versus multinational formulators determine the optimal commercial and manufacturing footprints. Strategic decisions around where to site production, how to structure distribution, and which grades to prioritize should therefore reflect these regional nuances to ensure alignment with customer preferences, regulatory compliance, and long-term cost competitiveness.

Insights into competitive structures, strategic positioning, and the operational capabilities that determine which suppliers capture premium contracts and sustain long-term partnerships

Competitive dynamics are being reshaped by a mix of incumbent scale players, specialty chemical suppliers, emerging biotechnology entrants, and distribution partners that together create a layered ecosystem. Large integrated chemical companies leverage scale, feedstock integration, and established customer relationships to secure long-term contracts and to underwrite significant capital investments in process optimization and capacity upgrades. These attributes support reliable supply for major formulators while placing pressure on smaller producers to differentiate on agility, niche grades, or service offerings.

Specialty firms and contract manufacturers focus on high-value niches such as pharmaceutical and cosmetic grades, where technical service, validated quality systems, and shorter lead-times are decisive. Their role in the ecosystem is increasingly important as formulators demand customized impurity profiles, rapid trial material, and regulatory documentation support. Biotechnology and green-chemistry entrants are introducing alternative production pathways that attract interest from sustainability-conscious buyers, although scale-up risk and cost parity remain considerations that govern their commercial adoption.

Distributors continue to play a critical role in market access, inventory management, and last-mile responsiveness, particularly for smaller formulators and regional customers. Their ability to bundle complementary chemistries and to provide flexible packaging options enhances customer convenience and reduces procurement complexity. Strategic partnerships between suppliers and distributors that incorporate shared inventory models and co-marketing activities are emerging as effective mechanisms to improve time-to-market and to capture incremental demand.

Across these company types, successful players are those that align technical capability with commercial flexibility. They invest in quality systems, in regulatory expertise, and in digital tools for demand forecasting and logistics optimization. Additionally, firms that proactively pursue decarbonization measures and transparent supply chain reporting find it easier to engage large multinational customers that have strict sustainability procurement criteria.

Practical, high-impact strategic measures industry leaders can implement to fortify supply resilience, accelerate technical differentiation, and achieve measurable sustainability goals

Industry leaders should adopt an integrated strategy that combines supply resilience, technical differentiation, and sustainability commitments to secure competitive advantage. First, strengthening supply chain visibility through multi-sourcing strategies, longer-term contractual arrangements with contingency clauses, and scenario planning for trade policy shocks will reduce exposure to abrupt cost and availability disruptions. Investing in digital supply chain tools to improve demand signal accuracy and to coordinate inventory across production, warehousing, and distribution nodes will further mitigate risk and lower working capital requirements.

Second, prioritizing grade- and application-specific technical capabilities will unlock premium segments. This involves enhancing laboratory and validation processes to shorten qualification timelines for food and pharmaceutical grades, and partnering with key formulators to co-develop tailored solutions. Upgrading quality management systems and expanding documentation capabilities will be essential to serve regulated end markets and to build trust with major buyers.

Third, committing to measurable sustainability initiatives-from feedstock traceability and lifecycle assessments to emissions reductions in manufacturing-will meet rising procurement thresholds and enable market access where sustainability is a gating criterion. Leaders should evaluate investments in low-carbon process technologies and consider collaboration with bioprocess providers to pilot alternative production pathways.

Finally, optimizing commercial models across distribution channels and packaging formats will increase customer satisfaction and margin performance. Tailoring packaging to customer scale and storage capabilities, while working with distributors to offer flexible inventory solutions, will improve service levels and reduce friction in customer onboarding. By executing on these fronts concurrently, companies can create defensible differentiation and position themselves to capture long-term value across diverse end uses.

A rigorous multi-modal research design combining primary stakeholder interviews, supply chain mapping, and scenario analysis to produce validated, actionable insights for decision-makers

The research combined a structured, multi-source methodology to synthesize technical, commercial, and policy intelligence. Primary research elements included interviews with procurement leaders, formulation scientists, chemical engineers, and logistics managers across producer, distributor, and end-user organizations to capture firsthand perspectives on supply chain constraints, quality requirements, and commercialization hurdles. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with secondary sources such as regulatory filings, patent databases, and publicly available technical literature to validate technology trajectories and to understand compliance landscapes.

Supply chain mapping traced raw material origins, processing nodes, and key logistics corridors to identify potential bottlenecks and to assess regional production competitiveness. Scenario analysis explored the implications of tariff measures, regulatory changes, and alternate production technologies on sourcing strategies and capital allocation decisions, enabling stress testing of strategic responses under different policy and market conditions.

Quality assurance of the research findings involved cross-validation with subject-matter experts and iterative workshops with industry stakeholders to refine assumptions and to ensure practical applicability. Data governance protocols were employed to maintain the integrity and confidentiality of proprietary information gathered during primary research. The resulting evidence base reflects a synthesis of operational realities, technical feasibility, and regulatory constraints to support actionable recommendations for commercial, technical, and policy audiences.

A concluding synthesis that connects supply resilience, technical differentiation, and sustainability commitments into a cohesive strategic imperative for market participants

In summation, the evolving 1,2-propanediol landscape requires a deliberate blending of operational resilience, technical rigor, and sustainability foresight. Stakeholders that proactively align production capabilities, quality systems, and commercial channels with the nuanced demands of diverse end uses will be better positioned to withstand trade policy volatility and to capture value in higher-specification segments. The combined pressures of regulatory tightening, customer sustainability expectations, and technological innovation create both risk and opportunity: risk for those who fail to adapt, and opportunity for those who invest in differentiation and supply chain agility.

Strategic priorities include strengthening multi-sourcing and inventory strategies, accelerating qualification capabilities for regulated grades, and pursuing credible decarbonization pathways. Companies that cultivate transparent supplier relationships and that demonstrate measurable environmental performance will find improved access to global customers and reduced friction in cross-border trade. Ultimately, the firms that balance commercial pragmatism with targeted investment in quality and sustainability will secure durable competitive advantages and will be best positioned to convert regulatory and technological change into profitable growth.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.5. Market Outlook
  • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. 1,2-Propanediol Market, by Grade

• 8.1. Cosmetic Grade
• 8.2. Food Grade
• 8.3. Industrial Grade
• 8.4. Pharmaceutical Grade

9. 1,2-Propanediol Market, by Distribution Channel

• 9.1. Direct Sales
• 9.2. Distributors

10. 1,2-Propanediol Market, by Packaging

• 10.1. Bulk Shipments
• 10.2. Drums
• 10.3. Intermediate Bulk Containers

11. 1,2-Propanediol Market, by Application

• 11.1. Food & Beverage
• 11.2. Personal Care
  • 11.2.1. Cosmetics
  • 11.2.2. Hair Care
  • 11.2.3. Oral Care
  • 11.2.4. Skin Care
• 11.3. Pharmaceuticals
• 11.4. Transportation & Heat Transfer
  • 11.4.1. Coolants & Antifreeze
  • 11.4.2. Hydraulic Fluids

12. 1,2-Propanediol Market, by Region

• 12.1. Americas
  • 12.1.1. North America
  • 12.1.2. Latin America
• 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 12.2.1. Europe
  • 12.2.2. Middle East
  • 12.2.3. Africa
• 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. 1,2-Propanediol Market, by Group

• 13.1. ASEAN
• 13.2. GCC
• 13.3. European Union
• 13.4. BRICS
• 13.5. G7
• 13.6. NATO

14. 1,2-Propanediol Market, by Country

• 14.1. United States
• 14.2. Canada
• 14.3. Mexico
• 14.4. Brazil
• 14.5. United Kingdom
• 14.6. Germany
• 14.7. France
• 14.8. Russia
• 14.9. Italy
• 14.10. Spain
• 14.11. China
• 14.12. India
• 14.13. Japan
• 14.14. Australia
• 14.15. South Korea

15. United States 1,2-Propanediol Market

16. China 1,2-Propanediol Market

17. Competitive Landscape

• 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
• 17.5. Archer Daniels Midland Company
• 17.6. Asahi Kasei Corporation
• 17.7. BASF SE
• 17.8. Daze Group Co., Ltd.
• 17.9. Dow Inc.
• 17.10. Global Bio-chem Technology Group Co., Ltd.
• 17.11. Hi-tech Spring Chemical Co., Ltd.
• 17.12. Huntsman Corporation
• 17.13. INEOS Group Limited
• 17.14. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
• 17.15. Shandong Depu Chemical Co., Ltd.
• 17.16. Shandong Shida Shenghua Chemical Co., Ltd.
• 17.17. Shell Chemicals B.V.
• 17.18. SKC Co., Ltd.
• 17.19. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
• 17.20. Tongling Jintai Chemical Co., Ltd.