단일기능성 무수물 시장 : 용도별, 최종 용도 산업별, 프로세스별, 등급별 - 세계 예측(2026-2032년)

The Monofunctional Anhydride Market was valued at USD 996.69 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 1,056.38 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.86%, reaching USD 1,586.74 million by 2032.

A thorough orientation to monofunctional anhydride chemistry, industrial functionality, and why its control and sourcing matter across value chains

Monofunctional anhydrides occupy a distinctive niche in modern chemical manufacturing, serving as reactive intermediates that impart functionality, processability, and performance to a range of downstream materials. Their single anhydride group enables controlled modification of polymers, enhances adhesion at interfaces, and facilitates crosslinking in resin systems without introducing polyfunctional crosslink density. Consequently, these reagents are selected when formulators seek predictable reactivity, lower viscosity handling, and compatibility with a broad spectrum of substrates.

Across supply chains, the raw material pathways, catalyst choices, and process conditions determine both the impurity profile and the consistent availability of monofunctional anhydrides. In turn, these factors influence downstream formulation windows, shelf stability, and end-use performance. Regulatory frameworks and evolving sustainability expectations are reshaping procurement criteria, elevating traceability, and increasing demand for low-residual and specialty grades. As a result, manufacturers and end users alike are prioritizing secure sourcing, robust quality control, and supplier transparency.

Moreover, technological advances in catalytic hydrogenation and selective oxidation enable more efficient conversion of feedstocks into targeted anhydrides, reducing by-product formation and improving atom economy. These process innovations, combined with heightened focus on lifecycle impacts, are altering investment priorities and driving strategic partnerships between feedstock suppliers, process licensers, and specialty chemical formulators. Consequently, stakeholders who understand the interplay between process engineering, regulatory compliance, and application performance can better position themselves to capture premium opportunities and mitigate supply disruption risks.

How sustainability mandates, catalytic innovations, regulatory tightening, and evolving end-use demands are redefining value drivers across the monofunctional anhydride ecosystem

The landscape for monofunctional anhydrides is undergoing transformative shifts driven by a convergence of technological, regulatory, and commercial forces. First, the accelerating emphasis on sustainability has prompted process redesigns that reduce energy intensity, minimize hazardous byproducts, and increase feedstock flexibility. This shift is not merely incremental; it reshapes investment flows, supplier capabilities, and purchaser expectations by privileging lower-impact routes and grades that support circularity goals.

Concurrently, innovation in catalytic systems and reactor platforms is enabling more selective transformations, which in turn unlocks higher-purity grades and broader application windows. These technical advances are reducing downstream processing burdens and creating opportunities for formulators to replace multipurpose chemistries with more targeted monofunctional solutions. As a result, product portfolios are becoming more differentiated, with a premium placed on performance stability and traceable supply chains.

In addition, evolving regulatory regimes and chemical safety standards are prompting manufacturers to revalidate processes and documentation, thereby increasing the value of supplier transparency and technical support. At the same time, shifts in end-use industries-such as the electrification of vehicles, new packaging sustainability mandates, and the expansion of advanced materials in electronics-are changing demand patterns for specific grades, formulations, and functional additives. Taken together, these forces are compressing time horizons for commercialization, increasing the importance of agile supply strategies, and rewarding firms that integrate technical innovation with robust compliance and customer engagement.

How the 2025 tariff environment in the United States is reshaping sourcing strategies, supply resilience planning, and tariff mitigation practices for reactive chemical intermediates

The tariff measures implemented in the United States in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity to global sourcing and pricing dynamics for monofunctional anhydrides and related intermediates. Tariff differentials have prompted procurement teams to reassess supplier footprints, reroute shipments, and prioritize regional supply resilience. In many cases, the increased cost of certain import lanes has accelerated long-planned diversification efforts and renewed interest in nearshoring as a mechanism to control landed costs and lead times.

As a direct consequence, supply chain strategies have shifted towards a combination of vendor redundancy and strategic inventory positioning. Procurement functions are increasingly negotiating multi-year agreements that include contingency clauses and flexible volume commitments to manage tariff risk. At the same time, some manufacturers have responded by adjusting production schedules and optimizing freight consolidation to blunt the immediate financial impact. These operational responses highlight the need for dynamic sourcing playbooks that can be rapidly adapted when trade policy changes.

Moreover, tariffs have altered competitive dynamics among regions, making certain domestic production assets more attractive to end users who seek to avoid import complexity. This change has encouraged investments in capacity expansions and technology upgrades in selectively advantaged regions. Importantly, a nuanced regulatory compliance program that combines tariff classification expertise, origin documentation, and customs planning has become a critical capability for both suppliers and buyers. Firms that integrate trade policy analysis into procurement and commercial planning are better positioned to preserve margins and secure supply continuity in an era of tariff volatility.

Integrated segmentation perspective showing how applications, end-use industries, processing routes, and grade categories determine specification needs and commercialization paths

Insight into segmentation reveals how application specificity, end-use demands, process selection, and grade differentiation collectively shape technology choices and commercialization pathways. Based on Application, the landscape spans Additives, Adhesives and Sealants, Coatings, Copolymer Production, Plasticizers, and Unsaturated Polyester Resin, each with distinct performance and purity requirements. Within Adhesives and Sealants, the roles of coupling agents and curing agents create divergent specification tails: coupling agents demand surface chemistry precision to enhance adhesion to mineral and glass substrates, while curing agents prioritize predictable kinetics and compatibility with diverse polymer matrices. In Coatings, the split between Industrial Coatings and UV Curable Coatings implies differing solvent systems, film formation behavior, and regulatory compliance considerations, with UV systems placing a premium on low residuals and photochemical stability.

Turning to Copolymer Production, differentiation between Acrylonitrile Styrene Maleic Anhydride and Styrene Maleic Anhydride Copolymer reflects the need for controlled incorporation rates and residual control to meet thermal and mechanical performance targets. In the Plasticizers segment, contrasts between Non-Phthalate Plasticizers and Phthalate Ester Plasticizers are driving substitution dynamics, regulatory scrutiny, and formulation reengineering. For Unsaturated Polyester Resin, the distinction between Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyester and Sheet Molding Compound influences resin viscosity, curing profiles, and end-part performance, thereby dictating the selection of specific monofunctional anhydride grades and impurity tolerances.

Based on End Use Industry, the market extends across Automotive, Construction, Electrical and Electronics, Packaging, and Pharmaceuticals, with each vertical imposing unique functional and regulatory demands. Automotive applications bifurcate into Exterior Components and Interior Components, where exterior parts require long-term weatherability and UV resistance while interiors prioritize low VOCs and tactile performance. Construction use cases, split between Building Insulation and Infrastructure Components, stress thermal stability and long service life. In Electrical and Electronics, Circuit Boards and Dielectric Capacitors demand dielectric integrity and thermal endurance, whereas Packaging differentiates Flexible Packaging from Rigid Packaging based on barrier properties and processing temperatures. Pharmaceuticals, encompassing Drug Carriers and Excipients, requires the highest purity controls and regulatory documentation, which affects grade selection and supplier audit priorities.

Process segmentation between Hydrogenation and Oxidation dictates the impurity profiles and residual reagents that downstream formulators must manage. Hydrogenation pathways, which include Catalytic Hydrogenation and Transfer Hydrogenation, can yield different saturation levels and selectivity outcomes that influence reactivity and color. Oxidation routes, subdivided into Catalytic Gas Phase Oxidation and Liquid Phase Oxidation, present distinct scalability and control advantages and impose different safety and emissions management practices.

Finally, Grade segmentation into Specialty, Standard, and Technical frames commercial positioning and value capture strategies. Specialty grades, including Food and High Purity categories, command rigorous analytical traceability and bespoke production controls. Standard grades offer broad compatibility for commodity applications, while Technical grades, comprising Industrial and Pharmaceutical subcategories, align with cost-performance tradeoffs required by specific manufacturing processes. Taken together, these multiple segmentation axes provide a roadmap for product development, channel strategy, and compliance investments that align technical attributes to end-use requirements.

How regional demand drivers, regulatory frameworks, and production ecosystems across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific shape sourcing, capacity, and innovation priorities

Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on supply chain design, regulatory compliance, and commercial positioning for monofunctional anhydride producers and end users. In the Americas, the combination of advanced materials demand and proximity to major automotive and packaging OEMs creates opportunities for specialty grade adoption, but it also places a premium on resilient domestic supply and tariff-aware sourcing. Regional infrastructure and logistics capabilities support tactical inventory strategies, while environmental permitting and safety regulations shape process investments and site selection.

In Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory rigor, sustainability targets, and legacy manufacturing clusters drive distinct behaviors. The EMEA region exhibits early uptake of low-emission technologies and a strong focus on circularity, encouraging process retrofits and partnerships focused on feedstock substitution. Energy pricing volatility and regional trade patterns further influence where capacity expansions are economically viable, while proximity to research institutions facilitates collaborative development of specialty formulations and application testing.

Across Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization, expanding electronics and packaging sectors, and competitive raw material access make the region a focal point for volume production and capacity scaling. However, heterogeneous regulatory regimes and localized supplier ecosystems create a mosaic of compliance requirements and customer expectations. As a result, companies often pursue regionally optimized go-to-market strategies, blending global technology platforms with local manufacturing footprints to meet cost, lead-time, and specification demands. Collectively, these regional distinctions underscore the importance of aligning production, regulatory strategy, and commercial engagement with the unique drivers operating in each geography.

Competitive strategies and operational differentiators among producers highlighting capacity decisions, R&D focus, and customer engagement practices that determine market positioning

Competitive behaviors among leading firms reflect a balance between scale, specialty capabilities, and service-level differentiation. Global integrated chemical producers leverage their feedstock integration and logistics networks to offer dependable supply for commodity and standard grades, while specialty chemical manufacturers focus on technical support, rapid prototyping, and higher-purity products tailored to demanding end uses. Regional producers frequently compete on responsiveness and cost-to-serve for adjacent markets where logistical advantages matter.

Strategic moves in the sector include capacity investments aimed at improving geographical coverage, targeted R&D to broaden product portfolios, and commercial partnerships that mitigate feedstock or technology risks. Firms that combine upstream integration with strong application labs and field technical service teams gain traction with formulators who require both product performance and problem-solving support. Additionally, collaboration between chemical producers and OEMs or compounders accelerates product qualification cycles and reinforces customer lock-in through co-development and specification alignment.

Operational excellence in quality assurance, regulatory documentation, and supply continuity differentiates competitors in high-value segments. Companies that publish transparent quality control specifications, maintain audited supply chains, and offer extended technical validation services are more likely to win long-term contracts with regulated end users. Finally, premium positioning around sustainability credentials and traceable raw materials is creating a new axis of competition, rewarding firms that can demonstrate verifiable reductions in environmental footprint and robust chain-of-custody controls.

Practical strategic initiatives for producers and buyers to strengthen supply resilience, accelerate product differentiation, and align sustainability commitments with commercial goals

Industry leaders should prioritize a set of strategic actions that align technical capability with commercial resilience to capture emerging opportunities and mitigate systemic risks. First, diversify supply bases by combining regional production, strategic inventory hubs, and dual-sourcing arrangements to reduce exposure to tariff volatility and logistical disruption. Complementing sourcing diversification with proactive tariff classification and customs planning will reduce unpredictability in landed costs and delivery schedules.

Second, invest in process modernization focused on catalytic selectivity and energy efficiency to lower production costs and improve impurity control. These investments not only reduce operating expenditures over time but also enable the development of specialty grades that meet stringent performance and regulatory requirements. Third, deepen application partnerships with key end users to co-develop formulations and shorten qualification cycles; embedding technical service teams within customer innovation programs accelerates adoption and creates higher switching costs.

Fourth, pursue a clear sustainability roadmap that includes measurable targets for emissions, waste reduction, and feedstock traceability. This roadmap should be integrated with product labeling and documentation practices that support customer procurement due diligence. Fifth, strengthen regulatory intelligence capabilities to monitor trade policy, chemical safety changes, and evolving standards, and incorporate scenario planning into commercial agreements. By following these steps, companies can build more resilient, differentiated, and future-fit businesses that adapt rapidly to shifting market and policy conditions.

A robust mixed-methods research approach integrating expert interviews, technical literature review, regulatory analysis, and iterative validation to ensure actionable findings

The research approach combines primary engagement with industry experts and secondary synthesis of technical literature, regulatory filings, and publicly available operational disclosures to ensure comprehensive coverage and validation. Primary research involved in-depth interviews with formulation scientists, procurement leaders, process engineering specialists, and regulatory affairs professionals to capture real-world constraints, qualification timelines, and operational priorities. These conversations provided nuanced insights into specification tolerances, supplier selection criteria, and the practical impact of process impurities on end-use performance.

Secondary inputs included peer-reviewed papers on catalytic processes, safety and environmental regulations, patent disclosures for reaction and purification technologies, and trade data that highlights directional flows and tariff impacts. Information was triangulated by cross-referencing multiple sources and by reconciling qualitative interview findings with technical documentation to identify consistent patterns and emergent inflection points. Where appropriate, sensitivity checks and scenario analyses were applied to evaluate alternative supply chain responses and regulatory outcomes.

Finally, the methodology incorporated an iterative validation step wherein draft findings were reviewed with a subset of industry participants to ensure factual accuracy and practical relevance. This validation cycle improved the robustness of conclusions and refined actionable recommendations so that they are operationally applicable for procurement, R&D, and corporate strategy teams.

Concluding synthesis that distills how technical, regulatory, and commercial forces converge to define competitive advantage and supply resilience in this chemical segment

In summary, monofunctional anhydrides are positioned at a pivotal intersection of application demand, process innovation, and regulatory influence. Their utility across adhesives, coatings, copolymer production, plasticizers, and unsaturated polyester resins makes them indispensable to a broad set of industrial ecosystems. At the same time, evolving sustainability expectations, catalytic advances, and trade policy developments are reshaping supplier incentives and buyer requirements, elevating the importance of supply chain resilience and technical differentiation.

Going forward, companies that align process investments with application-driven quality needs, and that build flexible sourcing strategies, will be best placed to manage policy shocks and capitalize on premium opportunities. The combination of targeted R&D, proactive trade planning, and customer-centric technical support forms the backbone of a competitive posture in this dynamic environment. For stakeholders seeking to translate these insights into operational decisions, timely access to detailed validation data and supplier profiles will materially improve the speed and confidence of strategic moves.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.5. Market Outlook
  • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Monofunctional Anhydride Market, by Application

• 8.1. Additives
• 8.2. Adhesives And Sealants
  • 8.2.1. Coupling Agents
  • 8.2.2. Curing Agents
• 8.3. Coatings
  • 8.3.1. Industrial Coatings
  • 8.3.2. Uv Curable Coatings
• 8.4. Copolymer Production
  • 8.4.1. Acrylonitrile Styrene Maleic Anhydride
  • 8.4.2. Styrene Maleic Anhydride Copolymer
• 8.5. Plasticizers
  • 8.5.1. Non Phthalate Plasticizers
  • 8.5.2. Phthalate Ester Plasticizers
• 8.6. Unsaturated Polyester Resin
  • 8.6.1. Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyester
  • 8.6.2. Sheet Molding Compound

9. Monofunctional Anhydride Market, by End Use Industry

• 9.1. Automotive
  • 9.1.1. Exterior Components
  • 9.1.2. Interior Components
• 9.2. Construction
  • 9.2.1. Building Insulation
  • 9.2.2. Infrastructure Components
• 9.3. Electrical And Electronics
  • 9.3.1. Circuit Boards
  • 9.3.2. Dielectric Capacitors
• 9.4. Packaging
  • 9.4.1. Flexible Packaging
  • 9.4.2. Rigid Packaging
• 9.5. Pharmaceuticals
  • 9.5.1. Drug Carriers
  • 9.5.2. Excipients

10. Monofunctional Anhydride Market, by Process

• 10.1. Hydrogenation
  • 10.1.1. Catalytic Hydrogenation
  • 10.1.2. Transfer Hydrogenation
• 10.2. Oxidation
  • 10.2.1. Catalytic Gas Phase Oxidation
  • 10.2.2. Liquid Phase Oxidation

11. Monofunctional Anhydride Market, by Grade

• 11.1. Specialty
  • 11.1.1. Food
  • 11.1.2. High Purity
• 11.2. Standard
• 11.3. Technical
  • 11.3.1. Industrial
  • 11.3.2. Pharmaceutical

12. Monofunctional Anhydride Market, by Region

• 12.1. Americas
  • 12.1.1. North America
  • 12.1.2. Latin America
• 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 12.2.1. Europe
  • 12.2.2. Middle East
  • 12.2.3. Africa
• 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Monofunctional Anhydride Market, by Group

• 13.1. ASEAN
• 13.2. GCC
• 13.3. European Union
• 13.4. BRICS
• 13.5. G7
• 13.6. NATO

14. Monofunctional Anhydride Market, by Country

• 14.1. United States
• 14.2. Canada
• 14.3. Mexico
• 14.4. Brazil
• 14.5. United Kingdom
• 14.6. Germany
• 14.7. France
• 14.8. Russia
• 14.9. Italy
• 14.10. Spain
• 14.11. China
• 14.12. India
• 14.13. Japan
• 14.14. Australia
• 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Monofunctional Anhydride Market

16. China Monofunctional Anhydride Market

17. Competitive Landscape

• 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
• 17.5. Ataman Kimya
• 17.6. ATMOSA Petrochemie Gmbh
• 17.7. Emco Dyestuff Pvt Ltd
• 17.8. Henan GP Chemicals Co., Ltd
• 17.9. IG Petrochemicals Ltd
• 17.10. JFE Chemical Corporation
• 17.11. Lanxess
• 17.12. LXBIO
• 17.13. Nanya Plastics Industry Co., Ltd
• 17.14. Pluskim
• 17.15. Puyang Shenghuade Chemical Co., Ltd
• 17.16. Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd
• 17.17. Shandong Qingyang New Materials Co., Ltd
• 17.18. Stepan
• 17.19. Thirumalai Chemicals