시장보고서
상품코드
1969239

혈액제제 시장 : 제공 형태별, 구성요소별, 가공 자동화별, 조제 방법별, 용도별, 최종사용자별 - 예측(2026-2032년)

Blood Preparation Market by Offerings, Component, Processing Automation, Preparation Method, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 구분자 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 183 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

혈액제제 시장은 2025년에 480억 9,000만 달러로 평가되었습니다. 2026년에는 508억 1,000만 달러에 이르고, CAGR 5.93%로 성장을 지속하여 2032년까지 719억 8,000만 달러에 달할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 : 2025년 480억 9,000만 달러
추정 연도 : 2026년 508억 1,000만 달러
예측 연도 : 2032년 719억 8,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 5.93%

기술 촉진요인, 이해관계자 우선순위, 조달 고려사항에 중점을 두고 운영 전략을 형성하는 현재 혈액제제 생태계에 대한 종합적인 방향성 제시

혈액제제 생태계는 보다 안전하고 효율적이며 추적 가능한 생물학적 제제 흐름을 원하는 기관이 증가함에 따라 기술적, 운영적 측면에서 빠르게 고도화되고 있습니다. 채혈 및 보관 장비의 발전과 시설 관리 및 온도 모니터링을 위한 소프트웨어 계층의 확장과 함께 헌혈, 가공, 보관, 유통에 걸친 워크플로우가 재정의되고 있습니다. 혈액은행과 병원 수혈 부서에서 외래수술센터(ASC), 연구기관에 이르기까지 다양한 이해관계자들은 회복력, 자동화, 통합 품질 관리를 중시하는 방향으로 조달 우선순위를 재조정하고 있습니다.

혈액제제 분야의 안전, 자동화, 공급업체 협력 재정의, 혁신적인 기술, 업무 및 조달 변화의 통합적 전망

혈액제제 분야는 공급망과 임상 실무를 모두 변화시키는 여러 수렴 벡터를 따라 변화하고 있습니다. 첫째, 자동화는 단일 장비의 효율성을 넘어 자동화된 성분 추출, 원심분리, 온도 감지 보관 시스템을 통합한 조정된 워크플로우로 전환하여 수작업과 변동성을 줄이고 있습니다. 둘째, 백혈구 제거, 방사선 조사, 병원체 비활성화 등의 안전 기술이 다운스트림 공정의 위험을 줄이고 다양한 이용 사례를 지원하기 위해 처리 경로의 초기 단계에 통합되고 있습니다. 셋째, 소프트웨어를 활용한 프로세스 거버넌스가 성숙해지고 있으며, 온도 모니터링 시스템 및 혈액 시설 관리 시스템이 감사 가능성과 컴플라이언스 지원을 제공합니다. 기존에는 수작업에 의한 기록 관리에 의존해 왔습니다.

누적된 관세 조치가 혈액제제 가치사슬 전반의 조달 동향, 공급업체 전략 및 비즈니스 연속성을 어떻게 재구성했는지에 대한 명확한 분석

최근 관세 조치로 인해 혈액제제 가치사슬 전반의 조달 및 공급 탄력성에 심각한 복잡성이 발생했습니다. 수입 부품, 자본 장비 및 특정 소모품에 대한 누적 관세 조치는 국경 간 공급업체에 의존하는 기관의 총 소유 비용을 증가시켜 많은 조직이 공급업체 집중도와 리드 타임을 재평가하는 계기가 되었습니다. 그 결과, 조달팀은 무역 정책의 변동 리스크를 줄이기 위해 이중 소싱 전략과 지역 제조업체와의 긴밀한 협력을 우선시하고 있습니다.

조달 및 혁신 우선순위, 제공 품목, 처리 방법, 임상 적용, 자동화 수준, 구성 요소, 최종 사용자 요구 사항을 조달 및 혁신 우선순위에 매핑하는 본질적 세분화에 대한 인사이트

세분화는 제품 개발 로드맵과 조달 선택을 모두 촉진합니다. 최종 사용자는 제품이 임상적, 운영적 요구에 어떻게 대응하는지 명확하게 파악할 필요가 있기 때문입니다. 제공품에 따라 시장은 '일회용품 및 소모품', '장비', '소프트웨어'로 구성됩니다. 일회용 및 소모품에는 어펠레시스 키트, 혈액백 시스템, 백혈구 제거 필터, 이송 세트, 튜브 및 바늘 등이 포함되며, 이는 혈액센터 및 병원의 시술 당 비용과 수익률을 결정합니다. 장비는 채혈 장치, 조사 장치, 병원체 제거 시스템, 처리 장치, 저장 장치로 구성됩니다. 채혈 장비는 다시 채혈용 믹서, 자동 성분 분리기, 원심분리기로 구분되며, 처리 장비에는 자동 성분 분리기, 원심분리기가 포함됩니다. 보관 장비로는 혈액은행용 냉장고, 극저온 냉동고, 혈장 냉동고, 혈소판 인큐베이터 및 교반기 등이 있습니다. 소프트웨어는 재고 관리 및 규제 추적을 가능하게 하는 혈액 시설용 솔루션 및 온도 모니터링 플랫폼으로 구성되어 있습니다.

지역별로 미묘한 차이를 분석한 통합 인텔리전스 보고서는 북미, 남미, 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카, 아시아태평양의 동향이 도입 현황, 공급 탄력성, 규제 준수에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 설명합니다.

지역별 동향은 공급망, 규제 요건, 새로운 혈액제제 기술 도입 일정에 큰 영향을 미칩니다. 미국 대륙에서는 대규모의 기존 혈액 서비스 인프라, 첨단 병원 시스템, 자동화 및 안전 기술에 대한 집중도 증가가 특징입니다. 이러한 환경 하에서 상환 제도, 기존 공급업체와의 관계, 온도 관리 제품의 장거리 유통에 대한 물류 현실이 조달 결정에 영향을 미칩니다.

혈액제제 생태계 전반에서 공급업체 전략, 서비스 모델, 파트너십 접근법이 어떻게 경쟁우위를 형성하고 있는지에 대한 기업 차원에서 활용 가능한 경쟁 정보

혈액제제 분야의 경쟁 역학은 단일 제품의 우위보다는 생태계 내에서의 포지셔닝에 의해 정의됩니다. 주요 업체들은 일회용 제품, 자본 장비, 소프트웨어 기능을 결합한 종합적인 포트폴리오를 통해 차별화를 꾀하고 있으며, 공급업체와의 접촉을 최소화하고 예측 가능한 라이프사이클 비용을 원하는 구매자의 요구를 충족하는 엔드투엔드 가치 제안을 실현하고 있습니다. 주요 공급업체들 사이에서 관찰되는 전략적 행동에는 새로운 처리 기술을 검증하기 위한 임상 네트워크와의 파트너십 구축, 유지보수 리드타임 단축을 위한 지역 서비스 센터에 대한 투자, 첨단 장비 도입 장벽을 낮추기 위한 교육 및 인증 프로그램 제공 등이 포함됩니다.

혈액제제 분야공급업체, 의료 시스템 및 조달 책임자를 위한 탄력성, 안전성 및 기술 통합 강화를 위한 실용적이고 우선순위가 높은 제안

업계 리더는 공급의 탄력성, 안전성, 통합성을 직접적으로 개선하는 전략적 행동 포트폴리오를 우선순위에 두어야 합니다. 첫째, 채혈 및 보관 장비에 대한 자본 투자와 소모품 및 유지 보수에 대한 장기 계약의 균형을 맞추는 모듈형 조달 전략을 채택하여 총소유비용을 안정화시키고 관세 변동에 따른 가격 충격에 대한 노출을 줄입니다. 둘째, 혈액 시설 관리와 온도 모니터링의 소프트웨어 통합을 가속화하고, 투명하고 감사 가능한 워크플로우를 구축하여 인적 오류를 줄이고 규정 준수를 지원합니다.

전략적 인사이트 지원, 주요 이해관계자 인터뷰, 2차 기술 및 규제 정보 통합, 삼각측량을 통한 주제별 검증을 결합한 강력한 다방법론적 연구 프레임워크

본 Executive Summary를 뒷받침하는 분석은 실행 가능한 증거에 기반한 인사이트를 창출하기 위해 다각적인 연구 방법을 결합하여 이루어졌습니다. 2차 정보 통합을 위해, 우리는 동료 검토 문헌, 규제 지침, 기술 표준, 제조업체의 기술 사양을 활용하여 기술, 프로세스 및 컴플라이언스 요구 사항에 대한 종합적인 전체 그림을 구축했습니다. 1차 조사는 혈액은행 책임자, 병원 수혈부서 책임자, 조달 담당자, 임상병리사, 의료기기 기술자를 대상으로 구조화된 인터뷰를 통해 실제 제약요인과 도입 촉진요인을 파악했습니다.

혈액제제 이해관계자들의 핵심 요구사항으로 안전성, 회복력, 통합성을 통합하는 전략적 우선순위와 운영 조정의 결정적 통합을 꼽았습니다.

조사 결과는 의료기관과 공급업체가 거래 기반의 관계에서 강력한 조달, 자동화, 데이터 기반 품질 시스템을 결합한 통합적 가치 파트너십으로 전환해야 한다는 분명한 요구로 귀결됩니다. 공급자는 처리 자동화, 병원체 감소, 소프트웨어 거버넌스에 대한 투자를 단순한 자본 프로젝트가 아닌 임상적 일관성과 공급 강건성을 달성하기 위한 전략적 기반이라고 생각해야 합니다. 외래수술센터(ASC)부터 대규모 병원 네트워크에 이르기까지 다양한 최종 사용자의 미묘한 요구 사항을 충족시킬 수 있는 모듈식, 서비스, 상호운용성 솔루션을 제공하는 공급업체가 가장 적합한 위치에 있습니다.

자주 묻는 질문

  • 혈액제제 시장 규모는 어떻게 예측되나요?
  • 혈액제제 분야의 주요 기술 촉진 요인은 무엇인가요?
  • 혈액제제 분야에서 자동화의 역할은 무엇인가요?
  • 최근 관세 조치가 혈액제제 가치사슬에 미친 영향은 무엇인가요?
  • 혈액제제 시장의 주요 제공 품목은 무엇인가요?
  • 혈액제제 분야의 주요 기업은 어디인가요?

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향, 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향, 2025

제8장 혈액제제 시장 : 제공별

제9장 혈액제제 시장 : 컴포넌트별

제10장 혈액제제 시장 : 처리 자동화별

제11장 혈액제제 시장 : 조제 방법별

제12장 혈액제제 시장 : 용도별

제13장 혈액제제 시장 : 최종사용자별

제14장 혈액제제 시장 : 지역별

제15장 혈액제제 시장 : 그룹별

제16장 혈액제제 시장 : 국가별

제17장 미국의 혈액제제 시장

제18장 중국의 혈액제제 시장

제19장 경쟁 구도

LSH 26.03.30

The Blood Preparation Market was valued at USD 48.09 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 50.81 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.93%, reaching USD 71.98 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 48.09 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 50.81 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 71.98 billion
CAGR (%) 5.93%

A comprehensive orientation to the current blood preparation ecosystem highlighting technological enablers, stakeholder priorities, and procurement considerations shaping operational strategy

The blood preparation ecosystem is undergoing a period of rapid technological and operational refinement as institutions seek safer, more efficient, and more traceable flows of biological products. Advances in collection and storage hardware, combined with a growing software layer for establishment management and temperature monitoring, are redefining workflows across donation, processing, storage, and distribution. Stakeholders from blood banks and hospital transfusion services to ambulatory surgical centers and research organizations are recalibrating procurement priorities to emphasize resiliency, automation, and integrated quality controls.

Against this backdrop, procurement decision-makers must balance capital investments in collection devices, pathogen reduction systems, and storage infrastructure with recurring consumable needs such as apheresis kits, tubing, and filters. At the same time, clinical teams are emphasizing component integrity for plasma-derived therapies, transfusion support in oncology and cardiology, and specialized needs for immune and hepatic care. The introductory framing here establishes the operational tensions that follow through the analysis: securing supply continuity, minimizing contamination risk, and enabling seamless traceability through both hardware and software interventions.

An integrated view of transformative technological, operational, and procurement shifts that are redefining safety, automation, and supplier engagement across blood preparation

The landscape of blood preparation is shifting along several convergent vectors that are transforming both supply chains and clinical practice. First, automation is moving beyond single-instrument gains toward orchestrated workflows that integrate automated component extraction, centrifugation, and temperature-aware storage systems, thereby reducing manual handling and variability. Second, safety technologies such as leukoreduction, irradiation, and pathogen inactivation are becoming embedded earlier in processing pathways to reduce downstream risk and support broader clinical use cases. Third, software-enabled process governance is maturing, with temperature monitoring and blood establishment systems providing auditability and compliance support that used to rely on manual recordkeeping.

These shifts are complemented by evolving end-user expectations; hospitals and clinics are increasingly demanding modular systems that can scale with changing case mixes and regulatory requirements. Research and biomanufacturing applications are driving adaptations in processing and storage capabilities to support plasma-derived therapies and novel biologic workflows. Finally, the interplay between disposables and capital equipment is changing procurement models, encouraging suppliers to present lifecycle propositions rather than standalone product sales. Together, these transformative shifts necessitate that clinical, operational, and purchasing leaders rethink supplier relationships, maintenance models, and integration strategies to capture the full value of technological advances.

A clear analysis of how cumulative tariff measures have reshaped procurement dynamics, supplier strategies, and operational resilience across the blood preparation value chain

Recent tariff actions have introduced a material layer of complexity into procurement and supply resilience across the blood preparation value chain. Cumulative tariff measures on imported components, capital equipment, and certain consumables have increased the total cost of ownership for institutions reliant on cross-border suppliers, prompting many organizations to reassess supplier concentration and lead times. As a result, procurement teams are prioritizing dual-sourcing strategies and closer collaboration with regional manufacturers to mitigate exposure to trade policy volatility.

Operationally, tariffs have affected decisions around capital replacement cycles and servicing contracts for items such as apheresis machines, pathogen reduction systems, and temperature-sensitive storage equipment. Institutions that had planned synchronized upgrades are reconsidering schedules to avoid short-term price escalations while continuing to manage compliance and safety imperatives. On the supplier side, manufacturers are responding with localized manufacturing investments, regional distribution hubs, and revised commercial models that emphasize bundled service agreements to offset tariff-driven margins. In parallel, regulatory and customs processing requirements associated with tariff regimes are demanding greater documentation and logistics lead time, which influences blood bank inventory strategies and the timing of elective procedures that depend on reliable transfusion support.

Essential segmentation insights that map offerings, processing methods, clinical applications, automation levels, components, and end-user demands to procurement and innovation priorities

Segmentation drives both product development roadmaps and procurement choices because end users require clarity on how offerings map to clinical and operational needs. Based on offerings, the market encompasses Disposables & Consumables, Equipment, and Software. Disposables & Consumables include items such as apheresis kits, blood bag systems, leukocyte reduction filters, transfer sets, and tubing and needles that determine per-procedure cost and margin for blood centers and hospitals. Equipment comprises collection devices, irradiators, pathogen reduction systems, processing equipment, and storage equipment; collection devices further break down into apheresis machines and blood collection mixers, processing equipment includes automated component extractors and centrifuges, and storage equipment captures blood bank refrigerators, cryogenic freezers, plasma freezers, and platelet incubators and agitators. Software covers blood establishment solutions and temperature monitoring platforms that enable inventory control and regulatory traceability.

Based on component, segmentation differentiates plasma, platelets, red blood cells, and whole blood, each with distinct processing, storage, and clinical utilization profiles. Based on processing automation, offerings span fully automated systems, manual workflows, and semi-automated solutions, which influence staffing models and throughput. Based on preparation method, the range includes apheresis processing, extraction workflows, freezing and cryopreservation, irradiation, leukoreduction, pathogen inactivation, washing and volume adjustment, and whole blood processing, each requiring specific consumables and equipment footprints. Based on application, the market addresses plasma-derived therapies, research and biomanufacturing, and transfusion support; plasma-derived therapies further subdivide into autoimmune and neurologic disorders, liver disease and critical care, and primary immunodeficiency, while transfusion support addresses anemia management, cardiovascular and transplant care, hematological disorders, obstetrics and gynecology, and oncology treatments. Finally, based on end user, demand channels include ambulatory surgical centers, blood banks, clinics, and hospitals, with each end user imposing different scale and compliance requirements that affect product selection and service needs.

A nuanced regional intelligence synthesis describing how Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics influence adoption, supply resilience, and regulatory compliance

Regional dynamics exert substantial influence on supply chains, regulatory expectations, and adoption timelines for new blood preparation technologies. The Americas context features a mix of large established blood service infrastructures, advanced hospital systems, and an increasing focus on automation and safety technologies. In this environment, procurement decisions are influenced by reimbursement frameworks, established supplier relationships, and the logistical realities of long-distance distribution for temperature-sensitive products.

Europe, the Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous tableau where high-regulation markets drive early adoption of compliance-oriented software and pathogen reduction technologies, while emerging markets in the region prioritize scalable, cost-effective disposables and resilient storage solutions. Adoption patterns in this region are mediated by national blood service models and regional trade dynamics. The Asia-Pacific region is characterized by rapid capacity expansion in both hospital services and plasma collection infrastructure, a growing appetite for localized manufacturing to reduce import dependency, and increasing investment in automation and digital quality systems. Across all regions, the interplay between local regulatory frameworks, tariff influences, and healthcare delivery models shapes how quickly new equipment and processes are validated and scaled.

Actionable corporate-level intelligence on how supplier strategies, service models, and partnership approaches are shaping competitive advantage across the blood preparation ecosystem

Competitive dynamics in the blood preparation space are defined less by single-product dominance and more by ecosystem positioning. Leading players differentiate through comprehensive portfolios that combine disposables, capital equipment, and software capabilities, enabling end-to-end value propositions that address procurement preference for fewer vendor interfaces and predictable lifecycle costs. Strategic behaviors observed among major suppliers include forming partnerships with clinical networks to validate new processing technologies, investing in regional service footprints to shorten maintenance lead times, and offering training and accreditation programs that lower implementation friction for sophisticated equipment.

Smaller specialized suppliers are carving sustainable niches by focusing on high-margin consumables, modular add-ons for pathogen reduction, and software modules that integrate with legacy blood establishment systems. Contract manufacturing organizations and regional device assemblers have been expanding capabilities to serve localized demand, particularly where tariff pressures incentivize domestic sourcing. Across the competitive spectrum, successful companies are aligning commercial models to emphasize bundled service agreements, data-enabled support offerings, and interoperability that eases integration with existing blood center workflows.

Practical and prioritized recommendations for suppliers, health systems, and procurement leaders to strengthen resilience, safety, and technology integration in blood preparation

Industry leaders should prioritize a portfolio of strategic actions that directly address supply resilience, safety, and integration. First, adopt a modular procurement strategy that balances capital investment in collection and storage equipment with long-term agreements for disposables and maintenance to stabilize total cost of ownership and reduce exposure to tariff-driven price shocks. Second, accelerate integration of software for blood establishment and temperature monitoring to create transparent, auditable workflows that reduce manual error and support regulatory compliance.

Third, diversify supplier relationships by qualifying regional manufacturers and contract assemblers to shorten lead times and create buffer capacity for critical consumables. Fourth, invest in phased automation that aligns with staffing realities; prioritize semi-automated interventions that deliver immediate reductions in handling risk while planning for fully automated workflows where throughput and budget permit. Fifth, create clinical-laboratory partnerships to validate pathogen reduction and leukoreduction protocols in real-world settings, generating internal evidence that supports broader adoption and payer conversations. Finally, engage proactively with policymakers and customs authorities to streamline import documentation and advocate for tariff treatment that recognizes the clinical imperative of uninterrupted blood supply.

A robust, multi-method research framework combining primary stakeholder interviews, secondary technical and regulatory synthesis, and triangulated thematic validation to underpin strategic insights

The analysis underpinning this executive summary combines a multi-method research approach designed to produce actionable, evidence-based insights. Secondary source synthesis drew on peer-reviewed literature, regulatory guidance, technical standards, and manufacturer technical specifications to build a comprehensive picture of technologies, processes, and compliance requirements. Primary research was conducted through structured interviews with blood bank directors, hospital transfusion leads, procurement professionals, clinical pathologists, and device engineers to surface real-world constraints and adoption drivers.

Data triangulation integrated qualitative interview findings with product feature mappings, supply chain case studies, and regional regulatory reviews to validate themes and identify divergence across regions and end-user types. Segmentation logic was applied iteratively to ensure that offerings, components, processing automation levels, preparation methods, applications, and end users were coherently aligned to observed purchasing behavior and clinical workflows. Where appropriate, scenario analysis was used to stress-test procurement and operational responses to tariff shifts and supply disruptions without attempting to estimate market sizes or forecast quantitative outcomes.

A decisive synthesis of strategic priorities and operational adjustments that unify safety, resilience, and integration as the central imperatives for blood preparation stakeholders

The findings converge on a clear imperative: institutions and suppliers must move from transactional interactions to integrated value partnerships that combine resilient sourcing, automation, and data-enabled quality systems. Providers should view investments in processing automation, pathogen mitigation, and software governance not merely as capital projects but as strategic enablers of clinical consistency and supply resilience. Suppliers who offer modular, service-rich, and interoperable solutions will be best positioned to meet the nuanced demands of diverse end users from ambulatory surgical centers to large hospital networks.

At the same time, procurement teams must adopt a more dynamic risk posture that accounts for tariff volatility and regional manufacturing shifts. By aligning clinical validation programs with procurement cycles and engaging in active supplier qualification, organizations can shorten time-to-adoption for high-value technologies while safeguarding continuity of supply. The conclusions here are intended to guide pragmatic decisions that improve patient safety, operational reliability, and cost transparency across the blood preparation lifecycle.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Blood Preparation Market, by Offerings

  • 8.1. Disposables & Consumables
    • 8.1.1. Apheresis Kits
    • 8.1.2. Blood Bag Systems
    • 8.1.3. Leukocyte Reduction Filters
    • 8.1.4. Transfer Sets
    • 8.1.5. Tubing & Needles
  • 8.2. Equipment
    • 8.2.1. Collection Devices
      • 8.2.1.1. Apheresis Machines
      • 8.2.1.2. Blood Collection Mixers
    • 8.2.2. Irradiators
    • 8.2.3. Pathogen Reduction Systems
    • 8.2.4. Processing Equipment
      • 8.2.4.1. Automated Component Extractors
      • 8.2.4.2. Centrifuges
    • 8.2.5. Storage Equipment
      • 8.2.5.1. Blood Bank Refrigerators
      • 8.2.5.2. Cryogenic Freezers
      • 8.2.5.3. Plasma Freezers
      • 8.2.5.4. Platelet Incubators & Agitators
  • 8.3. Software
    • 8.3.1. Blood Establishment
    • 8.3.2. Temperature Monitoring

9. Blood Preparation Market, by Component

  • 9.1. Plasma
  • 9.2. Platelets
  • 9.3. Red Blood Cells
  • 9.4. Whole Blood

10. Blood Preparation Market, by Processing Automation

  • 10.1. Fully Automated
  • 10.2. Manual
  • 10.3. Semi-Automated

11. Blood Preparation Market, by Preparation Method

  • 11.1. Apheresis Processing
  • 11.2. Extraction Workflow
  • 11.3. Freezing & Cryopreservation
  • 11.4. Irradiation
  • 11.5. Leukoreduction
  • 11.6. Pathogen Inactivation
  • 11.7. Washing & Volume Adjustment
  • 11.8. Whole Blood Processing

12. Blood Preparation Market, by Application

  • 12.1. Plasma-Derived Therapies
    • 12.1.1. Autoimmune & Neurologic Disorders
    • 12.1.2. Liver Disease & Critical Care
    • 12.1.3. Primary Immunodeficiency
  • 12.2. Research & Biomanufacturing
  • 12.3. Transfusion Support
    • 12.3.1. Anemia Management
    • 12.3.2. Cardiovascular & Transplant
    • 12.3.3. Hematological Disorders
    • 12.3.4. Obstetrics & Gynecology
    • 12.3.5. Oncology Treatments

13. Blood Preparation Market, by End User

  • 13.1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • 13.2. Blood Banks
  • 13.3. Clinics
  • 13.4. Hospitals

14. Blood Preparation Market, by Region

  • 14.1. Americas
    • 14.1.1. North America
    • 14.1.2. Latin America
  • 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 14.2.1. Europe
    • 14.2.2. Middle East
    • 14.2.3. Africa
  • 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. Blood Preparation Market, by Group

  • 15.1. ASEAN
  • 15.2. GCC
  • 15.3. European Union
  • 15.4. BRICS
  • 15.5. G7
  • 15.6. NATO

16. Blood Preparation Market, by Country

  • 16.1. United States
  • 16.2. Canada
  • 16.3. Mexico
  • 16.4. Brazil
  • 16.5. United Kingdom
  • 16.6. Germany
  • 16.7. France
  • 16.8. Russia
  • 16.9. Italy
  • 16.10. Spain
  • 16.11. China
  • 16.12. India
  • 16.13. Japan
  • 16.14. Australia
  • 16.15. South Korea

17. United States Blood Preparation Market

18. China Blood Preparation Market

19. Competitive Landscape

  • 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 19.5. Abbott Laboratories
  • 19.6. AdvaCare Pharma
  • 19.7. AstraZeneca PLC
  • 19.8. B. Braun Melsungen AG
  • 19.9. Baxter International Inc.
  • 19.10. Bayer AG
  • 19.11. Becton, Dickinson, and Company
  • 19.12. Cardinal Health
  • 19.13. CSL Limited
  • 19.14. Daiichi Sankyo
  • 19.15. Delcon SRL
  • 19.16. Exelint International, Co.
  • 19.17. Fresenius Kabi AG
  • 19.18. GlaxoSmithKline PLC
  • 19.19. Greiner Bio-One International GmbH
  • 19.20. Grifols, S.A.
  • 19.21. GVS S.p.A.
  • 19.22. Immucor, Inc.
  • 19.23. Kedrion Holding S.p.A.
  • 19.24. Labotronics Scientific LTD.
  • 19.25. Labtron Equipment Ltd
  • 19.26. LFB SA
  • 19.27. Macopharma S.A.S.
  • 19.28. Medline Industries, Inc.
  • 19.29. Medtronic PLC
  • 19.30. Mitra Industries Private Limited
  • 19.31. Nipro Corporation
  • 19.32. Octapharma AG
  • 19.33. Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Inc.
  • 19.34. Pfizer Inc.
  • 19.35. QIAGEN N.V
  • 19.36. Sanquin
  • 19.37. SARSTEDT AG & Co. KG
  • 19.38. Shanghai Kohope Medical Devices Co., Ltd.
  • 19.39. Terumo Corporation
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제