시장보고서
상품코드
2081955

유전자 치료 시장 : 벡터 유형, 치료 유형, 표적 유전체, 전달 방식, 투여 경로, 환자 유형, 치료 영역, 최종 사용자별 - 세계 시장 예측(2026-2032년)

Gene Therapy Market by Vector Type, Therapy Type, Target Genome, Delivery Mode, Route of Administration, Patient Type, Therapeutic Area, End-User - Global Forecast 2026-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 구분자 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 193 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

가격
PDF, Excel & 1 Year Online Access (1-5 Users License) help
PDF & Excel 보고서를 동일 기업내 5명까지 이용할 수 있는 라이선스입니다. 텍스트 등의 복사 및 붙여넣기, 인쇄가 가능합니다. 온라인 플랫폼에서 1년 동안 보고서를 무제한으로 다운로드할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라, 정기적으로 업데이트되는 정보에 접근할 수 있습니다.
US $ 3,939 금액 안내 화살표 ₩ 5,893,000
PDF, Excel & 1 Year Online Access (Enterprise User License) help
PDF & Excel 보고서를 동일 기업의 전 세계 모든 분이 이용할 수 있는 라이선스입니다. 텍스트 등의 복사 및 붙여넣기, 인쇄가 가능합니다. 온라인 플랫폼에서 1년 동안 보고서를 무제한으로 다운로드할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라, 정기적으로 업데이트되는 정보에 접근할 수 있습니다.
US $ 5,959 금액 안내 화살표 ₩ 8,916,000
※ 부가세 별도
한글목차
영문목차

유전자 치료 시장은 2032년까지 연평균 복합 성장률(CAGR) 28.80%로 성장해 759억 2,000만 달러 규모로 확대될 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도(2025년) 129억 1,000만 달러
추정 연도(2026년) 163억 5,000만 달러
예측 연도(2032년) 759억 2,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 28.80%

유전자 치료는 고도로 전문화된 연구 분야에서 희귀질환, 종양학, 혈액학, 안과, 신경학 및 유전성 대사 이상증에 대한 임상적으로 입증된 치료 모델로 점차 전환되고 있습니다. 이 분야는 아데노연관바이러스(AAV) 벡터, 렌티바이러스 벡터, 유전체 편집 기법 등, 승인된 생체 내(in vivo) 및 생체 외(ex vivo) 치료법의 기반이 확대되고 있는 데 힘입고 있습니다. 망막 이영양증 치료, 척수성 근위축증 치료, 여러 가지 CAR-T 세포 치료법, 그리고 겸상적혈구증 및 수혈 의존성 베타 지중해 빈혈에 대한 최초의 CRISPR 기반 치료법의 승인을 포함한 규제상의 이정표 덕분에, 장기적인 치료 가능성에 대한 신뢰가 높아지고 있습니다.

수요는 높은 미충족 의료 수요, 유전자 진단율 향상, 희귀질환 치료제(오펀 드럭)에 대한 우대 조치, 신생아 선별검사의 확대, 그리고 더욱 광범위한 임상 파이프라인에 의해 형성되고 있습니다. 한편, 유전자 치료는 전문적인 제조, 콜드체인 물류, 장기적인 사후 관리, 가치 기반 보험 급여, 그리고 엄격한 안전성 모니터링이 필요하기 때문에 상용화는 여전히 복잡한 과제로 남아 있습니다. 임상적 근거, 확장 가능한 생산, 환자 접근 전략, 그리고 규제 준수를 통합할 수 있는 조직이야말로 유전자 치료 산업의 다음 단계를 주도할 위치에 있다고 할 수 있습니다.

유전자 치료의 전망에 있어 획기적인 변화

유전자 치료의 현황은 단일 제품의 획기적인 발전에서 플랫폼형 개발로의 전환을 통해 변화하고 있습니다. 각 후원사는 검증된 벡터, 모듈식 제조 공정 및 질환 분야에 대한 전문 지식을 점점 더 적극적으로 활용하여, 관련 적응증 전반에 걸친 프로그램을 가속화하고 있습니다. 이러한 변화로 인해 임상 개발의 효율성이 향상되는 한편, 지속성, 안전성, 재현성에 대한 기대도 높아지고 있습니다.

유전자 치료 분야에서 인공지능이 미치는 누적 영향

인공지능(AI)은 표적 선정, 벡터 설계, 배열 최적화, 환자 계층화 및 임상시험 설계를 개선함으로써 유전자 치료의 전체 밸류체인에 누적적인 가치를 창출하고 있습니다. AI를 활용한 모델은 유전체, 트랜스크립토-ム, 프로테오-ム, 영상, 안전성 및 실세계 데이터 세트를 분석하여 질병의 기전을 규명하는 동시에, 보다 탄탄한 생물학적 근거를 갖춘 치료 후보를 우선적으로 선정할 수 있습니다.

지역별 주요 인사이트 : 지역별 유전자 치료 도입 현황

북미는 생명공학 분야에 대한 풍부한 자금 조달, 선진적인 대학 부속 의료 센터, 확립된 희귀질환 지원 네트워크, 신속 승인 절차에 관한 규제상의 경험, 그리고 견고한 위탁 개발·제조 기관(CDMO) 기반을 바탕으로 유전자 치료 혁신 분야에서 계속해서 선도적인 지역으로 자리매김하고 있습니다. 미국은 임상시험, 규제 당국의 승인, 그리고 상용화를 통해 이 분야의 활동을 주도하고 있는 반면, 캐나다는 연구 네트워크, 세포 및 유전자 치료제 제조 이니셔티브, 그리고 희귀질환 정책 수립을 통해 기여하고 있습니다.

주요 그룹별 인사이트 : 전략적 유전자 치료 시장 부문

아세안 지역은 싱가포르, 태국, 말레이시아 등 시장에서 병원 인프라 개선, 희귀질환에 대한 인식 제고, 유전자 검사 능력 향상, 그리고 의료 관광의 확대를 통해 유전자 치료 성장의 핵심 축으로 부상하고 있습니다. 그러나 보험 환급 제도의 성숙도, 현지 제조 체계의 충실도, 그리고 첨단 치료에 관한 규제 조화는 여전히 지역마다 차이가 있어, 치료 접근성을 확보하기 위해서는 지역 간 파트너십과 ‘센터 오브 엑설런스’ 모델이 필수적입니다.

주요 국가에 대한 인사이트 : 우선순위가 높은 유전자 치료 시장

미국은 확고한 규제 선례, 광범위한 임상시험 활동, 전문 치료 센터, 희귀질환 지원 활동, 그리고 막대한 생명공학 자금 조달을 바탕으로 상업적으로 가장 발전된 유전자 치료 시장으로 자리매김하고 있습니다. 캐나다는 연구 및 제조 역량을 강화하는 한편, 각 주별 보험 환급 제도와 국가 차원의 희귀질환 대책 이니셔티브를 통해 치료 접근성 향상에 힘쓰고 있습니다. 멕시코와 브라질은 라틴아메리카의 주요 시장이며, 브라질은 이 지역에서 가장 탄탄한 임상 연구 및 규제 기반을 갖추고 있습니다. 한편, 양국 모두 치료비 부담 경감, 진료 의뢰 경로, 유전자 검사 이용 가능성, 그리고 전문 치료 센터의 체계 구축에 계속해서 힘쓰고 있습니다.

유전자 치료 업계의 리더를 위한 실천적 제안

업계 리더는 개발 초기 단계부터 벡터 공정 최적화, 분석적 검증, 효능 측정 전략, 주요 원료의 이중 조달 전략 등 확장 가능한 제조 체계를 우선시해야 합니다. 품질의 비교 가능성, 배치 간 일관성, 출하 검사의 신뢰성은 규제 당국에 대한 신청 일정 및 상용화 준비 상황에 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 화학·제조·품질 관리(CMC)에 관한 탄탄한 계획이 필수적입니다.

조사 방법

본 조사 기법은 규제 정보, 임상시험 분석, 공개 정보, 과학 문헌, 특허 동향, 보험 급여 제도 동향 및 지역별 의료 인프라 평가를 결합한 ‘삼각측량형’ 접근법을 활용하여 수립되었습니다. 우선적으로 참조하는 정보 출처에는 공공 규제 데이터베이스, 동료 심사를 거친 논문, 의료 기술 평가(HTA) 문서, 공개 문서, 치료 지침, 공인된 임상시험 등록 기관 및 정부의 보건 정책 문서가 포함됩니다.

결론 : 유전자 치료의 전략적 전망

과학적 검증, 규제 당국과의 협력 실적, 그리고 환자 수요가 맞물리면서 유전자 치료는 결정적인 성장 단계에 접어들고 있습니다. 이 업계의 차세대 리더는 획기적인 생물학적 연구와 제조 가능성, 안전성, 지속적인 치료 효과, 그리고 신뢰할 수 있는 보험 급여 근거를 모두 갖춘 기업이 될 것입니다.

자주 묻는 질문

  • 유전자 치료 시장 규모는 어떻게 예측되나요?
  • 유전자 치료의 주요 치료 분야는 무엇인가요?
  • 유전자 치료의 상용화에 있어 주요 도전 과제는 무엇인가요?
  • 인공지능이 유전자 치료에 미치는 영향은 무엇인가요?
  • 북미 지역의 유전자 치료 시장의 특징은 무엇인가요?
  • 아세안 지역에서 유전자 치료의 성장 요인은 무엇인가요?
  • 유전자 치료 업계의 리더에게 필요한 전략은 무엇인가요?

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 AI의 누적 영향(2026년)

제7장 유전자 치료 시장 : 벡터 유형별

제8장 유전자 치료 시장 : 요법 유형별

제9장 유전자 치료 시장 : 표적 유전체별

제10장 유전자 치료 시장 : 유통 모드별

제11장 유전자 치료 시장 : 투여 경로별

제12장 유전자 치료 시장 : 환자 유형별

제13장 유전자 치료 시장 : 치료 영역별

제14장 유전자 치료 시장 : 최종 사용자별

제15장 유전자 치료 시장 : 지역별

제16장 유전자 치료 시장 : 그룹별

제17장 유전자 치료 시장 : 국가별

제18장 경쟁 구도

제19장 기업 개요

KTH 26.07.14

The Gene Therapy Market is projected to grow by USD 75.92 billion at a CAGR of 28.80% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 12.91 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 16.35 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 75.92 billion
CAGR (%) 28.80%

Gene therapy is moving from a highly specialized research field into a clinically validated treatment model for rare diseases, oncology, hematology, ophthalmology, neurology, and inherited metabolic disorders. The field is supported by a growing base of approved in vivo and ex vivo therapies, including adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors, lentiviral vectors, and genome-editing approaches. Regulatory milestones, including approvals of retinal dystrophy therapy, spinal muscular atrophy therapy, multiple CAR-T cell therapies, and the first CRISPR-based therapy for sickle cell disease and transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia, have strengthened confidence in long-term therapeutic potential.

Demand is being shaped by high unmet medical need, increasing genetic diagnosis rates, orphan drug incentives, newborn screening expansion, and broader clinical pipelines. At the same time, commercialization remains complex because gene therapy requires specialized manufacturing, cold-chain logistics, long-term follow-up, value-based reimbursement, and rigorous safety monitoring. Organizations that can integrate clinical evidence, scalable production, patient access strategy, and regulatory alignment are positioned to lead the next phase of the gene therapy industry.

Transformative Shifts in the Gene Therapy Landscape

The gene therapy landscape is being transformed by the transition from single-product breakthroughs to platform-based development. Sponsors are increasingly using validated vectors, modular manufacturing processes, and disease-area expertise to accelerate programs across related indications. This shift is improving clinical development efficiency while raising expectations for durability, safety, and reproducibility.

Manufacturing capacity has become a strategic differentiator. Viral vector supply constraints, quality control requirements, potency assay complexity, and high cost of goods continue to influence launch timelines and access strategies. In parallel, non-viral delivery, lipid nanoparticles, base editing, prime editing, targeted in vivo delivery, and improved capsid engineering are expanding the competitive field beyond traditional viral vector platforms.

The commercial model is also changing. Payers are demanding evidence of long-term clinical benefit, especially for one-time therapies with high upfront treatment costs. As a result, outcomes-based agreements, installment payment models, registries, and real-world evidence programs are becoming central to gene therapy market access strategy.

Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Gene Therapy

Artificial intelligence is creating cumulative value across the gene therapy value chain by improving target identification, vector engineering, sequence optimization, patient stratification, and clinical trial design. AI-enabled models can analyze genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, imaging, safety, and real-world datasets to identify disease mechanisms and prioritize therapeutic candidates with stronger biological rationale.

In development and manufacturing, AI supports process monitoring, predictive quality analytics, assay optimization, deviation detection, and batch-failure reduction. These capabilities are particularly relevant for viral vector production, where yield variability, impurity profiles, and release testing can affect both cost and supply reliability. AI is also being applied to adverse-event signal detection and long-term follow-up analytics, supporting regulatory compliance for therapies that may require monitoring for years after administration.

The impact is cumulative rather than isolated: each dataset generated during discovery, clinical trials, manufacturing, and post-market surveillance improves future decision-making. Organizations with governed data infrastructure, validated models, privacy-compliant data use, and cross-functional AI adoption are likely to shorten development cycles and strengthen evidence generation.

Key Regional Insights: Gene Therapy Adoption by Region

North America remains the leading region for gene therapy innovation, supported by deep biotechnology financing, advanced academic medical centers, established rare disease advocacy networks, regulatory experience with expedited pathways, and a strong base of contract development and manufacturing organizations. The United States anchors regional activity through clinical trials, regulatory approvals, and commercial launches, while Canada contributes through research networks, cell and gene therapy manufacturing initiatives, and rare disease policy development.

Europe is a major hub for advanced therapy medicinal products, with a dedicated ATMP regulatory framework and strong clinical infrastructure across Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Country-specific health technology assessment processes and pricing negotiations can slow patient access after approval, but the region's emphasis on real-world evidence, managed entry agreements, and cross-border scientific collaboration is shaping global reimbursement standards for advanced therapies.

Asia-Pacific is expanding rapidly as China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and ASEAN markets invest in biotechnology infrastructure, clinical trial capacity, genomic medicine, and domestic manufacturing. China has become a major center for cell therapy trials and gene-editing research, while Japan's regenerative medicine framework supports accelerated development pathways and South Korea continues to strengthen biomanufacturing capabilities. Latin America, led by Brazil and Mexico, is building access through specialized centers and regulatory modernization, although affordability, diagnostic coverage, and infrastructure gaps remain important barriers. The Middle East, particularly GCC countries, is investing in precision medicine, genomic screening, and tertiary care, while Africa's opportunity is tied to genomics capacity, diagnostic access, newborn screening, and partnerships addressing high-burden inherited conditions such as hemoglobinopathies.

Key Group Insights: Strategic Gene Therapy Market Blocs

ASEAN is emerging as a growth corridor for gene therapy through improving hospital infrastructure, rising rare disease awareness, increased genetic testing capacity, and medical tourism in markets such as Singapore, Thailand, and Malaysia. However, reimbursement maturity, local manufacturing depth, and advanced therapy regulatory harmonization remain uneven, making regional partnerships and centers-of-excellence models critical for access.

The GCC is prioritizing precision medicine, genomic screening, and high-acuity specialty care, particularly in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar. These markets are well positioned to adopt advanced therapies through centralized health systems, national transformation programs, and investment in specialty hospitals, but long-term follow-up systems, outcomes tracking, and cost-management frameworks are essential for sustainable uptake.

The European Union provides one of the most structured regulatory environments through the ATMP framework, while joint clinical assessment under evolving EU health technology assessment rules is expected to influence evidence expectations and access planning. BRICS countries represent a large long-term opportunity due to population scale, genetic disease burden, expanding clinical research, and increasing domestic biotech investment, though access varies widely by healthcare financing model and specialist infrastructure. G7 countries continue to dominate approvals, clinical development, manufacturing quality systems, and reimbursement innovation, while NATO member markets overlap significantly with advanced healthcare systems investing in supply-chain resilience, biosecurity, health security, and domestic advanced therapy manufacturing.

Key Country Insights: Priority Gene Therapy Markets

The United States is the most commercially advanced gene therapy market, with strong regulatory precedent, broad clinical trial activity, specialized treatment centers, rare disease advocacy, and significant biotechnology financing. Canada is strengthening research and manufacturing capacity while addressing access through provincial reimbursement pathways and national rare disease policy initiatives. Mexico and Brazil are important Latin American markets, with Brazil offering the region's strongest clinical research and regulatory base, while both countries continue to address affordability, referral pathways, genetic testing availability, and specialized treatment-center capacity.

In Europe, the United Kingdom combines scientific leadership with an innovative medicines environment and strong genomic medicine infrastructure, while Germany and France are central to clinical adoption, pricing negotiations, hospital-based delivery, and health technology assessment influence. Italy and Spain have strong specialist networks and experience with managed access for advanced therapies. Russia has scientific capabilities in biomedical research, but geopolitical, regulatory, and supply-chain factors influence international collaboration and access to advanced therapy inputs.

China is one of the most active gene therapy and cell therapy development markets, supported by large patient populations, domestic biotechnology investment, expanding regulatory maturity, and growing hospital-based clinical trial capacity. India offers long-term potential through genetic disease burden, cost-efficient manufacturing, improving genomic diagnostics, and a growing biotech sector. Japan provides a favorable environment for regenerative medicine and advanced therapies, South Korea is investing heavily in biomanufacturing and translational research, and Australia contributes through clinical trial excellence, hospital networks, rare disease programs, and government-supported medical research.

Actionable Recommendations for Gene Therapy Industry Leaders

Industry leaders should prioritize scalable manufacturing early in development, including vector process optimization, analytical validation, potency assay strategy, and dual-sourcing strategies for critical raw materials. Robust chemistry, manufacturing, and controls planning is essential because quality comparability, batch consistency, and release testing reliability can determine regulatory timelines and commercial readiness.

Market access should be built into the clinical strategy rather than added after approval. Sponsors need endpoints that demonstrate durable patient benefit, registries that support long-term evidence generation, and payer engagement models that address high upfront therapy costs. Outcomes-based reimbursement, staged payments, annuity-style models, and risk-sharing agreements should be evaluated where legally and operationally feasible.

Organizations should also invest in AI-enabled data infrastructure, decentralized patient identification, genetic testing partnerships, newborn screening alignment, and centers-of-excellence networks. These capabilities improve trial recruitment, shorten diagnostic delays, and support safe administration in real-world settings. Strategic alliances with academic institutions, manufacturing partners, diagnostic providers, patient organizations, and regional health systems can accelerate responsible global expansion.

Research Methodology

The research methodology is developed using a triangulated research approach that combines regulatory intelligence, clinical trial analysis, public disclosures, scientific literature, patent trends, reimbursement developments, and regional healthcare infrastructure assessment. Priority sources include public regulatory databases, peer-reviewed publications, health technology assessment documents, public filings, treatment guidelines, recognized clinical trial registries, and government healthcare policy documents.

The methodology emphasizes verified and current evidence rather than speculative market claims. Insights are cross-checked across multiple source categories to evaluate approval momentum, pipeline direction, technology adoption, manufacturing constraints, patient access dynamics, and safety monitoring requirements. Regional, group, and country assessments consider regulatory maturity, financing capacity, treatment-center infrastructure, genetic testing availability, long-term follow-up systems, and policy support for advanced therapies.

Conclusion: Strategic Outlook for Gene Therapy

Gene therapy is entering a decisive growth phase as scientific validation, regulatory experience, and patient demand converge. The industry's next leaders will be those that combine breakthrough biology with manufacturability, safety, durable outcomes, and credible reimbursement evidence.

Artificial intelligence, next-generation delivery systems, genomic diagnostics, and global manufacturing investment are expected to reshape development productivity and access. However, the sector must continue to address affordability, long-term monitoring, equitable patient identification, and scalable delivery through qualified treatment centers. For industry leaders, the strategic priority is clear: build integrated platforms that connect discovery, manufacturing, clinical evidence, safety surveillance, and market access from the earliest stages of development.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Market Dynamics
    • 4.3.1. Key Drivers
    • 4.3.2. Key Restraints
    • 4.3.3. Key Opportunities
    • 4.3.4. Key Challenges
  • 4.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.5. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.6. Market Outlook
    • 4.6.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.6.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.6.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.7. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2026

7. Gene Therapy Market, by Vector Type

  • 7.1. Non-Viral Vectors
    • 7.1.1. Lipofection
    • 7.1.2. Plasmid DNA
  • 7.2. Viral Vectors
    • 7.2.1. Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) Vectors
    • 7.2.2. Adenovirus Vectors
    • 7.2.3. Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Vectors
    • 7.2.4. Retrovirus Vectors

8. Gene Therapy Market, by Therapy Type

  • 8.1. Gene Replacement Therapy
  • 8.2. Gene Silencing Therapy
  • 8.3. Gene Editing Therapy
  • 8.4. Gene Augmentation Therapy
  • 8.5. Cell-Based Gene Therapy

9. Gene Therapy Market, by Target Genome

  • 9.1. DNA Modification
  • 9.2. RNA Modification

10. Gene Therapy Market, by Delivery Mode

  • 10.1. Ex Vivo
  • 10.2. In Vivo

11. Gene Therapy Market, by Route of Administration

  • 11.1. Intramuscular
  • 11.2. Intraocular
  • 11.3. Intravenous

12. Gene Therapy Market, by Patient Type

  • 12.1. Adult Patients
  • 12.2. Pediatric Patients

13. Gene Therapy Market, by Therapeutic Area

  • 13.1. Cardiovascular Diseases
    • 13.1.1. Coronary Artery Disease
    • 13.1.2. Heart Failure
  • 13.2. Infectious Diseases
    • 13.2.1. Hepatitis B
    • 13.2.2. HIV
  • 13.3. Monogenic Disorders
    • 13.3.1. Cystic Fibrosis
    • 13.3.2. Hemophilia
    • 13.3.3. Sickle Cell Anemia
  • 13.4. Oncological Disorders
    • 13.4.1. Hematological Malignancies
    • 13.4.2. Solid Tumors

14. Gene Therapy Market, by End-User

  • 14.1. Contract Research Organizations
  • 14.2. Hospitals & Clinics
  • 14.3. Pharmaceutical & Biotech Companies
  • 14.4. Research Institutes

15. Gene Therapy Market, by Region

  • 15.1. Asia-Pacific
  • 15.2. North America
  • 15.3. Latin America
  • 15.4. Europe
  • 15.5. Middle East
  • 15.6. Africa

16. Gene Therapy Market, by Group

  • 16.1. ASEAN
  • 16.2. GCC
  • 16.3. European Union
  • 16.4. BRICS
  • 16.5. G7
  • 16.6. NATO

17. Gene Therapy Market, by Country

  • 17.1. United States
  • 17.2. Canada
  • 17.3. Mexico
  • 17.4. Brazil
  • 17.5. United Kingdom
  • 17.6. Germany
  • 17.7. France
  • 17.8. Russia
  • 17.9. Italy
  • 17.10. Spain
  • 17.11. China
  • 17.12. India
  • 17.13. Japan
  • 17.14. Australia
  • 17.15. South Korea

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025

19. Company Profiles

  • 19.1. Abeona Therapeutics Inc.
  • 19.2. Adaptimmune Therapeutics PLC
  • 19.3. Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc.
  • 19.4. AGC Biologics
  • 19.5. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • 19.6. American Gene Technologies Inc.
  • 19.7. Amgen Inc.
  • 19.8. AnGes, Inc.
  • 19.9. Astellas Pharma Inc.
  • 19.10. Biogen Inc.
  • 19.11. bluebird bio, Inc.
  • 19.12. Cellectis S.A.
  • 19.13. CRISPR Therapeutics AG
  • 19.14. Danaher Corporation
  • 19.15. Editas Medicine, Inc.
  • 19.16. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
  • 19.17. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  • 19.18. Intellia Therapeutics
  • 19.19. Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • 19.20. Johnson & Johnson
  • 19.21. Merck KGaA
  • 19.22. Mustang Bio, Inc.
  • 19.23. Novartis AG
  • 19.24. Orchard Therapeutics PLC
  • 19.25. Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.
  • 19.26. Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc.
  • 19.27. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
  • 19.28. Sibiono GeneTech Co. Ltd.
  • 19.29. Syncona Limited
  • 19.30. ViGeneron GmbH
  • 19.31. Voyager Therapeutics Inc.
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제
문의
원하시는 정보를
찾아 드릴까요?
문의주시면 필요한 정보를
신속하게 찾아드릴게요.
02-2025-2992
email
문의하기