공지 : 도쿄증권거래소 JASDAQ 스탠다드 시장 신규 상장 관련 안내

Global Information
회사소개 | 문의 | 비교리스트

마이크로 LED 디스플레이(2021-2031년) : 기술, 상업화, 기회, 시장, 기업

Micro-LED Displays 2021-2031: Technology, Commercialization, Opportunity, Market and Players

리서치사 IDTechEx Ltd.
발행일 2021년 04월 상품 코드 1000688
페이지 정보 영문 668 Slides
가격
US $ 5,995 ₩ 6,758,000 PDF Download (1-5 Users) help
5명까지 액세스 권한이 부여되는 라이선스입니다. 텍스트 등의 PDF 내용 편집은 불가능합니다. 인쇄횟수에 제한은 없으나, 인쇄물의 이용 범위는 PDF 이용 범위에 준합니다.
US $ 8,495 ₩ 9,576,000 PDF Download (6-10 Users) help
10명까지 액세스 권한이 부여되는 라이선스입니다. 텍스트 등의 PDF 내용 편집은 불가능합니다. 인쇄횟수에 제한은 없으나, 인쇄물의 이용 범위는 PDF 이용 범위에 준합니다.


마이크로 LED 디스플레이(2021-2031년) : 기술, 상업화, 기회, 시장, 기업 Micro-LED Displays 2021-2031: Technology, Commercialization, Opportunity, Market and Players
발행일 : 2021년 04월 페이지 정보 : 영문 668 Slides

본 상품은 영문 자료로 한글과 영문목차에 불일치하는 내용이 있을 경우 영문을 우선합니다. 정확한 검토를 위해 영문목차를 참고해주시기 바랍니다.

지난 2014년 애플이 럭스뷰를 인수한 뒤 마이크로 LED(μLED)는 다양한 업계 플레이어들이 추구하는 발광 디스플레이(Emissive display) 기술로 자리 잡았습니다. 마이크로 LED 디스플레이는 넓은 색상의 가무트, 높은 휘도, 낮은 전력 소비량, 탁월한 안정성과 긴 수명, 넓은 시야각, 높은 동적 범위, 높은 대조도, 빠른 새로 고침 빈도, 투명도, 매끄러운 연결, 센서 통합 능력 등과 같은 가치 제안을 제공합니다.

본 보고서에서는 마이크로 LED의 기술, 시장과 기업의 전망에 대해 심도깊게 분석하였습니다.

목차

1. 주요 요약

2. 마이크로 LED 디스플레이 소개

3. EPITAXY와 칩 제조

4. 이송 및 조립

5. 테스트

6. 결함 관리

7. 마이크로 LED 디스플레이 Full-Color 실현

8. 조명 관리

9. 백플레인과 드라이빙

10. 이미지 품질 개선, 전원 소비 줄이기

11. 미니 LED 디스플레이

12. 비용 분석

13. 시장 분석

14. 파트너십, 인수 및 합병, 조인트벤처

15. 기업분석과 사례연구

JYH 21.04.21

Title:
Micro-LED Displays 2021-2031:
Technology, Commercialization, Opportunity, Market and Players

Micro-LEDs for AR/VR/MR, TVs, automotive, mobile phones, wearables, tables, laptops and large video displays, with analysis of technology, supply chain, market, players and opportunities.

"Challenges and opportunities with the drive to reshuffle the supply chain in the next decade."

After acquisition of LuxVue by Apple in 2014, micro-light emitting diode (MicroLED, or μLED) has become an attracting emissive display technology and pursued by players from various industries. MicroLED displays deliver value propositions such as wide colour gamut, high luminance, low power consumption, excellent stability and long lifetime, wide view angle, high dynamic range, high contrast, fast refresh rate, transparency, seamless connection, sensor integration capability, etc. Some of the value propositions can be provided by alternatives such as LCD, OLED and QD, while one of the strong drivers to develop MicroLED displays are these unique value propositions.

            Value propositions of various display technologies. Source: IDTechEx

The first MicroLED commercial product, the Crystal LED display, was launched by Sony, which replaced the traditional packaged LEDs by MicroLED. These small-pitch LED video displays target the to-B market and both the costs and prices are far more expensive than what already exist. Technology immaturity, cost barriers and supply chain incompletion are three major hurdles in large-scale commercialization for MicroLED displays.

With the existing LED industry and the mature display industry, the emerging mass transfer sector is the link to bridge these two industries, and they together can be the enabler to establish a new supply chain. With the basis that current LCD manufacturing is shifting to China due to cost advantage and South Korea is dominating OLED displays, those who can react quick enough to make an important position in the shaped supply chain will seize the next big opportunity. The game is open to conventional LED suppliers, display vendors, component providers, OEMs, integrators, and also welcomes newcomers that can bring technology innovation, material improvement, equipment support, and business model revolution.

To make strategic decisions, both information and insights are required. These include, but are not limited to, technology limitations and capabilities, market status analysis, supply chain interpretation, player activity tracking, and global trend understanding. This report will tackle these aspects accordingly.

To fabricate a MicroLED display, many technologies and processes are involved, such as epitaxy, photolithography, chip fabrication, substrate removal, inspection, mass transfer, bonding and interconnection, testing, repair, backplane, and drive IC, etc. After years of development, some technology difficulties have been solved, while new challenges are placed in front of us. For instance, several years ago, the major efforts were concentrated in die miniaturization, chip design and mass transfer. Recently, more and more players realize a complete understanding of all the processes is the key. Therefore, an increasing number of people put more effort also on technologies such as inspection, repair, driving, image improvement, light management, and high-volume production equipment. This report provides all the major technology choices with detailed introduction, analysis, and comparison. It also shows what important players have offered to the market, and the technologies behind the prototypes/products. The targeted applications cover from micro-displays such as AR/VR/MR, to consumer middle-sized displays like smart phones, TVs, to huge displays, e.g., large video public displays. The corresponding technologies vary from each other. With a deep understanding of each technology, it is possible to understand where we are and where we can go.

With players holding various technologies, they have different entry markets to target. In this report, we have focused on 9 applications to analyse. They are augmented/mixed reality (AR/MR), virtual reality (VR), large video displays, TVs and monitors, automotive displays, mobile phones, smart watches and wearables, tablets and laptops, and emerging displays. A ten-year market forecast is provided based on shipment unit for each application. In addition, an application roadmap is offered with a consideration of different maturity readiness of each application.

As more and more players are plunging into the MicroLED industry, they gradually choose to work with each other directly or in a large network. Several supply chain clusters are formed based on geography, with cross-continental collaboration increasingly common. We also show regional efforts in the report.

All these collaborations indicate that globalization continues to be our future trend. From the display cycle we also know that we are at the merge & consolidation stage, and lots of activities show us the direction of future trends. However, in the meantime, important international events such as the trade war and COVID-19 make our decisions more difficult, resulting in a more complicated picture. We also discussed their impacts in the report, especially their influence on the supply chain.

Objectives of the report:

Technology assessment

  • Value propositions, benefits and drawbacks compared with competing technologies.
  • Drivers and motivations
  • Current status
  • Technology breakthroughs
  • Technology challenges and roadmap to tackle these issues.
  • Activities of research institutes, universities, and start-ups

Application interpretation

  • Roadmap for display applications
  • How mature and disruptive are micro-LEDs for these applications?
  • What we can expect in the near future

Market landscape, business opportunity and supply chains

  • Cost analysis
  • Impact on the supply chain and identify possible supply chain for micro-LED displays.
  • Market forecast
  • Regional efforts
  • Merges, acquisitions, joint ventures, and partnerships

Players

  • Identify key players, IP owners and emerging start-ups.

Who should read it: Display makers, LED suppliers, material suppliers, R&D organizations, technology providers, OEMs/ODMs, investors, players who are exploring new opportunities.

Analyst access from IDTechEx

All report purchases include up to 30 minutes telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you're addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • 1.1. What is the report about and who should read it?
  • 1.2. Existing large mini-/micro-LED display announcements
  • 1.3. Expectation of future displays
  • 1.4. Status of OLED
  • 1.5. Strategies of QDs in display
  • 1.6. Characteristic comparison of different display technologies
  • 1.7. Horizontal comparison
  • 1.8. Why Micro-LED Displays?
  • 1.9. Micro-LED value propositions compared with LCD, OLED, QD
  • 1.10. Importance of identifying core value propositions
  • 1.11. Core value propositions of μLED displays
  • 1.12. Analysis of micro-LED's value propositions
  • 1.13. Influence of resolution for applications
  • 1.14. Micro-LED display types
  • 1.15. Potential applications for micro-LED displays
  • 1.16. Matrix analysis
  • 1.17. Display requirements for XR applications
  • 1.18. Application analysis: Augmented/mixed reality
  • 1.19. Application analysis: Virtual reality
  • 1.20. Application analysis: Large video displays
  • 1.21. Application analysis: Televisions and monitors
  • 1.22. Application analysis: Automotive displays
  • 1.23. Application analysis: Mobile phones
  • 1.24. Application analysis: Smart watches and wearables
  • 1.25. Application analysis: Tablets and laptop
  • 1.26. Emerging displays enabled by micro-LED technology
  • 1.27. Micro-LED display development stage
  • 1.28. Micro-LED application roadmap
  • 1.29. Micro-LED display fabrication flowchart
  • 1.30. Technologies of micro-LED displays
  • 1.31. Complex micro-LED display design
  • 1.32. Challenge transition for micro-display manufacturing
  • 1.33. Current achievements of micro-LED displays
  • 1.34. Summary of challenges for micro-LED displays
  • 1.35. Issues with RGB micro-LED chips
  • 1.36. Micro-LED performance summary
  • 1.37. Full colour realization
  • 1.38. Quantum dots for μLEDs
  • 1.39. Regional development: Taiwan
  • 1.40. Regional development: Mainland China
  • 1.41. Regional development: Japan & Korea
  • 1.42. Regional development: Europe
  • 1.43. Regional development: US
  • 1.44. Supply chain status
  • 1.45. Supply chain reshuffle
  • 1.46. Possible supply chain for micro-LED displays
  • 1.47. Scenarios of supply chain dominance
  • 1.48. Supply chain influenced by trade war and coronavirus

2. INTRODUCTION TO MICRO-LED DISPLAY

  • 2.1. From traditional LEDs...
  • 2.2. ...to Micro-LEDs
  • 2.3. Comparisons of LEDs for displays
  • 2.4. Mini-LEDs and Micro-LEDs
  • 2.5. Correlations between mini-LED, micro-LED and fine pitch LED displays
  • 2.6. From traditional LEDs to micro-LED
  • 2.7. Display types based on micro-LEDs
  • 2.8. Advantages of AM micro-LED micro-displays
  • 2.9. LED size definitions
  • 2.10. Micro-LED displays: size is an important feature
  • 2.11. Micro LED displays: beyond the size
  • 2.12. A better definition?
  • 2.13. Micro-LED display panel structure

3. EPITAXY AND CHIP MANUFACTURING

  • 3.1. Introduction to light-emitting diodes
    • 3.1.1. History of solid-state lighting
    • 3.1.2. What is an LED?
    • 3.1.3. How does an LED work?
    • 3.1.4. Homojunction vs. heterojunction
    • 3.1.5. LEDs by package technique
    • 3.1.6. Typical LED and packaged LED sizes
    • 3.1.7. Comparison between SMD and COB
    • 3.1.8. COB for displays
    • 3.1.9. List of global major LED companies with introduction
  • 3.2. Epitaxy
    • 3.2.1. Bandgap vs. lattice constant for III-V semiconductors
    • 3.2.2. Materials for commercial LED chips
    • 3.2.3. Green gap
    • 3.2.4. Epitaxy substrate
    • 3.2.5. Wafer patterning
    • 3.2.6. Epitaxy methods
    • 3.2.7. Metal organic chemical vapor deposition
    • 3.2.8. Pros and cons of MOCVD
    • 3.2.9. Epitaxial growth requirement
    • 3.2.10. Offering from Aixtron and Veeco
    • 3.2.11. Veeco's offering
    • 3.2.12. Engineered substrate
    • 3.2.13. Wafer uniformity 1
    • 3.2.14. Wavelength uniformity 2
    • 3.2.15. Solutions for wafer nonuniformity
  • 3.3. Chip manufacturing
    • 3.3.1. LED fabrication flowchart
    • 3.3.2. Typical RGB LED designs
    • 3.3.3. LED chip structures
    • 3.3.4. LED chip structure illustrations
    • 3.3.5. Future of the LED chip structure
    • 3.3.6. Epi-film transfer
    • 3.3.7. Fabrication of vertical GaN-LEDs
  • 3.4. Micro-LED Performances
    • 3.4.1. Influence of micro-LED performance
    • 3.4.2. EQE of micro-LED versus current density
    • 3.4.3. Efficiency droop
    • 3.4.4. Temperature stability
    • 3.4.5. Bowing of wavelength shift
    • 3.4.6. Size dependence of micro-LEDs
    • 3.4.7. Efficiencies and requirement of RGB micro-LEDs
    • 3.4.8. Surface recombination
    • 3.4.9. Sidewall effect
    • 3.4.10. Side wall passivation
    • 3.4.11. Efficiency improvement

4. TRANSFER AND ASSEMBLY

  • 4.1.1. Introduction
  • 4.1.2. Mass transfer and assembly technologies
  • 4.1.3. Requirements of mass transfer
  • 4.1.4. Chiplet mass transfer types
  • 4.2. Chiplet Mass Transfer
    • 4.2.1. Introduction to chiplet mass assembly
    • 4.2.2. Chiplet mass transfer scenario
    • 4.2.3. Comparison of mass transfer technologies
    • 4.2.4. Comparison of transfer technologies of different companies
    • 4.2.5. Transfer yield
    • 4.2.6. Fine pick and place
    • 4.2.7. Overview of Elastomeric stamp
    • 4.2.8. Transfer process flow
    • 4.2.9. Elastomeric stamp: pros and cons
    • 4.2.10. Stamp yield vs. defect density
    • 4.2.11. Key technologies for micro-LED mass transfer
    • 4.2.12. Substrate treatment
    • 4.2.13. Kinetic control of the elastomeric stamp adhesion
    • 4.2.14. Elastomeric stamp
    • 4.2.15. Pitch size determination
    • 4.2.16. X-Celeprint
    • 4.2.17. μLED fabrication
    • 4.2.18. μLEDs from sapphire substrate
    • 4.2.19. Passive matrix displays made by micro-transfer printing
    • 4.2.20. Passive matrix μLED display fabrication
    • 4.2.21. Active matrix displays made by micro-transfer printing
    • 4.2.22. Active matrix μLED display fabrication
    • 4.2.23. Automated micro-transfer printing machinery
    • 4.2.24. Capillary-assisted transfer printing
    • 4.2.25. Mikro Mesa: Transfer technology
    • 4.2.26. Mikro Mesa: Transfer flowchart
    • 4.2.27. Mikro Mesa: Transfer stamp
    • 4.2.28. Mikro Mesa: Transfer design target
    • 4.2.29. PlayNitride: Mass transfer for micro-LED chips
    • 4.2.30. PlayNitride: Mass transfer flowchart
    • 4.2.31. Visionox
    • 4.2.32. ITRI: Chip fabrication
    • 4.2.33. ITRI's mass transfer process
    • 4.2.34. ITRI's transfer module
    • 4.2.35. Overview of electrostatic array
    • 4.2.36. Electrostatic/electromagnetic transfer
    • 4.2.37. Apple/LuxVue
    • 4.2.38. VerLASE's large area assembly platform
    • 4.2.39. Interposer idea
    • 4.2.40. Self-assembly
    • 4.2.41. Introduction of fluidic-assembly
    • 4.2.42. eLux: introduction
    • 4.2.43. Fabrication of micro-LED chip array
    • 4.2.44. eLux's fluidic assembly
    • 4.2.45. eLux's display prototypes
    • 4.2.46. eLux's supply chain
    • 4.2.47. eLux's core patent technology
    • 4.2.48. Image quality comparison
    • 4.2.49. SWOT analysis of eLux's technology
    • 4.2.50. Other fluidic assembly techniques
    • 4.2.51. Fluidic assembly (physical): overview
    • 4.2.52. Alien
    • 4.2.53. Alien's fluidic self-assembly technology
    • 4.2.54. Self-assembly based on shape/geometry matching
    • 4.2.55. Shape-based self-assembly
    • 4.2.56. Fluidic assembly (electrophoretic): overview
    • 4.2.57. Electrophoretic positioning of LEDs
    • 4.2.58. PARC's xerographic micro-assembly Printing
    • 4.2.59. Fluidic-assembly (surface energy): overview
    • 4.2.60. Mechanism of surface-tension-driven fluidic assembly
    • 4.2.61. Surface tension based fluidic assembly
    • 4.2.62. Fluidic-assembly (magnetic): overview
    • 4.2.63. Magnetically-assisted assembly
    • 4.2.64. Fluidic-assembly (photoelectrochemical): overview
    • 4.2.65. Photoelectrochemically driven fluidic-assembly
    • 4.2.66. Fluidic-assembly (combination): overview
    • 4.2.67. Chip mounting apparatus
    • 4.2.68. Summary of fluidic assembly
    • 4.2.69. SelfArray
    • 4.2.70. Laser enabled transfer
    • 4.2.71. Overview of laser enabled transfer
    • 4.2.72. Laser beam requirement
    • 4.2.73. Coherent UVtransfer 3in1 System
    • 4.2.74. Uniqarta's parallel laser-enabled transfer technology
    • 4.2.75. QMAT's beam-addressed release technology
    • 4.2.76. Optovate's technology
    • 4.2.77. Coherent's approach
    • 4.2.78. Toray's offering
    • 4.2.79. Visionox's achievement
    • 4.2.80. Other chiplet mass transfer techniques
    • 4.2.81. Korean Institute of Machinery and Materials (KIMM)
    • 4.2.82. VueReal's cartridge printing technique
    • 4.2.83. VueReal's micro printer
    • 4.2.84. Innovasonic's technology
    • 4.2.85. Rohinni's technology
    • 4.2.86. Two-step micro-transfer technology
    • 4.2.87. Micro-transfer using a stretchable film
    • 4.2.88. Micro-pick-and-place
    • 4.2.89. Photo-polymer mass transfer
  • 4.3. Monolithic Hybrid Integration
    • 4.3.1. Monolithic integration
    • 4.3.2. Flip-chip hybrid integration
    • 4.3.3. Wafer bonding process
    • 4.3.4. Monolithic hybrid integration structure
    • 4.3.5. Selective transfer by selective bonding-debonding
    • 4.3.6. Pros and cons of monolithic hybrid integration
    • 4.3.7. Players on monolithic hybrid integration
  • 4.4. All-In-One Transfer
    • 4.4.1. All-in-one CMOS driving
    • 4.4.2. Pros and cons of all-in-one CMOS driving technique
  • 4.5. Fully Monolithic Integration
    • 4.5.1. Introduction of fully monolithic integration
    • 4.5.2. JBD's integration technology
    • 4.5.3. Lumiode approach
    • 4.5.4. Lumiode approach, process details
    • 4.5.5. Temperature performance for the crystallization
    • 4.5.6. Wafer from Lumiode
    • 4.5.7. Ostendo's approach
    • 4.5.8. Ostendo's QPI structure
  • 4.6. GaN on Silicon
    • 4.6.1. GaN-on-Si for various application markets
    • 4.6.2. GaN on silicon epi types
    • 4.6.3. Challenges of GaN-on-Silicon epitaxy
    • 4.6.4. Value propositions of GaN-on-Si
    • 4.6.5. GaN on sapphire vs. on silicon
    • 4.6.6. GaN-on-Si approach
    • 4.6.7. Cost comparison: sapphire vs silicon
    • 4.6.8. Is GaN-on-Si the ultimate option?
    • 4.6.9. Players working on GaN micro-LEDs on silicon
  • 4.7. Nanowires
    • 4.7.1. Comparison between 2D and 3D micro-LEDs
    • 4.7.2. GaN epitaxy on silicon substrate
    • 4.7.3. Aledia process flow
    • 4.7.4. Aledia's nanowire technology
    • 4.7.5. Front size device technology
    • 4.7.6. Nanowires growth on silicon substrate
    • 4.7.7. Size influence on nanowire's efficiency
    • 4.7.8. Native EL RGB nanowires
    • 4.7.9. 3D technology for small-display applications
    • 4.7.10. Micro-display enabled by nanowires and 3D integration
    • 4.7.11. Future of nanowire approach
  • 4.8. Bonding and interconnection
    • 4.8.1. Classification
    • 4.8.2. Summary
    • 4.8.3. Wire bonding and flip chip bonding
    • 4.8.4. ACF bonding
    • 4.8.5. Interconnection by resin reflow
    • 4.8.6. Microtube interconnections
    • 4.8.7. Microtube fabrication
    • 4.8.8. Transfer and interconnection process by microtubes

5. TESTING

  • 5.1. Testing techniques
  • 5.2. Challenges in inspection
  • 5.3. PL vs. EL testing
  • 5.4. EL test by Tesoro Scientific
  • 5.5. Camera-based microscopic imaging system
  • 5.6. Inspection solution by Toray
  • 5.7. Instrument System's solution
  • 5.8. PL+AOI
  • 5.9. TTPCON's solution
  • 5.10. Cathodoluminescence used for testing
  • 5.11. Hamamatsu Photonics' PL testing
  • 5.12. Trends of testing

6. DEFECT MANAGEMENT

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Defect types
  • 6.3. Redundancy
  • 6.4. Repair
  • 6.5. Laser micro trimming
  • 6.6. PlayNitride's SMAR Tech
  • 6.7. Defect compensation by QDs

7. MICRO-LED DISPLAY FULL-COLOUR REALIZATION

  • 7.1.1. Strategies for full colour realization
  • 7.1.2. Direct RGB or color converters?
  • 7.1.3. RGB micro-LEDs vs. blue micro-LED + QD
  • 7.2. Colour filters
    • 7.2.1. Colour filters
    • 7.2.2. Colour filter process flow: black matrix process
    • 7.2.3. Colour filter process flow: RGB process
  • 7.3. Optical lens synthesis
    • 7.3.1. Full colour realized by optical lens synthesis
    • 7.3.2. Full colour realization for projectors
  • 7.4. Do phosphors work for micro-LED displays?
    • 7.4.1. Introduction to phosphors
    • 7.4.2. Requirements for phosphors in LEDs
    • 7.4.3. Table of phosphor materials
    • 7.4.4. Search for narrow FWHM red phosphors
    • 7.4.5. Common and emerging red-emitting phosphors
    • 7.4.6. Red phosphor options: TriGainTM from GE
    • 7.4.7. Reliability of TriGain
    • 7.4.8. Commercial progress of GE's narrowband red phosphor
    • 7.4.9. Small sized PFS phosphor
    • 7.4.10. Red phosphor options: Sr[LiAl3N4]:Eu2+ (SLA) red phosphor
    • 7.4.11. Thermal stability of common RGY phosphors
    • 7.4.12. Narrow band green phosphor
    • 7.4.13. High performance organic phosphors
    • 7.4.14. Toray's organic colour conversion film
    • 7.4.15. Colour coverage of Toray's colour conversion films
    • 7.4.16. Stability of Toray's colour conversion films
    • 7.4.17. Response time feature of Toray's colour conversion films
    • 7.4.18. Suppliers of phosphors
  • 7.5. Quantum dot approach
    • 7.5.1. Introduction to quantum dots
    • 7.5.2. Value propositions of QDs in displays
    • 7.5.3. Quantum dots used for micro-LED displays
    • 7.5.4. QDs vs. phosphors: particle size
    • 7.5.5. QDs vs. phosphors: response time
    • 7.5.6. QDs vs. phosphors: colour tunability
    • 7.5.7. QDs vs. phosphors: stability
    • 7.5.8. QDs vs. phosphors: FWHM
    • 7.5.9. Pros and cons of QD converters
    • 7.5.10. Basic requirements of QDs for micro-LED displays
    • 7.5.11. Trade-off between efficiency and leakage
    • 7.5.12. Efficiency drop and red shift
    • 7.5.13. Thickness of the QD layer for absorption
    • 7.5.14. Display structure with QDs
    • 7.5.15. Polarizers, short-pass filters, and other additional layers?
    • 7.5.16. High blue absorptive QD materials
    • 7.5.17. QD converters for μLED displays
    • 7.5.18. Inkjet printing used for colour filters
    • 7.5.19. Ink-jet printed QD colour converters
    • 7.5.20. Curing methods
    • 7.5.21. Inkjet printed QD
    • 7.5.22. DIC's work
    • 7.5.23. Photolithography process
    • 7.5.24. QD photoresist fabrication
    • 7.5.25. Photoresist approach
    • 7.5.26. Successive patterning of red and green QD of various sizes
    • 7.5.27. QD photoresist
    • 7.5.28. Quantum-dots colour conversion layer
    • 7.5.29. Full-colour emission of quantum-dot-based micro-LED display by aerosol jet technology
    • 7.5.30. Electrohydrodynamic jet printing
    • 7.5.31. Taiwan Nanocrystals: photo-patternable QDs for μLED displays
  • 7.6. Quantum well approach
    • 7.6.1. Quantum wells
    • 7.6.2. Conclusions

8. LIGHT MANAGEMENT

  • 8.1. Light management approach summary
  • 8.2. Layers to optimize current distribution for better light extraction
  • 8.3. InfiniLED's approach to increase light extraction efficiency
  • 8.4. Methods to capture light output
  • 8.5. Micro-catadioptric optical array for better directionality

9. BACKPLANES AND DRIVING

  • 9.1. Backplane and driving options for Micro-LED displays
  • 9.2. Introduction to metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors
  • 9.3. Introduction to thin film transistors
  • 9.4. Introduction to complementary metal oxide semiconductor
  • 9.5. Introduction to backplane
  • 9.6. TFT materials
  • 9.7. Pixel driving for OLED
  • 9.8. LCD pixel structure
  • 9.9. TFT backplane
  • 9.10. Passive matrix addressing
  • 9.11. Passive driving structure
  • 9.12. Active matrix addressing
  • 9.13. Comparison between PM and AM addressing
  • 9.14. Transistor-micro-LED connection design
  • 9.15. Driving for micro-LEDs
  • 9.16. Pulse width modulation
  • 9.17. PAM vs. PWM
  • 9.18. Driving voltage
  • 9.19. Driving vs. EQE
  • 9.20. RGB driver
  • 9.21. Active matrix micro-LEDs with LTPS TFT backplane
  • 9.22. Conclusion

10. IMAGE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, POWER CONSUMPTION REDUCTION AND OTHER DESIGNS

  • 10.1. Image Quality Improvement
    • 10.1.1. TFT-based image uniformity issues
    • 10.1.2. LED binning
    • 10.1.3. Drive design
    • 10.1.4. Optical compensation
    • 10.1.5. Drive compensation
  • 10.2. Power Consumption Reduction
    • 10.2.1. LED and TFT
    • 10.2.2. Drive mode optimization
    • 10.2.3. Backplane optimization

11. MINI-LED DISPLAYS

  • 11.1. Mini-LED display configurations
  • 11.2. What kind of role is mini-LED playing?
  • 11.3. MiniLEDs, real hope for 2021 onward?
  • 11.4. Trends of Mini-LED displays

12. COST ANALYSIS

  • 12.1. Cost basics
  • 12.2. Micro-LED cost vs. Die size
  • 12.3. Cost assumption
  • 12.4. Cost analysis
  • 12.5. Economics of micro-LED: cost down paths

13. MARKET ANALYSIS

  • 13.1. Forecast approaches and assumptions
  • 13.2. Market forecast of shipment unit
  • 13.3. 2026 & 2031 application market share
  • 13.4. Market forecast analysis
  • 13.5. Wafer value forecast

14. PARTNERSHIPS, MERGES, ACQUISITIONS AND JOINT VENTURE

  • 14.1. Display cycle
  • 14.2. Benefits
  • 14.3. Epistar & Leyard
  • 14.4. PlayNitride & RIT Display
  • 14.5. Konka & Chongqing Liangshan Industrial Investment, Konka & LianTronics
  • 14.6. BOE & Rohinni
  • 14.7. Lextar & X Display
  • 14.8. JDI & glo, Kyocera & glo
  • 14.9. Seoul Semiconductors & Viosys
  • 14.10. Kulicke & Soffa and Uniqarta

15. PLAYERS AND CASE STUDIES

  • 15.1.1. Players discussed in this report
  • 15.2. Aledia
    • 15.2.1. Aledia: introduction
    • 15.2.2. Scalability to larger silicon substrate
    • 15.2.3. Aledia's quasi-fabless business model
    • 15.2.4. Integration process of Aledia's WireLED display
    • 15.2.5. Wafer uniformity of nanowires
    • 15.2.6. Colour conversion of WireLEDs
    • 15.2.7. Interconnection options
    • 15.2.8. Aledia's display modules
  • 15.3. ALLOS Semiconductors
    • 15.3.1. ALLOS Semiconductors: introduction
    • 15.3.2. Strain management and emission uniformity
    • 15.3.3. Strain management
    • 15.3.4. Aoto Electronics
  • 15.4. Apple
    • 15.4.1. Apple
    • 15.4.2. Apple's new Micro-LED chiplet architecture
    • 15.4.3. AU Optronics
  • 15.5. AU Optronics
    • 15.5.1. AUO's LTPS TFT driven micro-LED display
  • 15.6. BOE
    • 15.6.1. Speeding up towards mini- and micro-LED displays
    • 15.6.2. BOE mini-LED Backlight
    • 15.6.3. BOE Mini LED Display
  • 15.7. CEA-Leti
    • 15.7.1. CEA-Leti: introduction
    • 15.7.2. Demos by hybridization technology
    • 15.7.3. Display performance
    • 15.7.4. Process of fabricating hybridization micro-displays
    • 15.7.5. Process of fabricating monolithic micro-displays
    • 15.7.6. Novel approach for monolithic display fabrication
  • 15.8. Chengdu Vistar Optoelectronics
    • 15.8.1. Chengdu Vistar Optoelectronics
  • 15.9. EpiPix
    • 15.9.1. Introduction of EpiPix
    • 15.9.2. EpiPix's technique
  • 15.10. glo
    • 15.10.1. Introduction of glo
    • 15.10.2. Glo's technology
    • 15.10.3. Glo's prototypes
  • 15.11. ITRI
    • 15.11.1. ITRI development of micro-LEDs
    • 15.11.2. ITRI's progress
    • 15.11.3. ITRI's offering
    • 15.11.4. Micro-LED device characteristics
    • 15.11.5. Reliability test
    • 15.11.6. ITRI's MicroLED displays
    • 15.11.7. ITRI's transparent MicroLED displays
    • 15.11.8. ITRI
  • 15.12. Jade Bird Display
    • 15.12.1. Jade Bird Display: introduction
    • 15.12.2. Existing hybrid integration technology by flip chip technique
    • 15.12.3. Device fabrication
    • 15.12.4. Device structure and architecture
    • 15.12.5. micro-LEDs for the JBD's micro-displays
    • 15.12.6. JBD's monochromatic AM micro-LED micro-displays
    • 15.12.7. AM micro-LED with directional emission
    • 15.12.8. Application: 3 colour LED projector
    • 15.12.9. High PPI AM micro-LED micro-display
    • 15.12.10. AM micro-LED chips
    • 15.12.11. Prototype for AR/VR
  • 15.13. Japan Display Inc. (JDI)
    • 15.13.1. JDI's prototype
  • 15.14. Konka
    • 15.14.1. Konka's efforts on Micro-LED displays
    • 15.14.2. Konka's smart watch
  • 15.15. Kyocera
    • 15.15.1. Kyocera: high PPI micro-LED display
    • 15.15.2. Kyocera: display design
  • 15.16. LG
    • 15.16.1. Micro LED Signage
  • 15.17. Lumens
    • 15.17.1. Lumens' micro-LED displays
    • 15.17.2. Lumen's prototypes
  • 15.18. Lumiode
    • 15.18.1. Lumiode: introduction
    • 15.18.2. Lumiode approach, process details
    • 15.18.3. Lumiode's micro-LED performance
    • 15.18.4. Lumiode's device performance
  • 15.19. Micro Nitride
    • 15.19.1. Micro Nitride: Introduction
    • 15.19.2. Micro Nitride's technology
  • 15.20. Mikro Mesa
    • 15.20.1. About Mikro Mesa
    • 15.20.2. Mikro Mesa's micro-LEDs
    • 15.20.3. Mikro Mesa: Current injection
  • 15.21. Nanjing CEC Panda FPD Technology
    • 15.21.1. Introduction of CEC Panda
    • 15.21.2. Micro-LED and oxide development of Panda
  • 15.22. Plessey
    • 15.22.1. Plessey: GaN-on-Silicon
    • 15.22.2. Plessey's display development roadmap
    • 15.22.3. LED manufacturing
    • 15.22.4. Pixel development
    • 15.22.5. RGB GaN on silicon
    • 15.22.6. Plessey's core development
    • 15.22.7. Prototype
  • 15.23. PlayNitride
    • 15.23.1. PlayNitride: Introduction
    • 15.23.2. Role of PlayNitride at micro-LED ecosystem
    • 15.23.3. PlayNitride timeline
    • 15.23.4. PlayNitride's application market
    • 15.23.5. PixeLED display structure
    • 15.23.6. PixeLED MatrixTM tiling display technology
    • 15.23.7. PlayNitride: Prototypes
  • 15.24. Rohinni
    • 15.24.1. Introduction of Rohinni
    • 15.24.2. Technology
    • 15.24.3. Product benefits example
  • 15.25. Samsung
    • 15.25.1. Samsung left LCD business
    • 15.25.2. The Wall vs. The Window
    • 15.25.3. LED Cinema Screen
    • 15.25.4. Samsung's MicroLED Home Screen at CES 2021
    • 15.25.5. Samsung's QNED
    • 15.25.6. Price of Samsung TVs
    • 15.25.7. RGB one chip
  • 15.26. Saphlux
    • 15.26.1. Saphlux: introduction
    • 15.26.2. NPQD technology
  • 15.27. Sharp
    • 15.27.1. Sharp: introduction
    • 15.27.2. Process flow of Silicon Display
    • 15.27.3. Display driver
    • 15.27.4. Monolithic micro-LED array
    • 15.27.5. Full colour realization
    • 15.27.6. Prototypes made by Sharp
    • 15.27.7. New spin-off
  • 15.28. Sony
    • 15.28.1. Sony: initial efforts
    • 15.28.2. Sony: scalable display system
    • 15.28.3. Sony: precise tiling
    • 15.28.4. Sony: micro-LEDs
    • 15.28.5. Sony: viewing angle advantages
    • 15.28.6. Sony: active matrix driving with micro IC
    • 15.28.7. Sony: HDR reproducibility
    • 15.28.8. Sony: business strategy
  • 15.29. Stan (Shenzhen) Technology
    • 15.29.1. Stan Technology
  • 15.30. TCL/CSOT
    • 15.30.1. The Cinema Wall
    • 15.30.2. TFT backplane-based micro-LED displays
    • 15.30.3. TCL CSOT Mini LED roadmap
  • 15.31. Visionox
    • 15.31.1. Visionox's planning
  • 15.32. VueReal
  • 15.33. VueReal: introduction
  • 15.34. VueReal: high efficiency micro-LEDs
  • 15.35. VueReal: Inspection
  • 15.36. VueReal: curing
  • 15.37. VueReal: prototypes

16. APPENDIX

  • 16.1. Colours and pixels
  • 16.2. What is resolution?
  • 16.3. Pixel pitch and fill factor
  • 16.4. EQE and IQE
  • 16.5. 3D colour volume
  • 16.6. LCD panel structure
  • 16.7. Active matrix-LCD structure
Back to Top
전화 문의
F A Q