자동차 서스펜션 시장 : 작동 방식별, 컴포넌트별, 구조별, 시스템별, 차량 유형별, 용도별, 지역별 예측(-2032년)

The automotive suspension market is expected to grow from USD 39.91 billion in 2025 to USD 42.43 billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 0.9% during the forecast period. Rising global sales of SUVs, electric vehicles, and luxury cars are driving the suspension market.

Additionally, the increasing adoption of air suspension systems in buses and trucks is driving the growth of the advanced suspension systems market.

The air suspension market is expected to continue expanding in 2025. The growth is driven by the increased adoption of luxury buses, premium coaches, heavy-duty trucks, and electric buses, particularly in North America and Europe, where OEMs like Daimler, Volvo, and Scania prioritize ride quality, safety, and load adaptive stability for long-haul operations. Heavy-duty trucks, such as the Volvo FH and Freightliner Cascadia, increasingly integrate electronically controlled air suspensions to protect fragile cargo and optimize handling. Although Asia Pacific adoption is currently lower due to cost sensitivity, premium intercity buses and advanced logistics vehicles in China and India are rapidly adopting these systems, fueled by consumer expectations for comfort and urban freight demands. Innovations in lightweight materials, modular air springs, and integration with electronic stability systems continue to enhance performance and durability, establishing air suspension as a key differentiator in both the passenger and commercial segments globally.

"Passenger cars is the largest market for automotive suspension during the forecast period."

The passenger cars segment remains the largest in the global automotive suspension market, driven by high production volumes, the popularity of SUVs and premium vehicles, and growing demand for ride comfort and handling. Most hatchbacks, sedans, and mid-size SUVs utilize MacPherson strut front suspensions due to their simple design, compact & lightweight structure, cost efficiency, and ease of integration into modular platforms. Whereas high-end SUVs and coupes adopt double wishbone systems for superior handling and stability. The double wishbone suspension is commonly found in high-performance and luxury vehicle segments from brands like BMW, Lexus, and Mercedes-Benz, among others.

At the rear, torsion beams dominate compact and mid-range cars, offering space efficiency and affordability, especially in Asia, Europe, and the RoW markets. In contrast, multilink suspensions are common in premium and performance SUVs in North America, Europe, and luxury Asian markets, providing better comfort and control. Air suspensions, still limited to ultra-premium vehicles, enhance NVH and adaptive handling, with brands like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Toyota, and Hyundai integrating semi-active and active damping in flagship models. Overall, MacPherson and torsion beam systems lead the mass-market segment, while double wishbone, multilink, and air suspensions define the premium category; this trend is expected to continue in the coming years.

"Growth in electric vehicle sales to drive the demand for suspension systems."

The EV segment is emerging as one of the fastest-growing markets for automotive suspension systems in 2025, driven by accelerating global EV adoption, government incentives, and stricter emissions regulations. Electric passenger vehicles account for the highest demand among alternative powertrain vehicles. For the electric cars segment, compact and mid-size EVs predominantly use MacPherson strut front suspensions with torsion beam or multilink rear setups, similar to the technologies adopted for ICE counterparts. Alternatively, premium EVs and performance models such as the BMW i5, Porsche Taycan Cross Turismo, Lucid Air, and Tesla Model S/X increasingly deploy multilink suspensions to manage battery weight and optimize ride comfort. In electric passenger cars, key suspension technologies include lightweight multilink setups with integrated composite control arms and electronically controlled dampers that optimize ride comfort and handling while minimizing energy consumption. Innovations such as electromagnetic actuators and predictive suspension control, featured in models like the Tesla Model S and Porsche Taycan, differentiate by enhancing dynamic response and battery range. For electric buses, air suspension dominates (>90%) due to its superior passenger comfort and load adaptability, which is achieved by integrating modular air spring systems with electronic height control. Electric trucks combine traditional robust parabolic leaf springs with emerging electrohydraulic and semi-active damping systems to balance heavy payload demands and improve drivetrain efficiency, as exemplified by Volvo's electric FH series. The global shift toward EVs, combined with rising consumer expectations for ride quality and premium driving experiences, is driving robust demand for advanced, weight-optimized suspension architectures across the EV market.

"North America is expected to be the second-largest market during the forecast period."

In North America, passenger cars primarily utilize MacPherson struts at the front and multilink suspensions at the rear to enhance ride quality and handling. This design is evident in models such as the Tesla Model 3 and Cadillac CT4. For pickups and light commercial vehicles (LCVs), double wishbone and multilink front suspensions are preferred for enhanced load management and improved off-road performance, while rear setups typically feature torsion beams and leaf springs. Heavy-duty trucks mainly depend on parabolic and semi-elliptical leaf springs. Similarly, intercity buses also employ these robust mechanical suspensions, although air suspension is typically reserved for premium models. EVs across various segments emphasize the use of lightweight multilink and composite components, along with electronic damping systems, to effectively balance battery weight and optimize efficiency. The North American market is rapidly advancing in adaptive and integrated suspension technologies, presenting opportunities for OEMs and aftermarket providers to develop smart, durable solutions specifically tailored for electrified and commercial vehicle platforms.

In-depth interviews were conducted with CEOs, marketing directors, other innovation and technology directors, and executives from various key organizations operating in this market.

• By Company Type: OEMs - 30% and Automotive Suspension Manufacturers - 70%
• By Designation: C-level - 35%, Director Level - 55%, and Others - 10%
• By Region: North America - 20%, Europe - 45%, Asia Pacific - 30%, and the Rest of the World - 5%

The automotive suspension market is dominated by established players, including Continental AG (Germany), ZF Friedrichshafen AG (Germany), ThyssenKrupp AG (Germany), KYB Corporation (Japan), and Tenneco Inc. (US). These companies actively manufacture and develop new and advanced rubber seals. They have set up R&D facilities and offer best-in-class products to their customers.

Research Coverage

The study segments the automotive suspension market and forecasts the market size based on system (passive suspension, semi-active suspension, and active suspension), active suspension market, actuation (hydraulically actuated and electronically actuated), architecture (MacPherson strut, double wishbone, multilink, twist beam/torsion beam, leaf spring suspension, air suspension), OE market, component (coil spring, air spring, shock dampener, strut, control arm, ball joint, rubber bushing, leaf spring, and sway bar/link stabilizer), aftermarket, component (shock absorber, strut, ball joint, leaf spring, control arm, coil spring), vehicle type (passenger cars, light commercial vehicles, trucks, and buses), electric & hybrid passenger car suspension, architecture (leaf spring suspension, air suspension, double wishbone, MacPherson strut, multilink, twist beam/torsion beam), electric & hybrid trucks and buses suspension, vehicle type (trucks and buses), off-highway application (construction & mining and agricultural tractors), all-terrain vehicles, and region (Asia Pacific, North America, Europe, and the Rest of the World).

Key Benefits of Purchasing this Report

The study provides a comprehensive competitive analysis of key market players, including their company profiles, key insights into product and business offerings, recent developments, and primary market strategies. The report will assist market leaders and new entrants with estimates of revenue figures for the overall automotive suspension market and its subsegments. It helps stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain additional insights to better position their businesses and develop effective go-to-market strategies. Additionally, the report provides information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities, enabling stakeholders to stay informed about market dynamics.

The report provides insights into the following points:

• Analysis of key drivers (strong premium SUV & pickup demand and regulatory pressure on vehicle & passenger safety & curb emissions), restraints (high system cost vs. ROI in non-premium segments), opportunities (integration of smart/connected suspensions with ADAS & SDVs and local manufacturing & supply chain opportunities), and challenges (balancing suspension weight and range efficiency in electric vehicles) influencing the growth of the automotive suspension market.
• Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on upcoming technologies, R&D activities, and product launches in the automotive suspension market.
• Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative markets - the report analyses the automotive suspension across various regions.
• Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the automotive suspension market.
• Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, and service offerings of leading players like Continental AG (Germany), ZF Friedrichshafen AG (Germany), ThyssenKrupp AG (Germany), KYB Corporation (Japan), and Tenneco Inc. (US) in the market.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
• 1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
• 1.3 STUDY SCOPE
  • 1.3.1 MARKET SEGMENTATION
  • 1.3.2 INCLUSIONS & EXCLUSIONS
• 1.4 YEARS CONSIDERED
• 1.5 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
• 1.6 UNIT CONSIDERED
• 1.7 STAKEHOLDERS
• 1.8 SUMMARY OF CHANGES

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

• 2.1 RESEARCH DATA
  • 2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
    • 2.1.1.1 List of key secondary sources referred to for estimating vehicle production
    • 2.1.1.2 List of key secondary sources referred to for estimating automotive suspension market
    • 2.1.1.3 Key data from secondary sources
  • 2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
    • 2.1.2.1 Primary interviews: Demand and supply sides
    • 2.1.2.2 Breakdown of primary interviews
    • 2.1.2.3 Primary participants
• 2.2 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
  • 2.2.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
  • 2.2.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
• 2.3 DATA TRIANGULATION
• 2.4 FACTOR ANALYSIS
  • 2.4.1 DEMAND- AND SUPPLY-SIDE FACTOR ANALYSIS
• 2.5 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
• 2.6 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS & RISK ASSESSMENT

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

• 3.1 KEY INSIGHTS AND MARKET HIGHLIGHTS
• 3.2 KEY MARKET PARTICIPANTS: MAPPING OF STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENTS
• 3.3 DISRUPTIVE TRENDS IN THE AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET
• 3.4 HIGH-GROWTH SEGMENTS
• 3.5 SNAPSHOT: REGIONAL MARKET SIZE, GROWTH RATE, AND FORECAST

4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS

• 4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS IN AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET
• 4.2 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY SYSTEM
• 4.3 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY ARCHITECTURE
• 4.4 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY VEHICLE TYPE
• 4.5 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION OE MARKET, BY COMPONENT
• 4.6 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION AFTERMARKET, BY COMPONENT
• 4.7 ELECTRIC & HYBRID PASSENGER CAR SUSPENSION MARKET, BY ARCHITECTURE
• 4.8 ELECTRIC & HYBRID HCV SUSPENSION MARKET, BY VEHICLE TYPE
• 4.9 ACTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY ACTUATION
• 4.10 OFF-HIGHWAY SUSPENSION MARKET, BY APPLICATION
• 4.11 ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY REGION
• 4.12 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY REGION

5 MARKET OVERVIEW

• 5.1 INTRODUCTION
• 5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS
  • 5.2.1 DRIVERS
    • 5.2.1.1 Rising demand for premium SUVs and pickup trucks
    • 5.2.1.2 Regulatory pressure on vehicle and passenger safety and emissions
  • 5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
    • 5.2.2.1 High cost of suspension systems
  • 5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
    • 5.2.3.1 Integration of smart/connected suspension systems with ADAS and SDVs
    • 5.2.3.2 Local manufacturing and supply chain opportunities
  • 5.2.4 CHALLENGES
    • 5.2.4.1 Balancing suspension weight and range efficiency in electric vehicles
• 5.3 UNMET NEEDS AND WHITE SPACES
• 5.4 INTERCONNECTED MARKETS AND CROSS-SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES
• 5.5 STRATEGIC MOVES BY TIER 1/2/3 PLAYERS

6 CUSTOMER LANDSCAPE & BUYER BEHAVIOR

• 6.1 DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
• 6.2 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING EVALUATION CRITERIA
  • 6.2.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
  • 6.2.2 BUYING CRITERIA
• 6.3 ADOPTION BARRIERS & INTERNAL CHALLENGES
• 6.4 MARKET PROFITABILITY
  • 6.4.1 REVENUE POTENTIAL
  • 6.4.2 COST DYNAMICS

7 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE

• 7.1 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
  • 7.1.1 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
  • 7.1.2 GLOBAL SAFETY REGULATIONS

8 STRATEGIC DISRUPTION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, PATENTS, DIGITAL, AND AI ADOPTION

• 8.1 PATENT ANALYSIS
  • 8.1.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 8.1.1.1 Methodology
    • 8.1.1.2 Document type
    • 8.1.1.3 Insights
    • 8.1.1.4 Legal status of patents
    • 8.1.1.5 Jurisdiction analysis
    • 8.1.1.6 Top applicants
    • 8.1.1.7 List of patents
• 8.2 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
  • 8.2.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
    • 8.2.1.1 Active and semi-active suspension systems
    • 8.2.1.2 In-wheel suspension technology
  • 8.2.2 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
    • 8.2.2.1 ADAS & sensor fusion integration
  • 8.2.3 ADJACENT TECHNOLOGIES
    • 8.2.3.1 Lightweight materials and additive manufacturing
    • 8.2.3.2 Regenerative suspension systems
• 8.3 TECHNOLOGY/PRODUCT ROADMAP
• 8.4 FUTURE APPLICATIONS
• 8.5 IMPACT OF AI/GEN AI ON AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET
  • 8.5.1 TOP USE CASES OF AI IMPLEMENTATION AND MARKET POTENTIAL
  • 8.5.2 BEST PRACTICES IN AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION DEVELOPMENT
  • 8.5.3 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET: CASE STUDIES RELATED TO IMPLEMENTATION OF GEN AI
  • 8.5.4 INTERCONNECTED ADJACENT MARKET ECOSYSTEM AND IMPACT ON MARKET PLAYERS
  • 8.5.5 CLIENTS' READINESS TO ADOPT GENERATIVE AI IN AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET
• 8.6 SUCCESS STORIES AND REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS
  • 8.6.1 ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN: AI-DRIVEN ADAPTIVE DAMPER CALIBRATION
  • 8.6.2 KYB CORPORATION: PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE FOR ELECTRONIC DAMPERS
  • 8.6.3 HITACHI ASTEMO: ELECTROHYDRAULIC ACTUATOR OPTIMIZATION
  • 8.6.4 CONTINENTAL: SMART AIR SPRING WITH SENSOR INTEGRATION
• 8.7 REGIONAL AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION HOTSPOTS AND LOCALIZATION DYNAMICS
• 8.8 SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS IN AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION COMPONENTS
• 8.9 POLICY DRIVES SHAPING SUSPENSION SOURCING
• 8.10 COST TRAJECTORY FOR NEXT-GEN SUSPENSION SYSTEMS
• 8.11 SHARE OF AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS IN BILL OF MATERIALS FOR EVS, 2025 VS. 2032
• 8.12 SUSPENSION SOURCING MODELS: MULTI-SUPPLIER VS. CAPTIVE DESIGN
• 8.13 UPCOMING VEHICLE LAUNCHES AND FUTURE DEMAND FOR SUSPENSION SYSTEMS

9 INDUSTRY TRENDS

• 9.1 MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS
  • 9.1.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 9.1.2 GDP TRENDS AND FORECAST
  • 9.1.3 TRENDS IN GLOBAL ELECTRIC VEHICLE INDUSTRY
  • 9.1.4 TRENDS IN GLOBAL AUTOMOTIVE & TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY
• 9.2 ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
  • 9.2.1 RAW MATERIAL SUPPLIERS
  • 9.2.2 COMPONENT MANUFACTURERS
  • 9.2.3 SYSTEM INTEGRATORS/SUSPENSION MANUFACTURERS
  • 9.2.4 OEM ASSEMBLY
  • 9.2.5 AFTERMARKET AND REPLACEMENT PART PROVIDERS
• 9.3 SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
• 9.4 PRICING ANALYSIS
  • 9.4.1 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS, BY REGION
  • 9.4.2 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE OF TRUCK SUSPENSION ARCHITECTURE TYPES, BY REGION
  • 9.4.3 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE OF AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION OE COMPONENTS, BY REGION
• 9.5 TRENDS AND DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS
• 9.6 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO
• 9.7 KEY CONFERENCES & EVENTS, 2025-2026
• 9.8 TRADE ANALYSIS
  • 9.8.1 EXPORT SCENARIO
  • 9.8.2 IMPORT SCENARIO
  • 9.8.3 TRADE RESTRICTIONS
  • 9.8.4 US-CHINA EXPORT BANS
  • 9.8.5 EU SUBSIDY RACE
  • 9.8.6 IMPACT OF LOCALIZATION POLICIES ON SOURCING
  • 9.8.7 CXO PRIORITIES
• 9.9 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
  • 9.9.1 LINK AND VOLVO ENGINEERING TEAMS COLLABORATED TO DEVELOP PROPRIETARY APPLICATION AND VALIDATE FUEL SAVINGS
  • 9.9.2 EMPLOYEES OF HENDRICKSON USA, L.L.C. IMPORTED CREO CAD GEOMETRY OF SUSPENSION SYSTEM
  • 9.9.3 CONTINENTAL AG DEVELOPED HITEMP AIR SPRINGS, CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING TEMPERATURES
• 9.10 IMPACT OF US TARIFF
  • 9.10.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 9.10.2 KEY TARIFF RATES
  • 9.10.3 PRICE IMPACT ANALYSIS
  • 9.10.4 IMPACT ON REGION/COUNTRY
  • 9.10.5 IMPACT ON END-USE INDUSTRIES

10 ACTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY ACTUATION

• 10.1 INTRODUCTION
• 10.2 HYDRAULICALLY ACTUATED ACTIVE SUSPENSION
  • 10.2.1 HYDRAULIC SUSPENSION SYSTEMS REPLACE CONVENTIONAL COIL SPRINGS WITH AIR SPRINGS
• 10.3 ELECTRONICALLY ACTUATED ACTIVE SUSPENSION
  • 10.3.1 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS DRIVING NEED FOR ELECTRONICALLY ACTUATED ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEM
• 10.4 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

11 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION AFTERMARKET, BY COMPONENT

• 11.1 INTRODUCTION
• 11.2 SHOCK ABSORBERS
  • 11.2.1 SHOCK ABSORBERS ARE AMONG MOST FREQUENTLY REPLACED SUSPENSION COMPONENTS DUE TO NATURAL WEAR FROM CONTINUOUS DAMPING CYCLES
• 11.3 STRUTS
  • 11.3.1 GROWING VEHICLE SALES TO BOOST DEMAND FOR STRUTS
• 11.4 BALL JOINTS
  • 11.4.1 BALL JOINTS ARE UNIVERSALLY USED IN FRONT SUSPENSION
• 11.5 LEAF SPRINGS
  • 11.5.1 ABILITY OF LEAF SPRINGS TO HANDLE HEAVY LOAD TO DRIVE THEIR DEMAND
• 11.6 CONTROL ARMS
  • 11.6.1 ALUMINUM AND HYBRID COMPOSITE CONTROL ARMS TO GAIN POPULARITY AS LIGHTWEIGHT REPLACEMENTS COMPATIBLE WITH OE SPECIFICATIONS
• 11.7 COIL SPRINGS
  • 11.7.1 COIL SPRINGS ALLOW MAXIMUM RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN SUSPENSION SYSTEM
• 11.8 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

12 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY ARCHITECTURE

• 12.1 INTRODUCTION
• 12.2 MACPHERSON STRUT
  • 12.2.1 COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND SIMPLE DESIGN MAKE MACPHERSON STRUT SUITABLE FOR PASSENGER CARS
• 12.3 DOUBLE WISHBONE
  • 12.3.1 COMPLEX DESIGN AND HIGH COST MAKE DOUBLE WISHBONE SUITABLE FOR PREMIUM VEHICLES
• 12.4 MULTILINK
  • 12.4.1 MULTILINK SUSPENSION PROVIDES BETTER RIDE QUALITY AND HANDLING
• 12.5 TWIST BEAM/TORSION BEAM
  • 12.5.1 DEMAND FOR TWIST BEAM/TORSION BEAM SUSPENSION IS LIMITED TO ECONOMIC CARS
• 12.6 LEAF SPRING
  • 12.6.1 LEAF SPRINGS ARE PREFERRED IN HEAVY TRUCKS DUE TO THEIR HIGH LOAD-CARRYING CAPACITY
• 12.7 AIR SUSPENSION
  • 12.7.1 INCREASED DEMAND FOR CABIN COMFORT, BETTER CONTROL, AND STABILITY TO DRIVE MARKET
• 12.8 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

13 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY SYSTEM

• 13.1 INTRODUCTION
• 13.2 PASSIVE
  • 13.2.1 MACPHERSON STRUT AND DOUBLE WISHBONE ARE MOST COMMONLY USED PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN PASSENGER CARS
• 13.3 SEMI-ACTIVE
  • 13.3.1 INCREASING DEMAND FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE CARS TO DRIVE MARKET FOR SEMI-ACTIVE SYSTEMS
• 13.4 ACTIVE
  • 13.4.1 INCREASING DEMAND FOR ACTIVE AIR SUSPENSION SYSTEM IN BUSES TO DRIVE MARKET
• 13.5 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

14 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY VEHICLE TYPE

• 14.1 INTRODUCTION
• 14.2 PASSENGER CARS
  • 14.2.1 USE OF MACPHERSON STRUT IN PASSENGER CARS TO DRIVE MARKET
• 14.3 LCVS
  • 14.3.1 DEMAND FOR MULTILINK ARCHITECTURE TO DRIVE MARKET FOR LCV SUSPENSION
• 14.4 TRUCKS
  • 14.4.1 INCREASED USE OF TRUCKS IN MAJOR REGIONS TO DRIVE NEED FOR LEAF SPRING SUSPENSION
• 14.5 BUSES
  • 14.5.1 AIR SUSPENSION OFFERS MAXIMUM COMFORT TO PASSENGERS
• 14.6 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

15 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION OE MARKET, BY COMPONENT

• 15.1 INTRODUCTION
• 15.2 COIL SPRINGS
• 15.3 AIR SPRINGS
• 15.4 SHOCK ABSORBERS
• 15.5 STRUTS
• 15.6 CONTROL ARMS
• 15.7 RUBBER BUSHINGS
• 15.8 LEAF SPRINGS
• 15.9 LINK STABILIZERS/SWAY BARS
• 15.10 BALL JOINTS
• 15.11 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

16 ELECTRIC & HYBRID PASSENGER CAR SUSPENSION MARKET, BY ARCHITECTURE & REGION

• 16.1 INTRODUCTION
• 16.2 ELECTRIC & HYBRID SUSPENSION MARKET FOR BEVS, PHEVS, AND FCEVS, BY ARCHITECTURE
  • 16.2.1 BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLES (BEVS), BY ARCHITECTURE
    • 16.2.1.1 Active suspension systems to enhance driving performance of BEVs
  • 16.2.2 PLUG-IN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES (PHEVS), BY ARCHITECTURE
    • 16.2.2.1 Demand for maximum comfort and safety in PHEVs to drive market for advanced suspension systems
  • 16.2.3 FUEL CELL ELECTRIC VEHICLES (FCEVS), BY ARCHITECTURE
    • 16.2.3.1 Limited demand for FCEVs due to infrastructure challenges
• 16.3 REGIONAL ELECTRIC & HYBRID SUSPENSION MARKET, BY PROPULSION
  • 16.3.1 ASIA PACIFIC, BY PROPULSION
    • 16.3.1.1 Advancements in battery technology and government support to drive BEV sales
  • 16.3.2 EUROPE, BY PROPULSION
    • 16.3.2.1 Demand for emission-free vehicles to drive electric & hybrid vehicle suspension market
  • 16.3.3 NORTH AMERICA, BY PROPULSION
    • 16.3.3.1 Technological advancements to fuel demand for advanced suspension systems
  • 16.3.4 INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

17 ELECTRIC & HYBRID HCV SUSPENSION MARKET, BY VEHICLE TYPE

• 17.1 INTRODUCTION
• 17.2 REGIONAL ELECTRIC & HYBRID HCV SUSPENSION MARKET, BY VEHICLE TYPE
  • 17.2.1 ASIA PACIFIC, BY VEHICLE TYPE
    • 17.2.1.1 Need to scale zero-emission bus deployment in urban mega-cities through policy and charging integration to drive market
  • 17.2.2 EUROPE, BY VEHICLE TYPE
    • 17.2.2.1 Need to expand zero-emission urban freight and public transit zones to drive fleet conversion
  • 17.2.3 NORTH AMERICA, BY VEHICLE TYPE
    • 17.2.3.1 Need for leveraging federal incentives to scale zero-emission freight corridors and transit fleets to drive market
• 17.3 ELECTRIC & HYBRID HCV SUSPENSION MARKET, BY ARCHITECTURE
  • 17.3.1 ELECTRIC & HYBRID TRUCKS
  • 17.3.2 ELECTRIC & HYBRID BUSES
• 17.4 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

18 OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY APPLICATION

• 18.1 INTRODUCTION
• 18.2 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
  • 18.2.1 INCREASED DEMAND FOR OPERATOR COMFORT AND EQUIPMENT STABILITY TO DRIVE MARKET
• 18.3 AGRICULTURAL TRACTORS
  • 18.3.1 RISING FARM MECHANIZATION ACTIVITIES TO DRIVE DEMAND FOR SUSPENSION IN TRACTORS
• 18.4 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

19 ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY REGION

• 19.1 INTRODUCTION
• 19.2 ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE SUSPENSION MARKET ARCHITECTURE TYPES, BY REGION
  • 19.2.1 MACPHERSON STRUT
    • 19.2.1.1 Growing penetration of ATVs in agricultural practices and sports activities to drive market
  • 19.2.2 DOUBLE WISHBONE
    • 19.2.2.1 Double wishbone suspension systems offer maximum comfort while traveling
  • 19.2.3 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

20 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY REGION

• 20.1 INTRODUCTION
• 20.2 ASIA PACIFIC
  • 20.2.1 CHINA
    • 20.2.1.1 Demand for MacPherson strut architecture to drive growth
  • 20.2.2 INDIA
    • 20.2.2.1 Growing vehicle production and expanding domestic demand for comfort and safety to drive market
  • 20.2.3 JAPAN
    • 20.2.3.1 Need for electrification and premium vehicle development to drive market
  • 20.2.4 SOUTH KOREA
    • 20.2.4.1 Strong push toward independent suspension architecture to drive market
  • 20.2.5 REST OF ASIA PACIFIC
• 20.3 NORTH AMERICA
  • 20.3.1 US
    • 20.3.1.1 Preference for SUVs and light trucks to boost growth
  • 20.3.2 MEXICO
    • 20.3.2.1 Strong vehicle production and export base to lead market
  • 20.3.3 CANADA
    • 20.3.3.1 Increasing adoption of advanced suspension technologies to boost growth
• 20.4 EUROPE
  • 20.4.1 GERMANY
    • 20.4.1.1 Rapid technological advancements to drive market
  • 20.4.2 UK
    • 20.4.2.1 Strong base of premium and performance vehicle manufacturers to boost market
  • 20.4.3 FRANCE
    • 20.4.3.1 Notable transition toward electrified and comfort-oriented vehicle platforms to boost growth
  • 20.4.4 SPAIN
    • 20.4.4.1 Increasing production of compact cars, SUVs, and light commercial vehicles to drive market
  • 20.4.5 ITALY
    • 20.4.5.1 Increased demand for air suspension architecture in special application trucks to drive market
  • 20.4.6 RUSSIA
    • 20.4.6.1 Rise in production of SUVs, LCVs, and off-road vehicles to boost market
  • 20.4.7 REST OF EUROPE
• 20.5 REST OF THE WORLD (ROW)
  • 20.5.1 BRAZIL
    • 20.5.1.1 Well-established automotive manufacturing base and strong domestic demand to drive market
  • 20.5.2 SOUTH AFRICA
    • 20.5.2.1 Country's expanding and aging vehicle fleet to drive market
  • 20.5.3 IRAN

21 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 21.1 INTRODUCTION
• 21.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN
• 21.3 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS, 2024
• 21.4 REVENUE ANALYSIS, 2020-2024
• 21.5 COMPANY VALUATION AND FINANCIAL METRICS
• 21.6 BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARISON
• 21.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
  • 21.7.1 STARS
  • 21.7.2 EMERGING LEADERS
  • 21.7.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
  • 21.7.4 PARTICIPANTS
  • 21.7.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT
    • 21.7.5.1 Company footprint
    • 21.7.5.2 Region footprint
    • 21.7.5.3 System footprint
    • 21.7.5.4 Actuation footprint
    • 21.7.5.5 Vehicle type footprint
• 21.8 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES, 2024
  • 21.8.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
  • 21.8.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
  • 21.8.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
  • 21.8.4 STARTING BLOCKS
  • 21.8.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING
    • 21.8.5.1 List of startups/SMEs
    • 21.8.5.2 Competitive benchmarking of SMEs
• 21.9 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
  • 21.9.1 PRODUCT LAUNCHES
  • 21.9.2 DEALS
  • 21.9.3 EXPANSIONS
  • 21.9.4 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS

22 COMPANY PROFILES

• 22.1 KEY PLAYERS
  • 22.1.1 ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG
    • 22.1.1.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.1.2 Products offered
    • 22.1.1.3 Recent developments
      • 22.1.1.3.1 Product launches/developments
      • 22.1.1.3.2 Expansions
    • 22.1.1.4 MnM view
      • 22.1.1.4.1 Key strengths
      • 22.1.1.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 22.1.1.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 22.1.2 HYUNDAI MOBIS
    • 22.1.2.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.2.2 Products offered
    • 22.1.2.3 Recent developments
      • 22.1.2.3.1 Product launches/developments
    • 22.1.2.4 MnM view
      • 22.1.2.4.1 Key strengths
      • 22.1.2.4.2 Weaknesses and competitive threats
      • 22.1.2.4.3 Strategic choices
  • 22.1.3 TENNECO INC.
    • 22.1.3.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.3.2 Products offered
    • 22.1.3.3 Recent developments
      • 22.1.3.3.1 Product launches/developments
    • 22.1.3.4 MnM view
      • 22.1.3.4.1 Key strengths
      • 22.1.3.4.2 Weaknesses and competitive threats
      • 22.1.3.4.3 Strategic choices
  • 22.1.4 THYSSENKRUPP AG
    • 22.1.4.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.4.2 Products offered
    • 22.1.4.3 Recent developments
      • 22.1.4.3.1 Deals
    • 22.1.4.4 MnM view
      • 22.1.4.4.1 Key strengths
      • 22.1.4.4.2 Weaknesses and competitive threats
      • 22.1.4.4.3 Strategic choices
  • 22.1.5 DANA LIMITED
    • 22.1.5.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.5.2 Products offered
    • 22.1.5.3 Recent developments
      • 22.1.5.3.1 Product launches/developments
    • 22.1.5.4 MnM view
      • 22.1.5.4.1 Key strengths
      • 22.1.5.4.2 Weaknesses and competitive threats
      • 22.1.5.4.3 Strategic choices
  • 22.1.6 MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.
    • 22.1.6.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.6.2 Products offered
    • 22.1.6.3 MnM view
      • 22.1.6.3.1 Key strengths
      • 22.1.6.3.2 Strategic choices
      • 22.1.6.3.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 22.1.7 CONTINENTAL AG
    • 22.1.7.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.7.2 Products offered
  • 22.1.8 BWI GROUP
    • 22.1.8.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.8.2 Products offered
    • 22.1.8.3 Recent developments
      • 22.1.8.3.1 Expansions
      • 22.1.8.3.2 Deals
  • 22.1.9 KYB CORPORATION
    • 22.1.9.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.9.2 Products offered
    • 22.1.9.3 MnM view
      • 22.1.9.3.1 Key strengths
      • 22.1.9.3.2 Strategic choices
      • 22.1.9.3.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 22.1.10 HL MANDO CORPORATION
    • 22.1.10.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.10.2 Products offered
  • 22.1.11 MERITOR, INC.
    • 22.1.11.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.11.2 Products offered
  • 22.1.12 HENDRICKSON USA, L.L.C.
    • 22.1.12.1 Business overview
    • 22.1.12.2 Products offered
    • 22.1.12.3 Recent developments
      • 22.1.12.3.1 Product launches/developments
      • 22.1.12.3.2 Deals
• 22.2 OTHER KEY PLAYERS
  • 22.2.1 ASTEMO, LTD
  • 22.2.2 SOGEFI
  • 22.2.3 EIBACH
  • 22.2.4 GESTAMP
  • 22.2.5 SIDEM
  • 22.2.6 PEDDERS SUSPENSION & BRAKES
  • 22.2.7 RTS
  • 22.2.8 YSS SUSPENSION
  • 22.2.9 BELLTECH
  • 22.2.10 SKYJACKER SUSPENSIONS
  • 22.2.11 MULTIMATIC INC
  • 22.2.12 KING SHOCKS
  • 22.2.13 FOX FACTORY, INC.
  • 22.2.14 RANCHO SUSPENSION
  • 22.2.15 TEIN USA.
  • 22.2.16 AIR LIFT COMPANY
  • 22.2.17 MOOG INC.

23 RECOMMENDATIONS BY MARKETSANDMARKETS

• 23.1 ASIA PACIFIC TO LEAD AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET
• 23.2 GROWING DEMAND FOR AIR SUSPENSION SYSTEMS: KEY FOCUS AREAS
• 23.3 CONCLUSION

24 APPENDIX

• 24.1 INSIGHTS FROM INDUSTRY EXPERTS
• 24.2 DISCUSSION GUIDE
• 24.3 KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS' SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
• 24.4 CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
  • 24.4.1 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY ICE VEHICLE TYPE (COUNTRY LEVEL)
    • 24.4.1.1 Passenger cars
      • 24.4.1.1.1 Front suspension, by architecture
        • 24.4.1.1.1.1 Macpherson strut
        • 24.4.1.1.1.2 Double wishbone
        • 24.4.1.1.1.3 Multilink
        • 24.4.1.1.1.4 Twist beam/torsion beam
        • 24.4.1.1.1.5 Air suspension
      • 24.4.1.1.2 Rear suspension, by architecture
        • 24.4.1.1.2.1 Macpherson strut
        • 24.4.1.1.2.2 Double wishbone
        • 24.4.1.1.2.3 Multilink
        • 24.4.1.1.2.4 Twist beam/torsion beam
        • 24.4.1.1.2.5 Air suspension
    • 24.4.1.2 LCVs
      • 24.4.1.2.1 Front suspension, by architecture
        • 24.4.1.2.1.1 Macpherson strut
        • 24.4.1.2.1.2 Double wishbone
        • 24.4.1.2.1.3 Multilink
        • 24.4.1.2.1.4 Twist beam/torsion beam
        • 24.4.1.2.1.5 Leaf spring
        • 24.4.1.2.1.6 Air suspension
      • 24.4.1.2.2 Rear suspension, by architecture
        • 24.4.1.2.2.1 Macpherson strut
        • 24.4.1.2.2.2 Double wishbone
        • 24.4.1.2.2.3 Multilink
        • 24.4.1.2.2.4 Twist beam/torsion beam
        • 24.4.1.2.2.5 Leaf spring
        • 24.4.1.2.2.6 Air suspension
    • 24.4.1.3 HCVs
  • 24.4.2 PASSIVE, SEMI-ACTIVE, AND ACTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, BY ARCHITECTURE (COUNTRY LEVEL)
    • 24.4.2.1 Macpherson strut
    • 24.4.2.2 Double wishbone
    • 24.4.2.3 Multilink
    • 24.4.2.4 Twist beam/torsion beam
    • 24.4.2.5 Leaf spring suspension
    • 24.4.2.6 Air suspension
  • 24.4.3 AUTOMOTIVE SUSPENSION MARKET, ELECTRIC & HYBRID VEHICLE (REGIONAL LEVEL), BY PROPULSION
    • 24.4.3.1 BEV
      • 24.4.3.1.1 Front suspension, by architecture
      • 24.4.3.1.2 Rear suspension, by architecture
    • 24.4.3.2 PHEV
      • 24.4.3.2.1 Front suspension, by architecture
      • 24.4.3.2.2 Rear suspension, by architecture
    • 24.4.3.3 FCEV
      • 24.4.3.3.1 Front suspension, by architecture
      • 24.4.3.3.2 Rear suspension, by architecture
  • 24.4.4 OFF-HIGHWAY SUSPENSION MARKET, BY APPLICATION (REGIONAL LEVEL)
    • 24.4.4.1 Construction equipment
      • 24.4.4.1.1 Mechanical
      • 24.4.4.1.2 Pneumatic
      • 24.4.4.1.3 Hydropneumatics
    • 24.4.4.2 Agricultural tractors
      • 24.4.4.2.1 Mechanical
      • 24.4.4.2.2 Pneumatic
      • 24.4.4.2.3 Hydropneumatics
• 24.5 RELATED REPORTS
• 24.6 AUTHOR DETAILS