도메인 네임 시스템(DNS) 방화벽 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the domain name system firewall market size was valued at USD 220.13 million in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 251.87 million in 2026 to reach USD 523.28 million by 2031, at a CAGR of 15.75% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This report is Segmented by Deployment Model (On-Premises, Cloud-Based, and Hybrid), DNS Server Type (Recursive Resolver Firewall, Authoritative DNS Firewall, and More), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises, Mid-Sized Enterprises, and SMEs), Industry Vertical (BFSI, IT and Telecommunications, Government and Defense, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Domain Name System Firewall Market Trends and Insights

Increasing DNS-Layer Attacks Driving Mandatory Security Investments

High-volume reconnaissance, phishing, and distributed denial-of-service assaults are shifting corporate security budgets toward resolver-centric countermeasures. A joint advisory from the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the National Security Agency in March 2025 flagged "fast flux" domain rotation that hides attacker infrastructure behind constantly changing IP addresses, rendering static blocklists obsolete. The technique gained urgency after the Federal Bureau of Investigation dismantled a Russian botnet that hijacked more than one million small-office routers in early 2024, illustrating how ubiquitous DNS traffic can be weaponized. Infoblox's 2025 DNS Threat Report logged a 37% rise in tunneling events, confirming that adversaries now view DNS as a low-friction command-and-control pathway. Board-level cyber-risk discussions increasingly treat protective DNS as a prerequisite for cyber-insurance underwriting, compressing procurement cycles from years to quarters.

Rapid Migration to Multi-Cloud and Hybrid IT Architectures

Enterprises juggling workloads across Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, and colocation sites struggle to keep consistent domain policies. IBM's NS1 Connect white paper documented that financial firms maintain at least two external DNS providers to eliminate single points of failure, a practice vindicated when a major platform suffered a six-hour recursive outage in mid-2024. Performance-critical apps, from algorithmic trading to real-time patient telemetry, still depend on local resolvers, so organizations favor hybrid designs that blend on-premises appliances with cloud orchestration. Cisco addressed those latency and sovereignty concerns in April 2026 by rolling out localized DNS firewall appliances for Gulf Cooperation Council markets while tying them back to its Umbrella cloud layer for a unified policy push. The architectural sprawl fuels demand for management consoles that broadcast threat feeds and response-policy zones across disparate resolver instances in near real time. Vendors that can automate this federation without degrading query performance are winning disproportionate wallet share.

High Replacement Cost for Legacy Recursive Servers in Large Incumbents

Financial and telecom giants that standardized on open-source resolvers such as BIND face capital outlays topping USD 500,000 when migrating to commercial firewalls. Geographic clusters built for redundancy house hundreds of anycast nodes that cannot simply be "forklifted" into new hardware. NIST's Special Publication 800-81 Revision 3 cautions that retrofitting DNSSEC and response-policy zones can drag on for 12-18 months in brownfield environments. During the transition window, teams must dual-maintain old and new infrastructure, inflating labor costs and elongating change-control windows. The budgetary shock is especially acute in manufacturing and retail, where thin operating margins leave minimal headroom for seven-figure security projects.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Regulatory Mandates for Zero-Trust and Secure Access Service Edge Frameworks
2. Growing Use of DNS Tunneling for Command-and-Control in Edge IoT Fleets
3. Lack of Skilled DNS Security Professionals

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Hybrid setups accounted for a material slice of 2025 spending and are growing at 16.43% CAGR, outpacing the broader Domain Name System Firewall market. Organizations first gravitated to cloud-based firewalls for quick wins, 58.91% of outlays in 2025, but discovered that added query hops inflate latency by 10-20 milliseconds, an unacceptable drag on trading algorithms and clinical imaging systems. Consequently, buyers now mesh lightweight on-premises resolvers with cloud orchestration to retain sub-millisecond response while centralizing policy control. EfficientIP's 2025 survey found that 62% of firms above 10,000 employees already run such dual architectures, and NIS2 resilience mandates reinforce the trend. The Domain Name System Firewall market size benefits because buyers procure both subscriptions and appliance hardware instead of choosing one or the other.

A second growth lever is sovereign-cloud regulation. Saudi Arabia's Salam Secure DNS keeps all logs within national borders while still accepting threat-feed pushes from vendor clouds, providing a playbook for other Gulf markets. Cloudflare Gateway illustrates the opposite end of the spectrum: more than 15,000 enterprises without legacy gear leaped straight into pure cloud DNS in 2025. Still, as edge sites proliferate, caching forwarders will remain indispensable for branch offices where bandwidth is scarce. Whether orchestrated centrally or run stand-alone, resolver diversity is now a compliance requirement rather than an architectural preference.

Recursive resolver engines remained the workhorse in 2025, controlling 38.45% of the Domain Name System Firewall market share because every endpoint query begins there. Yet authoritative-layer defenses are climbing at a 15.95% CAGR, propelled by SaaS vendors and CDNs fending off terabit-scale reflection floods. Akamai logged a 71% spike in such assaults during 1H 2025, forcing operators to deploy rate limiting and DNSSEC validation at the zone apex. New architectural blueprints now recommend pairing resolver and authoritative filters in a shared policy mesh, moving the Domain Name System Firewall market closer to a unified control-plane vision.

VeriSign's daily query load of 183 billion illustrates the throughput requirement that authoritative engines must satisfy without false positives. Neustar and F5 have responded with machine-learning classifiers that flag anomalous volume bursts or geo anomalies in sub-second intervals. The Internet Engineering Task Force's draft Protective DNS framework further cements feature parity guidelines, ensuring vendor differentiation skews toward analytics depth rather than basic block-and-allow lists. With SaaS adoption still climbing, authoritative firewalls should preserve their growth premium well into the next decade even as recursive spending stays robust.

Geography Analysis

North America generated 42.56% of 2025 receipts after the U.S. Protective DNS initiative funneled threat-fed resolver services into 101 federal agencies. Mature cyber budgets, plus proximity to hyperscale clouds and managed security innovators, keep the region ahead on absolute spend. Canada's Center for Cyber Security echoed the push in 2025 by advising provincial health systems to harden recursive infrastructure, and Mexico's regulators compelled banks to monitor DNS following 2024 hijacking incidents.

Asia-Pacific, tracking a 15.92% CAGR, tops the velocity charts. Japan earmarked JPY 4.93 billion (USD 33 million) for university and utility resolver rollouts, while India's CERT-In processed 2.944 million incidents in 2025 and doubled down on an AI-driven malicious-domain detection grid. South Korea's KISA plugged EU and U.S. threat intel into its 2025 monitoring stack, illustrating growing cross-regional data sharing. Across ASEAN, ICANN's regional plan boosted DNSSEC workshops, accelerating public-sector adoption.

Europe's trajectory is shaped by NIS2 and DORA, which pull DNS into the core of supply-chain audits. Germany's BSI, the U.K.'s National Cyber Security Center, and sovereign-cloud initiatives in Saudi Arabia and the UAE reinforce the view that resolver policy is now as strategic as firewall policy. Africa and South America still lag in spending, but managed security providers are introducing pay-as-you-go resolver protection that may compress the gap over the next five years.

1. Infoblox Inc.
2. Cloudflare, Inc.
3. Cisco Systems, Inc.
4. Akamai Technologies, Inc.
5. BlueCat Networks, Inc.
6. EfficientIP SAS
7. Neustar Security Solutions, LLC
8. F5, Inc.
9. Men & Mice ehf
10. VeriSign, Inc.
11. DNSFilter, Inc.
12. Comodo Security Solutions, Inc.
13. Enea AB
14. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
15. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
16. Quad9 Foundation
17. Technitium Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
18. FlashStart S.r.l.
19. Secure64 Software Corporation
20. Zscaler, Inc.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Increasing DNS-Layer Attacks Driving Mandatory Security Investments
  • 4.2.2 Rapid Migration to Multi-Cloud and Hybrid IT Architectures
  • 4.2.3 Regulatory Mandates for Zero-Trust and Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Frameworks
  • 4.2.4 Growing Use of DNS Tunneling for Command-and-Control in Edge IoT Fleets
  • 4.2.5 Rise of "Everything over HTTPS" Accelerating Encrypted DNS Adoption
  • 4.2.6 Telecom Operators Monetising DNS Threat-Intel Feeds to Enterprises
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High Replacement Cost for Legacy Recursive Servers in Large Incumbents
  • 4.3.2 Lack of Skilled DNS Security Professionals
  • 4.3.3 Performance Trade-Offs with Encrypted DNS over Satellite Back-Haul Links
  • 4.3.4 Fragmentation of National Root-Server Policies in Sovereign Clouds
• 4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
• 4.8 Assessment of Macroeconomic Trends on the Market

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Deployment Model
  • 5.1.1 On-premises
  • 5.1.2 Cloud-based
  • 5.1.3 Hybrid
• 5.2 By DNS Server Type
  • 5.2.1 Recursive Resolver Firewall
  • 5.2.2 Authoritative DNS Firewall
  • 5.2.3 Caching Forwarder Firewall
• 5.3 By Enterprise Size
  • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises (>=1,000 employees)
  • 5.3.2 Mid-sized Enterprises (100-999 employees)
  • 5.3.3 SMEs (<100 employees)
• 5.4 By Industry Vertical
  • 5.4.1 BFSI
  • 5.4.2 IT and Telecommunications
  • 5.4.3 Government and Defense
  • 5.4.4 Healthcare and Lifesciences
  • 5.4.5 Retail and e-Commerce
  • 5.4.6 Manufacturing
  • 5.4.7 Other Industry Vertical
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 India
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 ASEAN
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.5.5.1.3 Turkey
      • 5.5.5.1.4 Rest of the Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.2 Nigeria
      • 5.5.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Infoblox Inc.
  • 6.4.2 Cloudflare, Inc.
  • 6.4.3 Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • 6.4.4 Akamai Technologies, Inc.
  • 6.4.5 BlueCat Networks, Inc.
  • 6.4.6 EfficientIP SAS
  • 6.4.7 Neustar Security Solutions, LLC
  • 6.4.8 F5, Inc.
  • 6.4.9 Men & Mice ehf
  • 6.4.10 VeriSign, Inc.
  • 6.4.11 DNSFilter, Inc.
  • 6.4.12 Comodo Security Solutions, Inc.
  • 6.4.13 Enea AB
  • 6.4.14 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4.15 Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • 6.4.16 Quad9 Foundation
  • 6.4.17 Technitium Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
  • 6.4.18 FlashStart S.r.l.
  • 6.4.19 Secure64 Software Corporation
  • 6.4.20 Zscaler, Inc.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment