바이오 살선충제 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the bionematicides market size is valued at USD 437 million in 2025 and is anticipated to grow from USD 473 million in 2026 to USD 705 million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 8.3% over 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Product Type (Microbials, Biochemicals, and More), by Mode of Application (Soil, Seed, and More), by Crop (Fruits and Vegetables, Cereals and Grains, and More), by Formulation (Liquid and Dry Granules), by Infestation Type (Root-Knot, Cyst, and More), and by Geography (North America, South America, Asia-Pacific, and More). Market Forecasts are Provided in Value (USD).

Global Bionematicides Market Trends and Insights

Growth in Certified-Organic Farmland

Global certified organic farmland grew from 96 million hectares in 2022 to nearly 99 million hectares in 2024, reflecting steady but slowing growth in organic agriculture, as per FiBL & IFOAM Organics International (2026). Organic standards prohibit synthetic fumigants, prompting growers to adopt biological nematode control. In California's organic vegetable sector, Bacillus firmus and Purpureocillium lilacinum products are standard practice for root-knot suppression. Similar momentum is evident in the European Union, where in 2024, organically farmed land in the European Union reached 18.1 million hectares, accounting for 11.1% of total agricultural land. Organic area expansion has moderated but remains significant. Premium export pricing for residue-free produce is stimulating uptake in Brazil's coffee and India's spice belts.

Global Phase-Out of Highly Toxic Chemical Nematicides

Regulators are steadily withdrawing organophosphate and carbamate nematicides. While the EPA did not cancel nematicide active ingredients in 2026, registration reviews, product withdrawals, and rising compliance costs under FIFRA are gradually limiting the U.S. soil-applied nematicide portfolio. The European Commission maintains strict hazard-based cutoffs that deter re-registration of older fumigants. In 2024 and 2025, China progressed in phasing out high-toxicity pesticides, banning omethoate, carbofuran, methomyl, and aldicarb, effective by December 2025. Planned 2026 bans on phorate and isofenphos-methyl are driving a shift toward microbial nematicides and biopesticides. To support this, MARA approved five new biopesticides in late 2025, promoting green agricultural development. These concurrent moves underpin lasting substitution toward biological alternatives.

Limited Shelf Life and Formulation Stability

Many live microbial products require refrigeration below 10 °C and expire within 12 months, complicating distribution in tropical regions. Dry granules extend viability yet often sacrifice rapid field efficacy. Nano-encapsulation research has extended the viability of entomopathogenic nematodes to 18 months at ambient temperature, but commercial deployment remains limited. Manufacturers face higher spoilage rates in the Asia-Pacific and Africa, where cold storage is scarce. Stability breakthroughs are essential to unlock mass-market penetration.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Lower Research and Registration Cost for Biologicals
2. RNA-Interference Nematicides Enabling Species-Specific Control
3. Farmer Skepticism Over Field-Level Efficacy

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Microbials accounted for the largest share, representing 62% of the 2025 bionematicides market, as Bacillus, Trichoderma, and Purpureocillium strains deliver broad soil colonization and rhizosphere activity. Biochemicals, including azadirachtin and terpenoids, are growing at a fastest 9.4% CAGR through 2026-2031, driven by resistance management goals and shelf-life advantages. Combined microbial-biochemical products are gaining share in premium fruit and vegetable markets where growers accept higher unit costs for season-long control. RNAi platforms such as TYMIRIUM are in early commercial phases, yet declining synthesis expenses should unlock meaningful uptake after 2027. The bionematicides market size for integrated microbial-biochemical products is projected to expand at double-digit rates through the forecast horizon.

Second-generation microbials emphasize metabolite co-production, as illustrated by BASF SE's forthcoming Votivo Prime that couples Bacillus firmus with proprietary metabolites for lesion-nematode suppression. Field trials demonstrated a significant share of egg-hatch inhibition using nano-formulated terpenoids, surpassing fluopyram's. Biochemicals also improve compatibility with drip irrigation systems, where particulate settling hinders the suspension of live cells. RNAi's precision aligns with residue-sensitive export channels because gene silencing compounds degrade into benign nucleotides. Collectively, innovation is steering the bionematicides market toward multi-mode, shelf-stable, and species-specific portfolios.

Soil treatments accounted for the largest share, with 48% of the 2025 bionematicides market size, driven by broadcast and banded applications in heavily infested row crops. Seed treatment is advancing at a fastest 10.1% CAGR through 2026-2031, as multinationals embed biologicals into proprietary coatings that deliver nematode, fungal, and insect protection in one pass. Corteva Agriscience LLC's Lumialza and UPL's NIMAXXA exemplify this bundling strategy that shifts application responsibility to seed providers. Foliar sprays remain niche for ornamentals and protected horticulture, whereas drip-irrigation injection appeals to greenhouse and high-tunnel vegetable producers. The bionematicides market for seed-treatment products is forecast to overtake soil-treatment products by 2030 as adoption accelerates in soybean, corn, and cotton systems.

Seed coating reduces dosage variability and enhances early-root colonization, boosting field consistency and farmer confidence. In no-till systems, seed treatments avoid soil-incorporation constraints and align with conservation farming practices. Drip injection of biological nematicides in California and Spain is more effective than broadcast sprays because it targets the rhizosphere. Drip systems provide a moist environment supporting strains like Purpureocillium lilacinum, achieving nematode reduction rates of 56% to 77% in field trials. Equipment compatibility and labor savings further incentivize the shift toward on-seed delivery. As proprietary stacks proliferate, independent formulators may face restricted market access unless they partner with major seed companies.

Geography Analysis

North America generated roughly 40% of 2025 global revenue, led by the United States, where expedited Environmental Protection Agency biopesticide reviews and large organic vegetable operations underpin adoption. In California, 12,000-15,000 hectares of organic tomatoes and 10,000 hectares of organic lettuce are grown. Purpureocillium lilacinum is widely used to control root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) as part of an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy with resistant varieties and crop rotation. Canada is scaling biologicals in potatoes and greenhouse vegetables under sustainable-agriculture grants, while Mexico's protected-agriculture clusters are trialing drip-injected microbials for peppers and cucumbers. The bionematicides market in the region benefits from harmonized residue standards under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which lowers cross-border registration friction. However, farmer skepticism persists in some Midwestern row-crop systems where chemical fumigants remain legal and inexpensive.

Asia-Pacific is on track for an 8.5% CAGR as China and India expand subsidies for bio-inputs to satisfy export buyers' residue limits. China placed five chemical nematicides on restricted schedules in 2025, nudging growers toward Bacillus-based options with lighter data packages. India promotes biological pest management through the National Mission on Natural Farming (NMNF), launched in November 2024 with an outlay of INR 24.81 billion (USD 295 million) for 2025-26. The mission targets 1 crore farmers and 10,000 Bio-input Resource Centers for localized, low-cost biological inputs. Japan's organic vegetable acreage is rising rapidly each year in Hokkaido and Kyushu, driving demand for biologicals including bionematicides that meet Japanese Agricultural Standards. Australia is piloting Pasteuria and Trichoderma solutions for sugarcane and potatoes, but performance is inconsistent under drought conditions.

South America has recorded a rapid growth as Brazilian soybean and sugarcane growers integrate biological nematode management into no-till systems. Biological adoption covered a significant share of Brazil's 45-million-hectare soybean area in 2025, driven by European Union import tolerances. Argentina's wheat and corn producers leverage existing seed-treatment infrastructure to test Bacillus seed coatings, aiming to reduce in-furrow input costs. The European Union is projected to post a rapid CAGR under the Farm-to-Fork pesticide-reduction agenda. Germany, France, and Spain are front-runners in the use of vegetables and fruits. The Middle East and Africa are seeing significant growth in greenhouse vegetable and export horticulture, where residue-compliant pest control is in demand, though high prices and weak cold chains are tempering broader uptake.

1. BASF SE
2. Bayer AG
3. Syngenta Crop Protection AG
4. Corteva Agriscience LLC
5. FMC Corporation
6. UPL Limited
7. Valent BioSciences LLC
8. Certis Biologicals LLC
9. Pro Farm Group Inc.
10. Koppert B.V.
11. Nufarm Limited
12. Isagro S.p.A.
13. STK Bio-AG Technologies Ltd.
14. Novonesis A/S
15. Lallemand Inc.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Growth in certified-organic farmland
  • 4.2.2 Global phase-out of highly toxic chemical nematicides
  • 4.2.3 Lower research and registration cost for biologicals
  • 4.2.4 RNA-interference nematicides enabling species-specific control
  • 4.2.5 Bundling of bionematicides in commercial seed-treatment stacks
  • 4.2.6 Soil-microbiome diagnostics optimizing application timing
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Limited shelf life and formulation stability
  • 4.3.2 Farmer skepticism over field-level efficacy
  • 4.3.3 Patent thickets around key microbial strains
  • 4.3.4 Lack of harmonized import-tolerance standards for residues
• 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.5 Technological Outlook
• 4.6 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Product Type
  • 5.1.1 Microbials
  • 5.1.2 Biochemicals
  • 5.1.3 Integrated/Combined
  • 5.1.4 Next-Generation RNAi Formulations
• 5.2 By Mode of Application
  • 5.2.1 Soil Treatment
  • 5.2.2 Seed Treatment
  • 5.2.3 Foliar Spray
  • 5.2.4 Drip-Irrigation Injection
• 5.3 By Crop
  • 5.3.1 Fruits and Vegetables
  • 5.3.2 Cereals and Grains
  • 5.3.3 Oilseeds and Pulses
  • 5.3.4 Turf, Ornamentals and Forage
• 5.4 By Formulation
  • 5.4.1 Liquid Suspensions
  • 5.4.2 Dry Granules and Wettable Powders
• 5.5 By Infestation Type
  • 5.5.1 Root-knot Nematodes
  • 5.5.2 Cyst Nematodes
  • 5.5.3 Lesion Nematodes
  • 5.5.4 Others (Stubby-root, Reniform)
• 5.6 By Geography
  • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.1.4 Rest of North America
  • 5.6.2 South America
    • 5.6.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.6.3 Europe
    • 5.6.3.1 Germany
    • 5.6.3.2 France
    • 5.6.3.3 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.3.4 Italy
    • 5.6.3.5 Spain
    • 5.6.3.6 Russia
    • 5.6.3.7 Rest of Europe
  • 5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4.1 China
    • 5.6.4.2 India
    • 5.6.4.3 Japan
    • 5.6.4.4 Australia
    • 5.6.4.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.6.5 Middle East
    • 5.6.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.6.5.2 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.6.5.3 Rest of Middle East
  • 5.6.6 Africa
    • 5.6.6.1 South Africa
    • 5.6.6.2 Kenya
    • 5.6.6.3 Rest of Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (Includes Global-level Overview, Market-level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 BASF SE
  • 6.4.2 Bayer AG
  • 6.4.3 Syngenta Crop Protection AG
  • 6.4.4 Corteva Agriscience LLC
  • 6.4.5 FMC Corporation
  • 6.4.6 UPL Limited
  • 6.4.7 Valent BioSciences LLC
  • 6.4.8 Certis Biologicals LLC
  • 6.4.9 Pro Farm Group Inc.
  • 6.4.10 Koppert B.V.
  • 6.4.11 Nufarm Limited
  • 6.4.12 Isagro S.p.A.
  • 6.4.13 STK Bio-AG Technologies Ltd.
  • 6.4.14 Novonesis A/S
  • 6.4.15 Lallemand Inc.

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook