흡수성 임플란트 디바이스 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the absorbable nasal implant devices market size is projected to expand from USD 0.65 billion in 2025 and USD 0.7 billion in 2026 to USD 1.03 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 8.09% between 2026 to 2031.

This report is Segmented by Product Type (Absorbable Nasal Dressings, Drug-Eluting Sinus Implants, Absorbable Nasal Valve Support Implants, and More), Application (Post-Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery, Epistaxis Management, and More), End User (Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgery Centers, and More), and Geography (Europe, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Absorbable Nasal Implant Devices Market Trends and Insights

Rising CRD Prevalence And Surgical Volumes Sustain Demand For In-Sinus Dressings And Implants

The growing prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis and stable sinus surgery volumes support consistent device utilization in both hospital and ambulatory settings. Postoperative inflammation control and ostial patency maintenance are central goals of care after endoscopic sinus procedures, which have kept drug-eluting and non-drug absorbable implants in routine consideration for postoperative management. Evidence summaries from U.S. clinical and payer reviews report reductions in postoperative interventions when mometasone-eluting implants are placed, which reinforces a data-driven rationale for surgeon adoption.

Specialty societies highlight the role of office-based and ambulatory workflows for select rhinology interventions, which expands the procedural sites where absorbable implants can be used. As the absorbable nasal implant devices market matures, clinicians are combining in-sinus implants with optimized topical steroid regimens to lower revision risk in recurrent polyp cohorts. This steady procedural backdrop helps the absorbable nasal implant devices market sustain predictable demand through the forecast period.

Shift To Office/ASC Rhinology Increases Adoption Of In-Office Implants And Dressings

Ambulatory and office settings are gaining share in rhinology because minimally invasive techniques and local anesthesia can compress care timelines while maintaining patient comfort. SINUVA is indicated for in-office endoscopic placement and delivers mometasone furoate locally over 90 days, which allows clinics to treat recurrent polyps without an operating-room slot or general anesthesia. Coding clarity through CPT 30468 for nasal valve repair defines a billable pathway for submucosal lateral wall implants, which reduces uncertainty for clinic-based valve support procedures. Payer updates that define medical-necessity criteria for sinus surgery and related implants give facilities a clearer view of documentation and coverage expectations for device-enabled care plans.

New office-optimized implants, such as bioabsorbable devices designed for simple one-pass placement and no removal, improve workflow predictability and reduce follow-up burden for busy ENT practices. The Absorbable nasal implant devices market is therefore positioned to benefit from the migration of appropriate cases to outpatient and clinic settings where device-enabled protocols have clear time and cost advantages.

Payer Policies Labeling Nasal Valve Implants/Drug Eluting Stents Investigational Limit Coverage

Commercial payer policies in 2026 classify drug-eluting sinus implants as investigational, citing small sample sizes, limited follow-up, and a lack of direct comparisons against standard topical steroid therapy, which restricts coverage in key U.S. plans. The same dynamic affects absorbable lateral nasal implants for valve collapse, where several plans categorize the technology as investigational even as clinical studies show symptomatic benefit, which complicates patient access and suppresses utilization growth. Investigational labeling drives benefit exclusions in many employer-sponsored plans and shifts costs to patients, which in turn dampens the economics for clinics contemplating broader adoption outside surgical bundles. Other plans maintain investigational status for both absorbable nasal implants and radiofrequency procedures targeted at the nasal valve, emphasizing limitations such as loss to follow-up and lack of head-to-head comparisons with other structural surgeries.

The policy environment remains fluid, which requires device manufacturers to invest in outcomes research and payer education that addresses evidence gaps in a way that aligns with each plan's coverage criteria. This variability slows near-term growth in the absorbable nasal implant devices market despite surgeon interest and supportive real-world experiences.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Clinical Evidence For Steroid-Eluting And Valve-Support Implants Improves Outcomes And Reduces Revisions
2. Established Coding (E.G., CPT 30468) And Device Approvals Enable Procedure Standardization
3. Adverse Events/Foreign-Body Reactions And Extrusion Risks Necessitate Careful Selection

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Drug-eluting sinus implants captured 33.60% of absorbable nasal implant devices market share in 2025 and absorbable nasal valve support implants are projected to grow at a 10.86% CAGR from 2026 through 2031, reflecting strong clinician confidence in local corticosteroid delivery for postoperative inflammation control. Evidence summarized for payer decisions shows that steroid-eluting devices reduce postoperative interventions and systemic steroid use compared to non-drug controls, which reinforces their role as core adjuncts after sinus surgery. The PROPEL family delivers mometasone furoate via a bioabsorbable scaffold and has labeling that details elution profiles designed for early healing phases, which anchors clinical utility in the first month after surgery. In-office mometasone-eluting implants target patients with recurrent nasal polyps after prior surgery, providing a 90-day local steroid source to defer or avoid revision procedures for select candidates.

Nondrug absorbable dressings remain essential for septoplasty, rhinoplasty, and sinus procedures where surgeons select degradation timelines that match healing expectations to reduce discomfort and clinic workload. Bioabsorbable spacers and septal splints meet more specialized needs like perforation repair or donor-site coverage in complex reconstructions, which supports premium pricing per case in niche indications. Supply localization in China and India strengthens global availability of compliant absorbable dressings, which protects against logistics shocks and keeps cost-to-serve attractive for public and private hospitals in price-sensitive markets.

Geography Analysis

North America held 41.80% in 2025 as operating-room and clinic-based protocols normalize device use despite payer variability for select indications. U.S. outpatient payment updates that define device-intensive sinus procedures help facilities plan implant utilization within bundles, which supports continued adoption in hospitals and ASCs. Coding and coverage clarity for defined clinical scenarios, including in-office placement for recurrent polyps after prior surgery, supports claims predictability in targeted use cases for facility-based care teams. Specialty societies and payer policy updates provide guardrails that surgeons and administrators use to shape postoperative plans, which support steady demand in the absorbable nasal implant devices market. As coding, training, and outcomes data converge, clinical leaders in the region continue to integrate steroid-eluting and absorbable structural devices into standardized pathways that prioritize patient comfort and reduced revision risk.

Europe demonstrates solid adoption supported by a mature regulatory environment and a strong base of ENT centers that can standardize protocols at scale. Pan-European launches proceed under harmonized regulations that prioritize safety and post-market surveillance for absorbable Class III devices, which aligns with provider expectations for long-term outcomes tracking. Leading markets such as France, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain provide an installed base of experienced rhinologists who are familiar with both drug-eluting and nondrug absorbable options, which supports methodical expansion of device-enabled postoperative care. Collaboration across academic and clinical sites supports investigator-initiated research, surgeon training, and clinical audits that reinforce the role of absorbable implants in symptom control and revision reduction in appropriate cohorts. In this environment, the absorbable nasal implant devices market advances through disciplined procurement and surgeon-led protocols that emphasize consistent outcomes across public and private hospitals.

Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region with a projected 12.24% CAGR through 2031 as domestic manufacturing and expanding ENT infrastructure increase availability and affordability. Certified manufacturers in China and India supply absorbable dressings and related products to regional and export markets, which reduces logistics risk and supports public-sector procurement at competitive price points. ENT capacity expansion in tier-2 and tier-3 cities drives demand for absorbable dressings and supports adoption of office-optimized implants in private clinics that serve growing middle-income populations. As disposable income and patient awareness rise, ENT providers integrate absorbable implants into postoperative and in-office protocols that emphasize comfort, fewer follow-up procedures, and local therapy for symptom control. The Absorbable nasal implant devices market therefore benefits from volume growth in Asia-Pacific that complements steady adoption in North America and Europe, balancing premium drug-eluting implants with cost-effective absorbable dressings to match local purchasing power and care models.

1. Abbott Laboratories
2. Aegis Lifesciences
3. Boston Scientific
4. Conmed
5. Cook Group
6. GELITA
7. Globus Medical
8. Hemostasis
9. INNOVIA MEDICAL
10. Karl Storz
11. Lyra Therapeutics
12. Mascia Brunelli S.p.a.
13. Medtronic
14. Meril Life Sciences
15. Regenity
16. Smiths Group
17. Stryker

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Rising CRD Prevalence and Surgical Volumes Sustain Demand for In-Sinus Dressings and Implants
  • 4.2.2 Shift to Office/ASC Rhinology Increases Adoption of In-Office Implants and Dressings
  • 4.2.3 Clinical Evidence for Steroid-Eluting and Valve-Support Implants Improves Outcomes and Reduces Revisions
  • 4.2.4 Established Coding (E.G., CPT30468) and Device Approvals Enable Procedure Standardization
  • 4.2.5 Six-Month Programmable Drug-Eluting Platforms (Next-Gen Implants) Expand Addressable Pool
  • 4.2.6 Supply Localization in Asia And India for Absorbable Dressings Lowers Cost-To-Serve
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Payer Policies Labeling Nasal Valve Implants/Drug-Eluting Stents Investigational Limit Coverage
  • 4.3.2 Adverse Events/Foreign-Body Reactions and Extrusion Risks Necessitate Careful Selection
  • 4.3.3 Biologics for CRSWNP Shift Some Candidates Away from Implant-Based Therapy
  • 4.3.4 Office/ASC Reimbursement Variability and Lack of Device-Intensive Status Pressure Margins
• 4.4 Supply-Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porters Five Forces
  • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.7.5 Industry Rivalry

5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Values, USD)

• 5.1 By Product Type
  • 5.1.1 Absorbable Nasal Dressings
  • 5.1.2 Drug-eluting Sinus Implants
  • 5.1.3 Absorbable Nasal Valve Support Implants
  • 5.1.4 Absorbable Sinonasal Spacers
  • 5.1.5 Others (Bioabsorbable Sinonasal Repair Grafts, Absorbable Septal Splints etc.)
• 5.2 By Application
  • 5.2.1 Post-Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
  • 5.2.2 Epistaxis Management
  • 5.2.3 CRS with Nasal Polyps Drug Delivery
  • 5.2.4 Nasal Valve Collapse Support
  • 5.2.5 Septal Perforation / Donor-site Repair
  • 5.2.6 Others (Post-Traumatic Repair, Iatrogenic Sinonasal Repair)
• 5.3 By End User
  • 5.3.1 Hospitals
  • 5.3.2 Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs)
  • 5.3.3 Specialty Clinics
  • 5.3.4 Others (Academic Institues, Research Institutes)
• 5.4 By Geography
  • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.4.2 Europe
    • 5.4.2.1 Germany
    • 5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.2.3 France
    • 5.4.2.4 Italy
    • 5.4.2.5 Spain
    • 5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.3.1 China
    • 5.4.3.2 India
    • 5.4.3.3 Japan
    • 5.4.3.4 Australia
    • 5.4.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.4.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.4.1 GCC
    • 5.4.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
  • 5.4.5 South America
    • 5.4.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of South America

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Market Share Analysis
• 6.3 Company Profiles {(includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)}
  • 6.3.1 Abbott Laboratories
  • 6.3.2 Aegis Lifesciences
  • 6.3.3 Boston Scientific Corporation
  • 6.3.4 Conmed Corporation
  • 6.3.5 Cook Medical
  • 6.3.6 GELITA
  • 6.3.7 Globus Medical, Inc.
  • 6.3.8 Hemostasis LLC
  • 6.3.9 INNOVIA MEDICAL
  • 6.3.10 Karl Storz
  • 6.3.11 Lyra Therapeutics
  • 6.3.12 Mascia Brunelli S.p.a.
  • 6.3.13 Medtronic
  • 6.3.14 Meril Life Sciences
  • 6.3.15 Regenity
  • 6.3.16 Smith+Nephew
  • 6.3.17 Stryker

7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-space & unmet-need assessment