포도 수확기 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the grape harvesting machinery market size is anticipated to increase from USD 1.31 billion in 2025 to USD 1.42 billion in 2026 and reach USD 2.17 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 8.9% during 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Harvester Type (Self-Propelled, Trailed or Towed, and More), by Mode of Operation (Manual, Assisted or Precision-Guided, and More), by Power Source (Diesel, Hybrid, and Electric), by Vineyard Size ( Small Vineyards (Below 50 Hectares), and More), and by Geography (North America, South America, Europe, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value in USD.

Global Grape Harvesting Machinery Market Trends and Insights

Labor-Shortage Driven Mechanization Surge

Labor shortages in vineyard operations are becoming a persistent challenge across major wine-producing regions, driving the adoption of mechanized grape harvesting solutions. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported rising H-2A certifications in 2025 and wage inflation that outpaced other farm sectors. Australia experienced contract-harvesting fees of USD 345 (AUD 525) per hour in 2025, dwarfing hand-picking costs and accelerating the purchase of automated pickers. Germany's 2025 harvest fell 16% below the ten-year average due to crew shortages, prompting traditional estates to turn to machinery. Premium properties in Napa Valley, California, United States, adopted night mechanical picking in 2025 to address labor shortages and maintain fruit acidity. With labor costs rising faster than grape prices, automated solutions have become critical to ensuring profitability.

Vineyard Consolidation Among Large Producers

Consolidation shifts demand from thousands of small owners to a few capital-intensive buyers. In the United States, the Wine Group acquired 6,600 acres from Constellation Brands in June 2025, expanding its mechanized fleet requirement . Atlas Vineyard Management, headquartered in California, United States, acquired Results Partners, based in Oregon, United States, during the same month. This acquisition expanded its managed acreage in Oregon to 9,000, facilitating multi-unit harvester contracts. Larger estates are focusing on standardizing brands, requiring uniform data interfaces, and advocating for autonomous features to mitigate seasonal labor demands. As mergers progress, order volumes are increasingly concentrated on high-capacity platforms equipped with advanced sensors.

High Upfront Capital Expenditure

High capital requirements hinder the adoption of grape harvesting machinery, especially for small, fragmented vineyard operators. Entry-level self-propelled harvesters cost around USD 80,000, while advanced models exceed USD 400,000, limiting affordability for small-scale growers. In Europe, where over half of vineyards span less than 1 hectare, low machinery utilization and return on investment persist despite subsidy programs. Underdeveloped rental and contractor-based services in many regions outside mechanized markets, such as California, the United States, and Australia, further slow adoption. High costs and limited financing continue to restrict the use of mechanized harvesters, particularly in smaller vineyards and traditional wine regions.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Government Mechanization Subsidies and Tax Credits
2. Precision-Viticulture Adoption Requiring Data-Ready Machinery
3. Operator-Skill and Maintenance Complexity

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Self-propelled machines captured 48.5% of the grape harvesting machinery market share in 2025, reflecting productivity advantages for estates above 200 hectares. Tractor-mounted units posted the fastest 11.8% CAGR over 2026-2031 in the grape harvesting machinery market size as growers leverage existing horsepower. Harvesters designed for trailing are now serving a diverse range of farms, enabling equipment rotation across various crops and broadening their utility beyond grapes. High-capacity self-propelled models, such as the Pellenc OPTIMUM XXL80, come equipped with telemetry features that record and upload yield data with every pass. Meanwhile, premium wineries continue to favor self-propelled machines, valuing their ability to reduce tractor compaction and enhance cleaning modules.

Driving the surge in tractor-mounted units is a focus on capital efficiency. Manufacturers, including GREGOIRE and other vineyard equipment providers, are broadening their offerings with ISOBUS-compatible tractor-mounted platforms. These platforms not only align with precision agriculture and digital monitoring needs but also offer lower ownership costs. Manufacturers are focusing on modular platforms and interchangeable shaker technologies compatible with various configurations.

Assisted and precision-guided harvesters held the largest share, 54.2%, in 2025, driven by GPS steering and camera sorters that augment human oversight. Manual machines linger in aging European fleets, yet account for less than one-third of the grape harvesting machinery market. Autonomous/Semi-Autonomous operations are projected to register the fastest CAGR of 13.2% during 2026-2031, driven by increasing adoption of sensor-integrated systems that reduce dependence on manual labor. In February 2024, trials at Duxton Vineyards in Australia demonstrated that autonomous tractors can efficiently transmit canopy data to harvester controls, guiding pickers along optimal paths. Meanwhile, regulatory frameworks are adapting to authorize driverless operations on geofenced private lands.

Despite the promise, transition costs pose a significant barrier to adoption. Autonomous systems come with a higher price tag than their assisted counterparts. Yet, California's overtime premiums render round-the-clock driverless operations financially appealing. In the European Union, stringent data privacy regulations mandate the use of secure cloud services. This has prompted Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to set up regional data centers. Furthermore, potential buyers are weighing liability insurance premiums as a crucial factor before finalizing their purchases.

Geography Analysis

In 2025, Europe commanded a dominant 37.1% share of the grape harvesting machinery market, bolstered by advanced mechanization in France, Italy, and Spain. The region benefited from robust funding of USD 1.12 billion (EUR 1.061 billion) from the Annual Common Agricultural Policy, underscoring its commitment to fleet renewal and precision agriculture in key wine-producing areas. Highlighting the impact of climate volatility, Germany's 2025 crop shortfall nudged its traditionally conservative vineyard estates towards embracing mechanized harvesting. In a bid to modernize, Italy earmarked USD 152 million (EUR 144.1 million) for vineyard restructuring in 2026, with a focus on harvester upgrades. The European market, dominated by established manufacturers, is witnessing a pronounced shift in demand towards lightweight, digitally advanced, and fuel-efficient harvesting units, particularly for premium vineyards and Alpine terrace cultivation.

Asia-Pacific is set to witness a robust 9.4% CAGR in the grapes harvesting machinery market between 2026 and 2031. In China, Ningxia estates are modernizing their operations to counteract a dip in national wine output, bolstered by regional subsidies that ease machinery costs. In Australia, wage pressures have driven machinery hire rates to nearly USD 345 per hour in 2025, spurring large vineyard estates to accelerate trials of autonomous harvesting. Meanwhile, in India, the Maharashtra government is expanding mechanization grants to include grape pickers, signaling growing acceptance of mechanization in emerging commercial vineyards.

North America is witnessing a surge in demand for high-capacity grape harvesting machinery, fueled by increasing vineyard consolidation in major wine-producing states. Notable acquisitions, such as The Wine Group's 2025 buyout of a sprawling 6,600-acre vineyard, are paving the way for efficient harvesting fleets that promise reduced labor reliance. Concurrently, manufacturers are bolstering regional supply chains and enhancing aftermarket services. A case in point is Oxbo's New York facility, which is amplifying parts accessibility and service responsiveness for the often-overlooked East Coast vineyards. In South America, both Chilean and Argentine wine producers are ramping up investments in mechanization. Their goal: to curtail production costs, ensure consistent harvests, and bolster their competitive edge in exports, especially in light of rising labor costs. Meanwhile, the Middle East and Africa, still in the nascent stages of adoption, are witnessing selective mechanization growth. Regions like South Africa's Westerreliance on labormore amidn Cape and Turkey's Thrace are seeing commercial vineyards invest in modern harvesting tools, aiming to boost operational efficiency and maintain export quality.

1. Pellenc S.A.S.
2. New Holland Agriculture - Braud (CNH Industrial N.V.)
3. Oxbo International Corporation (Ploeger Oxbo Group B.V.)
4. Gregoire S.A.S. (SDF S.p.A.)
5. ERO GmbH
6. Kubota Corporation
7. Yanmar Holdings Co., Ltd.
8. Alma S.R.L.
9. CRF Costruzioni S.R.L.
10. Blueline Manufacturing Company
11. American Grape Harvesters Inc.
12. Bobard S.A.S.
13. Nairn Harvesters Limited
14. Reese Group Ltd.
15. Weremczuk FMR Sp. z o.o.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Labor-shortage driven mechanization surge
  • 4.2.2 Vineyard consolidation among large wine producers
  • 4.2.3 Government mechanization subsidies and tax credits
  • 4.2.4 Precision-viticulture adoption requiring data-ready machinery
  • 4.2.5 Emerging rental and subscription ownership models
  • 4.2.6 Development of lightweight self-propelled micro-harvesters
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High upfront capital expenditure
  • 4.3.2 Operator-skill and maintenance complexity
  • 4.3.3 Quality concerns for premium hand-picked varietals
  • 4.3.4 Limited suitability on extreme-slope vineyards
• 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.5 Technological Outlook
• 4.6 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Harvester Type
  • 5.1.1 Self-Propelled Grape Harvesters
  • 5.1.2 Trailed / Towed Grape Harvesters
  • 5.1.3 Tractor-Mounted Grape Harvesters
• 5.2 By Mode of Operation
  • 5.2.1 Manual Steering & Operation
  • 5.2.2 Assisted / Precision-Guided Operation
  • 5.2.3 Autonomous / Semi-Autonomous Operation
• 5.3 By Power Source
  • 5.3.1 Diesel-Powered Harvesters
  • 5.3.2 Hybrid Harvesters
  • 5.3.3 Electric Harvesters
• 5.4 By Vineyard Size
  • 5.4.1 Small Vineyards (Below 50 Hectares)
  • 5.4.2 Medium Vineyards (51-200 Hectares)
  • 5.4.3 Large Vineyards (Above 200 Hectares)
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.1.4 Rest of North America
  • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 France
    • 5.5.3.2 Italy
    • 5.5.3.3 Spain
    • 5.5.3.4 Germany
    • 5.5.3.5 Russia
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Australia
    • 5.5.4.3 Japan
    • 5.5.4.4 India
    • 5.5.4.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.5 Middle East
    • 5.5.5.1 Turkey
    • 5.5.5.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of Middle East
  • 5.5.6 Africa
    • 5.5.6.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.6.2 Morocco
    • 5.5.6.3 Rest of Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (Includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as Available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for Key Companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Pellenc S.A.S.
  • 6.4.2 New Holland Agriculture - Braud (CNH Industrial N.V.)
  • 6.4.3 Oxbo International Corporation (Ploeger Oxbo Group B.V.)
  • 6.4.4 Gregoire S.A.S. (SDF S.p.A.)
  • 6.4.5 ERO GmbH
  • 6.4.6 Kubota Corporation
  • 6.4.7 Yanmar Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4.8 Alma S.R.L.
  • 6.4.9 CRF Costruzioni S.R.L.
  • 6.4.10 Blueline Manufacturing Company
  • 6.4.11 American Grape Harvesters Inc.
  • 6.4.12 Bobard S.A.S.
  • 6.4.13 Nairn Harvesters Limited
  • 6.4.14 Reese Group Ltd.
  • 6.4.15 Weremczuk FMR Sp. z o.o.

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook