치과 충전 재료 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the tooth filling materials market size is projected to expand from USD 2.45 billion in 2025 and USD 2.61 billion in 2026 to USD 3.55 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 6.35% between 2026 to 2031.

This report is Segmented by Material Type (Composite Resin, Silver Amalgam, Glass Ionomer, Gold Fillings, Ceramics, and Others), Filling Type (Direct Fillings, and Indirect Fillings), End User (Dental Clinics, Hospitals, and Dental Laboratories), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Tooth Filling Materials Market Trends and Insights

High Global Caries Burden Sustaining Restorative Demand

Untreated dental caries in permanent teeth remains the most prevalent health condition worldwide, with the WHO reporting nearly 3.7 billion people affected and 2.4 billion adults carrying untreated decay by age 70 based on Global Burden of Disease assessments. This persistent burden keeps baseline procedures steady even as preventive programs scale in high fluoridation regions and school-based initiatives expand. Urbanization and increased access to sugar-dense diets are increasing risk in emerging markets at the same time that insurance coverage and income growth enable more restorative care. Insurance gaps in large national schemes continue to delay treatment in underserved populations, which drives steady use of glass ionomer and direct composites once access improves. Evidence on older adults shows high rates of missing and decayed teeth in the United States, underscoring retreatment needs in seniors and medically complex patients who often face xerostomia, which compounds caries risk.

Rising Preference for Aesthetic, Tooth Colored Restorations

Consumer expectations and social media visibility are shaping demand for natural-looking anterior and posterior restorations that blend with surrounding dentition. Simplified shade composite systems and improved translucency control are reducing the trade-off between efficiency and esthetics in busy practices. For example, Ivoclar's universal composite system introduced in 2025 uses engineered translucency shift to support bulk placement while achieving dentin-like opacity after cure, which fits high-throughput clinical schedules. Universal adhesives with reliable bonding to enamel and dentin further streamline esthetic workflows and help clinicians maintain predictable results across variable clinical conditions. As practitioners gravitate toward systems that achieve shade coverage with fewer SKUs and shorter placement time, the tooth filling materials market continues to favor esthetic resin-based options in both general dentistry and cosmetic practices.

High Cost of Advanced Materials and Limited Reimbursement for Elective Restorations

Premium composites, bulk fill systems, and CAD/CAM milled blocks carry higher acquisition costs than basic alternatives, which can strain budgets in public clinics and among fee-for-service patients without robust insurance. Gaps in adult dental coverage in many geographies push price sensitivity, which drives clinicians to balance esthetics, speed, and unit cost when selecting restorative materials. Hospitals and community clinics must weigh capital purchases for digital workflows against the patient mix and reimbursement structures available in their states and regions. Policy changes that allow coverage where dental care is clinically linked to medical treatment can improve access, but these pathways remain narrow, and documentation requirements may add administrative burden. As a result, procurement committees often prioritize universal adhesives and simplified shade composites that standardize training and reduce wastage. However, broader adoption of advanced indirect materials can lag in cost-constrained settings, which moderates growth in the tooth-filling materials market.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Rapid Innovation in Composites, Glass Ionomers, and Universal Adhesives
2. Amalgam Phase Down/Ban Accelerating Shift to Mercury Free Materials
3. Safety/Regulatory Scrutiny of Monomers and MDR/FDA Compliance Burden

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Composite resin held the leading position in 2025 with 42.37% share as continuous gains in filler technology, polymerization chemistry, and shade simplification reinforced clinician preference for esthetic and efficient workflows. The segment continues to benefit from bulk fill composites that enable deeper cures and from universal adhesives that shorten bonding steps across a wide set of indications. Solventum's composite families feature stress-relieving monomer systems and single-step placement up to 4.5 mm, which helps clinics manage throughput without compromising wear performance in posterior restorations. Ivoclar's 2025 universal composite system uses a designed translucency transition during cure to improve blending and depth of cure, paired with high-output light activation to accelerate placement in bulk. These designs fit general practice needs for predictable shade matching with fewer SKUs, while also supporting Class I and Class II applications in busy appointment schedules. The tooth filling materials market sees higher adoption of simplified shade systems in DSOs and group practices that standardize inventory and training.

Glass ionomer cements are broadening their role as studies show significant improvements in compressive strength and fluoride release when nanoparticle and bioactive additives are used. One peer-reviewed study reported compressive strength that met and exceeded ISO thresholds for posterior use with ionogel and titanium hydroxide additives. At the same time, another showed nanosilver-doped bioactive glass ionomer with higher cumulative fluoride release than conventional formulations. These features make glass ionomers attractive in older adults and high caries risk patients who benefit from chemical adhesion and fluoride recharge. In premium indirect care, lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramics support inlays and onlays that can be fabricated chairside, although capital costs limit adoption in lower volume clinics. Silver amalgam shows a temporary lift in certain markets due to transition planning and inventory behavior, but regulatory timelines point to a secular shift to mercury-free options through 2031.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Material Type
  • Composite Resin
  • Silver Amalgam
  • Glass Ionomer
  • Gold Fillings
  • Ceramics
  • Others
• By Filling Type
  • Direct Fillings
  • Indirect Fillings
• By End User
  • Dental Clinics
  • Hospitals
  • Dental Laboratories
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • GCC
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East and Africa
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America

Geography Analysis

North America held 39.41% of the tooth filling materials market share in 2025, as high per capita dental spending, private insurance, and early adoption of premium composites and scanners sustained demand. The region continues shifting to mercury-free materials, with the Indian Health Service moving to end amalgam use by 2027 in federal and tribal care, which guides procurement and training toward composites and glass ionomers. DSOs drive standard formularies and bulk buying, which support simplified shade composites and universal adhesives. Digitally enabled practices connect scanners to cloud platforms to coordinate with labs, while fee-for-service and rural sites maintain a direct composite focus where capital budgets are limited.

Europe is defined by regulatory momentum that removed amalgam from routine care by 2025, which accelerates a transition to composites and glass ionomers across public and private systems. Adoption of universal adhesives and simplified shade composites is strong in Western Europe, where clinics favor predictable esthetics and reduced procedure time. Implementation of device documentation and post-market follow-up requirements continues to shape supplier participation, with professional organizations engaging regulators on proportionate expectations for dental labs and custom-made devices. The region also uses chairside milling and CAD/CAM workflows in metropolitan areas, though smaller clinics may pursue labs for pressed or milled ceramics depending on case complexity.

Asia-Pacific leads future expansion with a projected 12.84% CAGR as middle-class growth, urban insurance pilots, and clinical infrastructure investments lift restorative volumes. Regional enforcement aligned to the Minamata Convention reinforces a shift to mercury-free materials, which benefits suppliers with broad composite and adhesive portfolios. Japan, Australia, and South Korea maintain advanced adoption of digital workflows in larger practices. At the same time, public health programs across parts of Southeast Asia apply atraumatic restorative techniques with glass ionomers in community settings. Studies on printed resin blocks and lithium disilicate support confidence in indirect overlays where scanner penetration is rising, although capital costs continue to modulate adoption by market tier.

1. BISCO, Inc.
2. Coltene Holding
3. DenMat Holdings, LLC
4. Dentsply Sirona
5. DMG Chemisch-Pharmazeutische Fabrik
6. DMP Dental Industry S.A.
7. Envista Holdings Corporation (Kerr Dental)
8. FGM Dental Group
9. GC Corporation
10. Ivoclar Vivadent
11. Kulzer
12. Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.
13. Prime Dental Products Pvt. Ltd.
14. SDI
15. Shofu Inc.
16. Solventum
17. Tokuyama Dental
18. Ultradent Products
19. VITA Zahnfabrik
20. VOCO

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 High Global Caries Burden Sustaining Restorative Demand
  • 4.2.2 Rising Preference for Aesthetic, Tooth-Colored Restorations
  • 4.2.3 Aging Population and Greater Oral-Health Awareness Increasing Procedure Volumes
  • 4.2.4 Rapid Innovation in Composites, Glass Ionomers, And Universal Adhesives
  • 4.2.5 Amalgam Phase-Down/Ban Accelerating Shift to Mercury-Free Materials
  • 4.2.6 Digitization Expanding Indirect Inlays/Onlays and Resin/Ceramic Blocks
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High Cost of Advanced Materials and Limited Reimbursement for Elective Restorations
  • 4.3.2 Safety/Regulatory Scrutiny of Monomers and MDR/FDA Compliance Burden
  • 4.3.3 Polymerization Shrinkage and Technique Sensitivity Driving Secondary Caries/Retreatments
  • 4.3.4 Time and Skill Intensity for Multi-Layer Esthetic Composites in Public/DSO Settings
• 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porters Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

• 5.1 By Material Type
  • 5.1.1 Composite Resin
  • 5.1.2 Silver Amalgam
  • 5.1.3 Glass Ionomer
  • 5.1.4 Gold Fillings
  • 5.1.5 Ceramics
  • 5.1.6 Others
• 5.2 By Filling Type
  • 5.2.1 Direct Fillings
  • 5.2.2 Indirect Fillings
• 5.3 By End User
  • 5.3.1 Dental Clinics
  • 5.3.2 Hospitals
  • 5.3.3 Dental Laboratories
• 5.4 By Geography
  • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.4.2 Europe
    • 5.4.2.1 Germany
    • 5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.2.3 France
    • 5.4.2.4 Italy
    • 5.4.2.5 Spain
    • 5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.3.1 China
    • 5.4.3.2 India
    • 5.4.3.3 Japan
    • 5.4.3.4 Australia
    • 5.4.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.4.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.4.1 GCC
    • 5.4.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
  • 5.4.5 South America
    • 5.4.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of South America

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Market Share Analysis
• 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.3.1 BISCO, Inc.
  • 6.3.2 Coltene Holding AG
  • 6.3.3 DenMat Holdings, LLC
  • 6.3.4 Dentsply Sirona Inc.
  • 6.3.5 DMG Chemisch-Pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH
  • 6.3.6 DMP Dental Industry S.A.
  • 6.3.7 Envista Holdings Corporation (Kerr Dental)
  • 6.3.8 FGM Dental Group
  • 6.3.9 GC Corporation
  • 6.3.10 Ivoclar Vivadent AG
  • 6.3.11 Kulzer GmbH
  • 6.3.12 Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.
  • 6.3.13 Prime Dental Products Pvt. Ltd.
  • 6.3.14 SDI Limited
  • 6.3.15 Shofu Inc.
  • 6.3.16 Solventum
  • 6.3.17 Tokuyama Dental Corporation
  • 6.3.18 Ultradent Products Inc.
  • 6.3.19 VITA Zahnfabrik
  • 6.3.20 VOCO GmbH

7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment