탄소 내재화 IT 자산 수명주기 소프트웨어 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market size was valued at USD 0.65 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 2.33 billion by 2031, expanding at a CAGR of 24.15% during 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Component (Software, and Services), Deployment Mode (Cloud-Based, and On-Premises), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium Enterprises), Application (Embodied Carbon Accounting, and More), End User (IT and Telecom, BFSI, Industrial Manufacturing, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Embodied Carbon IT Asset Lifecycle Software Market Trends and Insights

Stringent Scope 3 and IT Sustainability Disclosure Requirements Drive Platform Demand

Regulatory pressure is pushing carbon data for IT hardware into formal reporting cycles. ESRS E1 places purchased goods and services inside a structured climate disclosure framework, which means device-related emissions can no longer be handled as a side estimate inside broad sustainability summaries. Germany's CSRD implementation process also reinforced the need for large enterprises to prepare for reporting tied to fiscal year 2025, which moved compliance work into active budget and systems planning. This change matters because the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market is being pulled by audit expectations rather than by branding goals alone. Software that connects procurement records, asset data, and emissions logic is becoming easier to justify when disclosure reviews involve finance, sustainability, and internal controls teams simultaneously. The same compliance pressure also extends to supplier networks, meaning reporting entities often need stronger upstream data collection even when their direct hardware purchasing patterns have not changed.

Rising Demand for Audit-Ready Embodied Carbon Data in IT Procurement Deepens Data Provenance Needs

Procurement teams are under growing pressure to use product-level carbon data instead of broad proxy values when they assess IT purchases. Lenovo's 2025 rollout of configuration-level product carbon footprints for ThinkPad, built with Makersite, showed that OEM transparency is becoming a practical differentiator in enterprise buying conversations. That shift matters because buyers do not just need a number; they need one that can be traced back to a specific product setup and understood across suppliers. As a result, the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market is moving away from simple reporting dashboards and toward platforms that can ingest, normalize, and compare primary data from several OEM sources. This also increases the value of software that can maintain consistent records across purchasing cycles, device refreshes, and disclosure periods. Vendors that can handle supplier data variation without breaking reporting quality are likely to gain more enterprise attention.

Fragmented Embodied Carbon Factors Across OEMs And Device Classes Limit Data Fidelity

Data quality remains uneven because product carbon information is still not published with the same depth across all hardware makers and device categories. Lenovo's configuration-level footprint work is one example of stronger transparency, but that level of detail is not yet standard across the full supply base. Ecoinvent offers one of the largest lifecycle inventory bases available, yet no dataset library fully covers every new and specialized hardware profile entering enterprise fleets. This means many platforms still need to blend supplier-specific values with modeled assumptions and secondary factors. That can weaken consistency when enterprises compare fleets across brands, form factors, and refresh cycles. The embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market still has strong demand, but uneven upstream data remains a real brake on confidence and implementation speed.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Expansion of Circular IT Practices, Reuse, and Lifecycle Extension Programs Extends Software's Role
2. Convergence of IT Asset Management, ESG Reporting, and FinOps Workflows Creates A Broader Buying Center
3. Integration Complexity Across ITAM, ERP, ESG, and Procurement Systems Raises Deployment Friction

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Software held 69.74% of the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market in 2025, establishing it as the core delivery layer across the category. That position reflects how most buyers start by needing to collect device information, apply emissions logic, and produce consistent outputs within a single configurable system. The first enterprise question is usually about data capture and reporting repeatability, which naturally favors software before services spending expands. The embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market also remains software-led, as automation reduces manual carbon accounting work that many internal teams cannot sustain across multiple reporting periods. Established lifecycle and carbon platforms entered this space with proven data structures, while newer vendors focused on making those processes faster and easier to scale.

This lead does not imply that services are secondary in importance, as services are projected to expand at a 24.65% CAGR through 2031. Many buyers still need help with data preparation, methodology choices, system mapping, and the handoff between sustainability teams and IT operations. Service demand rises further when organizations want a faster route to usable outputs but do not yet have enough internal LCA or carbon accounting capacity. Sphera's managed LCA content offering, supported by more than 20,000 datasets annually updated and third-party verified, demonstrates why content and implementation support are often sold together in complex deployments. Over time, the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software industry is likely to remain anchored by software revenue, while services capture more value in integration, quality control, and ongoing model governance.

Cloud deployment accounted for 66.12% of the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market in 2025, giving it a clear lead among delivery models. The preference is practical because cloud delivery supports faster onboarding, easier updates, and less infrastructure burden for sustainability teams that usually do not manage large internal software environments. It also works well for platforms that need frequent data refreshes from factor libraries, supplier records, and enterprise systems. Access to regularly updated lifecycle inventory content matters here, and broad databases such as ecoinvent reinforce the value of centrally managed updates rather than isolated local copies. The embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market still leans toward cloud because buyers want speed, flexibility, and simpler maintenance during early rollout phases.

Hybrid deployment is projected to grow at a 25.02% CAGR through 2031, which makes it the fastest-growing mode. This pattern reflects the needs of regulated organizations that want cloud-based modeling power but still prefer tighter control over telemetry, inventory detail, or internal records. Hybrid setups also appeal to enterprises that already run established governance systems on-site and do not want to move all connected data into a shared environment at once. ISO/IEC TS 19770-13:2026 supports this direction by encouraging the structured incorporation of sustainability information into existing ITAM systems rather than a one-size-fits-all architecture. On-premises deployment remains relevant in organizations with longer software replacement cycles, but the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market is clearly shifting toward models that combine cloud flexibility with stronger control over sensitive data.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Component
  • Software
  • Services
• By Deployment Mode
  • Cloud-Based
  • On-Premises
• By Enterprise Size
  • Large Enterprises
  • Small and Medium Enterprises
• By Application
  • Embodied Carbon Accounting
  • IT Asset Lifecycle Optimization
  • Circularity and Reuse Planning
  • Compliance and Reporting
• By End User
  • IT and Telecom
  • BFSI
  • Industrial Manufacturing
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Oil and Gas
  • Retail and E-Commerce
  • Construction and Infrastructure
  • Government and Public Sector
  • Other End Users
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Turkey
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Europe held 34.56% of the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market share in 2025, maintaining its leading position. Germany, the United Kingdom, and France remain the main demand centers because they combine large enterprise bases with stronger reporting expectations and more mature sustainability processes. Germany is especially important because CSRD implementation planning and corporate preparation have accelerated the need for structured reporting workflows for purchased goods and services. BITKOM's 2025 guidance also reflects the degree to which technology and software organizations in the region are already linking resource efficiency with procurement and lifecycle planning.

Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at a 25.45% CAGR through 2031, which makes it the fastest-growing region in the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market. The region is entering a stronger adoption phase as disclosure practices expand across major economies and enterprise buyers demand better data from regional hardware suppliers. Japan, Australia, India, Singapore, China, and South Korea all contribute to this trend, as reporting activities and climate-related governance are becoming more formal across listed companies and large enterprises. Another factor is the region's weight in hardware manufacturing, which means supplier-side and buyer-side pressures often rise at the same time. This creates demand not only from reporting entities, but also from OEMs and component suppliers that need cleaner product carbon data to support global customer relationships.

North America held the second-largest regional share in the embodied carbon IT asset lifecycle software market in 2025. The United States remains central because it houses several well-funded vendors and a large base of enterprises that already run structured sustainability programs. Demand in this region is moving upstream from disclosure output into procurement-stage scoring, supplier data requests, and hardware refresh decisions. South America remains earlier in adoption, while the Middle East and Africa show a split pattern with stronger activity in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa than in the rest of the region.

1. One Click LCA Ltd
2. PRe Sustainability B.V.
3. Sphera Solutions, Inc.
4. GreenDelta GmbH
5. iPoint-systems GmbH
6. Makersite GmbH
7. Ecochain Technologies B.V.
8. Plan A Technologies GmbH
9. Greenly SAS
10. Normative AB
11. Persefoni AI, Inc.
12. Watershed Technology, Inc.
13. Sweep SAS
14. Dcycle, S.L.
15. Sinai Technologies, Inc.
16. Emitwise Limited
17. Measurabl, Inc.
18. Deepki SAS
19. OpenLCA GmbH
20. FigBytes Inc.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Stringent Scope 3 and IT Sustainability Disclosure Requirements
  • 4.2.2 Rising Demand for Audit-Ready Embodied Carbon Data in IT Procurement
  • 4.2.3 Expansion of Circular IT Practices, Reuse, and Lifecycle Extension Programs
  • 4.2.4 Convergence of IT Asset Management, ESG Reporting, and FinOps Workflows
  • 4.2.5 Wider Availability of Device-Level LCA Data Through APIs and Databases
  • 4.2.6 Growing Enterprise Focus on Product-Level Carbon Hotspots Across IT Fleets
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Fragmented Embodied Carbon Factors Across OEMs and Device Classes
  • 4.3.2 Integration Complexity Across ITAM, ERP, ESG, and Procurement Systems
  • 4.3.3 Security, Privacy, and Data Governance Concerns Around Asset Telemetry
  • 4.3.4 Limited Standardization of IT Asset Carbon Accounting Methodologies
• 4.4 Industry Value-Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Component
  • 5.1.1 Software
  • 5.1.2 Services
• 5.2 By Deployment Mode
  • 5.2.1 Cloud-Based
  • 5.2.2 On-Premises
• 5.3 By Enterprise Size
  • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
  • 5.3.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
• 5.4 By Application
  • 5.4.1 Embodied Carbon Accounting
  • 5.4.2 IT Asset Lifecycle Optimization
  • 5.4.3 Circularity and Reuse Planning
  • 5.4.4 Compliance and Reporting
• 5.5 By End User
  • 5.5.1 IT and Telecom
  • 5.5.2 BFSI
  • 5.5.3 Industrial Manufacturing
  • 5.5.4 Energy and Utilities
  • 5.5.5 Oil and Gas
  • 5.5.6 Retail and E-Commerce
  • 5.5.7 Construction and Infrastructure
  • 5.5.8 Government and Public Sector
  • 5.5.9 Other End Users
• 5.6 By Geography
  • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.6.2 South America
    • 5.6.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.6.3 Europe
    • 5.6.3.1 Germany
    • 5.6.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.3.3 France
    • 5.6.3.4 Italy
    • 5.6.3.5 Spain
    • 5.6.3.6 Russia
    • 5.6.3.7 Rest of Europe
  • 5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4.1 China
    • 5.6.4.2 India
    • 5.6.4.3 Japan
    • 5.6.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.6.4.5 Australia
    • 5.6.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.6.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.6.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.6.5.1.3 Turkey
      • 5.6.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.6.5.2 Africa
      • 5.6.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.6.5.2.2 Egypt
      • 5.6.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 One Click LCA Ltd
  • 6.4.2 PRe Sustainability B.V.
  • 6.4.3 Sphera Solutions, Inc.
  • 6.4.4 GreenDelta GmbH
  • 6.4.5 iPoint-systems GmbH
  • 6.4.6 Makersite GmbH
  • 6.4.7 Ecochain Technologies B.V.
  • 6.4.8 Plan A Technologies GmbH
  • 6.4.9 Greenly SAS
  • 6.4.10 Normative AB
  • 6.4.11 Persefoni AI, Inc.
  • 6.4.12 Watershed Technology, Inc.
  • 6.4.13 Sweep SAS
  • 6.4.14 Dcycle, S.L.
  • 6.4.15 Sinai Technologies, Inc.
  • 6.4.16 Emitwise Limited
  • 6.4.17 Measurabl, Inc.
  • 6.4.18 Deepki SAS
  • 6.4.19 OpenLCA GmbH
  • 6.4.20 FigBytes Inc.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment